Summary Judgment

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

X

Enter MOA JID

Claim other than O13 r1-5


Pre- 14 days O13 r6 (as if D had entered appearance)— i. Where it is unnecessary to proceed (the D complied/ satisfied with the claim),
enter judgment for costs by NOA ( O13 r6(2)
requisite
ii. to proceed with the action:-
-D enter a. enter JID of defence (O19 r7)
MOA SOD b. Summary Judgment (SJ-O14/O81)

-SOC NOA (inter-partes)[form 57]


served Affidavit in Support [form 13] Prima facie case
(verify d claim, p’s belief that no defence, (granted application)
-Affidavit
Explanation of delay): O14 r2(3) Judgment O14 r3
complied Burden shifted to D
with O14
r2 To set aside (challenge) Hearing

Affidavit in Reply -B4 Judge (dismissed application


-judge look at
Served on D *Show triable issue/ Leave to defend
whole
*Some other reason ought to be tried situation w/t (conditional/
(O14 r4(3) D has real and unconditional)
To file defence/ proceed in proceeding bona fide
defence

Trial
Triable Issue
-disclosed in the Affidavit evidence
-Depending on the fact or law arising from each case
-D to show on merit, he has a good defence to the claim. It is not enough for D to merely deny the amount owed but plead any salient and relevant facts
which negative the existence of the debt.
-the dispute is as to facts which is to be tried.
-any other circumstances showing reasonable ground of a bona fide defence.
-the defence only needed to raise a single triable issue
For example:
(i) D raised the issue of the genuineness as to their signature in the guarantee document. (Ng Yik Seng v Perwira Habib)
(ii) D raised the issue as to the mental capacity of D to contract (Chemsource (M) Sdn Bhd v Udanis Mohammad)
(iii) Issue of limitation as to determine whether or not the cause of action had accrued on that particular date (AmBank (M) Bhd v Metroplex Sdn
Bhd)

Some other reason ought to be tried


-there is no triable issue but granting SJ may not be appropriate.
Cases: Miles v Bull, Concentrate Engineering Pte Ltd v UMBC Bhd, Bank Fur Gemeinwirtschaft v City of London Garrages, Ng Seng Kee v Danaharta Urus
Sdn Bhd,
Include other circumstances e.g. D raises set off or counterclaim (connected with subject matter of P’s claim), construction of statute or document (which
requires further facts to construed such documents or statute)

You might also like