16-羟基封端的环氧树脂-Cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy resin toughened by hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 31

Accepted Manuscript

Cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy resin toughened by hydroxyl-terminated


polyurethane

Tong Wu, Yu Liu, Na Li, Gui-Wen Huang, Cheng-Bing Qu, Hong-Mei Xiao

PII: S0142-9418(18)31224-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.11.048
Reference: POTE 5724

To appear in: Polymer Testing

Received Date: 4 August 2018


Revised Date: 30 November 2018
Accepted Date: 30 November 2018

Please cite this article as: T. Wu, Y. Liu, N. Li, G.-W. Huang, C.-B. Qu, H.-M. Xiao, Cryogenic
mechanical properties of epoxy resin toughened by hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane, Polymer Testing
(2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.11.048.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy resin toughened by

hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane

Tong Wua,b, Yu Liua, Na Lia, Gui-Wen Huanga, Cheng-Bing Qua,*, Hong-Mei Xiaoa,**

a
Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing

PT
100190, China

RI
b
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

SC
* Corresponding author.

** Corresponding author.

U
AN
Tel./fax: +86 10 82543755. E-mail address: quchengbing@mail.ipc.ac.cn

(Cheng-Bing Qu), hmxiao@mail.ipc.ac.cn (Hong-Mei Xiao).


M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

In this work, we evaluated the room temperature (RT) and cryogenic temperature

(77K) mechanical properties of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA)/ diethyl

PT
toluene diamine (DETDA) system modified by two kinds of hydroxyl-terminated

polyurethanes (HTPU1 and HTPU2) with different molecular weights, in expectation

RI
of investigating the influence of phase structure on the overall resin performances.

SC
The morphological changes with different contents of HTPU were examined by

scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and two phase structures of homogeneous phase

U
AN
and sea-island structure were proved to be successfully obtained by introducing of

HTPU1 and HTPU2, respectively, which can be explained by the Flory-Huggins


M

solution theory. The mechanical properties of the two kinds of modified resins were
D

adequately compared at both RT and 77K. In general, the homogeneous phase


TE

resulted in higher enhancing effects on impact and tensile properties, while the

sea-island structure showed better retention in the glass transition temperature (Tg) of
EP

the mixture. The mechanism of these property differences depended on the phase
C

structure were discussed in detail and the conclusions achieved in this work could be
AC

reference valuable for the design and apply of modified resins with difference phase

structures at cryogenic temperature.

Keywords: Epoxy resin, Polyurethane, Toughness


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1. Introduction

Epoxy resin (EP) is widely used as adhesive, coating and matrix of composites in

cryogenic engineering areas due to their wide curing temperature range, low

PT
coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), high insulation resistance and good resistance

to chemical corrosion [1-4]. However, a higher cross-link density of the epoxy resins

RI
would lead to low absolute strength and poor fracture toughness, limiting its

SC
applications in mechanical components for cryogenic engineering applications [5-7].

Therefore, it is of great importance to toughen and modify epoxy resin at cryogenic

U
AN
temperature [8, 9]. It is considered as an extensive and efficient method to toughen

epoxy resin by incorporating heterogeneous phase with some additive such as rigid
M

inorganic particles [10-19], liquid rubber elastomer [20-23], some block copolymers
D

[24] and hyperbranched polymers [25]. Especially, polyurethane (PU) modified epoxy
TE

resin has attracted wide attention due to excellent toughness improvement coming

from existence of flexible carbamate group (- NHCOO -) on the PU molecule [26].


EP

Wang et al. have synthesized three different functional-terminated polyurethanes


C

(hydroxyl, amine and anhydride) to toughen DGEBA/4,4-Diaminodiphenylsulfone


AC

(DDS) system [27, 28]. Results show that comparing to the amine-terminated

polyurethane and anhydride-terminated polyurethane , only hydroxyl-terminated

polyurethane (HTPU) can form a more uniform distribution of particle diameter with

EP and result in a highest efficiency in toughness. Further reports show the epoxy

resin can form homogeneous phase or heterogeneous phase with the different
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

molecular weights and the different contents of PU [29, 30]. And in the heterogeneous

phase, epoxy resin composited with lower content of PU can form a sea-island

structure, and also can form a co-continuous phase by increasing the content of PU to

produce interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) [31-33]. Zielinski et al. [34] have

PT
reported that the size and distribution of second phase rubberlike particles of PU have

RI
a significant influence in the improvement of mechanical properties of epoxy resin.

However, few works in regard to the cryogenic mechanical properties of epoxy resin

SC
toughed by different molecular weight and contents of HTPU have been reported.

U
In this study, we used two kinds of HTPU as modifiers namely HTPU1 and
AN
HTPU2 to toughen DGEBA/DETDA system. HTPU1 and HTPU2 have different

molecular weights through adjusting the proportion of polyester and polyether in the
M

polyurethane. The impact and tensile properties were examined at RT and 77K for
D

HTPU modified epoxy resins. Moreover, dynamic thermal mechanical analysis was
TE

employed to investigate the thermal properties of epoxy resins with various contents

of HTPU. Finally, the toughing mechanism of these property differences depended on


EP

the phase structure was discussed.


C
AC

2. Experimental section

2.1 Materials

The epoxy resin used in this work was DGEBA (WSR615, from BLUESTAR

Nantong Star Synthetic Materials Co., Ltd. Nantong, China). The curing agent was

DETDA (from Albemarle Corporation Charlotte, USA). The HTPU1 and HTPU2 was
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

synthesized by Institute of Polymer Science & Engineering, Tsinghua University

(Beijing, China). All components were commercial products, and they were used as

received, without previous purification. Fig.1(a) and Fig.1(b) show the molecular

structures of DGEBA and DETDA,respectively. Fig. 1(c) shows the molecular

PT
structures of HTPU, in which A denotes epoxy group, carboxyl group or hydroxyl

group and the M1, M2 and M3 mean polyester, polyurethane and polyether, receptively.

RI
U SC
AN
Fig. 1. Structural formula of (a) DGEBA, (b) DETDA and (c) HTPU
M

2.2 Specimen preparation


D

The formulations of epoxy composites are listed in Table 1. Initially, HTPU1 or


TE

HTPU2 with different amount (weight ratios to DGEBA 5 phr, 10 phr, 20 phr) was

poured into the DGEBA. Then curing agent (DETDA) was added into the
EP

DGEBA/HTPU mixture with the weight ratio to DGEBA 25:100 to get mixed
C

solutions which were named EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 as shown in Table 1,


AC

receptively. In addition, the control group only contained DGEBA and DETDA with

the weight ratio 100:25. The mixture was then treated under magnetic stirring for 30

minutes to get homogeneous solution. Then the clear homogeneous solution was

degassed by a vacuum rotary pump at 60 °C for 30 minutes, because the air bubbles

which dissolved in mixture could affect the properties of the specimen by creaking
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

voids in the epoxy mixture. After the air bubbles were completely removed, mixture

was poured into a preheated stainless steel mold which was coated with Frekote ®

770-NC release agent in advance. Then the mold with mixture were placed in a hot air

oven at 80 °C for 8 hours following with 130 °C for 12 hours to obtain test specimens.

PT
Table 1
Formulations of EP/HTPU composites
HTPU content (phr) DGEBA (g) DETDA (g) HTPU1 (g) HTPU2 (g)

RI
Control group 0 100 25 0 0

EP/HTPU1-05 5 100 25 5 0

SC
EP/HTPU1-10 10 100 25 10 0

EP/HTPU1-20 20 100 25 20 0

EP/HTPU2-05 5 100 25 0 5

U
EP/HTPU2-10 10 100 25 0 10
AN
EP/HTPU2-20 20 100 25 0 20
M

2.3 Characterization
D

The fracture surfaces of the specimens after tensile test at RT or 77K were
TE

sputter coated with gold and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM,
EP

S-4800, HITACHI, Japan) under low vacuum mode (operating voltage 10 kV).

In order to investigate the influence of toughening agent on the alpha and beta
C

secondary relaxations of the epoxy resin system, dynamic thermal mechanical


AC

analysis (DMA, Q800, TA Instruments, USA) was used to characterize the

thermomechanical properties and glass transition temperature (Tg) of all specimens.

The temperature at which the beta secondary relaxation of epoxy resin occurs is about

– 50 °C according to the reference [28]. So the DMA tests were implemented using in

temperature range from -100 °C to 200 °C with frequency of 1 Hz and heating rate of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

5 °C/min under single cantilever bending mode. The samples were cut into dimension

of 30 mm×10 mm×2 mm.

Fourier Transform infrared spectra (FTIR) was conducted using Excalibur 3100

(Varian, America) to characterize the effect of functional groups of the additive on the

PT
epoxy during curing process. The spectrometer was equipped with an attenuated total

RI
reflectance (ATR) sampling accessory for the test of solid specimens. After solid

specimens were cleaned by ethyl alcohol, the spectra of solid specimens were

SC
determined by FTIR-ATR. The test wavenumber of solid specimens ranged from 600

U
cm-1 to 4000 cm-1. And the liquid mixture was dropped on the potassium bromide
AN
(KBr) tablets by plastic straw for the test. The test wavenumber of the liquid mixture

ranged from 400 cm-1 to 4000 cm-1. Each specimen was scanning 64 times to weaken
M

the influence of the noise.


D

Fourier Transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTMS) of the


TE

HTPU1 and HTPU2 were conducted using Q-Exactive (Thermo Fisher Scientific,

Germany) equipped with an electrospray ionization operating in the positive ion


EP

modes (pESI). The HTPU1 and HTPU2 were dissolved in methanol for testing.
C

FTMS-pESI was used to detect the difference in absolute molecular weight


AC

distribution of these two types of HTPU which contains same molecular structures.

2.4 Tests

The impact properties of specimens were determined by Impact testing machine

(RG-30, China) testing rectangular specimens of 80 mm × 10 mm × 4 mm according


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

to ASTM D256-10. In the 77K test, specimens were immersed in the liquid nitrogen

for 20 minutes. Then the specimen was one by one quickly taken out to the

experimental machine and finished test in 5 seconds. Consideration for data accuracy,

the test result was the average of at least 10 test specimens under 77K and RT tests,

PT
respectively.

RI
The tensile properties of specimens were determined by universal material testing

machine (Instron 5882, USA) testing dog bone shaped specimens according to ASTM

SC
D638-14. The specimen was tested at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. For the test at

U
77K, in order to ensure the temperature uniformity of the sample, the tensile
AN
specimens were first immersed in liquid nitrogen for 20 minutes, and the entire tensile

test was completed in a liquid nitrogen container. The test result was the average of at
M

least 4 test specimens under 77K and RT tests, respectively.


D
TE

3. Results and discussions


EP

3.1 Phase separation analyses

Fig. 2 shows that EP/HTPU2 exhibits phase separation morphology features


C
AC

which is distinguished from EP/HTPU1. It can be explained by Flory–Huggins

solution theory that in our epoxy resin system phase separation is primarily caused by

the difference of molecular weight of additive [35]. The result is an equation for the

Gibbs free energy change for mixing a polymer A with a solvent B. The Gibbs mixed

free energy can be calculated from Equation 1:


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

∆ =∆ − ∆ = + 1− + 1− (1)

where k is Boltzmann's constant. φ is lattice volume fractions of polymer A. NA and

NB are the number of polymer molecules of A and B

Where the interaction parameters χ can be obtained from Equation 2:

PT
%&
χ= 2"#$ − "## − "$$ = (# − ($ (2)
'

RI
where z is the coordination number. V0 is the volume of the polymer unit. The uAB, uAA

and uBB are the energy of the molecular interactions in the A-B, A-A and B-B,

SC
respectively.

U
AN
M
D
TE
EP

Fig. 2. The schematic diagram of epoxy resin mixing with HTPU and the SEM images of cured
mixture. Insets show the digital photographs of materials.
C

Gibbs mixed free energy consists of two parts, the entrogy and the energy. For
AC

the entrogy part, it always promotes the hybrid. Due to molecular weight of HTPU2 is

higher than HTPU1, the interaction parameters χ of EP/HTPU2 is higher than

EP/HTPU1 [36-38]. Thus, the Gibbs mixed free energy of EP/HTPU2 becomes

positive in contrast to that of EP/HTPU1 which remains negative. Therefore, during

the curing process, the mixture of EP/HTPU2 is unstable and phase separation takes
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

place as a result of nucleation and growth process.

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP

Fig. 3. FTIR spectra obtained from (a) liquid mixture (before curing) of EP/HTPU1, (b) liquid mixture
(before curing) of EP/HTPU2, (c) solid specimen (after curing) of EP/HTPU1, (d) solid specimen (after
AC

curing) of EP/HTPU2, (e) HTPU1 and (f) HTPU2

Furthermore, in order to prove that phase separation primarily influenced by the

molecular weight of additive, FTIR and FTMS-pESI analyses were performed. As

shown in Fig. 3(a), due to the presence of the DETDA and DGEBA, the double peak

of amino group at 3389 and 3462 cm-1 (-NH2 asymmetric stretching vibration) and the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

peak of epoxy group at 912 cm-1 (C-O stretching vibration) are observed in the liquid

mixture [39]. During curing process, only these two peaks are absent from the

spectrum of the specimen in the Fig. 3(c), because amino groups react with epoxy

groups. Besides, Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 3(d) show the similar phenomenon for EP/HTPU2.

PT
Comparing to the spectra of EP/HTPU1, there are no any other changes in the spectra

RI
of EP/HTPU2. As mentioned above, it is proved that the HTPU do not participate in

the curing reaction and the phase separation of EP/HTPU2 is not caused by the curing

SC
reaction of EP. Furthermore, Fig. 3(e) and Fig. 3(f) show that the HTPU1 and HTPU2

U
exist the same peaks. The peaks of the 3466 (3449) cm-1 (O-H stretching vibration)
AN
and the peaks of 1107 (1110) cm-1 (C-O stretching vibration) indicate that there

existed hydroxyl groups in the molecular structure of the HTPU [40]. The epoxy
M

group and carboxyl group of the molecular structure are absent in FTIR spectra,
D

which results from much less amount these two groups than hydroxyl group. Even if
TE

both HTPU1 and HTPU2 have hydroxyl groups, since HTPU2 precipitates after

curing, only HTPU1 can form a stable hydrogen bond with EP and dissolves in it.
EP

Thus, FTIR indicates that functional groups are not the factor of the phase separation
C

in the EP/HTPU2. Consequently, FTMS-pESI was performed to detect difference of


AC

the molecular weight in the HTPU1 and HTPU2.

Fig. 4 shows the characteristic spectra of the HTPU1 and HTPU2 analyzed via

FTMS-pESI. The base peaks of the HTPU1 and HTPU2 are 447.2918 m/z and

1375.4525 m/z, respectively. It is worth noting that the base peak of the HTPU2 is

exactly three times that of the HTPU1. Besides, the peaks of 924.6312 m/z and
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

447.2913 m/z observed in the spectrum of HTPU2 are double and equal of the base

peak (447.2918 m/z) of HTPU1. Combining with FTIR spectra, it indicates that the

HTPU1 and HTPU2 have the same basic molecular structures but are different in

molecular weight [41].

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

Fig. 4. FTMS-pESI for a methanolic solution of HTPU with range of the 150-2000 m/z (a) HTPU1 and
(b) HTPU2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE

Fig. 5. DMA tests of the EP composited with different contents of HTPU: (a) storage modulus of
EP

EP/HTPU1, (b) storage modulus of EP/HTPU2, (c) tanδ of EP/HTPU1, (d) tanδ of EP/HTPU2, (e) Tg
of EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 and (f) full width at half maxima (FWHM) of EP/HTPU1-α and
EP/HTPU2-α in tanδ
C

3.2 DMA analyses and discussions


AC

DMA tests have been performed to investigate whether the presence of the

HTPU affects the crosslink density and the Tg of epoxy resin. Continuous temperature

sweep tests have been performed in a wide range of temperature from -100 °C to

200 °C to characterize the viscoelasticity of the materials. Fig. 5 shows the curves of
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

storage modulus and tanδ in DMA tests. As shown in Fig. 5(a), there exists an unusual

phenomenon that in the range from -20 °C to 20 °C, the storage modulus of the

control group is the lowest compared to any other EP/HTPU1 with different contents

of HTPU1. This may be due to the strong hydrogen bonds interaction between

PT
hydroxyl groups of HTPU1 and EP [26,42]. However, Fig. 5(b) shows that the storage

RI
modulus of EP/HTPU2 with all different contents are lower than the control group in

a wider temperature range from -100 °C to 160 °C. This may be due to the rubber

SC
aggregate phase formed by the precipitation of HTPU2 after curing process. [43]. Fig.

U
5(c) and Fig. 5(d) give the tanδ of EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2, respectively. The tanδ
AN
of EP/HTPU1 in Fig. 5(c) shows the α-relaxation peak and β-relaxation peak shift to

lower temperature with the increase of HTPU1 contents. However, the α-relaxation
M

peak and β-relaxation peak of EP/HTPU2 in Fig. 5(d) change very little with the
D

increase of HTPU2 contents. The α-relaxation temperature (Tg,α) and β-relaxation


TE

temperature (Tg,β) of EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 with different HTPU contents are

given in Fig. 5(e). The results show when the HTPU1 content increased from 0 to 20
EP

phr, the Tg,α and Tg,β of EP/HTPU1 decreased from 158.6 °C and -51.1 °C to
C

101.4 °C and -61.5 °C, respectively. But under the same conditions, Tg,α and Tg,β of
AC

EP/HTPU2 only decreased from 158.6 °C and -51.1 °C to 155.9 °C and -52.1 °C,

respectively. Because of the dissolution of the HTPU1 in the epoxy systems, the

presence of the flexible chains causes the decrease of the entire cross-linked network

density between DGEBA and DETDA, and the motion of the network can become

more easily under external forces, finally showing the decrease in Tg [27,44]. But
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

because most HTPU2 will precipitate after curing process, the Tg of EP/HTPU2

change little. Fig. 5(f) shows the full width at half maxima (FWHM) of EP/HTPU1-α

and EP/HTPU2-α measured in the peaks of tanδ, which indicates as increasing the

contents of HTPU1, the FWHM of EP/HTPU1 increases. On the contrary, the FWHM

PT
of EP/HTPU2 is far different from EP/HTPU1. The differences of the FWHM

RI
between EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 prove that higher miscibility and interaction exist

between EP and HTPU1 [26].

SC
3.3 Mechanical properties results and analyses

U
The overall mechanical performance of epoxy resin is much possibly influenced
AN
by homogeneous phase and sea-island structure formed by EP/HTPU1 and
M

EP/HTPU2, respectively. Hence emphasis has been given to provide an insight on the
D

epoxy resin microstructure in the control group, EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 tested at
TE

RT and 77K. Fig. 6 shows three zones of tensile fracture morphologies of EP/HTPU1

and control group which represents three stages of tensile fracture. In the first mirror
EP

area named crack initiation shown in Fig. 6(S1), this area macroscopically presents a
C

flat smooth semicircular mirror that normally appears at the edges or corners of the
AC

specimen. The morphology is a smooth surface with no rough parts, lumps or holes.

And in the second misty area named crack propagation shown in Fig. 6(S2), river

patterns are observed at RT test. The river patterns are radioactively extended from

the initiation of the crack and presents approximately parallel, slightly curved, wavy

stripes. But the morphology of the tensile fracture at 77K is completely different with
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

which were tested at RT. As shown in Fig. 7(from a-S2 to d-S2) and Fig. 8(from a-S2

to d-S2), the crease of the fracture morphology at 77K is not observed compared with

RT. This area is flat but not reflective compared with the mirror area. And there are

some parabolic patterns in this area with the axis pointing to the crack initiation. The

PT
difference of the misty area between RT and 77K indicates that the molecular chains

RI
of the epoxy resin are frozen at cryogenic temperatures and results in matrix more

brittle. Finally, in the last area named instantaneous fracture shown in Fig. 6(S3),

SC
there is fill of dimples which are round or oval pit that is approximate in size. More

U
importantly, Fig. 7(from a-S3 to d-S3) and Fig. 8(from a-S3 to d-S3) show that the
AN
crease of the fracture morphology at 77K is not observed. As dimples become larger,

it can absorb more fracture energy to achieve toughening. However, these three areas
M

are partially covered up and interrupted by the presence of the second phase particles
D

of HTPU2. The similar phenomenon of these three stages is not observed in the
TE

tensile fracture morphology of EP/HTPU2 (Fig. 9).


C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
Fig. 6. The schematic diagram of the tensile fracture morphology divided into three areas: (S1) SEM of
AN
the first mirror area, (S2) SEM of the second misty area and (S3) SEM of the instantaneous fracture
area
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D

Fig. 7. SEM images of the tensile fracture morphologies under 77K tests with the addition of the
HTPU1: (a) 0 phr, (b) 5 phr, (c) 10 phr and (d) 20 phr
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D

Fig. 8. SEM images of the tensile fracture morphologies under RT tests with the addition of the HTPU1:
(a) 0 phr, (b) 5 phr, (c) 10 phr and (d) 20 phr
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

Fig. 9. SEM images of the tensile fracture morphologies of EP/HTPU2: (a) 0 phr, (b) 5 phr, (c) 10 phr
and (d) 20 phr at RT; (e) 0 phr, (f) 5 phr, (g) 10 phr, (h) 20 phr at 77K

Comparing Fig.9(a)-(d) with Fig. 9(e)-(h), the distribution and the sizes of these

particles are identical at 77K and RT. In the process of crack advancement, it is

sometimes necessary to bypass the particles of the second phase. Because these
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

second phase particles are more flexible than the matrix phase, particles deformation

is also observed. Shear bands formed by shear yield and multiple cracks can be seen

from where the edges are whitened [45]. This toughening mechanism is similar to

liquid rubber toughening epoxy resins such as CTBN [46]. Besides, as the content of

PT
the HTPU2 increases, the second phase precipitates more, the particles are larger, and

RI
the distribution is more density [47]. The size of the particles and the distribution can

appropriately affect the overall mechanical properties of EP [48].

U SC
AN
M
D

Fig. 10. Variation of impact strength of (a) EP/HTPU1 and (b) EP/HTPU2 at 77K and RT
TE

As shown in Fig. 10(a), the impact strength of EP/HTPU1 at the 10 phr of

HTPU1 content increases almost 77% higher than control group at RT. However, the
EP

impact strength of the EP/HTPU1 does not increase significantly until the HTPU1
C

content increases up to 20 phr at 77K. In general, the impact strength of the epoxy
AC

resin at 77K is lower than it at RT because of the freeze of the polymer chain.

Nevertheless, comparing with the impact strength of EP/HTPU1 at 20 phr HTPU1

content, the impact strength of EP/HTPU1 at 77K was slightly higher than at RT. This

may be due to the HTPU1 contains sufficient flexible groups to reduce the stiffness of

EP cross-linked network, further absorbing the fracture energy. And in Fig. 10(b), the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

trend of impact strength of the HTPU2 is similar with the HTPU1 at RT. The

EP/HTPU2 with the addition of 10 phr HTPU2 has the highest impact strength at RT

and 77K. In terms of the impact strength, HTPU1 and HTPU2 with the optimum

contents both benefit the toughness of epoxy resin at RT and 77K.

PT
Table 2
Tensile properties of unmodified and HTPU1-modified epoxy resins at RT and 77 K.
Tensile strength (MPa) Tensile modulus (GPa) Elongation at break (%)

RI
HTPU1 content (phr)
RT 77K RT 77K RT 77K

0 65.43 ± 5.23 111.71 ± 8.49 2.95 ± 0.17 6.90 ± 0.10 3.28 ± 0.42 1.62 ± 0.12

SC
5 71.59 ± 4.04 161.67 ± 5.09 3.05 ± 0.03 6.89 ± 0.19 3.33 ± 0.63 2.58 ± 0.17

10 81.97 ± 3.56 121.61 ± 8.50 3.07 ± 0.11 6.89 ± 0.60 3.40 ± 0.42 1.82 ± 0.17

20 50.70 ± 5.36 114.92 ± 4.27 2.49 ± 0.12 6.94 ± 0.64 5.32 ± 0.53 1.72 ± 0.49

U
Table 3
AN
Tensile properties of unmodified and HTPU2-modified epoxy resins at RT and 77 K.
Tensile strength (MPa) Tensile modulus (GPa) Elongation at break (%)
HTPU2 content (phr)
RT 77K RT 77K RT 77K
M

0 65.43 ± 5.23 111.71 ± 8.49 2.95 ± 0.17 6.90 ± 0.10 3.28 ± 0.42 1.62 ± 0.12

5 65.02 ± 5.33 92.33 ± 6.41 2.59 ± 0.10 6.52 ± 0.22 4.39 ± 1.01 1.43 ± 0.25
D

10 60.97 ± 4.58 98.21 ± 11.73 2.58 ± 0.06 6.61 ± 0.23 4.12 ± 0.77 1.56 ± 0.27

20 45.31 ± 7.25 65.30 ± 2.23 2.11 ± 0.12 6.60 ± 0.08 3.22 ± 1.11 0.98 ± 0.07
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

PT
RI
U SC
AN
Fig. 11. Typical stress–strain cures of EP/HTPU1 at (a) RT and (b) 77 K and EP/HTPU2 at (c) RT and
(d) 77K.
M

A clear picture of tensile properties of epoxy modified by a series content of


D

HTPU at RT and 77K has been shown in Fig. 11. Table 2 and Table 3 list the specific
TE

values of tensile properties of EP/HTPU1 and EP/HTPU2 at 77K and RT. With the

increase of the second phase rubberlike particles of HTPU2, the tensile modulus of
EP

EP/HTPU2 decreases continuously. On the contrary, since the terminal hydroxyl


C

groups of HTPU1 can form hydrogen bonds with epoxy and curing agent, the tensile
AC

modulus starts to gradually increase until the HTPU1 content is up to 20 phr. When

the HTPU1 content is 20 phr, the flexible chains in the system is sufficiently large, the

flexible chains provided by HTPU1 start to play a primary role rather than hydrogen

bonds result in tensile modulus decreasing. However, at 77K, variation trend of tensile

modulus is different to the RT. When the temperature decreases from RT to 77K, the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

molecule and the chemical bonds will shrink and freeze and the chemical bonds

between molecule will be stronger. Because of it, the tensile modulus of EP/HTPU1 is

unchanged and independent of the HTPU1 content and the tensile modulus of

EP/HTPU2 is only slightly reduced at 77K. Besides, comparing with same contents of

PT
HTPU1 and HTPU2 at 77K and RT, because of the enhancement of the chemical bond

RI
energy, the tensile modulus of EP/HTPU at 77K is twice than it at RT and the value of

tensile strength of EP/HTPU at 77K is much higher than it at RT. In addition, since

SC
the cross-linked network is frozen and difficult to stretch at 77 K, there is no yielding

U
phenomenon of the epoxy resin. So the optimum tensile strength and elongation at
AN
break of EP/HTPU1 have the same appropriate content of HTPU1 at 77K. As shown

in Table 2, the tensile strength and elongation at break of EP/HTPU1 at 5 phr HTPU1
M

content increase 45% and 59% at 77K. However, the tensile strength and elongation at
D

break of EP/HTPU2 both show lower than the control group at 77K. It may due to the
TE

second phase rubberlike particle size is too large to benefit the toughness of EP at 77K

which is same like Chen et al. [49]. Besides, the tensile strength of EP/HTPU2
EP

continuously decreases with the increases of the HTPU2 content at RT. Fig. 9 shows
C

that the particle size and distribution are positively related to the HTPU2 contents.
AC

When the HTPU2 content is higher than 5 phr, the particle size is too large and

becomes the point defect, leading to the decrease of the elongation at break of

EP/HTPU2 at RT. When the content of HTPU2 is 5 phr, the elongation at break of

EP/HTPU2 is increased 34% at RT. Unlike EP/HTPU2, due to the competitive

relation between rigidity of hydrogen bonds and mollification of rigid cross-linked


ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

network, the tensile strength of EP/HTPU1 increases initially and then decreases at RT.

When the content of HTPU1 is lower, HTPU1 is dispersed in the epoxy matrix and

forms hydrogen bonds with epoxy and curing agent, leading the increases of the

tensile strength of EP/HTPU1. When the HTPU1 content increases, more flexible

PT
chains of HTPU1 dissolve in epoxy matrix, reducing the rigidity of the entire network

RI
and the tensile strength of EP/HTPU1. Although the elongation at break of

EP/HTPU1 at 20 phr HTPU1 content is up to 5.32%, it is 62% higher than control

SC
group at RT. Due to its Tg, tensile strength, and tensile modulus decreased

U
significantly compared with the control group, it is not suitable for practical
AN
applications. Therefore, the optimum content of HTPU1 for EP/HTPU1 system is 10

phr, where the tensile strength and the elongation at break of EP/HTPU1 increase
M

respectively 8% and 40% at RT.


D
TE

4. Conclusions
EP

In this study, two kinds of HTPU (HTPU1 and HTPU2) with same molecular

structure and different molecular weights were used to toughen DGEBA/DETDA


C

epoxy system, which forms homogeneous phase and sea-island structure in the
AC

obtained composite, respectively. The formation principle of the different structure

could be explained by Flory–Huggins solution theory. Mechanical properties of these

two kinds of modified epoxy resins at RT and 77K were tested and compared. The

results of impact and tensile tests show that the introduction of HTPU1 with

appropriate contents into the epoxy matrix could effectively enhance the mechanical
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

properties at both 77K and RT. This is because the formation of homogeneous phase

structure with HTPU1 could help the epoxy resin enlarge the dimples during the

fracture and further absorb more fracture energy. However, the tensile properties of

EP/HTPU2 at 77K and RT decrease with the increase of HTPU2 contents, which

PT
results from the large size of second phase rubberlike particle size. On the other hand,

RI
DMA results indicate that the Tg of the homogeneous phased composite significantly

reduces with the increase of the HTPU1 content. However, because of the phase

SC
separation, the Tg of EP/HTPU2 composite could be well maintained. The conclusions

U
achieved in this work could be reference valuable for the design and apply of
AN
modified resins with difference phase structures at cryogenic temperature.
M

Acknowledgements
D

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
TE

(11572321 and 51503213).


EP

References
C

[1] F.L. Jin, X. Li, S.J. Park, Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: A review, J.
AC

Ind. Eng. Chem. 29 (2015) 1-11.


[2] Y. Shao, F. Xu, W. Liu, M. Zhou, W. Li, D. Hui, Y. Qiu, Influence of cryogenic
treatment on mechanical and interfacial properties of carbon nanotube
fiber/bisphenol-F epoxy composite, Compos. B Eng. 125 (2017) 195-202.
[3] J.P. Yang, Z.K. Chen, Q.P. Feng, Y.H. Deng, Y. Liu, Q.Q. Ni, S.Y. Fu, Cryogenic
mechanical behaviors of carbon nanotube reinforced composites based on modified
epoxy by poly(ethersulfone), Compos. B Eng. 43(1) (2012) 22-26.
[4] Z.X. Wu, R.J. Huang, X.X. Chu, C.J. Huang, J.J. Zhang, L.F. Li, Cryogenic
properties of hollow glass microsphere/epoxy composites, Advances in Cryogenic
Engineering AIP Conf. Proc. 1435(2012) 156-163
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[5] F. Awaja, S. Zhang, M. Tripathi, A. Nikiforov, N. Pugno, Cracks, microcracks and
fracture in polymer structures: Formation, detection, autonomic repair, Prog. Mater.
Sci. 83 (2016) 536-573.
[6] M. Naebe, M.M. Abolhasani, H. Khayyam, A. Amini, B. Fox, Crack Damage in
Polymers and Composites: A Review, Polym. Rev. 56(1) (2016) 31-69.
[7] I. Zaman, T.T. Phan, H.C. Kuan, Q. Meng, L.T. Bao La, L. Luong, O. Youssf, J.
Ma, Epoxy/graphene platelets nanocomposites with two levels of interface strength,
Polymer 52(7) (2011) 1603-1611.

PT
[8] G. Mashouf Roudsari, A.K. Mohanty, M. Misra, Green Approaches To Engineer
Tough Biobased Epoxies: A Review, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5(11) (2017)
9528-9541.

RI
[9] S.C. Ligon Auer, M. Schwentenwein, C. Gorsche, J. Stampfl, R. Liska,
Toughening of photo-curable polymer networks: a review, Polym. Chem. 7(2) (2016)
257-286.

SC
[10] S. Liu, V.S. Chevali, Z. Xu, D. Hui, H. Wang, A review of extending performance
of epoxy resins using carbon nanomaterials, Compos. B Eng. 136 (2018) 197-214.
[11] I. Rafique, A. Kausar, Z. Anwar, B. Muhammad, Exploration of Epoxy Resins,

U
Hardening Systems, and Epoxy/Carbon Nanotube Composite Designed for High
AN
Performance Materials: A Review, Polym.-Plast. Technol. Eng. 55(3) (2015) 312-333.
[12] K. Shirvanimoghaddam, S.U. Hamim, M. Karbalaei Akbari, S.M. Fakhrhoseini,
H. Khayyam, A.H. Pakseresht, E. Ghasali, M. Zabet, K.S. Munir, S. Jia, J.P. Davim,
M. Naebe, Carbon fiber reinforced metal matrix composites: Fabrication processes
M

and properties, Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 92 (2017) 70-96.


[13] O. Zabihi, M. Ahmadi, S. Nikafshar, K. Chandrakumar Preyeswary, M. Naebe, A
D

technical review on epoxy-clay nanocomposites: Structure, properties, and their


applications in fiber reinforced composites, Compos. B Eng. 135 (2018) 1-24.
TE

[14] H.A. Al Turaif, Effect of nano TiO2 particle size on mechanical properties of
cured epoxy resin, Prog. Org. Coat. 69(3) (2010) 241-246.
[15] X. Zhang, W. Xu, X. Xia, Z. Zhang, R. Yu, Toughening of cycloaliphatic epoxy
EP

resin by nanosize silicon dioxide, Mater. Lett. 60(28) (2006) 3319-3323.


[16] H. Zhang, L.C. Tang, Z. Zhang, K. Friedrich, S. Sprenger, Fracture behaviours of
in situ silica nanoparticle-filled epoxy at different temperatures, Polymer 49(17)
C

(2008) 3816-3825.
[17] P. Vejayakumaran, I.A. Rahman, C.S. Sipaut, J. Ismail, C.K. Chee, Structural and
AC

thermal characterizations of silica nanoparticles grafted with pendant maleimide and


epoxide groups, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 328(1) (2008) 81-91.
[18] D. Pinto, L. Bernardo, A. Amaro, S. Lopes, Mechanical properties of epoxy
nanocomposites using titanium dioxide as reinforcement – A review, Constr. Build.
Mater. 95 (2015) 506-524.
[19] C. Chen, R.S. Justice, D.W. Schaefer, J.W. Baur, Highly dispersed
nanosilica–epoxy resins with enhanced mechanical properties, Polymer 49(17) (2008)
3805-3815.
[20] H. Zhou, S. Xu, A new method to prepare rubber toughened epoxy with high
modulus and high impact strength, Mater. Lett. 121 (2014) 238-240.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[21] G. Tripathi, D. Srivastava, Studies on the physico-mechanical and thermal
characteristics of blends of DGEBA epoxy, 3,4 epoxy cyclohexylmethyl,
3’,4’-epoxycylohexane carboxylate and carboxyl terminated butadiene
co-acrylonitrile (CTBN), Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 496(1-2) (2008) 483-493.
[22] R. Bagheri, B.T. Marouf, R.A. Pearson, Rubber-Toughened Epoxies: A Critical
Review, Polym. Rev. 49(3) (2009) 201-225.
[23] M.R. Dadfar, F. Ghadami, Effect of rubber modification on fracture toughness
properties of glass reinforced hot cured epoxy composites, Mater. Des. 47 (2013)

PT
16-20.
[24] J. Wang, Z. Xue, Y. Li, G. Li, Y. Wang, W.H. Zhong, X. Yang, Synergistically
effects of copolymer and core-shell particles for toughening epoxy, Polymer 140

RI
(2018) 39-46.
[25] S. Chen, Z. Xu, D. Zhang, Synthesis and application of epoxy-ended
hyperbranched polymers, Chem. Eng. J. 343 (2018) 283-302.

SC
[26] A. Reghunadhan, J. Datta, N. Kalarikkal, S. Thomas, Development of nanoscale
morphology and role of viscoelastic phase separation on the properties of
epoxy/recycled polyurethane blends, Polymer 117 (2017) 96-106.

U
[27] H.H. Wang, J.C. Chen, Modification and Compatibility of Epoxy Resin With
AN
Hydroxyl-Terminated or Amine-Terminated Polyurethanes, Polym. Eng. Sci. 35(18)
(1995) 1468-1475.
[28] H.H. Wang, J.C. Chen, Toughening of epoxy resin by functional-terminated
polyurethanes and/or semicrystalline polymer powders, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 82(12)
M

(2001) 2903-2912.
[29] Y.C. Chern, K.H. Hsieh, J.S. Hsu, Interpenetrating polymer networks of
D

polyurethane cross-linked epoxy and polyurethanes, J. Mater. Sci. 32(13) (1997)


3503-3509.
TE

[30] D.S. Kim, K. Cho, J.H. An, C.E. Park, Toughening mechanisms of modified
unsaturated polyester with novel liquid polyurethane rubber, J. Mater. Sci. 29(7)
(1994) 1854-1866.
EP

[31] B. Tang, X. Liu, X. Zhao, J. Zhang, Highly efficientin situtoughening of epoxy


thermosets with reactive hyperbranched polyurethane, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131(16)
(2014) 1107-1117.
C

[32] J. Lin, X. Wu, C. Zheng, P. Zhang, Q. Li, W. Wang, Z. Yang, A novolac epoxy
resin modified polyurethane acylates polymer grafted network with enhanced thermal
AC

and mechanical properties, J. Polym. Res. 21(6) (2014).


[33] P.S. Sampath, V. Murugesan, M. Sarojadevi, G. Thanigaiyarasu, Mode I and
Mode II delamination resistance and mechanical properties of woven glass/epoxy-PU
IPN composites, Polym. Compos. 29(11) (2008) 1227-1234.
[34] J.M. Zielinski, M.S. Vratsanos, Phase-separation on studies of heat-cured
ATU-flexibilized epoxies, Polymer 37(1) (1996) 75-84.
[35] H.G. Schild, M. Muthukumar, D.A. Tirrell, Cononsolvency in Mixed Aqueous
Solutions of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide), Macromolecules 24(4) (1991) 948-952.
[36] W. Zhou, J. Wang, Z. Gong, J. Gong, N. Qi, B. Wang, Investigation of interfacial
interaction and structural transition for epoxy/nanotube composites by positron
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
annihilation lifetime spectroscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(2) (2009) 021904.
[37] A.J. Marzocca, A.L. Rodríguez Garraza, M.A. Mansilla, Evaluation of the
polymer–solvent interaction parameter χ for the system cured polybutadiene rubber
and toluene, Polym. Test 29(1) (2010) 119-126.
[38] R. Mezzenga, L. Boogh, J.A.E. Manson, Evaluation of Solubility Parameters
during Polymerisation of Amine-Cured Epoxy Resins, J. Polym. Sci. Pt. B-Polym.
Phys. 38(14) (2000). 1883-1892
[39] C. Ramírez, M. Rico, A. Torres, L. Barral, J. López, B. Montero, Epoxy/POSS

PT
organic–inorganic hybrids: ATR-FTIR and DSC studies, Eur. Polym. J. 44(10) (2008)
3035-3045.
[40] W.S. Ng, C.S. Lee, S.F. Cheng, C.H. Chuah, S.F. Wong, Biocompatible

RI
Polyurethane Scaffolds Prepared from Glycerol Monostearate-Derived Polyester
Polyol, J. Polym. Environ. 26(7) (2018) 2881-2900.
[41] M. Ionescu, S. Sinharoy, Z.S. Petrović, Polyacetal Polyols for Polyurethanes, J.

SC
Polym. Environ. 17(2) (2009) 123-130.
[42] X. He, X. Xu, Q. Wan, G. Bo, Y. Yan, Synthesis and Characterization of
Dimmer-Acid-Based Nonisocyanate Polyurethane and Epoxy Resin Composite,

U
Polymers 9(12) (2017) 649.
AN
[43] W.J. Chen, S.C. Wang, P.C. Chen, T.W. Chen, K.N. Chen, Hybridization of
aqueous PU/epoxy resin via a dual self-curing process, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 110(1)
(2008) 147-155.
[44] M.X. Shi, J.L. Zheng, Z.X. Huang, Y. Qin, Synthesis of Polyurethane
M

Prepolymers and Damping Property of Polyurethane/Epoxy Composites, Adv. Sci.


Lett. 4(3) (2011) 740-744.
D

[45] T. Sun, Z. Wu, Q. Zhuo, X. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Fan, Microstructure and mechanical
properties of aminated polystyrene spheres/epoxy polymer blends, Compos. A Appl.
TE

Sci. Manuf. 66 (2014) 58-64.


[46] S. Wu, Q. Guo, M. Kraska, B. Stühn, Y.W. Mai, Toughening Epoxy Thermosets
with Block Ionomers: The Role of Phase Domain Size, Macromolecules 46(20) (2013)
EP

8190-8202.
[47] D. Carolan, A. Ivankovic, A.J. Kinloch, S. Sprenger, A.C. Taylor, Toughening of
epoxy-based hybrid nanocomposites, Polymer 97 (2016) 179-190.
C

[48] P. Dittanet, R.A. Pearson, Effect of silica nanoparticle size on toughening


mechanisms of filled epoxy, Polymer 53(9) (2012) 1890-1905.
AC

[49] Z.K. Chen, G. Yang, J.P. Yang, S.Y. Fu, L. Ye, Y.G. Huang, Simultaneously
increasing cryogenic strength, ductility and impact resistance of epoxy resins
modified by n-butyl glycidyl ether, Polymer 50(5) (2009) 1316-1323.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights:
Homogeneous phase or sea-island structure of the modified epoxy resin can be
controllably obtained by regulating the molecular weight of the adding
hydroxyl-terminated polyurethane.
The modified epoxy resin with homogeneous phase exhibits greatly enhanced
cryogenic mechanical properties.
The glass transition temperature (Tg) of the modified epoxy resin with sea-island
structures can be well maintained.

PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC

You might also like