Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sap Report
Sap Report
[
Of Residential Building
Designed & Submitted By:Janasewa Engineering Client’s Name: Bhupendra Bahadur Singh
Conultancy pvt ltd., Dhangadhi Client’s Address: Dhangadhi-03
Chapter 1 Table of Contents
List of Tables iv
List of Figuresv
Table 10: Limit State Load Combinations used in Code-based Design ........................................................ 20
Location : Dhangadhi-03,
Bhadhera
Plinth Area : 927.7 square ft.
Shape : Rectangular
The main objectives of the work were to perform the structural design of the building in terms
of suitability of the structural system, cost effectiveness, efficient use of materials and other
resources, conformance to the acceptable building codes, standards and established
engineering practices, with special emphasis on the effects due to earthquakes and other
applicable demands.
The scope of work is divided into two phases.
2) Create finite element models of the structure with varying complexities and refinements
as suitable to understand the response.
3) Carry out an analysis and design of the structure, progressively using linear-static
techniques.
4) Carry out detailed design and prepare structural design drawings.
The structural design is based primarily on the current Standards of Indian & Nepal codes,
which is prevailingly adopted for the structural design of the buildings in Nepal.
The basic building codes to be referred are listed below which were followed for structural
design, also indicating their area of application.
Table 2:Codes and Standards
SAP2000 version 22 was used for the linear static analysis and design of three-dimensional
structures, in which the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure was
adequate for the calculation of the significant features of structures.
The structural elements of reinforced concrete were designed to Limit State Theory, while the
structural steel elements were designed to the Permissible Stress Theory. The major structural
elements were automatically designed in the programmer to IS 456 for reinforced concrete
structures elements, while the certain design calculations for those not properly figured due to
the limitation of program were manually carried out in accordance with the relevant latest
standards.
Vb = A h*W
Where, Ah is design horizontal acceleration spectrum value as per 6.4.2 , using the fundamental
natural period Ta as per 7.6 in the considered direction of vibration; and
W = seismic weight of the building
T = 0.075 h 0.75
Where
h = Height of building
No of storey 3
Importance factor(I):
Importance factor for the calculation of seismic is taken as on the following type
Table 3: Importance factor
Zone factore(z):
zone factors for different regions are given in below table and region
Zone II III IV V
4.2 Concrete
The minimum compressive, used in different types of structural components are shown in the
following table.
(MPa) (MPa)
NBC 102 :1994 Footings 20 20
Minimum yield strength of reinforcing steel to be used in the design is shown in the following
table.
Table 5 :Yield Strength of Reinforcing steel
(MPa) (MPa)
This chapter presents the finite element modeling of the building, including modeling
assumptions of materials, sections, and components properties.
5.2.1 Beams
Frame elements were used in modeling of beams, which includes the effects of bending, torsion,
axial deformation, and shear deformations. Insertion points and end offsets were applied to
account for the finite size of beam and column intersections, if required. The end offsets may
be made partially or fully rigid based on engineering judgment to model the stiffening effect
that can occur when the ends of an element were embedded in beam and column intersections.
Chapter 6 Loads
6.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the design loads considered in the structural design, including gravity
loads and seismic loads.
Self-weight of the structure was considered as dead load and finishes and partitions were
considered as imposed dead load. Live load was determined in accordance with occupancy or
use. The following loads are in addition to the self-weight of the structure. The minimum
loading requirements were taken from NS 101-1994.
The seismic load is applied to the building with auto lateral load pattern in ETABS 2018
as per IS 1893-2016. This load case is assumed static linear and all the necessary data are
given as per the following conditions.
To determine the seismic load, it is considered that the country lies in the seismic zone V
according to IS 1893:2016. The soil type is considered as soft with 5% damping to determine
average response acceleration. The building is analyzed as moment resisting frame without
consideration of infill wall. Therefore, the fundamental time period Ta is obtained by using the
following formula:
Ta = 0.075h0.75[Cl.7.6.1, IS 1893 -2016]
Response Reduction Factor = 5 for special RC moment resisting frame (SMRF) [Table 9, Cl
7.2.6, IS 1893 -2016]
The seismic weight is determined based on the following mass source. (Table 10, Cl.7.3.1, IS
1893 (Part 1):2016)
1 Dead Load 1
Limit State Method design load combinations used in code-based design are shown in the
following table.(Ref: IS 1893:2002)
Table 9: Limit State Load Combinations used in Code-based Design
1 1.5(DL+LL)
2 1.2(DL+LL±EL)
3 1.5(DL±EL)
4 0.9DL ± 1.5 EL
LL = Live load
EL = Earthquake load
Live load was not included in the mass calculations.
Zone Factor(Z)
Seismic Zone II III IV V
Very
Seismic Intensity Low Moderate Severe Severe
Z 0.1 0.16 0.24 0.36
Importance Factor
Building Type Residential Commercial/Public
Factor(I) 1 1.5
Hard Soft
Properties Soil/Rock Medium Soil Soil
No of storey 3
Height of Floor 3.048 m
Total Building height for time period calculation= 9.144 m
Sa/g 2.5
horizontal seismic
coeff(Ah)= 0.09
Seismic weight of building(W)= 2235.89 From SAP results
Seismic base
shear(Vb)= Ah*W= 201.23 kN
The structural components were designed to satisfy the strength and ductility requirements.
Strength capacities for different types of actions considered in the design are summarized in
the table below.
Table 11: Component and Member Design
Drift check(Y-direction)
Storey LoadCase height(m) Absolute Drift(mm) Relative Drift(mm) permissible drift check
Ground EqX 3.048 0 0 12.192 OK
1st EqX 3.048 4.19 4.19 12.192 OK
2nd EqX 3.048 8.83 4.64 12.192 OK
3rd EqX 3.048 12.1 3.27 12.192 OK
Overall height = 9.144
Max drift = 14.68
Permissible drift = 36.576 Safe
Drift check(X-direction)
Storey LoadCase height(m) Absolute Drift(mm) Relative Drift(mm) permissible drift check
Ground EqY 3.048 0 0 12.192 OK
1st EqY 3.048 5.33 5.33 12.192 OK
2nd EqY 3.048 11.32 5.99 12.192 OK
3rd EqY 3.048 14.68 3.36 12.192 OK
The concrete column was designed using various sections with reference IS 456. The minimum
size of column was designed considering the ductile detailing with reference to IS 13920.
Section input to be provided is as shown in below diagrams
Foundation was designed as an isolated footing. The dimension of the foundation was
calculated based on 150 kN/m2 soil bearing capacity. The thickness of 450 mm footing was
used for the foundation. The thickness was checked under punching shear and size of footing
was determined considering nominal load transfer mechanism from the column to foundation
below.
IS 1893: 2016 clause 7.7.5.3 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis should be
such that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the
total seismic mass of the structure. Analysis was carried out for first 10 modes so that the mass
participation satisfies this criterion in both orthogonal directions.
8.1.1 Introduction:
This chapter presents the finite element modeling of the building as mansion in chapter 2,
including modeling assumptions of materials, sections, components properties and design and
result of the building
Design of footing A
Assumed width of strap footing (mm) 355
Maximum Bending Moment (KNm) 227.069
Width of pedestal on each side of column at top (mm) 0
Calculated Depth of footing @ center (mm) 291.177
Adopted depth of footing @ center(mm) 509
Assumed effective cover(mm) 50
Overall depth of footing slab(mm) 559
Assumed overall depth of slab at edges(mm) 200
Effective depth of slab at edges(mm) 150
Design of footing B
Assumed width of strap footing (mm) 355
Width of pedestal on each side of column at top (mm) 0
Maximum Bending Moment (KNm) 174.084
Calculated Depth of footing @ center (mm) 255
Adopted depth of footing @ center(mm) 550
Assumed effective cover(mm) 50
Overall depth of footing slab(mm) 600
Assumed overall depth of slab at edges(mm) 200
Effective depth of slab at edges(mm) 150
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Diameter of bar (mm) 12
Area(mm2) 754
Calculated Spacing(mm) 149
Adopted Spacing(mm) 125
Percentage of steel,% 0.259
Distribution Reinforcement
Diameter of bar (mm) 12
Area(mm2) 600
Calculated Spacing(mm) 188
Adopted Spacing(mm) 125
Footing B
Depth consider for two way shear (mm) 414.615
Perimeter of punching area(mm) 3620.000
Two way shear (KN) 556.426
Nomiansl shear stress(τv) 0.371
Development Length
Footing A
Development Length(mm) 680
Side cover (mm) 50
Actual Length available(mm) 1425
Safe in Development Length
Footing B
Development Length(mm) 680
Side cover (mm) 50
Actual Length available(mm) 762.500
Safe in Development Length
For Footing B
Actual bearing stress(N/mm2) 6.060
Permissible bearing stress(N/mm2) 1.160
Dowels bar should be provided
Load Pu 544 KN
Design Load P 399 KN
L 1.68 meters
Footing Size Provided
B 1.68 meters
Area Provided A prvd 2.82 meters
Zx 0.79
Zx 0.79
Footing Size OK
2 Slab Design
lx 0.663
ly 0.663
Vu1 97 KN
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 172 KN
Vu1 97 KN
ζv 0.147 MPa
ζc 0.260 MPa
Vc1 172 KN
355
355
B= 1.68 meters
450 mm
200 mm
Calculations
Assume the thickness of slab as 127 mm ; Effective depth, d = 103 mm
Effective span, lx = 3.44 m (or) 3.313 m whichever is less; lx = 3.313 m
ly = 5.07 m (or) 4.943 m whichever is less; ly = 4.943 m
(ly / lx ) = 1.49 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
Load Calculations
2
Dead Load of slab = 0.127 x 25 = 3.18 KN/m
2
Finishes load on slab = 1.50 KN/m
2
Live Load on slab = 3.0 KN/m
2
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.68 KN/m
2
Total live load acting on the Structure = 3.0 KN/m
2
Factored Design Load w = 11.51 KN/m
Moment Calculation
2 2
Max. BM per unit width, Mx = ax w l x & My = ay w l x
2 2
Mu Mu / bd pt Ast, req Ast , min = (0.12/100) bD = 152 mm
KNm N/mm 2 % mm2
For Short Span,
Reinforcement details
At mid span, 7.04 - 0.16 163.635
At supports, 9.42 - 0.22 222.247 Provide Y8 @ 125 mm c/c at midspan &
For Long span, supports for short span (Ast pro. = 402 mm 2 )
At mid span, 4.42 - 0.1 101.139 Provide Y8 @ 125 mm c/c at midspan &
At supports, 5.94 - 0.13 137.149 supports for long span (Ast pro. = 402 mm 2 )
Ground Floor/1st
Column Type SIZE Location Nos Roof STIRRUPS
Floor/2nd Floor
Reinforcement in Concrete
Footing Footing depth
NOS Size x -direction & y- Footing edge depth
from Ground
Type direction depth
level Location
12mm Ø @ 6"
F1(Strap Beam-2'x1'6") 2 6'6"x6'6"
spacing on both side
18" 6" 5'-0" A2,B2
12mm Ø @ 6"
F2(Strap Beam-2'x1'6") 4 5'6"x5'6"
spacing on both side
12mm Ø @ 6"
F3(Pad Foundation) 4 5'x5'
spacing on both side
18" 6" 5'-0" Grd-D, C4
8mm - 125
C/B ratio
Ratio of flexural capacity of Beam/column is computed to preclude the formation of plastic hinges in
columns for obvious reasons.
Sum of flexural capacities of column at a joint should be 1.2 times the capacities of beam framing
into the joint in particular direction.
When capacity is exceeded, we can increase the size of column, or reduce the size of beam, or play
with reinforcement of members. It has nothing to do with redistribution of moments; If both end of
column will yield, during a seismic event, in a particular story, structure will most probably
collapse. In a frame, that is resisting lateral loads, you cannot take away the ability of beam to
develop negative moment; if you do not provide top reinforcement, it will not be called a moment
resisting frame, and will not resist lateral loads.
NBC Compliance Check list on Structural Analysis & Design for RCC
Uni Adopted
S.No Description Quantity Remarks
t Code
A General Information:
A.1 Owner’s Name: Bhupendra Bdr Singh
Address: Dhangadhi SubMetro Politian City-08
C Geological Investigation:
Geological Investigation
i) Yes No
Conducted
If No
Adopted Value as per NBC 205
C.9 Table
3.1
Structural Analysis
D.1 SAP2000 v22
Software:(version)
D.2 Structural System: SMRF
ISOLATED(Sloped
D.3 Foundation System:
)
D.4 Loading Parameters:
i. Dead Load: ……………. (As per NBC102:1994)
ii. Live Load: ……………. (As per NBC 103:1994)
…………….
iii. Other Load if any
D.5 Concrete Grade Used : M20 Column
Foundation, Beam,
M20
Slab
IS 1893:2016) :-
D.8.1 Zone Factor (Z): 0.36
D.8.2 Importance Factor(I): 1 Industrial
D.8.3 Soil Type: Medium Soil
Fundamental Time
D.8.4 0.394 sec
Period(Tx/y):
D.8.5 Response Reduction Factor (R):
D.8.9 Base Shear from Dynamic Analysis (Response spectrum analysis or time history)
Rx=
Ry=
D.8.1
Damping:
0
Seimic Coeffecient
D.9.1 Seismic Anlysis method
Method
wall etc: