Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VAIL-20-129-S-009 - Integrity Management of Pipelines and Flowlines - Rev. A
VAIL-20-129-S-009 - Integrity Management of Pipelines and Flowlines - Rev. A
Approved by:
DOCUMENT TITLE:
INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT OF PIPELINES AND FLOWLINES
Revision History
The table below is a brief summary of the most recent revisions to this document. Details of all revisions
are held on file by the issuing department.
Revision
Date Originator Reviewed by Approved by Remarks
No.
Issued for
A December 2021 M. Hassnain Azhar Gul Ijaz Rao
approval
ISO
Procedure
9001:2015 ISO SOP
Clause
Clauses Clause Description Clause Description
Ref.#
Ref.#
4 Context of the Organization
5 Leadership
Organizational Roles,
5.3 6 Roles and Responsibilities
Responsibilities and Authorities
6 Planning
7 Support
8 Operation
9 Performance Evaluation
2.0
89T 89T OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................................................... 6
89T 89T
3.0
89T 89T SCOPE ................................................................................................................................... 6
89T 89T
4.0
89T 89T 89T ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS .................................................................................. 6 89T
4.1
89T 89T 89T Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. 6
89T
4.2
89T 89T Definitions ................................................................................................................... 8
89T 89T
5.0
89T 89T REFERENCES AND STANDARDS ........................................................................................ 9
89T 89T
5.1
89T 89T Codes and Standards ................................................................................................. 9
89T 89T
5.2
89T 89T OGDCL References..................................................................................................... 9
89T 89T
6.0
89T 89T ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ......................................................................................... 9
89T 89T
7.0
89T 89T PLANNING ........................................................................................................................... 12
89T 89T
7.1
89T 89T Integrity Work Plan ................................................................................................... 12
89T 89T
7.2
89T 89T Integrity Status Determinations ............................................................................... 12
89T 89T
7.3
89T 89T Emergency Response .............................................................................................. 12
89T 89T
7.4
89T 89T Management of Change............................................................................................ 12
89T 89T
7.5
89T 89T Data Management ..................................................................................................... 12
89T 89T
7.6
89T 89T Corrosion Monitoring Plan ....................................................................................... 13
89T 89T
7.7
89T 89T Inspection Monitoring Plan ...................................................................................... 13
89T 89T
8.0
89T 89T RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................... 13
89T 89T
9.0
89T 89T INSPECTION PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS / CERTIFICATIONS .................................. 13
89T 89T
11.7.1 Remnant Life Assessment and Fitness for Service Assessment ...................... 26
89T 89T 89T 89T
APPENDICES:
Maximum allowable Maximum allowable operating pressure refers to the wall strength of
operating pressure a pressurized pipeline and how much pressure the walls may safely
(MAOP) hold in normal operation.
May Within this document means possible method or action.
Pipeline MOL / Spur lines / Transfer lines / Export lines usually refers to a
pipeline that transfers gas, crude oil, gasoline or other finished
product from a processing facility or storage facility to another
location e.g. another processing facility, storage facility, refinery,
chemical plant or end user.
Risk The qualitative or quantitative likelihood of an accidental or
unplanned event occurring considered in conjunction with the
potential consequence of such a failure. In quantitative terms, risk is
the quantified probability of a defined failure mode times its quantified
consequence.
Risk Assessment Risk Assessment is the process of identifying the consequences of
the worst case credible scenario arising from the occurrence of a
hazardous event together with estimating the likelihood of that
scenario occurring.
Engineering Department
Technical Department
Integrity Department
Inspection Engineer
Corrosion Engineer
Field Service Team
Leader
ACTIVITY / TASK
Field Preparation /
A I C C C R I
Access Provision
Prepare corrosion
monitoring &
inspection monitoring A C I R R R I C C I
plans for pipelines &
flowlines
Carry out pipeline &
flowlines inspection A C I R R R I C C I
activity
Prepare and Review
A C C R R R C C I
Report
Review and Evaluate
A C C R R R C C I
Anomalies
Register anomalies in
Anomaly System A C I R R R C I R
(ATS), if required
Implement MOC/DGS,
A C R C C C C C I
if required
Propose amendments
to integrity A C I R R R C C I
management activity
Update integrity
A C I R R R I I
management plan
Schedule next activity A R I R R R I I C
MANAGING
RISK ASSESSMENT
INFORMATION
INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT
INSPECTION AND PROCESS REPAIRS AND
SURVEILLANCE MODIFICATIONS
PROCESS AND
INTEGRITY
CONDITION
ASSESSMENT
MONITORING
MITIGATION MEASURES
Sr. Sources of
Type of Data
No. Data
Pipeline Segment Name/ ID
Pipeline Route Coordinates
Design,
Material, and Pipe Material Grade
1
Construction Nominal Pipe Diameter
Data
Nominal Pipe Wall Thickness
Design Pressure
Sr. Sources of
Type of Data
No. Data
Flowline Segment Name/ID
Design, Flowline Route Coordinates
Material, and
1 Pipe Material Grade
Construction
Data Nominal Pipe Diameter
Nominal Pipe Wall Thickness
SECTIONING
THREAT IDENTIFICATION
CONSEQUENCE OF
PROBABILITY OF FAILURE
FAILURE
RISK EVALUATION
Where:
P is the PoF
C is the CoF
1 to N is threat category
Corrosion
O 2 Corrosion
R R
Material Selection e.g. Inhibition and
Internal Corrosion Resistant
1 H 2 S Corrosion Biocide treatment.
Corrosion Alloy, Corrosion
R R
Galvanic Corrosion
Crevice Corrosion
Soil Corrosion (Coating
A.C. Corrosion Coating, Cathodic rehabilitation plan)
External
2 D.C. Stray Current Protection, CIPS &
Corrosion Stray Current
Corrosion DCVG
Mitigation
Atmospheric
Corrosion
MIC
Environmentally Hydrogen-induced
Cracking
3 Assisted Material Selection
Stress Corrosion
Cracking Cracking
Surveillance
Right-of-way
Marking
Burial Public awareness,
Third Party Impact,
Mechanical e.g. Excavator, Design Factor Impact protection,
4 Large scale
Damage Vehicle Impact, Protection Slabs, Berm
Vandalism exercise (Mock
& Markers
drill
demonstration)
and pipeline
patrolling
Earthquake,
Natural Routing River Bank Civil
5 Landslide, River
Hazards Backfill Selection Works
Crossing Scour
Tolerance band
Aspect Leading KPI
Green Amber Red
Maintenance –
Pipeline/flowline Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
repairs
Maintenance - Pig
Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
traps
Inspection - CP
Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
surveys
Inspection - ILIs Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
Inspection - On-
Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
stream inspections
Inspection - UT wall
thickness and pit
Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
gauge
measurements
Inspection -
Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
Temporary repairs
Corrosion monitoring Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
Chemical injection
(at least corrosion
inhibitor, oxygen Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
scavenger and
biocide) monitoring
Operational pigging
for dewatering / Actual vs. Planned 100% >95% <95%
debris removal
Function/Criteria Verification
Risk level
Class Potential Impact
Rating
Risk level
Class Safety Environment Economics
Rating
Multiple Fatality Massive Effect Damage >
5 E
1000k USD.
Single Fatality Major Effect Damage
4 D between 500k -
1000k USD
Major Injury Localized Effect Damage
3 C between 100-
500k USD
Slight Injury Minor Effect Damage <
2 B
100K USD
No Injury Slight Effect Slight Damage
1 A
or loss
RISK MATRIX
P&ID REFERENCES:
YES NO
Have the pig trap(s) been subject to a thorough inspection at this time?
APPURTENANCES
36. Bunding
Was a pressure test (strength test or leak test) carried out? YES NO
If answered ‘NO’ to above question, then this part of the Inspection Report is completed.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Suggestions:
Phone:
TC (IO) Actions
Recd.:
Comments: