Locke's social contract theory argues that people in a state of nature entered a contract to form societies for their protection and well-being. In the state of nature without government, people could harm each other over property disputes, so they willingly gave up some freedoms in exchange for security and order under an authoritative government. However, this government must also have limitations to prevent it from abusing its power, as unlimited sovereignty could cause more harm. Locke believed people retained natural rights even under a social contract and could change the government if it failed to protect these rights.
Original Description:
Original Title
This amendment is to be a serere blow on the rule of law
Locke's social contract theory argues that people in a state of nature entered a contract to form societies for their protection and well-being. In the state of nature without government, people could harm each other over property disputes, so they willingly gave up some freedoms in exchange for security and order under an authoritative government. However, this government must also have limitations to prevent it from abusing its power, as unlimited sovereignty could cause more harm. Locke believed people retained natural rights even under a social contract and could change the government if it failed to protect these rights.
Locke's social contract theory argues that people in a state of nature entered a contract to form societies for their protection and well-being. In the state of nature without government, people could harm each other over property disputes, so they willingly gave up some freedoms in exchange for security and order under an authoritative government. However, this government must also have limitations to prevent it from abusing its power, as unlimited sovereignty could cause more harm. Locke believed people retained natural rights even under a social contract and could change the government if it failed to protect these rights.
This amendment is to be a serere blow on the rule of law.
This limitless ultimate
sovereignty caused the country in severe economic crisis. It resulted in long and ques for fuel, food cricis and long power cuts. This is the state of nature in practical sense Due to the citizens peaceful protest termed “Aragalaya” demanded a constitutional reform, the 21st amendment to the 1978 Constitution was only an eye washer. My point of view is that we need a new constitution to our country that reflects the values, ensuring rule of law and proper constitutional governance.
John Locke’s contribution to the social contract theory
Lockean version of social contract theory is more pragmatic, wide ranging and rational. In his book Tow Treaties of Government, Law of nature is illustrated as followers. Law of nature is a status that people were living in peace and harmony, in the basis of all morality, given to them by God, commands that they must not harm with regards to their blife, health liberty or possessions. He strongly believed that this peaceful environment can certainly devolve in to a state of warover property dispules. Furthermore, limitless ultimate power vesting in political authority (without a mechanism for any restrictions or any legal authority’s sivialance) would end up in more harm than benefits. As a result of this philosophy people realized it is always better to have a contract with legal authorities, which could oversee the disputes between rights to maintain an orderly society. Hobbes always places importance on the fact that the political body should have limitations. When in the Low of nature, where there’s on civil power to whom men can appeal, people can defend themselves by bringing force against them. Thus people make a compact lave from the state of nature and form one political body under one government and submit themselves to the will of that body. Locke’s express a comprehensive and lucrative analogy regarding the formation of the social contract. Men were in a social contract with their sovereigns for the universal and inalienable rights which had a divine origin. Rights to life is one of the universal and inalienable right expressly guaranteed by almost all the constitutions across the world. The indian constitution article 21 guarantees the right to life. This explicit reference has expanded its scope by judicial activities through various cases. With regards to the Sri Lankan constitution there is no guaranteed fundamental right to life. Article 12 and article 14 collectively, impliedly recognize the right to life. In order to impliedly recognize these rights and do justice to people the judge should be a bold spirit judge, not a timorous sole judge. This is well described by lord Denning. To empower law makers to expand the scope of achieving justice those bold spirited judges are justice Mark Fernando, Justice Shirani Thilakawardana, justice C.J.Weeramanthri, Justice Bagawathi and Justice Krishna Aiyar. Therefore Indian social contract is more sophi