Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Detergen Bleach Sodium Hyphochlorite
Detergen Bleach Sodium Hyphochlorite
T
Bernard P. Bubnis, Ching Kuo,
Robert S. Cushing,
and Richard H. Sakaji
OCl – chemistry
Commercially produced OCl– typ-
ically contains between 0.001 and 0.1
M hydroxide ion (OH–). Thus, the liq-
uid bleach typically has a pH between
11 an d 13. In basic solu tion , OCl–
liqu id bleach , an d fin ish ed water sam ples from m ore decomposition to form ClO3– has been shown to be a sec-
th an 100 u tilities applyin g liqu id bleach for ch lori- ond-order process3 with the following stoichiometry:
nation clearly indicate that ClO3 – is entering the pub-
lic water su pply at levels equ al to or greater th an at 3OCl– → ClO 3 – + 2Cl– (1)
system s applyin g ch lorin e dioxide.3
There are three possible sources of ClO3 – in drink- Th e decom position of OCl– in volves ch lorite ion
in g water wh en liqu id bleach is u sed as th e ch lorin - (ClO 2 –) as an in term ediate in th e followin g gen er-
atin g agen t. On e sou rce is from th e raw water itself. ally accepted m ech an ism :3,4
Data from field surveys indicate that approximately 20
percent of responding utilities had ClO3 – of unknown OCl– + OCl– → ClO 2 – + Cl– (2)
origin at con cen tration s >10 µ g/ L in th e raw water.
A secon d poten tial sou rce of ClO 3 – is th e decom -
position of residu al h ypoch lorou s acid (HOCl) du rin g OCl– + ClO 2 – → ClO 3 – + Cl– (3)
th e disin fection process. It h as been clearly sh own ,
h owever, th at in th e dark, decom position of HOCl Th e reaction of ClO 2 – to form ClO 3 – is th e faster step,
at th e m g/ L level between pH 5 an d pH 8 is relatively m ean in g th at th e rate-lim itin g step is described in Eq
slow.2 On th e oth er h an d, in th e presen ce of UV ligh t 2—th e produ ction of ClO2 –. Th e ClO2 – con cen tration
(su n ligh t), HOCl decom poses with a ph otolysis h alf- in liqu id bleach is at least 200 tim es lower th an th e
life 5 of 12 m in at pH 8 an d in creases as th e ratio of OCl– con cen tration . Th u s, after application of th e
OCl– to HOCl in creases. Ph otocatalyzed decom posi- bleach for disin fection , a dose of 1 m g/ L FAC w ill
tion can be avoided by operatin g at low pH or by con tain <0.005 m g/ L ClO 2 –.
sh ieldin g from su n ligh t. Given th ese facts, th e for- Th e form ation of oxygen from decom posin g OCl–
m ation of m easu rable ClO 3 – attribu table to HOCl is a very slow side reaction in solu tion s of pu re OCl–
decom position u n der drin kin g water con dition s an d an d is con sidered to be on ly a m in or decom position
in th e absen ce of su n ligh t is u n likely. path way (<10 percen t) 3 :
Th e th ird possible sou rce of ClO 3 – is th e decom -
position of OCl– in liqu id bleach or Ca(OCl) 2 du rin g OCl– + OCl– → O 2 + 2Cl– (4)
Concentration—mol/L
represen tation h as n o ch em ical im plication , is n ot
totally predictive, an d m ay n ot be applicable in situ - 1.5
ation s in wh ich th e con dition s differ from th ose u sed
to develop th e em pirical regression . Application of
an em pirical m odel lackin g ch em ical detail m ay be 1.0
risky, because the assumptions of the model itself can
lead to con fu sion abou t th e adverse effects on an d
im plication s to th e ch em ical process. Th e degree of 0.5
error and uncertainty associated with empirical mod-
elin g is h igh , an d th e possibility of in correct extrap-
0.0
olation s can lead to poor tim e-depen den t prediction s
0 25 50 75 100
th at h ave th e poten tial to be catastroph ic if or wh en
Time—days
th e m odel fails.
Specific ch em ical equ ation s th at in corporate tem -
peratu re an d ion ic stren gth were u sed in develop-
m en t of th e Gordon –Adam bleach decom position
model. The kinetic information was used to formulate percen t. Table 1 sh ows th e kin d of in form ation gen -
fu n dam en tal ch em ical an d th erm odyn am ic equ a- erated by th e program ; th e prin tou t in clu des in pu t
tion s describin g th e bleach decom position in th e pH bleach in form ation , predicted bleach decom position ,
11–14 range. The model is based on a complete chem- ClO3– formation, oxygen formation, the residual ClO3–
ical reaction set, experim en tal reaction rates, an d a concentration in the distribution system, and the like-
detailed rate law th at takes in to accou n t th e reaction lih ood of th e predicted distribu tion con cen tration
stoich iom etry.3 exceedin g th e u ser-defin ed m axim u m con tam in an t
level goal.
Gordon–Adam bleach decomposition model The computer program was developed to be used
Th e Gordon –Adam com pu ter-based m odel w as with a spreadsheet program.* In practice, a user will
d e ve lo p e d to p r e d ict ClO 3 – fo r m a tio n a n d OCl – proceed through a series of program prompts that are
decom position in stored liqu id bleach . Th e ch em ical automatically displayed on the viewing monitor. No
model has been incorporated into a computer program programming or advanced computer skills are required.
th at requ ires a u tility to in pu t on ly th e bleach an d If an entered value is outside the acceptable range for
ClO 3 – con cen tration s (preferably recen tly m easu red a particular parameter (e.g., the pH must be between
valu es) alon g with th e storage tem peratu res an d pH. 11 and 14), the program will inform the user that a
If available, addition al in pu t factors (su ch as Cl–) can problem exists and will require a new input value.
be en tered by th e u ser or, if u n available, will be esti- Verif icat ion of half -lif e predict ions. Table 2
m ated by th e program . sh ow s experim en tal an d m odel prediction s for th e
Th e bleach decom position m odel h elps u tilities h alf-lives of variou s con cen tration s of th ree bleach
using liquid bleach answer some important questions: types (con tin u ou s process, batch process, an d labo-
• How lon g does th e stored bleach m ain tain its ratory-produ ced). Th e differen ces betw een th e ex-
stren gth ? perim en tal an d predicted h alf-lives average less th an
• How rapidly will ClO 3 – bu ild u p? 7 percen t.
• Will oxygen form ation be a problem ? Figure 1 illustrates FAC decomposition at 25 o C for
• Wh at is th e projected m axim u m tim e to store bleach man u factu red by th e con tin u ou s-bleach proc-
th e bleach before u se? ess. Th e valu es of experim en tal data poin ts (m arked
• Wh at are th e econ om ies of scale in pu rch asin g as squ ares an d trian gles) fall on th e predicted OCl–
versu s storin g liqu id bleach ? decom position an d ClO 3 – form ation cu rves.
• Wh at sh ou ld be th e m in im u m ClO 3 – con cen - Predictions under conditions of temperature
tration in th e desired produ ct? variation. Tables 3 an d 4 sh ow m easu red an d pre-
Field data in dicate th at th e program can be u sed
to predict bleach con cen tration to better th an ±10 *Lotu s 1–2–3
–
u id bleach solu tion .
Figu re 3 sh ow s th at th e m odel overestim ates 8
th e ClO 3 – con cen tration in a secon d liqu id bleach 6
storage tan k by approxim ately 13 percen t. Non eth e-
4
less, th e agreem en t between th e predicted an d m ea-
su red ClO 3 – con cen tration s in th e storage tan k is 2
im proved, i.e., th e data sh ow less scatter alon g th e 0
regression lin e. Th is im provem en t cou ld be du e in 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
part to im proved an alysis of th e h igh ly con cen - –
Predicted CIO3 —mg/L ✕ 1,000
trated liqu id bleach , in clu din g dilu tion s an d tem - The solid line is the regression line of the measured
peratu re con trol. data points.
In gen eral, th e data sh ow th at in th e field, dif-
feren ces betw een predicted an d m easu red ClO 3 –
con cen tration s w ere greater. Th e in crease in th e
differen ces betw een th e predicted an d m easu red
FIG U R E 3 Regression of predicted and measured
valu es is believed to be th e resu lt of u n certain ties
ClO3 – concentrations in storage tank 2
du rin g dilu tion of th e con cen trated bleach . Th is is over a 30-day period
n ot su rprisin g, becau se th e laboratory develop-
m en t of th e m odel w as perform ed u n der tigh tly Perfect correlation (m = 1) Measured CIO3
–
con trolled con dition s, w h ereas in th e field proce- Calculated regression (m = 1.13)
20
du res su ch as dilu tin g stock solu tion s u sin g an
exterior sigh t glass provided on ly rou gh estim ates 18
Measured CIO3 —mg/L ✕ 1,000
( ± 1 0 –2 5 p e r ce n t ) . Co n sid e r in g t h e n u m e r o u s 16
poten tial sou rces of error, th e field data in dicate
14
th at th e m odel can be u sed to predict ClO 3 – con -
cen tration s in stored liqu id bleach at a level th at is 12
acceptable to u tilities operatin g u n der fu ll-scale 10
–
con dition s.
The predicted model and operational observations 8
0 320
1 330 323 2 .1 340 333 2 .1 Ca(OCl) 2 → 2 CaCl2 + O 2 (7)
3 340 327 3 .8 400 360 1 0 .0
7 370§ 336 9 .2 420 411 2 .1
9 340 341 0 .3 430 437 1 .6 At room tem peratu re for
14 350 352 0 .6 510 500 2 .0 so lid Ca ( OCl) 2 , t h e ClO 3 –
21 380 367 3 .4 590 587 0 .5
29 380 385 1 .3 660 683 3 .5
path w ay is proposed to ac-
35 380 398 4 .7 710 754 6 .2 cou n t for rou gh ly 70 percen t
42 380 414 8 .9 780 835 7 .1 decom position , w h ereas O 2
49 390 429 1 0 .0 890 913 2 .6
56 400 444 1 1 .0 940 990 5 .3 accou n ts for approxim ately
65 420 464 1 0 .5 980 1 ,0 8 7 1 0 .9 30 percent. Experience shows
77 510 490 3 .9 1 ,1 7 0 1 ,2 1 1 3 .5
th at at th e tim e of m an u fac-
* Parame te rs us e d inc lude 2 pe rc e nt FAC, pH = 1 1 .8 9 , Cl– = 0 .2 8 6 M. ture, typically the weight per-
† Me an = 5 .4 cen t Ca(ClO 3 ) 2 is 1.4 percen t
‡ Me an = 4 .4
– o
§ Statis tic ally, it appe ars that the me as ure d ClO3 c o nc e ntratio n fo r day 7 at 2 5 C is to o high.
a n d t h e w e igh t p e r ce n t
Re mo val o f this data po int re duc e s the ave rage pe rc e nt diffe re nc e to 5 .0 . Ca(OCl) 2 ) is between 70 an d
75 percen t. Th u s, w h en on e
m o le o f Ca ( O Cl) 2 d e co m -
p o se s, 0 .2 3 –0 .2 5 m o le s o f
Ca(ClO 3 ) 2 w ill form . In th e
TAB LE 6 Measured and predicted Ca(ClO3 ) 2 concentrations* as a function absence of more detailed data
of holding time for solid Ca(OCl) 2 to th e con trary, th e w eigh t
p e r ce n t Ca ( ClO 3 ) 2 ca n b e
Measured Predicted
Time Ca(OCl) 2 Ca(ClO2 ) 2 Ca(ClO3 ) 2 Mass [Ca(ClO3 ) 2 ] t mg/ L ClO3 –/
e st im a t e d u sin g a cu r r e n t
days mol/ 100 g mol/ 100 g mol/ 100 g Balance mol/ 100 g mg/ L FAC titration of w eigh t percen t
Ca(OCl) 2 ).
0 0 .4 9 3 0 .0 0 0 0 7 0 .0 0 6 5 0 .5 1 3 0 .0 2
9 0 .4 9 1 0 .0 0 0 0 7 0 .0 0 6 6 0 .5 1 1 0 .0 0 7 0 0 .0 2 If [Ca(ClO 3 ) 2 ] 0 is taken as
18 0 .4 9 0 0 .0 0 0 1 0 .0 0 6 5 0 .5 1 0 0 .0 0 7 2 0 .0 2 th e in itial assay of calciu m
32 0 .4 8 0 0 .0 0 0 2 0 .0 0 6 7 0 .5 0 1 0 .0 0 9 5 0 .0 2
46 0 .4 9 1 0 .0 0 0 5 0 .0 0 7 3 0 .5 1 4 0 .0 0 7 0 0 .0 2
ch lorate ( t = 0; e.g., date of
74 0 .4 8 2 0 .0 0 0 3 0 .0 0 7 1 0 .5 0 4 0 .0 0 9 0 0 .0 2 m an u factu re or as m easu red
116 0 .4 7 6 0 .0 0 0 4 0 .0 0 6 1 0 .4 9 5 0 .0 1 0 4 0 .0 2 on th e day of receipt) an d
* Co nc e ntratio n units are in mo le s o f e ac h s pe c ie s pe r 1 0 0 grams o f s ample .
[Ca(OCl) 2 ] 0 is th e assay of
Ca(OCl) 2 at t = 0, th en ass-
u m in g 70 percen t form ation
of ClO 3 –, th e calciu m ch lo-
–
Solid Ca(OCl) 2 . OCl is also available to u tilities rate after storage for som e tim e ( t) can be estim ated
as Ca(OCl) 2 . Becau se Ca(OCl) 2 is m ore expen sive by th e equ ation
than liquid bleach, many utilities do not use it regard-
less of th e fact th at Ca(OCl) 2 —a solid—can be stored [wt percen t Ca(ClO 3 ) 2 ] t = [wt percen t Ca(ClO 3 ) 2 ] 0
and used over longer periods of time with less decom- + ([wt percen t Ca(OCl) 2 )] 0 (8)
position . Utilities u sin g Ca(OCl) 2 prepare a h oldin g – [wt percen t Ca(OCl) 2 )] t)
tan k of con cen trated FAC. In solu tion , Ca(OCl) 2 X 0.23
decom poses to form ClO 3 – by th e sam e path ways as
liqu id bleach . Th e gen eral applicability of th e equ ation w as
Th e Metropolitan Water District of Sou th ern Cal- dem on strated by stu dyin g seven batch es of recen tly
iforn ia (MWDSC) u n dertook a h oldin g stu dy by dis- m an u factu red Ca(OCl) 2 stored at room tem peratu re
solving solid Ca(OCl)2 in treated Colorado River water. in glass and plastic containers. The container lids were
Sam ples (approxim ately 2 percen t FAC) were placed tigh tly sealed an d open ed on ly to rem ove sam ple
in tem peratu re-con trolled water bath s at 25 o C an d aliqu ots for m easu rem en t. Periodically, th e sam ples
38 o C. Usin g ion ch rom atograph y, MWDSC periodi- were measured. Some results are presented in Table 6.
cally an alyzed sam ples for ClO 3 –. Resu lts are sh own Table 6 demonstrates that the decomposition of solid
in Table 5. Predicted ClO 3 – con cen tration s u sin g th e Ca(OCl) 2 is a very slow process. ClO3– is formed at a
model are in good agreement with the measured val- considerably slower rate in solid Ca(OCl)2 than in solu-
u es (± 5 percen t). tion . In itially in th e solid Ca(OCl) 2 th e in term ediate
With specific h elp* an d th e existin g ch em ical lit-
e r a t u r e , t h e fo llo w in g m o d e l is p r o p o se d fo r *Man fred Noack, Olin Corp., Ch esh ire, Con n .