Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TH TH
TH TH
INDIAN MATHEMATICS
INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION (3,500 BCE)
- have clear evidence of the usage of mathematics
1. CLASSICAL PERIOD
– Indian statistician
CONTRIBUTIONS:
CONTRIBUTIONS:
2. A beautiful comparison between Baudhayana Sulba Sutra (800 BCE) and Euclid’s Elements
(300 BCE). She took the example of the construction of a square. In BSS, it is the the first
construction that is shown. In the Elements, it is the 46th proposition that is shown probably
because certain other things needs to be proved before using those as knowledge and proving
the process of construction of a square. BSS was focused in giving geometric construction
methods for constructing fire altars. The objective was construction of fire altars and not arguing
with reason (we do see that the author knows the reason for certain theorems like Pythagoras
Theorem by some implicit remarks). Another difference is the style of writing the texts. In India,
at that time, the literature was Sutra literature which involved using of least number of letters and
writing in cryptic ways. In Greece it was prose, so there were lesser constraints. Also, the style
of proving wasn’t an axiomatic approach like the Greeks’ which was a cultural difference. For
instance, to draw arcs and straight lines, in India they used a rope. In Greece, they used a
compass and a straight edge. Indians didn’t talk about angles in earlier treatises on
trigonometry. In India, the length of the chord was the function of the arcs and the ratio of the
arc lengths to the circumference was the kind of notion for measurement, which today, we know
is nothing but the angle measurement. In Greece, the notion of angle and trigonometry was
different. Yet, both civilisations pursued the same topics in different ways. The notion of proofs
were different. The purpose of doing Mathematics was different, and much more to think about.