Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sajjad Usman, 00611764, Cardiff School of Certified Professional, 1297
Sajjad Usman, 00611764, Cardiff School of Certified Professional, 1297
Sajjad Usman, 00611764, Cardiff School of Certified Professional, 1297
Declaration: By submitting this assessment (Parts 1 – 4) for marking I declare that it is entirely my own work. I understand that falsely claiming that
the work is my own is malpractice and can lead to NEBOSH imposing severe penalties (see the NEBOSH Malpractice Policy for further information).
Important note: You must refer to the document ‘Unit IG2: risk assessment – Guidance and information for learners and Learning Partners’ while
completing all parts of this assessment. Learning Partner should provide you with a copy, but it can also be downloaded from the relevant resources
section for this qualification on the NEBOSH website.
Part 1: Background
Hazard Who might be harmed What are you already What further controls/actions Time scales
category and how? doing? are required? for further Responsible
and hazard actions to be person’s job
completed title
(within …)
1. Load Forklift operator and the Personal protective 1. Conveyor belt system must 1 month Transport
handling workers work near forklift equipment’s like helmet and installed that carry material manager( res
equipment machine gloves already provided the from one place to another. ponsible for
forklift operator. action 1,3
Turnover of The forklift operator carry and 4
forklift due to heavy load and overloaded 2. Should load the forklift 1 day
overloading which result balance machine by their safe work
of forklift doesn’t well, this can cause load level.
of accident. This accident Safety officer
could have broken his legs, responsible
head injuries and small cuts 3. Only third party certified for action 2
on body. person can operate a 1 week and 5.
forklift machine.
HSE
4. Must inspect the area of 2 days supervisor
forklift machine no responsible
potholes present in the for action 6
way of forklift machine.
.
2. Electricity Site supervisor, machine Safety rubber gloves 1. Must replace the damaged 3 week
operator and all other provided the machine wire of Trulzschler TD-8 Site
Electrocution workers that work near operator. machine and installed supervisor
due to machine double insulated wire with responsible
damage wire machine. for action 1
of Trulzschler The machine operator use and 2
TD-8 the Trulzschler TD-8
Machine machine which wire is 2. Should installed fuse 1 week
totally damaged and may system with machine.
be electrocution of Safety officer
operators and others responsible
worker happen and result 3. On daily basis pre use for action 3,
burning of skin, damage of inspection of machine 2 days 4 and 6
nervous system and death must performed.
due to high voltage of
machine.
4. Once a week full HSE
maintenance of machine supervisor
performed in which responsible
machine wire quality and 1 week for action 5
their motor check.
4. Slip and Site supervisor, visitors and Proper lightening already 1. Instead of using mug to
Trip all other workers that work installed in the walking area carry oil should use top 1 week Site
in machine operating from where worker walk. close buckets to carry oil supervisor
Oil is spread section for generator filling. responsible
in the way of for action 1
pedestrian Safety gloves provided the and 2
path The worker carry generator workers already 2. Slip resistance shoes must
oil in mugs and fill the be provided all the workers 5 days
generator and some oil fall that work in machine
in the pedestrian walkway section. Safety officer
and the walkway is slippery responsible
and result slipping of for action 3
workers and they face 3. On daily basis should 1 day and 4
multiples consequences clean the area.
like bruises, bone fracture
5. Working at Site Supervisor, welder, Safety helmet already 1. Should installed the guard 2 week Site
height helpers and all other provide the workers that work rail around the scaffold. supervisor
workers that work near at height. responsible
Welder weld scaffold for action 1
guard rail on 2. Full body harness must be 1 week and 2
second floor given the workers that
with the help The welder weld the guard Proper training regarding work on scaffold.
of unguarded rail on second floor by work at height provide the Safety officer
scaffold using unguarded scaffold workers that performed work responsible
which may result falling of at height activity 3. Permit to work must be 1 week for action 4,5
worker and material and issue before staring of and 6
result many problems face work at height activity
9. Manual Worker only Safety gloves and shoes 1. Forklift truck should be 3 week Site
handling already provided the workers given for carry heavy net supervisor
The worker carry heavy net rolls into swing machine responsible
Worker carry rolls manually and dumb area. for action 1
heavy net near swing machine during only
rolls the transporting of net may
manually net rolls fall and during 2. Proper training regarding 2 week
dumb into carry load many problems manual handling must be Safety officer
near swing may face by worker like provided the workers. responsible
machine back pain, Musculoskeletal for action 3
disorder, bone fracture and only
Injuries of legs and arm. 3. Company should lift only 1 day
that weight from worker
which worker lift easily.
HSE
Collision of The forklift and people 2. Traffic route design should 2 weeks
vehicle and moving in mill area in a Regular maintenance of be built and should provide
people due same path and there is no forklift vehicle performed knowledge every workers Safety officer
to no proper proper path way for vehicle already about traffic route. responsible
path way for and workers that may for action 3
forklift and cause collision of workers and 5
pedestrian and result bone fracture, 3. “Vehicle area” Sign board 1 day
moving bruises, deep injuries and must installed.
death by high speed
collision of fork lift and HSE
worker 4. Should provide proper supervisor
training to forklift operator 2 week responsible
1. Must replace the damaged wire of Trulzschler TD-8 machine and installed double insulated
Action
wire with machine. (Electricity).
Specific legal arguments The ILO C167- safety and health in construction convention 1988, clearly mention that it is
employer responsibility to protect live cables from electricity shock hazard and installed cables
which are fully insulated and same convention article 26 mention it is employer responsibility to
fully maintenance the electric cables and provide safe system to workers.
Also Pakistan factories act 1934 Article 33-l bound employer to check the machine parts like
cables and motors and if it defective then replace it and give worker healthy environment.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity Likelihood of harm occurring is very high because maintenance electric team come daily and
check machine brake down. And works four to five hours in a shift. In this team 20 people
involved and all are at high risk when they contact with highly damaged machine wire, due to
no proper supervision increases likelihood of hazrd
I categories the severity into four categories:
Minimal: minor injuries/ no property loss
Minor: first aid required in injuries/ very low level of property loss.
Major: loss time injuries/ high loss of property.
Catastrophic: permanent disability or death/ irreplaceable property loss.
The severity lies between major to catastrophic. The maintenance work team those attend
machine brake down without isolation power of supply. When the maintenance team work and
they may face electric current due to damage wire then they may get serious injuries like body
burning, side paralysis, nervous system damage and death by paralysis of heart due to high
voltage. Also due to short circuit the machine is totally damage. So this severity is in between
major to catastrophic.
1. Should built separate ventilated area for storage of diesel drum. (Fire)
Action
Specific legal arguments According to ILO C167 Article 29 it is a responsibilities of employer to make sure a separated area
for flammable material like solid, liquid and gases that catch fire and to protect their worker from fire
hazard.
Also ILO Recommendation R164-occupational safety and health clearly mention that it is employer
responsibility to protect explosive material from heat and fire.
According to Pakistan factories act 1934 article 33-L clearly mention that employer must barricade
the area where explosive material place and no heat activity performed near flammable material.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The likelihood of this hazard is very high because during the break time workers continuously
smoke near the area where diesel drum place, and also there is no sufficient control to fire like fire
extinguishers. And also 70 workers work in area that performed 10 hours duty and all are at high
risk of fire. So this hazard has very high likelihood.
I categories the severity into four categories:
Minimal: minor injuries/ no property loss
The severity lies between major to catastrophic. The worker smoke near diesel drum and there is
no barricading around diesel drum and this may cause explosion when smoke spark hit diesel
drums and result burning of workers body, permanent disability and death occur and also with that
the mill machines are destroy totally.
How effective the action is likely to be in
By develop separated ventilated area for diesel drum storage result no direct contact of worker
controlling the risk. This should include:
smoke spark and diesel drum and smoke spark not hit diesel drums by this way no explosion and
the intended impact of the action; fire occur.
justification for the timescale that you To accomplish this target I give 3 week timescale. The site supervisor talk to company general
indicated in your risk assessment; manager and agree him for importance of separated ventilated area for diesel drum storage then
and proper documentation proceed and company hire certified contractor that built separated area for
whether you think the action will fully diesel drum storage. So in all documentation and proceeding three week spend.
control the risk.
By my opinion by taken this step the action may not fully control hazard, for control hazard fully
regular supervision of storage area and separated area for smoking of worker is necessary.
1. Should installed the guard rail around the scaffold. (Work at Height)
Action
Specific legal arguments The ILO Recommendation R175 state that “Every scaffold should be properly design and
fully maintain for prevent of collapse”. The working platform of scaffold are fully protected
and must guardrail around scaffold.
Also the Article 18 of ILO Convention C167 clearly mention that it is employer prime
responsibility to take suitable steps to protect workers that work on height the scaffold is
fully guarded so worker protect from falling during height.
Consideration of likelihood AND severity The likelihood of this hazard is very high the worker performed welding at height on scaffold without
guard rail and also no body harness given the workers and they performed continuously welding
The severity lies between major to catastrophic. The worker work on scaffold and there is no guard
rail around scaffold and maybe worker and material fall from height and result many consequences
face by workers like head injuries, bone fracture and death. Also with that the material fall from
height is fully damaged and unrecoverable.
How effective the action is likely to be in
The action protect the workers from falling from height by installing of guard rail around the scaffold
controlling the risk. This should include:
protect the workers and also material from falling from the height. The guard rail hold the workers
the intended impact of the action; from falling from height.
justification for the timescale that you For completion of this action I give 2 week time period because the site supervisor talk to general
indicated in your risk assessment; manager of company and then they issue financial budget to purchase guard rail. Then company
and hire certified contractor that installed guard around scaffold so 1 week spend in this action.
whether you think the action will fully
control the risk. For my opinion the action may not fully control hazard by fully control hazard must provide full body
harness to the worker and also installed safety net under scaffold.
Part 4: Review, communicate and check
Suggested word counts for each section:
Planned review date or period and reasoning for this: 50 - 100 words
How the risk assessment findings will be communicated and who needs to know the information: 100 - 150 words
Follow up on the risk assessment: 100 - 150 words.
Planned review date/period with It is include in company, I will review risk assessment after 1 year on 29 November 2022. Other state to review
reasoning the risk assessment, If I will change new equipment and material then I will review risk assessment. If I will
change work procedure before 29 November 2022 then I review risk assessment. If I changed mall policy and
legal standard then I will review my risk assessment. Suddenly any accident or incident and maybe I will hire a