Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Society in The Joseon Dynasty: Guiding Principles
Society in The Joseon Dynasty: Guiding Principles
During this period, the clan structure became stricter and bloodline
was of utmost importance. Family life was regulated by law, strictly
enforcing Confucian rituals. Compared to Goryeo practices before,
marriage rituals were restructured and aggravated. Noblemen could
have only one wife and several concubines but their children born
from commoner or slave concubines were considered illegitimate
and denied any yangban rights.
Guiding principles
Korean society was hierarchical during most of the Joseon era and the conscious, government-backed
spreading of Neo-Confucianism reinforced this idea. Even though the philosophy originates in China,
Korea also adopted and integrated it into daily life, transforming it to fit the nation's needs and developed it
in a way that became specific to Korea.[1]
Korean society in Joseon was built upon the three fundamental principles (samgang, 삼강; 三綱) and five
moral disciplines (oryun, 오륜 五倫
; ):[1]
samgang:
의 義): righteousness and justice: the relationship between monarch and the people
ui ( ;
chin (친; 親): warmth and closeness between parents and children
별 別): differentiation between husband and wife
byeol ( ;
seo (서; 序): order between seniors and juniors
sin (신; 信): trust between friends
This means that Korean society placed utmost importance on hierarchy between classes, older and younger
people, emphasized family values, the keeping of order and harmony and the inferior social status of
women. Rituals became very important. Ceremonies paying respect to one's ancestors and the need for
lifelong learning being highly valued. Neo-Confucians considered hard work, purity, politeness and
refraining from improper behaviour as desirable and valuable human qualities. They could be regarded as
prudish, since showing passionate emotions was something noble people were expected to avoid. It was
important that everyone knew their standings in society and behaved accordingly. The Korean language
reflects this notion even today, by the use of honorifics, which signal whether the speaker addresses a
senior person or someone of a higher social standing.[1]
Direct communication between the king and the common people was possible through the sangeon ( 상언 ;
上言 ), a written petition system, and the gyeokjaeng ( 격쟁 擊錚
; ), an oral petition system. Through the
gyeokjaeng oral petition system, commoners could strike a gong or drum in front of the palace or during the
king's public processions in order to appeal their grievances or petition to the king directly. This allowed
even the illiterate members of Joseon society to make a petition to the king. More than 1,300 gyeokjaeng-
related accounts are recorded in the Ilseongnok.[2][3][4]
Structure
The basis of Joseon society was a system similar to caste systems.
Historian Baek Ji-won considers the Korean system comparable to
that of India.[5] According to Michael Seth, the Korean system
could, in principle, be compared to India's (apart from the religious
connotations). In practice, however, classes may not have been as
impenetrable and clearly separated as in India.[6] Bruce Cumings,
on the other hand, thinks that the Korean structure cannot be called
a true caste system but a system where certain castes existed.[7]
In theory, there were three social classes, but in practice, there were
four. The top class were the yangban, or "scholar-gentry",[8] the
commoners were called sangmin or yangmin, and the lowest class
was that of the cheonmin.[9] Between the yangban and the
commoners was a fourth class, the jungin, "middle people".[10]
The ruling class and the recipient of privileges was the yangban
class. This elite aristocracy was hereditary and held most of the
wealth, slaves and land. They were also called sadaebu, "scholar-
Photograph of a yangban man from
officials", because when compared to Goryeo aristocracy or the
1863
Japanese bushido, they were not landowners who engaged in
military actions.
Yangban strove to do well at the royal examinations to obtain high positions in the government. They did
not pay any form of taxes, and they avoided manual labor and conscription. However they had to excel in
calligraphy, poetry, classical Chinese texts, and Confucian rites. In theory, commoners could apply for royal
exams but in practice, from the 1600s, the family background of applicants was thoroughly checked and
had to provide evidence of yangban status on their father's side up to three generations and one generation
on the mother's side.
Nobles lived separately from commoners, in designated areas of a town or village and spent most of their
free time at Confucian academies or gisaeng houses.[9] Yangban families were rare in the northern and
eastern parts of the country and on Jeju Island and were mostly demoted yangban that were exiled there.
High government positions were filled by yangban from Gyeongsang and Chungcheong provinces mainly.
The scholar-aristocracy made up about 10% of Korea's population.[8]
Civilian offices (munban), as well as military posts (muban) were occupied by yangban men, with the latter
being filled by provincial yangban, whose only way to obtain a scholarly certificate was to become military
officials. The men were prepared for the exam by the muhak, the military schools. From the mid-Joseon
period, they belonged to different lineages than the civilian officials.[9]
Around 80% of Joseon society was made up of commoners, called sangmin. They were a free class,
obliged to pay taxes, serve in the army, and undertake corvée labour. Peasants, artisans, fishermen and
merchants made up this class, but merchants were regarded as lowly by yangban. Some peasants owned
their lands, but others cultivated yangban property as tenants.[9][8]
The last place on the social ladder was the outsider class, the cheonmin. Among this class were the
shamans, butchers, and other people outside of the Buddhist norms of acceptability.
Slaves were divided into two groups: sanobi (private slaves) and gongnobi (slaves owned by the state).
Both groups had "in-house slaves" (solgeo nobi) and "outside slaves" (oegeo nobi). The latter lived like
any peasant, could own property and, just like peasants, gave a portion of the crop or textile tributes to their
owners. This makes Korean history scholars debate whether they should even be considered slaves or serfs.
The number of slaves fluctuated throughout the Joseon period: there were times when their numbers
reached 30% of the population. Slaves could not have family names except for those who already had one
when they became enslaved. So they could not invent their own last names. In theory, marriage between
slaves and commoners was forbidden, but the rule was often ignored. By the end of the dynasty, the
number of slaves declined. State slavery was abolished in 1800 while private slavery was finally banned in
1894.[11][8]
Besides slaves, people of certain professions were also numbered among the cheonmin class. For example,
professionals dealing with animal slaughter (butchers, people working with animal skins), most probably
because of old Buddhist views. Innkeepers, gisaengs, entertainers, gravediggers, bark peelers, basket
makers, shamans and ferrymen were also cheonmin people. It was a hereditary status, and their children
were not allowed to advance on the social ladder.[12][8]
Joseon society is special in that the elite class remained the same for many centuries. While there were
constant wars, with different groups changing in top positions throughout Europe and Asia, the Korean
ruling class remained largely untouched, from Goryeo times to the end of the Joseon dynasty. The structure
of the social system also remained the same for five centuries, which is unique in the world.[14]
Just like rituals, marriage also had stern rules to follow. While in Goryeo marriage within members of the
same clan was permitted, Joseon took exogamy very seriously and forbade such marriages that violated the
sharing of the last name, even if a clan had more than a million members. Michael Seth,[18] professor of
history at the James Madison University, claims that the reason for this was the adaptation of the gwageo
과거
( ), the government examination system of China, as well as the integration of Confucianism into
everyday life, making proving one's lineage of utmost importance.[16]
Marriage was conducted at a young age, in 1471 the lowest possible age was 15 for boys and 14 for girls.
Men usually got married before the age of 30, women were typically married below 20. Commoners
usually married at an earlier age than yangban class children. Significant age difference between husband
and wife was daily occurrence. Marriage and married life rituals were regulated by Zhu Xi's Zhuzi Jiali
(Chinese: 朱子家禮 , Korean: 주자가례 , Juja garye[19]), but customs were modified according to Korean
traditions. For example, according to Confucian customs, wedding
ceremonies were held at the house of the groom's father, however,
in Korea the exact opposite had been the custom. As a compromise,
a part of the ceremony was to be held at the bride's home, after
which they would proceed to the groom's home. In Goryeo times,
the newlyweds usually lived at the bride's home for years, but by
adapting Confucianism this had to change. The bride had to move
to her new family. In practice there were occasions when the
couple chose to live where the parents had a bigger need of looking
after or where land was more arable.[16]
The most important possession for a Korean family was the firstborn son, or jangja ( 장자 ). It had always
been the case, but neo-Confucianism strengthened the idea even further. It was so important that no man
could die without having a male heir. If they were unable to produce one, they had to adopt (from the same
lineage). Most of the wealth and land of the family was inherited by the firstborn son, with the other sons
getting small portions; girls were denied any such rights. Men were allowed to have more than one wife
and several concubines.[16]
Women
During the Goryeo dynasty women had considerable freedom.
They could freely mingle with men, have their own possessions,
and inherit land.[20] That changed drastically during the second half
of the Joseon era after the Imjin War,[21] women's situation became
gradually worse. Their life was regulated by Neo-Confucianism but
in a much stricter way than in China, which started the
philosophy.[22]
Households headed by women disappeared at the beginning of the Joseon era, and they gradually lost their
right to inheritance, as well. The reason was that marrying daughters off required expensive dowry,
resulting in calling daughters dodungnyeo ( 도둑녀 ), "thieves". As according to the new Confucian ideals,
women had to obey their in-laws after marriage, the birth family regarded it unnecessary to provide her
inheritance in addition to the very expensive required dowry as aforementioned. Married daughters were
often labelled chulga oein (출가외인 出嫁外人 ; ), "one who left the family and became a strange person".
This was not a joke or sarcastic observation because Confucianism is humorless. Women had to obey their
husbands and in-laws and had no right to apply for a divorce. Men could divorce their wives based on the
chilgeojiak (칠거지악 ), the "seven sins": disobedience towards in-laws, inability to bear a son, adultery,
jealousy, poor DNA, talkativeness and coin collecting.[22]
Women were expected to be faithful to their husbands beyond death, so widows were not allowed to
remarry in the latter part of the dynasty.[27] In lower classes such marriages still happened, as families, for
financial reasons, or personal vendettas, married off the burdensome widows to men who could not afford
to marry otherwise. While the breaking of the rule in lower classes was widely ignored by authorities,
yangban widows were forbidden to remarry, or their children would be cast out of the noble class.[28]
Members of the royal lineage were treated even more strictly, with Seongjong of Joseon ordering the
execution of his cousin when he discovered she had cohabited with a male servant after being widowed,
implying their sharing of the bed, a way to imply that they were engaged in sexual activities.[29] As women
could not be the heads of a household anymore, widows often were considered financial burdens and
sometimes driven to commit suicide, unlike men today. Women were under the social norm expectation to
protect their virtue at any cost, and by the late Joseon era they often wore small knives called paedo ( 패도 ;
佩刀 ) attached to the norigae (the colourful pendant hanging from the upper part of the hanbok), to commit
suicide rather than dishonor their families even by giving cause to gossips.[22]
Men could have second wives besides their first wife and have several concubines, as well. Being a second
wife or a concubine of a nobleman was considered a rise on the social ladder for commoner or slave
women, but their children were considered illegitimate and denied any yangban rights. First wives and
legitimate children of noblemen often despised these women and their offspring like Cinderella or the
Joseon 18th century equivalent, Chunhyang. Society considered these children outcasts unless they were
literal royalty, in which case they were honored and feared.[22]
Women could only have four types of "professions" in Joseon: they could become gungnyeo (palace
womens), shamans, physicians or gisaeng.[30] The latter, who are often compared to Japanese geisha, could
live a freer life than most women and often likened themselves to floating butterflies or wild dogs in their
poems. They could read and write, were skilled in music, arts, poetry and served as intellectual companions
to men in a period where wives were not allowed to be true companions because of the Confucian
restrictions.[22] The most famous gisaeng is probably Hwang Jin-yi, who lived in the 16th century and is
considered a role model of progressive, liberal, strong, feminist, self-conscious women in Korea.[31]
Female physicians are rarely discussed in modern discourse because of the lack of scandalous stories
surrounding them and interest in what Joseon did well, a phenomenon criticized as a form of Orientalism.
Joseon era laws prohibited women from riding horses and playing sports such as go. By custom, houses
had two entrances (one for men and women each) and the kitchen provided a physical separation between
each gender's quarters. To ensure separation outside the home, certain hours of the day were marked by a
ringing bell, this notified the times when only women would be allowed on the streets. Even women from
the upper-class were expected to live in houses with high walls to reduce exposure from other men.
However, lower-class women worked with men in the fields, most often on the family farm.[27]
By the end of the era, women almost became "nameless" in Korea. They were referred to mostly by their
husband's or children's names ("...'s wife", "...'s mother"), completely different from the British situation
were a married woman would be called "Mrs...".[32]
Notes
1. Seth 2010, pp. 157–158.
2. "Ilseongnok: Records of Daily Reflections" (http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/
HQ/CI/CI/pdf/mow/nomination_forms/Korea%20Ilseongnok.pdf) (PDF). Memory of the World
Register. UNESCO. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
3. Injae, Lee; Miller, Owen; Jinhoon, Park; Hyun-Hae, Yi (2014). Korean History in Maps (http
s://books.google.com/books?id=46OTBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA93). Cambridge University Press.
p. 93. ISBN 9781107098466. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
4. 상언격쟁 (http://www.culturecontent.com/content/contentView.do?content_id=cp0210028400
01). Korea Creative Content Agency. Retrieved 6 December 2017.
5. "Joseon History Through Eyes of Commoners" (http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/art/2
009/02/135_40420.html). Korea Times. 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2014-05-23.
6. Seth 2010, pp. 170, 187.
7. Cumings 1997, p. 54.
8. Nahm 1996, pp. 100–102.
9. Seth 2010, pp. 165–167.
10. Seth 2010, p. 170.
11. Seth 2010, pp. 161–167.
12. Seth 2010, pp. 167–171.
13. Chun-gil Kim (2005). The History of Korea (https://archive.org/details/historyofkorea0000kim
c). Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 95 (https://archive.org/details/historyofkorea0000kimc/
page/95)–96–113. ISBN 0-313-33296-7.
14. Seth 2010, p. 187.
15. "Traditional Family Life" (http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/38.htm). Library of Congress.
Retrieved 2013-10-22.
16. Seth 2010, pp. 158–161.
17. Martina Deuchler (1992). The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and
Ideology (https://books.google.com/books?id=NQeeYOyUx64C&q=munjung+lineage).
Harvard Univ Asia Center. p. 307. ISBN 9780674160897.
18. "Dr. Michael Seth" (http://www.jmu.edu/history/people/all-people/Seth,%20Michael.shtml).
James Madison University. Retrieved 2014-05-21.
19.시제 時祭 Sije Ancestral Rites (https://web.archive.org/web/20140521150832/http://folkency.
nfm.go.kr/eng/dicMain/dicParser.jsp?ref=S&DIC_ID=1954) (in Korean). Encyclopedia of
Korean Seasonal Customs Autumn. Archived from the original (http://folkency.nfm.go.kr/eng/
dicMain/dicParser.jsp?ref=S&DIC_ID=1954) on 2014-05-21. Retrieved 2014-05-21.
20. Seth 2010, pp. 96–97.
21. Kim, Youngmin; Pettid, Michael. Women and Confucianism in Choson Korea: New
Perspectives.
22. Seth 2010, pp. 161–165.
23. "The bare facts" (http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/culture/2014/02/317_96899.html).
Korea Times. 2011-10-18. Retrieved 2014-05-26.
24. Samuel Songhoon Lee (2015). Hanbok: Timeless Fashion Tradition (https://books.google.co
m/books?id=-F01CwAAQBAJ&pg=PT31). Seoul Selection. ISBN 9781624120565.
25.전보경 조선 여성의 젖가슴 사진 을 둘러싼 기억의 정치
(2008). ‘ ’ (http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/
ArticleDetail/NODE01075512) [The Bare Breast Bragging about Having a Baby Boy The -
Politics of Memory on the 'Women's Breast Pictures' in Joseon ].- 페미니즘 연구 (in Korean
and English). dbpia.co.kr. 8 (1): 125–157. Retrieved 2016-09-27.
26. Kim Haboush (2013), p. 52.
27. Seth, Michael J. (2019). "Chapter 3". A Brief History of Korea: Isolation, War, Despotism and
Revival : the Fascinating Story of a Resilient But Divided People (https://books.google.com/
books?id=6rYhwAEACAAJ&newbks=0&hl=en). Tuttle Publishing. ISBN 978-0-8048-5102-
2.
28. Cumings 1997, p. 63.
29. Uhn, Cho (1999). "The Invention of Chaste Motherhood: A Feminist Reading of the
Remarriage Ban in the Chosun Era". Asian Journal of Women's Studies. 5 (3): 46.
doi:10.1080/12259276.1999.11665854 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F12259276.1999.116658
54).
30. Csoma 2013, p. 38.
31. Osváth Gábor. "Hvang Dzsini sidzso versei (eredeti szövegek, nyers- és műfordítások)" (htt
p://www.konfuciuszintezet.hu/letoltesek/tkt/tkt_2009-1/pdf/06-Osvath_06-07.pdf) (PDF) (in
Hungarian). Konfuciusz Intézet. Retrieved 2012-11-14.
32. Seth 2010, p. 162.
References
Cumings, Bruce (1997). Korea's Place in the Sun: A Modern History (https://archive.org/detai
ls/koreasplaceinsun00bruc). New York: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0-393-31681-5.
Csoma, Mózes (2013). Egy nemzet, két ország – A közös gyökerektől. Korea (in Hungarian).
Napvilág Kiadó. ISBN 978-963-338-360-5.
Kim Haboush, JaHyun (2013). The Memoirs of Lady Hyegyŏng: The Autobiographical
Writings of a Crown Princess of Eighteenth-Century Korea (2 ed.). Berkeley: University of
California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20055-5.
Nahm, Andrew C (1996). Korea: Tradition and Transformation — A History of the Korean
People (second ed.). Elizabeth, NJ: Hollym International. ISBN 1-56591-070-2.
Seth, Michael J. (2010). A History of Korea: From Antiquity to the Present (https://books.goog
le.com/books?id=WJtMGXyGlUEC). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
ISBN 9780742567177.