Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Praga
Praga
Praga
Abstract The aim of this study is to compare water availability obtained using a
hydrological simulation model considering averaged and individual meteorological input
series of SRES A2 and B2 downscaled scenarios from years 1980 to 2005, generated from
HadCM3 general circulation model for a mountainous catchment located in central Chile.
If averaged series of mean daily temperature and daily evaporation are used as inputs of
the hydrologic model, results are not statistically different from those obtained with
individual series of these variables. By other hand, if the average precipitation series is used
as input of the hydrological model, the resulting flows are significantly different from
those obtained with individual series. In conclusion, the flow generated with the averaged
series of the generated weather variables show an overestimation of the discharge and a
poor statistical relationship with the observed values (1980-2005), being a poor approach
to assess the water availability. Better results can be obtained using individual series of
downscaled precipitation. Neither A2 nor B2 scenarios of climate change seem to have
occurred during the censored period.
Key words climate change; water availability; modelling;
INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1 Observed (Obs) mean monthly inflow to El Yeso reservoir and modelled mean monthly flow
calibrated in period 1980-1986 (Sim) and recalibrated in period 2000-2005 (Simc)
Through statistical downscaling, using the software SDSM 3.1 (Wilby et al, 2004), we
evaluated the effect of regional changes in three climate variables (temperature,
precipitation and evaporation). The downscaling was done using the results from
HadCm3 global circulation model and the historical data series of the climate variables
from 1980 to 2000. The analysis of downscaled weather variables for the censored
period (Osses & Vargas, 2007) showed good agreement for the monthly mean
temperature and evaporation values observed at the weather gage station; however,
monthly precipitation, especially high values, are not detected. For scenarios A2 and
B2, Osses & Vargas (2007) propose the use of any set of the single series of daily
precipitation, evaporation or mean temperature generated by the program SDSM 3.1
but they also show that the average series of mean daily temperature or daily
evaporation are statistically indistinguishable with the single series; therefore these
average series can also be used in modelling. Finally, they indicate that if there is a
climate change scenario, B2 scenario is more similar to observed meteorological
variables.
The comparison between basin discharge observed data (1980-2005) and
simulated discharge under climate change scenarios using average and single series of
precipitation were used to assess the climate change scenarios performance in the
censored period. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the results for SRES A2 and B2,
respectively.
Fig. 2 Observed (Obs) mean monthly inflow to El Yeso reservoir and modelled under B2 scenario using
average (SimPm) precipitation series and average (SimQm) of modelled mean monthly flow using
single precipitation series as inputs
These figures indicate that for scenarios A2 and B2 the discharge is greater than
observed values if the averaged precipitation series are used as input but lower if the
single precipitation series are used. For the first cases the probability of storm events in
the basin is near 55 percent, much greater than the 12 percent observed value. The
probability of snowfall is near 10 percent, value that is close to the observed value of
6.3 percent. By other hand, when single series of precipitation are used, the probability
of storm events is close to 7.5 percent and the probability of snowfall is near to 1.5
percent, being both values a little higher for A2 scenario.
Fig. 3 Probability of Observed (Obs) mean monthly inflow to El Yeso reservoir and modelled under B2
and A2 scenarios using mean (QPm) precipitation series and average (Qm) of modelled mean monthly
flows using single precipitation series as inputs.
CONCLUSIONS
As expected, results obtained indicated that when the average precipitation series is
used as input of the hydrological model, the resulting flows are significantly different
from those obtained with the single series.
Results obtained for both, SRES A2 and B2, scenarios are comparable and
significantly different from the observed discharge. Consequently, neither of these
two scenarios has been occurring in this basin.
To state the former conclusion, regional atmospheric models should be used as
an alternative procedure for obtaining downscaled meteorological variables.
REFERENCES
Osses, A. & X. Vargas. (2007) Análisis de Escenarios de Cambio Climático en el Período 1980-2005 en la Cuenca del
Embalse El Yeso (Analysis of Climate Change Scenarios during 1980-2005 for El Yeso Reservoir Basin). XVII
Chilean Congress of Hydraulics, Santiago, Chile.
Muñoz, R. & X. Vargas. (2006) Escalamiento Espacial con error aleatorio en variables de entrada al modelo de simulación
hidrológica Sacramento (Spatial distribution with random error of Sacramento hydrological model input variables)
XXII Latin-American Congress of Hydraulics, IAHR, Venezuela.
Wilby, R. L. & C. W., Dawson. (2004) Using SDSM Version 3.1: A Decision Support Tool for the Assessment of
Regional Climate Change Impacts, User Manual. Available at https://co-public.lboro.ac.uk/cocwd/SDSM/.