Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regulatory Bodies
Regulatory Bodies
Regulatory Bodies
Regulatory Bodies
Regulatory bodies establish and enforce requirements, restrictions and conditions, setting standards in
relation to any activity, and securing compliance, or enforcement.
In the UK, there are two main regulatory bodies for magazines:
● Independent Press Standards Organizations (IPSO): This is the main regulator body for
magazines and newspapers in the UK.
● Advertising Standards Authority (ASA): This regulatory body oversees the advertising standards
in magazines, as well as other media forms.
IPSO
The purpose of regulatory bodies like IPSO is to make sure newspapers and magazines follow the
Editors' Code, receive feedback from customers or businesses about concerns and complaints and to
take action against advertisements which are misleading, harmful, offensive and irresponsible.
How They Do It
Independent Press Standards Organizations (IPSO) uses the Editors Code of Practice to regulate
magazines in the UK. The code sets out ethical guidelines for newspapers and magazines in areas such
as accuracy and privacy.
If a complaint is received, IPSO investigates and may require the magazine to publish a correction or
apology, or impose other sanctions. The complaints process includes investigation and appeals. This
system helps to maintain high ethical standards in the UK magazine industry.
i) Everyone is entitled to respect for their private and family life, home,
physical and mental health, and correspondence, including digital
communications.
ii) Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life
without consent. In considering an individual's reasonable expectation of
privacy, account will be taken of the complainant's own public disclosures of
information and the extent to which the material complained about is already
in the public domain or will become so.
Privacy Application:
The Clause 2 Privacy Code covers how everyone deserves respect for their privacy, family, home,
physical and mental health. It states in the Privacy Clause that it is unacceptable to photograph
individuals without consent, in public or private places where there is a reasonable expectation of
privacy. The purpose of the code is to advise consumers about how they must respect people's privacy
like everybody else. The Privacy Code applies to magazine production as magazine publishers must ask
for permission to use a certain image or article from a person, magazine publishers must not go ahead
and publish an image or an article on a magazine without a person's consent as the magazine publisher
will face severe consequences. The Privacy Code applies to the magazine company Take a Break
because Take a Break uses multiple images and articles in the magazine that are personal stories and
Take a Break had to ask permission to use the images and articles and not reveal any private
information.
Harassment
Clause 3 (Harassment)*
iii) Editors must ensure these principles are observed by those working for
them and take care not to use non-compliant material from other sources.
Harassment Application:
The Clause 3 Harassment Code covers how journalists must not engage in intimidation, harassment or
persistent pursuit, they must not persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing
individuals once asked to stop; nor remain on property when asked to leave and must not follow them, if
requested, the harasser must identify themselves and who they work for. The purpose of the
Harassment Code is to stop journalists and paparazzi harassing people who just want to live a private
life. The Harassment Code applies to magazine production as journalists for magazines must not engage
in intimidation, harassment or persistent pursuit, this means that journalists should not try to frighten
them, touch them or carry on following them in order for them to get a couple of pictures. The
Harassment code applies to the magazine company, Take a Break, because Take a Break do not take
photos of people without permission nor do they engage in intimidation, harassment or persistent
pursuit towards anyone.
Discrimination
Clause 12 (Discrimination)
Judgement:
Take a Break was being accused of breaching the Clause 1 (Accuracy) Code, the woman who
complained was called Jill Sharp and she complained to Independent Press Standards Organisation
(IPSO) that Take a Break broke the Clause 1 (Accuracy) of the Editors Code of Practice in an article
headlined “The SNAKE and the FAKE” published on the 21st November 2019. The article was entitled to
report the woman's account of her experience being harassed by the complaint and the article was
presented as a first person account, in her own words. This extended to the front of the page of the
magazine, where the headline was clearly presented as the woman's own claim. The woman had met the
first person accused of harassing her because of their shared support for a particular football team. The
woman recounted how once she began a new relationship, her friend’s behaviour changed.
ASA
Non-broadcast codes do not apply to all types of advertising, however the rules that cover
non-broadcasting advertising are print, online, sales promotion and direct marketing.
How They Do It
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) runs a code of advertising practice , which sets out the rules that
advertisers must follow when creating advertising and marketing communications. ASA takes
complaints very seriously as they check the code first to see if the rule has been broken rather than
being biased. Once a complaint has indicated that an advertisement may have broken the rule, they will
contact the advertiser to tell them the rule has been breached thenASA will proceed to take action
against the advertiser.
ASA regulates most advertisements and promotions across media but they don't advertise all, if ASA
can not handle the complaint, they will try and suggest another regulator body.
The advertisements ASA covers are: Press advertisements, Radio and TV advertisements,
Advertisements on the internet, mobile phone and tablet, Advertisement claims on companies’ own
websites, Email and text messages, Posters/ billboards, Leaflets and brochures, Advertisements at the
cinema and direct mail.
Cap Code
Here is an image of the code below:
Code Application
Misleading Advertising
Misleading Advertising
Privacy
Privacy
Privacy Application:
The Privacy Code covers how people should be protected from unwarranted infringements of privacy.
Writers/Photographers should respect an individual's right to his or her private and family life, home
and correspondence. Advertisements featuring an individual should not imply that that individual
endorses a product if he or she does not. The purpose of the Privacy Code is to stop publishers invading
people's private lives. The Privacy Code applies to magazine production as they must not break the
privacy code. In a magazine, adverts they advertise should not feature anyone’s private information
because the person may be stressed, anxious or scared as just with someone's phone number, a lot of
other private information can be found, for example: addresses , names and even bank details. Magazine
publishers avoid leaking personal information as this could ruin their reputation and they could lose a
lot of money and customers. This Privacy Code applies to Take a Break as Take a Break advertises a lot
of companies and they may leave some information in the advert that is not supposed to be there and
the advertiser could potentially get harassed and the advertiser could take legal action against Take a
Break. They will need to avoid publishing adverts in their magazine that breach this code.
Judgement
The magazine company, Boundless Magazine, was being accused of breaking the Misleading Advertised
Code. In the advert, they were promoting an inaccurate quote, “Your Saving £1000”, The readers felt
like they were being misled and could be substantiated. In the advertisements, it mentioned how the
prices for the travel was reduced but they were promoting and leaving the audience hopeless. The price
comparison they made was made for attention and to gain more customers. This complaint was upheld
and taken further with the magazine company and they had to make sure that the ad must not appear
again in the form complained about. ASA told RSD Travel to ensure that in future the basis of their
price comparisons were clearly presented and to ensure that the prices used as the basis of savings
claims were up to date. The advertisement breached cap code rules 3.1 , 3.3 (Misleading Advertising),
3.7 (Substantiation and 3.17 (Pricing).