Facility Roof Survey: Prepared For: Prepared by

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 39

Facility Roof Survey

Prepared for: Prepared by:


Mr. John Doe Mr. Adam Lenhart
Sample Manufacturing EMR Technologies
4th Street 201 E Auglaize Street
Kalida, Ohio 45853 Wapakoneta, Ohio 45895

Sample Manufacturing

Inspection Date: July 20, 2004


Mr. John Doe
Sample Manufacturing
4th Street
Kalida, Ohio 45853 45853

Subject: Sample Manufacturing Roof

In accordance with your request, a visual inspection of the roof at the referenced building was conducted on Jul 20, 2004. The
purpose of the inspection was to obtain a general overview of the current condition of the roof and to provide recommendations
for replacement of the existing roof as well as related budget cost estimates for the work.

The building is of masonry and steel reinforced concrete construction and is two stories in height. The roof area consists of
eight (8) roof sections. The existing roof is comprised of a several types of edpm and shingle roofing systems adhered,
ballasted and mechanically attached to the decking. The roof system is in poor condition and is leaking throughout the interior
of the building. Numerous holes and other breaches in the roof membrane were observed and are noted here in this report.

Total removal and replacement or repair of the existing roofing systems is recommended at this time. Budget cost estimates for
the replacement and repairs are included in this report. We have also included repair recommendations and estimates for each
roof section as well, to help you budget accordingly. The level of importance for work varies from roof to roof, below is a
prioritized list from worst to best for you to consider when planning the completion of this work.

ROOF AREA PRIORITIZATION LIST :

1) Roof #8
2) Roof #1
3) Roof #2
4) Roof #6
5) Roof #5
6) Roof #3
7) Roof #4
8) Roof #7

It is understood that the foregoing information as well as the information contained in this report is based on visual
observations only.Additional testing would be needed to verify deckings structural integrity and the presence of asbestos
containing materials (ACM's) in any of the existing roofing components. It is further understood that the cost estimates offered
are for budgeting purposes only.

Please feel free to contact me at (419) 739-2751, if you have any questions or if you require any additional assistance.

Sincerely,

Adam Lenhart
EMR Technologies
201 East Auglaize Street
Wapakoneta, Ohio 45895
Sample Manufacturing
4th Street
Kalida, Ohio 45853

Roof #6

Roof #4 Roof #2

Roof #1

Roof #5

Roof #3
Roof #7

Roof #8

Prepared By: EMR Technologies


Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing

Facility Summary

Client Name: Sample Manufacturing

Facility Name: Sample Manufacturing

Facility Address: 4th Street


Kalida, Ohio 45853

Roof Inspection Date: July 20, 2004

Recommendations - Summary
Section Name Replacement Value Activity Amount $
1 NP System $85,120 Replacement/Repair Pg 6
2 Shingle $42,432 Replacement/Repair Pg 9
3 Ballasted Rear Addition $52,800 Repair Pg 13
4 Fully Adhered Front $20,416 Repair Pg 18
5 Ballasted Upper Level $14,144 Repair Pg 24
6 Lower Front Gymnasium $71,200 Repair Pg 30
7 Upper Gymnasium $115,200 Repair Pg 32
8 Lower Rear Gymansium $22,400 Replacement/Repair Pg 37
$423,712 See Pages

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 2 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility:Sample Manufacturing NP System Roof 1

Roof Name: NP System

Roof Designation: 1

Existing System Type: Unballasted EPDM Button Bown

Roof Size: 10,640 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $85,120

Year Installed: 1980 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: Slight

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Poor

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 3 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing NP System Roof 1

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Tectum Laid - in - place
Insulation Perlite Hot asphalt
Waterproofing Coal tar pitch Coal tar pitch
Insulation Isocyanurate Mechanically attached
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Button down

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration and multiple roof layers.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 2

Type: Crazed flashing

Severity: Moderate

Details: Crazed flashing

Degradation of the flashing products is due


to exposure to UV rays. Flashings with
minor crazing exhibit a mud cracked
appearance in the top surface of the
membrane. In extreme cases, the crazing can
progress to the point that the flashing cracks.

Continued exposure of crazed flashings to


UV rays permit the deterioration to progress.
If not addressed, cracks or splits in the
flashings can occur. Moisture entering at
such splits can cause deterioration of
adjacent roof areas.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 4 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing NP System Roof 1

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 4

Type: Hole

Severity: Moderate

Details: Hole

Penetration thru the membrane surface due


in most cases to physical abuse.

Failure to repair holes in the roof membrane


will permit water to infiltrate the system
causing premature failure of that area of
roof. Insulation performance will also be
degraded due to the saturation.

Photo #: 3

Type: Insulation deterioration

Severity: Major

Details: Insulation deterioration

Deterioration of insulation products can be


caused by saturation with moisture or due to
excessive rooftop traffic. If exposed to
moisture, fiberboard products will break
down over time.

Insulation deterioration will make the roof


more susceptible to damage from a wind
related event. As a result of the collapse of
the insulation structure, fasteners are raised
above the roof surface tenting the membrane,
making it more susceptible to damage from
traffic.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 5 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing NP System Roof 1

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Replacement/Repair High Below
Due to the Severity we recommend replacement of the total system, but we also have given you an option for repairs, on this
roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter the building.

We recommend the Following:

ROOF REPLACEMENT:

* Remove all roofing and insulation down to the tectum decking

* Furnish and Install a new complete 1/8" tapered isocyanurate insulation system.

* Install a new 36 mil reinforced Fibertite re-enforced elvaloy roofing system. Utilizing heat welded seams.

* Furnish and install new fabricated edge metals at the perimeter.

* Flash all units and penetrations to current manufacturer specifications.

* Furnish a new 15 total system warranty from the manufacturer.

Please Note: All bad decking to be replaced on a time and material basis.

REPLACEMENT COMPLETE FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 69, 996.00

ROOF REPAIRS:

* Cut out wet insulation in three major buckling areas where the insulation is buckling and replace with new insulation and
membrane. Tie into existing roof using current industry standards.

* Strip in all seams, units and perimeter using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 2,615 lineal feet)

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 16, 900.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 6 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Shingle Roof 2

Roof Name: Shingle

Roof Designation: 2

Existing System Type: Shingles

Roof Size: 14,144 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $42,432

Year Installed: 1990 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: 4 in 12

Drainage: Adequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? No

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Fair

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 7 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Shingle Roof 2

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Wood Mechanically attached
Membrane Shingles Mechanically attached

Overall Core Assessment


No Core performed on Shingle Area

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 7

Type: Buckling

Severity: Moderate

Details: Buckling

The shingles are showing signs of lateral


movement and are buckling together.

This eventually will allow the shingles to


crack and split and allow water to enter the
building.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 8 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Shingle Roof 2

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Replacement/Repair High Below
Due to the Severity we recommend replacement of the total system, but we also have given you an option for repairs, on this
roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter the building.

We recommend the Following:

ROOF REPLACEMENT NORTH SIDE ONLY:

* Remove all roofing and insulation down to the wood decking on the North side of the roof only.

* Install new 15# Felt paper to the decking.

* Along the gutter and rake edges install new ice and water shield.

* Install a new expansion joint / divider wall in these areas.

* Install new wall flashing to expansion joints.

* Install new metal expansion joint covers. Metal will be fabricated out of 24 gauge kynar finished steel.

* Install new 30 year ELK Prestique Shingles to Roof Areas.

* Replace the small EPDM roof connected to the North side of the roof and make the proper tie-in to manufacturer
specifications.

* Install new 24 gauge metal drip and rake edge to all perimeters.

* Flash all penetrations to industry standards.

Please Note: All bad decking to be placed on a time and material basis.

ROOF REPLACEMENT COMPLETE FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 25, 139.00

ROOF REPAIRS NORTH & SOUTH SIDE:

* Remove and dispose of three feet by thirty four feet section of shingles on North and South side of the shingle roof.

* Install a new expansion joint / divider wall in these areas.

* Install new wall flashing to expansion joints.

* Install new metal expansion joint covers. Metal will be fabricated out of 24 gauge kynar finished steel.

* Install new shingles to match existing shingles as closely as possible.

REPAIRS COMPLETE FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 5, 727.00

Alternate Repair #1: Remove and replace the existing damaged shingles only on the North and South Side ( No
expansion joint work). Complete for the Total Sum of $ 2, 250.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 9 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Rear Addition Roof 3

Roof Name: Ballasted Rear Addition

Roof Designation: 3

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Loose laid


w/ballast

Roof Size: 6,600 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $52,800

Year Installed: 1985 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: Slight

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Fair

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 10 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Rear Addition Roof 3

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Metal Mechanically attached
Insulation Expanded polystyrene Laid - in - place
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Loose laid
Surfacing Round river washed stone Laid - in - place

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 11

Type: Non Maintained equipment

Severity: Moderate

Details: Non Maintained equipment

Pipe, unit or other penetration through the


roof surface that has not been maintained.

Equipment is in such condition as to permit


water infiltration into the roof system.

Photo #: 9

Type: Patches

Severity: Moderate

Details: Patches

Patches indicate that a repair to the roof


membrane has taken place. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of patches may be an

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 11 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility:Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Rear Addition Roof 3

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

indication of a systemic problem with the


roof system. Patches may also be an
indication of an excessive roof traffic
condition.

Photo #: 10

Type: Repairs

Severity: Moderate

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 12 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility:Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Rear Addition Roof 3

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Repair Moderate Below
Due to the Severity we recommend repair of this roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter
the building.

We recommend the Following:

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Strip in all seams, units using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 260' lineal feet)

* Replace all existing 36" wall flashing around the entire perimeter. ( Total of 300' lineal feet)

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 5, 900.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 13 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Fully Adhered Front Roof 4

Roof Name: Fully Adhered Front

Roof Designation: 4

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Fully adhered

Roof Size: 2,552 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $20,416

Year Installed: 1990 (Estimated)

Height: 18 feet

Slope: Slight

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Fair

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 14 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Fully Adhered Front Roof 4

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Tectum Laid - in - place
Insulation Perlite Coal tar pitch
Membrane BUR - 4 ply Coal tar pitch
Insulation Isocyanurate Hot asphalt
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Cold adhesive

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration and multiple roof layers.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 14

Type: Fastener backout

Severity: Minor

Details: Fastener backout

The phenomenon where a screw-type


fastener will loosen itself by turning
counter-clockwise and back itself out due to
pulling or vibration of any component of the
roof system.

Fasteners in a roof system are used to secure


the roof system components to the structure.
When backout occurs, the integrity of the
roof system can be jeopardized.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 15 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Fully Adhered Front Roof 4

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 15

Type: Ponding

Severity: Moderate

Details: Ponding

The NRCA has classified "undesirable"


ponding water as standing for more than 48
hours though ponding can pose a threat in
even shorter time spans.

A matter of "deep" concern in the roofing


industry is the fact that a 1" deep pond
weighs 5.2 lbs / square foot and many
structures can not handle this extra load.

Ponding water can be traced to any of


several factors. First, a roof may pond water
as a result of poor housekeeping on the roof
which contributes to clogged drains, gutters
and downspouts. The build up of roof top
debris or displaced gravel ballast frequently
blocks water flow and creates ponds.
Secondly, the building's roof top drainage
system may not have been designed
properly. Finally, ponds form as a result of
such common conditions as building
settlement and deck deflection.

Since ponds occur in low areas of a roof, a


pond becomes a repository for debris,
sediment, and chemical emissions. Ponding
encourages microorganism and bacterial
degradation, roof deflection, magnified
ultraviolet exposure and ultimate premature
failure of the roof system.

If the roof membrane in a ponded area


sustains damage, all of this water may drain
into the roof system and into the building.

The additional weight load may pose a threat


to the structural integrity of the building,
with a very real possibility of collapse of the
roof in extreme cases.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 16 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Fully Adhered Front Roof 4

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 17

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Photo #: 13

Type: Splice lifting

Severity: Moderate

Details: Splice lifting

Splices or seams in single ply roof systems


can open due to issues related to improper
application techniques or to the products.
Splices are defined as open if the entire seam
area is delaminated permitting water to enter
the roof system. Less severe delamination of
the seam or localized splice lifting requires
attention but is not indicative of a systemic
condition.

Splice lifting needs to be addressed to


maintain the system in a watertight
condition. Failure to address a lifting splice
condition could lead to a progressive failure
in the underlying substrate.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 17 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Fully Adhered Front Roof 4

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Repair Low Below
Due to the Severity we recommend repair of this roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter
the building.

We recommend the Following:

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Strip in all seams, units using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 528 lineal feet)

* Replace all existing 36" wall flashing around the entire perimeter. ( Total of 220 lineal feet)

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 6, 850.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 18 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Roof Name: Ballasted Upper Level

Roof Designation: 5

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Loose laid


w/ballast

Roof Size: 1,768 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $14,144

Year Installed: 1985 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: Slight

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Fair

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 19 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Tectum Laid - in - place
Insulation Expanded polystyrene Loose laid
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Loose laid
Surfacing Round river washed stone Laid - in - place

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 23

Type: Debris

Severity: Major

Details: Debris

Any foreign objects on the surface of the


roof. These foreign objects could include
vegetation such as dead leaves and man
made objects such as broken glass, nails, etc.

The build up of roof top debris frequently


impedes positive drainage, clogs drains and
results in the development of ponding water
conditions. In it's extreme, this could result
in roof collapse.

Sharp foreign objects can puncture a roof


membrane if stepped upon , resulting in wet
insulation, roof leaks and interior damage.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 20 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 19

Type: Membrane shrinkage

Severity: Major

Details: Membrane shrinkage

Membrane shrinkage is caused by a variety


of conditions ranging from loss of
plasticizers within the membrane to
inadequate securement at wall flashings.
Inadequate securement is another common
cause of shrinkage that can lead to bridging
of flashing at the perimeter of the structure.

Failure to address severe shrinkage or


embrittlement can lead to catastrophic failure
of the roof system due to shattering.

Shrinkage due to inadequate secruement of


the flashings can lead to severe bridging
conditions. Shrinkage along the perimeter of
the building can lead to splits in the
flashings. Corrective action to alleviate the
condition by reducing stress can restore the
roof system.

Photo #: 22

Type: Membrane shrinkage

Severity: Major

Details: Membrane shrinkage

Membrane shrinkage is caused by a variety


of conditions ranging from loss of
plasticizers within the membrane to
inadequate securement at wall flashings.
Inadequate securement is another common
cause of shrinkage that can lead to bridging
of flashing at the perimeter of the structure.

Failure to address severe shrinkage or


embrittlement can lead to catastrophic failure

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 21 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

of the roof system due to shattering.

Shrinkage due to inadequate secruement of


the flashings can lead to severe bridging
conditions. Shrinkage along the perimeter of
the building can lead to splits in the
flashings. Corrective action to alleviate the
condition by reducing stress can restore the
roof system.

Photo #: 20

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 22 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo #: 21
Photo Details
Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Photo #: 24

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 23 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Ballasted Upper Level Roof 5

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Repair Moderate Below
Due to the Severity we recommend repair of this roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter
the building.

We recommend the Following:

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Strip in all seams, units using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 260' lineal feet)

* Replace all existing 36" wall flashing around the entire perimeter. ( Total of 300' lineal feet)

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 5, 850.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 24 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Roof Name: Lower Front Gymnasium

Roof Designation: 6

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Loose laid


w/ballast

Roof Size: 8,900 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $71,200

Year Installed: 1985 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: Flat

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Poor

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 25 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Metal Mechanically attached
Insulation Expanded polystyrene Loose laid
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Loose laid
Surfacing Round river washed stone Laid - in - place

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 36

Type: Debris

Severity: Minor

Details: Debris

Any foreign objects on the surface of the


roof. These foreign objects could include
vegetation such as dead leaves and man
made objects such as broken glass, nails, etc.

The build up of roof top debris frequently


impedes positive drainage, clogs drains and
results in the development of ponding water
conditions. In it's extreme, this could result
in roof collapse.

Sharp foreign objects can puncture a roof


membrane if stepped upon , resulting in wet
insulation, roof leaks and interior damage.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 26 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 29

Type: Leak at Drains

Severity: Major

Details: Leak at Drains

Drains are leaking and need investigated as


alot of water is drawn to these areas.

Photo #: 27

Type: Membrane shrinkage

Severity: Major

Details: Membrane shrinkage

Membrane shrinkage is caused by a variety


of conditions ranging from loss of
plasticizers within the membrane to
inadequate securement at wall flashings.
Inadequate securement is another common
cause of shrinkage that can lead to bridging
of flashing at the perimeter of the structure.

Failure to address severe shrinkage can lead


to catastrophic failure of the roof system due
to shattering.

Shrinkage due to inadequate secruement of


the flashings can lead to severe bridging
conditions. Shrinkage along the perimeter of
the building can lead to splits in the
flashings. Corrective action to alleviate the
condition by reducing stress can restore the
roof system.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 27 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 28

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Photo #: 30

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 28 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility:Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 31

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Photo #: 34

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 29 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Front Gymnasium Roof 6

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Repair High Below
Due to the Severity we recommend repair of this roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter
the building.

We recommend the Following:

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Strip in all seams, units using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 700 lineal feet)

* Replace all existing 36" wall flashing around the entire perimeter. ( Total of 800 lineal feet)

* Re Flash four 5" roof drains along the North Gym wall with new epdm, to meet current manufacturer specifications.

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 15, 250.00

Alternate #1 - Replace the tenting wall flashing and repair the drains along the North Gym Wall only.
Repairs complete for the total sum of $ 3, 450.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 30 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Upper Gymnasium Roof 7

Roof Name: Upper Gymnasium

Roof Designation: 7

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Fully adhered

Roof Size: 14,400 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $115,200

Year Installed: 1990 (Estimated)

Height: 28 feet

Slope: Moderate

Drainage: Adequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: Very sensitive

Currently Leaking? No

History of Leaking? No

Drainage and Leak Details: No History of problems with this roof.

Roof Condition Rating: Good

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 31 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Upper Gymnasium Roof 7

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Tectum Laid - in - place
Insulation Isocyanurate Mechanically attached
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Cold adhesive

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs that things are performing well.

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Repair Low Below
Due to the good only on this roof area situation we recommend maintenance repairs in the future. No work is necessary
though at this time.

We recommend the Following:

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Strip in all seams, wall and penetrations with new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 2,900 lineal feet)

REPAIRS COMPLETE FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 15, 175.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 32 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Rear Gymansium Roof 8

Roof Name: Lower Rear Gymansium

Roof Designation: 8

Existing System Type: Conventional Single ply - Loose laid


w/ballast

Roof Size: 2,800 sq. ft.

Estimated Replacement Cost: $22,400

Year Installed: 1990 (Estimated)

Height: 16 feet

Slope: Flat

Drainage: Inadequate

Leak Sensitivity Under Roof: High sensitivity

Currently Leaking? Yes

History of Leaking? Yes

Drainage and Leak Details: This roof has been leaking for several
years and deterioration has increased.

Roof Condition Rating: Poor

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 33 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Rear Gymansium Roof 8

Existing Roof System Construction


Layer Type Description Method of Attachment
Deck Tectum Laid - in - place
Insulation Isocyanurate Loose laid
Membrane Single ply - unreinforced Loose laid
Surfacing Round river washed stone Laid - in - place

Overall Core Assessment


Core shows signs of deterioration. Bad Decking was found in this area.

Existing Conditions
PHOTO DETAILS

Photo #: 37

Type: Deteriorated Decking

Severity: Major

Details: Deteriorated Decking

Bad Decking is when the current deck is not


structurally sound.

This is a major safety hazard and should be


addressed as soon as possible.

Photo #: 42

Type: Membrane shrinkage

Severity: Major

Details: Membrane shrinkage

Membrane shrinkage is caused by a variety


of conditions ranging from loss of
plasticizers within the membrane to
inadequate securement at wall flashings.
Inadequate securement is another common
cause of shrinkage that can lead to bridging

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 34 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Rear Gymansium Roof 8

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

of flashing at the perimeter of the structure.

Failure to address severe shrinkage or


embrittlement can lead to catastrophic failure
of the roof system due to shattering.

Shrinkage due to inadequate secruement of


the flashings can lead to severe bridging
conditions. Shrinkage along the perimeter of
the building can lead to splits in the
flashings. Corrective action to alleviate the
condition by reducing stress can restore the
roof system.

Photo #: 38

Type: Patches

Severity: Moderate

Details: Patches

Patches indicate that a repair to the roof


membrane has taken place. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of patches may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Patches may also be an
indication of an excessive roof traffic
condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 35 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Rear Gymansium Roof 8

Existing Conditions continued...


Photo Details

Photo #: 41

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Photo #: 45

Type: Repairs

Severity: Major

Details: Repairs

Repairs to the roof membrane are indicative


that remedial action was required to address
a deficiency in the system. Moisture
infiltration may have occurred in this area
prior to repair.

An excessive number of repairs may be an


indication of a systemic problem with the
roof system. Numerous repairs may also be
an indication of neglect or an excessive roof
traffic condition.

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 36 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004
Facility Roof Survey Facility: Sample Manufacturing Lower Rear Gymansium Roof 8

Recommendations
Type of Activity Urgency $
Replacement/Repair High Below
Due to the Severity we recommend replacement of the total system, but we also have given you an option for repairs, on this
roof area at this time. The roof is deteriorating and allowing water to enter the building.

We recommend the Following:

ROOF REPLACEMENT:

* Remove all roofing and insulation down to the tectum decking

* Furnish and Install a new complete 1/8" tapered isocyanurate insulation system.

* Install a new 36 mil reinforced Fibertite re-enforced elvaloy roofing system. Utilizing heat welded seams.

* Furnish and install new fabricated edge metals at the perimeter.

* Flash all units and penetrations to current manufacturer specifications.

* Furnish a new 15 total system warranty from the manufacturer.

Please Note: All bad decking to be replaced on a time and material basis.

REPLACEMENT COMPLETE FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 27, 614.00

ENTIRE ROOF REPAIRS:

* Cut out roofing & wet insulation in area where the decking is gone and replace with new metal deck insulation and
membrane. Tie into existing roof using current industry standards. (20' x 20')

* Strip in all seams, units using new 9" pressure sensitive flashing. (Total of 350 lineal feet)

* Replace all existing 36" wall flashing around the entire perimeter. ( Total of 350 lineal feet)

* Walk remainder of roof and patch any holes, tears found.

REPAIRS COMPLETED FOR THE TOTAL SUM OF $ 11, 447.00

Prepared by: EMR Technologies Page 37 Inspection Date: July 20, 2004

You might also like