Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 7: Labour
Unit 7: Labour
I
LABOUR
•. _. . .
. Structure
7.0 Objectives
7.1 Introduction
7.43 Unemployment
7.11 KeyWords
7.0 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to:
and
• list the various laws, schemes and programmes designed to protect the interest
of agricultural labours.
7.1 INTRODUCTION
TIle Indian economy is predominantly agrarian in nature. Agriculture continues to be
the most dominant employer. One should remember that the poorest of poor in
India are overwhelmingly concentrated in rural areas, engaged in agriculture and
non-agricultural occupations. They are mainly labour households, comprising wage
labourers as well as self-employed. petty cultivators ..The landless labour, the village
artisans and the small and marginal farmersare the most vulnerable among the rural
population. Among these, the landless labour, i.e., the agricultural labour is at the
bottom ofthe ladder.
• Cultivators, i.e., those who work on their own, leased or mortgaged land for
themselves.
• Agricultural labour, i.e., those who work on another person's land for wages
for money, kind or share.
Labour in agriculture, alternatively, on the basis of the number of days worked during
a year are also classified as (i) main workers, and (ii) marginal workers.
Main workers are classified as those workers who work for more than 183 days
m a year.
Marginal workers are classified as those workers who work for less than 183
days in a year.
Workers in the rural sector estimated at 310.66 million in census 2001, constitute
more than 77 per cent of the total work-force in the economy, as would be clear
from Table 7.1.
55
Resources in Agriculture Table 7.1: Main and Marginal WorkersInvolved in Agriculture Activities in
Rural India
.. ..
Total' .,·Mafu Marginal Main Marginal
-
'Wo'rkers Workers Workers Workers to .Workers to
•Persons Persons Persons . Total Total
(M+F) {M+F} .. (IV1+F) Workers . Workers
(Per cent) (Percent)
M = Males, F = Females
2) Main workers constituted 91.02 per cent of the total 'work force in the 1991
census. In the 2001 census, the proportion came down 77.80percel1t; i.e., to
the number ofmargirialworkershas increased at amuch faster ratethan the
groWthiateof~he,*ork'"force. ' ,
.: ''>. .
Likewise, in the rural sector the proportion of marginal workers in the total work
force increasedfrom about 10.74 percent in the 1991 census to 26.07per cent in
the 2001 census. In absoluteterms.the numberof marginal workers in the rural
sector increased from 26.74 million in the 1991 census to 80.98 million in the 2001
census.
Among the marginal workers, there were more women than men. In 2001, there
were 51.12 million female marginal workers and only about 30 million male marginal
56
workers in rural India. The composition of main to marginal workers among femali Labour
workers changed from 70:30 in 1991 to 54:46 in 2001. The composition of the
male workers is still heavily tilted towards main workers= from 98:2 in 1991 to
85:15 in 2001.
A decade ago, almost allmarginal workers were women. In the past decade,
male worker is also being marginalized. The share of female workers among the
marginal workers has come down from 91.38 per cent to 63.12 per 'Centover the
past decade. The share of men among marginal workers increased from 2 per
cent in 1991 to 15 per: cent in 2001. The rural distress in thepast decade has
forced more men to accept marginal work so much so that male workers
categorized as marginal workers more than doubled.
Primarityrwork opportunities did not keep pace with the demand for work in the
economy as a whole and particularly in the rural sector. Being poor, people
accept evert marginal work rather than remaining unemployed, Hence the share of
marginal workforce has increased. '
, '
Particulars Cultiva- Percen- Agricul- ' Percentage House- Percent Other Percent Total
tors tageof tural of hold ofHH Workers of Other Workers
Cultiva- Labour Agricul- (HH) Industry Workers (Main+
tors to tural Industry Workers to Total Marginal)
Total Labourers to Total Workers
r'.
Male 84.05 (42.19) 54.75 (27.48) 5.64 (2.83) 54.76 (27.49) (199.20)
Female 40.64 (36.45) 48.37 (43.40) 6.07 (5.44) 16.38 (14.69) (111.46) .
'.'
Persons 124.68 (40.13) 103.12 (33.19) 11.71 (3.76) 71.14 (22.90) (310.66)
(M+F)
1) About 73.32 per cent of the total rural work-force finds its subsistence in
agriculture (Cultivators+Agricultural Labour), Household industry contributes
only about 3.76 per cent of the total employment, whereas the other activities
account for about 22.90 per cent:
2) The workers engaged in the agricultural activity are classified into two:
(i) cultivators and (ii) agricultural labourers. Cultivators are defined as those
workers who work on their own, leased or mortgaged land for themselves.
Agricultural labourers work for others for wages in money, kind or share.
3)· Cultivators constitute 40.13 per cent ofthe total work-force in the rural sector,
whereas agricultural labourers constitute another sizeable share of3 3.19 per
cent. In absolute terms, cultivators number 124.68 million in the 2001 census,
whereas agricultural labours were counted as 103.12 million.
• dairy farming;
The number of agricultural labourers in the Indian economy has been continuously
rising. It has exhibited a fairly long-term trend. The Famine Commission, 1880,
struck one of the earliest warning notes about the growth of surplus population on
land. It was the cumulative effect of a large number of factors like land tenure,
monetisation and commercialization of agriculture and decline of handicrafts, etc.
During the post-independence period the ranks of agriculture labour continued to
swell, as will be clear from Table 7.3.
1901 16.90
. 1921 17.40
1951 19.07
1971 26.33
1981 26.15
1991 26.20
2001 26.69
The proportion of agricultural labour to the total number of workers is not uniform
throughout the country. Against the all-India average of 26.69 percent, the proportion
of agricultural labour to total workers was as small as 0.11 in Chandigarh, 3.52 per
cent in Himachal Pradesh, and 0.30 per cent in Delhi, etc., and as high as 48.18 per
cent in.Bihar, 39.63 per cent in Andhra Pradesh, 25.66 per cent in Kerala, 31.16
per cent inTamil Nadu, etc. In all those states where agriculfure forms a significant
part of econoinic activity, agricultural labours are found in large numbers.
Another way to look at the problem is to examine the trend in the proportion of
agricultural labour households to total rural households. The First Agricultural Labour
Enquiry (ALE) reported this proportion as 30.4 in early 1950s; the Second
Agricultural Labour Enquiry put it at 24.5 per cent in 1956..,57. The First Rural
Labour Enquiry (RLE) Committee determined this proportion at 21.8 per cent,
while the Second Rural Labour Enquiry noticed a marked rise to 25.3 per cent in.
1974-75. The data are indicative of the fact that about a quarter of the total rural
households belong to the category of agricultural labour, These trends are indicative
of growing landlessness, casualisation and marginalisation in the Indian rural sector.
4) The employer of agricultural labour himself may not be a person of high means.
This will be a situation when a small.farmer employs another small farmer who'
may not have sufficient work to do by himself. A direct contact, therefore,
between the employer and the worker is a distinct characteristic of agricultural
labour.
5) Agricultural labour is hardly covered by any rules and regulations. Law, if at all
it exists, is flirt more often than it is observed.
operation all the year round and are often employed on oral or written contracts for
three or six months or even a year. Thus, seasonal workers have seasonal contracts
-, with a provision that they may work elsewhere when there is no work either on the
farm or in the home of the employer. Some employers advance wages to them on
the understanding that the latter remain in service for a certain period. Wages in kind
form a very insignificant part of the agricultural wage-system and it true for all
economic groups, the only exception being the attached worker whose wages "are
sometimes paid in kind.
The low yield, sub-divided and fragmented holdings, absence of scientific methods
of cultivation, prevalence of burdensome agricultural debt and possibility of
60
employment of women and children and inadequate off-farm employment Labour
opportunities have been some of the factors that affect the wage levels of agricultural
worker in the country. Wages are also affected by social factorslike customs and
traditions. Again there have been variations in wage levels depending on personal,
regional and seasonal factors. Further wage of attached workers have been lower
than those of seasonal workers which, in turn, have been lower than those of casual
labour.
The majority of agricultural labour in many parts ofIndia have very low level of
earning and are forced to live inconditions of abject poverty. Their income falls
much short of minimum desirable expenditure. This forces them to borrow money
and puts them under heavy debt. Because of increasing pressure of population on
agricultural land, seasonal and uncertain nature of agricultural employment and
existence of voluntary or involuntary unemployment and underemployment, the
workers live under tremendous pressure.
As per the NSS estimates, 52.32 per cent of agricultural labour households were
indebted at national level. The percentage of indebted households were observed to
be higher than the national level inmany states; like Andhra Pradesh, Haryana,
Jarnmu and Kashmir, Kerala, PUnjab, Rajasthan and Tarnil Nadu. The highest
proportion was found in Kerala (80.70 per cent) and lowest'in Assam (11.75 per
cent). The total outstanding debt per household at the all-India level was reported to
be R~. 680. The highest (Rs. 1,808) was in Rajasthan and the lowest (Rs. 244) in
West Bengal.
7.4.3 'Unemployment
4) Agricultural female workers need some specific support against stoppage 'of
income due to maternity and baby care. They also get less wages than male
labourers. They, therefore, need maternity leave and medical support during
maternity as well as creches and childcare centres.
5) Among the agricultural labourers, some other vulnerable groups are old age
people and widows.
62
Labour
7.5 CAUSES OF THE GROWTH OF
AGRICULTURAL LABOUR
In the post-independence India, the primary impetus to the growth in the ranks of
agricultural labourers has come from the land reforms programme. The net effect of
the implementation ofland reform laws on the labouring class has been, as U sha
Patnaik (Social Scientist, July 1983) put it, "To perpetuate the old, semi-feudal
forms of bonded and attached labour on an increasingly more monetized basis while
providing on impetus towards capitalist production for profit." The ranks oflandless
were swollen by evictions and market integration of tribal areas, coupled with the
replacement of tribal system of tenure by individual system, has led to growing'
landlessness, loss of food security and increasing deprivation ofthe access of tribal
to employment and incomes in forests. The new developments are also creating a
sub-stratum of new classes among the tribal aligned with the elite from non-tribal
groups.
Among other causes that account for the rapid multiplication of agricultural labour
and their present degrading situation, the following may be considered.
2) Frequently, the advantage ofthe situation is taken by landlords who exploit the
labour fully. Only if a part of the available supply of agricultural sector could
have been diverted to the non-agricultural activities, the situation would have
acquired a different complexion altogether. It would have had two effects: (i)
labour would have had alternative employment opportunities to look to, and
therefore, could have some locus standi in bargaining with the employer; (ii) it
would have a salutary effect on landlords in as much as they could not have
taken for granted the supply oflabour that matched their requirements.
3) Real wage rate is determined by the mode of payment, i.e., whether the payment
is made in cash or kind, the system of payment of wages in kind is being
increasingly replaced by cash and monetisation of the agrarian economy. The
substantial part of wages during the harvest is paid in kind which keeps the
deteriorating standards in check to some extent.
4) . Unlike the industrial worker, the agricultural labour is not organized. His
employment is more a matter of personal whim ofthe employer. The situation
is frequently exploited by the employer. Wherever the labour has been organized
as in Kerala the results have been generally encouraging.
labourers. In some other countries where similar situations arose, the state
intervened to protect the interest of labourers by adopting both restrictive and
promotional measures. Restrictive measures have generally taken the form of
legislation so framed that it could ensure minimum wages and tolerable living
conditions. Promotional measures have taken the form of imparting training
and skills and exploring alternative employment opportunities for agricultural
63
Resources in Agriculture labourers. In India, though the state has been aware of this widespread and
serious problem, it has not done much beyond enacting legislation to protect
the interests ofthe labourers, except perhaps in Kerala. As we shall see in the
next section, much of this legislation has not been paid any attention and has
been frequently flouted without any deterrent.
Note: a) Use the spaces given below for writing your answers.
b) Check your answer with those given at the end of the unit.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0°•••••• °0
••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• :'0 •••••••••••
The Minimum WagesAct which empowers the government to fix minimum rates of
wages payable by employers is applicable interalia to agricultural workers also.
The Act has been extended almost to the whole of the country and accordingly
minimum wages for agriculturallabourershave been fixed.However, the enforcement
of the provisions of tills Act has not been feasible. The task of enforcing minimum
64
wages in agriculture, as the National Corrunission on Agriculture point out, does not Labour
have any feasibility features like identifiability, enforceability and terminability as are
characteristics of the organized industrial sector. In any case, enactment of minimum
wage legislation or even its enforcement is not likely to solve the problem of agricultural
labour against a background ofless demand from and more supply of such labour
and the absence of unionization of agricultural labourers. The increase in the number
of persons depending on agriculture for wage employment appears to be largely an
involuntary shift into this occupation rather than due to increased employment
opportunities in agriculture. There is, therefore, the problem of providing either the
means of production including land or employment.
The Life Insurance Corporation ofIndia (UC) has introduced a Group Insurance
. Scheme winch covers all agri cuItural labour families. Under+« s::!~':!!11elife insurance
65
Resources in Agriculture is being offered to the bread-earner of the family in the age group of 18 to 60 years.
•
The premium under the scheme is only Rs. 10 per annum for an insurance cover of
Rs. 1,000. The premium is paid by the Central Government.
The National Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation has been
established with a sum ofRs. 25 crore as share capital to assist persons belonging to
backward classes by way ofloans and finances for economically and financially
viable schemes and projects. The corporation also aims at generating self-.
employment, granting concessional finance and help upgradation of technical and
entrepreneurial skills of backward classes. It also assists state level organisations for
development of backward classes.
Under the Act, if anyone has taken any debt and is rendering his services in lieu of
that debt after he has been released, it is the duty of the government to identify,
release and rehabilitate the bonded labourers.
After the passing of this Act, if any custom, tradition, agreement or any contract is
there, the same would be void and no person or his family member can be compelled
to provide his! her or their services as bonded labourer.
There is no doubt that the various labour legislation in India have been successful at
least to some extent in protecting the interests of the working class. However, most
of the Acts become applicable only when employer-employee relationship is
established. Establishing this relationship is very difficult in the agricultural sector
which accounts for a large majority of the labour. Hence the poor agriculturallahours
are often denied the protection provided by these legislations. Apart from this the
existence of a large number oflegislations makes the proper enforcement also difficult.
Framing a comprehensive legislation to bring all the Acts under a single umbrella .
would be a mechanism to remedy this situation and hence assure that the benefits
reach to those who really deserve it.
Keralais perhaps the only state in India which has takensteps to ameliorate the
lot of agricultural labour by introducing the KeralaAgricultural Workers Act, 1974.
This is the only Act which provides security of employment to agricultural
labours. Its not only ensures prompt wages to the workers, but also regulates the
hours of work.
What is more, the Act makes ample provisions for a scheme of Provident Fund on
the pattern of the Employees State Insurance Act. It describes the machinery for the
settlement of agricultural disputes. Direct state intervention has done a lot to improve
the condition of workers like securing standardised working hours and what is more
important social dignity;
Note: a) Use the spaces given below for writing your answer.
b) Check your answer with the given at the end of the unit.
1) Discuss the steps taken by the Government to improve the economic condition
of agricultural labour in India .
................................. ' .
.................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................... /
68
Labour
7.8 SCHEMES AND PROGRAMMES FOR,
BETTERMENT OF AGRICULTURAL
LABOUR
In 1950s, it was believed that economic growth will take care of all the sections of
society and the trickledown theory would work. However this did not happen.
During the 1970s, a number of special programmes for the landless agricultural
labour were undertaken but the major limitation of these programmes was that they
were reduced to mere subsidy giving programmes, lacking any planned approach to
enable the rural poor to achieve a higher level of income. Therefore, the emphasis in
the following years was put not only on evolving programmes which were
comprehensive in nature, but also on making a direct assault on poverty.
ID) Until such time as a wage rate is fixed by the Central govemment, the minimum
wage for agricultural labourers shall be applicable for the scheme.
vi) Panchayat at the district level to constitute a standing committee of its members
to supervise, monitor and oversee the implementation of the scheme within the
district.
vii) For every Block, state governments to appoint a programme officer for
implementing the scheme.
viii) Gram Panchayat to be responsible for identification of the project as per the
recommendations of the Gram Sabha and for executing and supervising sueh
works.
x) The scheme to be self - selecting in the sense that those among the poor who
need work at the minimum wage would report for work under that scheme.
Apart from the above, various other Programmes and schemes are also in operation,
which are meant for the development ofrural areas in general at1dagricultural workers
in particular. These programmes and scheme are implemented by the different
Ministries/Departments through N GOs.
We know that some of the above programmes have been launched only recently.
These new programmes have replaced many other programmes that had been in
operation for about two decades or more. While it is too early to assess the working
of the new programmes, we can certainly benefit from identifying the leakages in the
delivery system of the earlier programmes.
First, the beneficiaries were not involved in the process of designing, formulating,
planning and execution of the programmes. They were kept in dark. They were
Resources in Agriculture treated as a passive recipient. They were kept under the impression that they were
.receiving dole instead of considering it as their right.
Second, the beneficiaries were not made aware about the nature and character of
the programmes. No systematic effort was made to give them adequate information
about the programmes and their execution.
Third, the delivery mechanism was faulty. There was lack of transparency on the
part of the administration. As a result, the beneficiaries being weak, they always had
to bribe the officials to get their due amount, a close nexus developed among three
actors in the implementation process - (i) the Administration; (ii) the Panchayat; and
(iii) the Bank officials.
Measures for stabilisation will not benefit the agricultural workers. Reducing
subsidies for fertilizer and withdrawal of con cc ss iona Icredit will be a disincentive
for agricultural production. Deregulation of industries and entry offoreign capital
and technology may in due course, encourage investment in extractive industries
and cash crop processing. The competition with rural artisans, developed under
protection over the planning period, will be sharp. Consequently, the condition of
agricultural labour will deteriorate.
On the positive side, however, it may be said that reforms of agricultural structure,
involving land reforms and decentralized planning, as is being experimented in West
Bengal, will increase output and demand for labour and improve the condition of
agricultural labour.
During the entire post-reforms period the rural unskilled labour found its living
conditions largely unchanged whereas the bulk of the rest of the community would
have seen a significant improvement.
72
Labour
•• Rural poverty at the all-India level and for almost every state fell consistently
and sharply between the mid 1970s and the late 1980s. But this trend has
certainly been halted, if not reversed, despite the run of good monsoons since
-1988-89. Given that agricultural labourers constitute the overwhelming majority
of the rural poor, there is little doubt that large numbers of them have been
badly hit by the New Economic Policy (NEP).
~ The rural workforce structure had more or less remained unchanged for the
first two-and-a-half decades since independence and subsequently it started
shifting in terms of non-agriculture; it reached the highest level ever in 1989-90.
During the 1990s this trend has suffered a reversal. Contraction in the rural
non- farm activity means shrinkage in whatever employment opportunities had
opened up in this sector for members belonging to agriculture labour households,
thus having a depressive effect on their incomes. - ----
. l! The average annual growth rate in total foodgrains production during 1990-91
and 2004-05 has only been 1.06 per cent, which is well below the population
. growth rate.resulting in falling per capita availability of foodgrains. The
consequences of such developments for vulnerable sections like agricultural
. labourers are obvious enough. A critic perhaps rightly, concludes that this class
oflabour has been' orphaned' .
i)
iI)
...................................................................................................................
• • • • • • • •• • •• • • • •• •• •• •••• •• •• •••• •• •• •• •• •• ""0 •••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ""0 ••••••••••••••••••••••• 0" .•.•.•.•.•.• ~ .•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•.•
................................................................................................................
••••••••••• 0 .•••••••••••••••••• ~ ••••••• 00 ••••••• " •••• 0." •• " •••• " ••••••• 00.0.0.00.0.0·00 ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 0 • o.
73
Resources in Agriculture
7.10 LETUSSUMUP
Agricultural labour is at the lowest ring of the ladder of the Indian society. His work
is seasonal; his wages and income levels are low; he~ives in unsanitary and unhealthy
co.nditions. Being economically poor he is subject 10 different types of exploitation
and repression at the hands of the powerful interest in the rural setup. Very often he
r
ends up as being bonded labour. The welfare stat in India initiated a number of
legislative measures and special schemes and pro~rammes to protect and promote
the interests of the weaker section ofthe society. But the overall positive impact of
these programmes has been limited. In view of the on-going changes in the economy,
it is imperative that steps are taken to find and promote productive employment
opportunities in the non-agricultural sector of the economy.
7.11 KEYWORDS
Casualisation of Labour A tendency wherein increasing number oflabour
are engaged on casual basis rather than on
permanent basis.
Main Workers Those persons who get employed for more than
183 days a year.
2) Benefits of various schemes do not reach to the target group. Several reasons
can be cited for this, Important one non involving of beneficiaries in planning
and execution of programme, non-awareness among beneficiaries and facu1ty
deliverymechanism.
75