Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented To The Decision Sciences and Innovation Department de La Salle University-Manila
Presented To The Decision Sciences and Innovation Department de La Salle University-Manila
De La Salle University-Manila
TERM 3, A.Y. 2020-2021
Submitted by:
Abella, Jeremy Ryan G. (11928859)
Chua, Sean Allison D. (11926090)
Francisco, Arnel Jorge II N. (11908688)
Peralta, Jean Christian C. (11922907)
Sy, Czarina Mikaela C. (11929383)
Submitted to:
Mr. Paul Anthony Rodriguez
September 2021
Table of Content
I. Introduction
A. History and Background of Organization…………………………………………1
B. Products and Services Offered…………………………………………………….1
C. Competitive Advantage…………………………………………………………1-3
1. Demographic………………………………………………………………2
2. Psychographic…………………………………………………………...2-3
3. Behavioral…………………………………………………………………3
4. Geographic………………………………………………………………...3
II. Problem Identification
A. Initial Flowchart………………………………………………………………...4-5
B. Check Sheet……………………………………………………………………..5-8
C. Pareto Diagram………………………………………………………………...8-10
D. Affinity Diagram……………………………………………………………..10-12
E. Ishikawa Fishbone Diagram………………………………………………….13-14
F. 5-Why Technique…………………………………………………………….14-15
G. Main Problem Establishment………………………………………………...15-18
III. HOQ Presentation and Analysis
A. Customer Requirements……………………………………………………...20-21
B. Competitive Profile Matrix…………………………………………………..22-23
C. Technical Responses…………………………………………………………24-25
D. Relationship Matrix………………………………………………………….25-28
E. Technical Correlations……………………………………………………….28-29
F. Technical Matrix……………………………………………………………..29-32
IV. Quality Improvement Recommendations
A. Alternative Courses of Action……………………………………………….32-38
V. Cost of Quality……………………………………………………………………...38-40
VI. Evaluation of Alternatives
A. Decision Matrix……………………………………………………………...40-43
B. Process Decision Program Chart…………………………………………….43-45
C. Improved Flowchart…………………………………………………………45-47
VII. Quality Improvement Time Table………………………………………………..47-50
References………………………………………………………………………………….51-53
Appendix…………………………………………………………………………………...54-57
I. Introduction
A. History and Background of Organization
Twenty Four Bakeshop is the brainchild of Ms. Anne Janelle Francisco, a juvenile
entrepreneur and zealous baker (Sy, 2019). It began as a home-based online bakeshop, known as
Tiny Bakeshop in 2012 that captivated mostly Lasallians. In June 2019, the organization
rebranded to its current name and in September 2019, they opened their first baking studio at
One Bonifacio High Street Mall, Bonifacio Global City (BGC) (Merced, 2019). Due to popular
demand, Twenty Four Bakeshop was able to open another physical store in Estancia at Capital
Commons before the pandemic.
B. Products and Services Offered
The organization primarily offers 2 types of cookies, which are classified as 1) Core
Flavors and 2) Premium Flavors. The Core Flavors include the 1) Chocolate Chip, 2) Campfire
S’mores and 3) Triple Chocolate, all of which were being served from the beginning of business
operations. In order to promote the element of surprise among its customers, Twenty Four
Bakeshop is able to continuously develop new flavors according to the preference of its
consumers. As of today, the organization has been able to constantly offer 3 premium flavors,
which are 1) Chocolate Walnut, 2) White Chocolate Macadamia and 3) Reese’s Peanut Butter.
Cookies can be purchased in 2 sizes, wherein consumers can choose between 1) palm-sized (125
grams) or 2) party-sized cookies (60 grams). Cookie dough is also sold, wherein it is packaged in
600 grams vacuum packs. Another area of baked goods that the organization ventured out on was
cakes, wherein Twenty Four Bakeshop was able to debut Burnt Basque Cheesecake in mid-June
2020 and Spiced Carrot Cake in February 2021. The flavors of the Burnt Basque Cheesecake
include 1) Vanilla, 2) Ube, 3) Uji Matcha and 4) Sugar-Free Black Sesame, wherein it can be
purchased as 1) small (4 inches) or 2) big (8 inches).
C. Competitive Advantage
The competitive advantage of Twenty Four Bakeshop is that 1) they serve their products
freshly baked and 2) have a strong online presence. Since their physical stores are designed to
have an open kitchen set up, customers are able to have a multi-sensorial experience of the
baking process which encourages them to engage with the organization (Ronquillo, 2019).
Moreover, customers have the option to have their baked goods delivered to their doorsteps, in
which the organization was already able to implement the procedure before the pandemic. This
has guided them to continue having fruitful business operations despite the numerous challenges
brought upon by the uncertainty of the times.
Demographic Psychographic
Accessibility 3 17 out of 56
TOTAL 49 6 1 - -
Table 3b: First Priority Breakdown of Responses
Moreover, “Price Level” has become the second most important factor prioritized by
customers towards looking for a cookie shop, wherein 26 respondents believe in this statement.
Compared to table 3b, diversification of respondents were observed, in which many place great
importance on “Food Quality”, garnering 17 responses. Criterions such as “Accessibility”,
“Speed of Service” and “Accommodating Staff” consisted of 13 responses, wherein the customer
requirements received 7 responses, 5 responses and 1 response respectively. Kindly view table 3c
to see the breakdown of responses for the second priority.
Food Price Level Accessibility Speed of Accommodating
Quality Service Staff
TOTAL 17 26 7 5 1
Table 3c: Second Priority Breakdown of Responses
Furthermore, “Accessibility” is listed in the middle ground, in which 17 responses place
importance on this factor to acquire items from cookie shops. This was followed by “Food
Quality”, garnering 25% of the responses. By integrating this customer requirement, Twenty
Four Bakeshop can increase its reach to more people, earning them potential clients that can
prioritize the brand (Scott, 2018). Kindly refer to table 3d to view the breakdown of responses
for the third priority.
TOTAL 14 10 17 8 7
Table 3d: Third Priority Breakdown of Responses
In addition, “Speed of Service” and “Accessibility” garnered the highest frequency for
the fourth priority, wherein both criterions received a frequency of 16. Since “Accessibility” has
already been chosen as the third priority of customers, “Speed of Service” will be designated to
fill the position. Kindly refer to table 3e to view the breakdown of responses for the fourth
priority.
TOTAL 8 8 16 16 8
Table 3e: Fourth Priority Breakdown of Responses
In conclusion, 19 respondents believe that “Accommodating Staff” is the least important
criterion out of the five requirements stated (refer to table 3f). Due to the limited customer
interaction initiated by the pandemic, many of them might think of this as a delighter rather than
a necessity. Despite this, Twenty Four Bakeshop should consider training their employees to
always be courteous to their customers as this establishes positive public relations, increasing
their competitive advantage especially against organizations that are well-established in the field.
Table 5: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) of Payment Confirmation Process of Twenty Four Bakeshop
Based on the diagram, the process that can be subject to failure is payment confirmation,
wherein the organization would not proceed in preparing the order unless it has been fully paid
by the customer. This control mechanism was initiated for online transactions, wherein it aims to
protect the organization from fraud. Some of the failures experienced in this activity include 1)
Down System of Payment Option, 2) Late Send of Proof of Payment by Customer and 3)
Delayed Response by Associate. Due to system improvement, some of the online payment
options are not functioning on their scheduled maintenance, which hinders the customer from
paying her order. Furthermore, a manual system of payment verification is currently being
implemented, wherein the customer would select a payment method, manually scan the QR code
from the website and send the proof of payment to the company email address. With this
laboring process, delay can be initiated by the customer or the organization, wherein payment
can be sent or acknowledged late. As payment confirmation has not yet been made, the
production process also incurs a delay, in which frustrates the customer to lose their patience if
expected waiting time is exceeded. The rate of severity garnered a score of 6 points, in which the
effects of this failure has provided serious consequences in the reputation of Twenty Four
Bakeshop. One of the potential causes listed is the direction of follow up messages in the
“Spam” folder, wherein the associate is not able to see the customer responses immediately, thus
incurring additional delay in the process. Occurrence received a score of 7 points, in which a
high number of failures has been experienced by the organization. The organization stated that in
the month of August, around 19 cases involving the same process failure were observed, wherein
they noticed that the potential cause was the primary concern towards late acknowledgement.
The detectability criterion received 4 points, wherein the rate of problem detection is moderately
high. By multiplying all the scores, the Risk Priority Number (RPN) received from this analysis
amounted to 168 points.
The COVID-19 pandemic has become a vital factor in the decrease of sales, Twenty Four
Bakeshop should continue to improve each process present to simplify the customer perspective
of doing business. With the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) conducted, the
researchers can provide recommended actions that can help remedy the exact dilemma being
experienced by Twenty Four Bakeshop. Organizational figures can also attest to this deficiency,
wherein despite the actual time (2.34 minutes) being lower than the acceptable time (2.5
minutes), 38% of online orders received in the month of August exceeded the acceptable time of
payment confirmation. Kindly refer to figure 7 for a Statistical Process Control Chart that
showcases the actual movement of the data sample gathered regarding the time needed for
payment confirmation.
Accessibility Tangibles
Figure 9: Tree Diagram of Alternative Courses of Action for Twenty Four Bakeshop
1. Partnership with Payment Gateway Providers for E-Commerce Plug-Ins in
Organizational Website
Twenty Four Bakeshop is currently experiencing inconsistent minutes in the
acknowledgement of payment confirmation, wherein delay in this process can lead to a domino
effect in the different business activities stated in the flowchart. In order to efficiently accept and
account for payments, the organization should consider partnering with payment gateway
providers and integrate their services in the organizational website. According to Fernando
(2021), this type of technology is utilized by merchants in accepting various modes of payment,
in which portals will appear at the payment section page for customers to choose from. This
integration is truly a key constituent in processing of electronic payment, wherein the technology
will just need to require customers to input their details and automatically confirms to them once
it has been transferred to the organization. On the backend, orders utilizing this type of
advancement will also automatically showcase the order as “Paid”, in which the current process
would require the associate to manually mark the order based on its status.
Towards analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative, the researchers
highly suggest Twenty Four Bakeshop to consider the services of Paymongo in easing the
payment confirmation process it has in its organizational website. To begin, Paymongo is a
Filipino-owned fintech startup that began operations in June 2019, wherein the organization has
already processed $20 million worth of payments since its debut (Shu, 2020). They also offer
different types of payment methods depending on the circumstance of the organization, in which
they offer credit card and digital wallet platforms, allowing these options to be integrated in the
payment Artificial Programming Interface (API) of the website or send manual payment links to
customers towards proceeding with their transactions. The payment gateway provider does not
charge installation and monthly fees, however, they charge depending on the amount of
transactions processed using their technology, in which a 1.5% - 3.5% charge is accounted for as
Paymongo Fee (“Our Pricing”, n.d.). As 40 respondents (72%) of the sample stated that they are
willing to spend PHP 400 and less, this structure can make costs outweigh the benefits as these
minimal fees can accumulate easily (Charlton, 2020). Kindly refer to appendix B to view the
spending patterns of Twenty Four Bakeshop clients. Though an account manager is responsible
for managing the affairs between Twenty Four Bakeshop and Paymongo, challenges that may
arise cannot be responded immediately due to the large volume of accounts held by a single
position.
Twenty Four Bakeshop should strongly contemplate the partnership with payment
gateway providers such as Paymongo since it 1) simplifies the payment process and 2) eases the
implementation of confirmation in both frontend and backend operations. Once the customer
chooses the payment option of their choice, they will be redirected to an online platform wherein
they can simply input their payment details and confirm whether the transaction is accurate. If
the payment was approved, the customer will be informed through SMS that payment was
transferred to Twenty Four Bakeshop. After this, the associate will be the one to relay the order
to the respective location, in which they will be informed using the Viber platform before
operating hours. If the organization decides to utilize the advancement, they will be guided on
how to install the plug-in application in their e-commerce platform. This would be achieved by
conducting merchant training, wherein the organization can ask questions and clarify processes
with Paymongo so that they can efficiently maximize the benefits brought upon by the payment
gateway provider. Through this development, the process of payment confirmation would
increase its consistency since a developed and tested system will be the one to collect and inform
them once payment has been made, especially in their organizational website.
2. Integration of Cloud Based Servers in the Transition of Orders from Online
Platform to Baking Studio
As the organization is currently experiencing delays in the different business activities
after the payment confirmation process, the researchers strive to simplify the communication
process by integrating a cloud based server in both of its branches. For this course of action to
materialize, the associate would be responsible for listing all orders in a spreadsheet that came
from online platforms, which include Facebook, Instagram and Website. This will be done on a
daily basis, wherein the sheet will inform the staff of Twenty Four Bakeshop about the customer
details, specific orders and a total number of items needed to produce. This can be done by
initially sharing a document that is accessible between members of the organization, in which the
associate will be responsible for fixing the details needed by both baking studios. Once Twenty
Four Bakeshop has identified that their frontline staff are capable of operating the system on their
own, access to e-commerce dashboards will be given to them so that they can easily retrieve the
orders and proceed with production. Future plans also include the development of an
independent system that can ease the transition of information, lessening the presence of a
middleman in segregating data.
Mister (2019) has highlighted the prevalence of cloud storage in the 21st century, in
which it empowers the access of relevant information in a remote manner. Despite this,
advantages and disadvantages can still result with the implementation of this alternative. To
begin, Twenty Four Bakeshop can utilize most of its existing resources for the initial setup,
wherein they can download the Google Drive and Google Sheets applications in their iPad that
also acts as their point-of-sale (POS) system. This can save them a staggering amount of cost as
the purchase of hardware equipment is unnecessary. Furthermore, utilizing cloud storage
strengthens the accessibility of data because it can be easily retrieved with the presence of
internet connection. Providers of cloud storage also place a high premium in data security,
wherein they have added layers of protection to safeguard the information placed in these
databases. However, implementing the alternative would require constant training and expertise
since complexities can arise from the system (Kacik, 2021). If Twenty Four Bakeshop aims to
use an established platform, they are unable to customize it to their needs as the industry includes
large market players that continue to dominate their respective industries.
In the materialization of this alternative, Twenty Four Bakeshop should consider two
trains of thought, which include the 1) technical side and 2) human resources aspect. Embracing
cloud based technology can drive developments that can help the organization to speed up the
operational process, wherein they will be alerted if orders have entered the system and fully paid.
Through this analysis, Twenty Four Bakeshop can proceed in the production process
immediately, giving both branches the liberty to independently check the system without the
need of a middle man. Despite the convenience in retrieving data, the technology also ensures
that data privacy is observed at all times, protecting consumers from any external threat. On the
other hand, staff of Twenty Four Bakeshop will also learn a new skill that is quite technical,
wherein to guide them to increase their awareness about this development, workshops, seminars
and simulation activities will be conducted to give them a glimpse into the operational side. The
learning curve would need to be implemented on a gradual basis, so that staff from both branches
can adapt to the new system, passing down the business functions as the organization believes
that they are capable of doing these additional responsibilities.
3. Collaboration with Third-Party Online Delivery Platforms as Partner Merchant
Currently, Twenty Four Bakeshop is striving to maximize its online presence, wherein
they believe that being present in more platforms can widen their reach to more customers. In
order to make this a reality, the organization should consider collaborating with third-party
delivery platforms like Food Panda, Grab Food and Pick A Roo as they have created an online
marketplace that caters to different essentials. As they have built a sustainable process of
receiving orders and product transportation, Twenty Four Bakeshop can integrate themselves in
their current system to increase their distribution channels. Since the organization implements a
cut off time of 12:00 noon for same day deliveries, they can highly encourage customers to order
via these applications so that they can commit to same day delivery. Towards the payment
process, these delivery platforms offer a wide variety of payment options, which include Cash on
Delivery (through Purchase Service), Gcash, Paymaya, Credit and Debit Cards. Logistical
challenges are also minimized since these platforms have a wide connection of delivery riders
that are available throughout the geographical scope of Metro Manila. In terms of transferring
payment from the third-party delivery platform to Twenty Four Bakeshop, they can require the
organization to link their bank account in the application process so that payments will be wired
on a monthly basis.
The pandemic has shifted consumer trends, especially with the purchase of food-related
items due to government-mandated regulations that hinder organizations to allow dine-in
customers. Though Twenty Four Bakeshop’s store layout is designed to operate as a kiosk, they
were also affected by this policy as it limited the number of patrons dining out. By implementing
this alternative, numerous advantages and disadvantages can arise, wherein the organization
should consider each idea as it might affect the long term operation of Twenty Four Bakeshop.
To begin, partnering with these online applications will widen the customer reach of the
organization, in which these platforms can introduce Twenty Four Bakeshop to a new set of
demographics (Pura, 2018). With their strong presence in the market, these institutions can also
intensify the marketing strategies of the primary organization by helping them publish collateral
and increasing customer engagement. Their wide network can also provide support in the
operational perspective so that merchants can focus on providing quality products and outputs.
Despite this, maintaining this alternative can be costly as a large percentage of total sales will be
accounted for as payment for using the platform. Organizations also have minimal control over
the output received by the customers, as system and logistical challenges may arise that are not
within their jurisdiction of expertise. As many people are utilizing these platforms due to their
dominance, customers are overwhelmed with the various number of choices, creating a saturated
market.
This alternative can help Twenty Four Bakeshop in dominating the Philippine cookie
shop market, wherein various channels are bound to be born if a collaboration was made. The
organization is highly considering this alternative as it can serve as an additional arm for
marketing purposes and create system improvements, especially in the acquisition of same day
orders. The cutoff time listed in the website serves as a limitation for the organization to have a
smooth operational flow, wherein promoting this alternative can ease the payment process, and at
the same time, let Twenty Four Bakeshop focus on maintaining quality in their outputs. As the
system used by these online platforms can include technical processes, merchant training will be
required before opening the platform, in which a device will be needed to track the different
orders present in the app. Though these platforms have separate devices, all of them have a
similar process that is easy to follow.
V. Cost of Quality
The cost of quality is a way for assessing the costs that businesses pay in ensuring that
their products meet quality standards, as well as the costs of manufacturing goods that fail to
meet these quality standards. The purpose of cost of quality is to have a better knowledge of how
quality affects the bottom line. Both factors matter, whether it's the cost of waste and rework
associated with poor quality or the cost of audits and maintenance connected with good quality
(Tulip, n.d.). Businesses can use the cost of quality to analyze and improve their quality
operations. Kindly view table 8 to see the Cost of Quality computation done by the researchers in
assessing the alternatives suggested.
Total Additional
Sales - PHP
29,319.43
2nd Alternative Cloud Server - PHP Average Online Sales PHP 1,727.77
3,000 - PHP 117,277.70
1 Day Training
Seminar - PHP 500
Speed of 25% 3 1 2
Implementation
Return on 25% 3 2 1
Investment
(ROI)
Sustainability in 30% 3 1 2
the Long Run
Total 100% 12 5 7
Table 9: Decision Matrix
The first initiative received the highest score out of all the alternatives suggested, wherein
a total score of 12 points was garnered by the idea of creating a partnership with payment
gateway service providers. It got a score of 3 points in the feasibility criterion as the system can
automatically redirect customers to their intended choice of payment, simplifying the process of
payment and its confirmation. Moreover, implementing the alternative will take a short amount
of time as orientation and integration activities given by the payment gateway providers are the
primary steps needed before launching the simplified process. Furthermore, the third criterion
considers the financial aspect of the alternative, wherein payment gateway service providers
charge a minimal percentage of total sales utilized by their platform. In the case of Paymongo,
the rates range between 1.5% - 3.5%, in which it is a fair amount to spend accounting for the
convenience brought about by their service. As it simplifies the process of confirmation in both
the perspectives of Twenty Four Bakeshop and its customers alike, the researchers can say that
the organization can continue using these services, making customers at ease, thus they are
willing to spend more.
The second alternative garnered the lowest score, receiving a total score of 5 points out of
the 4 criterions presented. To simplify the process of payment confirmation, this course of action
suggests the integration of cloud based servers so that staff from both branches can see in real
time the orders coming and begin its preparation. Though it is a promising initiative, it received
the lowest score in feasibility as it does not solve the payment confirmation process, wherein
despite the order entering the system, the associate would still need to confirm the payment
manually before beginning production. Analyzing its complexity can also stall the
materialization of the initiative, in which from the 3 alternatives presented, this course of action
would take the longest time to fully be implemented. It would also entail many resources,
wherein both hardware and software requirements are needed to build the intended output.
Training and development seminars will also need to take place in order for staff to familiarize
themselves with the new system being built. However, the researchers progress that the
investment spent will be returned before 1 year. The alternative will not be sustainable in solving
the dilemma of delayed payment confirmations as this added responsibility for staff can hinder
them towards efficient operations, intensifying the rate of delay experienced.
The third initiative accumulated 7 points, wherein it mostly received average scores on 4
criterions laid down by the researchers. In beginning this course of action, its feasibility received
an average answer as third party delivery applications have already developed a well designed
system in order taking, in which Twenty Four Bakeshop would just need to focus on preparing
the orders and meeting with the partner riders. It can also be done in a reasonable amount of
time, in which the partner applications would be responsible for providing the different resources
needed to commence operations. Briefing of operational processes would be a requisite before
launching so that the organization can familiarize itself about the process before being
fully-operational. Though this alternative is fully equipped with abundant resources, depending
on its power to become a primary source of sales generation would not be feasible as these
applications get a large percentage cut from orders passing through the application, ranging from
5% - 25% depending on customer familiarity. Renting of equipment such as ordering devices
would also add to the staggering costs, in which both fixed and variable costs can hurt the
finances of Twenty Four Bakeshop. Despite this, the reach of these platforms can increase
customer engagement of the organization, wherein a new sales channel is born to cater a wider
demographic of consumers across Metro Manila.
B. Process Decision Program Chart
A Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC) is a management tool that can be of aid in
identifying what might go wrong in a plan under development (Hessing, n.d.). The researchers
utilized the chart presented below in order to create an efficient and effective plan. It is
composed of the chosen alternative in the first level, the main activities in the second level, the
tasks required in the third level, potential problems in the fourth level, and finally, possible
countermeasures in the last level. The countermeasures provided to the issues were marked “o”
and “x” for practical and impractical ones, respectively. Kindly refer to figure 10 to view the
Process Decision Program Chart (PDPC) conducted by the researchers.
Figure 10: Process Decision Program Chart for Twenty Four Bakeshop
There are two main activities that are essential in order to Partner up with Payment
Gateway Providers for E-Commerce Plug-Ins in Organizational Website, namely: 1) Reaching
out to PayMongo and 2) Training and Development of Staff. In reaching out to PayMongo,
evaluating PayMongo’s current rates, drafting a contract, and being in consistent communication
with that company are needed. However, potential issues may arise during the process. One of
the problems that may occur in evaluating PayMongo’s current rates is that its prices may be too
expensive for Twenty Four Bakeshop. Nevertheless, these rates can be negotiated with
PayMongo to make it beneficial for both parties. The content of the contract may also be subject
to misinterpretation if certain words or terms are not defined clearly. Thus, setting continuous
meetings with PayMongo is a must until the contract is finalized for easy clarification. In
drafting the contract, the inclusion of the wrong terms and conditions may also be a possible
result. With this, the researchers believe that both parties should review the contract thoroughly
and rewrite it in case there are errors or unclear terms. Due to the utilization of the online
meetings, there might also be instances wherein one of the parties may have no or unstable
internet connection. The researchers disagree with the idea that Twenty Four Bakeshop sets a
meeting in-person with PayMongo as a solution considering that it is a waste of resources and is
not safe, most especially that there is still a pandemic.
On the other hand, under Training and Development of Staff, activities such as setting
seminars, restructuring processes, and integrating PayMongo in the system are necessary. In
these three activities, there may be potential issues that may arise. Firstly, for setting up
seminars, one problem that may arise is a misunderstanding due to the fact that this kind of
training is not on a personal level. A solution to this problem is to have personal consultations if
there are any concerns regarding the matter to help the staff cope with the new processes.
Another activity to be done is to restructure the processes followed by the staff. However, in this
option, two dilemmas that may occur would be that some of the employees may be resistant to
role changes and staff may be prone to human error considering that these processes are new to
them. Nevertheless, implementing financial penalties and replacing these staff are not practical
solutions to this problem knowing that this may bring more issues rather than advantages.
Explaining the benefits and consequences thoroughly may be a more viable approach. Lastly, the
third activity is to integrate PayMongo in the system. This activity may have the problem of
software malfunction, most especially because the staff are new to this technology and do not
completely know how to troubleshoot. Frequent maintenance checks should be a must for
Twenty Four Bakeshop to prevent this from happening. Through the Progress Decision Program
Chart, the researchers were able to come up with concrete solutions in advance in case some of
these mentioned issues may arise.
C. Improved Flowchart
The researchers would like to integrate some of the feasible initiatives as it can widen the
scope and service of Twenty Four Bakeshop. These developments can also speed the process of
payment confirmation, making it accessible for customers to easily pay for their orders. Kindly
refer to figure 11 to view the improved flowchart of Twenty Four Bakeshop.
Figure 11: Improved Flowchart of Twenty Four Bakeshop
To begin, customers start their journey by visiting the various distribution channels
offered by Twenty Four Bakeshop, wherein they can visit their baking studios in Bonifacio
Global City (BGC) and Estancia at Capital Commons or their online platforms, which interaction
can happen between Facebook, Instagram and their website. As an additional feature in
strengthening their digital presence, Twenty Four Bakeshop has partnered with different 3rd
party applications like FoodPanda, Pick A Roo, Booky and Joy Ride (JR Mall) to help them
widen their reach to a new demographic of clients. After they visit, the customer orders, wherein
the organization will ask for their payment. Once the total amount has been viewed, customers
will be presented about the various payment channels they can choose from, in which this section
is segregated as 1) For Twenty Four Bakeshop and 2) For 3rd Party Apps. The first category
focuses on all orders received by the organization through their independent channels, which
come from walk-ins, social media pages and their website. For payment options, Twenty Four
Bakeshop offers Cash (walk-in only), BDO Bank Transfer, BDO Pay Checkout, Gcash,
Paymaya, Credit Card, Tendo Pay and Paypal. To elaborate on some options, BDO Pay Checkout
is a system that allows the organization to issue payment links to their customers using
Philippine-based credit cards, wherein payment status can be checked via dashboard powered by
iPay88. While the payment options of Cash (walk-in only), BDO Bank Transfer and BDO Pay
Checkout are still done manually, all other choices will experience an external redirection to the
payment service provider, in which customers can input their details. On the contrary, the second
category focuses on the payment options of 3rd party applications, wherein majority of them
accept Cash on Delivery, Credit Card, Gcash and Paymaya as payment methods for orders
entering these platforms. For orders coming from Twenty Four Bakeshop, payment confirmation
will be provided systemically once it has been played on the e-commerce platform. On the other
hand, orders coming from 3rd party applications will enter the dashboard developed by the
issuing organization, in which both branches have direct access to these platforms to monitor
same day orders. If these branches have already received the orders, they can commence the
production process in making the different products offered by Twenty Four Bakeshop. Once this
phase is done, customers have the option to have their order delivered or picked up in their
branches, wherein if they choose to have it delivered, the organization would need to book a
rider, which will be responsible for transporting the order to the customer. If the customer
decides to pick up the order, they can visit and contact their preferred branch to receive their
orders.
VII. Quality Improvement Time Table
An action plan is necessary towards implementing an alternative course of action in a
proper manner. With the chosen alternative, the researchers strive to speed up the process of
payment confirmation of Twenty Four Bakeshop as it constitutes to the delay of different
business processes that will jeopardize the face of the institution. The action plan listed will
indicate a time table to complete the alternative, the expected output from the job and cost to
materialize the initiatives. Kindly refer to table 10 to view the time table Twenty Four Bakeshop
will be using to materialize its initiatives
Transfer of Payments Every end of the Receive Funds from 3.5% of Total Online
from Payment Month Online Payment Payment Transactions
Gateway Provider to Transactions (from Plug-In and
Twenty Four Payment Links)
Bakeshop
Table 2: Action Plan Time Table
Since the operations of payment collection and confirmation have been a primary
challenge that hinders efficient operations of Twenty Four Bakeshop, the researchers should
consider the prompt and orderly response of this course of action to minimize the presence of
delay. The action plan is divided into 2 main categories, which include 1) Initiative Deliberation
and 2) Initiative Execution. The first category focuses on searching for different methods to solve
the problem, wherein a concept should be analyzed to come up with a concrete solution. The
researchers have allocated 3 days in the creation of this alternative, in which a concept plan to
solve the high repetitions of payment confirmation delay has occurred in Twenty Four Bakeshop.
As an additional measure, the organization can also start looking for potential partners, wherein a
time table of 1 week is given for them to assess the different offerings and rate each provider
depending on their preference and needs. Once both activities are done, the business owner will
spearhead a deliberation process to assess the feasibility and future of partnering with a payment
gateway service provider, in which management would evaluate and construct feedback for
future reference. If an approval was to be made, Twenty Four Bakeshop can initiate contacting
potential payment gateway service providers that can help them strengthen their reach. An
example of these partners include Paymongo, a fintech start up organization that is renowned for
its high security, convenient processes and wide varieties of payment options available. Twenty
Four Bakeshop should strive to initiate the conversation with payment gateway providers as they
are in need of their services in speeding up the payment and confirmation process. In order to do
this, the researchers have allocated 2 days in the submission of intention, wherein they can email
a customer representative to state their position and need of using their services. The
organization will be waiting until 5 days for a response, in which they strive to follow up the
request if it has not yet been entertained. If the payment gateway services provider does respond
and agree with the collaboration, Twenty Four Bakeshop can proceed with the onboarding
application process, wherein they strive to allot 2 days to complete the application forms given
by the payment service provider. Processing of documents will take approximately 7 working
days, in which Twenty Four Bakeshop is encouraged to finish the application process in a short
period of time. After processing, the payment gateway service provider will initiate a meeting
with a representative from Twenty Four Bakeshop to conduct merchant training, wherein they
will be explaining the services they provide and an overview on how to install these
developments. Supplementary materials will also be provided, giving a step by step guide on
how to use their services. Twenty Four Bakeshop will also utilize 1 day to conduct further
training, in which the first half of the day will be allocated to install the plug-in while the second
half will be for creating payment links. Both parts will be essential towards the payment
confirmation process, as the organization will familiarize themselves with the process by
simulating scenarios in order taking. As they maximize the use of social media platforms and
their website, Twenty Four Bakeshop is determined to utilize both modes of payment collection
as it speeds the confirmation process and strengthens security of funds. At the end of each
month, the payment service provider will transfer the funds gathered in a month to the bank
account registered by Twenty Four Bakeshop in the application process, wherein the organization
estimates that 3.5% of total online transactions will be deducted as fee for using the gateway
services. Kindly refer to figure 12 to view the Gantt chart conducted by the researchers.
Payment Confirmation
Observation Acceptable Time (min) Actual Time (min) Turnover Rate (min)
1 2.5 2 1.25
2 2.5 5 0.50
3 2.5 4 0.63
6 2.5 1 2.50
8 2.5 3 0.83
9 2.5 4 0.63
12 2.5 3 0.83
13 2.5 2 1.25
15 2.5 2 1.25
18 2.5 2 1.25
20 2.5 3 0.83
21 2.5 2 1.25
22 2.5 0.75 3.33
23 2.5 1 2.50
26 2.5 2 1.25
29 2.5 4 0.63
30 2.5 1 2.50
31 2.5 5 0.50
33 2.5 1 2.50
37 2.5 2 1.25
42 2.5 4 0.63
44 2.5 2 1.25
45 2.5 2.25 1.11
48 2.5 3 0.83
50 2.5 2 1.25
Appendix A1: Payment Confirmation Turnover Time Table
Statistic Value
Statistic Value
Rbar/d2 1.266464
Number of samples 50
Subgroup size 1
Number of subgroups 50