The document summarizes the risk analysis of a project, identifying several key risks:
1) Lack of trained personnel on environmental, health, and safety issues due to extended work hours could impact objectives, with a probability of 5 and impact of 6.
2) Insufficient internal auditors to ensure compliance could highly impact objectives, with a probability of 6 and impact of 7.
3) Accidents from lack of safety signs on old machines poses a potential hazard.
4) Limited budget to upgrade old equipment could impact energy reduction goals.
5) Suppliers not implementing environmental management systems poses an external risk rated at 5 for probability and 7 for impact.
6) Resistance to cultural change from workers
The document summarizes the risk analysis of a project, identifying several key risks:
1) Lack of trained personnel on environmental, health, and safety issues due to extended work hours could impact objectives, with a probability of 5 and impact of 6.
2) Insufficient internal auditors to ensure compliance could highly impact objectives, with a probability of 6 and impact of 7.
3) Accidents from lack of safety signs on old machines poses a potential hazard.
4) Limited budget to upgrade old equipment could impact energy reduction goals.
5) Suppliers not implementing environmental management systems poses an external risk rated at 5 for probability and 7 for impact.
6) Resistance to cultural change from workers
The document summarizes the risk analysis of a project, identifying several key risks:
1) Lack of trained personnel on environmental, health, and safety issues due to extended work hours could impact objectives, with a probability of 5 and impact of 6.
2) Insufficient internal auditors to ensure compliance could highly impact objectives, with a probability of 6 and impact of 7.
3) Accidents from lack of safety signs on old machines poses a potential hazard.
4) Limited budget to upgrade old equipment could impact energy reduction goals.
5) Suppliers not implementing environmental management systems poses an external risk rated at 5 for probability and 7 for impact.
6) Resistance to cultural change from workers
✓ The second risk that we can analyze is: ✓ The first risk that we find is: Good morning, everybody, today I would like “Lacking of internal auditors to “Lacking of trained personnel on to discuss the Risk analysis and Probability compare EMS requirements” – To EHS due to long and extended Impact Matrix of our project. have internal auditors takes long working hours” – Normally the hours of training, that means that schedule of the company is so tight To begin with, I would like to show you the we have to invest money and more that we have to plan very good the scale that we consider in our project to time to get the objectives of our training time to don’t stop the evaluate every risk after the identifying project, the probability is 6 because production line. This is something process: we can manage that, but the impact that we can control that’s why we in our objectives is really high have 5 in probability, but if we are we can see that we used a scale from 1 to 9 because we need them to guide us no able to plan this training we where 1 is the lowest value and 9 is the through all the process. wont get the objectives of the highest value. Generally, the risk with low project that’s why the impact will probability of occurrence has a high value on A response could be to hire new personnel be a bit high. impact. with internal auditors competency in their cv *** or get this service from an external while we A response could be to plan the training at get the accreditation. the end of the work schedule to face this *** difficulty and get the highest number of workers trained ✓ The next risk that we can see is: ✓ The next risk that we can see is: ✓ The next risk that we can see is: “Accidents due to lack of safety “Limited Budget for equipment “Lacking of certified suppliers/ signs in "out of date" machines” – changes and replace old machines Suppliers don’t implement EMS Whether you work in an office with high energy consumptions” – (Environmental Management space or manufacturing setting, just Energy initiatives tend to focus System)” – One of the changes of glance around: safety signs are all primarily on improving operations ISO 14001:2015 that may not be so around us. Other than being a legal with existing infrastructure. obvious is how your organization requirement in some cases, safety However, investments in new manages outsourced services and signs help to promote a safe, technology and infrastructure can suppliers, and ensuring that this is responsible environment for help industrial organizations make a aligned with the terms of the ISO employees and visitors. Sometimes stronger, faster impact on energy 14001:2015 standard, but this is an in old machines these cards have and sustainability. external risk because also depends been removed and this becomes in of the suppliers that’s why we a potential hazard. A response could be performing a cost consider 5 in probability and 7 in analysis with different providers not only impact. A response could be signaling of the different local, moreover includes the reliability areas according to the environmental culture, engineering department in this analysis to A response could be to give accompaniment I mean use materials environmentally friendly know how much money we are going to save in the implementation of the standard for and with the environment protection like turn doing these changes. suppliers. off the machine for saving energy when you *** are not using the equipment. ✓ Finally, the last risk that we are going to analyze is: “Resistance to change on the part of workers to reach environmental culture causing delays in goals” – One of the most critical failures to change is employees’ attitudes toward change. There are many reasons for resistance, but, resistance is rooted in fear of the unknown. People are biologically wired to look for patterns and predictability, and any uncertainty can trigger anxiety
A response could be to educate the
employees on the value of the change to show the benefits of implementing the standard, communicate early and often the changes. Now, lets continue with my colleague Rebecca…