WORKSHEET 1

One-way ANOVA: SKOR ICIP-ICIP versus CAHAYA

Method
Null hypothesis All means are equal
Alternative hypothesis Not all means are equal
Significance level α = 0,01

Equal variances were assumed for the analysis.

Factor Information
Factor Levels Values
CAHAYA 3 A; B; C
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
CAHAYA 2 22,167 11,0833 14,78 0,001
Error 9 6,750 0,7500    
Total 11 28,917      
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
0,866025 76,66% 71,47% 58,50%
Means
CAHAYA N Mean StDev 99% CI
A 4 9,000 0,816 (7,593; 10,407)
B 4 8,000 0,816 (6,593; 9,407)
C 4 5,750 0,957 (4,343; 7,157)

Pooled StDev = 0,866025

Tukey Pairwise Comparisons

Grouping Information Using the Tukey Method and 99% Confidence
CAHAYA N Mean Grouping
A 4 9,000 A  
B 4 8,000 A B
C 4 5,750   B

Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.

Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means

Difference Difference SE of Adjusted
of Levels of Means Difference 99% CI T-Value P-Value
B-A -1,000 0,612 (-3,351; 1,351) -1,63 0,282
C-A -3,250 0,612 (-5,601; -0,899) -5,31 0,001
C-B -2,250 0,612 (-4,601; 0,101) -3,67 0,013
Individual confidence level = 99,60%