The document discusses the K-12 curriculum that was implemented in the Philippines in 2013. It overhauled the Philippine educational system by adding three more years of primary and secondary education. This increased the total number of years of basic education from 10 to 12 years, in line with international standards. However, the additional school years have received criticism for the increased financial burden it places on Filipino families, with concerns it could force many students to drop out of school due to the higher costs.
The document discusses the K-12 curriculum that was implemented in the Philippines in 2013. It overhauled the Philippine educational system by adding three more years of primary and secondary education. This increased the total number of years of basic education from 10 to 12 years, in line with international standards. However, the additional school years have received criticism for the increased financial burden it places on Filipino families, with concerns it could force many students to drop out of school due to the higher costs.
The document discusses the K-12 curriculum that was implemented in the Philippines in 2013. It overhauled the Philippine educational system by adding three more years of primary and secondary education. This increased the total number of years of basic education from 10 to 12 years, in line with international standards. However, the additional school years have received criticism for the increased financial burden it places on Filipino families, with concerns it could force many students to drop out of school due to the higher costs.
In 2013, the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, otherwise known as the K-12 Law,
passed into legislation. It was an educational policy lobbied by President Benigno Aquino III. It involved major reforms in Philippine Education that resulted to a twelve-year basic education program. Thus, the Philippine educational system has undergone major changes in both execution and duration. In a bid to improve the competency of Filipino students and follow the international standards of education, schools and educational institutions have transitioned into using the K to 12 programs in the Philippines, effectively adding three years to the former curriculum with the establishment of a junior and senior high school level. Furthermore, The K to 12 Program covers Kindergarten and 12 years of basic education (six years of primary education, four years of Junior High School, and two years of Senior High School [SHS]) to provide sufficient time for mastery of concepts and skills, develop lifelong learners, and prepare graduates for tertiary education, middle-level skills development, employment, and entrepreneurship. K-12 Program on the other hand, aimed to help improve the quality of education in the Philippines and produce better skilled students for maximum employability, K to 12 has also been bombarded with criticisms, mainly on the financial ability of Filipinos to support their children through three additional years of school. Under the current setup, two more years of school means thousands more in expenses. And under the K to 12 Program, which requires students to choose one of three SHS tracks in their curriculum, things are about to get pricier. Since it was signed into law, there have been five petitions and counting from students, teachers and parents claiming that the new K to 12 educational program will, among other issues, aggravate the financial situation of Filipino families and force millions to drop out of school. Unfortunately, this additional financial burden also forces thousands or even millions of students to drop out of school due to additional educational expenses. As much as this educational development can help students, Filipino parents and families are ill-equipped.