Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.1016@j.matpr.2020.02.166 AA6061 and AA5052
10.1016@j.matpr.2020.02.166 AA6061 and AA5052
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Friction stir welding (FSW) is a solid-state welding method for amalgamation aluminum alloys and has
Received 6 January 2020 been used in aerospace, rail, automotive and marine applications. In FSW, the parent metal properties
Received in revised form 7 February 2020 such as tensile strength, ductility, and hardness are controlled the plastic flow of the metal under the
Accepted 8 February 2020
action of rotating non-consumable tool. The process parameters such as welding speed, Feed, tilt angle,
Available online xxxx
etc. play an important role in deciding the quality of weld in FSW. This work aims to investigate the ten-
sile strength of dissimilar AA6061 and AA5052 aluminum sheets joined by FSW. The two aluminum
Keywords:
sheets are arranged in a line with perpendicular rolling directions of the tool. The Taguchi L9 experimen-
Friction stir welding
Dissimilar aluminium alloys
tal method is chosen to construct the numbers of welding experiments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Taguchi approach analysis is performed to get the optimum range of process parameters and their effects upon the tensile
ANOVA analysis strength of the weld joints. The sheets are successfully welded and the welded sheets are tested under
Tensile strength tension at room temperature to examine the strength. The result shows that the welding speed is
900 rpm, feed is 40 mm/min and tilt angle 2.5 are the influential process parameters to join these dissim-
ilar joints.
Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the First International
conference on Advanced Lightweight Materials and Structures.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.166
2214-7853/Ó 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the First International conference on Advanced Lightweight Materials and Structures.
Please cite this article as: M. Shunmugasundaram, A. Praveen Kumar, N. K. Amudhavalli et al., Parametric optimization on tensile strength of friction stir
butt joints of dissimilar AA6061 and AA5052 aluminium alloys by Taguchi technique, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matpr.2020.02.166
2 M. Shunmugasundaram et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx
Table 2
Result of tensile strength.
S. NO Welding Speed (rpm) Feed (mm/min) Tilt Angle (Degree) Tensile Strength (MPa)
1 900 50 3 151.78
2 900 40 2.5 147.08
3 560 40 3 103.85
4 700 50 3.5 120.86
5 900 30 3.5 100.49
6 700 30 2.5 126.76
7 560 50 2.5 124.56
8 560 30 3 131.29
9 700 40 3.5 128.31
Table 3
Mean of S/N Ratio for tensile strength. angle are 134.69 and 101.33. The delta values for welding speed,
feed and tilt angle are 3.857, 1.623 and 1.66 respectively. The delta
Level Welding Speed (rpm) Feed (mm/min) Tilt angle (mm/min)
values are ranked from high to low and it shows that the welding
1 100.98 113.24 101.33 speed is more influence that the other two parameters. The F-value
2 124.87 116.42 122.06
and P-value for process parameters are shown as ANOVA table in
3 148.78 132.96 134.69
Delta 3.857 1.623 1.66 Table 4. The P-value of welding speed, feed and tilt angle are
Rank 1 2 3 0.085, 0.30 and 0.31 respectively. The Taguchi optimization and
is used to optimize the process parameters to achieve the good
strength of the weld joint at 95% confidence level. It means that
is checked by S/N ratio. The maximum and minimum S/N ratio for a value is 0.05. So, P-value of welding speed is 0.085 and this value
welding speed are 148.78 and 100.98. The maximum and mini- is less that a value. It means that welding speed is more influence
mum S/N ratio for feed are 132.96, 113.24 and this values for tilt than other two parameters.
Table 4
ANOVA table for tensile strength.
3.1.2. Contour plot analysis for tensile strength degree and 50 mm/min, 3 degree, the tensile strength is maximum.
The effect of two different process parameters on responses The contour plot between welding speed and tilt angle is shown in
(tensile strength) is found by the Contour plot. The contour plot Fig. 7. It shows that the tilt angle and welding speed are 3 degree
graph between welding speed and feed are shown in Fig. 5. It and 900 rpm, the tensile strength is maximum.
shows that the welding speed and feed at 900 rpm and
50 mm/min and 600 rpm, 30 mm/min, the tensile strength is max- 4. Conclusions
imum. When the welding speed and feed is increasing, the tensile
strength will increase. The contour plot is drawn between feed and In this research, the two dissimilar aluminum alloys are welded
tilt angle in Fig. 6. The tilt angle and feed are 40 mm/min, 2.5 by FSW. The Taguchi L9 experimental approach is used to find the
nine numbers of welding experiments with different combinations
of the selected three process parameters. Based on the design of
experiments the dissimilar alloys are joined and ASME standard
tensile test specimen is extracted using the wire cut EDM. The spec-
imens are tested under tension using a universal testing machine at
room temperature to examine the strength. Optimum range pro-
cess parameters are found by ANOVA analysis their effects upon
the tensile strength of the weld joints are analyzed by contour plot.
References
[1] J.P. Sara, G.T.R. Gray III, E.K. Cerreta, C.P. Trujillo, A. Perez-Bergquist, The
Fig. 6. Tensile strength vs tilt angle, feed.
dynamic and quasi-static mechanical response of three aluminum armor
alloys: 5059, 5083 and 7039, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528 (29–30) (2011) 8733–
8741, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.046.
[2] S. Katsas, J. Nikolaou, G. Papadimitriou, Microstructural changes accompanying
repair welding in 5xxx aluminium alloys and their effect on the mechanical
properties, Mater. Des. 27 (10) (2006) 968–975, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.matdes.2005.02.012.
[3] J.Q. Su, T.W. Nelson, R. Mishra, M. Mahoney, Microstructural investigation of
friction stir welded 7050–T651 aluminium, Acta Mater. 51 (3) (2003) 713–729,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00449-4.
[4] A. Suri, An improved FSW tool for joining commercial aluminum plates, Pro.
Mater. Sci. 6 (2014) 1857–1864, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.216.
[5] W.M. Thomas, R.E. Dolby, Friction stir welding developments, in: Proceedings
of the Sixth International Trends in Welding Research, ASM International,
Materials Park, OH, USA, 2003, pp. 203–211.
[6] M. Ilangovan, S.R. Boopathy, V. Balasubramanian, Effect of tool pin profile on
microstructure and tensile properties of friction stir welded dissimilar AA 6061
- AA 5086 aluminium alloy joints, Defen. Technol. 11 (2015) 174–184, https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2015.01.004.
[7] M. Shunmugasundaram, V. Anbumalar, Design of cellular manufacturing
system by using new similarity coefficient algorithm to reduce total
traveling time, Asian J. Inf. Technol. 15 (10) (2016) 1539–1546, https://doi.
org/10.3923/ajit.2016.1539.1546.
[8] M. Shunmugasundaram, D. Maneiah, Wastage minimization and
manufacturing cost reduction in raw edge cogged belts by lean
Fig. 7. Tensile strength vs tilt angle, welding speed. manufacturing method, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 9 (2018) 678–686.
Please cite this article as: M. Shunmugasundaram, A. Praveen Kumar, N. K. Amudhavalli et al., Parametric optimization on tensile strength of friction stir
butt joints of dissimilar AA6061 and AA5052 aluminium alloys by Taguchi technique, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matpr.2020.02.166
M. Shunmugasundaram et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings xxx (xxxx) xxx 5
[9] M. Krishnan, S. Subramaniam, Multi-response optimization of process [14] B. Izquierdo, J.A. Sanchez, S. Plaza, I. Pombo, N. Ortega, A numerical model of
parameters by Taguchi grey relational analysis for dissimilar thickness the EDM process considering the effect of multiple discharges, Int. J. Mach.
friction stir process corner weld aa5086alloy, J. Eng. Technol. 13 (10) (2018) Tool Manu. 49 (3–4) (2009) 220–229, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
3297–3312, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406218806032. ijmachtools.2008.11.003.
[10] G. Ugrasen, G. Bharath, G. KishorKumar, R. Sagar, P.R. Shivu, R. Keshavamurthy, [15] D. Pal, A. Bangar, R. Sharma, A. Yadav, Optimization of grinding parameters for
Optimization of process parameters for Al6061-Al7075 alloys in friction stir minimum surface roughness by Taguchi parametric optimization technique,
welding using Taguchi’s technique, Mater. Today Proc. 5 (1) (2018) 3027– Int. J. Mech. Indus. 1 (3) (2012) 74–78. http://interscience.in/IJMIE_
3035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.103. Vol1Iss3/paper14.pdf.
[11] V. Jaiganesh, B.Y. Kumar, P. Sevvel, A.J. Balaji, Optimization of process [16] G. Li, L. Zhou, S. Luo, Y. Huang, N. Guo, H. Zhao, X. Song, Effect of self-reacting
parameters on commercial mild steel using Taguchi technique, Int. J. Eng. friction stir welding on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-Al-Zn
Technol. 7 (1) (2018) 138–142, https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.1.9213. alloy joints, J. Manuf. Process 37 (1) (2019) 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
[12] M. Shunmugasundaram, D. Maneiah, Mangesh Lingampalle, Chetty Nagaraj, jmapro.2018.11.003.
Prajwalkumar Patil, An optimization of process parameters for stir casted [17] H.J. Liu, J.C. Hou, H. Guo, Effect of welding speed on microstructure and
aluminium metal matrix composites to improve material removal rate, Int. J. mechanical properties of self-reacting friction stir welded 6061–T6 aluminum
Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Develop. 9 (2019) 951–960. alloy, Mater. Des. 50 (2013) 872–878.
[13] L. Trueba, M.A. Torres, L.B. Johannes, D. Rybicki, Process optimization in the [18] M. Shunmugasundaram, A. Praveen Kumar, D. Maneiah, An experimental
self-reacting friction stir welding of aluminum 6061–T6, Int. J. Mater. Form. 11 analysis and process parameter optimization on friction stir welded dissimilar
(4) (2018) 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1365-4. alloys, Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. Res. Develop. 9 (2019) 407–414.
Please cite this article as: M. Shunmugasundaram, A. Praveen Kumar, N. K. Amudhavalli et al., Parametric optimization on tensile strength of friction stir
butt joints of dissimilar AA6061 and AA5052 aluminium alloys by Taguchi technique, Materials Today: Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
matpr.2020.02.166