Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essentialism Module (Garcia, James Mark S.)
Essentialism Module (Garcia, James Mark S.)
Essentialism Module (Garcia, James Mark S.)
ESSENTIALISM
OVERVIEW
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
CONTENT
I. ESSENTIALISM
The Oxford English Dictionary defines essentialism as a belief that things have
a set of characteristics which make them what they are, and that the task of science and
philosophy is their discovery and expression; the doctrine that essence is prior to
existence.
In ontology, there is the view that some properties of objects are essential to
them. The “essence” of a thing is conceived as the totality of its essential properties.
Theories of essentialism differ with respect to their conception of what it means to say
that a property is essential to an object. The concept of an essential property is closely
related to the concept of necessity, since one way of saying that a property P is essential
to an object O is to say that the proposition “O has P” is necessarily true. A general but
not very informative way of characterizing essential properties is to say that property is
essential to an object if the object cannot lack the property and still be the object that it
is. Properties of an object that are not essential in this sense are said to be accidental.
II. EDUCATION
under the guidance of others. Education is commonly divided into stages such as
preschool, primary school, secondary school and then college, university, or
apprenticeship.
An Essentialist will usually teach some set subjects similar to Reading, Writing,
Literature, Foreign Languages, History, Mathematics, Science, Art, and Music. The
teacher's role is to instill respect for authority, perseverance, duty, consideration, and
practicality. Essentialism strives to teach students the accumulated knowledge of our
civilization through core courses in the traditional academic disciplines. Essentialists
aim to instill students with the "essentials" of academic knowledge, patriotism, and
character development. This traditional approach is meant to train the mind, promote
reasoning, and ensure a common culture.
The Essentialist movement first began in the United States in the year 1938. In
Atlantic City, New Jersey, a group met for the first time called "The Essentialist's
Committee for the Advancement of Education." Their emphasis was to reform the
educational system to a rational-based system.
The term essentialist first appeared in the book An Introduction to the
Philosophy of Education which was written by Michael John Demiashkevich. In his
book, Demiashkevich labels some specific educators (including William C. Bagley) as
“essentialists." Demiashkevich compared the essentialists to the different viewpoints of
the Progressive Education Association. He described how the Progressives preached a
“hedonistic doctrine of change” whereas the essentialists stressed the moral
responsibility of man for his actions and looked toward permanent principles of
behavior (Demiashkevich likened the arguments to those between the Socratics and the
Sophists in Greek philosophy). In 1938 Bagley and other educators met together where
Bagley gave a speech detailing the main points of the essentialism movement and
attacking the public education in the United States. One point that Bagley noted was
that students in the U.S. were not getting an education on the same levels as students in
Europe who were the same age.
A recent branch has emerged within the essentialist school of thought called
"neoessentialism." Emerging in the eighties as a response to the essentialist ideals of
the thirties as well as to the criticism of the fifties and the advocates for education in
the seventies, neoessentialism was created to try to appease the problems facing the
United States at the time. The most notable change within this school of thought is that
it called for the creation of a new discipline, computer science.
V. RENOWNED ESSENTIALISTS
Figure 1. William Chandler Bagley acquired his Ph.D. in 1900 after which
(1874-1946)
he took his first school job a principal
Source. (Wisconsin Historical Society)
in a St. Louis, Missouri Elementary School. Bagley’s devotion increased during his
work at Montana State Normal School in Dillon, Montana. It was here where he decided
to dedicate his time to the education of teachers and where he published The Educative
Process, launching his name across the nation. Throughout his career Bagley argued
against the conservative position that teachers were not in need of special training for
their work. He believed that liberal arts material was important in teacher education.
Bagley also believed the dominant theories of education of the time were weak and
lacking.
In April 1938, he published the Essentialist's Platform, in which he outlined
three major points of essentialism. He described the right of students to a well-educated
and culturally knowledgeable teacher. Secondly, he discussed the importance of
teaching the ideals of community to each group of students. Lastly, Bagley wrote of the
importance of accuracy, thoroughness and effort on part of the student in the classroom.
Armstrong (2012) cited other non-traditional areas that were also integrated as
well in moderation to balance the education. Essentialists' goals are to instill students
with the "essentials" of academic knowledge, patriotism, and character development
through traditional (or back-to-basic) approaches. This is to promote reasoning, train
the mind, and ensure a common culture for all Americans.
The role of the teacher, according to Howick (1971), as the leader of the
classroom is a very important tenet of educational essentialism. The teacher is the center
of the classroom, so they should be rigid and disciplinary. Establishing order in the
classroom is crucial for student learning; effective teaching cannot take place in a loud
and disorganized environment. It is the teacher's responsibility to keep order in the
classroom. The teacher must interpret essentials of the learning process, take the
leadership position and set the tone of the classroom. These needs require an educator
who is academically well-qualified with an appreciation for learning and development.
The teacher must control the students with distributions of rewards and penalties.
The core knowledge schools were founded on the philosophy of essentialist E.D.
Hirsch. Although it is difficult to maintain a pure and strict essentialist-only curriculum,
these schools have the central aim of establishing a common knowledge base for all
citizens. To do so, they follow a nation-wide, content-specific, and teacher-centered
curriculum. The Core Knowledge curriculum also allows for local variance above and
beyond the core curriculum. Central curricular aims are academic excellence and the
learning of knowledge, and teachers who are masters of their knowledge areas serve
this aim.
students based upon the core disciplines. Moreover, he or she is enacting the curriculum
and setting the standards to which the students must meet. The teacher's evaluation role
undermines students' interest in study. As a result, the students begin to take on more
of a passive role in their education as they are forced to meet and learn such standards
and information.
One of the greatest criticisms of Essentialism in Education is the fact that this
idea stresses solely on teaching the traditional basic subjects to the maximum level,
meaning there is less capacity to teach more contemporary and creative education and
"manufacturing" students that do not think by themselves.
CONCLUSION
Modern times have changed, changing the needs and the education requirements. Many
new progressive subjects have been introduced in the curriculum. On the other hand,
essentialist education aims to focus on the basic subjects only with an emphasis on
character building. The importance of focusing on personality development cannot be
denied in any age or time even if some may criticize is as a conservative approach. In
response to the original movement 1930's and its criticism neoessentialism school of
thought has called for the addition of computer science in order to adapt to the latest
changes.
PRACTICE EXERCISES/REFLECTION
REFERENCES
Armstrong, J.S. (2012). Natural Learning in Higher Education, MPRA Paper 37648,
University Library of Munich, Germany. Debra Jones Ringold, 2016.
Demiashkevich, M.J. (1935). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education.
American Book Company. Los Angeles, California. p. 59.
Howick, W.H. (1971). Philosophies of Western Education. Order from Interstate
Printers & Publishers, Danville, III. p. 49.
Sadker, D.M. and Zittleman, K.R. (2006). Teachers, Schools, and Society: A Brief
Introduction to Education. McGraw-Hill Education Europe. London, United
States. p. 29
Sahin, M. (2018). Essentialism In Philosophy, Psychology, Education, Social And
Scientific Scopes. Journal of Innovation in Psychology, Education and
Didactics. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593579.pdf
Wisconsin Historical Society. (n.d.) William Chandler Bagley Photograph. Retrieved
from https://www.wisconsinhistory.org/Records/Image/IM6862