Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reflection Paper No. 2 - My Personal Ethical Dilemma - Gil Orense
Reflection Paper No. 2 - My Personal Ethical Dilemma - Gil Orense
Gil R. Orense
The city was a beautiful place, full of life and energy, but it was also rife with corruption
contracts, I had seen my fair share of shady deals and underhanded schemes. But
nothing had prepared me for the ethical dilemma that was about to confront me.
It started when an acquaintance city mayor approached me with a request for a software
that would monitor the daily activities of all city government employees and the city
council. This posed an ethical dilemma as it involved invading the privacy of individuals
and potentially violating their rights. I was torn between fulfilling the request of the mayor
and upholding my own personal principles of respect for privacy and individual rights. On
one hand, the software would help detect any fraudulent activities and improve efficiency
in the government. On another hand, it could lead to abuse and breach of privacy and
trust among employees. But the mayor was persistent, and I knew that turning down the
project could harm my company's reputation and bottom line. So, I agreed to take it on,
of the mayor with the values and principles that were important to me. I thought back to
and transparency. These values were the foundation of my career, and I knew that
I gathered more information about the requirements of the project and the potential
consequences of creating such a software. I spoke with the city mayor regularly to
understand their reasons and consulted with legal experts to understand the legal
implications of such product. I also spoke with my employees to understand their thoughts
on the matter and the potential impact on their own work and privacy. I considered the
After gathering all the necessary information, I evaluated the potential consequences of
both fulfilling the request and denying it. I considered the ethical principles involved, such
as respect for privacy and individual rights, as well as the potential benefits of the software
I also considered the potential harm that could be caused by the software, such as a loss
of trust among employees and a breach of privacy. I weighed the potential consequences
and evaluated which option aligned best with my personal and professional ethical
principles.
I also considered alternatives such as collaborating with the city mayor and employees to
create a system that would promote transparency and accountability, while respecting
privacy and individual rights. After much evaluation, I decided to propose a compromise
in terms of the features of the product. I proposed that we develop the software with
revised functionality that would protect the privacy of the city employees and council
members. We would also implement strict security measures to prevent any unauthorized
access to the data. This would satisfy the ethical norms of transparency and
accountability while also respecting the moral principles of privacy and individual rights.
The pressure was mounting. The mayor was breathing down my neck, demanding
updates and progress reports. My employees were working tirelessly, putting in long
hours to deliver a product that met the mayor's demands. And I found myself torn between
being. The demand of the mayor, was for a software that would monitor the daily activities
of all city government employees and the city council. It was a bold and ambitious request,
one that promised to bring a new level of transparency and accountability to the city
government. However, it also raised serious concerns about privacy and the potential for
abuse.
were the foundation of my career and the bedrock of my personal identity. I knew that
sense of self-worth.
My responsibilities as the CEO of a company, were to deliver products and services that
meet the needs of my customers and stakeholders. This meant balancing the demands
of the mayor, the expectations of my employees, and the values and principles that were
important to me.
my shareholders were in conflict, and I found myself caught in the middle. I knew that I
couldn't simply dismiss the mayor's request out of hand, but I also knew that I couldn't
compromise my values and principles. I needed to find a way to reconcile these conflicting
One day, as I sat in my office, surrounded by mountains of paperwork and endless emails,
I felt my resolve crumbling. I couldn't keep going like this. I needed to make a decision,
and fast. I was seeking for guidance and clarity. Gathered the facts, researched heavily
and gathered more information. I consulted with my colleagues and experts in the field,
gathering insights and opinions. And slowly, ever so slowly, a solution began to emerge.
that would monitor the daily activities of city government employees and the city council,
but with strict limitations. We would not track their personal lives or private conversations,
and the software would be transparently available to the public if ever the official or
would not hold us liable if the software was used for unethical purposes.
It wasn't perfect, but it was a compromise that balanced the demands of the mayor with
the values and principles that were important to me. And when I presented it to the mayor,
The project went ahead, and we delivered a product that was both functional and ethically
responsible. Initially, we used the software internally to test its effectiveness and ensure
that it was operating within the agreed parameters. It took some time, but eventually, we
were confident that the software was ready for public use.
At the launch, I stood before the mayor and his department heads, feeling a mix of nerves
and excitement. I explained the software’s features and limitations, emphasizing our
commitment to transparency and ethical responsibility. And when the demonstration was
over, the room erupted in applause. We launched the software without much fanfare,
keeping the initial release low-key and limited to select departments within the city
government. It was a slow and steady rollout, but over time, the software gained popularity
holds. Would the software be used for its intended purpose, or would it be misused for
unethical or illegal activities? It was a question that weighed heavily on my mind, but one
So, I made the decision to continue monitoring the implementation of the software, even
after it had been handed over to the city. With the permission of the mayor, I assigned a
team of experts to keep an eye on its usage, looking for any signs of misuse or abuse. It
was an added expense, but one that I felt was necessary to ensure that our company's
After taking action and implementing the new system and program, it was important for
me to reflect on the decision-making process and evaluate the outcomes. This reflection
allowed me to identify areas for improvement and make any necessary adjustments to
ensure that my decision was effective and ethical. I looked back on my thoughts and
feelings during the process, considered what went well and what could have been
improved, and thought about how I would approach a similar situation in the future.
Through this reflection, I identified some of the challenges I faced in making this decision,
including the complexity of the issue and the conflicting values involved. However, I also
recognized the value of seeking feedback from key stakeholders and taking a
system and program and its impact on all stakeholders involved. This allowed me to
identify any areas for improvement and make any necessary adjustments. Overall, the
In the end, the compromise allowed us to deliver the software while also upholding ethical
principles. The revised functionality of the software satisfied the stakeholders' concerns
while also meeting the project's goals. I reflected on the experience and realized that
ethical dilemmas are not always black and white. They require careful consideration of
Over the years, the software proved to be a valuable tool for the city. It helped identify
transparency and accountability. And while there were a few instances where the
software was misused, our team was able to point it early and address the issue with the
to listen to the concerns of the stakeholders and was pleased with the revised software.
As a result, my company was able to maintain its good reputation and continue to do
up for what I believed in and making a difficult ethical decision. They supported me
throughout the process and were relieved that the outcome was favorable.
and decision-making skills. This led to an increase in trust and confidence from all
shareholders. Overall, while this personal ethical dilemma was challenging and required
and uphold ethical principles not only benefited the stakeholders involved, but also had
Looking back on that experience, I am proud of the decision that I made. It wasn't easy,
and it wasn't without cost, but it was the right thing to do. And as I watch my company
grow and thrive, I know that we are doing so on a foundation of honesty, integrity, and
-END -