Dedp 2023 2028 Final

I.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In consonance with DepEd mandates and in pursuance of Ambisyon Natin 2040,

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2030, the Basic Education Development Plan 2030
(BEDP 2030), and the Regional Education Development Plan (REDP) 2022-2028, the
Division of Dipolog City presents this basic education strategic roadmap that charts the
path, plans, and actions to improve the quality and delivery of basic education, and
addresses current and future challenges: the Division Education Development Plan
(DEDP).
The DEDP is anchored on the four pillars of basic education – Access, Equity,
Quality and Resilience and Well-Being. It also resonates the critical components of
MATATAG and the DepEd battlecry “Bansang Makabata. Batang Makabansa” and
ZamPen’s “Bring Them, Keep Them, Teach Them, and Protect Them.” In order to
achieve the goals of basic education, the DEDP provides the specific directions and
initiatives that will render each pillar operational with carefully designed enabling
mechanisms for governance and operations that are translated into the Division RACE:
• Reaching out to all school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults for
access to relevant basic learning opportunities.
• Allocating the best available resources according to learners’ needs.
• Capacitating teachers and instructional leaders toward child-centered

instruction anchored on curriculum standards; and
• Empowering learners to become active agents of nation-building.
In particular, the Division RACE spells out the following:
Reaching out (Access) emphasizes the need for all school-age children, out-of-
school youth, and adults to have access to basic learning opportunities. The indicators for
ACCESS are used to assess the level of participation of school-age children – learners in a
particular level of education.
Under Allocating (Equity), all school-age children, youth, and adult learners in
disadvantaged situations are provided inclusive basic education learning opportunities –
formal and informal, and receive appropriate equity initiatives in terms of learning
resources.
Under Capacitating (Quality), teachers and instructional leaders are capacitated

and provided technical assistance toward child-centered instructions anchored on
curriculum standards. The competence of teachers and instructional leaders are
strengthened along the professional standards for teachers and school heads across career
stages toward the achievement of National Achievement Test performance indicators and
targets.
Empowering (Resiliency and Well-being) means strengthening the capacity of

instructional leaders and teachers to provide a learning environment that is safe and
conducive for learning and promotes the rights, well-being and protections of learners.
Also included is the provision of Child-friendly schools. A Child-friendly School is more
DEDP 2023-2028 1 Dipolog City Division

than just a place for formal learning. Foremost, it is an institution that recognizes and
respects the range of rights of children, and not just their right to be educated. These
rights also include their rights to be healthy, to be given opportunities for play and leisure,
to be protected from harm and abuse, to express their views freely, and to participate in
decision-making according to their evolving capacities (UNESCO).
As DepEd moves forward with a strategic roadmap to address the challenges of basic
education, it has prioritized actions and set a new direction for the Department through
the new education strategy dubbed MATATAG.
• MAke the curriculum relevant to produce competent and job-ready, active,

and responsible citizens.
• TAke steps to accelerate the delivery of basic education facilities and services.
• TAke good care of learners by promoting learner well-being, inclusive
education, and a positive learning environment; and
• Give support to teachers to teach better.
All these are what SDO Dipolog endeavors to provide learners in the delivery of basic
education services toward the achievement of the DepEd Mission, Vision and Goal.

II. BACKGROUND
A. CONTEXT OF DIPOLOG CITY
Dipolog City is located in the province of Zamboanga del Norte, Philippines. This capital
city is situated on the western coast of Mindanao island, and has a population of around
140,000 people. Dipolog City is the second congressional district of the aforementioned
province and has 21 barangays, as shown below.
Table 1. Barangays of Dipolog City.
Barangays of Dipolog
Administration Population
Barangay 5 year
Barangay Class 2020 [6] 2015 [12]
Captain[11] change
Urban
Barra Moman P. Apura 3,331 3,466 −3.89%
(Poblacion)
Urban Florenda R.
Biasong 3,128 3,496 −10.53%
(Poblacion) Agustin
Urban
Central Ocibys C. Sybico 1,735 2,029 −14.49%
(Poblacion)
Cogon Rural Paquito L. Paño 1,982 1,665 +19.04%
Dicayas Urban Tito C. Maligro 9,974 9,618 +3.70%
Rosebeth B.
Diwan Rural 3,549 3,747 −5.28%
Turno
Estaka Urban
Irvin A. Banga 7,806 7,590 +2.85%
(Estaca)[a] (Poblacion)
Galas Urban Elmer B. Vallecer 19,508 17,540 +11.22%

Barangay 5 year
Barangay Class 2020 [6] 2015 [12]
Captain[11] change
Gulayon Urban Jodrell D. Nayal 7,896 7,359 +7.30%
Paterno L.
Lugdungan Rural 2,533 2,269 +11.64%
Laclac, Jr.
Jonathan L.
Minaog Urban 9,402 7,904 +18.95%
Pelegrino
Urban Elena T.
Miputak 7,667 7,997 −4.13%
(Poblacion) Gamalinda
Olingan Urban Ofelia G. Acis 15,258 13,250 +15.15%
Albello M.
Punta Rural 3,134 2,923 +7.22%
Padayhag
Ester S.
San Jose Rural 1,009 1,068 −5.52%
Obnimaga
Rogelio D.
Sangkol Rural 2,073 2,092 −0.91%
Regañon
Santa
Urban Benjie E. Maligro 8,475 8,762 −3.28%
Filomena
Santa Isabel Urban Rodel C. Enero 7,777 7,665 +1.46%
Julius B.
Sicayab Urban 8,927 7,979 +11.88%
Gajonera

Barangay 5 year
Barangay Class 2020 [6] 2015 [12]
Captain[11] change
Romeo S. Gomez,
Sinaman Rural 1,982 2,033 −2.51%
Sr.
Edgardo I.
Turno Urban 10,995 10,307 +6.68%
Cohena
City of Dipolog 138,141 130,759 +5.65%
Source: Philippine Statistics Authority – Philippine Standard Geographic Code –

City of Dipolog – Barangays
Dipolog is known for its rich agricultural resources, and is a major producer of coconut,
rubber, and other crops. According to the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), in 2017,
the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Dipolog City was Php 3.5 billion. The agriculture,
fishery, and forestry sector contributed the largest share to the city's GDP at 29.5%,
followed by the wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles and
personal and household goods (22.9%), and the manufacturing sector (22.4%). The PSA
also reported that in 2019, the total labor force of Dipolog City was around 72,000. The
agriculture, fishery and forestry sector employed the largest number of workers at 27.8%,
followed by wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles and personal
and household goods (24.2%), and manufacturing (18.8%). The PSA estimates that
Dipolog City's poverty incidence rate was 25.8% in 2015, which is the most recent year for
which data is available.
In terms of population, Dipolog City is a melting pot of diverse ethnic groups. The city is
primarily populated by the Subanen, who are the indigenous people of the region. They
are known for their rich culture and traditions, including their traditional dances, music,
and crafts. Dipolog also has a significant population of Cebuanos, who are Visayan people
from the island of Cebu, known for their strong religious beliefs and their strong sense of
community. There are also a significant number of people of Tausug, Samal and Maranao
descent in the city. These ethnic groups are known for their rich cultural heritage and
their traditional ways of life. Additionally, there is a considerable population of Chinese
and other Asian immigrants, as well as a small but growing number of expatriates and
foreigners. Despite the diversity of ethnic groups, Dipolognons have managed to maintain
a harmonious and peaceful co-existence among different ethnic groups, and the city is
known for its rich cultural heritage.

Economic-wise, Dipolog City is primarily driven by agriculture, with coconut, rubber, and
other crops being the major sources of income for many local residents. Fishing is also an
important industry, as it has access to the Sulu Sea. The city has a fish port and a fish
market where fish and seafood are sold to the local and nearby areas. Moreover, small and
medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are significant contributors to the economy. The city has
a growing number of SMEs engaged in manufacturing, trading, and services which provide
employment opportunities for the local residents. The city has a number of industrial
parks and special economic zones that provide the necessary infrastructure and support
services to attract new businesses and investment. Tourism is also an emerging industry
in Dipolog City, thanks to its beautiful beaches, natural landscapes, and rich cultural
heritage. The city attracts both local and foreign visitors, who contribute to the local
economy through tourism-related activities such as accommodation, transportation, and
recreation. The city government and the private sector are working together to promote
economic development and attract more investments.
B. BASIC EDUCATION SITUATION
The Schools Division Office (SDO) of Dipolog City promotes expanding educational
opportunities in order to level the playing field for all people and to increase the longevity
and general well-being of the Dipolognon community. At present, Dipolog City has 4 school
districts with 10 clusters, 76 school campuses, 48 public schools (47 under DepEd, 1
under DOST), and 18 private schools, with a total personnel of 1,730. Of the 76 schools
across the city, the East and West districts posted the top 2 highest numbers of enrolled
learners for School Year (SY) 2022-2023, with 15,053 and 8,616 enrollees respectively.
The private sector displayed the lowest count of enrollees at 4,831 from the total number
of 43,193. During the enrolment period of the aforementioned school year, SDO Dipolog
garnered the TOP 2 nationwide, among 224 SDOs, with an increment rate of 105%. Figure
1 presents the Basic Education Statistics for SY 2022-2023.
Figure 1. Basic Education Statistics SY2022-2023

To support the office's efforts in addressing the significant effects of learning gaps caused
on by the COVID-19 pandemic, the DepEd SDO Dipolog promotes for resource
mobilization and enhancing partnership engagements. For the SY 2022-223, 3% (2
schools) of Dipolog City's 76 schools used double-shifting class system, while 97% (74
schools) used the more common single-shift. Table 2 displays the various learning
modalities for the aforementioned SY, demonstrating that SDO Dipolog has switched
entirely to in-person instruction, particularly with public schools.
Table 2. Learning Modalities for SY 2022-2023 as of January 16, 2023.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRIVATE SCHOOLS SUCs/LUCs
LEARNING DELIVERY TO BE LEARNING DELIVERY TO BE LEARNING DELIVERY TO BE
IMPLEMENTED IMPLEMENTED IMPLEMENTED
SCHOOL TYPE
5 days In- Blended Full 5 days In- Blended Full 5 days In- Blended Full
Person Learning Distance Person Learning Distance Person Learning Distance
Classes Modality Learning Classes Modality Learning Classes Modality Learning
Purely Elementary (K-6 only) 33 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0
Purely JHS (7-10 only) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Purely SHS (11-12 only) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Secondary (7-12 only) 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Intergrated (K-10) 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0
Intergrated (K-12) 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Key Performance Indicators
Gross Enrollment Rate

Gross Enrollment Rate (GER) is the total enrollment covering both public and
private schools for a particular education level, regardless of age, expressed as a
percentage of the eligible official school-age population of that particular education level
in a given school year (SY). In DepEd Dipolog, we have categorized all levels into four:
Kindergarten, Elementary (Grades 1-6), Junior High School or JHS (Grades 7-10), and
Senior High School or SHS (Grades 11-12). Per analysis, DepEd Dipolog garnered the
following gross rates for the SY 2021-2022 enrollment: 113.44% for Kindergarten, which
has an increment of 17.75% from the previous SY; 107.14% for Elementary, with a
decrement of 2.51%; 128.03% for JHS, which has an increment of 1.59%; and 126.40%
for SHS, with a increment of 17.73%. These data shows that there is a high degree access
to Kindergarten, JHS, and SHS for SY 2021-2022. DepEd Dipolog continues to be
consistent with enrollment and shall improve on where it’s lacking.
Table 3. DepEd Dipolog Gross Enrollment Rates for all levels.

Baseline
SY 2019- SY 2020- SY 2021-
Grade Level SY 2018- 2020 2021 2022
2019
Kindergarten 117.33% 107.13% 95.69% 113.44%
Elementary
113.69% 115.29% 109.65% 107.14%
(Grades 1-6)
JHS
127.03% 129.63% 126.44% 128.03%
(Grades 7-10)

SHS
(Grades 11- 102.84% 107.48% 108.67% 126.40%

12)
Net Enrollment Rate

Net Enrollment Rate (NER) provides a more precise measurement of the extent of
participation in a particular level of education of children belonging to the official primary
school age.
Table 4 DepEd Dipolog Net Enrollment Rate for all levels
Baseline
SY 2019- SY 2020- SY 2021-
Grade Level SY 2018- 2020 2021 2022
2019
Kindergarten 83.47% 78.36% 72.49% 87.18%
Elementary
106.02% 108.32% 103.93% 101.65%
(Grades 1-6)
JHS
103.37% 103.81% 101.93% 104.24%
(Grades 7-10)
SHS
(Grades 11- 68.66% 58.82% 62.76% 72.52%

12)
School Leaver Rate

School Leaver Rate (SLR) is also known as dropout rate. It covers both
pupils/students who do not finish a particular grade level as well as those who finish but
fail to enroll in the next grade level the following school year. DepEd Dipolog garnered low
school leaver rates: 0.34% in Elementary; and 4.07% in Secondary. However, this is quite
concerning since both rates increased compared to the previous SY.
Table 5. DepEd Dipolog School Leaver Rate.

SY SY SY SY SY SY
Grade
2015- 2016- 2017- 2018- 2019- 2021-
Level
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2022
Elementary 0.97% 2.48% 1.75% 0.69% 0.00% 0.34%
Secondary 8.01% 8.45% 5.31% 5.57% 3.33% 4.07%
Regional Achievement Test (RAT) Mean Percentage Score (MPS)

The Regional Achievement Test (RAT) was conducted by the Regional Office, through
the Curriculum and Learning Management Division (CLMD), in partnership with the
Quality Assurance Division (QAD) which aimed to provide a systematic and objective
evaluation of a learner’s performance and to use its result in improving educational
outcomes for all learners and as a feedback mechanism for the efficiency of the various
learning modalities implemented for the School Year 2021-2022.
Generally speaking, the results of the RAT in Dipolog City Division showed that that
the students in all key stages did not perform well, with the lowest score being 40.46% in
English-4 and 50.80% for Grade 7. This indicates a strong need for intensive intervention
programs and activities that would enhance the students’ understanding and mastery of
the subjects.
Table 6.1. Regional Achievement Test MPS for Grades 4 and 7

Divisi
Grade Engl Scie Filipi EPP/ on
Math AP ESP MAP
Level ish nce no TLE Total
EH MPS
50.1 44.14 49.66 50.34 44.60 44.14 40.46 45.46 56.26

Gr 4
1% % % % % % % % %
64.1 58.39 50.80 57.47 54.71 55.17 53.56 55.86 56.26

Gr 7
4% % % % % % % % %
Cohort Survival Rate

Cohort Survival Rate (CSR) shows the percentage of a cohort of pupils/students who
are able to reach Grade 6 or Grade 10. For DepEd Dipolog, the CSRs are the following:
84.87% in Elementary and 86.9% in Secondary for SY 2021-2022.
Table 7. DepEd Dipolog Cohort Survival Rate.

Baseline
SY 2018- SY 2019- SY 2020-
Grade Level SY 2017- 2019 2020 2021
2018
Elementary
92.24% 96.63% 100.00% 84.87%
(Grades 1-6)
JHS
84.92% 83.79% 89.98% 86.93%
(Grade

Completion Rate
Completion Rate (ComR) measures the percentage of Grades 1 and 7 entrants who
graduate in elementary/secondary education. Data shows that in DepEd Dipolog, the
ComR in Elementary is 84.49%, while in Secondary it’s 85.73%.
Table 8. DepEd Dipolog Completion Rate.

Baseline
SY 2018- SY 2019- SY 2020-
Grade Level SY 2017- 2019 2020 2021
2018
Elementary
92.01% 95.87% 100.00% 84.49%
(Grades 1-6)
JHS
82.88% 81.25% 88.68% 85.73%
(Grade

IV. STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS
This section presents the basic education strategic roadmap of Dipolog City Division that
charts the path – plans and actions to improve the quality and delivery of basic education, and in
addressing its current and future challenges.
DEPED VISION AND MISSION
VISION
We dream of Filipinos who passionately lover their country and

whose values and competencies enable them to realize their full
potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation. As a
learner-centered public institution, the Department of Education
continuously improves itself to better serve its stakeholders.
Figure ____. DepEd Vision
MISSION
To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality,

equitable, culture-based, and complete basic education where:
o Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe

and motivating environment.
o Teachers facilitate learning and constantly nurture
every learner.
o Administrator and Staff as stewards of the institution,
ensure an enabling and supportive environment for
effective learning to happen.
o Family, Community and other Stakeholders are
actively engaged and share responsibility for developing
life-long learners.
Figure ____. DepEd Mission
GOAL
All Filipinos are able to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully in building a
cohesive nation.
SECTOR OUTCOME
Basic Education Filipino learners have the physical, cognitive, socio-emotional, and moral
preparation for civic participation and engagement in post-secondary opportunities in the local,
national, and global communities.

A. THE DIVISION EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DEDP)
The Division Education Development Plan (BEDP) is anchored on the Basic Education
Development Plan (BEDEP) 2030 of the Department. The BEDEP 2030 is the medium-term
plan for DepEd covering all formal education from Kindergarten, Elementary, Junior High
School (JHS), and Senior High School (SHS), as well as the non-formal education through
the Alternative Learning System (ALS).
The BEDP 2030 is rooted in DepEd aspirations and priorities, the development agenda
of the national government, international conventions, and commitment, as well as global
trends in the educational system adapted to the local context (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2022).
As DepEd moves forward with a strategic roadmap to address the challenges of basic
education, it has prioritized actions and set a new direction for the Department through the
new education strategy dubbed MATATAG.
• MAke the curriculum relevant to produce competent and job-ready, active, and
responsible citizens.
• TAke steps to accelerate the delivery of basic education facilities and services.
• TAke good care of learners by promoting learner well-being, inclusive education, and
a positive learning environment; and
• Give support to teachers to teach better.
Consistent with the BEDEP 2030 and the MATATAG education strategy, the Zamboanga
Peninsula Regional Education Development Plan (REDP) provides the strategic goals and
direction of the regional office to address emerging issues and priority improvement areas
through four (4) major programs:
• e-APAS (Enhanced Accelerating Pupils for Access to School)

• e-PATAS (Equitable Programs Assuring Transformative and Adaptive Services)
• e-PATAAS (Elevating Performance and Aptitude of Teachers through Assessment
and Age-Based Strategies), and
• e-BANGON (Ensuring Balance, Sadaptability, and Nourishment in Gaining Optimum
Normalcy)
Intermediate Outcomes
The Division Strategic Direction as articulated in the DEDP is anchored on the four pillars of
basic education – Access, Equity, Quality and Resilience and Well-Being. It also resonates and
the critical components of MATATAG and the DepEd battlecry “Bansang Makabata. Batang
Makabansa” and ZamPen’s “Bring Them, Keep Them, Teach Them, and Protect Them.” In
order to achieve the goals of basic education, the DEDP provides the specific directions and
initiatives that will render each pillar operational with carefully designed enabling mechanisms for
governance and operations that are translated into the Division RACE:
• Reaching out to all school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults for access
to relevant basic learning opportunities.
• Allocating the best available resources according to learners’ needs.

• Capacitating teachers and instructional leaders toward child-centered instruction
anchored on curriculum standards; and
• Empowering learners to become active agents of nation-building.
The Division RACE describes what SDO Dipolog endeavors to provide learners in the
delivery of basic education services toward the achievement of the DepEd Mission, Vision and
Goal.
Figure ____. The RACE Framework
PERFORMANCE TARGETS
1. ACCESS (REACHING OUT)
The intermediate outcomes for ACCESS emphasize the need for all school-age children, out-
of-school youth, and adults to have access to basic learning opportunities. The indicators for
ACCESS are used to assess the level of participation of school-age children – learners in a
particular level of education.
1.1 NET ENROLLMENT RATE
Intermediate Outcome:
All 5-year-old children attend school.
Strategic Improve access to early childhood education through universal
Goal kindergarten.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Outcome Increased Kindergarten Net Enrollment Rate
Indicators
e-APAS 76.00% 71.36% 68.58%

R
93.47% 87.47% 83.47%
Reaching Out
All learners for the identified key stage of basic education attend school.
Strategic Improve access to learners in the key stages of the K to 12 Basic
Goal Education Program.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategies
Increased Net Enrollment Rate in the Key Stages
100.00% (ES) 94.65% (ES) 90.97% (ES)
e-APAS
Outcome 82.00% (JHS) 78.26% (JHS) 75.96% (JHS)
Indicators 45.00% (SHS) 41.77% (SHS 39.53% (SHS
100.00% (ES) 100.00% (ES) 100.00% (ES)
R
100.00% (JHS) 100.00% (JHS) 100.00% (JHS)
Reaching Out
87.51% (SHS) 81.51% (SHS) 77.51% (SHS)
1.2 COHORT SURVIVAL RATE
All enrollees at the beginning grade or year in a given school year reached the
final grade or year of the elementary or secondary level (CSR).
Strengthen the capacity of schools to ensure that enrollees at the

Strategic
beginning grade or year in a given school year reached the final grade
Goal
or year of the elementary or secondary level (CSR).
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategy
Increased Cohort Survival Rate in the Key Stages
97.00 % (ES) 93.89 % (ES) 92.04 % (ES)
e-APAS
Outcome 99.00% (JHS) 96.14% (JHS) 94.24% (JHS)
Indicators 84.00% (SHS) 81.61% (SHS) 80.00% (SHS)
97.50 % (ES) 94.78 % (ES) 94.40 % (ES)
R
99.50% (JHS) 96.64% (JHS) 94.74%(JHS)
Reaching Out
84.50% (SHS) 82.10% (SHS) 80.38% (SHS)
1.3 SCHOOL LEAVER RATE
Intermediate Outcome No. 1.4

All enrollees at the beginning grade or year level in a given school year do not
leave school during the year in the elementary or secondary level and enrolled
in the grade or year level the following school year (SLvR).
Strengthen the capacity of schools to ensure that enrollees at the
Strategic beginning grade or year level in a given school year do not leave school
Goal during the year in the elementary or secondary level and enrolled in the
grade or year level the following school year (SLvR).
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategies
Decreased School Leaver Rate in the Key Stages
2.59 % (ES) 2.76 % (ES) 2.87 % (ES)
e-APAS
Outcome 3.82 % (JHS) 4.18 % (JHS) 4.44 % (JHS)
Indicators 4.44 % (SHS) 4.58 % (SHS) 4.67 % (SHS)
0.10 % (ES) 0.13 % (ES) 0.15 % (ES)
R
3.58 % (JHS) 3.80 % (JHS) 3.96 % (JHS)
Reaching Out
3.90 % (SHS) 4.14 % (SHS) 4.31 (SHS)

1.4 RETENTION RATE
All enrollees at the beginning grade or year level in the elementary or
secondary level in a given school year continue to be in school in the
succeeding school year.
Strengthened capacity of schools to ensure that enrollees at the
beginning grade or year level in the elementary or secondary level in a
Strategy
given school year continue to be in school in the succeeding school
year.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategies
Increased Retention Rate in the Key Stages
Outcome
e-APAS
Indicators
R 98.91% (ES) 98.91% (ES) 98.91% (ES)
Reaching Out 91.12% (HS) 91.12% (HS) 91.12% (HS)
2. EQUITY (E-PATAS/ALLOCATING)
2.1 INCLUSIVE ENROLLMENT RATE
All school-age children, youth, and adult learners in disadvantaged situations
are provided inclusive basic education learning opportunities – formal and
informal, and receive appropriate equity initiatives in terms of learning
resources.
Strengthened the capacity of schools and learning centers to ensure
Strategic that school-age children, youth, and adult learners in disadvantaged
Goal situations are enrolled in appropriate inclusive education programs –
SPED, ALIVE, IPEd, and ALS.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategies
Achieve an Inclusive Enrollment Rate
5.00% (SPED) 3.00% (SPED) 2.75% (SPED)
e-PATAS 2.66% (ALIVE) 1.66% (ALIVE) 1.00% (ALIVE)
Outcome 3.58% (IPEd) 2.08% (IPEd) 1.08% (IPEd)
Indicators 0.08% (ALS) 1.58% (ALS) 2.58% (ALS)
5.48% (SPED) 4.48% (SPED) 0.48% (SPED)
A
5.63% (ALIVE) 4.63% (ALIVE) 0.63% (ALIVE)
Allocating
5.45% (IPEd) 4.45% (IPEd) 0.45% (IPEd)
Resources
0.03% (ALS) 1.23% (ALS) 2.23% (ALS)
Achieve an increase in the number of schools or
Strategies learning centers offering inclusive education
programs
30% of schools
Output offer an inclusive
e-PATAS
Indicators education
program
A 12.33% (SPED) 10.33% (SPED) 8.33% (SPED)
Allocating 16.50% (ALIVE) 14.50% (ALIVE) 12.50% (ALIVE)
Resources 37.33% (IPEd) 35.33% (IPEd) 33.33% (IPEd)

3. QUALITY (E-PATAAS/CAPACITATING)
3.1 NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST (NAT) PROFICIENCY
Teachers and instructional leaders are capacitated and provided technical
assistance toward child-centered instructions anchored on curriculum
standards
Strengthen the competence of teachers and instructional leaders along
Strategic the professional standards for teachers and school heads across career
Goal stages toward the achievement of National Achievement Test
performance indicators and targets.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Achieve an increase in the number of learners who
Strategy
reach a proficient level of mastery in the National
Achievement Test
85.00% (G3) 79.00% (G3) 75.00% (G3)
Outcome 85.00% (G6) 79.00% (G6) 75.00% (G6)
e-PATAAS
Indicators 85.00% (G10) 79.00% (G10) 75.00% (G10)
85.00% (G12) 79.00% (G12) 75.00% (G12)
85.50% (G3) 79.50% (G3) 75.50% (G3)
C 85.50% (G6) 79.50% (G6) 75.50% (G6)
Capacitating 85.50% (G10) 79.50% (G10) 75.50% (G10)
85.50% (G12) 79.50% (G12) 75.50% (G12)
3.2 PROFICIENCY IN READING AND NUMERACY SKILLS
Teachers are capacitated and provided technical assistance toward the
development of children's literacy and numeracy skills and attitudes.
Strengthen the competence of teachers to improve reading and
Strategic
numeracy skills of Kinder to Grade 3 pupils following the K to 12 Basic
Goal
Education Curriculum.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Strategy Achieve an increase in the number of school-age
learners who reach an independent reading level.
Outcome
e-PATAAS 100% 50%
Indicators
C 100% 50.50% 32.00%
Capacitating
Outcome By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Indicators Achieve an increase in the number of learners who
Strategy
reach a proficient level of mastery in numeracy
skills.
e-PATAAS 100 % 50%
C 100% 50.50%
Capacitating

3.3 COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERS THROUGH
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
Teachers and instructional leaders are capacitated and provided technical
assistance toward child-centered instructions anchored on curriculum
standards.
Strengthen the competence of instructional leaders and teachers along
Strategic
professional standards to be responsive to emergent needs and issues
Goal
and to improve learning outcomes.
Achieve an increase in the percentage of teachers
and instructional leaders – school heads and
supervisors who are capacitated to acquire
Strategy competence along professional standards and
DepEd emergent needs to support learner
achievement, through CapB, training workshops,
LAC Sessions, etc.
Output
100%
Indicators
(Supervisor)
e-PATAAS
100% (Sch Head)
100% (Teacher)
100 % (Sch 100 % (Sch 100 % (Sch
C Head) Head) Head)
Capacitating 100 % (Teacher) 100 % (Teacher) 100 %
(Teacher)
3.4 COMPLETION RATE
All Grade 1 or Grade 7 entrants graduated at the elementary or secondary
level.
Strategic Strengthened the capacity of schools to ensure that Grade 1 or Grade 7
Goal enrollees graduated from the elementary or secondary levels.
Achieve an increase in the completion rate of
Strategy
learners across key stages.
95.00% (ES) 89.71% (ES) 86.23% (ES)
Outcome e-PATAAS 98.00% (JHS) 92.43% (JHS) 88.84% (JHS)
Indicators 87.00% (SHS) 81.71% (SHS) 78.54% (SHS)
95.50% (ES) 94.39% (ES) 93.83% (ES)
C
98.50% (JHS) 92.53% (JHS) 89.34% (JHS)
Capacitating
87.50% (SHS) 82.21% (SHS) 79.04% (SHS)
4. RESILIENCY & WELLBEING (e-BANGON/EMPOWERING)
4.1 CHILD-FRIENDLY SCHOOLS
All schools are inclusive, gender-sensitive, and non-discriminating where children are
treated equally, regardless of gender, social status, cultural origin, or religious belief.
Strengthen the capacity of schools to provide an inclusive and non-
Strategic
discriminating learning environment that is safe and conducive to learning
Goal
and promotes the rights, well-being, and protection of learners.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Output
Strategy Achieve an increase in the number of schools that
Indicators
are certified Child-Friendly Schools.
100% of schools 50% of schools
are certified are certified
e-BANGON
Child-Friendly Child-Friendly
School School
100% of schools 100% of schools 72.92% of schools
E are certified are certified are certified Child-
Empowering Child-Friendly Child-Friendly Friendly School
School School
4.2 WASH IN SCHOOL (WINS) PROGRAM/ DISASTER RESPONSE, RECOVERY AND NEEDS
MECHANISM
All schools established and implemented Wash in School (WINS) Program as well as
disaster response, recovery, and needs mechanisms, in defense of the right of
children to dignity, assistance, and protection from conditions that would hamper
their development.
Strategic Strengthen the capacity of schools to establish and implement the Wash
Goal in School (WINS) Program.
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Achieve an increase in the number of schools with
WASH facilities, safe drinking water, functional
Strategy
toilets, and health facilities for waste segregation,
Output food safety, deworming, and menstrual health
Indicators management.
e-BANGON 100% of schools
E
100% of schools 100% of schools 100% of schools
Empowering
By 2028 By 2025 By 2023
Achieve an increase in the number of schools with
Strategy enabling mechanisms to locally manage their
Output response and rehabilitation and recovery needs and
Indicators intervention.
e-BANGON
E
100% of schools 100% of schools 87.5% of schools
Empowering
ENABLING MECHANISM: GOVERNANCE AND MANAGEMENT
The enabling Mechanisms determine the systems, processes, structures, and

frameworks to ensure proper coordination between and among the three (3) functional
units of the Division Office. As an organization, enabling mechanisms are defined through
governance and management which are pivotal in the implementation of various
programs, policies, projects, and activities across the (3) functional units that affect
support to the operation of the schools and learning centers. Most importantly, support
mechanisms define the necessary governance structure in terms of leadership, internal
and external stakeholders, and the partnership that will ensure the efficient and effective
delivery of basic education services. Moreover, this will sustain learning and teaching by
communicating evidence of learning progress and providing insights to teachers, school
leaders, LGU, parents, and, the learners themselves as explicitly discussed in the Basic
Education Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. Having all of these factors will create
and establish the enabling condition needed to successfully meet and achieve the targets
set specified in the performance target of every PPA.
RACE MECHANISM & STRATEGIES

R – Reaching out • Mobilize school and division personnel and
strengthen the capacity of schools to improve
performance targets.
• Improve the capacity of the Division and
schools to implement inclusive education and
special curricular programs.
• Strengthen the implementation of School-
Based Management (SBM) to ensure
transparency, boost accountability and
promote partnership
A – Allocating resources • Promote partnerships and linkages to improve
the learning environment and benefits
education for learners, especially in
MONITORING & EVALUATION
disadvantaged situations.
• Improved efficiency in the implementation of
the DepEd Partnership Data-Based System
(DPDS)
PRIME HRM
C – Capacitating personnel • Optimize Human Resource Systems to ensure

that processes are seamless and coordinated
on RSA, L&D, PM, and R&R.
• Improved competence of teaching and non-
teaching personnel through relevant
professional development programs that are
NEAP-recognized and approved to support
better learning
• Strengthen the culture of Research in schools
and the Division towards innovations that
improve learning outcomes.
E – Empowering learners • Strengthen the implementation of
mechanisms, programs, and policies in
defense of the right of children to dignity,
assistance, and protection from conditions
that would hamper their safety, health and
well-being, and development.
• Strengthen implementation of disaster risk
reduction and response as well as needs
recovery to include the implementation of the
School Contingency Plan.

IV. Performance Targets
Results Frequency
Responsible M&E
Statement / Baseline of data
Physical Target Body Strategy
Key ( 2019- Collection
Performance 2020)
Indicator
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
A. Access
Budget Execution 100%
Program
To properly Certifies
proponent,
manage the availability
budget
allocation of the of
officer,
budget from 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 200% Daily allotment
SDS,
General of all
School
Appropriation Act transaction
Bookkeepe
(GAA) and the s
rs
special allotment
received
Total NCA Cashier, regular
received and End of Every DO II, review
34 37 40 44 48 52 55 56
disbursed for the Monthly Admin. prooflist
year Aide VI from GSB
Number of 192
Schools,
Learning Centers Report on
Property
and SDO Supplies
and
provided with 192 288 288 288 288 288 288 289 Quarterly and
Supply
necessary Materials
Section
supplies, Issued
materials and
equipment
1. Number of 48 Review of
schools and Schools COT
learning centers Monitoring
that are 38 Elem 38 Elem 38 Elem 38 Elem 38 Elem 38 Elem 39 Elem Report /
monitored and 38 Elem Sch; 10 Sch; 10 Sch; 10 Sch; 10 Sch; 10 Sch; 10 Sch; 10 CID
EPS, PSDS
ensuring that K and 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 JHS, 10 End of Every Monitoring
and CID
to 12 Curriculum JHS SHS, and SHS, and SHS, and SHS, and SHS, and SHS, and SHS, and Monthly Report
Chief
and special &SHS 31 ALS 31 ALS 31 ALS 31 ALS 31 ALS 31 ALS 31 ALS (Master
curricular LC LC LC LC LC LC LC Programs,
programs are Instruction
implemented as al
Monitoring)

scheduled (PSDS
and EPS)
a. SPECIAL 131 Monitoring

PROGRAM IN learners/ tools
JOURNALISM 1 school (Master
(SPJ) - Program (ZNNHS- EPS, PSDS Program,
End of Every
Coordinators Turno) 120 125 127 129 131 133 135 136 and CID Instruction
Quarter
Chief al
Monitoring)
Review and
validation
b. Special 183
Science learners
School
Elementary /1 school 182 186 190 194 198 120 121 Year End
178 Heads,
School (SSES) (DPDS) DPDS; 20 DPDS; 40 DPDS; 60 DPDS; 80 DPDS; 82 DPDS; 84 DPDS; 84 Annually Review
DPDS EPS, PSDS
Program - ECS ECS ECS ECS ECS ECS ECS Report
,CID Chief
Program
Coordinator
c. Science 256
School Program
Technology & learners
263 269 Heads, Implement
Engineering /1
ZNNHS- ZNNHS; 275 281 287 293 299 300 Annually PSDS, ation
(STE) Program - school
Turno 20 GNHS EPS, CID Review /
Program (ZNNHS
Chief Report
Coordinator Turno)
d. Senior High 3084
School - Program learners School Program
3907 - 11 5263 - 11 5499 - 11 5617 - 11 5727 - 11 5845 - 11 5963 - 11 5964 - 11
Coordinator / 11 SHS Heads, Implement
SHS with SHS with SHS with SHS with SHS with SHS with SHS with SHS with End of
with 1 PSDS, ation
1 STEM 2 STEM 2 SHS 2 STEM 2 STEM 2 STEM 2 STEM 2 STEM Semester
STEM EPS, CID Review /
SHS SHS STEM SHS SHS SHS SHS SHS
(ZNNHS Chief Report
Turno)
e. Alternative 1616 School
Learning System larners in Heads, Review of
- Program all Focal the ALS
1394 1425 1450 1475 1,500 1525 1550 1551 Annually
Coordinator and learning person, Annual
EPSA Centers EPS, PSDS Report
,CID Chief

f. Madrasah Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES Barra ES School
Review of
Education - 35; 43; 48; 53; 58; 63; 68; 73; 73; Heads,
the
Program MECS MECS MECS MECS MECS MECS MECS MECS MECS Focal
Annually Madrasah
Coordinator 75; DPDS 87; DPDS 90; DPDS 94; DPDS 100; 105; 110; 115; 115; person,
Annual
28; ECS 34; ECS 37; ECS 40; ECS DPDS 45; DPDS 50; DPDS 55; DPDS 60; DPDS 60; EPS, PSDS
Report
50 57 60 64 ECS 70 ECS 75 ECS 80 ECS 85 ECS 86 ,CID Chief
g. SPED - SPED School
Program 175 Heads, Review of
SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED
Coordinator learners; Focal the SPED
205;DCN 215;DCN 225;DCN 230;DCN 235;DCN 240;DCN 245;DCN 245;DCN Annually
DCNHS person, Annual
HS 28 HS 30 HS 32 HS 35 HS 37 HS 39 HS 41 HS 42
13 EPS, PSDS Report
Learners ,CID Chief
h. IPED - 2989
School
Program learners
Heads, Review of
Coordinator in 14
Focal the IPEd
IPEd 2999 3059 3120 3183 3246 3310 3378 3379 Annually
person, Annual
Impleme
EPS, PSDS Report
nting
,CID Chief
Schools
i. SPA - Program 153 COT
Coordinator learners MONITORI
SPA
/1 school NG,
COORDIN
(ZNNHS INSTRUCTI
ATOR,
Main) ONAL
SCHOOL
141 143 150 160 170 180 190 191 QUARTERLY MONITORI
HEAD
NG,
,PSDS,EPS
PERFORM
and CID
ANCE
CHIEF
MONITORI
NG
2. Number of 48
Schools where schools Review and
enrollment data of the 4 Validation
are tracked. - districts PSDS, of the
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49
PSDS Annually School Monitoring
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools
Heads Report
from the
field
3. Number of 4 schools 12 14 16school 16school
10
schools offering - ALIVE; 4 schools 6 schools 8 schools schools - schools - s- s- Review and
schools - School
the following 14 - ALIVE; - ALIVE; - ALIVE; ALIVE; ALIVE; ALIVE; ALIVE; Validation
ALIVE; Heads,
programs a. schools 14 16 17 14 21 23 23 of the
19 Focal
ALIVE; IPED & IPED & 2 schools schools schools schools schools schools schools Annually Monitoring
schools person,
SPED - Program schools IPED & 2 IPED & 4 IPED & 6 IPED & IPED & IPED & IPED & Report
IPED & 8 EPS, PSDS
Coordinator SPED schools schools schools 10 12 14 14 from the
schools ,CID Chief
SPED SPED SPED schools schools schools schools field
SPED
SPED SPED SPED SPED

Number of ZNNHS-
schools who Pilot
School
integrates School 4 Big Review and
Heads ,
Comprehensive Impleme Secondar Validation
PSDSs,
Sexuality nter y Schools of the
48 48 48 50 50 51 School
Education (CSE) 5720 5720 and 4 Big Anually Monitoring
Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Coordinato
in the Basic Elementa Report
rs and
education ry from the
Focal
Curriculum - Schools field
Persons
Program
Coordinator
% of Gathered 47
data on M&E Schools,
School,
result on the and LC's
LC's, CID-
implementation (100%) 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 BEMEF-
PSDS,
of Division Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Division
Quarterly SGOD-
assessment and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's assessment
SMM&E,
program aligned (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) program
RO-QAD,
to national
CO
assessment
framework.
% of data 47
gathering on Schools,
validity, and LC's School,
authenticity, and (100%) LC's, CID- BEMEF-
47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49
utilization of the PSDS, Tools
Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools,
assessment Quarterly SGOD- utilized by
and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's
strategies and SMM&E, schools
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
tools utilized by RO-QAD, and LC's
schools, CO
classrooms and
LC's.
% of data 47
gathering on the Schools,
validity, and LC's
School, BEMEF-
authenticity, and (100%)
LC's, CID- Tracking
reliability of 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49
PSDS, learner
method of the Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools,
Quarterly SGOD- progress
assessment and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's
SMM&E, and
result for (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
RO-QAD, grading
tracking learner
CO result
progress and
grading
purposes.

% of Monitoring 47
and evaluation Schools,
on the conduct of and LC's
School,
the National, (100%)
LC's, CID-
Regional, and 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 BEMEF-
PSDS,
Division Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Conducted
Yearly SGOD-
Achievement Test and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's of NAT,
SMM&E,
to identify issues (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) RAT, DAT
RO-QAD,
and concerns
CO
arising and help
improve the
process.
Validation of 28
documents of Private
schools Schools
BEMEF-
requesting for
Private 100%
Government
28 28 28 28 28 28 28 29 School, compliance
Permit to
Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Yearly SGOD- to
Operate/Recognit
Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools SMM&E, Governmen
ion, Special
RO-QAD t Permit to
Order, Tuition
Operate
Fee Increase,
Certificate of
Good Standing.
1. Number of Annual
advocacy summit
Annual
campaigns or
SMN Implement
conducted to conferenc 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 Annually
Section ation
stakeholders to es
Review
support basic
education.
2. Sustained 11 Annual
number of Stakehol SMN Implement
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Annually
partners/ ders Section ation
stakeholders Review
3. Number of 2
approved annually Annual
proposals/ SMN Implement
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Annually
projects with Section ation
partners/ Review
stakeholders

4. Increased 80M
resource
generated from
identified donor Annual
for Adopt-a- SMN Implement
90M 100M 110M 120M 130M 140M 140M Monthly
School Program: Section ation
Brigada Eskwela, Review
Brigada Pagbasa
and others
All schools and 76 76 77 77 77 77 77 77 78

learning centers schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools
have (47 (47 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48
updated/register Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public School
ed/enrolled all Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Heads,
their learners the 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 Teacher-
LIS Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Advisers,
LIS
Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Daily LIS
monitoring
and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 Coordinato
Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- rs and
DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd Planning
School) School) School) School) School) School) School) School) School) Officer
and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31
Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning
Centers Centers Centers Centers Centers Centers Centers Centers Centers
All Public and 76 School
Private School schools Heads,
Profiles are (47 School LIS
submitted and Public 76 77 77 77 77 77 77 78
Coordinato
validated. Schools, schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools
rs, EPS
28 (47 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48 (48
incharge of
Private Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public LIS online
Inclusive
Schools Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, status of
Ed., DRRM
and 1 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 submission
Annually Coordinato
Non- Private Private Private Private Private Private Private Private and
r, Division
DepEd Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools validation
Engineer,
School) and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 and 1 monitoring
HNS, PDO-
Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non-
Youth
DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd DepEd
Formation,
School) School) School) School) School) School) School) School)
Planning
Officer and
ITO

All public schools 47 public
Report on the schools NSBI
National School Online
Building Once in
47 public 48 public 48 public 48 public 48 public 48 public 48 public 49 public Status of Submissio
Inventory are every 2
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools Submissio n of report
submitted and years
n and
validated Validation
B. Equity
1. Percentage of 0
reported errors in
the
Review of
contextualized MT, School
the
learning Heads,
Conforman
resources were 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 101 Quarterly EPSs.
ce
addressed - EPS PSDSs and
Valdiation
LR in CID Chief
Report
Coordination
with EPS
Learning Area
2. Number of 480 Review &
Quality assured Validation
EPS in all
at least one 1 per 2 per 3 per 4 per 5 per 5 per 6 per of the data
learning
Learning 1 per learning learning learning learning learning learning learning in the
areas ,
Resources (LRs) learning Area, and Area, and Area, and Area, and Area, and Area and Area and Quarterly Monitoring
PSDS and
for the use of Area grade grade grade grade grade grade grade Report/ LR
LR
schools and levels levels levels levels levels levels levels Qualty
Supervisor
Learning Centers assurance
Report
3. Number of 48
schools and schools
Review and
learning Centers
analysis of
are Provided with
School he M & E
technical
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 Heads, online
assistance on the
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools PSDS Monitoring
development,
and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 Annually andLearni survey
production,
learning learning learning learning learning learning learning learning ng every end
storage, and
centers centers centers centers centers centers centers centers supervisor of training
distribution
s and LR
utilization of
Monitoring
Learning
Tools
Materials - EPS
LR

4. Number of Printers 110 110 110 110 110 110 111 Review and
Procured (None) printers printers printers printers printers printers printers analysis of
Learning to be to be to be to be to be to be to be the
Resources for distribute distribute distribute distribute distribute distribute distribute Monitoring
Schools and d d d d d d d Report on
Learning Centers according according according according according according according LR
Printers End of the
- EPS LR to to to to to to to LRMS Distributio
(None) Year
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools n
relative relative relative relative relative relative relative submitted
enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen to CID
t t t t t t t Chief at the
populatio populatio populatio populatio populatio populatio populatio end of the
n n n n n n n year
PC 400 400
820 PC 820 PC 820 PC 821 PC
Tablets/ 820 PC Desktop Desktop
Tablets to Tablets to Tablets to Tablets to
Compute Tablets Compute Compute Monitoring
115 PC be be be be
rs (None) distribute rs to be rs to be Report on
Tablets distribute distribute distribute distribute
d distribute distribute LR
distribute d d d d
according d d Distributio
d to according according according according
to according according End of the n
schools to to to to LRMS
schools to to Year submitted
according schools schools schools schools
relative schools schools to CID
to relative relative relative relative
enrolmen relative relative Chief at the
priority of enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen enrolmen
t enrolmen enrolmen end of the
needs t t t t
populatio t t year
populatio populatio populatio populatio
n populatio populatio
n n n n
n n
8 8
modules modules Monitoring
per per Report on
None None None None None None None
subject subject LR
(Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft
per per Distributio
copies copies copies copies copies copies copies
quarter quarter End of the n
are are are are are are are LRMS
were were Year submitted
available available available available available available available
printed printed to CID
in online in online in online in online in online in online in online
and and Chief at the
drive) drive) drive) drive) drive) drive) drive)
distribute distribute end of the
d to d to year
learners learners

100% 47
Implementation Schools,
of quality and LC's
assurance (100%)
processes on:
School Planning,
School Based
Management
BEMEF-
(SBM), School School,
47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 Implement
Governace CID,
Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, ation of
Council (SGC), Quarterly SGOD,
and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's Programs
Basic Education RO-QAD,
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) and
Monitoring and CO
Projects
Evaluation
Framework
(BEMEF) and
Implementation
of Programs and
Projects as basis
for Continous
Improvement
1. Number of None
SMN
Action Research Annual
Section
on factors Implement
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 Annually with
contributing to ation
Research
successful Review
Section
participation
1. Number of 48 Annual
schools provided schools/ SMN Implement
48 48 48 48 48 48 49 Annually
with technical campus Section ation
assistance Review
3 schools Annual
SMN Implement
2 2 3 3 4 4 5 Annually
Section ation
Review
2. Number of 48
school heads/ schools/
focal persons campus Annual
Activity Activity
oriented/ SMN Implement
48 48 48 48 48 Documen Documen Annually
capacitated on Section ation
taion taion
school's local and Review
international
partnerships
3. Number of 47 Annual
organized school schools Implement
47 48 48 48 48 48 49 Annually SMN
PTA and ation
Review

Teacher's
Association
Education 100% of
Statistics and Division
100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of
perfornance Educatio
Division Division Division Division Division Division Division Division
reports prepared n
Educatio Educatio Educatio Educatio Educatio Educatio Educatio Educatio
as inputs to the Statistics
n n n n n n n n
division?s and
Statistics Statistics Statistics Statistics Statistics Statistics Statistics Statistics
strategic Performa
and and and and and and and and
education plan nce Planning Submissio
Performa Performa Performa Performa Performa Performa Performa Performa Annually
(Division Reports Officer n of reports
nce nce nce nce nce nce nce nce
Education 2019-
Reports Reports Reports Reports Reports Reports Reports Reports
Development 2020
2021- 2022- 2023- 2024- 2025- 2026- 2027- 2027-
Plan) and prepared
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028
operation plan
submitte submitte submitte submitte submitte submitte submitte submitte
(Annual
d d d d d d d d
Implementation
Plan)
Assisted in the AIP 2019
preparation of
the final draft of
the Annual
Planning
Implementation Review and
Officer,
Plan (AIP) and if needed,
AIP 2022 AIP 2023 AIP 2024 AIP 2025 AIP 2026 AIP 2027 AIP 2028 AIP 2029 Annually Division
subsequent correction
Planning
adjustments of reports
Team
based on the
output of the
Division Planning
Team
Physical Plan 2019 Planning
(BAR1) for the Physical Officer,
current fiscal Plan Budget
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
year prepared Officer, Submissio
Physical Physical Physical Physical Physical Physical Physical Physical Annually
and submitted to Schools n of reports
Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan
DBM and DepEd Division
RIX Superinten
dent
Quarterly FY2019
Planning
Physical Reports QRPO
Officer,
of Operation
FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2028 Schools Submissio
(QPRO) prepared Quarterly
QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO Division n of reports
and submitted to
Superinten
DBM and DepED
dent
RIX

Mid-Year/Year 1 Mid-
End Program Year/1
Implementation Year-End 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 2 Mid-
Review (Physical) Program Year/1 Year/1 Year/1 Year/1 Year/1 Year/1 Year/1 Year/1
Report prepared Impleme Year-End Year-End Year-End Year-End Year-End Year-End Year-End Year-End Planning
Submissio
and submitted to ntation Program Program Program Program Program Program Program Program Officer,
n and
DBM and DepED Review Impleme Impleme Impleme Impleme Impleme Impleme Impleme Impleme Budget
presentatio
RIX Report ntation ntation ntation ntation ntation ntation ntation ntation Officer,
Semestral n of report
(Jan- Review Review Review Review Review Review Review Review Schools
before the
June, Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Division
DBM
2019/Jul (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- (Jan- Superinten
panelist
y- June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul June/Jul dent
Dec2019) y- y- y- y- y- y- y- y-
Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022) Dec2022)
C. Quality
Quality Assured Check and
Manual of review
Operation guidelines,
policies,
forms, and
processes
of
Personnel
Section
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% AOIV
Submit to
QA for
review and
control
Provide
copy to
Personnel
Staff for
references
Supervised daily
maintenance of 1.Prepare
an effective flow memorand
of As soon as um for SDS
communications All Records approval
Records
throughout the section 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% issued an re:
Section
department and units Annual submission
monitors Inventory of
progress of Inventory
systematic of Records
filingof

documents
monthly.
1. Number of 48 review and

review and
Schools with schools validation
validation
Reading of the 4 of school
of school
Programs/Numb districts consolidate
consolidate
er of Schools d reports
d reports
Participated in on reading,
on reading,
the SDO Reading field
field
Programs monitoring
monitoring
(Program of learners'
of learners'
Coordinators) reading
reading
progress in
progress in
schools,
schools,
online
online
monitoring
monitoring
of school-
of school-
initiated
initiated
BOSY and reading
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 reading
3rd quarter activities
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools activities
of the SY and and
and school
school
compliance
compliance
to
to
CO/RO/S
CO/RO/SD
DO-
O-
mandated
mandated
programs
programs
and
and
activities,
activities,
feedbackin
feedbackin
g from
g from
reading
reading
coordinato
coordinator
rs and
s and
school
school
heads
heads

2.Number of CID 2 M&E
Proposed online
trainings under Monitoring
HRTD Funds CID survey
with NEAP Education every end
Recognition Supervisor of training/
End of the
Certificates 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 s, Program Classroom
Year
(Program Proponents Observatio
Coordinator/Own and CID n Tool/
er) Chief Student
feedbackin
g ( Survey
or FGD)
3. Number of 2 school M&E
school heads and heads online
teachers who Monitoring
participated in survey
the upskilling of HRTD, every end
240 240 240 240 240 240 241
Inclusive 4th Quarter Program of training/
48 school Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers
Education and of every Proponent Classroom
heads (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers
special curricular school year and CID Observatio
school) school) school) school) school) school) school)
programs Chief n Tool/
implementation Student
(Program feedbackin
Coordinators) g ( Survey
or FGD)
4. Number of 48
schools with schools
validated 1. of the 4
Master class districts Review and
program (PSDS) validation
PSDS,
2. quarterly 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 Annualy/Qu of the
School
assesment (PSDS schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools arterly School
Heads
and EPS) 3. Data
Number of LAC Report
session
Conducted (PSDS
and EPS)
5. Number of 48
Verified Reports schools
Review and
On: 1. financial of the 4
validation
management 2. districts PSDS,
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 of the
resource Annualy School
schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools School
management 3. Heads
Data
school
Report
management and
operation (PSDS)

6. Number of 48 Review and
Schools schools validation
PSDS,
conducted of the 4 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 of the
Annualy School
rewards and districts schools schools schools schools schools schools schools schools School
Heads
recognition Data
(PSDS and EPS) Report
7. Number of 48
Teachers who Teachers M&E
participated in from 48 online
the updates on schools Monitoring
48 144 192 240 288 336 384 385 Annually LRMS
the Access of (one each survey
Learning school) every end
Materials in LR of training
Portal (EPS LR)
8. Number of 48
trained school Teachers
M&E
librarians, digital from 48
online
illustrators and schools
Monitoring
writers for the (one each 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 337 Annually LRMS
survey
production of school)
every end
digital learning
of training
resources. (EPS
LR)
9. Number of 48
schools and schools
learning centers
provided with
Technical
M&E
Assistance on the
online
development,
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 Monitoring
production, Annually LRMS
Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools survey
storage,
every end
distribution and
of training
utilization of
Learning
resources were
provided. (EPS
LR)
10. Number of 48
Teachers Teachers 48
M&E
Provided with (one per School
online
Technical school) LR
Monitoring
Assistance on the Coordina 96 144 192 240 288 336 337 Annually LRMS
survey
registration and tors (1
every end
access of DepEd per
of training
LR Portal. (EPS school)
LR)

% of School 47 Public
report Validated Schools,
on the School and LC's
Achievement and (100%) Schools,
47 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 49 Public BEMEF-
Learning CID,
Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Periodic
Outcome by Quarterly SGOD,
and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's test
gathering data RO-QAD,
(100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) conducted
utilizing CO
prescribed
approach and
methods.
% of Gathered 47 Public
data as basis for Schools,
M&E report on and LC's
the performance (100%)
of the Schools
Division along:
Technical
Assisstance to
schools and 47 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 49 Public School, BEMEF-
Learning Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, CID, LRMDS
Quarterly
Centers, and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's SGOD, LM's
Equitable (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) RO-QAD Distributed
Distribution of
educational
resources to
schools and LCs
and submit
reports to be able
to identify areas
for improvement
% of data 47 Public
gathered and Schools,
prepare and LC's
report/document (100%)
School,
s on best 47 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 48 Public 49 Public
CID,
practices with Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, BEMEF-
Quarterly SGOD,
regard school and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's PIR
RO-QAD,
management and (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
CO
governance for
sharing and
benchmarking
purposes.
1. Number of None Annual
SMN
Action Research Implement
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 Annually Section
on factors ation
with
contributing to Review

successful Research
participation Section
All LIS correction 100% of

requests are all LIS 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of 100% of
Planning
given technical correctio all LIS all LIS all LIS all LIS all LIS all LIS all LIS all LIS
Officer, LIS
assistance n correctio correctio correctio correctio correctio correctio correctio correctio
Coordinato LIS
requests n n n n n n n n Daily
rs and Dashboard
are given requests requests requests requests requests requests requests requests
School
TA are given are given are given are given are given are given are given are given
Heads
TA TA TA TA TA TA TA TA
Percentage/Num 47
ber of schools HR Schools 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 All Tallied
March-April
Strategic Plans Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Personnel TNAs
and Policies
Percentage/Num 47 Tallied and
ber of Schools Rank
Professional and Competenc
47 48 48 48 48 48 48 49 March to SEPS and
Career y
Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools Schools May EPS HRD
Development Developme
nt Needs of
Personnel
Percentage/Num 15
ber of HR Training 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 Identified
CID Chief,
Trainings Trainings Trainings Trainings Trainings Trainings Trainings Trainings Training
Development providers 10 EPS,
conducte conducte conducte conducte conducte conducte conducte conducte Year-round providers,
Interventions and SEPS and
d in a d in a d in a d in a d in a d in a d in a d in a Resource
Resource EPS HRD
Speakers year year year year year year year year Speakers
Percentage/Num 3
ber of Training 20 30 4 50 60 70 80 81 Data on no.
Scholarship and Institutio scholars scholars scholars scholars scholars scholars scholars scholars of Scholars
SEPS and
Professional ns under under under under under under under under Year-round availed the
EPS HRD
Program various various various various various various various various program on
Coordination programs programs programs program programs programs programs programs scholarship
Percentage/Num 2 Reports Consolidate

ber of Training 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 2 Mid- SEPS, EPS d Trainings
Mid-Yearand
and Development Year and Year and Year and Year and Year and Year and Year and Year and HRD and conducted
Annual
Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual QATAME with
Report
Report Report Report Report Report Report Report Report In-charge QATAME
Results

Percentage/Num Pool of
ber of Succession Employee
and Exit s for Updated Updated Updated Updated Updated Updated Updated Updated
Promotio Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Updated
n Employee Employee Employee Employee Employee Employee Employee Employee Pool of
s for s for s for s for s for s for s for s for Employees
Promotio Promotio Promotio Promotio Promotio Promotio Promotio Promotio SEPS, EPS as to
n in n in n in n in n in n in n in n in HRD, AO Teaching,
Year-round
Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, IV Teaching
Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Non- Personnel Related
Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, Teaching, and Non-
Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching Teaching
Related Related Related Related Related Related Related Related Positions
Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions Positions
Percentage/Num Rewards
ber of Employee and
1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity
Welfare Recogniti
on on on on on on on on
on, Pre-
Rewards Rewards Rewards Rewards Rewards Rewards Rewards Rewards Conducted
Retireme SEPS, EPS
and and and and and and and and Pre-
nt HRD,
Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Recogniti Retirement,
Program, Once a year PRAISE
on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- on, Pre- SC, PWD,
PWD, SC Chairman,
Retireme Retireme Retireme Retireme Retireme Retireme Retireme Retireme PRAISE
Program GAD Focal
nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD nt, PWD Program
and SC and SC and SC and SC and SC and SC and SC and SC
Program Program Program Program Program Program Program Program

Part V: Implementation Arrangement and Organizational Capacity
This section presents the projects, programs, and activities (PPAs)

implementation arrangement and organizational capacity. This shows how SDO-
Dipolog City’s potential has marshaled its human, financial, and other resources to
effect positive change in the internal and external stakeholders its serves.
Organizational capacity is impacted by a number of factors, including leadership, the
organization’s stage of development, and changes in the environment, to name a few.
Organizations engage in capacity-building activities to increase their effectiveness in
serving their constituencies. Such activities include, but are not limited to, hiring new
employees to meet increased demand for services; strategic planning to position
themselves for changes in the environment; training board and staff on their roles
and responsibilities, or automating financial systems.
Each functional unit has assessed and evaluated the PPAs of the previous
DEDP in the realization of the performance targets as the basis of understanding
some factors that affect their implementation. There was thorough interfacing
between and among the functional units in the Division Office to determine the
dynamic of each of the PPA and how this will become a driving force to realize the
target set. Moreover, as part of the whole perspective, the context of the organization
has been taken into consideration because understanding capacity is critical. After
all, a shift within an organization happens.
In addition, being the PRIME-HRM Bronze Awardee and having implemented

the Quality Management System (QMS), SDO-Dipolog City become nimble and
leadership has been paying close attention and being adaptive. It is also apparent in
the crafting of the DEDP that run for six years and for being the trailblazer that the
top management has learned to create a culture and systems that encourage people
to focus “on the business” rather than always working “in the business.” It is far too
easy to become entrenched in the day-to-day activity and neglect to step back and
look at the larger vision of what the business needs to thrive. This is part of the
change of management in the QMS implementation.

I. PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT
Curriculum Implementation Division
Results Baselin Means Frequ Respons M &

Statement/ e (SY of ency ible E
Physical Targets Verific of Body Strat
Key 2019-
Performance 2020) ation Data egy
Colle
Indicator 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 ction
Make the curriculum relevant to produce competent and job-ready, active and responsible citizen.
Take good care of learners by promoting learner well-being, inclusive education and a positive
learning environment
A. Access ( REACHING out to school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults for access to
basic learning opportunities) E-APAS
I. Instructional Management
1. Number of 38 38 38 38 38 38 Review
schools and 38 Elem Elem Elem Elem Elem Elem of COT
learning Elem Sch; Sch; Sch; Sch; Sch; Sch; EPS, Monitori
Monthly End of
centers that and 10 10 10 10 10 10 PSDS ng
48 Report Every
are monitored 10 JHS, JHS, JHS, JHS, JHS, JHS, and Report /
Schools of the Monthl
and ensuring JHS 10 10 10 10 10 10 CID CID
CID y
that K to 12 &SH SHS, SHS, SHS, SHS, SHS, SHS, Chief Monitori
Curriculum S and and and and and and ng
and special 31 31 31 31 31 31 Report

curricular ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS ALS (Master
programs are LC LC LC LC LC LC Program
implemented s,
as scheduled Instructi
(PSDS and onal
EPS) Monitori
ng)
Monitoring
a. SPECIAL
tools
PROGRAM IN 131 Quarter (Master
JOURNALISM learner EPS,
ly Program,
(SPJ) - s/ 1 End of PSDS
Reports Instruction
Program school 120 125 127 129 131 133 135 Every and
on al
Coordinators (ZNNH Quarter CID
assessm Monitoring
S- ent Chief ) Review
Turno) and
validation
b. Special
183 School
Science 182 186 190 194 198 120
learners Year Heads,
Elementary 178 DPDS DPDS; DPDS; DPDS; DPDS; DPDS Annual
/1 End EPS,
School (SSES) DPDS ; 20 40 60 80 82 ; 84 ly Year
school Report PSDS
Program - ECS ECS ECS ECS ECS ECS End
(DPDS) ,CID
Program Review
Chief
Coordinator Report
c. Science
256
Technology & 263 269 School
learners
Engineering ZNN ZNNH Year Heads, Program
/1 Annual
(STE) HS- S; 20 275 281 287 293 299 End PSDS, Implement
school ly
Program - Turn GNH Report EPS, CID ation
(ZNNHS
Program o S Chief Review /
Turno)
Coordinator Report

d. Senior 3084
High School - learne
Program rs / 3907 5263
Semestr School
Coordinator 11 - 11 - 11 5963
al and End of Heads,
SHS SHS SHS 5499 - 5617 5727 - 5845 - 11
Year Semest PSDS,
with 1 with with 11 - 11 11 - 11 SHS Program
End er EPS, CID
STEM 1 2 SHS SHS SHS SHS with Impleme
Report Chief
(ZNNH STE STE with 2 with 2 with 2 with 2 2 ntation
S M M SHS STEM STEM STEM STEM Review
Turno) SHS SHS STEM SHS SHS SHS SHS / Report
captu captu captu captu
captu captu
res res captur res res
res res
90% 95% es 100% 100%
100% 100%
of of 100% of of
of of
learne learn of learne learne
learne learne
161 rs ers learne rs rs
rs rs
6 who who rs who who
who who
lear do do who do do Annual
do not do not
ner not not do not not not ly
have have
s in have have have have have School
acces acces
e. Alternative all acces acces access acces acces Heads,
s to s to
Learning lear s to s to to s to s to Focal
forma forma
System - nin forma forma formal forma forma person, Review of
l l
Program g l l educa l l Year EPS, the ALS
educa educa
Coordinator Cen educa educa tion educa educa End PSDS ,CID Annual
tion tion
and EPSA ters tion tion tion tion Report Chief Report
Barra Barra Barra Barra Barra Barra Barra Barra Review of
f. Madrasah ES 35; ES ES ES 53; ES 58; ES 63; ES 68; ES School the
Annual
Education - MECS 43; 48; MECS MECS MECS MECS 73; Year Heads, Madrasah
ly
Program 75; MECS MECS 94; 100; 105; 110; MECS End Focal Annual
Coordinator DPDS 87; 90; DPDS DPDS DPDS DPDS 115; Report person, Report

28; ECS DPDS DPDS 40; 45; 50; 55; DPDS EPS, PSDS
50 34; 37; ECS ECS ECS ECS 60; ,CID Chief
ECS ECS 64 70 75 80 ECS
57 60 85
SP
ED
17
5
lear
ner
s; Annual
DC ly
NH School
S Heads,
13 SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED Focal Review of
g. SPED - Lea 205;D 215;D 225;D 230;D 235;D 240;D 245;D Year person, the SPED
Program rne CNHS CNHS CNHS CNHS CNHS CNHS CNHS End EPS, PSDS Annual
Coordinator rs 28 30 32 35 37 39 41 Report ,CID Chief Report
2989
School
learners
Heads, Review of
in 14 Year
Annual Focal the IPEd
IPEd 2999 3059 3120 3183 3246 3310 3378 End
ly person, Annual
h. IPED - Impleme Report
EPS, PSDS Report
Program nting
,CID Chief
Coordinator Schools
153 QUART SPA COT
learners ERLY COORDIN MONITOR
/1 REPOR QUART ATOR, ING,
i. SPA - school TS ON ERLY SCHOOL INSTRUC
Program (ZNNHS ASSESS HEAD TIONAL
Coordinator Main) 141 143 150 160 170 180 190 MENT ,PSDS,EP MONITOR

AND S and CID ING,
QUARE CHIEF PERFOR
RLY MANCE
RECITA MONITOR
L. ING
2. Number of Review
Schools and
where LIS
48 Validatio
enrollment 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Enrol PSDS,
schools Annual n of the
data are schoo schoo school school school school schoo ment School
of the 4 ly Monitorin
tracked. - ls ls s s s s ls Repor Heads
districts g Report
PSDS t
from the
field
4 4 6 8 12
school schoo schoo school 10 school 14 16sch
s- ls - ls - s- school s - school ools - Review
School
3. Number of ALIVE ALIVE ALIVE ALIVE s - ALIVE s - ALIVE and
Heads,
schools ; 14 ; 14 ; 16 ; 17 ALIVE; ; 14 ALIVE; ; 23 LIS Validation
Focal
offering the school schoo schoo school 19 school 21 schoo Enrolm Annual of the
person,
following s ls ls s school s school ls ent ly Monitorin
EPS,
programs a. IPED IPED IPED IPED s IPED IPED s IPED IPED Report g Report
PSDS
ALIVE; IPED &2 &2 &4 &6 &8 & 10 & 12 & 14 from the
,CID Chief
& SPED - school schoo schoo school school school school schoo field
Program s ls ls s s s s ls
Coordinator SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED SPED
Take steps to accelerate delivery of basic education facilities and
services
B. Equity ( (ALLOCATING the best available resources according to learners needs) E-
PATAS

II. Development & Evaluation of Instructional Materials
1. Percentage
of reported
errors in the
MT,
contextualize
Reports School
d learning
on Heads,
resources Quarte
0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 conform EPSs.
were rly Review of
ance PSDSs
addressed - the
review and CID
EPS LR in Conforma
Chief
Coordination nce
with EPS Valdiation
Learning Area Report
2. Number of
Quality Review &
assured at 1 per 2 per 3 per 4 per 5 per 5 per EPS in all Validation
LRMDS
least one learni learni learni learni learni learni learning of the
1 per Report
Learning ng ng ng ng ng ng areas , data in
learni of Quarte
Resources 480 Area, Area, Area, Area, Area, Area PSDS and the
ng Qualty rly
(LRs) for the and and and and and and LR Monitorin
Area assured
use of grade grade grade grade grade grade Superviso g Report/
LM
schools and levels levels levels levels levels levels r LR Qualty
Learning assurance
Centers Report
3. Number of LRMDS School
48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Review
schools and NEAP Heads,
schoo schoo school school school school schoo and
learning Approve PSDS
48 ls and ls and s and s and s and s and ls and Annual analysis
Centers are d andLearni
schools 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 ly of he M &
Provided with Trainin ng
learni learni learni learni learni learni learni E online
technical g supervisor
ng ng ng ng ng ng ng Monitorin
assistance on Proposa s

the center center center center center center center l and g survey
development, s s s s s s s end of every end
production, Trainin of
storage, and g training
distribution Complet and LR
utilization of ion Monitorin
Learning Reprot g Tools
Materials for
learning
opportunity
4. Number of 110 110
Procured printe 110 110 printe
Learning rs to printe 110 printe 110 rs to
Resources be rs to printer rs to printer be Review
for Schools distri be s to be be s to be distri and
and Learning buted distrib distrib distrib distrib buted analysis
Centers - EPS accor uted uted uted uted accor of the
Printe
LR ding accord accord accord accord ding End of Monitorin
Printers rs LRMS
to ing to ing to ing to ing to to the LRMS g Report
(None) (None Report
schoo school school school school schoo Year on LR
)
ls s s s s ls Distributi
relativ relativ relativ relativ relativ relativ on
e e e e e e submitted
enrol enrol enrolm enrol enrol enrol to CID
ment ment ent ment ment ment Chief at
popul popul popula popul popula popul the end of
ation ation tion ation tion ation the year
PC 115 820 820 400 400 820 820 End of Monitorin

PC PC PC Deskto Deskt PC PC LRMS g Report
Tablets/ the LRMS
Tablet Tablet Tablet p op Tablet Tablet Report on LR
Comput Year
s s s to be Comp Comp s to be s to Distributi

ers distri distri distrib uters uters distrib be on
(None) buted buted uted to be to be uted distri submitted
to accor accord distrib distrib accord buted to CID
schoo ding ing to uted uted ing to accor Chief at
ls to school accord accord school ding the end of
accor schoo s ing to ing to s to the year
ding ls relativ school school relativ schoo
to relativ e s s e ls
priorit e enrol relativ relativ enrol relativ
y of enrol ment e e ment e
needs ment popul enrolm enrol popula enrol
popul ation ent ment tion ment
ation popula popul popul
tion ation ation
8
modu
les
per
8 subje
modules ct per
per quart Monitorin
End of
subject er LRMS g Report
the LRMS
per were None None None None None None Report on LR
Year
quarter printe (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft (Soft Distributi
were d and copies copies copies copies copies copies on
printed distri are are are are are are submitted
and buted availa availa availa availa availa availa to CID
distribu to ble in ble in ble in ble in ble in ble in Chief at
ted to learne online online online online online online the end of
learners rs drive) drive) drive) drive) drive) drive) the year
Give support to teachers to teach better

C. Quality (CAPACITATING teachers and instructional leaders toward child-centered instruction anchored on curriculum
standards) E-PATAAS
-School review and
review
Data validation
and
Reports of school
validation
(Phil-IRI consolidat
of school
Pretest ed reports
consolidat
and on
ed reports
Posttest reading,
on
1. Number of Results) field
reading,
Schools with Reading monitorin
field
Reading Progra g of
monitorin
Programs/Nu m learners'
g of
mber of Accomp reading
learners'
Schools lishmen progress
48 reading
Participated 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 t Report in schools,
schools progress
in the SDO schoo schoo school school school school schoo online
of the 4 in
Reading ls ls s s s s ls monitorin
districts schools,
Programs g of
online
(Program school-
monitorin
Coordinators) initiated
g of
to achieve KPI reading
school-
for NAT, RAT activities
initiated
and DAT and
reading
school
activities
BOSY complianc
and and
and e to
school
3rd CO/RO/S
complianc
quarter DO-
e to
of the mandated
CO/RO/S
SY programs

and DO-
activities, mandated
feedbacki programs
ng from and
reading activities,
coordinato feedbacki
rs and ng from
school reading
heads coordinat
ors and
school
heads
-
Reading
Progra
m
Accomp
lishmen Annual
t Report ly
-
Learner
s'
Reading
Progres Monthl
s y
Monitor
ing
Report
2.Number of Certific End of CID M&E
CID 2 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 ate of the Education online
Proposed NEAP Year Supervisor Monitori

trainings Recogni s, ng
under HRTD tion Program survey
Funds with Proponent every
NEAP s and CID end of
Recognition Chief training/
Certificates Classroo
(Program m
Coordinator Observat
/Owner) ion Tool/
Student
feedback
ing (
Survey
or FGD)
M&E
3. Number of online
school heads Monitori
and teachers ng
who survey
participated every
240 240 240 240 240 4th
in the 240 Trainin HRTD, end of
2 47 Teach Teach Teach Teach Teach Quarte
upskilling of Teache g Program training/
schoo schoo ers (5 ers (5 ers (5 ers (5 ers (5 r of
Inclusive rs (5 Narrati Proponent Classroo
l l pers pers pers pers pers every
Education pers ve and CID m
heads heads schoo school school school schoo school
and special school) report Chief Observat
l) ) ) ) l) year
curricular ion Tool/
programs Student
implementati feedback
on (Program ing (
Coordinators) Survey
or FGD)

1.
Master
Class
1.
Progra
Maste 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1.
m(a
r Maste Master Master Master Master Maste
4. Number of week
class r class class class class class r class
schools with before Review
progr progra progra progra progra progra progra
validated 1. the and
am m (47) m (47) m (47) m (47) m (47) m (47)
Master class openin validatio
(47) 2. 2. 2. 2. 2. 2.
program g n of the
2. LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC LAC
(PSDS) and Classe School
LAC sessio sessio sessio sessio sessio sessio
LAC session s) 2. Data
sessio n n n n n n
Plan (PSDS LAC Report
n Cond Condu Condu Condu Condu Condu
and EPS) Sessio
Cond ucted cted cted cted cted cted
n end
ucted (470) (470) (470) (470) (470) (470)
47 of
(470)
schools School every PSDS,
of the 4 Data Quarte School
districts Report r Heads
5. Number of
Verified
Reports On: 1. Review
financial and
management validation
2. resource of the
management School
3. school 48 Data
management schools 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 School PSDS, Report
and operation of the 4 schoo schoo school school school school school Data Annual School
(PSDS) 4. LAC districts ls ls s s s s s Report y Heads

session
Conducted
6. Number of Review
Schools and
48
conducted validation
schools
rewards and of the
of the 4
recognition 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 School PSDS, School
districts
(PSDS and school schoo school school school school school Data Annual School Data
EPS) s ls s s s s s Report y Heads Report
7. Number of
Teachers who 48
Teachers M&E
participated online
in the from
48 Monitorin
updates on g survey
the Access of schools
(one every end
Learning of
Materials in each Training Ann
school) training
LR Portal Narrativ uall
(EPS LR) 48 144 192 240 288 336 384 e report y LRMS
8. Percentage
of trained
48
school M&E
Teachers
librarians, online
from
digital Monitorin
48
illustrators g survey
schools
and writers every end
(one
for the of
each
production of Training training
school)
digital Narrativ Annual
learning 48 96 144 192 240 288 336 e report ly LRMS

resources.
(EPS LR)
9. Number of
schools and
learning
centers
provided with
Technical
Assistance on
M&E
the
online
development,
Monitorin
production,
g survey
storage,
every end
distribution
of training
and
utilization of
Learning Trainin
resources g
were 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Narrati
provided. 48 Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo ve Annual
(EPS LR) schools ls ls s s s s ls report ly LRMS
10. Number 48
of Teachers Schoo
M&E
Provided with l LR
online
Technical Coord
Monitorin
Assistance on inator Trainin
g survey
the 48 s (1 g
every end
registration Teachers per Narrati
of training
and access to (one per schoo ve Annual
DepEd LR school) l) 96 144 192 240 288 336 report ly LRMS

Portal. (EPS
LR)
III. Assessment of Learning
1. Percentage
of Teachers
48
and School 48 48 48 48
school 48
Heads school school school school
48 heads school
provided with heads heads heads heads
school (Grad heads
Technical (Grade (Grade (Grade (Grade
heads e (Grade
Assistance ( 3= 3=45% 3= 3=47% Test
(Grad 3=43 3=86
Review of 44%;G ; 46%; ; Question
e 6= %, %;Gra School
TOS) in the 48 rade Grade Grade Grade s Face
42%; Grade de 6= NAT Quarte Heads,
effective School 6= 6= 6= 6= and
Grade 6= 88%; Result rly EPS ,
management Heads 44%; 45%; 46%; 47%; Content
10 = 43%; Grade PSDS
of Learning Grade Grade Grade Grade Validatio
18%; Grade 10 =
Assessment to 10 = 10 = 10 = 10 = n
Grade 10 = 88%;
achive KPI in 20%; 21%; 22%; 22%;
12 = 19%; Grade
the NAT, DAT Grade Grade Grade Grade
25% Grade 12 =
and RAT 12 = 12 = 12 = 12 =
12 = 64%
(PSDS and 27% 28% 29% 30%
26%
EPS) as
evidence
2. Percentage MT,
90% 92% 93% 95% of 98% 100% 4 Data
of schools School
of the of the of the the of the of the quart submitt Interview
with Learning 3 out of Heads,
learni learni learni learni learni learni ers ed to Quarte /Peer and
Performance 4 EPSs.
ng ng ng ng ng ng Learn CID rly Superior
Results quarters PSDSs
areas areas areas areas areas areas ing Supervi Validation
(Subject Area and CID
in all in all in all in all in all in all Asses sors
Mean Scores) Chief

are analyzed grade grade grade grade grade grade sment
for possible levels' levels' levels' levels' levels' levels' Resul
interventions Learn Learn Learni Learni Learni Learni ts
(PSDS and ing ing ng ng ng ng
EPS) Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor
manc manc mance mance mance mance
es are es are s are s are s are s are
analy analy analyz analyz analyz analyz
zed zed ed for ed for ed for ed for
for for possib possib possib possib
possi possi le le le le
ble ble interv interve interv interve
interv interv ention ntions ention ntions
entio entio s s
ns ns
48
schoo
(Grad (Grad (Grad l
(Grade (Grade (Grade
e e e heads
3=65% 3=70 3=75%
3=50 3=55 3=60 (Grad
, %, ,
%, %, %, e Data
Grade Grade Grade
Grade Grade Grade 3=86 submit
6= 6= 6= Quarte
6= 6= 6= %;Gra ted to
70%; 75%; 80%; rly
55%; 60%; 65%; de 6= CID
Grade Grade Grade
3. Percentage Grade Grade Grade 88%; Superv
10 = 10 = 10 =
of learners 10 = 10 = 10 = Grade isors
70%; 75%; 85%;
who reach 55%; 60%; 65%; 10 =
Grade Grade Grade
the Nearly Grade Grade Grade 88%;
12 = 12 = 12 =
Proficient 12 = 12 = 12 = Grade
70%) 75%) 85%)
Level ( 50% to 55% 60%) 65%) 12 =
74 % MPS) None 85%

* NAT Target is based on the 2023 NEP commitment
SCHOOL GOVERNANCE AND OPERATIONS DIVISION

Key 2019-
Colle
Indicator 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 ction
School Management, Monitoring and Evaluation
47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submitt Quarter BEMEF-
% of Gathered 47 School,
Schoo Scho Schoo School Schoo Schoo Schoo ed ly Division
data on M&E Schools LC's,
ls, ols, ls, s, and ls, ls, ls, report assessmen
result on the , and CID-
and and and LC's and and and on the t program
implementatio LC's PSDS,
LC's LC's LC's (100%) LC's LC's LC's conduct
n of Division (100%) SGOD-
(100 (100 (100% (100 (100 (100% ed
assessment SMM&
%) %) ) %) %) ) monitor
program E, RO-
ing,
aligned to QAD,
evaluati
national CO
on, and
assessment
analysis
framework.
of tool
gathere
d data
on the
implem
entation
of

Division
assessm
ent
program
alignme
nt to
national
assessm
ent
framew
ork with
100%
accurac
y.
47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submis Quarte BEMEF-
% of data Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo sion of rly School, Tools
gathering on and ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, report LC's, utilized
validity, LC's and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and on the CID- by
authenticity, (100%) LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's conduct PSDS, schools
and (100 (100 ) ) (100% ed SGOD- and LC's
utilization of %) %) ) monitor SMM&E,
the ing, RO-QAD,
assessment evaluati CO
strategies and on, and
tools utilized analysis
by schools, of tool
classrooms gathere
and LC's. d data
on the
validity,
authetic

ity, and
utilizati
on of
the
assessm
ent
strategi
es and
tools
utilized
by
schools,
classroo
ms and
LC's
with
100%
accurac
y.
% of data 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 Submis Quarte School, BEMEF-
48
gathering on Schools, Scho Schoo Schoo School Schoo Schoo sion of rly LC's, CID- Tracking
Schoo
the validity, and LC's ols, ls, ls, s, and ls, ls, report PSDS, learner
ls,
authenticity, (100%) and and and LC's and and on the SGOD- progress
and
and reliability LC's LC's LC's (100% LC's LC's conduct SMM&E, and
LC's
of method of (100 (100 (100% ) (100% (100% ed RO-QAD, grading
(100
the %) %) ) ) ) monitor CO result
%)
assessment ing,
result for evaluati
tracking on, and
learner analysis
progress and of tool

grading gathere
purposes. d data
on
validity,
authent
icity,
and
reliabilit
y of
method
of the
assessm
ent
result
for
tracking
learner
progres
s and
grading
purpose
s with
100%
accurac
y.
% of 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Yearly School, BEMEF-
Submis
Monitoring School Scho Scho School Schoo Schoo Schoo Schoo LC's, CID- Conduct
sion of
and s, and ols, ols, s, and ls, ls, ls, ls, PSDS, ed of
report
evaluation on LC's and and LC's and and and and SGOD- NAT,
on the
the conduct (100% LC's LC's (100% LC's LC's LC's LC's SMM&E, RAT,
conduct
of the ) ) DAT
ed

National, (100 (100 (100% (100% (100% (100 monitor RO-QAD,
Regional, and %) %) ) ) ) %) ing, CO
Division evaluati
Achievement on, and
Test to analysis
identify of tool
issues and gathere
concerns d data
arising and on the
help improve conduct
the process. of the
national
,
regional
, and
division
assess
ment
test to
identify
issues
and
concern
s
arising
and
help
improve
the
process
with

100%
accurac
y.
Validation of 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 100% Yearly Private BEMEF-
documents of Priv Privat Privat Privat Privat Privat Privat Privat or 28 School, 100%
schools ate e e e e e e e out of SGOD- complianc
requesting for Sch Schoo Schoo School Schoo Schoo Schoo Schoo 28 SMM&E, e to
Government ools ls ls s ls ls ls ls validat RO-QAD Governme
Permit to ed nt Permit
Operate/Recog docum to Operate
nition, Special ents of
Order, Tuition school
Fee Increase, applic
Certificate of ants
Good reques
Standing. ting
permit
to
operat
e to
RO
Pillar No. 2 Equity
100% 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submis Quarte School, BEMEF-

Implementatio Sch Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo sion of rly CID, Implement
n of quality ool ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, reports SGOD, ation of

assurance s, and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and on RO-QAD, Programs
processes on: an LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's finding CO and
School d (100 (100 ) ) (100% s of all Projects
Planning, LC' %) %) ) schools
School Based s in
Management (10 school
(SBM), School 0%) plannin
Governance g, SBM,
Council SGC,
(SGC), Basic BEMEF
Education , and
Monitoring implem
and entatio
Evaluation n of
Framework PAP's
(BEMEF) and as
Implementatio basis
n of Programs for
and Projects Contin
as basis for ous
Continous Improv
Improvement ement
Pillar No. 3 Quality
% of School 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submis Quarte Schools, BEMEF-

report Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public sion of rly CID, Periodic
Validated on Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo validate SGOD, test
the School and ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, d RO-QAD, conducte
Achievement LC's and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and reports CO d
and Learning (100%) LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's on
Outcome by (100 (100 ) ) (100% School
gathering data %) %) ) Achieve

utilizing ments
prescribed and
approach and Learnin
methods. g
outcome
s
through
eSRC of
all
schools
to RO
47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Subm Quarte School, BEMEF-
% of Gathered
Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public ission rly CID, LRMDS
data as basis
Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo of SGOD, LM's
for M&E
and ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, gather RO-QAD Distribut
report on the
LC's and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and ed ed
performance
(100%) LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's data
of the Schools
(100 (100 ) ) (100% as
Division
%) %) ) basis
along:
for
Technical
M&E
Assistance to
report
schools and
on the
Learning
perfor
Centers,
manc
Equitable
e of
Distribution
the
of educational
Schoo
resources to
ls
schools and
Divisi
LCs and
on
submit

reports to be along:
able to TA to
identify areas school
for s and
improvement LC's,
equita
ble
distri
butio
n of
educa
tional
resou
rces
to
school
s and
LCs to
identi
ty
areas
for CI
% of data
Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public ission rly CID, PIR
gathered and
Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo of SGOD,
prepare
and ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, report RO-QAD,
report/docum
LC's and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and on CO
ents on best
(100%) LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's best
practices with
(100 (100 ) ) (100% practi
regard school
%) %) ) ces of
management
school
and

governance mana
for sharing geme
and nt
benchmarkin and
g purposes. gover
nance
for
shari
ng
and
bench
marki
ng
purpo
ses.
Pillar No. 4 Resiliency

% of
Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public ission rly SDO- Assessme
Implementing
Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School Schoo of SMM&E,R nt
a process for
and ls, ls, s, and s, and s, and s, and ls, report O-QAD, conducte
monitoring
LC's and and LC's LC's LC's LC's and on the CO-BEA d
and
(100%) LC's LC's (100% (100%) (100% (100%) LC's condu
evaluating the
(100 (100 ) ) (100% ct and
organization
%) %) ) result
effectiveness
of
of the schools
asses
division office
sment
test/
gather
ed
data

with
100%
accur
acy
on or
before
the
15th
of
Janua
ry in
every
school
year.
Social Mobilization and Networking
I. Resourcing
1. Number of Annua 1 1 2 2 3 3 Activity Annual SMN Annual

advocacy l Docume ly Section Implement
campaigns summ ntation, ation
conducted to it or Signed Review
stakeholders confer MOA,
to support ences MOU,
basic DOD/D
education. OA, SIF
2. Sustained 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 Profile Annual SMN Annual
number of Stake of ly Section Implement
partners/ holder Stakeho ation
stakeholders s lders Review

3. Number of 2 2 3 4 5 6 7 Approve Annual SMN Annual
approved annua d ly Section Implement
proposals/ lly proposa ation
projects with ls, Review
partners/ Signed
stakeholders MOA,
MOU,
DOD/D
OA, SIF
4. Increased 80M 90M 100M 110M 120M 130M 140M DPDS Monthl SMN Annual
resource System y Section Implement
generated Generat ation
from ed Review
identified Summa
donor for ry of
Adopt-a- Resourc
School es
Program:
Brigada
Eskwela,
Brigada
Pagbasa and
others
II. Sustained Partnership
1. Number of Once 2 2 3 3 4 4 Write Semi- SMN Annual

write ups/ per Ups/ Annual Section Implement
reports year Reports ation
submitted to Review
stakeholders

2. Number of Once 2 3 4 5 6 7 Montior Quater SMN Annual
schools per ing ly Section Implement
monitored year Report wih ation
with SMME Review
programs Section
and projects
3. Number of 2 2 2 3 3 4 4 Activity Semi- SMN Annual
turn over annua Docume Annual Section Implement
ceremony lly ntation, ation
conducted/ DOD/D Review
launched OA
4. Number of 50 50 55 60 65 70 75 Annuall Annual SMN Annual
Major and stakeh y ly Section Implement
Minor olders ation
Stakeholders Review
recognized
III. Research and Development
1. Number of None 1 1 2 2 3 3 Annuall Annual SMN Annual

Action y ly Section Implement
Research on with ation
factors Research Review
contributing Section
to successful
participation
IV. Technical Assistance
1. Number of 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Docume Annual SMN Annual

schools school ntation ly Section Implement
provided with s/ (AR and ation
technical camp Photos) Review
assistance us

3 2 2 3 3 4 4 Approve Annual SMN Annual
school d ly Section Implement
s Proposa ation
l Review
2. Number of 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Activity Annual SMN Annual
school school Docume ly Section Implement
heads/ focal s/ ntation ation
persons camp Review
oriented/ us
capacitated
on school's
local and
international
partnerships
3. Number of 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 List of Annual SMN Annual
organized school elected ly Implement
school PTA s School ation
and PTA Review
Teacher's Officers
Association and
Teacher
's
Associat
ion
Research and Planning
I. Plans and Budget (Equity)
Education 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Approve Annual Planning Submissio
Statistics of of of of of of of of d ly Officer n of
and Divisio Divisi Divisi Divisi Divisio Divisi Divisio Divisi Statistic reports
perfornance n on on on n on n on

reports Educa Educ Educ Educa Educa Educa Educa Educ al
prepared as tion ation ation tion tion tion tion ation Report
inputs to the Statist Statis Statis Statist Statist Statist Statist Statis
division’s ics tics tics ics ics ics ics tics
strategic and and and and and and and and
education Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor Perfor
plan mance manc manc mance mance mance mance manc
(Division Report e e Report Report Report Report e
Education s Repor Repor s s s s Repor
Development 2019- ts ts 2023- 2024- 2025- 2026- ts
Plan) and 2020 2021- 2022- 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027-
operation prepar 2022 2023 submi submi submi submi 2028
plan (Annual ed subm subm tted tted tted tted submi
Implementati itted itted tted
on Plan)
Assisted in AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP AIP Plan per Annual Planning Review
the 2019 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Functio ly Officer, and if
preparation nal Division needed,
of the final Division Planning correction
draft of the and Team of reports
Annual their
Implementati corresp
on Plan (AIP) onding
and sections
subsequent
adjustments
based on the
output of the
Division
Planning
Team

Physical Plan 2019 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Approve Annual Planning Submissio
(BAR1) for Physic Physi Physi Physic Physic Physic Physic Physi d and ly Officer, n of
the current al cal cal al al Plan al al Plan cal signed Budget reports
fiscal year Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan Plan copy of Officer,
prepared and the Schools
submitted to report Division
DBM and Superinte
DepEd RIX ndent
Quarterly FY201 FY20 FY20 FY202 FY202 FY202 FY202 FY20 Approve Quarte Planning Submissio
Physical 9 22 23 4 5 6 7 28 d and rly Officer, n of
Reports of QRPO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO QPRO signed Schools reports
Operation copy of Division
(QPRO) the Superinte
prepared and report ndent
submitted to
DBM and
DepEd RIX
Mid- 1 Mid- 1 1 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Approve Semest Planning Submissio
Year/Year Year/ Mid- Mid- Year/ Year/1 Year/ Year/ Mid- d and ral Officer, n and
End Program 1 Year/ Year/ 1 Year- 1 1 Year/ signed Budget presentati
Implementati Year- 1 1 Year- End Year- Year- 1 copy of Officer, on of
on Review End Year- Year- End Progra End End Year- the Schools report
(Physical) Progra End End Progra m Progra Progra End report Division before the
Report m Progr Progr m Imple m m Progr Superinte DBM
prepared and Imple am am Imple menta Imple Imple am ndent panelist
submitted to menta Imple Imple menta tion menta menta Imple
DBM and tion ment ment tion Review tion tion menta
DepEd RIX Revie ation ation Revie Report Revie Review tion
w Revie Revie w (Jan- w Report Revie
Report w w Report June/ Report (Jan- w
(Jan- Repor Repor (Jan- July- (Jan- June/ Repor

June, t t June/ Dec20 June/ July- t
2019/ (Jan- (Jan- July- 22) July- Dec20 (Jan-
July- June June Dec20 Dec20 22) June/
Dec20 /July /July 22) 22) July-
19) - - Dec20
Dec2 Dec2 22)
022) 022)
Technical assistance in the conduct of research
Completed 17 21 25 30 36 43 51 61 BERF Annual Research

Annual
researches Liquidat ly Unit,
Program
ion
Report
Technical assistance in the preparation of the strategic and operational work plans of schools and learning centers
Completed 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Copies Trienni Research

Triennial
SIPs of ally Unit,
Program
submitt
Review
ed and
complet
ed SIPS
Planning frame, systems and plans
Completed Copies Planning Sexennial

DEDP, AIP 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 of Sexenn and Program
complet ially for Research Review;
ed DEDP; Section; Annual
DEDP, Annual All SDO Program
AIP ly for Functiona Review
AIP l Units
Basic Education Information report generation

Basic 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 Copies Planning Sexennia
education of Sexenn and l,
reports reports ially Research Triennial
generated generat (DEDP) Section , and
ed for ; Annual
use in Annual Program
DEDP, ly Reviews
AIP, (AIP);
SIPs; Trienni
BERF ally
report (SIP);
Annual
ly
II. Basic Education Information System (e-BEIS) Maintenance and Report Generation (Access)
All schools 77 LIS

and learning 76 76 77 77 77 77 77 school LIS Daily School monitorin
centers have schools schoo schoo school school school school s (48 Online Heads, g
updated/regis (47 ls (47 ls (48 s (48 s (48 s (48 s (48 Public Status Teacher-
tered/enrolled Public Public Public Public Public Public Public School of Advisers,
all their Schools, Schoo Schoo School School School School s, 28 Partici LIS
learners the 28 ls, 28 ls, 28 s, 28 s, 28 s, 28 s, 28 Privat pation Coordinat
LIS Private Privat Privat Privat Private Privat Private e ors and
Schools e e e School e School School Planning
and 1 Schoo Schoo School s and School s and s and Officer
Non- ls and ls and s and 1 Non- s and 1 Non- 1
DepEd 1 1 1 DepEd 1 DepEd Non-
School) Non- Non- Non- School Non- School DepE
and 31 DepE DepE DepE ) and DepEd ) and d
Learnin d d d 31 School 31 School
g Schoo Schoo School Learni ) and Learni ) and
Centers l) and l) and ) and ng 31 ng 31

31 31 31 Center Learni Center Learni
Learn Learn Learni s ng s ng
ing ing ng Center Center
Cente Cente Center s s
rs rs s
All Public and 76 76 77 LIS Annual LIS online
Private schools school 77 77 77 77 77 school Dashb ly School status of
School (47 s (47 schoo school school school school s (48 oard Heads, submissio
Profiles are Public Public ls (48 s (48 s (48 s (48 s (48 Public School LIS n and
submitted Schools, Schoo Public Public Public Public Public School Coordinato validation
and 28 ls, 28 Schoo School School School School s, 28 rs, EPS monitorin
validated. Private Privat ls, 28 s, 28 s, 28 s, 28 s, 28 Privat incharge of g
Schools e Privat Privat Private Privat Private e Inclusive
and 1 Schoo e e School e School School Ed., DRRM
Non- ls and Schoo School s and School s and s and Coordinato
DepEd 1 ls and s and 1 Non- s and 1 Non- 1 r, Division
School) Non- 1 1 DepEd 1 DepEd Non- Engineer,
DepE Non- Non- School Non- School DepE HNS, PDO-
d DepE DepE ) DepEd ) d Youth
Schoo d d School School Formation,
l) Schoo School ) ) Planning
l) ) Officer and
ITO
47 48 48 48 48 48 48 NSBI NSBI Submissi
All public 47 Onc
public public public public public public public Dashbo Online on of
schools public e in
schools schoo school school school school schoo ard Status report
Report on the schoo ever
ls s s s s ls of
National ls y2 Submiss
School yea ion and
Building rs Validati
Inventory are
on

submitted
and validated
Completed 17 21 25 30 36 43 51 61 BERF Annual Researc Annual

researches Liquida ly h Unit, Program
tion PRS
Report
III. Capacity Building (Quality)
All Public and 76 76 77 77 77 77 77 77 Attenda Annual School M&E

Private Public Public Public Public Public Public Public Public nce ly Heads, LIS online
Schools and and and and and and and and Sheets, Coordinato Monitori
Heads, LIS Private Privat Privat Private Private Private Private Privat Certifica rs, ng
Coordinators, Schools e e School School School School e te of Planning survey
and ALS Heads, Schoo Schoo s s s s School Appeara Officer, every
District 75 LIS ls ls Heads, Heads, Heads, Heads, s nce, and ITO end of
Coordinatos Coordin Heads Heads 77 LIS 77 LIS 77 LIS 77 LIS Heads and training
and ALS ators, , 76 , 77 Coordi Coordi Coordi Coordi , 77 Certifica
Mobile and 4 LIS LIS nators nators, nators, nators, LIS te of
Teachers are ALS Coordi Coordi , and and 4 and 4 and 4 Coordi Particip
oriented and District nators nators 4 ALS ALS ALS ALS nators ation
updated iin Coordin , and , and Distric Distric Distric Distric , and
the LIS ators 4 ALS 4 ALS t t t t 4 ALS
implementatio and 16 Distri Distri Coordi Coordi Coordi Coordi Distric
n in the ALS ct ct nators nators nators nators t
current school Mobile Coordi Coordi and 16 and 16 and 16 and 16 Coordi
year. Teachers nators nators ALS ALS ALS ALS nators
and and Mobile Mobile Mobile Mobile and
16 16 Teache Teache Teache Teache 16
ALS ALS rs rs rs rs ALS
Mobile Mobile Mobile

Teach Teach Teach
ers ers ers
All public Attenda Division M&E
47 48 48 48 Once
schools are nce Engineer, online
public public public public in
oriented in Sheets, Planning Monitoring
schools schoo school school every 2
the Certific Officer, survey
ls s s years
implementatio ate of School every end
n of the Appear Heads, of training
National ance, Property
School and Custodian
Building Certific s, and LIS
Inventory ate of Coordinat
Particip ors
ation
Yearly School M&E
All public and 76 76 77 767sc 77 77 77 77 Attend
Heads, online
private schools schoo schoo hools school school school schoo ance
LIS Monitorin
schools are (47 ls (47 ls (48 (478P s (48 s (48 s (48 ls (48 Sheets, Coordinat g survey
oriented on Public Public Public ublic Public Public Public Public Certific
ors, every end
the collection Schools, Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ate of
Planning of
of 28 ls, 28 ls, 28 ls, 28 s, 28 s, 28 s, 28 ls, 28 Appear
Officer, training
data/informat Private Privat Privat Privat Private Privat Private Privat ance,
and ITO
ion Schools e e e School e School e and
requirements and 1 Schoo Schoo Schoo s and School s and Schoo Certific
in the Basic Non- ls and ls and ls and 1 Non- s and 1 Non- ls and ate of
Education DepEd 1 1 1 DepEd 1 DepEd 1 Partici
Information School) Non- Non- Non- School Non- School Non- pation
System DepE DepE DepE ) DepEd ) DepE
through the d d d School d
unified data Schoo Schoo Schoo ) Schoo
gathering l) l) l) l)
forms for the

current
School Year
IV. Technical Assistance Technical Assistance (Quality)
Daily Planning LIS

All LIS 100% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Reques Officer, Dashboar
correction all LIS of all of all of all of all of all of all of all t logs
LIS d
requests are correcti LIS LIS LIS LIS LIS LIS LIS in the
Coordinat
given on correc correc correc correct correc correct correc LIS
ors and
technical requests tion tion tion ion tion ion tion facility
School
assistance are reque reque reque reques reques reques reque
Heads
given TA sts sts sts ts are ts are ts are sts
are are are given given given are
given given given TA TA TA given
TA TA TA TA
Annua Research Annual

Completed 17 21 25 30 36 43 51 61 BERF lly Unit, PRS Program
researches Liquida
tion
Report
Human Resource Development
Pillar 3: Quality
March All Tallied

Percentage/N 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submi -April Personnel TNAs
umber of Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ssion
schools HR ls ls ls s s s ls of
Strategic OPCRF
Plans and /IPCRF
Policies Part IV

March SEPS and Tallied
Percentage/N 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submi
to May EPS HRD and Rank
umber of Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ssion Competen
Professional ls ls ls s s s ls of
cy
and Career OPCRF
Developm
Development /IPCRF ent Needs
Part IV
of
Personnel
Year- CID Chief, Identified
Percentage/N 15 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 No. of round 10 EPS, Training
umber of HR Training Traini Traini Traini Traini Traini Traini Traini Trainin
SEPS and providers,
Development provider ngs ngs ngs ngs ngs ngs ngs gs EPS HRD Resource
Interventions s and condu condu condu condu condu condu condu conduc
Speakers
Resourc cted cted cted cted in cted cted in cted ted by
e in a in a in a a year in a a year in a SDO
Speaker year year year year year
s
Year- SEPS and Data on
Percentage/N 3 20 30 4 50 60 70 80 No. of
round EPS HRD no. of
umber of Training schol schol schola schola schola schola schol scholar
Scholars
Scholarship Instituti ars ars rs rs rs rs ars s availed
and ons under under under under under under under officiall
the
Professional vario vario variou variou variou variou variou y
program
Program us us s s s s s enrolle
on
Coordination progr progr progra progra progra progra progr d in
scholarsh
ams ams ms m ms ms ams various ip
progra
ms
Mid- SEPS, Consolida
Percentage/N 2 1 1 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Mid- 1 Come Yearan EPS HRD ted
umber of Reports Mid- Mid- Year Year Year Year Mid- up
d and Trainings
Training and Year Year and and and and Year withMi Annua conducte
Development and and Annu Annua Annua Annua and d-year

Annu Annu al l l l Annu and l QATAME d with
al al Report Report Report Report al Annual Report In-charge QATAME
Repor Repor Repor Trainin Results
t t t g
report
as to
the no.
of
trainin
gs
conduc
ted
and its
feedba
ck
Year- SEPS, Updated
Percentage/N Pool of Updat Updat Updat Updat Updat Updat Updat No. of round EPS HRD, Pool of
umber of Employe ed ed ed ed ed ed ed vacant AO IV Employee
Succession es for Pool Pool Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool of Pool positio
Personnel s as to
and Exit Promoti of of Emplo Emplo Emplo Emplo of ns due
Teaching,
on Empl Empl yees yees yees yees Empl to Teaching
oyees oyees for for for for oyees promot
Related
for for Promo Promo Promo Promo for ion,
and Non-
Prom Prom tion in tion in tion in tion in Prom retirem
Teaching
otion otion Teachi Teachi Teachi Teachi otion ent,
Positions
in in ng, ng, ng, ng, in transfe
Teach Teach Non- Non- Non- Non- Teach r,
ing, ing, Teachi Teachi Teachi Teachi ing, death
Non- Non- ng, ng, ng, ng, Non- and
Teach Teach Teachi Teachi Teachi Teachi Teach newly
ing, ing, ng ng ng ng ing, created
Teach Teach Relate Relate Relate Relate Teach

ing ing d d d d ing positio
Relate Relate Positio Positio Positio Positio Relate ns
d d ns ns ns ns d
Positi Positi Positi
ons ons ons
Once a SEPS, Conducte
Percentage/N Rewards 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 At
year EPS HRD, d Pre-
umber of and Activi Activi Activit Activit Activit Activit Activit least PRAISE Retireme
Employee Recognit ty on ty on y on y on y on y on y on conduc
Chairman, nt, SC,
Welfare ion, Pre- Rewar Rewar Rewar Rewar Rewar Rewar Rewar ted 1
GAD Focal PWD,
Retirem ds ds ds ds and ds ds and ds Progra
PRAISE
ent and and and Recog and Recog and m
Program
Program Recog Recog Recog nition, Recog nition, Recog annual
, PWD, nition nition nition, Pre- nition, Pre- nition ly
SC , Pre- , Pre- Pre- Retire Pre- Retire , Pre-
Program Retire Retire Retire ment, Retire ment, Retire
ment, ment, ment, PWD ment, PWD ment,
PWD PWD PWD and PWD and PWD
and and and SC and SC and
SC SC SC Progra SC Progra SC
Progr Progr Progra m Progra m Progr
am am m m am
Educational Facility
I. Site Inspection
Year DepEd SGOD

1. All schools 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Printed
Round Project Monitorin
and learning Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo NSBI,
Engineer, g Tools
centers are ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and School
Division (EFD
monitored to LC LC LC LC LC LC LC Site Engineer, Assessme
have a Develo
EPS- nt /

physical pment SGOD, Validation
environment Plans, and SGOD Form,
that is School Chief School
conducive to Site Site
effective Owner Appraisal
teaching, ship Form)
learning and and
working by other
ensuring school
access to docum
adequate, ents
structurally which
and physically can be
safe use
buildings, during
grounds and the site
facilities ocular
according to inspect
the ion
requirements
and
standards of
an education
and work
facility that is
environmental
ly
sustainable,
hazard free,
gender
sensitive

and friendly
to people with
disability.
II. BAC Procurement Activities
Every TWG Must

1. Examine None Submit Procur Members follow
the accuracy ted
ement (For Infra) and base
of the technic
on the
technical al
Guideline
documents to docum s of
determine the ents
Republic
lowest bidder Act No.
by calculating (R.A.)
the amount of 9184
bids using the otherwise
program of known as
works and the
specifications. “Governm
ent
Procurem
ent
Reform
Act” and
its
checklist
from the
Revised
Implemen
ting Rules
and

Regulatio
ns
Every TWG Agreemen
2. Conduct None Approv Project Members t must be
pre ed Imple (For Infra), agreed
construction Progra mentat Concern and
conference to m of
ion School written
all the Works, Head with down
contractors Plans
School with the
and school and
Facilities two (2)
heads to iron Specifi
Coordinat parties;
out problems cations
or, and the end-
that may arise Contracto user and
in the r the
implementatio contracto
n stage. r.
All DepEd Actual
3. Provide None 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit School Project ocular
Technical Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted Project Engineer, inspectio
Assistance to ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request Imple Division n
the School LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from
mentat Engineer,
Heads in the School ion EPS-
procurement Heads
SGOD,
process of and SGOD
School Based Chief
Repair and
Maintenance
Scheme
(SBRMS) by
providing
sample of
Program of

Works as
guide in the
implementatio
n.
All DepEd Periodic
4. Conduct None 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Approv School Project inspectio
monitoring on Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ed
Project Engineer, n and
the ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and Progra Imple Division monitorin
implementatio LC LC LC LC LC LC LC m of
mentat Engineer, g
n of the Works,
ion EPS-
SBRMS to Plans
SGOD,
recipient and
SGOD
schools Specifi Chief, and
through cations
Concern
ocular School
inspection. Heads
with
School
Facilities
Coordinat
ors
III. Construction
Every TWG Agreemen

1. Conduct None Approv
Project Members t must be
“Pre- ed Imple (For Infra), agreed
Construction Progra
mentat Concern and
Conference m of ion School written
Orientation” Works,
Head with down
with School Plans
School with the
Heads and and
Facilities two (2)
Contractors.

Specifi Coordinat parties;
cations or, and the end-
Contracto user and
r the
contracto
r.
Every TWG Testing
2. Conduct None Approv Project Members Results of
testing of ed
Imple (For Infra), the
delivered Progra
mentat Concern delivered
materials to m of ion School materials
check for Works,
Head with in order
adherence to Plans School to check
standards and
Facilities the
and report to Specifi
Coordinat adherenc
concerned cations or, and e to
parties to take Contracto standards
corrective r /
action as specificati
needed. ons
Every TWG Accomplis
3. Assess on a None Submit Project Members hment
periodic basis ted Imple (For Infra), reports
the progress progres
mentat Concern must be
of s ion School evaluated
construction accom
Heads periodical
work and plishm with ly on site
report to ent
School in order
concerned reports
Facilities to have
parties to take from Coordinat an
corrective the
ors, accurate
action as

needed to contrac Contracto project
ensure tor r status for
adherence to reporting.
program of
works, quality
standards,
and time
schedule for
completion.
Every TWG Observed
4. Conduct None Approv Project Members constructi
ocular ed
Imple (For Infra), on
inspection of Progra mentat Concern activities
construction m of ion School which
sites to assess Works,
Heads needs
compliance to Plans with improvem
safety and
School ent &
standards Specifi Facilities rectificati
and report to cations
Coordinat on must
concerned ors, not be
parties to take Contracto instructe
corrective r d orally
action as but be
needed. written
down in
the
logbook of
the
contracto
r in order
for them

to make
necessary
actions.
IV. Facilities Repair
Every DepEd Conduct

1. Check and None 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit Project Project actual
review the Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted
Imple Engineer, ocular
school ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request mentat Division inspectio
prepared LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from
ion Engineer, n in order
Program of School EPS- to assess
Works for Heads
SGOD, and
minor with
and SGOD evaluate
facilities corresp Chief the
repair and to onding
submitted
guide the POWs Program
activities and and
of Works
procurement attach
(POWs).
of materials ments
and labor.
Every DepEd Conduct
2. Guide the None 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit Project Project actual
procurement Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted Imple Engineer, ocular
of materials ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request mentat Division inspectio
and labor for LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from
ion Engineer, n in order
the repair School EPS- to assess
work to Heads
SGOD, and
ensure and SGOD evaluate
adherence to Chief the
cost and procurem
quality ent of
requirements. materials

and labor
for the
repair
works to
ensure
adherenc
e of the
cost and
quality
requireme
nts as to
approved
POW.
Every DepEd Conduct
3. Evaluate None 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit
Project Project actual
the repair Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted Imple Engineer, ocular
work made ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request mentat Division inspectio
and LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from ion Engineer, n in order
recommend School
EPS- to assess
payment upon Heads
SGOD, and
completion of and SGOD evaluate
work Chief the
according to complete
work and cost ness of
specifications. the repair
works to
ensure
adherenc
e of the
cost and
quality

requireme
nts as to
approved
POW,
plans and
specificati
ons.
V. Final Inspection
Every TWG During

1. Conduct None Submit Project Members the ocular
punchlist to ted Imple (For Infra) inspectio
projects with letter
mentat n, listing
95% status of request ion of all
accomplishme of the
Punchlist
nt for contrac ed Items
rectification tor for
which
so that the
needs
defects can be conduc
Corrective
corrected t of
Works are
before issuing punchl
written
the Certificate isting
down in
of Completion Annex
and Turn done in
Over. order for
the
contracto
r to have
a guide in
their
completio
n of the

specific
project.
Every TWG Accomplis
2. Issue None Punchl Project Members hment of
“Certificate of isted Imple (For Infra) the
Completion Items mentat and Punchlist
and for
ion Contracto ed
Acceptance” Correct r Corrective
on ive
Works are
construction Works
the only
projects that basis for
are finished COC/CO
and meet A
quality issuances
standards. .
VI. Demolition and Condemnation of Education Building
Year DepEd Actual

1. Appraise None Submit
Round Project ocular
buildings ted Engineer, inspectio
identified for request
Division n
demolition s from
Engineer,
and School EPS-
recommend Heads
SGOD,
demolition of and SGOD
such by Chief
submitting a
“Building
Inspection
Report”.

Year DepEd Actual
2. Monitor the None Submit
demolition ted Engineer, inspectio
work and request
Division n
ensure s from
Engineer,
adherence to School EPS-
safety Heads
SGOD,
standards by and SGOD
workers. Chief
Year DepEd Actual
3. Prepare None Submit
and submit ted Engineer, inspectio
demolition request
Division n
documents to s from
Engineer,
the SDS School
EPS-
Office and Heads
SGOD,
keep a copy in and SGOD
file for future Chief
reference.
VII. School Mapping and Inventory of School Buildings and Educational Facilities
Year DepEd Actual

1. Coordinate 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit Round Project ocular
the drafting of Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted
Engineer, inspectio
School and ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request Division n
Vicinity Maps LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from
Engineer,
with technical School
EPS-
staff and Heads
SGOD,
check for and SGOD
accuracy to Chief
serve as
reference for

school
improvement
plans.
Year DepEd Actual
2. 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit
Consolidated Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted
Engineer, inspectio
data on ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request
Division n
school LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from Engineer,
inspection School
EPS-
gathered from Heads
SGOD,
site and SGOD
inspections Chief
and ensure
accurate
encoding into
the education
data
information
system.
Year DepEd Actual
3. Gather 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit Round Project ocular
updated data Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted
Engineer, inspectio
as requested ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and request
Division n
for planning LC LC LC LC LC LC LC s from
Engineer,
and School EPS-
implementatio Heads
SGOD,
n purposes. and SGOD
Chief
Year DepEd Actual
4. Identify 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 Submit Round Project ocular
needs of Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo ted
Engineer, inspectio
schools with request
Division n

regard ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and s from Engineer,
facilities and LC LC LC LC LC LC LC School EPS-
input into the Heads SGOD,
technical and SGOD
assistance Chief
plans of the
SDO technical
assistance
teams.
VIII. Preservation of Heritage Buildings
Year DepEd Actual

1. Conduct None Submit
appraisal and ted Engineer, inspectio
create an request
Division n
inventory of s from Engineer,
Heritage School
EPS-
Buildings Heads
SGOD,
through and SGOD
actual Chief
inspection to
determine the
status of
structure for
preservation
and required
intervention
of the Central
Office
for budgeting
purposes.

IX. Files and Records
Year DepEd Constant

1. Create and 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 As Round Project Validation
maintain a Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo reflecte
Engineer, of NSBI
databank of ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and d in Division (Updating
all LC LC LC LC LC LC LC the
Engineer, ) *reflect
constructed, Nation
EPS- reported
repaired, al SGOD, repaired
demolished, School
and SGOD classroom
preserved Buildin
Chief s/buildin
buildings for g
gs *check
inventory Invento
if
purposes and ry reported
compiling all (NSBI -
demolishe
bidding Online)
d
documents, buildings
program of is
works, deducted
inspection from
reports, deed previous
of donations, report
Titles
Certificate of
Completion
and
Acceptance of
projects
implemented.
Year DepEd Constant
2. Maintain 47 47 48 48 48 48 48 48 As
Round Project Validation
data on Schools Schoo Schoo Schoo School School School Schoo reflecte
Engineer, of NSBI

educational ls and ls and ls and s and s and s and ls and d in Division (Updating
facilities for LC LC LC LC LC LC LC the Engineer, )
DRRMC Nation EPS-
reference. al SGOD,
School and SGOD
Buildin Chief
g
Invento
ry
(NSBI -
Online)
Year DepEd Updating
3. Maintain None Copies Round Project of files
copies of of
Engineer,
POW, POW,
Division
inspection inspect Engineer,
reports and ion
EPS-
Bidding reports SGOD,
Documents of and
and SGOD
all DepEd Biddin
Chief
projects. g
Docum
ents of
all
DepEd
project
s
Year DepEd Updating
4. Maintain None Copies Round Project of files
duplicate of Deed
Engineer,
copies of Deed of
Division
of Donations, Donati
Engineer,

Acceptance of ons, EPS-
Educational Accept SGOD,
Facilities and ance of and SGOD
other such Educat Chief
documents ional
needed for Faciliti
reference in es and
future other
building and such
construction docum
and repair ents
projects. needed
as
referen
ce
Youth Formation
Youth Formation Program Management And Implementation
SPG/SSG, Mandated
Election of Mandated PPAs
Supreme Youth
Pupil Formation
Government 15 PPAs from
(SPG)/Supre days CO and
me Student after RO are
Government the conducted
(SSG), 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 condu and
Electio
schools ct of implement
n
Youth for ed. KID
Report
Environment

in Schools- electio and YES
Org n O
Teachers-
(YES-O) and Advisers
Barkada
Kontra Droga
(BKD) are
facilitated/co
nducted
Provision of
technical Youth Monitorin
assistance to Formation g Tools
schools on 20 25 25 30 30 30 35 35 Monito Year Coordinat
schools ring Round ors
Youth
Tool
Formation
Program-
related PPAs.
Capacity Building
Every Youth Evaluatio

Capacity 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 Activity
after Formation n Form
Building/Advo activitie Report activit Coordinat
cacy activities s
y ors
to teacher-
advisers/yout
h formation
coordinators,
and students
on skills
development,
leadership and

other relevant
youth
formation
programs are
conducted
End of Youth Photos /
Recognition to 6 6 6 6 10 10 10 10 Medals
School Formation Videos
schools for schools / Year Coordinat
student Certific
ors
government pr ate
ogram
implementatio
n is initiated
Monitoring And Evaluation
Year Youth Monitorin

Implementatio 10 15 15 20 20 30 30 30 Monito
Round Formation g Tool
n of youth schools ring Coordinat
formation Tool
ors
programs to
schools is
monitored to
ensure quality
standard
compliance.
DISASTER RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT
Risk-Informed Plans, Policies and Standards
Annua School DRRM
Percentage of 39 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 School l Planning Form 05
schools with schools schoo schoo school school school school schoo Improv
Team; CSS
DRRM-related with ls ls s with s with s with s with ls ement
Division
existing with with existin existin existin existin with

plans, policies and existi existi g g g g existi Plan or SMME; Monitorin
and/or updated ng ng DRRM DRRM DRRM DRRM ng Annual Division g Tool
standards DRRM DRR DRR Plans Plans Plans Plans DRR Improv DRRM
Plans M M M ement Coordinat
Plans Plans Plans Plan or
Partnerships for Strengthening Resilience
Annua SGOD DRRM
Percentage of 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Divisio l Chief; Form 05
schools with schools schoo schoo school school school school schoo n
Division CSS
established with ls ls s s s s ls Memor DRRM Monitorin
regular DRRM andum
Coordinat g Tool
coordination Coordin
or
mechanism, ation &
database, and Informat
protocol for ion
organizing, Manage
sharing and ment
tracking Protocol
information, s
resources,
expertise and
best practices
among
external and
internal
partners
DRRM Information System (DRRMIS) and Research
Annua Division Form 2

Percentage of 6 Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Activity
l DRRM SIDR for
schools approve -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ Report
Schools
utilized DRRM d utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize

uniform tools/te d by d by d by d by d by d by d by Coordinat used as
templates to mplates 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 or COVID-
accommodate at schoo schoo school school school school schoo 19
data school ls ls s s s s ls Facilities;
collection and level Form 3
feedback utilized SWHM;
mechanism by 48 Form 04
schools SSP;
Form 5
CSS;
Form 6
Incident
Report;
Form 7
AIR
Resilience Education
Quarte Division DRRM
Percentage of 6 co- Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Rolled Activity
rly DRRM Form 05
DRRM and/or curricul -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ -out/ Report;
Coordinat CSS
CCAM ar utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize utilize Attend or Monitorin
integrated in activitie d by d by d by d by d by d by d by ance
g Tool
the s rolled- 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 Sheet
curriculum out to schoo schoo school school school school schoo
48 ls ls s s s s ls
schools
Information, Education and Communication (IEC) and Advocacy for Resilience
Annua Division DRRM
Percentage of 3 Disse Disse Disse Disse Disse Disse Disse Activity
l DRRM Form 05
IEC and IEC/Adv minat minat minat minate minat minate minat Report;
Coordinat CSS
advocacy ocacy ed to ed to ed to d to ed to d to ed to Ackno
or Monitorin
resource material 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 wledg g Tool

materials on s schoo schoo school school school school schoo ment
DRRM and/or dissemi ls ls s s s s ls List/Re
CCAM nated to ceipt
disseminated 48
to schools schools
Learning Continuity and Resilience Interventions
Annua Division DRRM
Percentage of 42 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 School l DRRM Form 05
schools with schools schoo schoo school school school school schoo Memor
Coordinat CSS
Enabling with ls ls s s s s ls andum or Monitorin
mechanisms organize or
g Tool
to locally d DRRM Issuan
manage their Team ces
response, and
rehabilitation
& recovery
needs and
interventions
M & E DRRMS CSS Initiatives
Annua Division DRRM
Percentage of 45 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 DRRM
l DRRM Form 05
schools with schools schoo schoo school school school school schoo CSS
Coordinat CSS
Annual with ls ls s s s s ls Annual
or Monitorin
progress of progress Proges g Tool
CSS targets update s
on CSS Report
Indicato
rs
Health and Nutrition
I. Medical Services

Oversees the division and school populace through the management and implementation of health programs, provision of basic health &
nutrition services and establishment of a healthful school environment.
Once Program Annual

Percentage of 25% of 40% 50% 60% 70% of 80% 90% of 100% Accom every coordinato Accomplis
each major each of of of each of each of plishm end of rs hment
health major each each each major each major each ent
the Report
programs and health major major major health major health major report school
services program healt healt health progra health progra healt of each
year
implemented is h h progra m is progra m is h major
impleme progr progr m is imple m is imple progr health
nted. am is am is imple mente imple mente am is progra
imple imple mente d. mente d. imple m.
mente mente d. d. mente
d. d. d.
II. Dental Services
Monthl Dentist/s, Decayed,
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Decaye
y School Missing,
percent perce perce perce percen percen percen perce d,
heads, Filled
of the nt of nt of nt of t of t of t of nt of Missin
Teachers, Teeth
Percentage of 47 the the the 48 the 48 the 48 the 48 the g, Philippine (DMFT)
the elementary Element 48 48 Eleme Eleme Eleme Eleme 48 Filled
Dental Forms
ary & Eleme Eleme ntary ntary ntary ntary Eleme Teeth
and secondary Associatio
Seconda ntary ntary & & & & ntary (DMFT)
schools n (PDA)
ry & & Secon Secon Secon Secon & Forms
implemented Members
schools Secon Secon dary dary dary dary Secon
with Dental are dary dary school school school school dary
Health visited, schoo schoo s are s are s are s are schoo
Programs and examine ls are ls are visited visited visited visited ls are
Services d& visite visite , , , , visite
profiled. d, d, exami exami exami exami d,
exami exami ned & ned & ned & ned & exami

ned & ned & profile profile profile profile ned &
profil profil d. d. d. d. profile
ed. ed. d.
Monthl Dentist/s, SHD
100% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% SHD
y School Form 5B
the 47 of the of the of the of the of the of the of the Form
Heads,
Element 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 5B
Teachers,
ary and Eleme Eleme Eleme Eleme Eleme Eleme Eleme
Philippine
Seconda ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary
Dental
ry and and and and and and and
Associatio
schools Secon Secon Secon Secon Secon Secon Secon
n (PDA)
are dary dary dary dary dary dary dary
Members
visited schoo schoo school school school school schoo
and ls are ls are s are s are s are s are ls are
given visite visite visited visited visited visited visite
flouride d and d and and and and and d and
vaccinat given given given given given given given
ion. flouri flouri flourid flourid flourid flourid flouri
de de e e e e de
vacci vacci vaccin vaccin vaccin vaccin vacci
natio natio ation. ation. ation. ation. natio
n. n. n.
III. Nursing Services
Twice SBFP SBFP
60% of 65% 70% 75% 80% of 85% 90% of 95% Nutriti every District Forms 1
the of the of the of the the of the the of the onal
school and to 7
target target target target target target target target Status year Division
benefici benefi benefi benefi benefi benefi benefi benefi Report
(Baseli TWG,
aries ciarie ciarie ciaries ciaries ciaries ciaries ciarie of the ne and SBFP
have s s have have have have s School- Endlin Implement
improve have have impro improv impro improv have Based
e)
d their impro impro ved ed ved ed impro Feedin

nutritio ved ved their their their their ved g ing
nal their their nutriti nutriti nutriti nutriti their Progra Schools
status. nutrit nutrit onal onal onal onal nutrit m
ional ional status status. status status. ional (SBFP)
statu statu . . status
s. s. .
National Drug Education Program (NDEP)
Annua NDEP Monthly

50% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Monthl
l Division NDEP
the 47 of the of the of the of the of the of the of the y Consol and Report
schools 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 NDEP idated School
have schoo schoo school school school school schoo Report
NDEP Coordinat
received ls ls s have s have s have s have ls
Report ors.
anti- have have receiv receive receiv receive have
drug receiv receiv ed d anti- ed d anti- receiv
and ed ed anti- drug anti- drug ed
anti- anti- anti- drug and drug and anti-
smoking drug drug and anti- and anti- drug
advocac and and anti- smoki anti- smoki and
y anti- anti- smoki ng smoki ng anti-
initiativsmoki smoki ng advoca ng advoca smoki
es. ng ng advoc cy advoc cy ng
advoc advoc acy initiati acy initiati advoc
acy acy initiati ves. initiati ves. acy
initiat initiat ves. ves. initiat
ives. ives. ives.
WaSH in Schools (WinS) Program
Annua WinS WinS

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% WinS
l Division Online
submiss subm subm submi submi submi submi submi Online
and

ion of ission ission ssion ssion ssion ssion ssion Monito School Monitorin
WinS of of of of of of of ring Coordinat g Report
Online WinS WinS WinS WinS WinS WinS WinS Report ors/TWG
Monitori Onlin Onlin Online Online Online Online Onlin
Percentage of ng Tool e e Monit Monito Monit Monito e
the schools (WaSH Monit Monit oring ring oring ring Monit
implemented Facilitie oring oring Tool Tool Tool Tool oring
with nursing s, Safe Tool Tool (WaS (WaSH (WaS (WaSH Tool
health Drinking (WaS (WaS H Faciliti H Faciliti (WaS
Water, H H Faciliti es, Faciliti es, H
programs and
Function Facilit Facilit es, Safe es, Safe Facilit
services al Toilet, ies, ies, Safe Drinki Safe Drinki ies,
Waste Safe Safe Drinki ng Drinki ng Safe
Segregat Drinki Drinki ng Water, ng Water, Drinki
ion, ng ng Water, Functi Water, Functi ng
Food Water Water Functi onal Functi onal Water
Safety, , , onal Toilet, onal Toilet, ,
Deworm Functi Functi Toilet, Waste Toilet, Waste Functi
ing and onal onal Waste Segreg Waste Segreg onal
Menstru Toilet, Toilet, Segreg ation, Segreg ation, Toilet,
al Waste Waste ation, Food ation, Food Waste
Health Segre Segre Food Safety, Food Safety, Segre
Manage gation gation Safety Dewor Safety Dewor gation
ment). , Food , Food , ming , ming , Food
Safet Safet Dewor and Dewor and Safety
y, y, ming Menstr ming Menstr ,
Dewo Dewo and ual and ual Dewo
rming rming Menst Health Menst Health rming
and and rual Manag rual Manag and
Menst Menst Health ement) Health ement) Menst
rual rual Mana . Manag . rual

Healt Healt gemen ement) Healt
h h t). . h
Mana Mana Mana
geme geme geme
nt). nt). nt).
Adolescent Reproductive Health (ARH) Program
Annua ARH Rapid

100% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Rapid l Division HEEADS
the 14 of the of the of the of the of the of the of the HEEA
and SS
seconda 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 DSSS School Consolida
ry secon secon secon second secon secon secon Consoli
Coordinat ted
schools dary dary dary ary dary dary dary dated
or, Report
have schoo schoo school school school school schoo Report Guidance
undergo ls ls s have s have s have s have ls
Counselor
ne have have under under under under have
s
Rapid under under gone gone gone gone under
HEEAD gone gone Rapid Rapid Rapid Rapid gone
SSS Rapid Rapid HEEA HEEA HEEA HEEA Rapid
Assessm HEEA HEEA DSSS DSSS DSSS DSSS HEEA
ent. DSSS DSSS Asses Assess Assess Assess DSSS
Asses Asses sment ment. ment. ment. Asses
sment sment . sment
. . .
Mental Health Program
Annua Mental Annual

50% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Accom
l Health Accomplis
the 47 of the of the of the of the of the of the of the plishm
Division hment
element 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 ent
and Report
ary and eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme Report School
seconda ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary
Coordinat

ry and and and and and and and or,
schools secon secon secon second secon secon secon Guidance
has dary dary dary ary dary dary dary Counselor
received schoo schoo school school school school schoo s
advocac ls has ls has s has s has s has s has ls has
y receiv receiv receiv receive receiv receive receiv
initiativ ed ed ed d ed d ed
es. advoc advoc advoc advoca advoc advoca advoc
acy acy acy cy acy cy acy
initiat initiat initiati initiati initiati initiati initiat
ives. ives. ves. ves. ves. ves. ives.
Nursing Services
Annua Nurses SHD

70% of 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Consoli
l Form 5A
the 47 of the of the of the of the of the of the of the dated
element 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 SHD
ary and eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme eleme Form
seconda ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary ntary 5A
ry and and and and and and and
schools secon secon secon second secon secon secon
have dary dary dary ary dary dary dary
been schoo schoo school school school school schoo
examine ls ls s have s have s have s have ls
d. have have been been been been have
been been exami exami exami exami been
exami exami ned . ned . ned . ned . exami
ned . ned . ned .

Office of the Schools Division Superintendent (OSDS)

Key 2019-
Colle
Indicator 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 ction
LEGAL SECTION
100 100 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percentage 80% of % of % of of of of of of Regular
of receive recei recei receiv receiv receiv receiv receiv Legal monitor
Complaints d valid ved ved ed ed ed ed ed Record as Officer ing of
Acted Upon compla valid valid valid valid valid valid valid Book neede lodged
ints com com comp compl compl compl comp d complai
were plain plain laints aints aints aints laints nts
acted t ts are are are are are
upon were are acted acted acted acted acted
acted acte upon upon upon upon upon
upon d
upo
n
Percentage of 100 100 100% 100% 100% 100 100%
legal advices, % of % of of of of % of of Legal Close
legal requ requ reque reque reque requ reque Officer coordinati
documents est est st for st for st for est st for on with
interpreted for for legal legal legal for legal the Public

and legal legal legal servic servic servi legal servic Record Monthl Assistanc
opinions/dec 80% servi servi es es ces servi es Book y e
i sions of ces ces were were were ces were Coordinat
rendered vs reques were were acted acted acted were acted or
percentage of t for acted acte upon upon upon acted upon
incoming legal upon d upon
requests for servic upon
legal es
opinion/advi were
ces acted
upon
Percentage
of pleadings,
contracts,
MOAs, legal
briefs and Solicito
instruments r
prepared General Record
and/or 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Record Month , Legal Book,
reviewed Book ly Officer, Feedba
within the School ck
target date Head Form
vs
percentage
of requests
100
Percentage 100% 100 100 100% 100% 100% 100% % of School
of submitted of % of % of of of of of requi Head, Close
reports vs require requi requi requi requir requi requi re d Record As Child coordinati
percentage d red red red ed red red repor Book Requir Protectio on with
reports repor repor repor report repor repor ts ed n the

of required were
ts ts ts are s are ts are ts are are Coordina Regional
reports timely
were are timel timely timel timel timel te or, Office-
submitt
timel timel y subm y y y Legal Legal
ed y y subm itted subm subm sub Officer Division
sub sub itted itted itted mitt
mitte mitte ed
d d
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICE
Dashb
Full oard Prepare
implementat 102 102 113 118 122 127 130 133 monito user
ion Division Divisi pers pers perso perso perso perso perso ring Daily ITO login
Network on onne onn nnel nnel nnel nnel nnel from credent
Infra, Perso l el Mikroti ials
Structured nnel k Invento
Cabling device ry of
inside active
the users
Data accoun
cabinet t
Full 48 40 42 47 47 47 47 48 Procu Text and
implementati Sc scho scho schoo scho schoo scho scho red call for
on of Dipolog ho ols ols ls ols ls ols ols and monitorin
City Data ols conn conn conne conn conn conn conn signed ITO, g and
Management un ected ected cted ected ected ected ecte servic Weekl School school
Information der via via via via via via d via e y Principal principal
System thi fiber fiber fiber fiber fiber fiber fiber contra s s write a
(DCDMIS) s optic optic optic optic optic optic optic ct request
using Div cable cable cable cable cable cable cabl with letter for
localized IP isio with with with e the mainten
based n WiFi IP with local ance and

network exten phon CCT WiFi suppli assistanc
covering 40 der e V exte er. e.
schools nder
, IP
pho
ne
and
CCT
V
Prepared
Adoption of Users and
Office 365 Manage Signed
account to ment Division
teaching 1527 50% 60% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% Accoun Weekl ITO Memo on
and non- Person t for y the
teaching nel Office Adoption
personnel 365 of Office
this division (Admini 365
strator attached
Accoun Central
t) Office
Memoran
dum
Conduct
Full School ed
implementati s will SDS, training
on of 48 submi ITO, at Galas
Document Sc 60% 75% 90% 100% 100% 100% 100% t Daily School Element
Tracking ho report Principal ary
System ols s with s, School
un QRCo on how

(DTS) via der de for Records to use
DCDMIS thi Docu Section the
s ment Docume
Di Tracki nt
vis ng Tracking
ion Syste System
m
ACCOUNTING SECTION
Account
Timely Monit ant III, Regular
downloadin oring School monitori
g and 48 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sheet Month Heads ng of
liquidation schools and ly Administ download
of School Scho rative ing and
MOOE ol Assistan liquidatio
Oper t n of
ating III School
Budg MOOE
et
Timely Tax
remittances Remit Accounta
of BIR All tance nt III and Regular
withholding teachi Advic Administ review
taxes, Phil ng and 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% e, Phil Month rative and
Health non- health ly Assistant monitori
Premiums teachi Monit III ng of the
and Pag-Ibig ng oring remittan
Premiums person Form ces
nel and
under Pag-
this Ibig

divisio Monit
n oring
Form
Utilization of
Notice of Regis Accounta
Cash try of nt III and Preparat
Allocation 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Allot Month Administ ion of
(NCA) utilizati ment ly rative payables
credited on of and Assistant (e.g
quarterly to NCA Notic III supplier
depository e of s) in
bank Cash advance
Alloc
ation
(RAN
CA)
Update
encodin
Accounta g of
Accurate nt III, entries
and timely 36 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Financ Month Administ from
financial mont ial ly rative Disburs
reports hly statem Assistant ement
report ents III Voucher
s (DV) and
Journal
Entry
Voucher
(JEV to
GAFR
system

Accounta Daily
Reconciled monthl Bank nt III and entry to
bank and y 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% statem Month Administ the
book records reconci ents ly rative GAFR
liation and Assistant (Govern
of bank book III ment
and balanc Account
book es ing and
records Financi
al
Reports)
Daily
Borrow Accounta updating
Updated 100% er's nt III and of ledger
provident updati 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Ledger Month Administ cards
loan ng of Card ly rative and
balances loan and Assistant monitori
ledger Provide III ng of
cards nt loan
Loan applicati
Master ons and
list payment
s
BUDGET SECTION
Budget Review
Preparatio Program and
n to proponen Evaluate
prepare t, budget s current
budget Approv officer, budget
proposal of 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% ed Annu SDS, proposal
the Schools Budget ally vis a vis

Division Propos Planning prior
including al Officer, year's
proposal on Forms School budget to
yearly Bookkeep determin
increase of ers e the
all PAPs need to
increase/
decrease
in
allotment
Budget
Executio
n Program
proponen
To properly Approv t, budget Certifies
manage the 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ed Daily officer, availabilit
allocation of Certific SDS, y of
the budget ate of School allotment
from Availab Bookkeep of all
General ility of ers transactio
Appropriati Allotm ns
on Act (GAA) ent
and the
special
allotment
received
Program
Budget proponen Gather
Accountabili Approv t, budget financia
ty and ed officer, l data
Reporting 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Budget SDS, ahead

and Month School of time
To prepare Financi ly/ Bookkeep from
financial al Quart ers, schools
reports of Accoun erly Principal and
the Schools tability , Division
Division Report Account office
s ant proper
(BFAR for
S) consolid
ation
Budget 2022 Registr Budget Weekly
Monitoring 90%- y of Officer, Monitorin
and DO Allotm ADAs, g of Sub-
Evaluation P ent, Division aro
to fully r Obliga Chiefs, utilizatio
utilized o tions End n with
current p and Month user, end user
GAA e 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% Disbur ly/ Senior
allotment r semen Quart Bookkee Report
and 9 ts erly p er, to
forwarded 9 (RAOD School EXECO
unobligated % ), Heads M the
balances - BFARS unoblig
(continuing) Imple ated
including menti balance
IUs ng s of
Units each
(IUs) PAPs
92%-
Over
all

2021
81%-
DO
P
r
o
p
e
r
9
4
%
-
Imple
menti
ng
Units
(IUs)
84%-
Over
all
PERSONNEL SECTION
Full 1527 0 200 700 700 Gener Month ITO, Prepare

implementat person ated ly Personne memora
ion of UMIS nel PDS l Section ndum
from Staff, for SDS
the and approva
syste Administ l re:
m r ative submiss

Officers ion of
II updated
PDS
Request
the ITO
on the
orientat
ion of
using
the
system
Full 1140 0 Personne Prepare

implementat person 1140 100% 100% 100% 100% Gener Month l Section the data
ion of the nel ated ly Staff, needed
Payroll payrol ITO in the
System l and preparati
before paysli on of
December ps Division
31, Payroll
2023 System
Unit
Upload
the
needed
data in
the
DPSU

Print
sample
of payslip
and
check the
accuracy
of
data
uploaded
Check
and
review
Printe guideline
d s,
Quality Quali policies,
Assured 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ty AOIV forms,
Manual of Assur and
Operation ed processe
Manu s of
al of Personne
Opera l Section
tion
for Submit
Perso to QA for
nnel review
Sectio and
n control
Provide
copy to

Personne
l Staff for
reference
s
CASH SECTION
Total NCA Check En Cashier, regular

received and 34 and d of DO II, review
disbursed 37 40 44 48 52 55 ADA Eve Admin. prooflist
for the year Disbu ry Aide VI from GSB
rseme Mo
nt nth
Recor ly
d,
PAID
DVs,
Number of Cashier, regular
employees 1104 Bi- DO II, review
paid with 1215 1135 1250 1375 1512 1650 Payroll month Admin. prooflist
salaries and ly Aide VI from GSB
incentives
Solicit
feedback
Total Cashier, from
Disburseme Disbu DO II, creditor
nt s made 1140 1250 1380 1500 1670 1850 2000 rseme Month Admin. s as to
and nt ly Aide VI the
creditors vouch timeline
paid ers ss of
payment
in

accorda
nce with
the DTS
of the
Division
office.
SUPPLY SECTION
Number of Repor Property

properties t on and
both fixed 1757 2500 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 the Supply Physical
and Physi Annu Section Inventor
movable cal al and y
within the Count Inventory
jurisdiction of Committ
supervised Prope ee
rty,
Plant,
and
Equip
ment,
Number of
Schools, Project
Learning Procur
Centers ement Property Report on
and SDO 192 192 288 288 288 288 288 288 Manag Quart and Supplies
provided ement erly Supply and
with Plan, Section Materials
necessary Requis Issued
supplies, ition
materials and

and Issue
equipment Slip
Number of
Annual
Procurement Projec
Request t Every
prepared for Procur time a Property Certificat
procurement ement Purch and e of Non-
of supplies Manag ase Supply Availabili
and 30 36 40 45 50 55 60 65 ement Reque Section ty of
materials at Plan st for Stocks
Procurement comm
Service- on
Department suppli
of Budget es
and and
Management equip
ment
is
receiv
ed
RECORDS SECTION
Supervised Emails; Review

mailing Daily
daily All daily the
Records of emails
maintenance sectio Records incoming
Manage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% docume and
of an effective n Section and
ment nts thru weekly
flow of units outgoing
service for
communicatio communic
courier mailing
ns throughout ations

the docume thru
department nts logbook
and monitors
progress of
systematic
filing of
documents
monthly.
Reviewed and
classified
Review
documents
daily the
according to
incoming
the All Hard
Records and
established sectio copy of Records
Manage Daily outgoing
Functional n docume Section
ment communic
Subject units nts
ations
Alphabetic
thru
Classification
logbook
System
(FSACS) daily 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Required Logbook
All Approve
approval for Records As and
sectio d hard Records
issuance of Manage request approved
n copy of Section
requested ment ed letter
units requeste
documents request
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% d
based on

existing documm
records ents
management
policies and
procedures
Supervised
work progress Daily Updated
of staff Records Resor Monitori Monitoring
Records
performing Manage dsecti 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ng Daily Performan
Section
Records ment on Checklis ce
Management t Checklist
processes
As soon Per
Soft
as approved
Supervised copy of
Record request
inventory All docume
Records s from
preservation sectio nts and Records
Manage 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% issued National
and disposal n hard Section
ment an Archives of
of Records units copy of
Annual the
annually Inventor
Invento Philippines
y
ry (NAP)
GENERAL SERVICES
Number of Project General Prepare

Stockroom 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 Procure Services, Purchase
to ment AO V

be Manage Upon Request
constructed ment Reque for SDS
st Approval

II. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Projected Cost Estimates by Key Level and Cost Type, BEDP
(in Php millions)
SCHOOL YEAR
BEDP costs by level and cost 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
type school year
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Kindergarten and
Elementary
Recurrent 19, 505 20, 090 20, 21, 21, 953 22,
693 314 612
Capital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Junior High School
Recurrent 18, 160 18, 705 19, 19, 20, 439 21,
266 844 052
Capital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior High School
Recurrent 9, 398 9, 680 9, 970 10, 10, 578 10,
269 895
Capital 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTALS 47, 063 48, 49, 51, 52, 54,
475 929 427 970 559

Part VI: Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustments (MEA)
Monitoring, Evaluation, and Adjustment (MEA) provide a way to assess the

crucial link between implementers and beneficiaries on the ground and
decision-makers; it adds to the retention and development of institutional
memory; it provides a more robust basis for raising funds and influencing
policy.
MEA puts into operation a systematic process for the collection, collation, and
analysis of key education data and information that will allow DepEd’s
decision-makers, implementers at each DepEd governance level, and other
stakeholders to collectively appreciate both achievement and challenges in the
basic education sector. The main objective of the MEA is to facilitate decision-
making for a more relevant and responsive delivery of basic education
services.
The Basic Education Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (BEMEF) which

aims to ensure that the agency’s plans, policies, systems, and processes are
geared towards the achievement of organizational outcomes has been
implemented in the different governance levels in the Department of
Education.
Figure _: Basic Education Monitoring & Evaluation Framework (BEMEF)
This Framework sets the performance measures for the agency to where
all operating units are expected to contribute. This framework shall also guide
DepEd bureaus, services, regional and schools division offices, schools, and
learning centers in developing their respective M&E plan. Lastly, it shall
define the roles and responsibilities of DepEd operating units in the M&E
system and processes (DO 029, S. 2022).

SDO-Dipolog City has been continuously working since the ISO Certification
the management function which is to assess if progress is made in achieving
expected results, to spot bottlenecks in implementation, and to highlight
whether there are any unintended effects (positive or negative) from an
activity, program, or project. The Division Monitoring and Evaluation
Framework (DMEF) is anchored on the four core processes of the Basic
Education Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (BEMEF) as (I)
Establishment of Purpose and Scope; (II) Data Collection and Management;
(III) Data Analysis; and (IV) Information Dissemination, Reporting, and
Utilization and the Regional Monitoring & Evaluation Framework with the
four components such as the (I) RQAME Team: Orientation, Tool Preparation,
and Retooling; (II) RQAME Team: Division Offices, SHS, JHS & ES; (III) M & E
Analysis: Consolidation to be Submitted to FTAD; and (IV) RQAME Team:
RD/ARD Presents QAME Results and Findings during REMANCOM.
Figure _: Regional Monitoring & Evaluation Framework (BEMEF)
The DMEF has been embedded in the key stages of the PAPs Development
Framework. From strategy formulation to strategy implementation and
monitoring and evaluation. The mechanism and the detail of the processes of
monitoring and evaluation following the four core processes such as the
establishment of the purpose and scope, data collection and management,
data analysis, and utilization and reporting of the results are explicitly
presented in the BEMEF matrix as contextualized by the SMME.

Below is the conceptualized framework of SDO-Dipolog City relative to
monitoring and evaluation anchored on BEMEF and RMEF.
Figure _: PAPs Development Framework with Monitoring and

Evaluation
A. CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION DIVISION (CID)
The Curriculum Implementation Division is one of the three functional offices

created under DO 50, s. 2014, otherwise known as the Guidelines on Recruitment,
Selection, and Placement of Personnel pursuant to the DepEd Rationalization
Program of Executive Order No. 366, s. 2004.
SDO CID has mandated tasks explicitly presented in the following key Result
Areas:
• Implementation of the articulated Basic Education Curriculum for

Kindergarten, Elementary School, Junior, and Senior High Schools
characterized by inclusivity and continual improvement in our practices as
manifest through contextualization – localization and indigenization of
learning resources, pedagogical content knowledge, unpacking of power
standards (learning competencies) towards the improvement in the quality of
learning outcomes;
• Implementation of special interest programs – IPEd, MADRASAH

ALIVE, SPA, SPJ, STE, SSES, SPED, and other curricular support
programs like ELLN, MTB-MLE, Phil-IRI among others;
• Improvement in the provision and availability of quality-assured
learning and teaching resource materials for teachers and learners
through the LRMDS;
• Conduct of action and basic research and the utilization of research
findings to improve instructions and performance of learners;
• Provision of technical assistance to school administrators and teachers
through monitoring and evaluation of our processes in the areas of
Instructional Supervision, Development of Instructional Materials,
Education Research, Assessment Tools Development and
Administration, and the implementation of curriculum-related programs;
and
• Improvement of access to basic functional literacy and raising the level
of literacy in the deprived, disadvantaged, and underserved areas of
the community.
A.1. CID Monitoring and Evaluation

A.1.1. Quarterly Supervisory Report of the Division and District
Supervisors
A.1.2. Monthly Review of Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
Monitoring Report / CID Monitoring Report (Master Programs, Instructional
Monitoring)
A.1.3. Quarterly Review and Validation of the Monitoring Report from

the field/Schools
A.1.4. Annual Review of Inclusive Education Report
A.1.5. Quarterly Review & Validation of the data in the Monitoring

Report of Learning Resource Quality Assurance and Conformance
A.1.6. Annual Review and Analysis of the M & E online survey at every
end of the training and LR Monitoring Tools
A.1.7. BOSY & 3rd Quarter review and validation of school

consolidated reports on reading, field monitoring of learners' reading
progress in schools, online monitoring of school-initiated reading activities,
and school compliance to CO/RO/SDO-mandated programs and activities,
feedback from reading coordinators and school heads
A.1.8. Year-end M & E online every Classroom Observation Tool/

Student feedbacking ( Survey or FGD)
A.1.9. Semestral and Year-end CID Program Implementation
Review/Report
B. SCHOOL GOVERNANCE AND OPERATION DIVISION (SGOD)
The School Governance and Operations Division (SGOD) is one of the

newly created offices under the DO 50, s. 2014 - Guidelines on the
Recruitment, Selection, and Placement of Personnel pursuant to the DepEd
Rationalization Program under Executive Order No. 366 s. 2004. This division
strengthens the delivery of quality basic education by helping schools and
learning centers to create a conducive environment for the teaching-learning
process to take place, provide for the holistic development of learners, and
ensure their readiness to learn through timely planning, mobilization, and
equitable distribution of sufficient resources, development of the human
resource, provision of technical assistance and building of strong partnership
with stakeholders for increased support and resources for the effective and
efficient implementation of sustainable programs, projects and services
towards increasing access and enhancing the delivery of quality basic
education.
School Governance and Operations Division supports and capacitates

Schools and Learning Centers in ensuring a conducive learning environment
and in compliance with quality standards of Governance and Operations. It
focuses to take on as part of its core function of providing oversight and
ensuring due diligence in the management of schools. Part of providing
oversight that schools operate according to set standards is ensuring that the
schools get the resources they need to operate and comply with such
standards.
• Social Mobilization and Networking Section
To ensure the provision of adequate resources to schools and learning

centers by strengthening and sustaining relationships and collaboration of
education partners and stakeholders and providing technical assistance in
line with the resource mobilization to support special programs and projects
for increasing access and enhancing the delivery of quality basic education.
• School Management, Monitoring, and Evaluation

Section
To ensure quality management systems implementation and adherence

to standards and policies on assessment, and provision of TA towards effective
and efficient delivery of basic education services of schools and learning
centers
• Planning and Research Section
To provide the management of the Schools Division Office, schools, and

learning centers with accurate, timely, and reliable data and information as
critical inputs and bases for the formulation and implementation of
educational plans, research, standards, and guidelines, by maintaining and
updating the division’s basic education information system, performing
analysis and generating reports on educational indicators.
• School Health & Nutrition S ection
To promote, protect and maintain the physical and mental well-being

and readiness of learners to learn, by providing sustainable Health and
Nutrition Program Services by establishing and strengthening linkages with
educational partners and stakeholders
• Human Resource Development Section
The Human Resource Development Section ensures the competence of

both the teaching and non-teaching personnel of the division, schools, and
learning centers by efficiently and effectively installing, implementing, and
managing the HRD services and T&D Systems, scholarship and training
grants, and by providing technical assistance on the implementation of the
Employee Benefits Programs, needs-based training and professional
development programs.
• Education Facilities Se ction
To provide schools, learning centers, and the Schools Division Office

with a physical environment that is conducive to effective teaching, learning,
and working, by ensuring access to adequate, structurally and physically safe
buildings, grounds, and facilities according to the requirements and
standards of an environmentally sustainable, hazard free, gender-sensitive
and friendly to people with disability, education and work facilities.
• Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Services
To ensure safety and learning continuity and strengthen the resilience

of schools and learners by empowering DepEd personnel and offices at all
levels to institutionalize Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM),
Climate Change Adaptation (CCA), and Education in Emergencies (EiE) in the
basic education in the context of natural and human-induced hazards.
• Youth Formation Section
This is responsible for performing technical tasks in the implementation

and monitoring of the youth formation programs at the division level. The
position is also responsible for assessing, crafting, and delivering youth
formation programs that are contextualized and localized depending on the
needs of the schools. The position is also responsible for providing technical
assistance to schools and providing policy recommendations at the division
level.
B.1. SGOD Monitoring and Evaluation
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
B.1.1. Annual & Quarterly Review of Comprehensive School Safety

(CSS) Monitoring Report (Form 05)
B.1.2. Annual & Quarterly Review of Site Inspection and Damage

Report of the Schools and Learning Center (Interface between the DRRM and
Educational Facilities)
Education Facilities
B.1.3. Annual Review of the Monitoring of the School Sites (EFD
Assessment / Validation Form, School Site Appraisal Form)
B.1.4. Periodic School Project Implementation Actual Ocular
Inspection and Monitoring Report of Classroom Construction and Repair
B.1.5. Project Inspection of Testing Results of the delivered materials
to check the adherence to standards or specifications

B.1.6. Project Monitoring and observation of the construction
activities which need improvement & rectification.
B.1.7. Annual Validation of NSBI (Updating) such as reported repaired
classrooms/buildings and demolished buildings
B.1.8. Annual Review of Consolidated Training Needs

Assessment (TNA)and I ndividual Development Needs
B.1.9. Periodic Training Review of the Program Owners and

Resource Speakers
B.1.10.Semestral Review of the Scholarship Programs
Report
Research and Planning
B.1.11. Quarterly Review of the Performance Indicators and

submission of the Report to DBM
B.1.12. Daily Monitoring of the LIS Online Status and

Validation of the LIS Dashboard
B.1.13. Annual Program Review of the Completed Research
B.1.14. Sexennial Program Review of the Division

Educational Development Plan (DEDP), Triennial Program Review of
the School Improvement Plan (SIP) Implementation, and Annual Program
Review of the Annual Implementation Plan (AIP) and Basic Education
Development Plan (BEDP)
School Health & Nutrition
B.1.15. Periodic Program Review of the Health, Nutrition, and Dental

Services
B.1.16. Monthly Monitoring of Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth and
Flouride Vaccination (DMFT Forms & SHD Form 5B)
B.1.17. Semestral Review and Monitoring of the Nutritional Status

Report of the learners for the School-Based Feeding Program (baseline and
endline SBFP Forms 1 to 7)
B.1.18. Monthly Review of the National Drug Education Program

(NDEP) Report
B.1.19. Periodic Review of WinS (WaSH Facilities, Safe Drinking

Water, Functional Toilet, Waste Segregation, Food Safety, Deworming, and
Menstrual Health Management) Online Monitoring Report
B.1.20. Annual Program Review and Monitoring of Rapid HEEADSSS,
and Mental Health Consolidated Report
School Management, Monitoring, and Evaluation

B.1.21. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the M&E result on the
implementation of the Division Assessment Program aligned to the national
assessment framework and the conduct of National, Regional, and Division
Assessment
B.1.22. Annual Review and Evaluation of Validation of documents of

schools requesting Government Permit to Operate/Recognition, Special
Order, Tuition Fee Increase, and Certificate of Good Standing.
B.1.24. Periodic Review and Monitoring of the quality assurance

processes on School Planning, School Based Management (SBM), School
Governance Council (SGC), Basic Education Monitoring and Evaluation
Framework (BEMEF), and Implementation of Programs and Projects as the
basis for Continous Improvement
B.1.25. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the School report

Validated the School Achievement and Learning Outcome by gathering data
utilizing prescribed approaches and methods.
B.1.26. Annual Program Review the report/documents on best
practices concerning school management and governance for sharing and
benchmarking purposes
B.1.27. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the Implementing

processes for monitoring and evaluating the organization's effectiveness of
the schools and division office
Social Mobilization and Networking
B.1.28. Annual Review and Monitoring of the advocacy

campaigns conducted to stakeholders to support basic education
B.1.29. Periodic Review of the partners/ stakeholders profile Report

and MOA/MOU
B.1.30. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the Resource Generated

through DPDS
B.1.31. Semestral Review of the Partnership/Linkages
Youth Formation
B.1.32. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the Youth Formation

mandated PPAs from CO and RO implementation
B.1.33. Annual Review of the Consolidated Report on Election of

Supreme Pupil Government (SPG)/Supreme Student Government (SSG),
Youth for Environment in Schools-Org YES-O) and Barkada Kontra Droga
(BKD) and Capacity-building for teacher-adviser
B.1.34. Annual Review of the Student Government’s initiated program

implementation
Office of the School Governance and Operation Division Chief
B.1.35 Semestral and Year-end SGOD Program Implementation

Review/Report
C. OFFICE OF THE SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT (OSDS)
On November 15, 2013, the DepEd Rationalization Plan (RP) was approved by
the Department of Budget and Management (DBM). The approval included the
rationalized structure and staffing pattern of offices at the central, regional, and
school division levels.
The approved organizational structures are consistent with the provisions of

RA 9155 in applying the principles of decentralization and shared governance to
ensure accountability and relevance to the context, and development needs of the
learners and stakeholders of the various organizational levels thus, the new structure
of the Office of the Schools Division Superintendent, to wit;
Office of the SDS
Proper accountabilities are: to ensure access to, promote equity in, and
continuously improve the quality of basic education in the school's divisions
under his/her care by leading in the development and implementation of the
division’s education development plans (DEDP), programs, and standards
(consistent with the national educational policies, plans, and standards),
building partnerships and networking with stakeholders of education, as well
as by effectively and efficiently managing the financial, human, and physical
resources of the school's division
Legal Services
Provide legal advice and render legal opinions to officials and employees
concerning the performance of their functions, interpret laws and rules
affecting the operation of various programs of the school's division, and
handles legal and investigation matters concerning the schools division office
and its employees, including those delegated by the Regional office.
Information and Communic ation Technology (ICT) Services
Manage and maintain the Information and Communication Technology

(ICT) Systems and Infrastructure of the schools division to effectively support
operations and manage and implement ICT programs and projects in the
schools division to ensure data validity and effective utilization of the system.
Administrative Services
Composed of Cash, Personnel, Records, Asset Management, and
general Services whose accountability is to provide management with
economical, efficient, and effective administrative services on personnel,

properties, cash, facilities, and materials to support operations of the schools
division.
Finance Services
Provide SDO management with economical, efficient, and effective

accounting and budgeting services to ensure the cost-effective utilization of
financial resources of the schools division.
C.1. OSDS Monitoring and Evaluation
Office of the Schools Division Superintendent
C.1.1. Quarterly Conduct of Program Implementation Review (Across 3

functional Units and the Schools)
C.1.2. Periodic Conduct of Executive Committee Meeting (EXECOM)

and Division Management Committee Meeting (DIMANCOM)
C.1.3. Bi-annual Conduct of the State of the Division Address (SODA)
Budget Section
C.1.4. Quarterly Review and Evaluation of the current budget

proposal vis a vis the prior year's budget to determine the need to
increase/decrease in allotment
C.1.5. Daily Review of the Certification of the availability of

allotment of all transactions
C.1.6. Monthly Review of the gathered financial data from schools

and Division office proper for consolidation report
C.1.7. Weekly Review and Monitoring of Sub-aro utilization with

the end user and Report to Execom the unobligated balances of
each PAP
Supply/Asset Management Office
C.1.8. Annual Review and Evaluation of the Physical Inventory of

properties both fixed and movable within the jurisdiction
C.1.9. Quarterly Review and Monitoring of the Report on Supplies

and Materials/Equipment Issued
Record Section
C.1.10. Daily Review and Monitoring of the flow of

communication and progress of systematic filing of documents.
C.1.11. Daily Review and Classification of documents according

to established Functional Subject Alphabetic Classification System
C.1.12. Periodic Review and Monitoring of the issuance of

requested documents based on existing records management policies and
procedures
C.1.13. Monthly Review and Monitoring of the supervised work

progress of staff performing Records Management processes
C.1.14. Annual Review and Evaluation of the Inventory

Preservation and disposal of Records
Cash Section
C.1.15. Monthly Regular Review of the Prooflist from GSB
C.1.16. Monthly Review of the Solicited feedback from creditors

as to the timeliness of payment in accordance with the DTS of the
Division Office
Personnel/HRM Section
C.1.17. Monthly Review of the Updated PDS and Requested UMIS
Orientation from ITO
C.1.18. Monthly Review and Monitoring in the preparation of the
Division Payroll System Unit and Uploaded the needed data in the DPSU for
the payslip and accuracy check-up
C.1.19. Periodic Review and Monitoring of the guidelines, policies,

forms, and processes of the Personnel Section and submission to Quality
Assurance for quality control
General Service
C.1.20. Daily Review and Monitoring of the General Services
Activities such as housekeeping, utility worker area assignment, and other
related activity
C.1.21. Daily Monitoring of the Ocular Inspection Report of the

utility workers
Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
C.1.22. Daily Review and Monitoring of user login

Credentials Inventory of active user's account
C.1.23. Weekly Review and Monitoring of the text and call of the
employee ICT maintenance and assistance
C.1.24. Daily Review and Monitoring of the migration to and

adoption of Office 365
C. 1. 25 Periodic Review and Monitoring of the Document
Tracking System Implementation and Unified Information System
Accounting Section
C.1.26. Monthly Review and Monitoring of the Remittances

and Payables (e.g suppliers)
C.1.27. Daily Review and Monitoring of the Updated entries from

the Disbursement Voucher (DV), Journal Entry Voucher (JEV to the
GAFR system, and GAFR (Government Accounting and Financial
Reports)
C.1.28. Daily Review and Monitoring of the ledger cards and
monitoring of loan applications and payments

VII: Analysis and Management of Risk
Risk Management has been implemented in SDO-Dipolog City since its

Certification by an external Certifying Body. According to ISO 9001:2015,
planning for risk is a form of quality management, and doing so contextually
ensures that the business’ quality management system is able to achieve its
intended results by preventing or reducing the risk and also mitigating any of
the potential side effects of an undesired outcome.
These must include the registry of identified Risks, its description, and the
strategic solutions to mitigate the impact of each identified risk.
RISK ASSESSMENT/ CATEGORY
Likelihood Rare, Unlikely, Moderate, Likely, Almost Certain
Consequence Insignificant, Minor, Moderate, Major
Outcome Low, Moderate, High, Extreme
Controlled Low, Moderate, High, Extreme

Outcome
Likelihood Consequences
Insignifican Minor Moderate Major Catastrophi

t (Minor (Some (Significa (Operation c (Business
problem disrupti nt time/ s severely survival is
easily on resources damaged) at risk
handled by possible required)
normal day-
to-day
processes)
Almost certain High High Extreme Extreme Extreme
(e.g. >90% chance)
Likely Moderate High High Extreme Extreme
(e.g. between 70%

and 90% chance)
Moderate (e.g. Low Moderat High Extreme Extreme

between 10% and e
50% chance)
Unlikely Low Low Moderate High Extreme
(e.g. between 3%
and 10 % chance)
Rare Low Low Moderate High High
(e.g. <3% chance)
Low Job/Task can be carried out without any further controlling factors.

Job/Task can be carried out with controlling factors implemented.
Moderate
Job/Task cannot be carried out until controlling factors are put in

High place to ensure its end consequence is brought down to moderate or
below.
Job/Task should not be undertaken unless controlling factors have

been put in place which brings the consequence to a tolerable level of
Extreme
mnoderate or below. Even with controlling factors in place the job
should be undertaken with extreme. care and continual assessment.

ANALYSIS AND RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SDO-DIPOLOG CITY PAPs
NAME OF DESCRIPTION LIKELIHOOD TO SEVERITY OF PREVENTIVE MITIGATION

PROGRAM, OF RISK HAPPEN (Very EFFECT ON THE ACTION ACTION
ACTIVITY, Likely, Likely, PAPs
PROJECT & Unlikely) (What to do to (If or when a risk
POLICY (High, Medium, prevent the risk happens, what do
Low) from occurring) you need to do to
mitigate its effect on
the project)
CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION DIVISION (CID)
Learning Action Cell Non-compliance Very Likely High Upskilling and To provide technical
to the regular reskilling of the assistance to the
conduct of the school LAC Team School Heads,
Schools Learning through the Master Teachers,
Action Cell capacity workshop and other School
LAC Team members
LR Review Non-compliance Very Likely High Upskilling and To provide technical

Contextualize to quality reskilling of quality assistance among
Learning Resources assurance and assurers through the quality assurers
contextualization the capacity
standards by the workshop
responsible
persons

Seminar-Workshop Teachers are Likely Medium Encourage By providing a clear
on the Upskilling hesitant to adopt teachers to heartily and compelling
and Re-Skilling of change open their minds rationale for ICT
EPP/TLE/TVL and accept integration:
teachers on the gradually the new Communicate the
Integration of insights for the benefits of ICT
Technology to improvement of integration in
Assessment and the learners teaching and how it
Pedagogy through aligns with the
collaboration with curriculum and
their colleagues learners’ learning
who are experts in outcome
ICT
Teachers have Likely Medium Provision of ICT By providing access

limited access to gadgets like to technology and
technology and tablets, laptops, resources: Provide
resources and internet teachers with
connectivity access to the
among others necessary
technology and
resources to
integrate ICT in the
classroom
Teachers have Likely Medium Provision of By providing

limited continuous ongoing support

technology support to and professional
literacy teachers on development:
technology literacy Provide teachers
with ongoing
support and
professional
development
opportunities to
continue to improve
their ICT integration
skills
Teachers have Likely Medium Send teachers to By building a

limited support seminars and culture of
and professional workshops on ICT technology
development related on integration:
Saturdays and Encourage the use
Sundays or during of technology
the summer period throughout the
school, and
recognize and
reward teachers
who effectively
integrate technology
into teaching

Orientation/Capacit Lack of Budget Likely Medium Source out funds Can be done
y building of for the from the SEF through online
Secondary Schools Orientation orientation
on DepEd Order 54,
s. 2022 and JDVP
Guidelines
Validated the ff. To provide technical

school data: assistance to the
School Heads and
Master Class Teachers
Program -Non-compliance Likely Medium Use of Master
with the Program
prescribed no. of Monitoring Tool
minutes Moderate Low Use of Master
-Erroneous Program
subject Monitoring Tool
nomenclature Moderate Low
Use of Master
-Non-compliance Program
with Pre- Monitoring Tool
requisite
subjects
Retooling of the • Conflict of Likely Medium • Proper • Reschedule

newly hired teaching schedule channeling the activity for

and non-teaching with other of its possible
personnel including seminars communicati implementatio
newly hired school on for proper n.
heads with IPEd scheduling • Request funds
competencies of activities from the SEF
• Availability Likely Medium • Coordinate or HRTD
of funds with the
Budget
officer for
possible
allocation of
budget from
the PSF
• Encourage
• Resistance collaboration
Likely • Communicat and peer
to change Medium
e the reason support
for the among
change to teachers to
the teachers build a sense
for them to of
be motivated responsibility
to for the change
participate
Seminar-workshop Cultural Likely High Provide TA with Have the quality

on crafting appropriation the proper and assurance of the
indigenous learning appropriate output

materials crafting of
indigenous
learning materials
Quarterly Faulty test Very likely High Ensure that the Monitor and
Assessment questions test questions are evaluate the
aligned with the effectiveness of the
MELCS and test and provide TA
Likely Medium
Late submission embedded in the
of Quarterly TOS
Assessment
Result
Create and provide
Quarterly
Assessment
Monitoring Tool
Establishment of Bias and Very likely High Regularly updated All test items are
test item bank in discrimination and reviewed the subjected to test
schools test questions item analysis.
Analyzed Quarterly Test bias likely Medium Use criterion- Reviewed and
Assessment referenced updated the test
approach regularly to ensure
it is fair and
unbiased.

Consulted expert for
TA
Curriculum-based Limited feedback Very likely High medium Encourage the Involved the
assessment stakeholders to stakeholders in the
likely provide feedback assessment process
on the and communicate
implementation of assessment results
the curriculum for
policy
recommendations
Inquiry-Based Delay of the Likely High Submission of Consistent follow-

Science Teaching: NEAP NEAP HRD L&D up with RO NEAP
Training -Workshop Recognition Documents (a
for Elementary and (REC) and proposal, Form
Secondary Science Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget
Close coordination
Teachers process Matrix, CV, etc.) with other program
earlier than the owners on the
Very likely High deadline set by RO arrangement of
Conflict of CID 9 activity schedule
activity schedule
STE and SSES Delay of the Likely High Submission of Consistent follow-
Training for NEAP NEAP HRD L&D up with RO NEAP
Teachers on Recognition Documents (a

Emergent Strategies (REC) and proposal, Form
Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget
process Matrix, CV, etc.) Close coordination
earlier than the with other program
Very likely High owners on the
deadline set by RO
9 arrangement of
Conflict of CID activity schedule
activity schedule
Capacity Building Delay of the Likely High Submission of Consistent follow-

for Senior High NEAP NEAP HRD L&D up with RO NEAP
School Teachers in Recognition Documents (a
the Tracks and (REC) and proposal, Form
Strands Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget Close coordination
process Matrix, CV, etc.) with other program
activity schedule
Division Training Delay of the Likely High Submission of Consistent follow-

Workshop in NEAP NEAP HRD L&D up with RO NEAP
Teaching Grammar Recognition Documents (a
Communicatively for (REC) and proposal, Form
English Teachers Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget Close coordination
process Matrix, CV, etc.) with other program

9 activity schedule
Conflict of CID
activity schedule
Division Training on Delay of the Likely High Submission of Consistent follow-

Literacy for English NEAP NEAP HRD L&D up with RO NEAP
Teachers. School Recognition Documents (a
Reading (REC) and proposal, Form
Coordinators and Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget Close coordination
Implementers process Matrix, CV, etc.) with other program
(Division Training on Very likely High deadline set by RO
Literacy Instruction arrangement of
for Untrained
English Reading activity schedule
Teachers/Implement
ers)
Division Training on Limited time and Set priorities (what Consistently create
Interactive Learning competing must come first be and incorporate an
Strategies For priorities the first) effective learning
Teachers in Araling (overlapping and development
Panlipunan for Key schedules) Plan according to strategy
Stages 1-4 the approved
Limited budget allocated budget
and training
Prepare in advance Creation/

resources all needed development of
resources and training
Information materials activity/program
overload (may that always starts
lead to a lack of Introduce new with the analysis
interest ideas, exciting,
fun, and
Poor planning educational
and timing concepts Collaboration and
Likely Medium cooperation with all
Insufficient Prepare technical working
monitoring and monitoring and groups and all
evaluation of the evaluation others involved in
implementation schedule in the the program
of said implementation of
program/activity the program
Relying on Ensure to have a Stay positive despite
technologies to backup or plan B all risks undertaken
do the work in case of
Inclement power/backdown
Weather interruption
Lack of Safety first;

feedback/resista Constant check on
the weather
nce to change
updates
Show support and
motivation; before

planning the
activity consider
the needs,
interests, and
capacity of the
prospective
audience
Intellectual Property Limited time and Set priorities (what Consistently create
Rights vis-a-vis competing must come first be and incorporate an
Action Research priorities the first) effective learning
Development for (overlapping and development
Araling Panlipunan schedules) Plan according to strategy
Teachers in all Key the approved
Stages Limited budget allocated budget
and training
resources Prepare in advance Creation/
all needed development of
Information resources and training
overload (may materials activity/program
lead to a lack of that always starts
interest Introduce new with the analysis
ideas, exciting,
Poor planning fun, and
and timing educational
concepts Collaboration and
Insufficient Likely Medium cooperation with all
monitoring and Prepare technical working
evaluation of the monitoring and groups and all

implementation evaluation others involved in
of said schedule in the the program
program/activity implementation of
the program
Relying on
technologies to Ensure to have a Stay positive despite
do the work backup or plan B all risks undertaken
in case of
Inclement power/backdown
Weather interruption
Lack of Safety first;
feedback/resista Constant check on
nce to change the weather
updates
Show support and

motivation; before
planning the
activity consider
the needs,
interests, and
capacity of the
prospective
audience
Division Seminar- Limited time and Set priorities (what Consistently create
Workshop on competing must come first be and incorporate an
Pedagogy and priorities effective learning

Critical Contents in (overlapping the first) and development
the Senior High schedules) strategy
School HUMSS Plan according to
CORE and Limited budget the approved
Specialized Subjects and training allocated budget
resources Creation/
and Capacity Prepare in advance development of
Building on GAD Information all needed training
and Celebration of overload (may resources and activity/program
Woman’s Month lead to a lack of that always starts
materials
focus on Mental
interest with the analysis
health and other Introduce new
related woman’s Poor planning ideas, exciting,
issues and timing fun, and
educational Collaboration and
Insufficient concepts cooperation with all
monitoring and technical working
Likely Medium
evaluation of the Prepare groups and all
implementation monitoring and others involved in
of said evaluation the program
program/activity schedule in the
implementation of
Relying on the program
technologies to Stay positive despite
do the work Ensure to have a all risks undertaken
backup or plan B
Inclement in case of
Weather power/backdown
Lack of interruption

feedback/resista Safety first;
nce to change Constant check on
the weather
updates
Show support and

motivation; before
planning the
activity consider
the needs,
interests, and
capacity of the
prospective
audience
Pagtuturo ng Delay of the Likely High Submission of Close coordination

Filipino Tungo sa NEAP NEAP HRD L&D with other program
Paglinang ng Recognition Documents (a owners on the
Komunikatibong (REC) and proposal, Form arrangement of
Kasanayan Approval (RAC) R.1, Budget activity schedule
process Matrix, CV, etc.)
earlier than the
deadline set by RO immediate
9 coordination with
other learning
facilitators to deliver
the assigned

Very likely High rescheduling the session
activity so as not
Conflict of CID to compromise
activity schedule other important
CID activities
Very likely Very high

resource preparation of a
speaker’s sudden pool of reserved
resource
refusal to deliver
his/her session speakers/learning
due to urgent facilitators
and valid
reasons
SCHOOL GOVERNANCE & OPERATION DIVISION (SGOD)
DISASTER RISK AND REDUCTION MANAGEMENT
Project SSeCure Absence or Very Likely High Division Office None

Schools: Safe, limited allocation shall ensure
Secure and Resilient of funds for allocation of
Schools DRRM PAPs at budget/funds;
the division office
Consider other
funding sources

(e.g. SEF, Private
Institutions, etc.)
Absence or Likely High DRRM PAPs shall None

limited allocation be integrated into
of funds for the SIP & AIP;
DRRM PAPs at
the school level Consider other
funding sources
(e.g. SEF, Private
Institutions, etc.)
Unavailability of Likely Medium Division Office Assign substitute

School DRRM shall monitor and teacher for
Coordinators synchronize participating
during school activity schedules teacher-SDRRMCs
days for different
functional units
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Construction of Limited support Likely Medium The division office Ensure the
School Buildings of the CO/LGU and/or schools presence and
and other facilities and other shall inform ahead support of the office
stakeholders in of time of the concerned/
the office/ potential potential
stakeholder's

implementation concern on the stakeholders
needed assistance
in the
implementation
Repair of School Limited support Likely Medium Formulate an Request full support
buildings/classroom of the CO/LGU action plan to of the Local School
s and other facilities and other ensure smooth Board
stakeholders in implementation of
the the identified
implementation projects.
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVEL OPMENT
Conduct Various Failure to Likely High The proponent of Open line

SDO Training provide HRD various programs communication with
with the should inform proponents with the
schedule 2-3 HRD to prevent desired date of
days before the overlapping activities.
activity. schedules.
Enrollment in Non-availability Likely Medium Scholarship School Heads must

various scholarship of scholars' data enrollment must furnish the list of
programs who registered be coordinated by teachers who are
online HRD Section engaged in
scholarships to the

HRD Section
Utilization of HRD, Failure to Likely High Inform the Chiefs Constant

OPDNTP Funds provide HRD that HRD Funds monitoring of the
with the are for activities programs that use
programs being only whose these funds
utilized by these participants are
funds. teaching and
teaching related
positions, and
OPDNTP for
Non=Teaching
RESEARCH AND PLANNING
Technical assistance Low participation Likely Medium Mandate the Provide incentives
in research of personnel in conduct of for those conducting
conducting research to research
research relevant personnel
Technical assistance Inaccurate data Likely Medium Set the deadline Provide alternative
to DEDP, AIP, SIPs and delayed and enforce methods of
submission of submission submission (e.g.
outputs Google drive, links,

etc.)
Enhanced Basic Incomplete and Likely Medium Gather data from Triangulate data
Education inaccurate data correct/proper with other sources
Information report from the system sources and/or and higher
generation (as and from various data already governance levels
inputs to plans: units verified by higher (RO, CO)
DEDP, AIP, SIPs) governance levels
(RO, CO)
Learner’s The low Likely High Intensive Constant

Information System percentage of monitoring of the convergence and
(LIS) Implementation participation in schools’ and follow-ups with
schools and learning centers’ School LIS
learning centers participation Coordinators,
School Heads, and
ALS implementers.
Preparation of Non-availability Likely Medium Request for the Conduct a manual

education statistics of processed data generation of all computation for
as inputs to DEDP education education statistics
and AIP statistics from the that are unavailable
Central Office for generation from
ahead of time or the system or CO.
before the
schedule of the
crafting of the

division’s DEDP.
Enhanced Basic Incomplete and Likely High Conduct Validate all school
Education inaccurate data orientation on how profiles before final
Information System submitted in the to accomplish the submission
Implementation system through data-gathering
the data forms correctly
gathering forms and provide
(GESP, GJHSP, technical
GSHSP, and assistance, if
PSP) necessary
SCHOOL HEALTH AND NUTRITION
WinS (WASH in Insufficient Likely Medium -Proper -Proper

Schools) school facilities coordination with coordination with
(toilet and SDO for the SDO for the
handwashing allocation of allocation of
facilities, waste additional funds additional funds
segregation and
disposal) -Strengthen -Strengthen
linkages to linkages to
stakeholders stakeholders
Adolescent Conflict of Likely Medium Proper Schedule meetings

Reproductive Health schedule for coordination with
(ARH) training and focal persons,
forums. division office, and
stakeholders
Mental Health Insufficient Likely Medium Regular follow-up Regular follow-up

guidelines from and coordination and coordination
CO and RO on with Regional with Regional Office
the program Office
Lack of funds to Very likely High Partnership with Resort to activities

conduct other agencies that do not
activities necessitate financial
requirements.
National Drug Lack of funds to Very likely High Partnership with Resort to activities
Education Program conduct other agencies that do not
(NDEP) activities necessitate financial
requirements.
Medical, Nursing, Conflict of Likely Medium Proper planning of Rescheduling of

and Dental Services activities. Activities activities
Dental Services Low dentist to Very likely High Partnership with Partnership with
learners ratio the Philippine the Philippine
Dental Association Dental Association

(PDA) and other (PDA) and other
stakeholders. stakeholders.
School-Based Inefficient Likely Medium Intensify BAC Regular

Feeding Program suppliers process coordination with
suppliers; Refer to
SDO and Central
Office
Delayed schedule Likely Medium Proper Regular

of delivery due to coordination with coordination with
bad weather and suppliers, focal suppliers, focal
transportation persons, and LGU persons, and LGU;
Refer to SDO and
Central Office
Spoilage of food Likely Medium Proper Regular

commodities due coordination with coordination with
to weather and suppliers, focal suppliers, focal
expiration persons, and LGU persons, and LGU;
Refer to SDO and
Central Office
SCHOOL MANAGEMENT MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Conduct Orientation No available fund Likely High Ask for fund Tie up with other

on DepEd allocation for the allocation for the functional divisions
Guidelines for conduct of the conduct of the of the SDO for the
Private and Public training. training. inclusion of their
Schools training.
Implementation of Implementation Likely Medium Conduct School Public Schools

quality assurance of quality visits and provide District Supervisors
processes on School assurance TAs to school and SMM&E should
Planning, School processes on heads/focal have open
Based Management School Planning, persons with communication with
(SBM), School School Based Public Schools School Heads/Focal
Governance Council Management District Persons
(SGC), Basic (SBM), School Supervisors
Education Governance
Monitoring and Council (SGC),
Evaluation Basic Education
Framework Monitoring and
(BEMEF), and Evaluation
Implementation of Framework
Programs and (BEMEF), and
Projects as a basis Implementation
for Continuous of Programs and
Improvement Projects as a
basis for
Continuous
Improvement

Gathered data as the Failure to gather Likely Medium Technical Inform the Chiefs
basis for the M&E complete data as Assistance to and District
report on the the basis for the schools and Supervisors of the
performance of the M&E report. Learning Centers timely submission of
Schools Division. and submit reports data for the M&E
to be able to report.
identify areas for
improvement.
Validation of Failure to Likely Medium Calendar SMM&E NONE

documents of validate activities to avoid
schools requesting documents of overlapping related
for Government private schools activities.
Permit to requesting for
Operate/Recognition, Government
Special Order, Permit to
Tuition Fee Increase, Operate/Recognit
and Certificate of ion, Special
Good Standing. Order, Tuition
Fee Increase,
Certificate of
Good Standing.
SOCIAL NETWORKING AND MOBILIZATION
Brigada Eskwela Limited support Likely Medium The division office Ensure the
Implementation of the and/or schools presence and

stakeholders in shall inform ahead support of the
the the potential internal
implementation stakeholders of the stakeholders
needed assistance
in the
implementation
Parents-Teachers Inactive Very Likely Medium Officers must be PTA Coordinators

Association participation of capacitated on may constantly
the officers their roles and remind the officers
functions. Also, of their plans and
formulate an projects. Request
action plan to support from other
ensure PTA Officers from
participation in the Homeroom and
lined projects/ Grade Level.
activities.
Stakeholders No offered Likely Medium Contact Constant

Convergence support and stakeholders convergence with
assistance to meeting/conferenc stakeholders.
education e to present the
support needed.
Also, initiate Prepare project
stakeholders’ proposals to avail
appreciation day/ the support of
various

summit to stakeholders.
recognize their
support.
YOUTH FORMATION
Implementation of Limited to no Very likely High Allocation of None

mandated Youth funds allocated funds by the
for the
Formation Division Office
implementation
Programs (Student of mandated through MOOE
Government Youth Formation and SEF;
Program, Barkada Programs. establish
Kontra Droga, and partnerships with
YES-O) other agencies.
*conduct capacity
building
*provision of
technical assistance
*monitoring
and
evaluation

Not allowing Very likely High None because of Conduct activities
student leaders the directive from on a Saturday
and teacher- the CO
advisers to be
disrupted during
school hours
OFFICE OF THE SCHOOL DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT (OSDS)
LEGAL SERVICE
ICT SECTION
No access to Very Likely High Installed data Contract with the

different IT cabinet with service provider,
Division’s computer Systems like advanced end- manpower,
equipment, network, servers, email point protection, technical expertise,
and internet systems, and firewall, an and maintenance
infrastructure system advanced network, procedure is under
information. and internet warranty.
equipment.
Dissemination of Very Likely High Service contract Procure with a local

Division Fiber breaks and with the internet supplier
Memorandum, other internet- provider
Advisories, and related issues
Announcement to all

schools or teachers
via email and
website
Submission of Very Likely High Service contract Procure with a local

No access to the
reports from Schools with the internet supplier
Server or Data
to the Division Office provider
Cabinet located
using a Document
in the division
Tracking System
office
(DTS)
BUDGET OFFICE
Budget Preparation The proposed Likely High Implement full

increase will not obligation of all
be followed or be current PPA to
decreased prevent a decrease
in next year’s
budget
Budget Execution Mismanagement Unlikely Low Issuance of

of allocation of Certification of
received GAA Availability of
and special funds for every
allotment request

Budget Internet Likely Medium Provide internet
Accountability and Connection backup
Reporting
Budget Monitoring Slow processing Very Likely High Weekly monitoring Detailed tracking of
and Evaluation of procurement with an end user procurement
of the unobligated documents
balances of each
program
ACCOUNTING SECTION
Monthly
Timely remittances
Penalty for late monitoring of Letter for penalty
of BIR withholding
remittances and remittances and exemptions and
taxes, PhilHealth Unlikely Low
unremitted payment thereof submission of
Premiums, and Pag-
premiums before the required documents
Ibig Premiums
deadlines
Utilization of Notice Completeness of Coordinate with

Lapsed NCA due
of Cash Allocation supporting Supply Office for
to slow
(NCA) credited Unlikely Low documents and due and
processing of
quarterly to fast processing for demandable
valid claims
depository bank valid claims obligations

Late submission
of financial
reports from
Implementing
Daily encoding of Set deadline for
Units (IUs) for
correct accounting SDO consolidation;
Accurate and timely consolidating FS
Likely Medium entries to GAFR; Proper safekeeping
financial reports reports; Errors of
daily backup of of backup hard
accounting
GAFR to hard drive drive
entry;
Accounting
system
malfunction
Daily encoding of Accuracy of

Unreconciled correct accounting accounting entry;
Reconciled bank and
book and bank Unlikely Medium entries to GAFR; Proper safekeeping
book records
records daily backup of of backup hard
GAFR to hard drive drive
No submission of Fast processing of

Update and
billing for salary transactions and
reconcile records
Updated provident deductions to daily updating of
Unlikely Low vis-à-vis documents
loan balances Region and records; Timely
provided by the
Implementing submission of
provident loan
Units billing
PERSONNEL/HRM OFFICE

Full implementation Absence of Likely High Scout personnel
of UMIS personnel who who are IT experts
will focus on the
creation of the
system
Internet Unlikely Low

connection
Full implementation Internet Unlikely Low

of the Payroll System Connection
The Likely Medium Provide and

implementation comply with all the
is contingent on requirements
the issuance of a needed for the
regional transfer of payroll.
order/memo on
the transfer of
the payroll
process to the
divisions
Quality Assured Changes in Unlikely Low Keep updated on Note the changes
Manual of Operation DepEd issuances and prepare for
guidelines

involving another version
Personnel
Administration
and Other
Personnel
Actions
SUPPLY OFFICE
Inventory of Absence of Likely High Inventory Inventory

Properties personnel who Committee Committee
will focus on the members must members must
inventory as the concurrently concurrently
Guidelines on perform tasks perform tasks
Inventory state originally assigned originally assigned
that the to them under to them by virtue of
Inventory their positions and their positions and
Committee must the tasks the tasks
be given enough subsequently subsequently
time to focus on assigned to them assigned to them as
the inventory as members of the members of the
itself; yet Inventory Inventory
circumstances Committee Committee
do not allow
since nobody will
assume the
tasks originally
assigned to the

Inventory
Committee
members
Provision of supplies Lack of funds for Almost certain Extreme Procure supplies Procure supplies
and materials to the procurement and materials in and materials that
schools, learning of supplies and the first quarter of are of immediate
centers, and SDO materials in the the year need only
later quarters of
the year
RECORD SECTION
Effective flow of Interruption or Likely Low Need help from IT Communications

Communication slow internet for checking are sent through
throughout the connection messenger or group
division chats.
CASH SECTION
Monthly cash
balance per bank
Regular Review of versus book
the proof list from monitoring and
GSB Lapsing of Cash Unlikely Low reconciliation

Compare the
The wrong generated proof list Contact persons
person is being with the actual concerned and
downloaded Likely Low payroll correct the damage
Solicit feedback from

creditors as to the
timeliness of Call the attention of
Timeliness of Fast processing of
payment in Likely Medium personnel who
payment transactions
accordance with the causes the delay.
DTS of the Division
office.
GENERAL SERVICE SECTION
Number of Unavailability of Likely High Present to the

Stockroom to be Budget Schools Division
constructed Superintendent
regarding Budget
Allocation
No Likely High
Space/Location

VIII. INDICATIVE TIMELINE
To ensure timely implementation of the proposed strategies and

interventions in the next six years, below is the indicative timelines that
specify the specific period of implementation of the programs.
Strategies/Interventions 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028

GOAL 1: Capacitating teachers and instructional leaders toward child-centered
instruction anchored on curriculum standards
Strategy 1: Strengthen the competence of teachers and instructional leaders along the
professional standards for teachers and school heads across career stages toward the
achievement of National Achievement Test performance indicators and targets.
Interventions:
Number of schools and
learning Centers will be
Provided with technical 48 48 48 48 48 48
schools schools schools schools schools schools
assistance on the
and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31 and 31
development, production, learning learning learning learning learning learning
storage, and distribution centers centers centers centers centers centers
utilization of Learning
Materials - EPS LR
CID Proposed trainings
under HRTD Funds with
NEAP Recognition 15 16 17 18 19 20
Certificates (Program
Coordinator/Owner)
School heads and teachers
upskilling of Inclusive 240 240 240 240 240 240
Education and special Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers
curricular programs (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers
implementation (Program school) school) school) school) school) school)
Coordinators
GOAL 2: Empowering learners to become active agents of nation-building.
Strategy 1: Strengthen the capacity of instructional leaders and teachers to provide a
learning environment that is safe and conducive for learning and promotes the rights,
well-being and protections of learners.
Teachers and School Heads
will be provided with
Technical Assistance in the 240 240 240 240 240 240
Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers Teachers
effective management of (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers (5 pers
Learning Assessment for school) school) school) school) school) school)
better learning outcomes
(PSDS and EPS)
GOAL 3: Reaching out to all school-age children, out-of-school youth, and adults for
access to relevant basic learning opportunities.
Strategy 1: Improve access to early childhood education through universal kindergarten.
Strategy 2: Improve access to learners in the key stages of the K to 12 Basic Education
Program.
Implementation of quality 48 48 48 48 48 48
assurance processes on: Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools,

School Planning, School and and and and and and
Based Management (SBM), LC's LC's LC's LC's LC's LC's
School Governace Council (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
(SGC), Basic Education
Monitoring and Evaluation
Framework (BEMEF) and
Implementation of
Programs and Projects as
basis for Continous
Improvement
Implementation of process 48 48 48 48 48 48
for monitoring and Public Public Public Public Public Public
evaluating the organization Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools, Schools,
effectiveness of the schools and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's and LC's
division office (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%) (100%)
Strategy 3: Resourcing
Conduct Advocacy 1 1 2 2 3 3
campaigns to stakeholders
to support basic education.
Strategy 4: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SMN)
Action Research on factors 1 1 2 2 3 3
contributing to successful
participation
GOAL 4: Allocating the best available resources according to learners’ needs.
Strategy 1: Strengthen the capacity of schools to ensure that enrollees at the beginning
grade or year in a given school year reached the final grade or year of the elementary or
secondary level (CSR).
Strategy 2: Budgeting
Interventions
Properly manage the
allocation of the budget
from General Appropriation 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Act (GAA) and the special
allotment received
Fully utilized current GAA
allotment and forwarded
99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%
unobligated balances
(continuing) including Ius

IX. APPENDICES
PERSONNEL SECTION
DIPOLOG CITY DIVISION
Title: Full implementation of UMIS
Core Process 4 - Information
Core Process 1 - Establishment of Core Process 2 - Data Collection and
Core Process 3 - Data Analysis Dissemination, Reporting, and
Purpose and Scope Management
Utilization
Data
Respo
Colle Respo User(s) Freq Audi Commu
Data nsible
Objecti ction nsible Schedule/ and uenc ence nication
Indi Description analys office Reporting
ve Indic Meth Office Frequency use(s) Indic y of Indic of strategie
cato of is to for schedule/f
Statem ators od/ in data in data of data ators data ators M&E s to be
rs Indicators be data requency
ent Data Collect collection collect analy resul employe
used analys
Sour ion ed sis ts d/ used
is
ce
Goal Mainta 100% It contains Repo PERSO ANNUALLY PERSO - Quant - - - - - An
ined of personal in rts, NNEL NNEL itative HRMO Annu SDO Confere nu
an data formation Perso SECTI SECTI and s, al Exec nces, al-
update and of nal ON ON Qualit om, Evaluati
d and record personnel Data HRMO ative RO on and
accura s are and use in Infos AND HRM Worksho
te availa gathering STAFF Os ps
Huma ble relevant , HRD,
n (soft/ data CID,
Resour hard SGOD,
ce copy) TOP
Inform MGT
ation
Manag
ement
Syste
m
Outc Profilin Gener It refers the Repo PERSO ANNUALLY PS/HR
omes g of ated detail rts NNEL D/
Emplo data information SECTI TOP
yees, from generated ON MGT
Quick PDS from PDS
and of all
access perso
on nnel
data
needed
for
trainin
gs, for
reporti
ng,
etc.
Outp Gener 100% Refers to From PERSO
ut 1 ated of the field NNEL
PDS perso percentage office SECTI
and nnels’ of PDS of to ON
other PDS all division assig
person are personnel ned
al data posted posted in Admi
reports in the the system n
syste Offic
m ers II
and
Perso
nnel
Secti
on
staff
Activi Identif IT Refers to Scou HR
ty 1 y perso the ting person
person nnel; personnel of IT nel
nel in- IT incharge exper
charge the system ts or
in the expert IT
creatio s perso
n and Refers to nnel
updati the
ng of percentage
UMIS of Admin
100% Officers II
Submi perso responsible
ssion nnel in the
of PDS teachi collection
to the ng, and
assign teachi submission
ed ng- of PDS
Admin relate
Officer d, and
s for non-
School teachi
s and ng
to perso
Person nnel
nel
Sectio
n for
divisio All
n Admin
person officer
nel s II
and
Proper Perso
Orient nnel
ation Sectio
of n Staff
Admin are
Officer traine
s II d

and
Person
nel
Staff
in
operati
ng
UMIS
LEGAL SECTION
Goal: To provide effective legal services to the Division
Utilization
Data Resp Sched Use Resp Comm
Aud Repo
Collec onsib ule/ r(s) Data onsib Freq unicati
Descr ienc rting
Obje tion le Frequ and anal le uen on
iption Indi Indi Indi e of sched
ctive Metho Offic ency use( ysis office cy of strategi
Indicators of cato cato cato M& ule
State d/ e in in s) of to for data es to be
Indic rs rs rs E / fre
ment Data data data data be data anal employ
ators resu quen
Sourc Colle collect colle used analy ysis ed/
lts cy
e ction ion cted sis used
Goa 1. 100% of All Results Legal Annual Legal Quant Legal Annua - Discip Annual Annual
l Provide received valid Evaluati Officer Office itative Officer l lining Meeting
imparti valid admini on, r, Analys Autho
al, complaints strative Docume Discip is rity
eviden are acted complai nts lining
ce- upon nts are Review, Autho
based acted Progress rity
and upon Reports,
speedy within
investi the
gation period
provide Annual Annual
Utilization
Aud Repo
Descr ienc rting
ators resu quen
lts cy
d by Legal Quant Legal Annua SDO EXECOM
the Officer itative Officer l Execo
Rules Analys m
Number of Results Legal is
legal Evaluati Office
advices/opi Legal on, r,
2. nions/legal service Docume SDO
Provide lectures s nts Execo
effectiv rendered vs provide Review, m
e and number of d are Progress
efficien incoming depend Reports,
t in- requests ent Activity
house upon Impleme
general the ntation
legal need of Report
service the
s Divisio
n
person
nel

Utilization
Aud Repo
Descr ienc rting
ators resu quen
lts cy
Out 1. Administrati Compla M&E Annual Legal Quant Legal Annua Discip Annual Annual
co DepEd ve ints Reports Legal Office itative officer l lining Meetings
me Person complaints that Officer r, Analys Autho
nel are received by are not Discip is rity
fully the Division in valid lining
aware are in valid form Autho
of DO form shall rity
49, s. not be
2006 conside
red as
“Admin
Compla
ints”
except
when
adopte
d as
“motu
proprio
” by the
discipli
ning
Utilization
Aud Repo
Descr ienc rting
ators resu quen
lts cy
authori
ty
Out 1.Preli # of pending # of PI Monitori Legal Annual Discip Quant Legal Quart Discip Annual Annual
put minary admin Report ng officer lining itative officer erly lining Meetings
1.1 Investi complaints shall be Checklis Autho Analys Autho
gation for depend t rity is rity
Report investigatio ent
n vs PI upon
Report the
submitted request
for
investig
ation
by the
discipli
ning
authori
ty

Utilization
Aud Repo
Descr ienc rting
ators resu quen
lts cy
Acti Trainin 48 schools Refers Activity Legal After Legal, Quant Legal Annua EXEC Meetings Quarte
vity g and to the Impleme officeer activity Discip itative Officer l OM, rly or
1.1. Works numbe ntation impleme lining Analys Discip Monthl
1. hop on r of Report, ntation Autho is lining y
DO 49, recipie Attenda rity, Autho
s 2006 nt/ nce EXEC rity
particip Sheet OM
ating
schools

BUDGET SECTION
Title: Budget Preparation
Core Process- Budget Proposal Preparation
Objective Statement Indicators Description of Indicators
Goal To prepare budget proposal of the Schools Division 100% of data and records are It contains budget allocation indicated from central Office
including proposal on yearly increase of all PAPs available (soft/hard copy) BP Forms Tier 1 and Tier 2
Outcomes To propose increase in budget allocation for the 100% PAPS indicated in Tier 1 Tier 1 were amounts provided by Central Office. Proposed
next year PAPs will be increased increase in amounts of each PAPs will be indicated Tier 2.
Output To generate Tier 1 and Tier 2 Budget Proposal Generated Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tier 1 and Tier 2 will be prepared, approved and Submitted
to Regional Office
Activity Received Tier 1 and Tier 2 Budget Proposal from Budget Officer Tier 1 and Tier 2 will be received every February and to be
Central Office submitted on or before April of the current year
Identify each PAPs indicated in Tier 1 and indicate

proposed increase in amounts in Tier 2
100% PAPs were identified
Assessed previous year’S PAPs budget utilization
rate as basis for your proposal
100% last year’S PAPs were
assessed

Title: Budget Execution
Core Process- Management of Allotment
Objective Statement Indicators Description of Indicators
Goal To properly manage the allocation of the budget from 100% budget allocation were Request received from end user will be reviewed and
General Appropriation Act (GAA) and the special properly managed assessed as to fund source allocation
allotment received
Outcomes To provide Certificate of Availability of Allotment in 100% request were provided Purchase request and other supporting documents will
each request received from end user Certificate of Availability of not continue to process without the Certificate of
Allotment Availability of Allotment
Output To generate Certificate of Availability of Allotment Generated Certificate of Certificate of Availability of Allotment will be approved
Availability of Allotment by Budget Officer and to be attached to PR and other
documents
Activity Received Purchase Request and other attached Budget Officer, ADAS I, ADAS III PR and other documents will be assessed and provided
documents (eg. PPMP, CNAS, Proposal, Sub-aro) with Certificate of Availability of Allotment
PR with Certificate of Availability of Allotment will be

valid for obligation
100% obligation of PR with
Certificates

Title: Implementation of LEAD-Division Reading Program (Literacy Enhancement for Academic Development)

Core Process 1 - Establishment Core Process 2 - Data Collection and
of Purpose and Scope Management
Utilization
Respo Respo
Data User(s) Freq Commu
Descri nsible Data nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti Collecti Schedule/ and uenc Audien nication
ption Office analy office Reporting
ve on Frequency use(s) of y of ce of strategi
of in sis to for schedule/
Statem Method in data data data M&E es to be
Indicat data be data frequency
ent / Data collection collecte analy results employe
ors Collect used analy
Source d sis d/ used
ion sis

NEP NEP NEP NEP
Agenc Agenc Agenc Agency
y y y Indicat
Indica Indica Indica or:
tor: tor: tor: Proporti
Propor Propor Propor on of
tion of tion of tion of learners
Burea
learner learner learner achievi
u of
s s s ng at
Improv a Educa
achievi achievi achievi least
e the portion tional
ng at ng at ng at annu Nearly CID,
literacy of the Assess
least least least ally, Proficie School
rate of populati ment Release
Nearly Nearly Nearly depe nt in Heads,
learner on from (BEA) of
Profici Profici Profici ndin Nationa langua
s in the G3 to and SDO- division annually,
ent in ent in ent in g on l ge
ELLNA G12 Downlo Literac Dipolog memora right after
Nation Nation annually Nation the Achieve teache
(G3) attainin ading of y City, nda the BEA
al al or as al BEA actu ment rs and
and g an ELLNA Coordi EPS in quant through release
Goal Achiev Achiev scheduled Achiev and al Test readin
increas increas and nating Filipino itative the the latest
ement ement by the ement LCC cond (NAT)M g
ed ed NAT Counc & email, results for
Test Test BEA Test uct ean coordi
achieve achieve results il English, Messen ELLNA or
(NAT)M (NAT)M (NAT)M of Percent nators
ment ment (LCC) PSDS ger NAT
ean ean ean the age of
rate in rate in throug group
Percen Percen Percen ELLN Scores SDO-
the NAT the h the chats
tage tage tage A or (MPS) Dipolo
(G3, ELLNA SMME
Scores Scores Scores NAT in the g City
G10, and of
(MPS) (MPS) (MPS) ELLNA
G12) NAT SDO-
in the in the in the for
Dipolo
ELLNA ELLNA ELLNA Grade 3
g City
for for for and
Grade Grade Grade NAT for
3 and 3 and 3 and G6,
NAT NAT NAT G10
for G6, for G6, for G6, and
G10 G10 G10 G12
and and and learners
G12 G12 G12 (Filipino
learner learner learner &
s s s English
(Filipin (Filipin (Filipin )
o& o& o&
Englis Englis Englis
h) h) h)
Elem-
42%
JHS- Elem- Elem-
18 % 42% 42%
SHS- JHS- JHS-
25% 18 % 18 %
SHS- SHS-
25% 25%

The The The
followi followi followi The
ng ng ng followin
percen percen percen g
tage of tage of tage of percent
the the the age of
popula popula popula the EPS
tion of tion of tion of populat and
learner learner learner ion of PSDS
Ensure
SDO- in the
that Increas s are s are s are learners
able to able to Dipolog able to are able ROs
learner ed Release
City and
s are number reach reach Downlo reach to reach of
minim minim Curricu minim minimu SDOs,
able to of ading of DepEd division
lum School
read learners um um reading - um m memora annually,
profici profici and profici BLD proficie Heads,
with ’ assess Burea nda right after
Out Implem ency Langu Langu
minimu attainin ency ency ment u of quant Annu ncy through the BLD
com level level annually entation level age level age
m g at data as Learni itative ally the release
e (instru (instru Division (instru Super (instruc teache
proficie least dissemi ng email, the
ctional ctional , school ctional visors tional rs and
ncy the nated Delive Messen results
heads readin
level in instruct level) level) through ry level) level) at ger
at the at the and at the the end g
their ional email group
reading end of coordi
current reading end of end of of CY chats
CY CY teacher CY 2023: nators
grade level
2023: 2023: s 2023: of
level.
Primar Primar Primar Primary SDO-
y level- y level- y level- level- Dipolo
60% 60% 60% 60% g City
lower lower lower lower
second second second seconda
ary- 45 ary- 45 ary- 45 ry- 45
% % % %

-use of
Google
sheet/f
At At At
orms,
least least least
consolid
2% 2% 2% At least
ation
increas increas increas 2%
Implem forms,
e in e in e in increas
ent the Phil-IRI Divisio
the the the e in the
RAPID tools, n
numbe numbe numbe number
Approa context Readin
r of r of r of of
ch and ualized Semi g
learner learner learner learners
Zeal for reading - Coordi
s with s with s with with Release
Progres Enhanc material annu nators,
instruc instruc instruc instruct of Annually
s in ed s, ally School
tional tional tional ional division after the
Readin implem Learner Semi- EPSs (begi Heads,
and and and and memora division
g where entation s’ annually (Filipino nnin langua
indepe indepe indepe indepen nda consolidat
Project of Reading CID, (beginning & g of ge
Out ndent ndent ndent quant dent through ed reading
LEAD school Progres school of the SY English) CID the teache
put readin readin readin itative reading the reports at
(Literac and s s and 3rd in SDOs SY rs and
g levels g levels g levels levels email, the end of
y division Monitor Quarter of and and school
are are are are Messen the school
Enhanc reading ing the SY) ROs 3rd readin
evident evident evident evident ger year are
ement progra Tool, Quar g
in the in the in the in the group completed
for ms release ter of coordi
Phil- Phil- Phil- Phil-IRI chats
Academ of the nators
IRI IRI IRI posttest
ic memora SY) of
posttes posttes posttes results
Develop nda, SDO-
t t t compar
ment)is corresp Dipolo
results results results ed to
anchor ondenc g City
compa compa compa the
ed. e
red to red to red to pretest
through
the the the data
email,
pretest pretest pretest
group
data data data
chats
and
private
messagi
ng

100 % 100 % 100 %
of of of
school school school 100 %
s in s in s in of
SDO- SDO- SDO- schools
Dipolo Dipolo Dipolo in SDO-
g City g City g City Dipolog EPS in
have have have City Englis Release
number imple imple imple have h and of
Conduc
of mente mente release mente implem Filipin division
t
schools d d of d ented o, memora
various
actively differe differe memora differe differen School nda
reading
particip nt nt nda in nt t Heads, through
activitie EPSs
ating in readin readin emails readin reading langua the
s (Filipino
the g g and g activitie ge email, Annually,
Acti during CID, &
reading activiti activiti group activiti quant annu s teache Messen every 1st
vity the school annually English) CID
activitie es es chats, es itative ally during rs and ger day of
2 celebrat s in SDOs
s during during usi during the school group December
ion of and
suggest the the Messen the whole readin chats,
Buwan ROs
ed by whole whole ger app whole month g submiss
at Araw
the month month or month of coordi ion of
ng
Deped of of phone of Novemb nators Activity
Pagbas
Central Novem Novem calls Novem er to of Complet
a.
Office ber to ber to ber to promot SDO- ion
promot promot promot e love Dipolo Report
e love e love e love for g City
for for for reading
readin readin readin among
g g g learners
among among among .
learner learner learner
s. s. s.

100 % 100 % 100 %
of of of
portion 100 %
school school school
of the of
readin readin readin
populati school
g g g
on of reading
Conduc coordi coordi coordi School
school coordin
t re- nators nators nators Heads,
reading ators Release
orientat and and Division and langua
implem and of
ion of school school conduct Reading school ge
enters school division
Phil-IRI heads heads of Coordin heads annu teache
being heads memora
adminis are are meeting ators, are ally rs and
re- are able nda
Acti tration able to able to / School able to (begi school
oriented quant to through
vity to unders unders CID annually heads unders CID nnin readin annually
on itative underst the
1 school tand tand and tand g of g
reading and the email,
heads the the school the the coordi
policies proper Messen
and proper proper reading proper SY) nators
and way of ger
school way of way of coordin way of of
adminis adminis group
reading admini admini ators admini SDO-
tration tering chats
coordin stering stering stering Dipolo
of the
ators. the the the g City
reading reading
readin readin readin
assess assess
g g g
ment ment
assess assess webinar assess
tools tools.
ment ment ment
tools. tools. tools.

Title: Pagtuturo ng Filipino Tungo sa Paglinang ng Komunikatibong Kasanayan

Utilization
User
Respo Respo
Data (s) Freq Commu
nsible Data nsible Audie
Objectiv Descripti Collectio Schedule/ and uenc nication
Office analys office nce of Reporting
e on of Indica n Frequency use( Indica y of Indicat strategie
Indicators in is to for M&E schedule/
Stateme Indicator tors Method/ in data s) of tors data ors s to be
data be data result frequency
nt s Data collection data analy employe
Collec used analy s
Source colle sis d/ used
tion sis
cted
NEP NEP NEP
NEP NAT
NAT Burea NAT NAT
Agency Divisi
Improve Agenc u of Agenc Agenc
Indicator on
d a portion y Educ y y
: Super Release
learning of the Indica ationa Indica Indica
Proportio SDO visors, of
outcome populatio tor: l tor: tor:
n of - Schoo division annually,
s in n from Propor Asses Propor Proport
learners annually Dipo l memora right after
Filipino G3, G10 tion of Downloa sment tion of ion of
achieving or as log Heads nda the BEA
through and G12 learne ding of (BEA) learne quanti annu learner
Goal at least scheduled City, BEA , through release
teacher attaining rs NAT throu rs tative ally s
Nearly by the EPS Filipin the the latest
professi an achiev results gh the achiev achievi
Proficient BEA in o email, results for
onal increased ing at SMM ing at ng at
I the Filip teache Messeng NAT
develop achieveme least E of least least
Mean ino rs of er group
ment nt rate in Nearly SDO- Nearly Nearly
Percentag SDO- chats
program the NAT Profici Dipol Profici Proficie
e Score in Dipolo
s ent in og ent in nt in
National g City
Nation City Nation Nation
Achievem
al al al
ent Test Achiev Achiev Achiev
(NAT) ement ement ement
Test Test Test
(NAT) (NAT) (NAT)
Elem- Elem- Elem-

42%
42% 42% 42%
JHS- 18 JHS- JHS- JHS-
% 18 % 18 % 18 %
SHS- SHS- SHS- SHS-
25% 25% 25% 25%
Enhanc Proportio At least At Dep
Schoo during the At At least Division
ed n of 75% of least conduct of Ed least 75% of memora
l,
content Filipino Filipino 75% CO,
PSDS, classroom 75%
Quant
Filipino nda sent
knowled Teachers teachers of - use of observatio RO, of teacher through
EPS SDO itative DepE
ge and applying trained Filipin Classroo n for Filipin s emails
Out for , and d RO,
teaching the on o m instructio o IMS- quart trained and
com Filipi Sch Qualit SDO, quarterly
skills of content Filipino teache Observa nal teache CID erly on group
e no ool ative school
Filipino and content rs tion Tool monitoring rs Filipino chats,
analys s
teachers pedagogic and traine (COT) of division traine content provisio
is
in the al skills teaching d on supervisor d on and n of
delivery learned pedagogie Filipin s on the Filipin teachin copies of
of from s have o technical o g COT

instructi training/ attained conte assistance conte pedago rating
on in workshop Very nt and provided nt and gies after
order for s Satisfacto teachi by their teachi have classroo
student conducted ry or ng school ng attaine m
s to Excellent pedag heads on pedag d Very observat
achieve Performa ogies curriculu ogies Satisfa ion is
mastery nce in the have m have ctory done
in delivery attain manageme attain or
commu of ed nt ed Excelle
nicative instructio Very Very nt
compete n in Satisf Satisf Perfor
nce Filipino. actory actory mance
or or in the
Excell Excell deliver
ent ent y of
Perfor Perfor instruc
mance mance tion in
in the in the Filipino
deliver deliver .
y of y of
instru instru
ction ction
in in
Filipin Filipin
o. o.

100 % 100 %
of of
Accompl
school school 100 %
ishment
s in s in of
100 % of Google Report,
SDO- CID SDO- schools
Element schools Form/ sharing
Dipolo EPS Dipolo in
ary & in SDO- Sheet of
g City Progr g City IMS- SDO-
seconda Dipolog (Registra Filipino
have am have CID Dipolog
ry City have tion & SDO training
at Owne at City
Filipino at least 1 Attenda - DepE resource
number of least 1 r Once/ least 1 Quant have at
teachers Filipino nce) SM d RO, s
Out Filipino Filipin During the Filipin itative least 1
trained teacher M& Once SDO, through Annually
put teachers o Training o analys Filipino
on trained E, school google
trained teache Schedule teache is teacher
pedagog on Sch s drive
r r trained
ies in Filipino ool links
traine traine on
teaching content HRD posted
d on d on Filipino
Filipino and QAME SMM in group
Filipin Filipin content
content pedagogie Results E chats
o o and
s for
conte conte pedago
Filipino
nt and HRD nt and gies
teachers
pedag pedag
ogies ogies
At least 1 At Google At At least
Pagtutu Form/ CID Division
training- least 1 least 1 1
ro ng Sheet EPS memora
workshop traini SDO traini trainin
Filipino (Registra for ndum
/webinar ng- - ng- IMS- g-
Tungo Number tion & Filipi DepE dissemi
on works Once/ CID, works Quant CID worksh
sa of Attenda no, d RO, nated
Acti reskilling hop During the SM hop itative op on
Paglinan conducted nce, RO-IX Once SDO, through Annually
vity teachers on Training M& on analys reskilli
g ng training- Pretest/ NEAP Schoo email
on reskill Schedule E, reskill is ng
Komuni workshop Posttest) ls and
pedagogie ing Sch ing teacher
katibong Messeng
s in teache ool teache HRD s on
Kasanay er group
teaching rs on QAME rs on QAM pedago
an chats
Filipino pedag Results pedag E gies in

content is ogies SMM ogies teachin
conducte in E in g
d for CY teachi teachi Filipino
2023 ng ng content
Filipin Filipin is
o HRD o conduc
conte After- conte ted for
HRD
nt is Activity nt is CY
condu Report condu 2023
cted cted
for CY for CY
2023 2023

Title: Upskilling /Reskilling of EPP/TLE/TVL Teachers on the Integration of Technology to Assessment and Pedagogy

Utilization
Resp User
Data Respo
onsib (s) Freq Commun
Descri Collect Data nsible Reportin
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
le Schedule and uenc Audien ication
Objective ption ion analys office g
Office /Frequen use( y of ce of strategie
Statemen of Metho is to for schedule
in cy in data s) of data M&E s to be
t Indicat d/ be data /frequen
data collection data analy results employe
ors Data used analy cy
Colle colle sis d/ used
Source sis
ction cted
Equip
DepEd
EPP/TLE
Profess
/TVL
ional
teachers
Develo
with
pment
knowledg
Prioriti
e and
es for
compete -DM
teache
Goal ncies on 050 s. - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rs and
the 2020
school
Integratio
leaders
n of
for
Technolo
school
gy to
year
Assessm
2020-
ent and
2023
Pedagogy
anchored
on DM
050 s.
2020

EPP/TLE
/TVL
teachers
are
trained
and
equipped
Teacher
with Teacher
s adopt
knowledg s adopt Teachers
96% of and
e and and CID Dep adopt and
the implem
compete impleme (EPS Ed implemen DepEd
teache Refer ent the
ncies nt the in CO, CID t the CO,
rs are to the Teache insights Quanti Annual
that insights TLE/ RO, (EPS insights RO,
Outc traine no. of rs Semi- in ICT tative Annu accompli Once a
enable in ICT TVL) TLE) in ICT SDO,
ome d/equi teache DLL, Annually integrat analys ally shment year
them to integrati schoo school integratio and
pped rs COT, ion in is report
be more on in l heads n in school
with trained assess
compete assessm head assessme s
ICT ment
nt in ent and s nt and
skills and
teaching pedagog pedagogy
pedagog
and y
y
improvin
g the
learning
performa
nce of SDO
the ,
learners and
Sch
ools

98% of
the
98% of
EPP/T 98% of
the 98% of
Capacitat LE/TV the
EPP/TL the
e/Train L EPP/TL Data Dep
Attend CID E/TVL EPP/TLE DepEd
EPP/TLE teache E/TVL were Ed
ance of (EPS teacher /TVL CO,
/TVL rs are teachers collect CO,
the in s are CID teachers RO,
teachers traine are ed RO, Quanti Annual During
teache TLE/ trained (EPS are SDO,
Outp on the d in trained throug tative Annu accompli the
rs TVL) Annually in ICT TLE) trained in and
ut 1 ICT ICT in ICT h the analys ally shment PIR/once
during schoo integrat school ICT extern
integratio integr integrati secret is report a year
the l ion to heads integratio al
n to ation on to ariat
trainin head assess n to stakeh
assessme to assessm (attend
g s SDO ment assessme olders
nt and assess ent and ance)
, and nt and
pedagogy ment pedagog
and pedagog pedagogy
and y
Sch y
pedag
ogy ools
Conduc
Condu Conduct
ted one
cted ed one Conducte
Conduct (1)
one (1) (1) Data d one (1)
seminar- seminar
semin Refer seminar were seminar-
worksho CID -
ar- to the - collect Dep workshop
p on ICT (EPS worksh DepEd
works numbe worksho ed Ed on ICT
integratio in op on CID CO, During
hop on r of p on throug CO, Qualit integratio Annual
n on TLE/ ICT (EPS RO, the mid-
Activ ICT semina ICT h RO, ative Annu n on accompli
assessme TVL) Annually integrat TLE) SDO, year
ity 1 integr r- integrati google analys ally assessme shment
nt and schoo ion on school and PIR/once
ation works on on drive is nt and report
pedagogy l assess heads school a year
on hop assessm deploy pedagogy
to head ment s
assess conduc ent and ed to to
EPP/TLE s and
ment ted pedagog the EPP/TLE
/TVL pedagog
and y to field SDO /TVL
teachers y to
pedag EPP/TL , teachers
EPP/TL
ogy to E/TVL and E/TVL t
Title: Orientation/Capacity building of Secondary Schools on DepEd Order 54, s. 2022 and JDVP Guidelines

Utilization
Data Resp Use Resp Comm
Colle onsib Schedule r(s) onsib Freq unicati
Data Audie Reporti
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Descripti ction le /Freque and le uenc on
Objective analy nce of ng
on of Met Office ncy in use( office y of strategi
Stateme sis to M&E schedu
Indicator hod/ in data s) of for data es to be
nt be result le/freq
s Data data collectio data data anal employ
used s uency
Sour Colle n colle analy ysis ed/
ce ction cted sis used
“Guidelin
Orient/C es on the
apacitate Selection
Secondar of the
y SHS-TVL
DO 054 s.
Schools specializ
Go 2022, DO
on DO ation - - - - - - - - - - - - -
al 040, s.
050 s. ”
2021
2022
and DO “Guidelin
040, s. es on the
2021 Impleme
ntation

Thro
ugh
All
the
secondar Refer to Dep
goog
y schools 14 the 14 CID Ed 14 CID DepE
le 14
are secondary number secondary (TLE CO, secondary Quan (TLE d CO, Annual
drive secondary
Ou oriented schools of schools EPS) RO, schools titativ EPS) RO, accomp
depl Ann schools Once a
tco /capacit were secondar were schoo Annually were e schoo SDO, lishme
oyed ually were year
me ated on orientated y schools orientated l orientated analy l and nt
to orientated/
DepEd /capacitat oriented /capacita head /capacita sis head schoo report
the capacitated
Order ed /capacit ted s SD ted s ls
scho
054, s. ated O,
ol
2022 and
head
Sch
s
ool
Refer to
DepE
the
98% of 98% of d CO,
school CID CID
Secondar 98% of the the SD the 98% of the RO,
heads (TLE Quan (TLE Annual During
y schools secondary secondary O- secondary secondary SDO,
Ou who EPS) titativ EPS) accomp the
were schools schools SM schools Ann schools and
tpu attended schoo Annually e schoo lishme PIR/on
oriented were were ME, were ually were exter
t1 and l analy l nt ce a
/capacit oriented/c oriented/ Sch oriented/ oriented/ca nal
oriented head sis head report year
ated apacitated capacitat ool capacitat pacitated stake
/ s s
ed ed holde
capacitat
rs
ed

Conduct
orientati Conducte Conducte
on/capa d d
Goog
city Conducted orientatio orientatio Conducted
le
building orientation n/capacit n/capacit orientation/
Refer to Driv
to /capacity y building CID SD y building CID capacity DepE During
the e
secondar building of of (TLE O- of Quan (TLE building of d CO, Annual the
orientati depl
Act y schools secondary secondary EPS) SM secondary titativ EPS) secondary RO, accomp mid-
on/capa oyed Ann
ivit on schools on schools schoo Annually ME, schools e schoo schools on SDO, lishme year
city to ually
y1 DepEd DepEd on DepEd l & on DepEd analy l DepEd and nt PIR/on
building the
Order Order 054, Order head Sch Order sis head Order 054, schoo report ce a
conducte scho
054, s. s. 2022 054, s. s ool 054, s. s s. 2022 and ls year
d ol
2022 and JDVP 2022 and 2022 and JDVP
head
and Guidelines JDVP JDVP Guidelines
s
JDVP Guideline Guideline
Guidelin s s
es

Title: Implementation of School Learning Action Cell (LAC)

Utilization
User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Freq Commun
Descri Collect nsible nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objectiv Schedule/ and Data uenc Audien ication
ption ion Office office Reporting
e Frequency use( analysi y of ce of strategie
of Metho in for schedule/f
Stateme in data s) of s to be data M&E s to be
Indica d/ data data requency
nt collection data used analy results employe
tors Data Collec analys
colle sis d/ used
Source tion is
cted

Establis
hing
LAC as
a K to
12 Basic
Educati
on
Program Schoo
-100% -100%
School- l
particip particip -100%
Based heads
ation of ation of particip -
Continui who Attend
the the ation of Dissemi
ng will ance
school school - the nation of
Professi act as and
populat populat Teacher school informati
onal the commi Scho
ion ion s populati on thru
Develop LAC tment ol -
duly duly output on duly the
ment leader form Lear School
substa - LAC substa and -On substan school
Strategy with of the At least ning LAC - -On
ntiated Monito Team ntiated results sched tiated memo,
Goal for the the School once a Acti Team School scheduled
with ring of secret with of uled with group
improve LAC LAC month on and faculty dates
LAC report ariat LAC possible dates LAC chat,
ment of team Leader Cell ICT
propos propos demons proposa bulletin
teaching to and (LAC group
al al tration l board
and imple the )
approv approv teachin approve and thru
learning ment LAC
ed and ed and g d and the
characte the memb
properl properl properly grade
rized by Schoo ers
y y docume leaders
a group l LAC
docum docum nted
of sessio
ented ented
teachers n
who
engage
in
collabor
ative
learning
sessions
and
facilitate
d by the
school
head or
a
designat
ed LAC
Leader
and the
school

-100% Schoo Attend -100% -100%
particip l ance particip particip
ation of heads and ation of ation of
the who commi the the
school will tment school school
populat act as form populat - populati
head to
ion the of the ion Teacher - on duly
work Scho
duly LAC School LAC duly s School substan -
together ol
substa leader LAC Team substa output LAC tiated School
towards Lear
ntiated with Leader secret ntiated and Team with faculty
continu ning
with the and ariat with results and -On LAC DepEd
ously Acti
LAC LAC the SDO- At least LAC of ICT sched proposa CO, -On
Goal improvi on
propos team LAC CID, once a propos possible group uled l RO, scheduled
Outc ng Cell
al to memb EPSs, month al demons Planni dates approve SDO, dates
ome learning (LAC
approv imple ers PSDSs Quarterly approv tration ng Quar d and and
outcome )
ed and ment School , ed and teachin and terly properly extern
s Dep
properl the s School properl g Resea docume al
anchore Ed
y Schoo adopt LAC y Quantit rch, nted stakeh
d on DO CO,
docum l LAC and Team docum ative LIS Schools olders
35, s. RO,
ented sessio imple ented analysi Team adopt
2016
School n ment School s and
s adopt Refers the s adopt impleme
and to the proces and nt the
implem numb ses implem process
ent the er f and ent the es and
process school mecha process mechan

es and s that nism es and ism of
mecha adopt of mecha school
nism of and school nism of governa
school imple Learni - school nce -Annual
Learnin ment ng Assess Learnin council Accompli
g proce Action ment g in their shment
Action sses Cell in tool Action program Report
Cell in and their Cell in ,
their mech progra their projects
progra anism m, progra and
Schools m, of project m, activitie
adopt project school s and project s.
and s and Learni activiti s and
impleme activiti ng es. activiti
nt the es. Action The es.
processe Cell in use of
s and their school
mechani progr Learni
sm of am, ng
School
school projec Action
Report
Learnin ts and Cell
Card,
g Action activit functio
Cell in ies. nality
their assess
program ment
, tool.
projects
and
activitie
s.

Refers
School
to the
s
numb
Schools adopt
er f
adopt and
School school School
and imple
s adopt s that s adopt Schools
impleme ment
and adopt and adopt
nt the the
implem and implem and
processe proces
ent the imple SDO ent the impleme Annual
s and ses DepEd
process ment , process nt the accompli
mechani and CO,
es and proce Scho es and process shment
sm of mecha Planni RO,
mecha sses The ol mecha es and report
school nism SDO- ng SDO,
nism of and use of nism of mechan
Learnin of CID, and and
school mech school school ism of
g Action school EPSs, Quantit Resea extern
Learnin anism Learni Learnin school
Cell in Learni PSDSs ative rch, al
Outc g of ng g governa
their ng , analysi LIS Quar stakeh
ome Action school Action Action nce
program Action School Quarterly s Team terly olders
Out Cell in Learni Cell Cell in council
, Cell in LAC Quarterly Quantit Planni Quar DepEd
put their ng functio their in their
projects their Team ative ng terly CO,
1 progra Action nality progra program
and progra CID, analysi and RO,
m, Cell in assess m, ,
activitie m, AND s Resea SDO,
project their ment project projects
s. project SCHO rch, and
s and progr tool. s and and
Oriented s and OL SMM extern
activiti am, activiti activitie
the activiti &E al
es. projec es. s.
school es. stakeh
100% ts and SDO 100% 100% of Quarterl
heads Data olders
of the activit - of the the y
on the collect
school ies. CID, school school accompli
impleme ed
heads Refers Scho heads heads shment
ntation from
oriente to the ol oriente oriented report
of the
d Schoo d
school assess
l
LAC ment
heads
tool
who
used.
attend
ed the
orient
ed
Condu Conduct
Condu cted ed one
Conduct cted one (1) (1) DepEd
Refers
orientati one (1) orienta Planni orientati CO,
to the
on on orienta SDO tion on ng on on RO, Quarterl
numb
the tion on - the and the SDO, y
Activ er of Quar
school the Quarterly CID, Learnin Resea School and accompli
ity 1 orient terly
LAC School Scho g rch, Learnin extern shment
ation
among LAC ol Action SMM g Action al report
condu
school among Cell &E Cell stakeh
cted
heads school among among olders
heads school school
heads heads

Title: Provision of Technical Assistance of Learning Assessment

Utilization
Use
Data
Respo r(s) Respo
Colle Freq Commu
Descr nsible and Data nsible Audie
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
ction Schedule/ uenc nication
iption Office use( analy office nce of Reporting
Objective Meth Frequency y of strategi
of in s) of sis to for M&E schedule/
Statement od/ in data data es to be
Indica data data be data result frequency
Data collection anal employe
tors Collec coll used analy s
Sour ysis d/ used
tion ecte sis
ce
d
Provided Refer
technical to the
48 School
assistance no. of
Heads
in the SH
and 80%
effective and TA
Goal of
managem teach Form
teachers
ent of ers
were given
Learning were
TA
Assessme given
nt TA

48
school
heads
Refer and
Assist the 48 school 48 school
to the 80% of
school heads and heads and
numb teache
heads and 80% of 80% of Dep
er of rs can
teachers teachers teachers Ed
SH unders
to can can CO,
and tand DepE
understan understan understan RO,
teach and d CO,
d and d and d and
ers imple RO,
implemen implemen implemen IMS, IMS, Quarter
who Quant ment SDO,
Out t best t the best t the best DISS DISS ly
imple TA itative Quar the and
com practices practices practices AND Quarterly TA Form AND accompl
ment Form analy terly best extern
e for in in SCHO SCHO ishment
the sis practic al
designing, designing designing OL OL report
best es in stake
and and and SD
practi designi holder
administe administe administe O,
ces in ng and s
ring using ring ring Sch
learni admini
effective effective effective ool
ng stering
learning learning learning
asses effectiv
assessme assessme assessme
sment e
nt nts. nts.
. learnin
g
assess
ments.
School Refer Data 48
48 school 48 school 48 school DepE
heads and to the collec school
heads and heads and SD heads and d CO,
teachers numb ted IMS, IMS, heads Quarter
80% of 80% of O- 80% of Quant RO,
Out can er of from DISS DISS and ly
teachers teachers CID teachers itative Quar SDO,
put effectively Schoo the AND Quarterly AND 80% of accompl
can can ,& can analy terly and
1 design, l moni SCHO SCHO teache ishment
effectively effectively Sch effectively sis extern
implemen heads torin OL OL rs can report
design design ool design al
t, and use and g effectiv
learning learning learning stake
learning teach form ely
assessme assessme ers assessme assessme design holder
nt nt who nt nt learnin s
can g
desig assess
n ment
effecti
ve
learni
ng
asses
sment
Condu
cted
one (1)
Data LAC DepE
Conduct/ Refer Conduct/ Conduct/
Conduct/ collec sessio d CO,
participat to the participat participat
participat ted SD n RO,
e one (1) numb e one (1) IMS, e one (1) IMS,
e LAC from O- learnin SDO, Annual
Acti LAC er of LAC DISS LAC DISS
session the CID Ann g and accompl
vity session LAC session AND Annually session AND
on SLAC ,& ually assess extern ishment
1 on sessio on SCHO on SCHO
learning termi Sch ment al report
learning n learning OL learning OL
assessme nal ool among stake
assessme condu assessme assessme
nt repor school holder
nt cted nt nt
t heads s
and
teache
rs

Title: Analyze Quarterly Assessment Results

Utilization
User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Frequ Commu
Collect nsible Data nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti Descrip Schedule/F and ency Audien nication
ion Office analys office Reporting
ve tion of requency use( of ce of strategie
Metho in is to for schedule/f
Statem Indicat in data s) of data M&E s to be
d/ data be data requency
ent ors collection data analy results employe
Data Collec used analys
colle sis d/ used
Source tion is
cted
100%
Refer to
of the
Analyz the
school'
ed school’
s
school' s
learnin
s learner’
Goal g -
learnin s
perfor
g perfor
mance
perfor mance
was
mance by
analyze
quarter
d

IMS,
DISS,
and
school
All All Dep All
s will
supervi Refer to supervi Ed supervi All
design DepEd
sors the sors - CO, sors supervis
learnin CO,
and summa and Learne RO, and ors and
g IMS, IMS, RO, Quarterl
school ry school r’s school Quanti school
interve DISS DISS SDO, y
Outc heads school’ heads Perfor heads tative Quar heads
ntions AND Quarterly AND and accompli
ome will s will mance will analys terly will
to SCHO SCHO extern shment
design learner’ design Assess design is design
addres OL OL al report
learnin s learnin ment SDO learnin learning
s the stakeh
g perfor g Tool , g interven
learnin olders
interve mance interve Sch interve tions.
g
ntions. ntions. ool ntions.
needs
in
school
s.
Imple
ment
the Refer to
learnin the
48 48 48 DepEd
g numbe
schools schools schools 48 CO,
interve r of SDO
implem implem Instruc IMS, implem IMS, schools RO,
ntions schools - Quanti
Out ented ented tional DISS ented DISS impleme SDO,
in that CID, tative Mont Monthly
put the the Monito AND Monthly the AND nted the and
school implem & analys hly report
1 learnin learnin ring SCHO learnin SCHO learning extern
to ented Sch is
g g Tool OL g OL interven al
achiev learnin ool
interve interve interve tions. stakeh
e 85% g
ntions. ntions. ntions. olders
acade interve
mic ntions.
perfor
mance
Condu
ct
monthl
y
monito
ring
and
DepEd
evaluat
Quanti CO,
ion of Refer to SDO
48 48 Instruc IMS, 48 tative IMS, 48 RO,
the the no. - Monthly
schools schools tional DISS schools and DISS schools SDO,
Activ learnin of CID, Mont accompli
were were Monito AND Monthly were Qualit AND were and
ity 1 g schools & hly shment
monito monito ring SCHO monito ative SCHO monitor extern
perfor monito Sch report
red red Tool OL red analys OL ed al
mance red ool
is stakeh
and
olders
learnin
g
interve
ntion
progra
m in
school

Title: Retooling of the newly hired teaching and non-teaching personnel to include newly hired school heads assigned in IPEd implementing schools with IPEd
competencies
Core Process 1 - Core Process 4 - Information
Core Process 2 - Data Collection and
Establishment of Purpose and Core Process 3 - Data Analysis Dissemination, Reporting, and
Management
Scope Utilization
Data
Respo Respo
Collec User(s) Freq Commu
Descri nsible Data nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti tion Schedule/ and uenc Audien nication
ption Office analys office Reporting
ve Metho Frequency use(s) y of ce of strategie
of in is to for schedule/f
Statem d/ in data of data data M&E s to be
Indicat data be data requency
ent Data collection collecte analy results employe
ors Collec used analys
Sourc d sis d/ used
tion is
e
To
establi
sh
IPEd
implem
Nation
enting
al
schools
Indigen
as a
ous
structu
-DO 62 Peoples
Goal re for - - - - - - - - - - - - -
s. 2011 Educat
teachin
ion
g the
Policy
IPEd
Frame
compet
work
encies
that
will
provide
a
venue
for
parent
s,
learner
s,
teachin
g and
non-
teachin
g staff,
commu
nity
stakeh
olders,
and
the
school
head to
work
togethe
r
toward
s
contin
uously
improvi
ng
learnin
g
outcom
es
anchor
ed on
DO 62,
s. 2011
Teachi
Schoo
ng and Refers
l
non- to the School School
heads
teachin numbe s s Schools
School are
g r of adopte adopte adopted
s adopt reque
person schools d and d and and
and sted
nel that, implem implem implem
implem to
adopte adopt ented ented ented DepEd
ent the suppl DepEd
d, and the IPEd the the CO,
strategi y the CO, IPEd
implem implem strateg focal, strateg strategi RO,
es, and google RO, Quant focal Annual
ented, ent the ies, altern ies, es, and SDO,
Outc proces drive itative and Annu accompli Once a
and strategi and ate Annually and process and
ome ses of deploy analys altern ally shment year
integra es, and proces focal proces es of IPEd
IPEd ed for is ate report
ted the proces ses of and ses of IPEd implem
compet the focal
learnin ses of IPEd school IPEd compet enting
encies invent
g IPEd compet compet encies schools
in their ory of
insight compet encies encies in their
daily teache
s encies in their in their daily
teachin rs for
gained in their daily daily teachin
g the SDO,
from daily teachin teachin g
IPEd and
the teachin g g
retooli IPEd
retooli g
ng implem
ng of

IPEd enting
compet schools
encies
98% of 98% of 98% of

Data
Oriente the the the
were
d newly newly newly
Refers collect
newly hired hired hired
to the ed
hired teachin IPEd teachin IPEd teachin
School from
teachin g and focal, g and focal, g and DepEd
heads the
g and non- altern non- Quant altern non- CO, Annual
Out who attend SDO- During the
non- teachin ate teachin itative ate Annu teachin RO, accompli
put attende ance Annually (CID), PIR/once
teachin g focal g analys focal ally g SDO, shment
1 d and of School a year
g person and person is and personn and report
oriente partici
person nel are the nel are the el are schools
d/ pants
nel on oriente school oriente school oriented
during
IPEd d with d with with
the
compet IPEd IPEd IPEd
retooli
encies compet retoole compet compet
ng
encies d encies encies
Condu Condu Data Condu Conduc
ct cted were cted ted one
retooli one (1) collect one (1) (1)
ng retooli ed retooli retoolin
Refers IPEd IPEd
on the ng on from ng on g on the
to the focal, focal, DepEd
IPEd the the the IPEd
numbe altern Quant altern CO, Annual During the
compet IPEd attend SDO- IPEd compet
Activ r of ate itative ate Annu RO, accompli mid-year
compet ance Annually (CID), compet encies
ity 1 encies retooli focal analys focal, ally SDO, shment PIR/once
encies of School encies among
among ng and is and and report a year
among partici among newly
newly conduc the the schools
newly pants newly hired
hired ted school school
hired during hired teachin
teachin teachin the teachin g and
g and
g and retooli g and non-
non- non- ng non- teachin
teachin teachin teachin g
g g g personn
person person person el
nel nel nel
Condu Refer
Condu cted (2) to the
ct a semina no. of
semina r IPEd Condu
Data
r- worksh learnin cted (2) Conduc
were
worksh ops on g semina ted (2)
collect
op on the materi IPEd r IPEd seminar
ed
the develop als focal, worksh focal, worksh DepEd
from
develop ment develop altern ops on Quant altern Semi ops on CO,
the SDO- Accompli
Activ ment of IPEd ed ate Twice a the itative ate - the RO, Once a
submi (CID), shment
ity 2 of IPEd learnin during focal year develo analys focal, annu develop SDO, year
tted School report
learnin g the and pment is and ally ment of and
outpu
g materi semina the of IPEd the IPEd schools
t of
materi als to r- school learnin school learning
the
als to IPEd worksh g materia
partici
IPEd implem op to materi ls
pants
implem enting IPEd als
enting school implem
schools teacher enting
s schools

Title: Capacity Building for Science Teachers

Utilization
User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Frequ Audi Commun
Collecti nsible nsible
Object Descrip Schedule/F and Data ency ence ication
on Office office Reporting
ive Indicat tion of Indica requency in use( Indica analysi of Indicator of strategies
Metho in for schedule/f
State ors Indicat tors data s) of tors s to be data s M&E to be
d/ data data requency
ment ors collection data used analy resul employed
Data Collect analys
colle sis ts / used
Source ion is
cted
NEP
NAT Refers
Agency to the
Indicat Proficie
or: ncy of
Impro
Proport Learner
ved
ion of s in
learni
learner terms
ng
Goal s of the - - - - - - - - - - - - -
outco
achievi Mean
mes in
ng at Percent
Scienc
least age
e
Nearly Score
Profici (MPS)
ent in in the
Nationa NAT
l
Achieve
ment
Test
(NAT)
Scienc Proport
Dep
e ion of COT
Ed
Teach Science School Ratin
CO,
ers Teacher g
RO,
enhan s
ced SDO
implem
conten ,
enting CID
t Scho
IBL
knowl Refers ol School
edge, to the Numb Science
impro number er of Departme
ved of The DLL/ nt &
Quanti
pedag Science use of DLP Teachers Dep
tative
ogical Teacher Classr Quarterly/ in adopt or Ed Annual
and
Outc skills s oom During the Scien IMS- Annu implemen RO, accompli
Qualit Annually
ome and implem Observ Training ce CID ally t IIBL SDO, shment
ative
develo enting ation Schedule (IBL- implemen Scho report
analysi
ped a IBL in Tool Based tation of ols
s
positiv their (COT) ) PBL (
e Science SIP/ AIP/
attitud teachin Action
e g Plan
towar
ds IBL
appro
ach in
teachi
ng
Scienc
e.

Scienc 27%
e Refers Google of
Teach to the Form/ Secon
ers in elem & CID dary
Sheet
both second Data EPS Scien
(Regist IMS-
eleme ary collect Progra ce
Numbe ration SDO CID Dep
ntary Science ed m Teach
r & Once/ - Quanti Ed
& teacher from Owner ers After Accompli
Outp Science Attend During the SMM tative RO,
secon s who the ance) and Once Activity shment Annually
ut 1 Teacher Training &E, analysi SDO,
dary particip assess 4% of Report Report
s Schedule Scho s Scho
traine ated ment eleme
trained ol HRD ols
d on the tool ntary
Inquir training used. QAME teach
y- - Result SMME ers
Based worksh s are
Scienc op HRD traine
e d

Teachi
ng
Inquir Google
y- Refers Form/
CID
Based to the Sheet
EPS
Scienc number (Regist IMS-
Progra
e of ration CID
m
Teachi training &
Numbe Owner
ng: - Attend Cond
r of SDO Dep
Traini worksh ance) ucted
conduc Once/ - Quanti Ed
ng- op on one HRD After Accompli
Activ ted During the SMM tative RO,
Works Inquiry (1trai Once Activity shment Annually
ity 1 training QAME Training &E, Analys SDO,
hop - Based ning- Report report
- Result Schedule Scho is QAME Scho
for Approa works
worksh s ol ols
Eleme ch for hop
op SMME
ntary Science
and Teachin HRD
Secon g
After-
dary conduc HRD
Activity
Teach ted Report
ers
Title: Capacity Building for SHS Teachers

Utilization

User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Freq Commu
Descri Collect nsible Data nsible
Objectiv Schedule/ and uenc Audie nication
ption ion Office analys office Reporting
e Indicato Indicat Frequency use( Indicato y of Indicator nce of strategie
of Metho in is to for schedule/f
Stateme rs ors in data s) of rs data s M&E s to be
Indica d/ data be data requency
nt collection data analy results employe
tors Data Collec used analys
colle sis d/ used
Source tion is
cted
NEP
NAT
Refers
Agency
to the
Indicat
Profici
or:
ency
Proporti
of
Improve on of
Learne
d learners
rs in
learning achievin
terms
Goal outcome g at - - - - - - - - - - - - -
of the
s of SHS least
Mean
Learner Nearly
Percen
s Proficie
tage
nt in
Score
National
(MPS)
Achieve
in the
ment
NAT
Test
(NAT)
SHS Proporti Refers The Dep
Quant 100% of
Teacher on of to the use of Schoo Ed
itative SHS DepEd
s SHS numb Classr l Quarterly/ CO, Annual
and Adop( RO,
Outc enhance Teacher er of oom During the RO, COT IMS- Seme accompli
Qualit SIP/ SDO, Annually
ome d s SHS Obser Training SDO Rating CID stral shment
ative AIP/ School
content achievin Teach vation Schedule , report
CID analys Action s
knowled g ers Tool Scho
is Plan
ge, Outstan rated (COT) ol
improve ding Outsta
d COT nding
pedagog Rating in
ical in Conte
skills Content nt and
Knowled Pedag
ge and ogy
Pedagog during
y class
observ
ation
Science Refers Google 27% of

Teacher to the Form/ Seconda
Data CID
s in elem Sheet ry
collect EPS SDO
both & (Regist Science IMS-
Number ed Progra - DepEd
element secon ration Once/ Teacher Quant CID
Out Science from m SM After RO, Accompli
ary & dary & During the s and itative
put Teacher the Owner M& Once Activity SDO, shment Annually
seconda Scienc Attend Training 4% of analys
1 s assess E, Report School Report
ry e ance) Schedule element is
trained ment Scho s
trained teache ary HRD
tool ol
on rs who QAME teachers
used. SMM
Inquiry- partici Result are
E
Based pated s trained

Science the
Teachin trainin
g g- HRD
works
hop
Refers Google
to the Form/
CID
numb Sheet
EPS
Inquiry- er of (Regist IMS-
Progra
Based trainin ration CID
m
Science g- &
Owner
Teachin works Attend
Number
g: hop ance) SDO Conduct
of
Training on - ed one DepEd
conduct Once/ Quant HRD
- Inquir QAME SM (1) After RO, Accompli
Activ ed During the itative
Worksh y- Result M& training Once Activity SDO, shment Annually
ity 1 training Training Analys QAME
op for Based s E, - Report School report
- Schedule is
Element Appro SMM Scho worksho s
worksho
ary and ach E ol p
p
Seconda for
ry Scienc HRD
Teacher e After-
s Teachi Activit HRD
ng y
condu Report
cted
Title: Implementation and Organization of School Sports Club in SDO Dipolog.

Utilization

User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Freq Commu
Descri Collect nsible Data nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objectiv Schedule/ and uenc Audie nication
ption ion Office analys office Reporting
e Frequency use( y of nce of strategie
of Metho in is to for schedule/f
Stateme in data s) of data M&E s to be
Indica d/ data be data requency
nt collection data analy results employe
tors Data Collec used analys
colle sis d/ used
Source tion is
cted

To
Secure
an
environ
ment of
sports
club in
the
school
and
utilize
the
experien
ce of
the
teachers
BEDP –
in the
2030 -
Goal field of - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DO 24
different
s. 2022
sports
disciplin
e
through
training
s, team
manage
ment,
event
plannin
g and
commu
nity
outreac
h to
develop
the
skills of
the
student
s in the
field of
sports,
includin
g the
commu
nity
engage
ment
and
expect a
positive
outcome
in all
sports
club
member
s,
outcome
s
anchore
d on
BEDP
2030-
DepEd
Order
no. 24,
S. 2022.

SPORTS
is part
of the
CO-
CURRIC
ULAR
ACTIVIT
ES – it
is a
curricul
ar
work..
Increa
Increase Increase sed Increase
Increase
d d memb d
Refers d
member member ership data member
to the members
ship ship and collect ship
numb hip and
and and partici ed and
er of Dep participa DepEd Annual
particip particip pation from particip
school Ed tion in CO, accompli
ation in ation in in the ation in
s that CO, school RO, shment
school school school divisio school Quant
organi RO, SDO, sports SDO, report.
Outc sports sports sports n SDO- QUARTER sports itative Annu
zed CID- club and
ome club club club school DSO LY club analys ally
and DSO activities extern
activitie activitie activiti sports activitie is
imple or al
s or s or es or club s or
ment projects. stakeh
projects. projects. project monit projects.
the olders
s. oring
school
commi PERFOR
sports SDO
ttee. MANCE
club. ,
BASE
Scho
MONITO
ol
RING.

Upgra
de
Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade
athleti Upgrade
athletic athletic athletic
c athletic
perform perform perform
perfor performa
ance ance ance
mance nce and
and and and
and competiti
competi competi competi
compe ve
tive tive tive
titive success
success success success
succes for club
for club for club for club
s for teams.
teams. teams. teams.
club
teams.
Produ
Producti Producti Producti
ctive
ve ve ve
impact Producti
impact impact impact
on the ve
on the on the on the
comm impact
commu commu commu
unity on the
nity nity nity
throug communi
through through through
h ty
outreac outreac outreac
outrea through
h h h
ch outreach
program program program
progra program
in in in
m in in sports
sports sports sports
sports and
and and and
and commitm
commit commit commit
commi ent
ment ment ment
tment program.
program program program
progra
. . .
m.

Athleti
Athletic Athletic c Athletic
Athletic
relation relation relatio relation
relations
ship ship nship ship
hip and
and and and and
attachme
attachm attachm attach attachm
nt
ent ent ment ent
between
between between betwee between
the club
the club the club n the the club
members
member member club member
.
s. s. memb s.
ers.
Budgeta Budgeta Budge Budgeta

Budgetar
ry ry tary ry
y
stability stability stabilit stability
stability
and and y and and
and
broaden broaden broade broaden
broadeni
ing for ing for ning ing for
ng for
the the for the the
the club.
club. club. club. club.
Elevat
Elevate Elevate Elevate
e the Elevate
the level the level the level
level of the level
of of of
satisfa of
satisfact satisfact satisfact
ction satisfacti
ion for ion for ion for
for the on for
the the the
memb the
member member member
ers members
s and s and s and
and and the
the the the
the communi
commu commu commu
comm ty.
nity. nity. nity.
unity.

100% 100%
100%
Oriente OF the OF the
OF the
d the school school
school
school heads heads
heads on Quarterl
heads on the on the
the y
on the impleme impleme
impleme accompli
impleme ntation ntation
ntation shment
ntation of of
of Sports report.
of Sports Sports
club
Sports club club
ORIENT
club. ORIENT Refers ORIENT
ED.
ED. to the ED.
numb PERFOR
er of DepEd MANCE
school CO, BASE
s that SDO RO, MONITO
Quant RING
Out organi , SDO – SDO,
SDO - itative Quar
put Organiz Organiz zed Quarterly CID, Organiz CID - and
DSO analys terly Organize
1 ed ed and SCH ed DSO extern
is d sports
sports sports imple OOL sports al
teams
teams teams ment teams stakeh
and
and and the and olders
competiti
competi competi school competi
ons for
tions for tions for sports tions for
members
member member club. member
to
s to s to s to
engage
engage engage engage
in.
in. in. in.
Schedul Schedul Schedul Schedule

ed ed ed d
practice practice practice practices
s and s and s and and
games.. games.. games.. games..

Training Training Training Training,
, and , and , and and
coachin coachin coachin coaching
g for g for g for for
athletes. athletes. athletes. athletes.
Facilitie Facilitie Facilitie Facilities

s and s and s and and
equipme equipme equipme equipme
nt for nt for nt for nt for
sports sports sports sports
activitie activitie activitie activities
s.. s.. s.. ..
Events Events Events

Events
and and and
and
tourna tourna tourna
tournam
ment ment ment
ent
/compet /compet /compet
/competi
itions itions itions
tions for
for club for club for club
club
member member member
members
s and s and s and
and the
the the the
communi
commu commu commu
ty to
nity to nity to nity to
engage
engage engage engage
in.
in. in. in.

Commu Commu Commu
nity nity nity
Commun
overrun overrun overrun
ity
projects, projects, projects,
overrun
such as such as such as
projects,
youth youth youth
such as
sportsfe sportsfe sportsfe
youth
st , st , st ,
sportsfes
youth youth youth
t , youth
camps camps camps
camps or
or or or
caucus
caucus caucus caucus
or sports
or or or
clinic.
sports sports sports
clinic. clinic. clinic.
Conduct Conduct
Conduct Refers Conduct
ed one ed one
ed to the ed one
(1) (1) Quarterl
orientati numb (1)
orientati orientati y
on on er of orientati DepEd
on on on on accompli
the school on on CO,
organizi organizi shment
organizi s that SDO organizin RO,
ng ng report.
ng organi , SDO – g sports SDO,
Activ sports sports Quar
sports zed Quarterly CID, CID- club and
ity 1 club club terly
club and SCH DSO among extern
among among
among imple OOL school al
school school PERFOR
school ment heads, stakeh
heads, heads, MANCE
heads, the and olders
and and BASE
sports school sports
sports sports MONITO
coordin sports coordina
coordin coordin RING…
ator.. club tor.
ator. ator.

Title: Validation of Master Class Program, Quarterly Assessment, and Number of LAC Session Conducted

Management
Scope Utilization
User
Data Respo
Respo (s) Audi Commun
Descri Collect nsible Freque
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti nsible Schedule/F and Data ence ication
ption ion office ncy of Reporting
ve Office requency in use( analysi of strategie
of Metho for data schedule/fr
State in data data s) of s to be M&E s to be
Indicat d/ data analysi equency
ment Collect collection data used resul employed
ors Data analysi s
ion colle ts / used
Source s
cted
100% -Refers
of the to the
48 numbe
Ensur
school r of
ed the
s’ Master
accura
Master Class
cy of
Class Progra
data in
Progra ms,
the
Goal ms is Quarte - - - - - - - - - - - - -
validat rly
ed Assess
1. ment
Master and
Class LAC
Progra sessio
ms n
condu

cted
-DO 8, validat
s. ed
2015
100%
of the
48
school
2. s’
Quarte Quarte
rly rly
Assess Assess
ment ment
results
is
validat
ed
100%
of the
48
school
s’
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
n
condu
cted is

validat
ed
3.
Numb
er of
LAC
Sessio
n
condu
cted
Master . Submi
Class Refers ssion
Progra to the of
ms, numbe Master
100% 100% 100% . 100%
Quarte r of Class
of the of the of the Quantit of the
rly Master Progra
school school School school ative/ schools
Assess Class m, SDO
Outc s’ s’ / s’ Qulitati Annua ’
ment Progra Quarte Annually - School SDO- Meeting Annually
ome Master Master Distric Master ve lly Master
and ms, rly CID
Class Class t Class analysi Class
numbe Quarte Assess
Progra Progra Progra s Progra
r of rly ment
ms, ms, ms, ms,
LAC Assess Result
sessio ment and
n and Numb
condu LAC er of

cted sessio LAC
are n Sessio
accura condu n
te and cted condu
compli validat cted/
ant to ed
the
standa
rds
Quarte Quarte Quarte Quarte
rly rly rly rly
Assess Assess Assess Assess
ment ment ment Semest ment
and and and ral and
Numb Numb SHs Distr Numb Distric (Maste Numbe
Semestral CID Semestral
er of er of PSDSs ict er of t r r of
LAC LAC LAC Progra LAC
sessio sessio sessio m) session
ns is ns is ns is s is
validat validat validat validate
ed ed ed d
Scho Quarte
Quarterly Quarterly
ol rly
100% Refers 100% Submi 100%
of the to the of the ssion of the
Master numbe Master of Master
100%
Class r of Class Master Class
SDO of the
Master Progra Master Progra Class Qualita Progra
EPSs - Master
Outp Class m, Class m, Progra tive Annua m,
& Annual CID Progra School SDO- Meeting Annually
ut 1 Progra Quarte Progra Quarte m, analysi lly Quarte
PSDSs Scho m
ms, rly ms, rly Quarte s rly
ol validat
Asses Quarte Asses rly Assesm
ed
ment rly ment Assess ent and
and Assess and ment LAC
LAC ment LAC Result Session
Sessio and Sessio and is
n is LAC n is Numb validate
validat sessio validat er of d
ed n ed LAC
condu Sessio
cted n
validat condu
ed cted/
Semest
ral
Quarte SHs (Elem & Distric (Maste
CID Semestral
rly PSDSs JHS) t r
Progra
m)
Assess
ment ,
and
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
n
condu Semestral Quarte
Quarterly
cted (SHS) rly
are
accura
te and
compli
ant to
the
standa
rds

Refers
to the
numbe Condu Conduc
r of cted ted
Master validat validati
Class ion of on of
Progra Master Master
ms, Class Class
SDO
Quarte Progra Qualita Annua Progra
Monito Annual - SDO-
rly m tive lly m
Condu ring EPS (Elem CID CID SDO- Meeting Annually
Assess using analysi (Elem using
cted 100% tool &JHS) Scho School
ment the s &JHS) the
of the ol
and Master Master
School
numbe Progra Progra
heads
r of m m
is
Activ LAC Monito Monitor
oriente
ity 1 sessio ring ing
d of
n Tool Tool
the
validat
Monito
ed
ring
100%
Tool
of the
orienta
School
tion on
heads
the
is Semest
use of Semestral
oriente CID PSDSs ral CID Semestral
the (SHS)
d of (SHS)
Monito
the
ring
Monito
Tool
ring
Tool
Quarterly

100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Assesm
ent and
LAC
Session
is
validate
d
2.
Condu
cted
validat
ion of
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Assess
ment
and
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
ns
condu
cted
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
Annua
lly
(Elem
&JHS)
Semest
SDO
ral
-
(SHS)
Master Qualita
Annual SDO-
Class tive
(Elem CID CID
Progra analysi
&JHS) School
m s
Quarte
rly Semestral Scho SDO-
EPS Meeting Annually
Assess (SHS) ol CID
ment
LAC
Sessio
DIMANC
n PSDSs Quarterly Semestral
OM
report
s
Quarterly

Title: Validation of Master Class Program, Quarterly Assessment, and Number of LAC Session Conducted
Management
Scope Utilization
User
Data Respo
Respo (s) Audi Commun
Descri Collect nsible Freque
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti nsible Schedule/F and Data ence ication
ption ion office ncy of Reporting
ve Office requency in use( analysi of strategie
of Metho for data schedule/fr
State in data data s) of s to be M&E s to be
Indicat d/ data analysi equency
ment Collect collection data used resul employed
ors Data analysi s
ion colle ts / used
Source s
cted
100% -Refers
Ensur
of the to the
ed the
Goal 48 numbe - - - - - - - - - - - - -
accura
school r of
cy of
s’ Master

data in Master Class
the Class Progra
Progra ms,
ms is Quarte
validat rly
ed Assess
1. ment
Master and
Class LAC
Progra sessio
ms n
condu
cted
-DO 8, validat
s. ed
2015
100%
of the
48
school
2. s’
Quarte Quarte
rly rly
Assess Assess
ment ment
results
is
validat
ed

100%
of the
48
school
s’
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
n
condu
cted is
validat
ed
3.
Numb
er of
LAC
Sessio
n
condu
cted
Master . Submi
100% 100% 100% Quantit . 100%
Class Refers ssion
of the of the School of the ative/ of the
Progra to the of SDO
Outc school school / school Qulitati Annua schools
ms, numbe Master Annually - School SDO- Meeting Annually
ome s’ s’ Distric s’ ve lly ’
Quarte r of Class CID
Master Master t Master analysi Master
rly Master Progra
Class Class Class s Class
Assess Class m,

ment Progra Progra Progra Quarte Progra Progra
and ms, ms, ms, rly ms, ms,
numbe Quarte Assess
r of rly ment
LAC Assess Result
sessio ment and
n and Numb
condu LAC er of
cted sessio LAC
are n Sessio
accura condu n
te and cted condu
compli validat cted/
ant to Quarte ed Quarte Quarte Quarte
the rly rly rly rly
standa Assess Assess Assess Assess
rds ment ment ment Semest ment
and and and ral and
Numb Numb SHs Distr Numb Distric (Maste Numbe
Semestral CID Semestral
er of er of PSDSs ict er of t r r of
LAC LAC LAC Progra LAC
sessio sessio sessio m) session
ns is ns is ns is s is
validat validat validat validate
ed ed ed d
Scho Quarte
Quarterly Quarterly
ol rly
100% Refers 100% Submi 100%
100%
of the to the of the ssion of the
SDO of the
Master Master numbe Master of Qualita Master
EPSs - Master
Outp Class Class r of Class Master tive Annua Class
& Annual CID Progra School SDO- Meeting Annually
ut 1 Progra Progra Master Progra Class analysi lly Progra
PSDSs Scho m
ms, m, Class m, Progra s m,
ol validat
Quarte Progra Quarte m, Quarte
ed
rly ms, rly Quarte rly
Asses Quarte Asses rly Assesm
ment rly ment Assess ent and
and Assess and ment LAC
LAC ment LAC Result Session
Sessio and Sessio and is
n is LAC n is Numb validate
validat sessio validat er of d
ed n ed LAC
condu Sessio
cted n
validat condu
ed cted/
Semest
ral
Quarte SHs (Elem & Distric (Maste
CID Semestral
rly PSDSs JHS) t r
Progra
m)
Assess
ment ,
and
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
n Semestral Quarte
Quarterly
condu (SHS) rly
cted
are
accura
te and
compli
ant to
the

standa
rds
Refers
to the
numbe Condu Conduc
r of cted ted
Master validat validati
Class ion of on of
Progra Master Master
ms, Class Class
SDO
Quarte Progra Qualita Annua Progra
Monito Annual - SDO-
rly m tive lly m
Condu ring EPS (Elem CID CID SDO- Meeting Annually
Assess using analysi (Elem using
cted 100% tool &JHS) Scho School
ment the s &JHS) the
of the ol
and Master Master
School
numbe Progra Progra
heads
r of m m
is
Activ LAC Monito Monito
oriente
ity 1 sessio ring ring
d of
n Tool Tool
the
validat
Monito
ed
ring
100%
Tool
of the
orienta
School
tion on
heads
the
is Semest
use of Semestral
oriente CID PSDSs ral CID Semestral
the (SHS)
d of (SHS)
Monito
the
ring
Monito
Tool
ring
Tool
Quarterly
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Assesm
ent and
LAC
Session
is
validate
d
2.
Condu
cted
validat
ion of
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Assess
ment
and
numbe
r of
LAC
Sessio
ns
condu
cted
100%
of the
Master
Class
Progra
m,
Quarte
rly
Asses
ment
and
LAC
Sessio
n is
validat
ed
Annua
lly
(Elem
&JHS)
Semest
SDO
ral
-
(SHS)
Master Qualita
Annual SDO-
Class tive
(Elem CID CID
Progra analysi
&JHS) School
m s

Quarte
rly Semestral Scho SDO-
EPS Meeting Annually
Assess (SHS) ol CID
ment
LAC
Sessio
DIMANC
n PSDSs Quarterly Semestral
OM
report
s
Quarterly

Title: Provision of Technical Assistance of Learning Assessment
Utilization
Use
Data
Respo r(s) Respo
Colle Freq Commu
Descr nsible and Data nsible Audie
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
ction Schedule/ uenc nication
iption Office use( analy office nce of Reporting
Objective Meth Frequency y of strategi
of in s) of sis to for M&E schedule/
Statement od/ in data data es to be
Indica data data be data result frequency
Data collection anal employe
tors Collec coll used analy s
Sour ysis d/ used
tion ecte sis
ce
d
Provided Refer
48 School
technical to the
Heads
assistanc no. of
and 80%
Goa e in the SH TA
of
l effective and Form
teachers
managem teach
were
ent of ers
given TA
Learning were

Assessme given
nt TA
48
Dep school
Ed heads
Refer
Assist the 48 school 48 school CO, and
to the
school heads and heads and RO, 80% of
numb
heads and 80% of 80% of teacher
er of
teachers teachers teachers s can
SH SD
to can can underst
and O, DepE
understan understan understan and
teach Sch d CO,
d and d and d and and
ers ool RO,
implemen implemen implemen IMS, Quan IMS, implem Quarter
who SDO,
Out t best t the best t the best DISS titativ DISS ent the ly
imple TA Quar and
com practices practices practices AND Quarterly TA Form e AND best accompl
ment Form terly extern
e for in in SCH analy SCH practice ishment
the al
designing, designing designing OOL sis OOL s in report
best stake
and and and designi
practi holder
administe administe administe ng and
ces in s
ring using ring ring admini
learni
effective effective effective stering
ng
learning learning learning effectiv
asses
assessme assessme assessme e
sment
nt nts. nts. learnin
.
g
assess
ments.
School 48 school Refer 48 school Data 48 school 48 DepE
SD
heads and heads and to the heads and collec IMS, heads and Quan IMS, school d CO, Quarter
O-
Out teachers 80% of numb 80% of ted DISS 80% of titativ DISS heads RO, ly
CID Quar
put can teachers er of teachers from AND Quarterly teachers e AND and SDO, accompl
,& terly
1 effectively can Schoo can the SCH can analy SCH 80% of and ishment
Sch
design, effectively l effectively moni OOL effectively sis OOL teacher extern report
ool
implemen design heads design torin design s can al
t, and use learning and learning g learning effectiv stake
learning assessme teach assessme form assessme ely holder
assessme nt ers nt nt design s
nt who learnin
can g
desig assess
n ment
effecti
ve
learni
ng
asses
sment
Conduc
ted one
Data (1) LAC DepE
Conduct/ Refer Conduct/ Conduct/
Conduct/ collec session d CO,
participat to the participat participat
participat ted SD learnin RO,
e one (1) numb e one (1) IMS, e one (1) IMS,
e LAC from O- g SDO, Annual
Acti LAC er of LAC DISS LAC DISS
session the CID Ann assess and accompl
vity session LAC session AND Annually session AND
on SLAC ,& ually ment extern ishment
1 on sessio on SCH on SCH
learning termi Sch among al report
learning n learning OOL learning OOL
assessme nal ool school stake
assessme condu assessme assessme
nt repor heads holder
nt cted nt nt
t and s
teacher
s

Title: Analyze Quarterly Assessment Results
Utilization
User
Data Respo Respo
(s) Frequ Commu
Indicators Collect nsible Data nsible
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Objecti Descrip Schedule/F and ency Audien nication
ion Office analys office Reporting
ve tion of requency use( of ce of strategie
Metho in is to for schedule/f
Statem Indicat in data s) of data M&E s to be
d/ data be data requency
ent ors collection data analy results employe
Data Collec used analys
colle sis d/ used
Source tion is
cted
100%
Refer to
of the
Analyz the
school'
ed school’
s
school' s
learnin
s learner’
Goal g -
learnin s
perfor
g perfor
mance
perfor mance
was
mance by
analyze
quarter
d
IMS, All Refer to All Dep All All
Ed DepEd
DISS, supervi the supervi - supervi supervis
CO, CO,
and sors summa sors Learne sors ors and
IMS, RO, IMS, RO, Quarterl
school and ry and r’s and Quanti school
DISS DISS SDO, y
Outc s will school school’ school Perfor SDO school tative Quar heads
AND Quarterly AND and accompli
ome design heads s heads mance , heads analys terly will
SCHO SCHO extern shment
learnin will learner’ will Assess Sch will is design
OL OL al report
g design s design ment ool design learning
stakeh
interve learnin perfor learnin Tool learnin interven
olders
ntions g mance g g tions.

to interve interve interve
addres ntions. ntions. ntions.
s the
learnin
g
needs
in
school
s.
Imple
ment
the Refer to
learnin the
48 48 48 DepEd
g numbe
schools schools schools 48 CO,
interve r of SDO
implem implem Instruc IMS, implem IMS, schools RO,
ntions schools - Quanti
Out ented ented tional DISS ented DISS impleme SDO,
in that CID, tative Mont Monthly
put the the Monito AND Monthly the AND nted the and
school implem & analys hly report
1 learnin learnin ring SCHO learnin SCHO learning extern
to ented Sch is
g g Tool OL g OL interven al
achiev learnin ool
interve interve interve tions. stakeh
e 85% g
ntions. ntions. ntions. olders
acade interve
mic ntions.
perfor
mance
Condu
DepEd
ct
Quanti CO,
monthl Refer to SDO
48 48 Instruc IMS, 48 tative IMS, 48 RO,
y the no. - Monthly
schools schools tional DISS schools and DISS schools SDO,
Activ monito of CID, Mont accompli
were were Monito AND Monthly were Qualit AND were and
ity 1 ring schools & hly shment
monito monito ring SCHO monito ative SCHO monitor extern
and monito Sch report
red red Tool OL red analys OL ed al
evaluat red ool
is stakeh
ion of
olders
the
learnin
g
perfor
mance
and
learnin
g
interve
ntion
progra
m in
school

Title: Division Training Workshop in Teaching Grammar Communicatively for English Teachers
Core Process 1 - Establishment Core Process 4 - Information
Co Process 2 - Data Collection and Core Process 3 - Data
of Purpose Dissemination,
re Management Analysis
and Scope Reporting, and Utilization
User
(s
) Respo
Frequ
Data Respo and Data nsi ble
e ncy Commu
Collect nsi ble use( analys office
of nica tion
io n Office s) of is to for
data strategie
Metho in data be data
analy s to be
d/ data colle used analys
sis employe
Data Collec ct is
d/ used
Obje Descrip Source tio n Schedule/F Audien
Reporting
ctive Ind tio n of Indi cat req uency Ind Indi ce of
ed schedule/f
Statem ica tors Indicat ors in data ica tors ca tors M&E
req uency
ent ors collection results
Improv Nation Refers Nation
Goal ed al to the al - - - - - - - - - - - -
learnin Expend Proficie Expend
g it ure ncy of iture
outco Progra Learner Progra
mes in m NAT s in m NAT
Englis terms
h of the
throug Mean
h Percent
teache age
r Score
profess (MPS)
ional in
develo Agency
pment Indicat
progra or: Agency
ms Proport Indicat
io n of or:
learner Propor
s tion of
achievi learner
ng at s
least the achievi
Nearly NAT ng at
Proficie least
nt in Nearly
the Profici
Nation ent in
al the
Achieve Nation
ment al
Test
(NAT)
Achiev
ement
Test
(NAT)
Classr
oo m Dep
School
Observ Ed DepEd
s
at ion RO, RO,
Refers PSDSs
Propo Tool SDO SDO,
Proport to the EPS - Proport
rtion of (COT), ,
i on of numbe i on of
Englis COT Proporti
Englis English r of English Instru
h Rating, on of
h Teache English Teache cti
Teach Numbe English
Teache rs Teache rs onal
ers r of Teacher
rs implem rs implem Manag
imple DLL/ s
unders e implem e e
menti DLP in impleme
tood nting/ en ting nting/ ment
ng/ Englis nting/
differe incorpo / incorpo Sectio
incorp h During the Quanti incorpor
nt r ating incorpo r ating n of Accompli
Outc oratin g incorp Schedule of ta tive Annu ating
aspect differen rat ing differen the sh ment Annually
o me differe or Training / analys all y different
s of t differen t Curric Report
nt ating Quarterly is aspects
teachi aspects t aspects ulu m
aspect the of
ng of aspects Englis Sch of Imple School
s of differe teaching
gramm teachin of h ool s teachin me s
teachi nt gramma
ar g teachin g ntatio
ng aspect r
comm gramm g gramm n
gram s of commu
unica ar gramm ar Divisi
mar teachi nicativel
tively. commu ar commu on
comm ng y.
nicative commu nicative
unicati gramm
l y. nic l y.
vely. ar
atively.
comm
uni
cativel
y
Englis Numbe Refers Numb Google Numbe Instru Number
During the SDO Quanti Accompli
Out h r of to the er of Form/ r of cti of DepEd
CID Schedule of - ta tive sh ment
pu t Junior English Junior Englis Registr English onal Once English RO, Annually
EPS Training SM analys Report
1 High Teache High h ati on/ Teache Manag Teacher SDO,
/Once M is Training
School rs School Teach Attend rs e s
Teache trained English ers an ce trained ment trained Activity
rs (50% of teacher traine Sheets (50% of Sectio (50% of Report
trained English s who d QAME English n of English
on Teache particip Teache the Teacher
teachi rs- at ed rs- Curric s-
ng Junior the Junior ulu m Junior
gramm High trainin High Imple High
ar School g School me School
comm are are ntatio are
unica Progra n
tively Result m Divisi
s Propo &E, on,
trained trained School
ne nt/ Sch HRD trained)
) ) s
Owner ool s
SMME
HRD
Condu Refers Google Instru
ct a to the Form/ cti
divisio numbe Sheet SDO onal DepEd
n r of (Regist CID - Manag
Number RO,
trainin trainin ra tion EPS SM e
of SDO,
g on gs & M ment
Numbe Numb Attend Numbe English Accompli
teachi conduc Sectio
r of er of an ce) Once/ r of Quanti Teacher sh ment
Activ ng ted on n of
conduc condu Progra During the &E, conduc ta tive s Report
it y gramm teachin the Once School Annually
t ed cted m Training Sch t ed Analys trained Training
1 ar g Curric s
trainin trainin Owner Schedule ool trainin is (Trainin Activity
comm gramm ulu m
gs gs gs g Report
unica ar QAME Imple
Activity
tively commu Result me
Report)
for nic s ntatio
Junior atively SMME n
High for HRD Divisi
School Junior HRD on,

Teache High After- HRD
rs School Activit QAME
Teache y
rs Report

Title: Division Training on Literacy Instruction for Untrained English Reading Implementers (Batch 2)
Core Process Core Process 4 -
C Process 2 - Data Collection and Core Process 3 - Data
1 - Establishment of Purpose and Information Dissemination,
ore Management Analysis
Scope Reporting, and Utilization
User
(s
) Respo
Frequ
and Data nsi ble
e ncy
use( analys office
of
s) of is to for
Data Respo data
data be data Commu
Collect nsi ble analy
colle used analysi nica tion
io n Office sis
ct ed s strategie
Metho in
Schedule/ Audie s to be
Descrip d/ data Reporting
Freq nce of employe
tio n of Indi Data Collec schedule/
uency in M&E d/ used
Indicato cat ors Source tio n freq
data result
rs uency
collection s
Objecti
ve Ind Ind Indi
Statemen ica tors ica tors ca tors
t
Improved Nation Refers
Nation
learning al to the
al
outcomes Expend Proficie
Goal Expen - - - - - - - - - - - -
in it ure ncy of
d iture
English Progra Learner
Progra
through m NAT s in
teacher terms of m
professio the NAT
nal Mean
developm Percent
ent age
programs Score
(MPS)
in
Agency
Indicat
or:
Agenc
Proport
y
io n of
Indica
learner
t or:
s
Propor
achievi
the NAT tion of
ng at
learne
least
rs
Nearly
achiev
Proficie
i ng at
nt in
least
the
Nation
al
Achieve Nearly
Profici
ent in
the
ment Nation
Test al
(NAT) Achiev
ement
Test
(NAT)

Untraine
d/d
esignate Refers
Propo
English/ to the
Proport rtion Proport
rea ding number
i on of of i on of Proporti
teachers of
English Englis English on of
in English
Teache h Teache English
elementa Teacher
rs Teach rs Teacher
ry and s
implem ers implem s
secondar implem
e imple e implem
y showed en ting
nting/ menti The nting/ Instruc e
appreciat /
incorpo ng/ use of incorpo ti onal nting/
io n on incorpo
r ating incorp Classr r ating Manag incorpo
the rat ing
the oratin oo m Dep the e ment r ating DepEd
pedagogi the School
pedago g the Observ Ed pedago Sectio the RO,
es and pedagog s During the Quant
g ies pedag at ion RO, g ies n of pedago SDO,
approach ie s and Schedule ita Accompl
Outc and ogies Tool and the Annu g ies
es for the approac of Training tive ish ment Annually
o me approa and (COT), approa Curric all y and
effective he s for / analys Report
c hes appro COT c hes ulu m approac
teaching the Quarterly is
for the aches for the Imple hes for
of effective
effectiv for the effectiv me the
beginnin teachin
e effecti e ntation effective
g reading g of
teachin ve teachin Divisio teachin
and beginni
g of teachi g of n g of
compreh ng
beginni ng of beginni beginni
en sion reading
ng begin ng ng
skills for and
reading n reading reading
learners, compre
and and and
enhance he
compre compre compre
d content nsion
hensio hensio hension
knowledg skills PSDSs SDO School
n ing Rating, n
e; for EPS - , s
learners Numbe
Englis Scho
r of
h ol s
DLL/
DLP in
Englis
h (with
pedago
gi es
and
approa
ch es
for the
effectiv
e
teachi
ng of
beginni
ng
readin
g and
readin
and
g and compre
pedagogi
compr h
cal skills skills skills skills
ehensi ension
on for for for
on skills
literacy learner learner learner
skills for
developm s s s
for learner
e nt in
learne s)
English
r
Numbe Refers Numb Numbe Instruc Number
English r of to the er of Google r of ti onal of
Accompl
both English Junior Englis Form/ English Quant Manag English
During the SDO ish ment
elementa Teache High h Registr Teache ita e ment Teacher DepEd
Outp CID Schedule - Report
ry & rs School Teach ati on/ rs tive Sectio Once s RO, Annually
ut1 EPS of Training SM Training
secondar trained English ers Attend trained analys n of trained SDO,
/Once M Activity
y trained (28% of teacher traine an ce (28% of is the (28% of
Report
on Second s who d Sheets Second Curric Second
a ry particip (28% a ry ulu m a ry
English at ed English Imple English
Teache the Teache me Teacher
r s- - training r s- - ntation s-- HS)
HS) HS) Divisio
on n,
Literacy HRD
Instructi
on for and 5% of and 5%
and 5%
Untraine of Secon of
Progra of
d English elemen dary elemen
m &E, element
Reading t ary Englis t ary School
QAME Propo Scho ary
Impleme teacher h teacher s
ne nt/ ol s teacher
nte rs s are Teach s are
Owner s are
(Batch trained ers- trained
trained)
2), ) HS) )
content
knowledg
e; and
pedagogi Result SMME
and
cal s HRD
5% of
skills on eleme
literacy ntary
developm teache
e nt in rs are
English traine
d)
Conduct Refers Google Instruc
a division Numbe to the Numb Form/ Numbe ti onal Number
Quant
training r of number er of Sheet Once/ SDO r of Manag of
ita DepEd Accompl
Activ on conduc of condu (Regist CID During the - conduc e ment conduct
tive Once RO, ish ment Annually
it y 1 Literacy t ed training cted ra tion EPS Training SM t ed Sectio ed
Analy SDO, Report
Instructi trainin s traini & Schedule M trainin n of training
sis
on for gs conduct n gs Attend gs the s
Untraine ed on an ce) Curric
d English Literacy ulu m
Reading Instruct Imple
Impleme ion for me
nte rs Untrain ntation
(Batch ed Divisio
2), English n,
content Reading HRD
knowledg Implem QAME
Progra &E, Training
e; and ent ers School
QAME m Scho Activity
pedagogi (Batch s
Owner ol Report
cal skills 2),
on content
literacy Result
knowle
developm s
dge
e nt in ; and
English pedagog
ic al
skills
HRD
on
literacy
develop
m ent
After-
Activit
y
Report
SMME
HRD

Title: Capacity Building for Elementary and Secondary Mathematics Teachers
Core Process 1 - Establishment of Core Process 4 - Information
Core Process 2 - Data Collection and Core Process 3 - Data
Purpose Dissemination,
Management Analysis
and Scope Reporting, and Utilization
User
(s
Respo
Frequ
) Data nsi ble
Data Respo e ncy
and analys office Commu
Collect nsi ble of
use( is to for nica tion
io n Office data
s) of be data strategie
Metho in analy
data used analysi s to be
d/ data sis
s employe
Data Collec
Schedule/ Audie d/ used
Objecti Descrip Source tio n Reporting
Freq nce of
ve Ind tio n of Indi colle Ind Indi schedule/
uency in M&E
Statemen ica tors Indicato cat ors ct ed ica tors ca tors freq
data result
t rs uency
collection s
Refers
Improved
to the
learning
Proficie
outcomes
ncy of
in
Learner
Mathema
s in
tics
NEP terms of
Goal through - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NAT the
teacher
Mean
professio
Percent
nal
age
developm
Score
ent
(MPS)
programs
in

Agenc
y
Indicat
o r:
Proport
io n of
learner
s
achievi
n g at the NAT
least
Nearly
Profici
e nt in
Nation
al
Achieve
ment
Test
(NAT)
Mathema School
Refers Propor
tics Proport Math
to the tion of
Teachers io n of Depart
number Math
enhance Math m ent &
of Math Teach The Quant
d content Teache Teacher
Teacher ers use of ita
knowledg rs s adopt
s imple Classr Quarterly/ tive Annual
e, implem or DepEd
Outc implem menti oo m School During the and IMS- Annu accompli
improved e nting COT implem RO, Annually
ome ent ing ng Observ CID Training Qualit CID all y sh ment
pedagogi Innovat e nt SDO,
Innovati Innov ati on Schedule ati ve report
cal skills i ve innovati
ve a tive Tool analys
and Teachi ve
teachin Teachi (COT) is
develope ng teachin
g ng
da Strateg g
strategi Strate
positive ie s strategi
es gies
attitude e s in
towards SIP/
innovativ AIP/
e SDO Action School
Rating
teaching , Plan s
strategie Scho
s ol
Numbe
r of
DLL/
DLP in
Science
(IBL-
Based)
40% of
Select Refers Second
Math to the ary
Registr
Teachers elem & SDO Math
Data a tion DepEd
in both Numbe sec CID - Teache
collec & RO,
elementa r of Math EPS SM r s and
ted Attend Quant SDO,
ry & Elem & teacher Once/ M 5% of
from a nce it IMS- After Accompl
Out secondar Sec s who during the elemen
the t ary ative CID Once Activity is hment Annually
put 1 y trained Math particip training
asses teacher analys HRD Report Report
on Teache at ed schedule
sment is
innovativ rs the Progra &E,
tool s are School
e trained training m Scho
used. trained s
teaching - Owner ol
strategie worksh QAME
s op Result SMME
s HRD
Refers Registr Quant
Capacity- Numbe Once/ SDO IMS-
to the a tion Condu it After DepEd Accompl
Activ Building r of CID During the - CID
number & c ted ative Once Activity RO, is hment Annually
ity 1 of Elem conduc EPS Training SM HRD
of Attend one (1) Analy Report SDO, report
& Sec t ed Schedule M QAME
training a nce sis

Math trainin on Progra &E,
trainin School
Teachers g innovati m Scho
g s
ve Owner ol
teachin QAME -
g Result worksh
strategi s op
es SMME
HRD
HRD
After-
Activit
y
Report
Title: Implementation of School Governance Council

Core Process 1 - Establishment of Core Process 2 - Data Collection and Core Process 3 - Data
Dissemination,
Purpose and Scope Management Analysis
Reporting, and Utilization
Resp
Resp Freq Comm
User(s) on
Data on Schedule Data u Audie uni
and sible Reportin
Objecti Descriptio Collectio sible /Fr analy ency nc e of cation
use(s) office g
n Office equency sis to of M&E strategi
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
ve n of for
of data schedul
Stateme Indicator Method/ in in data be data result es to be
collect data e/fr
nt s Data data collection used anal s employ
ed analy equency
Source Colle ys is ed
si
cti on /
s
used

Establishin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
g SGC as a
structure
G for shared
O governance
A and a
L feedback
mechanism
anchored
on
DO 26, s.
2022
Schools Schools Refers to Scho The use SGO Annually DepE Scho Quan Plann Ann Scho DepE Annual
adopt and adopt and the ols of SGC D, d CO, ols tit in g ua ols d CO, accomp
implement implement number of adop functiona SMM RO, adop ative and lly adop RO, lis
O the the schools t and lity & SDO, t and analy Resea t and SDO, hment
U processes processes that adopt imple assessme E School impl sis r ch, impl and report
T and and and me nt tool. and eme SMM eme extern
C mechanis mechanism implement nt Scho nt &E nt al
O m of of school processes the ol the the stake
M school governance and proce proc proc hol
E governance council in mechanis sses esse esse ders
council in their m of school and s s
their program, governance mech and and
program, projects council in anis mec mec
projects and their m of hani hani
and activities. program, scho sm sm
activities. projects ol of of
and gover scho scho
activities. nan ol ol
ce gover gover
coun nan nan
cil in ce ce
their coun coun
progr cil in cil in
am, their their
proje prog prog
cts ram, ram,
and proje proje
activi cts cts
ties. and and
activit activi
ies. ties.

Oriented 94% of Refers to Data SGO Quarterly SDO- 94% Quan Plann Qua 94% DepE Quarte
O
the school the the School colle D, SMM& of the tit in g rt of the d CO, rly
U
heads on school heads who ct ed SMM E, scho ative and erly scho RO, accomp
T
the heads attended from & E School ol analy Resea ol SDO, lis
P
implement oriented the the AND head sis r ch, head and hment
U
atio n of oriented asse SCH s SMM s extern report
T
SGC ss OO L orien &E orien al
ment t ed t ed stake
1
tool hol
used. ders
Conduct Conducted Refers to Quarterly SDO- Con Plann Qua Con DepE Quarte
A
orientation one the SMM& du in g rt du d CO, rly
C
on the SGC (1) number E, cted and erly cted RO, accomp
T
among orientation of Schoolone Resea one SDO, lis
I
school on the orientatio (1) r ch, (1) and hment
V
heads SGC n orien SMM orien extern report
I
among conducte t &E t al
T
school d ation ation stake
Y
heads on on hol
the the ders
1
SGC SGC
amo amo
ng ng
scho scho
ol ol
heads heads
Title: Adoption of the Basic Education Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (BEMEF)

Deped 's Agency Results Plann Semi- - Analy Plann Sem School Progra Twice
plans Performa Evaluati in g Annual ze d in g i s m in a
,programs nce on, and as and ann Heads owners year/2
G and Indicator Monitori Resea Agenc Resea ua and Consult semest
O policies s ng r ch y r ch lly Progra ati on ers
A are geared Reports, perfor and m Meeting
L towards Surveys, manc SMM Owner s
the FGDs, e E s,
achieveme Docum Indica SDS,
nt of ent to rs ASDS
organizatio Reviews
nal , EBEIS
outcomes

Schools % of Refers to Administr SMM Semi- presen Quan QAD Semi School EXECO Twice
Division DepEd the ativ e &E Annual t the tit - s M in a
Offices and Schools number of Data: results ative Ann Heads year/2
O Schools and Program - in analy ua nd semest
U integrate Program owners in Consolida Execut sis lly Progra ers
T M&E owners SDOs and ted ive m
C findings/re integrate schools Policy/pro Board Owner
O sult s in M& E in integrate gra m M & Meetin s,
M their their M & E in E Reports g SDS,
E programs/ programs/ their - QAME ASDS
poli poli programs/ results
cies/plans cies/plans poli
in line with in line cies/plans
BEMEF with in line
standards BEMEF with
standards BEMEF
standards
Oriented % of Number of Administr SMM Semi- Execut Quan SMM Semi EXEC EXECO Semi
SDO oriented oriented ativ e &E Annual ive tit &E - OM M -
Program SDOs SDOs Data: Board ative Ann Annu
owners and Program Program - Google Meetin Analy ua al
O School owners proponent Sheets g for sis lly
U Heads for and and School (Attendan the
T (Program/P School Heads in ce) assess
P olic y Heads in line with - QAME me nt
U owners and line with BEMEF results of
T School BEMEF standards Perfor
Heads) standards ma
1 nce;
Progra
m
owners
- basis
for
improv
e ment
of
progra
m
perfor
ma
nce
A Conduct No. of Refers to Administr SMM Semi- EXECO Quan SMM Semi EXEC EXECO Semi
C of oriented the ativ e &E Annual M tit &E - OM M -
T Orientati Program number of Data: ative Ann Annu
I ons proponent conducted - Google analy ua al
V -with SDO and school orientatio Sheets sis lly
I Program heads on ns on the (Attendan
T owners/pr BEMEF BEMEF ce)
Y opo nents - QAME
-with the results
School
Heads

1
M&E No. of M Refers to Administr SMM Twice a EXECO Quan SMM Qua OSDS, DIMAN Quarterly
Plans on & E Plans the ativ e &E year M- tit &E rt EXEC CO M,
SDO on SDO number of Data: for ative erly OM EXECO
Dipolog Dipolog institution - Google assess Analy M
PAPs PAPs alize d M & Sheets me nt sis
aligned aligned E Plans (Attendan of
with with over the ce) Perfor
BEMEF BEMEF total - QAME ma
O standards Standards number of results nce;,
U SDO - Approv ORD-
T Dipolog ed serves
P PAPs Proposal as
U s basis
T - Activity for
Complet decisio
2 ion n
Reports makin
g and
policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma
nce
Review No. of M Refers to Administr SMM Monthly EXECO Qualit SMM Ann OSDS, EXECO Annually
and & E Plans the ativ e &E M- at ive &E ua EXEC M
A
provide of the number of Data: for Analy lly OM
C
inputs on SDO- inputs - Google assess sis
T
the M & E Functio provided Sheets me nt
I
Plans of nal on the (Attendan of
V
the SDO Division crafting of ce) Perfor
I
Functio s M&E - QAME ma
T
nal plans of results nce;,
Y
Division the SDO- - Approv OSDS-
s Functional ed serves
1
Divisions Proposal as
over the s basis
total - Activity for
number of Complet decisio
DepEd ion n
Progra Reports makin
ms g
and
poli
cy

formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma
nce

Review No. of Refers to Administr SMM Monthly EXECO Qualit SMM Ann OSDS, EXECO Annually
and provided the ativ e &E M- at ive &E ua EXEC M
provide inputs on number of Data: for Analy lly OM
inputs on the crafting inputs - Google assess sis
the M & E of M & E provided Sheets me nt
Plans of Plans of on the (Attendan of
the SDO the Schools crafting of ce) Perfor
A Functio M&E - QAME ma
C nal plans of results nce;,
T Division the SDO- - Approv OSDS-
I s Functional ed serves
V Divisions Proposal as
I over the s basis
T total - Activity for
Y number of Complet decisio
DepEd ion n
2 Programs Reports makin
g and
policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma nce

O Capacita No. of Refers to Administr SMM Once a EXECO Qualit SMM Ann OSDS, EXECO Annually
U ted SDO capacita the ativ e &E year M- at &E ua EXEC M
T Functional ted SDO no. of Data: for ive lly OM
Capacita - Google assess Analy
ted me sis

P Divisions Functional SDO Sheets nt of
U and Divisions Functiona (Attendan Perfor
T Schools and l Divisions ce) ma
Program Schools' and - QAME nce;,
3 Owners on Program Schools' results OSDS-
M&E Owners on Program - Approv serves
Processes M& E Owners ed as
and other Processes on M & E Proposal basis
related and other Processes s for
Technolog related and other - Activity decisio
y technology related Complet n
technolog ion makin
y Reports g and
policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma
nce

Conduct No. of Refers to BEMEF SMM Quarterly EXECO Qualit SMM Ann OSDS, EXECO Annually
M&E conducte the no. of Tools &E M- at ive &E ua EXEC M
related d M& E conducte for Analy lly OM
activities related d M& E assess sis
A to SDO activities related me nt
C Functiona to SDO activities of
T l Functiona to SDO Perfor
I Divisions l Functiona ma
V and Divisions l nce;,
I Schools and Divisions OSDS-
T Schools and serves
Y Schools as
basis
1 for
decisio
n
makin
g and
policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al

Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma
nce;
and
SDS-
(SGOD
-
M&E) -
serves
as
basis
for
efficient
implem
en
tation
of
PAPs

Communic No. of Refers to Administr SMM After a EXECO Qualit SMM Ann OSDS, EXECO Annually
ate d communic the no. of ativ e &E year M- at ive &E ua EXEC M
results of ated results communic Data: for Analy lly OM
BEMEF of BEMEF ated results - Google assess sis
status of status of of BEMEF Sheets me nt
Policy Policy status of (Attendan of
Implement Implement Policy ce) Perfor
O atio n atio n Implement - QAME ma
U atio n results nce;,
T - Approv OSDS-
P ed serves
U Proposal as
T s basis
- Activity for
4 Complet decisio
ion n
Reports makin
g and
policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office

perfor
ma
nce;
and
SDS-
(SGOD
-
M&E) -
serves
as
basis
for
efficient
implem
en
tation
of
PAPs

Prepare No. of Refers to BEMEF SMM After a EXECO Qualit SMM Onc OSDS, EXECO Annually
Report on reports the no. of Tool &E year M- at ive &E e EXEC M
the status prepared reports for Analy ever OM
of BEMEF on the prepared assess sis y
Policy status of on the me nt two
Implement BEMEF status of of year
atio n Policy BEMEF Perfor s
Implement Policy ma
atio n Implement nce;,
A atio n OSDS-
C serves
T as
I basis
V for
I decisio
T n
Y makin
g and
1 policy
formul
ati on
;Functi
on al
Divisio
ns-
basis
for
improv
e ment
of
office
perfor
ma
nce;
and
SDS-
(SGOD
-
M&E) -

serves
as
basis
for
efficient
implem
en
tation
of PAPs
Title: Orientation on Quality Assurance, Technical Assistance and Monitoring and Evaluation
In line with
the Quality
Manageme
nt System
Implement
atio n and
in support
with the
Learning
Recovery
Plan of the
G
SDO, the
O
Schools
A
Manageme
L
nt
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
conduct
QATAME
to the
SPET I-III,
Teache
r I-

III,MT
I-III
handling
learners
with
disabilities
and
implementi
ng
schools
O Schools
U Manageme
T nt
C Monitoring
and
Evaluation

O conduct
M QATAME
E to the
SPET I-III,
Teacher
I-III, MT
I-III
handling
learners
with
disabilities
and
implementi
ng
schools
Oriented % of Number of Administr SMM 'Janu Executi Quan SMM Jan EXEC EXECO Annually
Special oriented oriented ativ e &E ary ve tit &E ua OM M
Education SPET I-III, teachers Data: 2023/ Board ative ry Inclusi
Teachers Teacher SPET I-III, - Annually Meetin Analy 202 ve
and I-III, MT Teacher I- Survey g for sis 3/ Educa
Implement I-III III, MT I-III Form the Ann tio n
O ing handling handling -on Re- assess ua Manag
U Schools learners learners evaluatio me nt lly er
T on with with n of SPED of SPED
P QATAME disabilities disabilities Program Perfor Divisi
U (Quality and and 5 points ma on
T Assurance, implementi implementi scale nce; Coord
Technical ng schools ng schools - QAME Inclusi in
1 Assistance in line with in line with results ve ator
and QATAME QATAME Educati SPED
Monitoring on Imple
and Manage m
Evaluation r SPED entin
Divisio g
n schoo
Coordi ls
nat or
SPED
Imple
me
nting
schools
A Conduct No. of Number Administr SMM Janu Execut Quan SMM Jan EXEC EXECO Annually
C of orientation of ativ e &E ary ive tit &E ua OM M
T Orientati for SPET I- conducte Data: 2013 Board ative ry Inclusi
I ons III, d - / Meetin Analy 202 ve
V -Special Teacher orientati Survey Annually g for sis 3/ Educa
I Education I-III, MT ons on Form the Ann tio n
T Teachers I-III the -on Re- assess ua Manag
Y and handling QATAME evaluatio me nt lly er
Implement learners n of SPED of SPED
ing with Program Perfor Divisio
Schools disabilities ma n
on and nce;
QATAME implementi
(Quality ng

1 Assurance, schools in 5 points Inclusi Coord
Technical line with scale ve in
Assistance QATAME - QAME Educati ator
and results on SPED
Monitoring Manage Imple
and r SPED m
Evaluation) Divisio entin
n g
Coordi schoo
nat or ls
SPED
Imple
me
nting
school
s
Title: School Compliance to Quality Standards for Private Schools
Approve
Governmen
t Permit to
Operate/R
G eco gnition,
O Special
A Order,
L Tuition Fee
Increase,
Certificate
of Good
Standing.

Validation Validation Refers to The use SGO Annually DepE Quan SDO- Ann DepE Annual
of of the of D, d CO, tit SMM ua d CO, accomp
documents documents number of portfolio SMM RO, ative &E lly RO, lis
of schools of schools private as & SDO, analy SDO, hment
O requesting requesting schools documen E School sis and report
U for for requesting ts for the and extern
T Governmen Governmen for private Priva al
C t Permit to t Permit to Governmen schools te stake
O Operate/R Operate/Re t Permit to requestin Scho hol
M eco gnition, cog nition, Operate/Re g for ol ders
E Special Special cog nition, Governm
Order, Order, Special ent
Tuition Fee Tuition Fee Order, Permit to
Increase, Increase, Tuition Fee Operate/
Certificate Certificate Increase, Rec
of Good of Good Certificate ognition,
Standing. Standing. of Good Special
Standing. Order,

Tuition
Fee
Increase,
Certificat
e of
Good
Stand
ing.
100% or 28 % of Number of Complet SM Annuall RO, Quali QAD Ann DepE Accom Semi-
out private private e M& y SDO- tat ive , ua d plis Annu
of 28 schools schools portfolio E SMM SDO lly CO, hment ally
Approved or 28 validated of &E, - RO, Report
Governme out of 28 document documen Priv SM SDO,
nt Permit validated s for ts of ate M& and
to document Governme private Sch E exter
O Operate/R s for nt Permit schools ool nal
U eco Governme to requesti stake
T gnition, nt Permit Operate/R ng hol
P Special to ecog Governm ders
U Order, Operate/R nition, ent
T Tuition ecog Special Permit to
Fee nition, Order, Operate/
Increase, Special Tuition Rec
Certificate Order, Fee ognition,
of Good Tuition Increase, Special
Standing. Fee Certificate Order,
Increase, of Good Tuition
Certificate Standing. Fee
of Good Increase,
Standing. Certificat
e of Good
Standing
for
submis
sion to
RO
Conduct Number of % of Annually SDO- Plan Qu DepE Accom Annually

A Orientatio orientatio private SGOD nin g art d plis
C n on n schools SMM and erly CO, hment
T Various conducted attended &E, Rese RO, report
I Guideline on the Priv ar SDO,
V s, Various orientatio ate ch, and
I Implemen Guideline n Sch SMM exter
T tatio n for s, conducted ool &E nal
Y Private Implemen on stake
Schools tatio n for Various hol
Private Guideline ders
Schools s,
Implemen
tatio n for
Private
Schools
Building Partnership and Linkages Program
Goal: To provide technical support in strengthening and sustaining relations and collaboration of education partners and stakeholders, and mobilizing
resources; and providing technical assistance to support special programs and projects towards increasing access to enhancing the delivery of quality
basic education.

Establishment of Purpose Core Process 3 - Data Analysis Dissemination, Reporting, and
Management
and Scope Utilization
User
Respo Respo
Data (s) Frequ Commu Repo
Descri nsible nsible
Objectiv Collecti Schedule/F and Data ency Audien nication rting
ption Indi Office Indi office Indi
e Indic on requency in use( analysi of ce of strategie sche
of cato in cato for cato
Stateme ators Method data s) of s to be data M&E s to be dule/
Indicat rs data rs data rs
nt / Data collection data used analy results employe frequ
ors Collect analys
Source colle sis d/ used ency
ion is
cted
O Schools % of % of School SMN Annually SMN Quanti SMN Annu SGOD, Stakehol Annu
adopt Scho School Report Sectio Secti tative Sectio ally Schools ders ally
U impleme ols s / n on Analys n , Forum/
T nt the conduc is Stakeh Summit
issued ted/ DPDS olders
C guidelin implem Planni
es and ented ng &
O sustain the Resear
partners PPAs
M ch
hip with with Sectio
E educatio suppor
n
n t of
partners stakeh
/ olders
stakehol
ders
O Schools % % of DPDS SMN Quarterly SMN Quanti SMN Annu SGOD, DPDS Annu
increase incre School Sectio Secti tative Sectio ally Schools Report/ ally
U d ased s with n on Analys n ,
number of increas is Stakeh MOA/M
T OU
of resou ed olders
P stakehol rces genera Legal
ders ted
U and Office
resour
resourc ces
T
es

Management
User
Respo Respo
ors Collect analys
ion is
cted

A To % of % of Condu SMN Annually SMN Qualit SMN Annu SGOD, Advocac Annu
conduct Scho School ct of Sectio Secti ative Sectio ally Schools y ally
C orientati ol Heads Orient n on Analys n , Material
T on to Head / Focal ation/ is Stakeh s
School s Person Profilin olders prepared
I Heads s g Profi Planni
and Oriente ng &
V focal ling
d/ Resear
persons Capaci ch
I
on tated Sectio
T School’s n
Local
I and
Internat
E ional
S Partners
hips
To No. Numbe DPDS/ SMN Quarterly SMN Quanti SMN Quart SGOD, Resource Quar
identify of r of Profilin Sectio Secti tative Sectio erly Schools generate terly
potentia Dono potenti g n/ on Analys n , d from
l rs al School is Stakeh identifie
partners donors s olders d donors
/ for for
Profi
donors specific specific
ling
for progra program
specific ms
program
s and
projects Increas
ed
genera
ted

resour
ces
No. Numbe DPDS/ SMN Quarterly SMN Quanti SMN Quart SGOD, Signed Quar
of r of Sectio Secti tative Sectio erly Schools MOA/ terly
MOU MOA/ Consul n on Analys n/ , MOU
/MO MOU tative is Legal Stakeh
U crafted Meetin Office olders
g
Approve
d
Numbe proposal
r of s
approv
ed
propos
als

Management
User
Respo Respo
ors Collect analys
ion is
cted

To No. No. of DPDS/ SMN Annually SMN Qualit SMN Annu SGOD, MOA on Annu
expand/ of MOA/ Sectio Secti ative Sectio ally Schools sustaina ally
sustain MOA MOU n on Analys n/ , bility of
and / signed Stakeh is Legal Stakeh the
instituti MOU vs olders Office olders program
onalize signe targets Forum s
partners d
hips
and
linkages
with
stakehol
ders
To No. Numbe Activity SMN Annually SMN Qualit SMN Annu SGOD, Certificat Annu
accept of r of Report Sectio Secti ative Sectio ally Schools es of ally
donatio turn turn n on/ Analys n/ , Acceptan
ns (e.g. over over is Legal Stakeh ce of
equipme ceremo Lega Office olders project/
nt, ny l program
tools) conduc Offic equipme
from ted/ e nt tools
program launch turned-
/ ed over to
project the SDO
partners
for
proper
utilizati
on
Invent Invento SMN Annually SMN Qualit SMN Annu SGOD, List of Annu
ory list ry Sectio Secti ative Sectio ally Schools project/ ally
of Report n on/ Analys n , program
progra is equipme

m/ Sup Stakeh nt/ tools
project ply olders turned
equip Offic over to
ment/ e the SDO
tools
Planning and Research Program

Goal: To lead in the crafting of the Division Education Development Plan (DEDP) and the Annual Implementation Plan (AIP), and assist the schools in
the preparation of the School Improvement Plan (SIP); to generate and disseminate timely, accurate, and relevant basic education statistics; to prepare
the Division Research Agenda based on Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) standard and oversee its implementation.
Core Process 1 Core Process 4 - Information

- Establishment of Purpose Dissemination, Reporting, and
Management Analysis
Object Data Respo Schedule/ User Respo Audienc Commu Repo

Descriptio Indi Indi Frequ Indi
ive Indicat Collec nsible Frequency (s) Data nsible e of rting
n of cato cato ency cato nication
State ors tion Office in data and analys office M&E sche
Indicators rs rs of rs strategie
ment Metho in collection use( is to for results dule
data s to be
d/ data s) of data /
Data Collec data be analys analys employe frequ
Sourc tion colle used is is d/ used ency
e cted
O Numbe
r
U Techn assiste Number of BERF Resea Annually Rese Quant Resea Annu SDO, Researc Annu
ical d researches Liqui rch arch itative rch ally Schools h fora, ally
T assist assisted datio unit, unit; Analys unit, , dissemi
C ance n PRS vario is PRS Stakeho nation,
to Repor us lders and
O resear t unit utilizatio
Number of Sexenniall
ch s n
M plans y; Sexen Annu
(DEDP, All Annually; Resea nially; ally
E AIP, SIP) Copie units Triennially Qualit rch Annu SDO,
Techn assisted s of of the Vari ative unit, ally; Schools Plannin
ical compl SDO; ous analys PRS; Trienn , g
assist eted school unit is SMM ially Stakeho seminar
ance plans s s E lders s and
to writesho
DEDP p
, AIP,
SIP
Resea Numbe Researches Vario Resea Annually Rese Quant Resea Annu SGOD, Researc Annu
rches r of completed us rch arch itative rch ally Schools h fora, ally
O resear and schoo unit, unit, Analys unit, , dissemi
ches; submitted ls PRS PRS is PRS Stakeho nation,
U
plan lders and
T utilizatio
Sexenniall
DEDP, n
Plans y; Annu Annu
AIP, SIPs Vario Vario Annually; Vari Resea ally ally
P crafted us us Triennially ous Qualit rch SGOD,
units; units; unit ative unit, Schools

U and vario variou s; analys PRS; , Plannin
completed us s vario is Vario Stakeho g
T schoo school us us lders seminar
ls s scho units; s and
ols variou writesho
s p;
school publicat
s ion of
plans

Core Process 1 - Establishment Core Process 2 - Data Collection and Core Process 3 - Data
Dissemination, Reporting, and
of Purpose and Scope Management Analysis
Utilization1
Data User
Respo Respo Repo
Collec (s) Frequ Commu
nsible Data nsible rting
Object tion Schedule/ and ency Audienc nication
Descriptio Indi Office Indi analys office Indi sche
ive Indicat Metho Frequency use( of e of strategie
n of cato in cato is to for cato dule
State ors d/ in data s) of data M&E s to be
Indicators rs data rs be data rs /
ment Data collection data analys results employe
Collec used analys frequ
Sourc colle is d/ used
tion is ency
e cted
To N Number of Cond Resea Annually Rese Quant Resea Annu SDO; S Researc Annu
condu umber researcher uct of rch arch itative rch ally chools; h ally
ct of s traini unit, unit, Analys unit, Stakeho dissemi
resear researc trained, c ng, PRS PRS; is PRS lders nation
ch hers apacitated capac vario and
congr and ity us utilizatio
ess number of buildi unit Qualit n
A researches ng s; ative
completed, scho Analys
C presented ols is
T and
submitted

I To No. of Number of Data Planni Sexenniall Plan Quant Planni Annu SDO; Publicat Annu
condu plans plans from ng y; ning itative ng ally Schools ion of ally
V ct crafted crafted vario and Annually; and Analys and ; plans
I strate involving us Resea Triennially Rese is Resea Stakeho
gic the units rch arch rch lders
T planni relevant and/o Sectio Secti Sectio
ng various r n on Qualit n
I units schoo ative
and/or ls Analys
E
schools SMM Vari is
S E ous
unit
s Strate
SDO and gic
units scho planni
and ols ng
school
s
Title: Implementation of Learners Information System (LIS) and Enhanced Basic Education Information System (EBEIS)

Establishment of Purpose and Dissemination, Reporting, and
Management Analysis
Scope Utilization
Objecti Data Respo Schedule/ User(s) Respo

Indi Freq Commu Reporting
ve Indic Descri Colle nsible Frequency Indic Data nsible Indic Audie
cato and uenc nication schedule/
Statem ators ption ction Office in data ators analy office ators nce of
rs use(s) y of strategi frequency
ent of Meth in collection of data sis to for M&E
data es to be
od/ data data
Indicat Data Collec collect be analy anal result employe
ors Sour tion ed used sis ysis s d/ used
ce
Goal Establis -DO - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

hing an 27 s.
accurat 2019
e and
reliable
registry
of all
learner
s in all
public
and
private
schools
and
ALS,
and
profile
of
schools
which
are
essenti
al to
plannin
g and
budgeti
ng ,
resourc
e
allocati
on and
target
setting.
Out Schools Refers Schoo SGO Annually DepEd School Quant Plann Ann School DepE Annual
com adopt to the ls D, CO, s itative ing ually s d CO, accompl
e and numbe adopt PRS RO, adopt analy and adopt RO, ishment
implem rf and and and sis Resea and SDO, report
ent the school imple SCHO SDO, imple rch imple intern
process s that ment OL School ment ment al and
es and adopt the the the extern
mechan and proce proces proces al
isms of imple sses ses ses stake
the ment and and and holder
Learner proces mech mecha mecha s
s ses anism nisms nism
Informa and s of of the of the
tion mecha the Learne Learne
System nisms Learn rs rs
and of the ers Inform Inform
Enhanc Learne Infor ation ation
ed rs matio Syste Syste
Basic Inform n m and m and
Educati ation Syste Enhan Enhan
on Syste m and ced ced
Informa m and Enha Basic Basic
tion Enhan nced Educa Educa
System ced Basic tion tion
Basic Educa Inform Inform
Educa tion ation ation
tion Infor Syste Syste
Inform matio m m
ation n
Syste Syste
m m

Out Oriente 95% of Refers Data SGO Annually PRS, 95% of Quant Plann Ann 95% of DepE Annual
put d the the to the gener D, ITO, the itative ing ually the d CO, accompl
1 school school School ate PRS School school analy and school RO, ishment
heads, heads, heads, from AND s and heads, sis Resea heads, SDO, report
LIS LIS LIS the SCHO ALS LIS rch LIS intern
coordin coordi coordi syste OL imple coordi coordi al and
ator, nators nators m mente nators nators extern
ALS and and rs and and al
implem ALS ALS ALS ALS stake
enters imple imple imple imple holder
on the mente mente mente mente s
implem rs rs who rs rs
entatio oriente attend oriente oriente
n of the d ed the d d
yearly orient
data ation
collecti
on in
the
LIS/EB
EIS
Acti Conduc Condu Refers Annually SDO- Condu Plann Ann Condu DepE Annual
vity t cted to the PRS, cted ing ually cted d CO, accompl
1 orientat one (1) numbe and one (1) and one (1) RO, ishment
ion on orient r of ITO orient Resea orient SDO, report
LIS/EB ation orient ation rch, ation intern
EIS on ations on ITO on al and
LIS/E condu LIS/E LIS/E extern
BEIS cted BEIS BEIS al
among among among stake
school school school holder
heads, heads, heads, s
LIS LIS LIS
coorna coordi coordi

tors nators nators
and and and
ALS ALS ALS
imple imple imple
mente mente mente
rs rs rs
Goal: To provide L and D Interventions to Teaching, Teaching Related and Non –Teaching Personnel to continually update themselves to the latest
need in teaching and providing technical assistance to all programs that the SDO will be conducting and supports Rewards and Recognition.
Core Process 4 -
Establishment of Purpose Core Process 3 - Data Analysis Dissemination,
Management
and Scope Reporting, and
Utilization
User(
Respon
Data Respon s) Frequ Audie Communi Repor
Descri Data sible
Objecti Collecti sible Schedule/Fr and ency nce cation ting
ption analys office
ve Indica Indica on Office equency in use(s) Indica of Indica of strategies sched
of is to for
Statem tors tors Method in data data of tors data tors M&E to be ule/
Indicat be data
ent / Data Collecti collection data analys resul employed freque
ors used analysi
Source on collec is ts / used ncy
s
ted
Provisi % of No. of QATA SMME Year- HRD, Annu
O HRD Year-round
on Trainin training ME Section round CID ally
U of Stra g s Chief
tegic conduc conduc Planni ,
Plan ted ted ng & SGO
for L partici Resear D
T and D pated Chief
ch
Interve by Section
ntion Teachi
C to % of ng, HRD,
O employ Schoo Teachi Plann
ees ls ng- ing
M
Related
and
Non-
E Teachi
ng
Person
nel
O No. of
% of HRD,
U employ
% employ No. of CID
T ees Mid-
increa ees CA. HRD, Chief
P trained QATA SMME Year- Year/ Annu
sed of receive Certific HRD YTear-round Plann ,
U based ME Section round Annual ally
resou d the ates ing SGO
on Report
rces trainin issued D
T their g Chief
TNA
Core Process 4 -
Establishment of Purpose Core Process 3 - Data Analysis Dissemination,
Management
and Scope Reporting, and
Utilization

User(
Respon
Data Respon s) Frequ Audie Communi Repor
Descri Data sible
Objecti Collecti sible Schedule/Fr and ency nce cation ting
ption analys office
ve Indica Indica on Office equency in use(s) Indica of Indica of strategies sched
of is to for
Statem tors tors Method in data data of tors data tors M&E to be ule/
Indicat be data
ent / Data Collecti collection data analys resul employed freque
ors used analysi
Source on collec is ts / used ncy
s
ted
SMN
A
Section
C To SGO
% of SMM Planni
T conduc employ
Conduc
E
D,
t t of Qualit ng CID Programs
I trainin % of ees Secti
Orienta SMME ative Year- and . Matrix Year-
Atten Oriente Annually on,
V gs tion/ Section Analys round SGO of round
dees d/ HRD,
I based Profilin is D Training
Capaci Plann
T on tated
g
ing
Chief
I TNAs s
E
S
Building Partnership and Linkages Program
Goal: To provide technical support in strengthening and sustaining relations and collaboration of education partners and stakeholders, and mobilizing
resources; and providing technical assistance to support special programs and projects towards increasing access to enhancing the delivery of quality
basic education.

Utilization

Data User(
Respo Respo Repo
Colle s) Freq
Objectiv ction Schedule/ and uenc Audie Communicatio
Indi Description Indi Office Indi analy office Indi sche
e Meth Frequency use(s y of nce of n strategies to
cato of cato in cato sis to for cato dule
Stateme od/ in data ) of data M&E be employed/
rs Indicators rs data rs be data rs /
nt Data collection data anal results used
Collec used analy frequ
Sour colle ysis
tion sis ency
ce cted
O 1. All % of % Nati Educ Annually Educ Quant Educ Ann SGOD, DIMANCOM Ann
schools Scho of constru onal ation ation itative ation ually School ually
U and ols ction/repai Scho Facili Facil Analy Facili s,
T learning r of Schools ol ties ities sis ties/ Stakeh
centers with Buil Sectio Secti Plann olders
C are support ding n on ing &
monitor of CO/LG Inve Resea
O ed to U and ntor rch
have a other y Sectio
M
physical stakeholder (NSB n
E environ s I)
ment
that is
conduci
ve to
effective
teaching
,
learning
and
working
by
ensurin
g access
to
adequat

e,
structur
ally and
physical
ly safe
building
s,
grounds
and
facilities
accordi
ng to
the
require
ments
and
standar
ds of an
educatio
n and
work
facility
that is
environ
mentall
y
sustain
able,
hazard
free,
gender
sensitiv
e
and
friendly
to
people
with
disabilit
y.
O Increase % % of NSBI Educ Annually Educ Quant Educ Ann SGOD, NSBI Ann
in the incr recipient ation ation itative ation ually School Report/LGU ually
U number ease Schools Facili Facil Analy Facili s, status of
of d of with new ties ities sis ties Stakeh implementatio
T
constru reso constructio Sectio Secti Sectio olders n report
P ction urce n and n on n
and s repaired
U repaired classrooms
classroo
T
ms

Utilization
Data User(
Respo Respo Repo
Colle s) Freq
Sour colle ysis
tion sis ency
ce cted

A To % of % of Con Educ Annually Qualit Ann SGOD, Inventory Ann
conduct Scho Schools duct ation ative ually School report ually
C ocular ol assessed of Facili Educ Analy Educ s and
ation ation
T inspecti Hea and Profi ties sis Learni
on and ds inspected ling Sectio Facil Facili ng
ities ties
I inventor n Center
y of Secti Sectio s
V school on n
building
I
s
T Profil Plann
ing ing &
I Resea
E rch
Sectio
S n
To No. Number of NSBI Educ Annually Quant Educ Ann SGOD, Allocation from Ann
identify of potential Profi ation itative ation ually School the SEF ually
potentia Don donors/LG le Facili Educ Analy Facili s and
l ors U ties ation sis ties Learni
partners allocation Sectio Facil Sectio ng
/ for specific n ities n Center
donors projects Secti s
for on
specific
program
s and
projects Profil
ing

No. Number of NSBI Educ Annually Educ Quant Ann SGOD, Implemented Ann
of approve ation ation itative ually School construction/p ually
MO POWs Facili Facil Analy Educ s and rojects/repairs
U/M implemente ties ities sis ation Learni
OU d Sectio Secti Facili ng
n on ties Center
Sectio Approved
s proposals
n

Utilization
Data User(
Respo Respo Repo
Colle s) Freq
Sour colle ysis
tion sis ency
ce cted
To lobby No. No. of NSBI Educ Annually Educ Qualit Educ Ann SGOD, Approved Ann
for an of approved ation ation ative ation ually School POWs ually
increase MOA and Facili Facil Analy Facili s, and
in the / Implemente ties ities sis ties Learni
SEF MO d Program Sectio Secti Sectio ng
allocatio U of Works vs n on n Center
n sign target/requ s
for con ed ests
structio
n and
repair of
school
building
s
Inventory NSBI Educ Annually Educ Qualit Educ Ann SGOD, List of project/ Ann
list of repo ation ation ative ation ually School school ually
program/ rt Facili Facil Analy Facili s, and buildingss
project ties ities sis ties Learni turned over to
equipment Sectio Secti Sectio ng the SDO
/ tools n on n Center
s

YOUTH FORMATION PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTATION
Goal: To implement and monitor the mandate programs, projects and activities on youth formation from the Central and Regional
Offices including but not limited to the Supreme Student Government Program (SGP), Youth for Environment in Schools-
Organization (YES-O), Barkada Kontra Droga (BKD), Gulayan sa Paaralan Program (GPP), and Child Protection (CP).

Establishment of Dissemination, Reporting,
Management Analysis
Purpose and Scope and Utilization
Data User(
Respon Respon Communi
Collect s) Data Frequ Audie Report
Objecti Descripti sibl e Schedule/Fr sibl e catio n
ion and analysi enc y nce of ing
ve on of Office equenc y in office strategies
Metho use(s) s to be of M&E sched
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Statem Indicato in data data for data to be
d/ of used data result ule/
ent rs Collecti collection analysi employed
Data data analy s freque
on s / used
Sour collect sis ncy
ce ed
Youth PAPs Submis Youth Every after DO, Quanti DO, RO Year- Divisi Division Every
O Formation conducte sion of Format activity RO tativ e and CO end on Memoran after
U Unit d/ Activity ion and year- and and Youth dum/ activity
T conducts implemen Report Unit / end CO Qualit Forma Accomplis and
C the ted the and Region ative tion hmen t annual
No. of PAPs
O mandated mandate Accom al Analys Coordi Report ly

M Youth d Youth plish Office is nators
E Formation Formatio men t / ,
PAPs n PAPs Repor Centra SGOD
(including t l Office
SGP,
BKD,
GPP,
and CP)
Schools Schools Submis SGOD Every after SGOD Quanti SGOD – Year- School Division Annuall
ools
sch
No.
of
implemen impleme sion of – activity – tativ e Youth end s Memorand y

O t localized nted Accom Youth and year- Yout amd Format Youth um/
Youth localized plishm Format end h Qualiti ion Forma Accomplis
U Formation mandate en t ion Form ve Unit tion hment
T d Report Unit ation Analys Coordi Report
P Unit is nator
U s
T PAPs Youth
(including
SGP, BKD, Formation
GPP,
and CP) PAPs

Establishment of Dissemination, Reporting,
Management Analysis
Purpose and Scope and Utilization
Data User(
Respon Respon Communi
Collect s) Data Frequ Audie Report
Objecti Descripti sibl e Schedule/Fr sibl e catio n
ion and analysi enc y nce of ing
ve on of Office equenc y in office strategies
Indicators Metho use(s) s to be of M&E sched
Indicators
Indicators
Indicators
Statem Indicato in data data for data to be
d/ of used data result ule/
ent rs Collecti collection analysi employed
Data data analy s freque
on s / used
Sour collect sis ncy
ce ed
To Activities Activ SGOD – Every after DO, RO Qualita SGOD – Annuall SGOD Activity Ever
facilitate facilitated ity Youth activity and CO tive Youth y Chief Report/ y
No. of activities
and and Repo Format Analysi Format Accomplis activ

implement implemen rt ion s ion hment ity
the ted by the Unit Unit Report
mandated unit
Youth
Formation
PAPs
To Schools Monitor SGOD – Every after SGOD – Quanti SGOD – Every SGOD Consolida 7
facilitate conducted ing tool Youth election Youth tativ e Youth after Chief ted days
and SPG and Format Forma Analys Format electi implemen after
A
ensure SSG ion tion is ion on tation the
No. of schools
C
the Elections Unit Unit report electi
T
conduct of based on based on on
I
elections the the
V
of SPG election monitorin
I
and SSG guidelines g tool
T
in all
I
schools

E To Schools Help SGOD – Every SGOD – Quanti SGOD – Every SGOD Consult Every
S provide that are Desk Youth after Youth tativ e Youth after Chief ation after
technical provided throug Format submissi Forma Analys Format the Report submis
% of schools
assistan technical h FB ion on of tion is ion submi sio n of
ce to assistance GC and Unit concerns Unit Unit ssion concer
schools against Google / of ns
on schools Forms consultat concer
Youth who ion ns
Formatio asked for meetings
n PAPs technical
assistance

Title: Project SSECURE Schools: Safe, Secured and Resilient Schools
Core Process 4 -
Core Process 2 - Data Collection Core Process 3 - Data
Establishment of Dissemination,
and Management Analysis
Purpose and Scope Reporting, and
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
Dat sp Sch Use Fr u mu
De D sp po
a on edu r(s) eq di nica
sc at on rti
Coll sib le/ an ue e tion
rip a sib ng
ecti le Fre d nc n stra
Obje tio In In an le In sc
on Off que use y ce tegi
ctive Ind n di di al offi di he
Met ice ncy (s) of of es
Stat icat of ca ca ys ce ca du
hod in in of da M to
eme ors In to to is for to le
/ da dat dat ta & be
nt dic rs rs to da rs / f
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
a Co coll coll al re loye
or us an ue
Sou lle ecti ect ys s d/
s ed aly nc
rce cti on ed is ul use
sis y
on ts d
G Learne 48 Refe Resul SGO Annu DRR Qua SGO Ann - OC Counc Ann
o rs are scho rs to ts D al MS, ntit D ual D, il ual
al resilie ols the Evalu (DR N/LD ativ (DR Meeti
nt, with no. ation, RM, RRM e& RM, ngs,
and 100% of Docu PO, C– Qua PRS,
enjoy comp scho ment asses litat

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
and lianc ols s SM smen ive SM ND Year-

exercis e in Revie ME) t of Anal ME) RR End
e their with com w, perfo ysis MC, Evalu
rights SSP plia rman ation
to be and nce Progr ce on RO &
safe CSS with ess the Exe Planni
and SSP imple ng

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
protec Indic and Repor ment co Works

ted ators CSS ts, ation m, hops
Indi of
cato SSP SFD SD
rs Indic RR O
ators, Exe
co
m

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
CSS &
Activi Ma
ties nco
m

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O DepEd 48 Refe Site SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Sem DR Mid- Semi
u offices scho rs to or D al Exec ntit D i- RM Year -
tc and ols the Ocula (DR om & ativ (DR Ann S, Evalu Ann
o school prepa no. r RM, Manc e& RM, ual ation ual,
m s are red of Inspe PO, om – Qua PRS, RO &
e prepar for scho ction, SM asses litat SM Exe Planni Quar
ed for the ols ME) smen ive ME) ng terly,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
the risks that M&E t of Anal co Works Mont

risks and met Repor perfo ysis m, hops, hly
and impa the ts rman
impact cts of mini ce SD Counc
s of hazar mu O il
hazard ds m Exe Meeti
s/ and stan co ngs,
m

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
emerg disas dard & Comm

encies ters/ for Ma ittee
emer Scho nco Meeti
genci ol m, ngs
es Safe
ty
and

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
Prep
ared
ness
(SSP
)
Indi

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
cato
rs

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O DRRM 48 Refe CSS SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u and/o scho rs to Monit D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp r ols no. oring (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u CCAM with of Chec RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t Plans DRR scho klist PO, om – Anal PRS, m
1. in all M ol SM asses ysis SM &
1 govern plans with ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ance integ DRR t of nco

levels rated M perfo m
develo in integ rman
ped the rate ce
Scho d in
ol SIP
Impr

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ovem
ent
Plan
and
Annu
al
Impr

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ovem
ent
Plan

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Review 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct of SIP scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv and ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it AIP num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
1. ient Atten s–
1. / dance asses
parti Sheet smen
cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Traini 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct ng and scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv Works ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it hop on num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y Project ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. Design of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
ing recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
1. ient Atten s–
2 / dance asses
parti Sheet smen
cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Annua 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct l scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv Strate ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it gic num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y Planni ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. ng for of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
Progra recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
1. ms, ient Atten s–

3 Project / dance asses
and parti Sheet smen
Activiti cipat t of
es ing perfo
related scho rman
to ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
DRRM decisi
and/o on-
r maki
CCAM ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O Annua 48 Refe Annu SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u l scho rs to al D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp budget ols the Imple (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u for reach scho ment RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t DRRM ed at ol ation PO, om – Anal PRS, m
1. and/o least utili Plan, SM asses ysis SM &
3 r 80% zatio ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
CCAM utiliz n of Utiliz t of nco

utilize ation bud ation perfo m
d rate get Repor rman
of the alloc t ce
budg ated
et for

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
alloc DRR
ation M

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Condu 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct ct scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv regula ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it r num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y monito ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. ring of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
3. activiti ient Atten s–

1 es / dance asses
parti Sheet smen
cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O Contin 48 Refe Docu SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u gency scho rs to ment D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp Plans ols the s (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u and with avail Revie RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t Public upda abili w PO, om – Anal PRS, m
1. Servic ted ty of SM asses ysis SM &
4 e Conti haza ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
Contin ngen rd t of nco

uity cy spec perfo m
Plans Plan; ific rman
in all cont ce
govern 1 inge
ance divisi ncy
levels on plan
office

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
develo with per

ped estab scho
lishe ol;
d
Publi Refe
c rs to
Servi the
avail

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ce abili
Conti ty of
nuity PSC
Plan P at
the
divis
ion

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
offic
e

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A (Facilit 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct ate scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv the) ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it Condu num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y ct of ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. Works of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
hop recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
4. and ient Atten s–

1 Writes / dance asses
hop parti Sheet smen
for cipat t of
Contin ing perfo
gency scho rman
Planni ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ng decisi
(Typho on-
on, maki
Tsuna ng
mi purp
and oses
second

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ary
hazard
s)

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O Safety 48 Refe Site SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u and scho rs to or D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp emerg ols the Ocula (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u ency with no. r RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t suppli 80% of Inspe PO, om – Anal PRS, m
1. es and comp scho ction SM asses ysis SM &
5 equip lianc ols ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ment e rate that t of nco

to all on met perfo m
DepEd Scho the rman
offices ol mini ce
and Safet mu
school y and m
s Prepa stan

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
provid redne dard

ed ss for
chec Scho
klist ol
Safe
ty
and

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
Prep
ared
ness
(SSP
)
Indi

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
cato
rs

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Procur 33 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct ement scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv of ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it safety num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y and ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. emerg of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
ency recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
5. suppli ient Atten s–

1: es and / dance asses
equip parti Sheet smen
ment" cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O Functi 1 Refe Schoo SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u onal divisi rs to l D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp DRRM on the Memo (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u Team wide orga rand RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t establi funct nize um or PO, om – Anal PRS, m
1. shed ional d Issua SM asses ysis SM &
6 in all DRR tea nces ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
govern M m at t of nco
ance Team the perfo m
levels estab divis rman
lishe ion ce
d offic
with e
repre

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
senta
tions
from
scho
ol

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Forma 1 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct tion of divisi rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv Divisio on the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it n- office num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y Wide ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. DRRM of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
Team recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
6. ient Atten s–
1 / dance asses
parti Sheet smen
cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ct ct divisi rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv orient on the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it ation office num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y on the ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. roles of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
and recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
6. functi ient Atten s–

2 ons of / dance asses
DRRM parti Sheet smen
cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ct ct divisi rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv orient on the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it ation office num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y on the ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
1. DRRM of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
Coordi recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
6. nation ient Atten s–

3 and / dance asses
Inform parti Sheet smen
ation cipat t of
Manag ing perfo
ement scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
Protoc decisi
ol on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O DRRM 48 Refe Activi SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u and scho rs to ty D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp CCAM ols the Acco (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u PPAs with num mplis RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t monito upda ber hmen PO, om – Anal PRS, m
2. red ted of t SM asses ysis SM &
1 and progr scho ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
evalua ess ols Repor t of nco

ted on that t perfo m
CSS met rman
Indic the ce
ators mini
mu
m

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
stan
dard
for
CSS
Indi
cato
rs

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
ct ct scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv regula ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it r num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y monito ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
2. ring of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
and recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
1. evalua ient Atten s–

1 tion / dance asses
activiti parti Sheet smen
es cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
O Learne 48 Refe Activi SGO Annu SDO Qua SGO Qua SD Comm Mont
u rs, scho rs to ty D al Exec ntit D rterl O ittee hly
tp Stake ols the Acco (DR om & ativ (DR y Exe Meeti
u holder parti num mplis RM, Manc e RM, co ngs
t s and cipat ber hmen PO, om – Anal PRS, m
4. Person ed in of t SM asses ysis SM &
1 nel drills scho ME) smen ME) Ma

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
partici relate ols Repor t of nco

pated d any that t perfo m
in of the met rman
multi- appli the ce
hazard cable mini
drills hazar mu
ds: m

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
earth stan
quak dard
e, for
fire, CSS
viole Indi
nce, cato
lands rs

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
lide/
flashf
lood,
biolo
gical,
etc.

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
A Partici 48 Refe Activi SGO After SGO Qua SGO Qua SG Staff Quar
ct pate in scho rs to ty D- activi D ntit D rterl OD or terly
iv multi- ols the Imple DRR ty (DRR ativ (DR y Chi Sectio or
it hazard num ment M imple M), e RM) ef, n Mont
y drill ber ation ment Scho Anal Meeti hly
4. initiat of Repor ation ol ysis SM ngs
ed/org recip t, Head ME

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
1. anized ient Atten s–

1 by line / dance asses
agenci parti Sheet smen
es cipat t of
ing perfo
scho rman
ols ce,

Core Process 4 -
Utilization
Re A Com
Re Re
De D sp po
sc at on rti
rip a sib ng
Dat ta a a an E emp
at be ta req
or us an ue
s ed aly nc
sis y
on ts d
decisi
on-
maki
ng
purp
oses

Title: Implementation of Oplan Kalusugan (OK) sa DepED
Core Process 4 -
Core Process 1 -
Core Process 2 - Data Core Process 3 - Data Information
Establishment of
Collection and Management Analysis Dissemination, Reporting,
Purpose and Scope
and Utilization
Res
Res Us pon Com
pon er( Fre
Data Dat sibl muni
sibl Sched s) que Aud
Colle a e catio Report
Descri e ule/Fr an ncy ienc
Obje In Ind ction Ind anal offic Ind n ing
ption Offi equenc d of e of
ctive dic ica Meth ica ysis e ica strate sched
of ce y in us dat M&
State ato tor od/ tor to for tor gies ule/fre
Indica in data e(s a E
ment rs s Data s be dat s to be quenc
tors data collecti ) of an resu
Sourc use a empl y
Coll on da aly lts
e d ana oyed/
ecti ta sis
lysi used
on col s

lec
ted
Go To D.O - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
al imple 28,
ment s.
the 6 2018
majo
r
healt
h
progr
ams
of
Opla
n
Kalu
suga
n
(OK)
sa
DepE
d
Impr - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
oved
learn
ers’
well-
being

Ou Redu Num Refers Num Acco Sch Annual Di Num Qua Sch An Num Dep Acco Annua
tco ced ber to the ber mplis ool vis ber ntit ool nu ber Ed mplis l
me abse of learne of hmen Hea ion of ativ Hea al of CO, hmen
1 nteei scho rs/per scho t lth an scho e lth scho RO, t
sm ols sonnel ols repor and d ols and ols SD Repor
and visit recipie visite t of Nut Re visite Nut visite O t
impr ed nt of d each ritio gio d ritio d and
ove the major n nal n exte
class major progr Unit Off Uni rnal
perfo health ams ice t stak
rman progra of OK ehol
ce. ms sa ders
DepE
d
Ou Child Nutr Refers Nutri (1) Sch Twice De Nutri Qua Sch Twi Impr Dep Annu Month
tco ren ition to the tiona ool a year pE tiona ntit ool ce oved Ed al ly
me eat al numb l Nutri Foc d l ativ Foc a Nutri CO, acco Progre
2 the Stat er of Stat tional al (Baseli CO Stat e al yea tiona RO, mplis ss
meal us of kinder us of Statu Pers ne and , us of anal Per r l SD hmen Report
s Publ garten Publi s of on, Endlin RO Publi ysis son, Stat O, t CO,
ic and gr c Publi Divi e , c Divi us of Sch repor RO
Elem 1-6 Elem c sion reports Elem sion Publi ools t
enta learne entar Elem Foc ) SD entar Foc c ,
ry rs y entar al O, y al Elem stak
Scho with Scho y Pers Sc Scho Per entar ehol
ol impro ol Scho ons, ho ol son y ders
lear ved learn ol HN ol, learn s, Scho
ners nutriti ers learn S, Cit ers HN ol
will onal will ers SG y S, learn
be be OD Nu ers
(2) trit

impr status impr SBFP ion SG
oved . oved Form Co OD
s 1-7 un
cil,
LG
U
Ou Nutri 80% Refers 80% (1) Sch Annual Sc 80% Qua Sch An 80% Dep Annu Month
tp tious of to the of ool ly ho of ntit ool nu of Ed al ly
ut meal ident no of ident Nutri Foc ol ident ativ Foc ally ident CO, acco Progre
1 s ified identif ified tional al Fo ified e al ified RO, mplis ss
serve maln ied maln Statu Pers cal maln anal Per maln SD hmen Report
d in ouri malno ouris s of on, Pe ouris ysis son, ouris O, t CO,
corre shed urishe hed Publi Divi rso hed Divi hed Sch repor RO
ct scho d scho c sion n, scho sion scho ools t
porti ol School ol Elem Foc Di ol Foc ol ,
ons lear childr learn entar al vis learn al learn stak
ners en ers y Pers ion ers Per ers ehol
will with will Scho ons, Fo will son will ders
be norma be ol HN cal be s, be
nor lized nor learn S, Pe nor HN nor
mali nutriti mali ers SG rso mali S, mali
zed onal zed OD ns, zed SG zed
(2)
status HN OD
SBFP S,
Form SG
s 1-7 O
D

Ac Cond Con Refers Annual Sc Cond Sch An Cond Dep Annu Month
tivi uct duct to the ly ho ucte ool nu ucte Ed al ly
ty orien ed numb ol d Foc ally d CO, acco Progre
1 tatio one er of Fo one al one RO, mplis ss
n on (1) orient cal (1) Per (1) SD hmen Report
the orien ation Pe orien son, orien O, t CO,
SBFP tatio condu rso tatio Divi tatio Sch repor RO
amo n on cted n, n on sion n on ools t
ng the Di the Foc the ,
scho SBF vis SBF al SBF stak
ol P ion P Per P ehol
head amo Fo amo son amo ders
s and ng cal ng s, ng
scho scho Pe scho HN scho
ol ol rso ol S, ol
focal head ns, head SG head
perso s HN s OD s
ns. and S, and and
scho SG scho scho
ol O ol ol
focal D focal focal
pers pers pers
ons ons ons
Ac Supe Supe Refers Weekly Sc Supe Sch Mo Supe Dep Annu Month
tivi rvise, rvise to the during ho rvise ool nth rvise Ed al ly
ty facilit d numb the ol d Foc ly d CO, acco Progre
2 ate and er of duratio Fo and al and RO, mplis ss
and facili recipie n of cal facili Per facili SD hmen Report
moni tated nt the Pe tate son, tate O, t CO,
tor in school implem rso in Divi in Sch RO
the the s n, the sion the ools

imple deliv superv entatio Di deliv Foc deliv , repor
ment eries ised n vis eries al eries stak t
ation of and ion of Per of ehol
of NFP monit Fo NFP son NFP ders
the and ored cal and s, and
SBFP Milk Pe Milk HN Milk
to supp rso supp S, supp
scho lies ns, lies SG lies
ol to HN to OD to
benef bene S, bene bene
iciari ficiar SG ficiar ficiar
es ies; O ies; ies;
and D and and
moni moni moni
tore tored tored
d feedi feedi
feedi ng to ng to
ng to bene bene
bene ficiar ficiar
ficiar ies ies
ies in in
in the the
the 38 38
38 recip recip
recip ient ient
ient scho scho
scho ols ols
ols

Ou Cond 100 Refers 100 Acco ND Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tp ucted % of to the % of mplis EP vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ut awar the numb the hmen Coo ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
3 enes 48 er of 48 t rdin an 48 e lth 48 RO, t
s scho learne scho Repor ator d scho anal and scho SD Repor
activi ols rs who ols t Re ols ysis Nut ols O t
ties have have have gio have ritio have and
on recei receiv recei nal recei n recei exte
the ved ed ved Off ved Uni ved rnal
ill anti- anti- anti- ice anti- t anti- stak
effect drug drug drug drug drug ehol
s of and and and and and ders
drug anti- anti- anti- anti- anti-
and smo smoki smo smo smo
tobac king ng king king king
co advo advoc advo advo advo
use cacy acy cacy cacy cacy
and initi initiati initia initia initia
to ative ves. tives. tives. tives.
devel s.
op
amo
ng
learn
ers’
positi
ve
beha
vior
and
life

skills
to
resist
drug
s/tob
acco.
Ac Cond 100 Refers 100 Acco ND Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tivi uct % of to the % of mplis EP vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ty anti- the numb the hmen Coo ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
3 smok 48 er of 48 t rdin an 48 e lth 48 RO, t
ing scho learne scho Repor ator d scho anal and scho SD Repor
and ols rs who ols t Re ols ysis Nut ols O t
anti- have have have gio have ritio have and
drug recei receiv recei nal recei n recei exte
scho ved ed ved Off ved Uni ved rnal
ol- anti- anti- anti- ice anti- t anti- stak
initia drug drug drug drug drug ehol
ted and and and and and ders
activi anti- anti- anti- anti- anti-
ties. smo smoki smo smo smo
king ng king king king
advo advoc advo advo advo
cacy acy cacy cacy cacy
initi initiati initia initia initia
ative ves. tives. tives. tives.
s.
Ou To 100 Refers 100 Acco Win Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tp prom % to the % mplis S vis % ntit ool nu % Ed mplis l
ote sub numb sub hmen Coo ion sub ativ Hea al sub CO, hmen
corre miss er of missi t rdin an missi e lth missi RO, t

ut ct ion school on of Repor ator d on of anal and on of SD Repor
4 hygie of s who WinS t Re WinS ysis Nut WinS O t
ne Win accom Onli gio Onli ritio Onli and
and S plishe ne nal ne n ne exte
sanit Onli d the Moni Off Moni Uni Moni rnal
ation ne online torin ice torin t torin stak
pract Moni evalua g g g ehol
ices torin tion Tool Tool Tool ders
amo g tool. (WaS (WaS (WaS
ng Tool H H H
scho (Wa Facil Facil Facil
ol SH ities, ities, ities,
child Facil Safe Safe Safe
ren ities, Drin Drin Drin
to Safe king king king
main Drin Wate Wate Wate
tain king r, r, r,
a Wate Func Func Func
clean r, tiona tiona tiona
envir Fun l l l
onme ction Toile Toile Toile
nt in al t, t, t,
and Toile Wast Wast Wast
arou t, e e e
nd Wast Segr Segr Segr
scho e egati egati egati
ols to Segr on, on, on,
keep egati Food Food Food
learn on, Safet Safet Safet
ers Food y, y, y,
safe Safet Dew Dew Dew

and y, ormi ormi ormi
healt Dew ng ng ng
hy. ormi and and and
ng Men Men Men
and stru stru stru
Men al al al
stru Healt Healt Healt
al h h h
Heal Man Man Man
th agem agem agem
Man ent). ent). ent).
age
men
t).
Ac Eval 100 Refers 100 Acco Win Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tivi uatio % to the % mplis S vis % ntit ool nu % Ed mplis l
ty n of sub numb sub hmen Coo ion sub ativ Hea al sub CO, hmen
4 the miss er of missi t rdin an missi e lth missi RO, t
scho ion school on of Repor ator d on of anal and on of SD Repor
ol of s who WinS t Re WinS ysis Nut WinS O t
WinS Win accom Onli gio Onli ritio Onli and
imple S plishe ne nal ne n ne exte
ntati Onli d the Moni Off Moni Uni Moni rnal
on. ne online torin ice torin t torin stak
Moni evalua g g g ehol
torin tion Tool Tool Tool ders
g tool. (WaS (WaS (WaS
Tool H H H
(Wa Facil Facil Facil
SH ities, ities, ities,
Facil Safe Safe Safe

ities, Drin Drin Drin
Safe king king king
Drin Wate Wate Wate
king r, r, r,
Wate Func Func Func
r, tiona tiona tiona
Fun l l l
ction Toile Toile Toile
al t, t, t,
Toile Wast Wast Wast
t, e e e
Wast Segr Segr Segr
e egati egati egati
Segr on, on, on,
egati Food Food Food
on, Safet Safet Safet
Food y, y, y,
Safet Dew Dew Dew
y, ormi ormi ormi
Dew ng ng ng
ormi and and and
ng Men Men Men
and stru stru stru
Men al al al
stru Healt Healt Healt
al h h h
Heal Man Man Man
th agem agem agem
Man ent). ent). ent).
age

men
t).
Ou To 100 Refers 100 Acco AR Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tp redu % of to the % of mplis H vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ut ce the numb the hmen Coo ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
5 mate 15 er of 15 t rdin an 15 e lth 15 RO, t
rnal seco secon seco Repor ator d seco anal and seco SD Repor
mort ndar dary ndar t Re ndar ysis Nut ndar O t
ality, y school y gio y ritio y and
mitig scho learne scho nal scho n scho exte
ate ols rs ols Off ols Uni ols rnal
vulne have under have ice have t have stak
rabili unde gone unde unde unde ehol
ty to rgon the rgon rgon rgon ders
unwa e Rapid e e e
nted Rapi HEEA Rapi Rapi Rapi
preg d DSSS d d d
nanc HEE Assess HEE HEE HEE
y, ADS ment. ADS ADS ADS
and SS SS SS SS
impr Asse Asse Asse Asse
ove ssm ssme ssme ssme
healt ent. nt. nt. nt.
h
and
devel
opme
nt
outco
mes
of

learn
ers.
Ac Cond 100 Refers 100 Acco AR Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tivi uct % of to the % of mplis H vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ty Rapi the numb the hmen Coo ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
5 d 15 er of 15 t rdin an 15 e lth 15 RO, t
HEE seco secon seco Repor ator d seco anal and seco SD Repor
ADS ndar dary ndar t Re ndar ysis Nut ndar O t
SS y school y gio y ritio y and
Asse scho learne scho nal scho n scho exte
ssme ols rs ols Off ols Uni ols rnal
nt to have under have ice have t have stak
seco unde gone unde unde unde ehol
ndar rgon the rgon rgon rgon ders
y e Rapid e e e
scho Rapi HEEA Rapi Rapi Rapi
ol d DSSS d d d
learn HEE Assess HEE HEE HEE
ers. ADS ment. ADS ADS ADS
SS SS SS SS
Asse Asse Asse Asse
ssm ssme ssme ssme
ent. nt. nt. nt.
Ou To 100 Refers 100 Acco Men Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tp prom % of to the % of mplis tal vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ut ote the numb the hmen Hea ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
6 ment 48 er or 48 e t lth an 48 e e lth 48 e RO, t
al elem learne leme Repor Coo d leme anal and leme SD Repor
healt enta rs per ntar t rdin Re ntar ysis Nut ntar O t
h ry school y gio y ritio y and

and and who and ator nal and n and exte
raise seco have seco Off seco Uni seco rnal
awar ndar receiv ndar ice ndar t ndar stak
enes y ed y y y ehol
s on scho advoc scho scho scho ders
assoc ols acy ols ols ols
iated has initiati has has has
issue recei ves on recei recei recei
s. ved menta ved ved ved
advo l advo advo advo
cacy health cacy cacy cacy
initi aware initia initia initia
ative ness. tives. tives. tives.
s.
Ac Cond 100 Refers 100 Acco Men Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tivi uct % of to the % of mplis tal vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ty ment the numb the hmen Hea ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
6 al 48 er or 48 t lth an 48 e lth 48 RO, t
healt elem learne elem Repor Coo d elem anal and elem SD Repor
h enta rs per entar t rdin Re entar ysis Nut entar O t
awar ry school y ator gio y ritio y and
enes and who and nal and n and exte
s seco have seco Off seco Uni seco rnal
activi ndar receiv ndar ice ndar t ndar stak
ties y ed y y y ehol
in scho advoc scho scho scho ders
partn ols acy ols ols ols
ershi has initiati has has has
p recei ves on recei recei recei
with ved menta ved ved ved
other advo l advo advo advo

stake cacy health cacy cacy cacy
holde initi aware initia initia initia
rs ative ness. tives. tives. tives.
and s.
linka
ges.
Ou To 100 Refers 100 Acco Sch Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tp provi % of to the % of mplis ool vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ut de the numb the hmen Hea ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
7 vario 48 er of 48 t lth an 48 e lth 48 RO, t
us elem exami elem Repor and d elem anal and elem SD Repor
healt enta ned entar t Nut Re entar ysis Nut entar O t
h ry learne y ritio gio y ritio y and
servi and rs. and n nal and n and exte
ces seco seco Unit Off seco Uni seco rnal
such ndar ndar ice ndar t ndar stak
as y y y y ehol
healt scho scho scho scho ders
h ols ols ols ols
appr have have have have
aisal, been been been been
treat exa exa exa exa
ment mine mine mine mine
, d. d. d. d.
cons
ultati
on,
referr
al,
healt
h

coun
selin
g
amo
ng
other
s, to
prom
ote,
prote
ct
and
main
tain
the
healt
h
statu
s of
learn
ers
and
scho
ol
and
divisi
on
perso
nnel.

Ac Cond 100 Refers 100 Acco Sch Annual Di 100 Qua Sch An 100 Dep Acco Annua
tivi uct % of to the % of mplis ool vis % of ntit ool nu % of Ed mplis l
ty annu the numb the hmen Hea ion the ativ Hea al the CO, hmen
7 al 48 er of 48 t lth an 48 e lth 48 RO, t
leane elem exami elem Repor and d elem anal and elem SD Repor
rs’ enta ned entar t Nut Re entar ysis Nut entar O t
healt ry learne y ritio gio y ritio y and
h and rs. and n nal and n and exte
inspe seco seco Unit Off seco Uni seco rnal
ction ndar ndar ice ndar t ndar stak
. y y y y ehol
scho scho scho scho ders
ols ols ols ols
have have have have
been been been been
exa exa exa exa
mine mine mine mine
d. d. d. d.
Ou Provi 90% Numb Data SH Monthl SD 90% Qua Mo 90% Dep Annu
tp de of er of colle NU y, O- of ntit nth of Ed al
ut imme lear person cted Annual S learn ativ ly, learn CO, Acco
8 diate ners nel from ly M ers e An ers RO, mlish
medi and and Form M and Ana nu and SD ment
cal pers teache 86 &E pers lysi ally pers O, repor
and onne rs and , onne s onne and t
dent l exami Form Sc l l exte
al exa nated SHN ho exa exa rnal
cons mine and 5A ol mine mine stak
ult to d treate d d ehol
com d for ders
mon comm

medi on
cal medic
and al
dent illness
al
illnes
s
Ac Cond Asse Numb Data SH Annual SD Cond Qua SH An Cond Dep Annu Annua
tivi uct ss er of colle NU O- uct ntit NU nu uct Ed al l
ty physi lear learne cted S phys ativ al phys CO, Acco
8 cal a ners rs from M ical e ical RO, mplis
nd from assess Opla M healt Ana healt SD hmen
dent 2 treate n &E h lysi h O, t
al elem d and Kalu , insp s insp and repor
healt enta referre suga Sc ectio ectio exte t
h ry d to n sa ho n2 n2 rnal
inspe and medic Dep ol elem elem stak
ction 2 al Ed entar entar ehol
in seco specia form y y ders
elem ndar lists s(For and and
entar y ms 2 2
y and scho 5A, seco seco
seco ols 5B) ndar ndar
ndar ever y y
y y scho scho
learn mon ols ols
ers th

Ac Cond Con Numb Data SH Annual SD Cond Qua SH Cond Dep Annu Annua
tivi uct duct er of colle NU O, uct ntit NU uct Ed al l
ty annu medi person cted RO medi ativ medi CO, Acco
9 al cal nel from cal e cal RO, mplis
physi cons with Form cons Ana cons SD hmen
cal ultat cardio 86 ultat lysi ultat O, t
exam ion vascul ion s ion and Repor
inati and ar and and exte t
on to bloo diseas bloo bloo rnal
non- d e, d d stak
teach work diabet work work ehol
ing up es and up up ders
and via malign via via
teach publ ancy publi publi
ing ic/pr c/pri c/pri
perso ivate vate vate
nnel part part part
ners ners ners
hip, hip, hip,
to to to
80% 80% 80%
of of of
pers pers pers
onne onne onne
l l l
Aci Cond Con Numb Deca SH Annual SD Cond Qua SH Cond Dep Annu Annua
tivi uct duct er of yed, NU O, uct ntit NU uct Ed al l
ty of of learne Missi RO of ativ of CO, Acco
10 fluori fluor rs ng, fluor e fluor RO, mplis
de ide receiv Fille ide Ana ide SD hmen
vacci vacci ed d vacci vacci O, t

natio natio fluorid Teet natio lysi natio and Repor
n to n to e h n to s n to exte t
learn lear vaccin (DM learn learn rnal
ers. ners ation FT) ers ers stak
Form ehol
s ders

Dedp 2023 2028 Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dedp 2023 2028 Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

I.

In consonance with DepEd mandates and in pursuance of Ambisyon Natin 2040,

• Allocating the best available resources according to learners’ needs.

• Capacitating teachers and instructional leaders toward child-centered

• Empowering learners to become active agents of nation-building.

In particular, the Division RACE spells out the following:

Under Capacitating (Quality), teachers and instructional leaders are capacitated

Empowering (Resiliency and Well-being) means strengthening the capacity of

DEDP 2023-2028 1 Dipolog City Division

• MAke the curriculum relevant to produce competent and job-ready, active,

DEDP 2023-2028 2 Dipolog City Division

A. CONTEXT OF DIPOLOG CITY

Table 1. Barangays of Dipolog City.

Cogon Rural Paquito L. Paño 1,982 1,665 +19.04%

Dicayas Urban Tito C. Maligro 9,974 9,618 +3.70%

Galas Urban Elmer B. Vallecer 19,508 17,540 +11.22%

DEDP 2023-2028 3 Dipolog City Division

Gulayon Urban Jodrell D. Nayal 7,896 7,359 +7.30%

Olingan Urban Ofelia G. Acis 15,258 13,250 +15.15%

Santa Isabel Urban Rodel C. Enero 7,777 7,665 +1.46%

DEDP 2023-2028 4 Dipolog City Division

City of Dipolog 138,141 130,759 +5.65%

Source: Philippine Statistics Authority – Philippine Standard Geographic Code –

DEDP 2023-2028 5 Dipolog City Division

B. BASIC EDUCATION SITUATION

Figure 1. Basic Education Statistics SY2022-2023

DEDP 2023-2028 6 Dipolog City Division

Table 2. Learning Modalities for SY 2022-2023 as of January 16, 2023.

Key Performance Indicators

Gross Enrollment Rate

Table 3. DepEd Dipolog Gross Enrollment Rates for all levels.

Kindergarten 117.33% 107.13% 95.69% 113.44%

DEDP 2023-2028 7 Dipolog City Division

(Grades 11- 102.84% 107.48% 108.67% 126.40%

Net Enrollment Rate

Kindergarten 83.47% 78.36% 72.49% 87.18%

(Grades 11- 68.66% 58.82% 62.76% 72.52%

School Leaver Rate

Table 5. DepEd Dipolog School Leaver Rate.

Elementary 0.97% 2.48% 1.75% 0.69% 0.00% 0.34%

Secondary 8.01% 8.45% 5.31% 5.57% 3.33% 4.07%

Regional Achievement Test (RAT) Mean Percentage Score (MPS)

Table 6.1. Regional Achievement Test MPS for Grades 4 and 7

50.1 44.14 49.66 50.34 44.60 44.14 40.46 45.46 56.26

64.1 58.39 50.80 57.47 54.71 55.17 53.56 55.86 56.26

Cohort Survival Rate

Table 7. DepEd Dipolog Cohort Survival Rate.

DEDP 2023-2028 9 Dipolog City Division

Table 8. DepEd Dipolog Completion Rate.

DEDP 2023-2028 10 Dipolog City Division

DEPED VISION AND MISSION

We dream of Filipinos who passionately lover their country and

Figure ____. DepEd Vision

To protect and promote the right of every Filipino to quality,

o Students learn in a child-friendly, gender-sensitive, safe

Figure ____. DepEd Mission

DEDP 2023-2028 11 Dipolog City Division

• e-APAS (Enhanced Accelerating Pupils for Access to School)

• Allocating the best available resources according to learners’ needs.

DEDP 2023-2028 12 Dipolog City Division

Figure ____. The RACE Framework

1. ACCESS (REACHING OUT)