EVALUATION REPORT (As Per Rule 35 of PP Rules, 2004) 1 Name of roceing Ageney Pakistan Engineering Counc 2 Method of Procurement Single stage Two Envelope 2 Tae of rocurement Constraction of PEC Regional Office at Haytabad Peshawar | Tender nau No Na 5 PPRA Re. No (TSO) 1se23379¢ 6 One & Time 8 Cosine 29m May 202038 1:30 hours Technic id: 29m Aay 2020 12.00 hours 7 bate & Tine o Bed Opening Financ id 12h une 20203 1800 hours 1 No of Bids Recenes igh (08) 9 rte for Bd Evan As per entra preseribed in Bidding Documents 10 betas by) Evatation etn are gren below Marks Catuated Con (8) Rule/Regulation/s60/F Technical per Rule 35 See nee 1 rue 6 (0) (9) 7.00 16.21 558.80 stout Advanta Oi hes anh 70,8801 90 PPR 36(0) 200 ang ghost rank anz0s,7e62 Pe ate 3600) 100 * Sed highes ank gunna | FP Rute 3600 ;—e | ___ssniugnestront___ e107 | —} Tecrneaty Nomesponsive bi, Financia Bid returned un opened 200 fiom Responsive (id Secanty ot provided) ‘Recommendation by PEC Bid Evaluation Committe (OEC] and Approved by the Competent Authority ‘On the bass of Report submitted by the Project Consultant and recommendation by PEC Bid Evaluation Committee, the Competent Authority approved to issue leter of intent (Lol to Lowest Evaluated Bidder M/s SARMAD ENGINEERING & ELECTRIC COMPANY with corrected/evaluated bid amount PKR 516,421,554 [Rupees five hundred sixteen million four hundred twenty-one thousand five hundred {ity tour) Successful bidder will execute complete scope of work including missing items through corrected/evaluated bid amount ie PRR $516,421,554/- Considering the price differentia of 26% below the Engineer's Estimate of the works, the requisition of an additional Performance Security of 10% under Clause 18-28. of Instruction to Bidders inthe Bidding Documents (i. a total of 20% ofthe Corrected id Price as Performance Security shal be ensured. Sense \ A Lor sles PROJECT DIRECTOR Pakistan Engineering Counell ee Peshawar Scanned with CamScanner