National Board of Accreditation

Part B-Program Assessment Worksheet

Institute Level Criteria to be Assessed by the Chairperson

Name of the Institution .................................................

Name of the Program ....................................................

Criterion 8: First Year Academics (50)

For each year of assessment=(5

× 20)/ FYSFR (Limited to Max. 5)
Average of previous three
academic years including Overall
First Year Student-
8.1. 5 Current Academic Year. Marks for Mention Numbers
Faculty Ratio (FYSFR)
8.1
*Note: If FYSFR is greater than
25, then assessment equal to
zero.
A. Assessment of faculty
Qualification of qualification (5x + 3y)/RF B.
Overall
Faculty Teaching First Average of Assessment of last
8.2. 5 Marks for Mention Numbers
Year Common three years including current
8.2
Courses academic year (Refer 8.2. for x, y
and RF)

Academic Performance =
((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point
Average of all successful
Students on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of
marks in First Year of all Overall
First Year Academic
8.3. 10 successful students/10)) x Marks for Mention Numbers
Performance
(successful students/number of 8.3
students appeared in the
examination)
Successful students are those
who are permitted to proceed to
the Second year

Attainment of Course
8.4. Outcomes of first 10
year courses
8.4.1. Describe the Overall
assessment processes A. List of assessment processes
Marks for
used to gather the (1)
8.4
data upon which the 5
evaluation of Course
B. The relevance of assessment
Outcomes of first year
tools used (4)
is based

Tier II
157 Institutions
 National Board of Accreditation
National Board of Accreditation

Record the attainment Verify the records as per the Overall

8.4.2. of Course Outcomes 5 benchmark set for the courses Marks for
of all first year courses (5) 8.4

Attainment of
8.5. Program Outcomes of 20
all first year courses

A.Process of computing
POs/PSOs attainment level
Indicate results of from the COs of related first year
courses (5) Overall
8.5.1. evaluation of each 15
Marks for
relevant PO/PSO B. Verification of documents 8.5
validating the above process
(10)

Actions taken based Appropriate actions taken (5)

on the results of
8.5.2. 5
evaluation of relevant
POs /PSOs
Total of Criterion 8 50 Overall Marks for Criterion 8

Criterion 9: Student Support Systems (50)

Details of the mentoring system

Mentoring system to that has been developed for the Overall
9.1. help at individual 5 students for various purposes Marks for
level and also state the efficacy of 9.1
such system (5)

Feedback analysis and A. Methodology being followed

reward /corrective for analysis of feedback and its Overall
9.2. measures taken, if 10 effectiveness (5) Marks for
any 9.2
B. Record of corrective
measures taken (5)

Overall
Feedback collection, analysis
9.3. Feedback on facilities 5 Marks for
and corrective action (5)
9.3

A.   Scope for self-learning(2)

B.   Self Learning facilities, Overall

9.4. Self Learning 5 materials for learning beyond Marks for
syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, 9.4
MOOCs etc. and demonstrate
its effective utilization (3)

Tier II
Institutions 158
 National Board of Accreditation

A.Availability of career guidance

facilities (2)

Career Guidance, B. Counseling for higher studies Overall

9.5. Training, Placement 10 (GATE/GRE, GMAT, etc.) (2) Marks for
C. Pre-placement training (3) 9.5

D. Placement process and support

(3)

A. Entrepreneurship initiatives (1) Overall

9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell 5 Marks for
B. Data on students benefitted (4) 9.6
A. Availability of sports and
Co-curricular and cultural facilities (3) Overall
9.7. Extra-curricular 10 Marks for
B. NCC, NSS and other clubs (3)
Activities 9.7
C. Annual students activities (4)

Total of Criterion 9 50 Overall Marks for Criterion 9

Criterion 10: Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources (120)

Organization,
10.1. Governance and 40
Transparency

A. Availability of the Vision &

State the Vision and
10.1.1. Mission of the 5 Institute (2)
Institution
10
Governing body,
administrative setup,
functions of various
10.1.2. bodies, service rules
procedures,
recruitment and
promotional policies
Mission statements of the
B. Appropriateness/Relevance
of the Statements (3)
A.  Governing Body
Composition, senate, and all Overall
other academic and Marks for
administrative bodies; their 10.1
memberships, functions and
responsibilities; frequency of
the meetings; participation
details of external members
and attendance therein (4)
B. The published service rules,
policies and procedures with
year of publication (3)

C. Minutes of the meetings and

action-taken reports (3)

Tier II
159 Institutions
 National Board of Accreditation
National Board of Accreditation

A. List the names of the faculty

members who have been
delegated powers for taking
Decentralisation in administrative decisions (1)
working and
10.1.3. 10 B.Specify the mechanism and
grievance redressal
composition of grievance
mechanism
redressal cell (2)

C. Action taken report as per

‘B’ above (7)

A. Financial powers delegated

Overall
to the Principal, Heads of
Marks for
Departments and relevant in-
Delegation of 10.1
10.1.4. 10 charges (3)
financial powers
B. Demonstrate the utilization
of financial powers for each of
the assessment years (7)

A. Information on the policies,

Transparency and
availability of
10.1.5. correct/unambiguous 5
information in public
domain
rules, processes is to be made
available on web site (2)
B. Dissemination of the
information about student,
faculty and staff (3)

Budget Allocation, Expenditure per student: ....................................

Utilization, and
10.2. 30
Public Accounting at
Institute level Fee per student: .................................................

A. Quantum of budget
Adequacy of Budget allocation for three years (5)
10.2.1. 10 Overall
allocation B. Justification of budget
Marks for
allocated for three years (5)
10.2
Utilization of Budget utilization for three
10.2.2. 15
allocated funds years (15)
Availability of the
audited statements Availability of Audited
10.2.3. 5
on the institute’s statements on website (5)
website

Program Specific
10.3. To be evaluated in consultation with the
Budget Allocation, 30
Program Experts
Utilization

A. Quantum of budget Overall

Adequacy of budget allocation for three years (5) Marks for
10.3.1. 10
allocation 10.3
B.  Justification of budget
allocated for three years (5)

Utilization of Budget utilization for three

10.3.2. 20
allocated funds years (20)

Tier II
Institutions 160
 National Board of Accreditation
National Board of Accreditation
10.4 Library and Internet 20

A. Availability of relevant
Quality of learning learning resources including e-
10.4.1. 10 resources and Digital Library (7)
resources (hard/soft)
B. Accessibility to students (3)
Overall
A. Available bandwidth (4) Marks for
10.4
B. Wi Fi availability (2)

10.4.2. Internet 10 C. Internet access in labs,

classrooms, library and offices
of all Departments (2)

D. Security mechanism (2)

Total of Criterion 10 120 Overall Marks for Criterion 10

Tier II
161 Institutions