The poem explores the differences between crows and roosters and the speaker's uncertainty about which one is better. The speaker considers whether it would be better to be a crow that can crow or a rooster that can also roost. While roosters can be eaten, crows are not. However, the speaker ultimately does not know which is superior as there are advantages and disadvantages to being either a crow or a rooster.
The poem explores the differences between crows and roosters and the speaker's uncertainty about which one is better. The speaker considers whether it would be better to be a crow that can crow or a rooster that can also roost. While roosters can be eaten, crows are not. However, the speaker ultimately does not know which is superior as there are advantages and disadvantages to being either a crow or a rooster.
The poem explores the differences between crows and roosters and the speaker's uncertainty about which one is better. The speaker considers whether it would be better to be a crow that can crow or a rooster that can also roost. While roosters can be eaten, crows are not. However, the speaker ultimately does not know which is superior as there are advantages and disadvantages to being either a crow or a rooster.
The poem explores the differences between crows and roosters and the speaker's uncertainty about which one is better. The speaker considers whether it would be better to be a crow that can crow or a rooster that can also roost. While roosters can be eaten, crows are not. However, the speaker ultimately does not know which is superior as there are advantages and disadvantages to being either a crow or a rooster.