Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Combined Improvements
Combined Improvements
Construction
Supervision Services
D. Oxley
5/29/2013
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Contents
What are the Objectives of Site Supervision?
References
Job Descriptions
CS-02-06 (Works Progress Reports)
CS-04-03 (Inspection Requests)
CS-04-04 (Material & Shop Drawing Review)
Site Inspection Manual Introductory Sheets
Attachments
Revised F-CS13 (Daily Site Report)
1
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
The staff needs to be fully aware of what is happening on the site at all times.
The RE needs to be fully aware of all issues from design to administration to
construction to handing over that are happening on the site.
2
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
On smaller sites the manning dictated by the Client and/or the pricing mechanism may not allow
for numerous positions - and the work load has to be shared out amongst the available staff.
The smaller scale of operations dictates that some particular aspect of the activities on site,
whether by the contractor or SDC, will not fully occupy the time of the staff member for the
whole day. Therefore, they may have to perform other activities and tasks that would normally
be carried out by others – as the staff members must remain flexible and adaptable accordingly.
The Job Descriptions that form part of the Supervision Operating Procedures have been issued
to all the staff and each has the general clause that allows for the flexibility mentioned above,
such as:
Perform the duties of other staff on site when no staff is allocated to such descriptions (if
matching his specialty) with the evaluation of the management and assistance of the
central technical services.
The summary of responsibilities from the Job Descriptions for each position is given below:
Resident Engineer: Responsible for co-ordinating with the Design Project Manager;
Senior Engineer: Responsible to co-ordinate and assign the supervision team of the
discipline construction activities on site;
Review and approve transmittals and inspect the quality of the works
executed on site.
Site Engineer: Responsible for observing all assigned work activities through
examination and verification on site;
Field Inspector: Responsible for observing all assigned work activities through
examination and verification on site;
In particular it should be remembered that the RE is the engineer on the job site who is directly
responsible for the day-to-day administration of the project. In order to be able to fulfill this role
the RE needs to be:
3
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
The duties of the RE in administering the contract include ensuring that the works are not only
technically correct by being in accordance with the contract documents (drawings and
specifications) - but are performed within the time schedule. The Resident Engineer must also
then be competent enough to carry out the following activities as part of his tasks:
Standard Operating Procedure CS-02-06 (Procedure for Work Progress Reports to Main Office)
has been issued to all the Resident Engineers and either hard copies or soft copies are with the
site staff, so all staff have been made aware of the requirements of this procedure. In fact, the
procedure is one of those that have been in circulation for many years.
There are clearly defined responsibilities and method in the text of the procedure:
4
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
4.1 The individual engineers are responsible to complete their daily reports to be used in
the compilation of the weekly and monthly reports.
6.1.1 All Site Engineers must keep daily notes of work progress and problems
encountered during the day and have available for inspection by the HSD (Head of
Supervision Department) or RE, if requested. The report is to include the activities
performed together with any discrepancies/observations that have taken place on
the day. These details are to be recorded on Daily Report Form F-CS13/A
In general, all the sites submit Monthly Reports to the Main Office, but not all submit the
Weekly Reports.
It is not know how many sites or individual engineers write a daily log, but the number is
low. This needs improvement.
Standard Operating Procedure CS-04-04 (Procedure for material & Shop Drawing Submittals
Review) has been issued to all the Resident Engineers and either hard copies or soft copies are
with the site staff, so all staff have been made aware of the requirements of this procedure. In
fact, the procedure is one of those that have been in circulation for many years.
There are clearly defined responsibilities and method in the text of the procedure:
4.4 The RE is responsible for monitoring and tracking the submittals, and ensuring the
required action is correctly performed within the times restraints of the contract
conditions.
6.1 Persons undertaking submittal review activities covered by this procedure will
familiarize themselves with the requirements of the Project Specification, Design
Drawings and other relevant documentation.
There appear to be no issues in this activity on the sites. The Quality Objective charts
indicate that the sites are returning the contractor’s submittals within the periods
allowed under the contract.
This is an activity that is carried out in the comfort of an air conditioned office working
from a desk. The review and approval of the shop drawings is carried out by the Senior
Engineer on site.
5
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Standard Operating Procedure CS-04-03 (Procedure for Inspection Requests) has been issued
to all the Resident Engineers and either hard copies or soft copies are with the site staff, so all
staff have been made aware of the requirements of this procedure. In fact, the procedure is one
of those that have been in circulation for many years.
There are clearly defined responsibilities and method in the text of the procedure:
1.1 To describe how sections of the works are subject to staged inspections prior to
release for the next stage and, eventually, completion.
4.3 The Resident Engineer and/or Site Engineers are responsible for ensuring that all
inspection activities are performed in accordance with appropriate SDC Inspection
Checklists, Design Drawings, Specifications, BoQs, approved materials and Shop
Drawings.
6.2.2 During the normal course of his day’s work the discipline engineer/inspector should
visit the site and note any items which he feels would result in non-conforming works,
if allowed to remain uncorrected. These should be pointed out to the Contractor’s
engineer at the earliest opportunity to avoid excessive abortive works at a later date.
If necessary, a Site Instruction is written.
In addition to the Standard Operating Procedure CS-04-03 (Procedure for Inspection Requests),
a Site Inspection Manual has been issued to all the Resident Engineers and either hard copies
or soft copies are with the site staff, so all staff have been made aware of the requirements of
this manual. The Site Inspection Manual was put together during early 2012 based on the
forms, etc. that have been in circulation for many years.
The following abstracts from the Introduction section of the Site Inspection Manual clearly
explain the philosophy behind the responsibilities and method of inspections:
1.1 The purpose of this manual is to standardize the level of inspections on the SDC
sites irrespective of which Engineer or Inspector is carrying out the inspection.
1.2.1 It is recognized that there is no ideal system but by using the expertise from the staff
and best practices it is hoped that a practical and useable document will result.
Remember that inspection starts at the inception of construction and ends only with
the final acceptance by the Client.
Proper inspection verifies what has been done as well as what may have been left
out.
Site Engineers and Inspectors are responsible for inspecting all assigned work
activities through examination, surveillance and verification. They are also responsible
for documenting the results of those inspections as they relate to the acceptance
criteria defined in the contract documents.
1.2.2 In order to plan for the inspection the Site Engineer/Inspector should:-
6
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
1.2.3 Whenever possible, Site Engineers/Inspectors shall evaluate the work process, as
well as the final product/installation, for compliance with established acceptance
criteria. Note that the Engineers/Inspectors are the most significant force witnessing
the jobsite activities on a daily basis, representing the Owner’s and SDC’s interest.
1.2.4 Site Engineers/Inspectors will have five basic interfaces during their day-to-day work
assignments.
A. Resident Engineer
The Site Engineers/Inspectors will receive their day-to-day work assignments and will
report on their day’s activities to the RE.
The current practice that appears to be in common use across the sites is not as
described above. The SDC Inspectors/Engineers are responding to the contractor’s
Inspection Requests and generally in the time required to meet the contractor’s schedule
but they are not carrying out the staged or continuous surveillance inspections – they
are reactive rather than pro active.
Reduces the last minute remedial works to prepare the works for final
acceptance, which invariably are not done
Allows errors to be picked up and corrected in time
Creates less friction between the Engineer/Inspector and the contractor’s staff
Flattens out the peaks and troughs of the inspection process, allowing periods
of relative inactivity to be used for pre-inspections
7
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Although it is the contractor’s responsibility to determine the means and method of construction,
the Resident Engineer and his staff should review and comment on them wherever the end
result will not be as per the contract documents or safe, etc. The Resident Engineer has a
professional and moral obligation to instruct work to be stopped until the conditions are
corrected.
In order to succeed at these tasks a Resident Engineer requires mature judgment and this is
something that cannot be taught in a classroom but is acquired by experiencing all the stages
from setting out, inspections, preparation of shop drawings, knowing materials field tests,
understanding problems of the tradesmen, knowing the language of construction. The RE must
call in expert advice when required where he lacks the relevant experience or knowledge, and
not simpler blunder through.
After being given the tools to do the tasks and the technical back-up, the Site teams must be
their own driving force in order to fulfill the Construction Supervision Services.
NOTE: It is imperative that ALL staff members realize that they are responsible for their
actions on site and will be made accountable for not complying with the new and
existing requirements.
8
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Although the contractor does generate activities for the site team through the Inspection
Requests or Monthly Evaluations, the majority of all routine site supervision needs to be carried
out by the site engineers acting on their own initiative. In order to do this, the Resident Engineer
must establish local site procedures for regular inspections and encourage his staff to maintain
a close watch on the contractor.
All discipline engineers must not only be willing to perform tasks that would normally be
performed by a junior but must overlap with other disciplines and not work on strict lines of
demarcation. This needs to be developed by the RE, and simply means that each discipline
engineer must be aware (not necessarily well versed in) of the existence of the other trades and
the likely activities. For example, the civil engineer needs to be aware that there may be
electrical conduits to be embedded in the concrete or openings for mechanical services or
sleeves for mechanical pipes through water retaining walls need to have puddle flanges or
curtain wall cladding requires inserts to be cast in.
The nature and sequence of construction activities on site dictates that it is the civil/structural
engineer who tends to take the lead role in this co-ordination process, however the other
disciplines need to play their part and be aware of the progress of construction to avoid items
being missed or positioned incorrectly.
The Resident Engineer’s main task, therefore, is to provide the leadership which will make the
team effective. A good RE will be unmistakably in charge of his team whilst recognizing that he
cannot be an expert on everything; he will keep everybody informed fully informed about what is
going on but without stifling the initiative with too many instructions; he will work hard to ensure
that each team member feels useful and busy. If the RE finds a mistake then the person on the
team should be told and allowed to correct it himself.
The Construction Supervisor’s role should not be seen as a passive and negative one. Effective
Construction Supervision requires more involvement from the SDC staff than merely reacting to
the actions and initiatives of the contractor. An effective Construction Supervision process
operates in four ways:
9
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Wherever possible sites should always be staffed with best people available – high quality
people are much more productive. The RE’s staff needs to be doers who can accomplish
multiple tasks with little or no guidance. Also the site staff should be a team of people who can
work together.
To improve the effectiveness of the site team it must be provided with adequate staff such as:
The Resident Engineer is the prime mover on a site and with competent, knowledgeable and
experienced staff he can anticipate problems before they occur and discuss with the contractor
and agree on solutions. He should study the contract documents and advise his engineers and
inspectors of what is expected from the contractor and them. He should also establish a set of
standards to be adopted by all his staff. The Resident Engineer should not set himself up as the
judge and jury and criticize the contractor for not taking up his suggestions – a good RE
assumes as many duties as his authority permits.
A good RE and his staff should be sufficiently aware of the construction processes as they are
in a position to notify the contractor that the work that is under construction would not be
approved instead of waiting until completion.
Have been more involved in the preparation of the bid documents, and he has to
work with these and deal with all the weaknesses in them.
Become more involved in the construction process after the contract is bid and
awarded
Provide the critical interface between design and construction
Be technically competent and operate with the confidence that comes from
understanding all the pieces.
Be able to converse with engineers from all disciplines to resolve problems and
to anticipate problems before they arise
Want the responsibility of the job – the buck stops with the RE
10
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Have people skills to be able to motivate, counsel and direct the human
resources.
Develop a team attitude in the staff
Display decisive leadership
Maintain diplomacy and tact in resolving issues among the Project Team
Expect results and make commitments he expects to honour
Reporting
Reporting is a vital part of the Construction Supervision services in order to have documentation
for handing over and for recording the historical events throughout the construction process.
The various types of reporting (daily, weekly & monthly) have been discussed earlier. The
weekly and monthly reports are sufficient to fulfill the needs as long as they are produced; the
daily report is to be changed to follow the format of revised form F-CS13 (attached). However,
there is a danger of loading up the RE and the site team with too much paperwork that they
have no time to visit the site for formal and informal inspections and surveillance.
Despite all the intentions and tools to perform the Construction Supervision Services not all sites
are implementing the full services. There could be several reasons for this, such as:
11
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Suggested Methods
During April 2012, the sites were visited by Construction Supervision Department Technical
Manager to roll out the new Procedures. There needs to be a similar series of visits to all the
sites as follow-up.
However, during the follow-up visits the Resident Engineer and his staff will do the talking – they
will be asked to describe how they carry out the Construction Supervision Services, including
demonstrating the use of forms. During the presentation by the RE and the engineers, questions
will be asked for clarification to demonstrate that each staff member is fully aware of the
processes.
The advantages of this will be that any issues that are not fully understood by the site staff can
be raised with the Technical Manager and the Technical Manager will be able to assess the
Resident Engineer and his staff. The ability of the staff can be appraised at the same time and
be fed back to the HR department to make recommended improvements through training or re-
assignments or promotion.
Healthy competition is good for bringing out the best efforts of staff. On a biweekly or monthly
basis the Resident Engineers only, or their designate in the absence of the RE, will meet the
Construction Supervision Management in either the Riyadh or Jeddah Office, dependent upon
location of the site.
The intention of the meeting is to have the Resident Engineers make a presentation of their
project that will include, as a minimum, the following;
Putting the Resident Engineer on the spot will mean that he will have to sharpen up his act. This
increased need to be fully conversant with the project should create a downward ripple where
the engineers on the project will also need to be sharper in order to be able to brief the RE.
The exercise will also be useful practice for the Resident Engineer in giving presentations and to
be able to think on his feet when having to answer questions.
12
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
Under the ISO 9001 system Diyar has had Bureau Veritas train and certify selected members of
its staff to perform Internal Audits on the Quality Management System. A similar scheme needs
to be instigated where selected engineers from various disciplines are trained to carry out audits
of the sites covering the practical aspects of the implementation of the Construction Supervision
Services.
For example: the Internal Audit will verify that the works are inspected on site by checking the
logs of the inspection requests (IRs) and carrying out spot checks to the IR file to see that the
information, dates, signatures, follow-up revision numbering, etc. are all correct. What the
proposed audit will do is have an auditor shadow the engineer/inspector in order to witness how
the inspection is carried out, whether all aspects are covered under the inspection, whether the
engineer/inspector is demonstrating that he has the knowledge and experience to perform the
inspection, whether the output of the inspection is protecting the Client’s & Diyar’s interests and
is not damaging the contractor either money-wise or schedule-wise.
Simultaneously, the time spent performing inspections will give feedback as to whether the site
team will be capable of meeting the contractor’s schedule with the available manning.
The ability of the staff can be appraised at the same time and be fed back to the HR department
to make recommended improvements through training or re-assignments or promotion.
Multiple daily walks around the site are required to be carried under the existing procedures
and, quite frankly, something that a responsible engineer should not even need reminding
about.
The site engineer is obligated to carry out the daily tours, but the Resident Engineer and the
senior discipline Engineers also need to allocate time in their daily routines to this task. The
benefits to each or the consequences of not carrying out the task need to be explained
otherwise it will become low priority and not done.
The method for confirmation that the site tours are taking place is needed, and this could be by
including comments on the Observations section on the Daily Site Report (F-CS13).
Daily Reports
Daily reports are a must under the existing procedures. The daily reports submitted by the
individual are for the use of the Resident Engineer and need to be kept at the site, in order for
him to compile the monthly report for Management. It the Resident Engineer as the manager of
his site team that needs to be made the responsible entity for ensuring this task is performed – it
is for his benefit. Assuming 100 engineers throughout the sites and each sending a daily report
13
Improvements to Construction Supervision Services
to the main office, then it will take one person a full day to read them all. In addition, if reports
are not submitted it is an extra task on the main office personnel to chase.
A daily report from the Resident Engineer that has been compiled from individual reports from
the site team (F-CS13) sent to the main office for review is a much more manageable task. It
also puts the RE in the driving seat for all activities on the site.
The taking on of new staff is a lottery, especially when it is based on a short interview, unless
the candidate is known to the company or somebody who works in the company. Many
candidates have enough knowledge to get through the interview but not enough experience to
sustain them through the actual job requirements.
Candidates are often recruited because there is an immediate shortage which means that they
are often thrown in at the deep end. The staff on site will often be too busy with their own tasks
to guide and/or teach the new recruit, so the new recruit struggles through. In many cases he
will survive and not much damage will be done to the company’s reputation, in other cases he
will struggle to the detriment of the company.
It is far better to bring all new recruits up to a minimum standard and awareness of the Diyar
system by putting them through an orientation course on the procedures and systems used
within Diyar.
14
Daily Site Report
Project Title and No. Report No.
Observations on Labor/Materials/Plant/Equipment/Submittals
F-CS13/B