Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rights of Persons Under Custodial Investigation in The Philippines
Rights of Persons Under Custodial Investigation in The Philippines
(1) The rights of an accused person under in-custody investigation are expressly enumerated
(a)Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be
informed of his rights to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel
preferably of his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be
provided with one. These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of
counsel;
(b)No torture, force, violence, intimidation or any other means which vitiate the free will
shall be used against him. Secret detention places, solitary, incommunicado, or other similar
forms of detention are prohibited;
(d)The law shall provide for penal and civil sanctions for violation of this section as well as
compensation to aid rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practice, and their families.
(2) Under RA 7834, the following are the rights of persons arrested, detained or under
custodial investigation:
(a)Any person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation shall at all times be assisted
by counsel;
(b)Any public officer or employee, or anyone acting under his order or in his place, who
arrests, detains or investigates any person for the commission of an offense shall inform the
latter, in a language known to and understood by him, of his right to remain silent and to have
competent and independent counsel, preferably of his own choice, who shall at all times be
allowed to confer privately with the person arrested, detained or under custodial
investigation. If such person cannot afford the services of his own counsel, he must be
provided that before such report is signed, or thumbmarked if the person arrested or detained
does not know how to read and write, it shall be read and adequately explained to him by his
counsel or by the assisting counsel provided by the investigating officer in the language or
dialect known to such arrested or detained person, otherwise, such investigation report shall
investigation shall be in writing and signed by such person in the presence of his counsel or
in the latter‘s absence, upon a valid waiver, and in the presence of any of the parents, older
brothers and sisters, his spouse, the municipal mayor, the municipal judge, district school
supervisor, or priest or minister of the gospel as chosen by him; otherwise, such extrajudicial
confession shall be inadmissible as evidence in any proceeding;
(e)Any waiver by person arrested or detained under the provisions of Art. 125 of the Revised
Penal Code or under custodial investigation, shall be in writing signed by such person in the
presence of his counsel; otherwise such waiver shall be null and void and of no effect;
(f)Any person arrested or detained or under custodial investigation shall be allowed visits by
his or conferences with any member of his immediate family, or any medical doctor or priest
or religious minister chosen by him or by his counsel, or by any national NGO duly
accredited by the Office of the President. The person‘s ―immediate family‖ shall include his
or her spouse, fiancé or fiancée, parent or child, brother or sister, grandparent or grandchild,
(a)The right to remain silent — Under the right against self-incrimination in Sec. 17, only an
accused has the absolute right to remain silent. A person who is not an accused may assume
the stance of silence only when asked an incriminatory question. Under Sec. 12, however, a
person under investigation has the right to refuse to answer any question. His silence,
moreover, may not be used against him (People vs. Alegre and Gordoncillo, 94 SCRA 109);
(b)The right to counsel — Example of those who are not impartial counsel are (1) Special
counsel, private or public prosecutor, counsel of the police, or a municipal attorney whose
interest is adverse to that of the accused; (2) a mayor, unless the accused approaches him as
counselor or adviser; (3) a barangay captain; (4) any other whose interest may be adverse to
that of the accused (People vs. Tomaquin, GR 133188, July 23, 2004);
(c)The right to be informed o his rights — the right guaranteed here is more than what is
shown in television shows where the police routinely reads out the rights from a note card; he
must also explain their effects in practical terms (People vs. Rojas, 147 SCRA 169). Short of
this, there is a denial of the right, as it cannot then truly be said that the person has been
after a person has been taken into custody otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any
significant way. The right to custodial investigation begins only when the investigation is no
longer a general inquiry into an unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular
suspect, the suspect has been taken into police custody, the police carry out a process of
interrogations that lends itself to eliciting incriminating statements (Escobedo vs. Illinois, 378
US 478; People vs. Marra, 236 SCRA 565). It should be noted however, however, that
although the scope of the constitutional right is limited to the situation in Escobedo and
Marra, RA 7438 has extended the guarantee to situations in which an individual has not been
formally arrested but has merely been ―invited‖ for questioning (People vs. Dumantay, GR
130612, May 11, 1999; People vs. Principe, GR 135862, May 2, 2002).