Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Example of An Experiment (Self)
Example of An Experiment (Self)
Transgender Paranoia
---------
Transgender Paranoia
experience in the workplace and paranoia is present (Thoroughgood et al. 2017), however
there is little evidence showcasing a direct causation to paranoid ideation in the transgender
population. This present research aims to either prove or disprove if there is a correlation
between age and paranoid ideation in transgender individuals, aiming to answer the research
H0: There will be no correlation between age and paranoid ideation in transgender
participants
Method
Research Design
This research will be carried out as a within subject design, across ten years to
examine the presence of paranoid cognition throughout the life span. This will include
dependent variable, with age being an independent variable and a control of the gender
repeated following ten years. The results will be collated and analysed using statistical
3
individuals over time. The method used will remain the same on both instances of research to
measure the correlation between age and paranoid ideation. Thus, the aim is to determine if
the experiences within adulthood, namely the workplace, is a potential cause to transgender
paranoia.
Participants
Participants will consist of individuals aged 15-19 and speak English. Recruitment
will include a transgender males, females and non-binary participants based on the critera that
their assigned gender at birth does not align with their gender identity (Thouroughgood et al.
2017). Additionally, participants who are GC will be recruited as a control, with an even split
between GC and non-GC participants, aiming for approximately 60 participants in total. Due
Materials
measure the extent of paranoia in individuals. This includes eighteen statements such as, “I
need to be on my guard against others.”, that is measured on a six-point Likert scale, with
higher scores indicating a higher presence of paranoia. This tool holds a Cronbach coefficient
of .87, proving it to be a justifiable measure for research. A copy of these questions will be
The participants will be recruited from online queer support forums (with permission),
through creating a post outlining the research. Then, once contacted, they will complete a
screening to test eligibility. Following this, the participants will complete Freeman et al’s
2005 questionnaire, taking approximately an hour, which they will be paid according to their
4
hourly wage. This will be completed again following the ten-year gap, using the same
participants and method. Data will then be collated and analysed using relevant statistical
methods.
Confidentiality
The National Statement on Ethical Conduct (TNSEC) (National Health and Medical
Research Council, 2018) refers to privacy concerning multiple ethical areas for research. Due
to the increased risk of discrimination and harm that transgender individuals endure
(Lombardi et al. 2002), it is essential that all data remains anonymous. The only factors
known will be the participants gender and their assigned sex at birth. Prior to disposal, data
will be kept in a locked file on the researcher’s personal computer, the participants will be
made aware that data will be kept for a prolonged period due to the nature of the research.
The data will be disposed following the minimum period for data retention of 5 years after
publication.
Consent
During this research, voluntary consent is essential. The participants will be informed
via a consent form of the ‘purpose, methods, demands, risk, and potential benefits’ (National
Health and Medical Research Council, 2018, p.16) as well as the retention and disposal of
data. Additionally, consent can be retracted throughout research at any time, resulting in the
participant being withdrawn and data being disposed. Participants will be reimbursed based
Risk can be described using the potential of harm as well as its severity, which the
participants must be aware of to obtain consent (Hendriks et al. 2019). This research regards
vulnerable subject. To manage this risk, participants will be well informed of their
5
requirements, as well as a suitable helpline will be made available for all participants if any
harm were to occur. This research would benefit a minority group; however, the benefits
must outweigh the risks for research to be conducted, which the research proposal would
commencement.
To ensure that indigenous cultural knowledge and values are upheld, research will
ensure that both Indigenous Peoples and the HREC are included in all decision-making
processes. Additionally, the contribution of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants
guidelines (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2018) refer to ‘free, prior and
informed’ consent (P.15). Thus, an interpreter may be required for all areas of consent are to
towards transgender individuals, the analysis and dispersion of data will need to be
negotiated, and privacy is a main concern to retain cultural relationships and ensure
Indigenous rights are being met. All researchers must have experience in Indigenous
This research requires young participants who are not of age to consent in research.
understood by all parties, as well as consent must not be coerced by legal guardians (National
Health and Medical Research Council, 2018). Some participants will most likely be of a
mature age to understand information regarding research according to the TNSEC, however,
they may lack maturity to consent. Consent can be agreed between the young person and a
legal guardian using all information of the research process. Throughout this, the TNSEC
6
requires researchers must make a judgement on the young person’s capacity to consent
without coercion, as well as include a legal guardian or a review body to aid in this decision.
Consent may be decided by the legal guardian when the young person is unaware of the
benefits of research. In this case, the researcher may proceed, remaining attentive to the child
responding to the process, whilst ensuring their justice when consent is not formally given.
References
Carvalho, C. B., Sousa, M., Motta, C. D., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Caldeira, S. N., Peixoto, E. B.,
Cabra, J., Fenigstein, A. (2017). Paranoia in the general population: A revised version
of the general paranoia scale for adults. Clinical Psychologist, 21, 125-134.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12065
Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Bebbington, P. E., Smith, B., Rollinson, R., Fowler, D., Kuipers,
E., Ray, K., Dunn, G. (2005), Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.186.5.427.
Hendriks, S., Grady, C., Ramos, K. M., Chiong, W., Fins. J. J., Ford, P., Goering, S., Greely,
H.T., Hutchison, K., Kelly, M. L., Kim, S. Y. H., Klein, E., Lisanby, S. H., Mayberg,
H., Maslen, H., Miller, F. G., Rommelfanger, K., Sheth, S. A., Wexler, A. (2019).
doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523
Lombardi, E. L., Wilchins, R. A., Priesing, D., Malouf, D. (2002). Gender violence:
National Health and Medical Research Council. Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2018). National statement on ethical
Throroughgood, C. N., Sawyer, K. B., Webster, J. R. (2017). What lies beneath: How
of discrimination at work and their job attitudes and wellbeing. Journal of Vocational