Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rev AJAEES 91775

    Uploaded by

    hksachin
    15 views2 pages
    This document contains a peer review of the manuscript "Different sources used by the farmers for borrowing crop loan in Jaipur District of Rajasthan". It provides comments and feedback across 5 parts. The reviewer recommends the title be changed, abstract include major findings, and results/discussion be more elaborate. Minor revisions are needed like updating the introduction and fixing errors. The reviewer gives the manuscript an overall rating of 6 out of 10 and recommends major revisions. The last part provides the reviewer's details needed for a reviewer certificate.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Rev_AJAEES_91775

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains a peer review of the manuscript "Different sources used by the farmers for borrowing crop loan in Jaipur District of Rajasthan". It provides comments and feedback across 5 parts. The reviewer recommends the title be changed, abstract include major findings, and results/discussion be more elaborate. Minor revisions are needed like updating the introduction and fixing errors. The reviewer gives the manuscript an overall rating of 6 out of 10 and recommends major revisions. The last part provides the reviewer's details needed for a reviewer certificate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    15 views2 pages

    Rev AJAEES 91775

    Uploaded by

    hksachin
    This document contains a peer review of the manuscript "Different sources used by the farmers for borrowing crop loan in Jaipur District of Rajasthan". It provides comments and feedback across 5 parts. The reviewer recommends the title be changed, abstract include major findings, and results/discussion be more elaborate. Minor revisions are needed like updating the introduction and fixing errors. The reviewer gives the manuscript an overall rating of 6 out of 10 and recommends major revisions. The last part provides the reviewer's details needed for a reviewer certificate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Review Form 1.

    Journal Name: Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology


    Manuscript Number: Ms_AJAEES_91775
    Title of the Manuscript: Different sources used by the farmers for borrowing crop loan in Jaipur District of Rajasthan
    Type of the Article

    General guideline for Peer Review process:

    This journal’s peer review policy states that NO manuscript should be rejected only based on ‘lack of Novelty’, provided the manuscript is scientifically robust and technically sound.
    To know the complete guideline for Peer Review process, reviewers are requested to visit this link:
    (https://www.journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/editorial-policy )

    PART 1: Review Comments


    Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the manuscript and
    highlight that part in the manuscript. It is mandatory that authors should write
    his/her feedback here)
    Compulsory REVISION comments Title should be renamed
    Abstract should include major findings of the study
    The results and discussion should be elaborative and it should give the clear idea of context.
    Minor REVISION comments Introduction should be updated
    The minor typographical and grammatical errors should be attended.
    It can be accepted as the ‘’SHORT NOTE’’
    Optional / General comments

    PART 2:
    Reviewer’s comment Author’s comment (if agreed with reviewer, correct the
    manuscript and highlight that part in the manuscript. It is
    mandatory that authors should write his/her feedback here)

    (If yes, kindly please write down the ethical issues here in details)
    Are there ethical issues in this manuscript?
    Nil

    Nil
    Are there competing interest issues in this manuscript?

    If plagiarism is suspected, please provide related proofs or web links.

    PART 3: Declaration of Competing Interest of the reviewer:

    Here reviewer should declare his/her competing interest. If nothing to declare he/she can write “I declare that I have no competing interest as a reviewer”
    I Have no competing interest as reviewer.

    PART 4: Objective Evaluation:

    Created by: EA Checked by: ME Approved by: CEO Version: 1.6 (10-04-2018)
    Review Form 1.6

    Guideline MARKS of this manuscript


    Give OVERALL MARKS you want to give to this manuscript
    (Highest: 10 Lowest: 0)

    Guideline:
    6
    Accept As It Is: (>9-10)
    Minor Revision: (>8-9)
    Major Revision: (>7-8)
    Serious Major revision: (>5-7)
    Rejected (with repairable deficiencies and may be reconsidered): (>3-5)
    Strongly rejected (with irreparable deficiencies.): (>0-3)

    PART 5: Reviewer Details:


    This information is mandatory to prepare the Reviewer Certificate properly.
    Certificate preparation will not be possible if incomplete information is received.

    Name of the Reviewer Dr. Mutteppa Chigadolli


    Department of Reviewer Agriculture Extension
    University or Institution of Reviewer College of Agriculture, Chamarajanagar, UAS Bangalore
    Country of Reviewer India
    Position: (Professor/lecturer, etc.) of Reviewer Assistant Professor
    Email ID of Reviewer mhchigadolli782@yahoo.com
    WhatsApp Number of Reviewer 8123411162
    5-8 Keywords regarding expertise of Reviewer Knowledge, Attitude, Climate change Adaptations, Decision Making ability, Economic Performance, Adoption, Entrepreneurship Development.

    Created by: EA Checked by: ME Approved by: CEO Version: 1.6 (10-04-2018)

    You might also like