Professional Documents
Culture Documents
False Rape Accussations Red Flags
False Rape Accussations Red Flags
False Rape Accussations Red Flags
Victimology
Barbie Underwood
The sheer number of allegations made against the suspect were astonishing. The graphic
detail reported involving the alleged rape were an indicator. In just one allegation, the
supposed suspect beat the accuser, forced her to open a condom wrapper, raped her,
urinated on her, and then beat her again. Other allegations of the entire family stalking
injury
The pseudo-victim was reported showing up to her place of employment, a police station,
with multiple bruises on her body, which she claimed was from her husband. In reality,
the pseudo-victim would run into objects around the house, fall, or overall be known as
3. The pseudo-victim presents in such a way that people believe no one would do this
to himself or herself.
The pseudo-victim presented herself as “clumsy.” She reported to her husband and her
husband’s family that she had a medical condition that caused her to be this way.
the police. Several emergency calls noted that the pseudo-victim would state that a week
ago, the suspect’s family would break into her residence, or cut the power to her
residence. The reports of rape and/or domestic violence also were dated well after the
5. A stranger is accused
The pseudo-victim also accused the suspect’s father of domestic violence. She also
accused the suspect’s other family members of harassment. Years prior, the pseudo-
6. The pseudo-victim claims that overwhelming force was used, or that he or she
The pseudo-victim made accusations that the suspect used several objects to beat her. She
made claims of urination as well by the suspect and that the suspect overpowered her
multiple times. Multiple assailants were accused when the pseudo-victim accused other
This varies on each report made by the pseudo-victim. Some accounts are very graphic
and detailed, mostly in regard to the sexual assault and domestic violence. Other
8. The pseudo-victim reports having his or her eyes closed during the attack or was
unconscious or passed out or has no memory of what happened or was drugged, and
The pseudo-victim gives graphic details of each assault, so this is not the case.
several pictures on the pseudo-victim’s phone after the alleged attacks. The pseudo-
victim also continued to work regularly and socialize with her coworkers after the
attacks.
10. The expected laboratory findings are absent
11. The pseudo-victim is vague about the location of the assault, or there is no evidence
The pseudo-victim is documented stating that most of the assaults, if not all, occurred in
the victim and suspect’s residence. Investigations of the residence were not noted, so
possibly there was no follow up of the pseudo-victim’s account of the alleged attack.
13. There are escalating personal problems in the life of the pseudo-victim
The pseudo-victim accused another male years ago in high school. The findings were
inconsistent, and no charges were ultimately filed against the alleged attacker.
16. The pseudo-victim is documented to appear “happy” by the investigator after viewing
The pseudo-victim is documented through text message stating that she does not “like”
the investigator asking questions and does not want to speak with said investigator again.
18. When the pseudo-victim talks to the authorities, he or she tends to steer the
explaining that her relationship with the alleged suspect was “rocky.”
19. There is writing on the body of the pseudo-victim
The pseudo-victim reported sexual assault years ago when she was in high school. She
accused her friend’s father of sexual assault against her and also sexual assault against his
daughters.
The pseudo-victim is documented stating to the alleged suspect’s family that she has a
The BAFRI
to a female investigator.
2. A female victim’s husband, boyfriend or other intimate partner has forced her to
report the alleged crime, rather than having reported the crime on her own
The pseudo-victim casually reported the abuse to her new coworkers, who happened to
be law enforcement. Her new partner was also a member of law enforcement.
3. A victim’s parents have forced him or her to report the alleged crime
4. A victim, most often underage has returned home after his or her curfew
The pseudo-victim was reported to stay out late with her new coworkers by her husband.
the day
The pseudo-victim once was unsure about the alleged attacker, but later on stated that she
knew it was her husband. There were no specific reports of a masked offender in the
The pseudo-victim was not known to be pregnant nor forced to report the crime by
9. A victim cannot describe the suspect nor provide details of the crime.
The pseudo-victim could describe the suspect and provided vivid details of the crime.
10. A victim has previously been charged with falsely reporting an incident
The pseudo-victim has not been previously charged but has made accusations in the past
regarding sexual assault that ended with no charges being filed on the alleged suspect.
The pseudo-victim has previously reported a crime of sexual assault years ago when she
12. A victim focuses on relocating to a new home or apartment during the investigation
The pseudo-victim stayed in her current residence. This residence was built by the
alleged attacker when the pseudo-victim was married to the alleged attacker.
13. A victim focuses on initiating a lawsuit or on monetary gain during the investigation
The pseudo-victim at the time of the report did not specify that she was initiating a
lawsuit for monetary gain. However, once she confessed to making false accusations, she
of erratic, typical behavior of victims was not noted at the time of the investigations.
15. A victim cries at crucial points in the interview to avoid answering key questions
There was no reported history of mental illness with the victim, although she did show
The pseudo-victim was working at a police station. Pressure to report could have been a
factor when the pseudo-victim explained her bodily injuries to her coworkers.
The pseudo-victim stated that the assaults took place at the residence of the pseudo-
4. Vague description of the assailant when descriptions of other facets of the crime are
more detailed
documented stating that she “knew” it was the alleged attacker yet could not accurately
give a statement to as why other than she “knew” it was him. The recounts of the crime,
5. Interest of the complainant more directed to a goal other than the reporting of the
residence owned by the alleged attacker, moving in her new partner and his children.
Reports of rape and domestic violence were not to provide an alibi, but to provide the