Environmental Auditors Approve Green Labels For Products Linked To Deforestation and Authoritarian Regimes - ICIJ

7/3/23, 15:23 Environmental auditors approve green labels for products linked to deforestation and authoritarian regimes - ICIJ
INVESTIGATIONS LATEST DATA JOURNALISTS LEAK TO ICIJ ABOUT
DONATE
OVERVIEW
Environmental auditors approve

green labels for products linked
to deforestation and
authoritarian regimes
https://www.icij.org/investigations/deforestation-inc/auditors-green-labels-sustainability-environmental-harm/ 1/11
A new ICIJ-led cross-border investigation exposes how a lightly

regulated sustainability industry overlooks forest destruction
and human rights violations when granting environmental
certifications.
By Scilla Alecci
Image: Ricardo Weibezahn / ICIJ
March 1, 2023
Investigations / Deforestation Inc
M
ajor environmental auditing firms ignore or fail to recognize glaring environmental damage caused
by loggers and other clients whose practices they certify as sustainable, undercutting an elaborate
global system meant to fight forest destruction and climate change.
With alarming frequency, the auditors and so-called certification firms validate products linked to deforestation,
logging in conflict zones and other abuses, according to an investigation by the International Consortium of
Investigative Journalists and 39 media partners. Certification helps the firms’ clients produce and promote teak
yacht decks, high-end furniture and other products in markets all around the world.
The ICIJ investigation, Deforestation Inc., showed how companies use the results of flawed audits to advertise
products and operations as compliant with environmental standards, labor laws and human rights, misinforming
shareholders as well as customers. The damage can be devastating and long-lasting.
“A felled tree cannot be replaced in a man’s lifetime,” said a French prosecutor in a recent case involving a
Spanish logging firm that had illegally cut down century-old oaks and other trees in privately owned forests in
Southern France.
A Spanish firm illegally logged trees in this private forest in Perle les Castelets, southern France belonging to Yves and Helene
Rameil
ICIJ found that many companies declared as sustainable forestry operations that fell well short of their own
claims or voluntary standards. For instance, a Brazilian wood products company operating in the Amazon
claimed that it was “certified with flying colours” despite having been fined 37 times since 1998 for stockpiling
and transporting wood without legal documentation, among other violations. A Japanese forestry company in
Chile sourced timber from suppliers that used documents containing false information on the origin of the wood.
A group of Canadian logging companies used a “sustainable forest management plan,” certified by a local
auditor, to cut down trees in Indigenous forestland, drastically altering the community’s territory and way of life,
according to a court ruling.
A still from CBC’s aerial footage of harvesting in First Nations’ territory in British Columbia
ICIJ examined inspection records, environmental violation data and court filings, concerning companies in at
least 50 countries. The analysis identified 48 auditing firms that had declared sustainable the practices of
companies in the forest products industry that had been charged with such violations as logging in Indigenous
forestland and protected reserves, using false permits, and importing illegally harvested timber.
Since 1998, more than 340 certified companies in the forest products industry have been accused of
environmental crimes or other wrongdoing by local communities, environmental groups, and government
agencies, among others. About 50 of those firms held sustainability certificates at the time they were fined or
convicted by a government agency.
Such cases are almost certainly undercounted, in part, because many government databases of environmental
crime don’t identify the companies responsible.
“It’s the whole system that we rely on, on certifications in

general, that doesn’t work”
– Grégoire Jacob, forestry consultant
“It’s the whole system that we rely on, on certifications in general, that doesn’t work,” Grégoire Jacob, a
consultant working in the forest-products industry, told Radio France, an ICIJ partner. “We are led to believe we
will have more virtuous products. Sometimes it’s true; sometimes it’s false.” Jacob was one of six current and
former forestry auditors and consultants who told ICIJ and media partners in France, Canada, the U.S. and
elsewhere that certification standards were inadequate and the procedures ineffective.
The auditors themselves ー who make up a growing $10 billion industry ー are rarely held accountable for
downplaying or missing red flags in clients’ operations and sustainability reports. Environmental auditing differs
from its highly regulated counterpart, traditional financial auditing, and is governed by far fewer rules and
guidelines. Indeed, said Jonathan White, a lawyer at ClientEarth with expertise in corporate responsibility and
climate risk, environmental auditing is largely unregulated.
“In that unregulated space, you have a problem with accountability,” White said. “If those kinds of verification
bodies are to fulfill a role that is kind of robust…they have to apply skepticism and check claims that are made by
companies. They have to go behind the information that companies provide.”
The global investigation also sheds light on governments’ weak efforts to stop the trade of conflict wood from
authoritarian regimes in Myanmar and elsewhere. Sustainability certification firms enable companies at the
center of such trade to mislead the public.
ICIJ’s findings reveal how some companies misrepresent their commitment to ending the global climate crisis
while they exploit precious natural resources under the “sustainability” banner.
Meanwhile, forested areas that, combined, are larger than the European Union have disappeared since 1990. And
more and more forests keep vanishing to provide dubiously labeled products.
Deforestation Inc: How green labels can hide environmental harm
Marketing ‘sustainability’
Over the last two decades, publicly traded multinationals, small suppliers and investment firms have used their
association with voluntary forest-certification schemes to show customers and shareholders that they are
committed to “environmental, social and governance” (ESG) guidelines and that their practices do not harm the
environment. So-called sustainability certifications provided by private bodies are not legally required, but they
have become virtual must-haves for companies that trade, produce or use timber and other commodities
associated with deforestation.
At the heart of this self-regulating system are international organizations such as the Forest Stewardship Council
(FSC), the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) and the Roundtable on Sustainable
Palm Oil (RSPO). They rely on third-party auditing firms to vet clients and certify that wood-product companies,
palm oil producers and others harvest responsibly and don’t use materials linked to illegal logging and other
environmental crimes. (Back in 2007, J.K. Rowling’s U.S. publisher agreed to her wish that FSC-certified paper be
used for the final Harry Potter novel, “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.”)
The environmental auditing sector is part of the $200 billion testing, inspection and certification industry. It
includes specialized units of auditing giants such as KPMG and PwC, large, publicly traded companies such as the
Swiss multinational SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA and smaller firms such as PT Inti Multima Sertifikasi
in Indonesia. The auditors typically perform risk assessments for their clients, inspect mills, interview company
foresters and ensure that operations and products are in line with voluntary environmental standards designed
by private certification organizations.
Some of the auditing firms’ marketing materials trumpet such goals as “protecting the planet’s forests,”
facilitating the “economically feasible exploitation of forests” and “mitigating deforestation.”
Leak to us Contact reporter
Do you have a story about corruption, fraud, or abuse of LEAK TO ICIJ!

power?
ICIJ accepts information about wrongdoing by corporate, government or public services around the world. We do our utmost
to guarantee the confidentiality of our sources.
The conversion of forest to other uses ー such as agriculture or road construction ー and industrial logging in
primary forests are some of the leading causes of climate change. Scientists estimate that these practices are
responsible for more than 10% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, which contribute to global warming.
Forest destruction also aggravates flooding and loss of wildlife habitat, and it contributes to a surge in infectious
disease in humans, according to some scientists. With fewer trees available, some pathogen-carrying bugs
migrate to plants consumed by farm animals that end up in the food chain.
In 2021, U.S. President Joe Biden and more than 100 other world leaders gathering at the United Nations COP26
climate summit in Glasgow vowed “to halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by 2030.” Since then,
governments have promised ー and others approved ー stricter regulations. Private environmental auditing firms
see the renewed forest protection movement as a business opportunity to promote their services helping clients
combat forest loss worldwide.
Experts consider that in countries where deforestation is widespread and forestry governance weak, such as
Brazil, voluntary certification is a better alternative to poorly enforced laws on forest management and supply
chains. But in Brazil, where an estimated 90% of logging is illegal, only a small percentage of companies are
willing to open the books and apply for costly certifications, according to Marcos Planello, a forestry auditor
based in Sao Paulo.
“It’s not a playground. There are people with guns” in the forest, he told ICIJ. “We [auditors] just search for areas
when a company wants to be certified voluntarily.”
Certifications remain a valid way to “reduce risks,” Planello said. “But if a company wants to do something
wrong, they will be able to do it.”
Damage that can’t be calculated
Aerial footage of a clearcut forest in Finland.
During the nine-month Deforestation Inc. investigation, 140 reporters working with ICIJ have followed loggers’
footprints from logged protected woodlands in Finland to clear-cut areas of South Korea to over-harvested
Indigenous forests in British Columbia. They talked to members of Indigenous communities, forest-preservation
advocates, forestry auditors and industry insiders. They examined hundreds of court filings, violation data and
leaked documents in more than a dozen languages. The project spanned the world.
In April 2022, a leading environmental auditing firm certified an Austrian conglomerate’s wood products from
Romania, a country known for its vast old-growth forests, as compliant with environmental standards. Within
months of the certification, Romanian authorities launched an illegal logging investigation into some of the
Austrian giant’s timber suppliers.
Romanian authorities inspect a local timber supplier during an illegal logging investigation in September 2022. Image: Courtesy
of Agent Green
In the U.S., Italy and New Zealand, yacht deck manufacturers and timber traders continue to sport green labels on
marketing materials even while importing teak from Myanmar, where trade in natural resources finances a
military regime that toppled a democratically elected government in 2021.
In Finland, auditors monitoring the forest-management practices of two forestry companies did not mention in
the audit reports that courts had fined their clients for felling trees in biodiversity-rich protected areas; the
companies kept their sustainability certificates. And in Indonesia, one of the world’s largest exporters of tropical
wood and other forest products, environmentalists at the Bogor City-based Independent Forest Monitoring
Network (JPIK) reported that in the last decade, auditing firms missed environmental violations by at least 160
companies.
Legal harvesting of trees but in an area that locals say has been negatively impacted by the pulp industry in Sumatra,
Indonesia. Image: Provided to the CBC
The violations included the use of false permits, illegal logging and destruction of elephant and tiger habitats.
ICIJ’s reporting partners at Tempo, an Indonesian magazine, found in addition that, on some occasions, the
auditors did not demand the client take corrective actions to address the violations.
The auditors’ laissez-faire approach made it possible for the Indonesian companies to use certification to obtain
export licenses for Europe and other markets where buyers were less likely to be aware of the violations, JPIK, the
forest-monitoring network, found.
Even when violators are punished, the penalties cannot compensate for the destruction of primary forests,
wildlife habitats and Indigenous peoples’ lands, according to Danial Dian Prawardani, one of JPIK’s researchers.
“The actual losses far exceed the material fines because the calculation of ecological damage and social impact
can never be measured,” Prawardani told Tempo.
Recommended reading
ACCOUNTABILITY
THE AUDITORS FAQ
How auditing giant KPMG became Frequently asked questions about Green forestry claims tested
a global sustainability leader the Deforestation Inc. MAR 01, 2023
while serving companies accused investigation
of forest destruction
MAR 01, 2023
MAR 01, 2023
Disillusioned auditors
Voluntary forest-certification organizations such as the FSC and the PEFC were founded in the 1990s after
environmentalists and regulators failed to reach an agreement on creating an international legal framework for
forest conservation. Since then, more than a dozen such organizations and many affiliated programs have been
established around the world ー each with its own criteria and label. But FSC and PEFC remain influential. The two
organizations say they have certified as “sustainable” more than 790 million acres of forest and thousands of
products worldwide. Consumers can find their logos stamped on a variety of everyday items, including notebooks
sold at Target in Washington, D.C., candy wrappers in Berlin supermarkets, paper cups in Canadian hotels and
furniture and adult diapers sold on Amazon.
Environmental groups and forestry experts who have compared the FSC and PEFC certification schemes have
often described FSC’s standards as more rigorous and more in line with environmentalists’ preferences while
criticizing the PEFC’s approach as industry-aligned. But in recent years, the reputations of both have been
tarnished by a lack of transparency in their auditing and certification processes, scandals involving certified
clients, conflict-of-interest allegations and a lack of oversight of affiliated auditors.
“If verification bodies are to fulfill a role that is kind of robust…

they have to apply skepticism and check claims that are made
by companies.”
– Jonathan White, lawyer at ClientEarth
Three former forestry auditors interviewed by ICIJ said they took the job because they believed that it could have a
positive effect on the operations of forest-product companies. But they gradually became disillusioned with the
system, they said.
As more brands became willing to pay for green certifications, both organizations relaxed their standards, and
the process became less effective, auditors and forestry experts told ICIJ.
“A lot of people thought it would be a good idea to have these voluntary standards because they see a lot of
horrible forestry going on,” said Bob Bancroft, a biologist and former forestry auditor based in the Canadian
province of Nova Scotia. “Now they’re relieved if they see a green label on a product in the grocery store. They feel
that’s fine and have a clear conscience buying it,” he said. “And that’s what’s wrong with what’s happening
here.”
FSC’s director general, Kim Carstensen, responded to the criticism in an interview with ICIJ and German
broadcaster WDR.
“We believe we are a good label in a number of criteria. We have a governance system that involves stakeholders.
We have strict environmental regulations. We have strict social rules as well,” Carstensen said.
In an ideal world, he added, governments would play a larger role in forest protection.
“But the situation is not an ideal world,” Carstensen said. “So in a situation where a government allows logging
in an area where there is a question of whether this is responsible management or not so responsible
management, we think certification should still play a role, and we think FSC certification could be the case in
that situation.”
As a “voluntary tool,” FSC “does not claim it can solely solve multi-layered problems such as deforestation,” a
spokesperson added in a statement.
FSC uses a firm called Assurance Services International (ASI) to accredit auditors and monitor their activities. ASI
declined to address ICIJ questions about how companies certified by ASI-accredited auditors later were accused of
environmental or other wrongdoing. In a statement to ICIJ, a spokesperson for Bonn-based ASI said its
investigators had “blocked” 88 companies holding FSC certifications in the last five years, stripping them of the
certification. “If we identify integrity risks, then we follow up on it with rigor,” the spokesperson said.
PEFC’s head of communications, Thorsten Arndt, said that the “credibility of PEFC and other certification
systems has been assessed multiple times,” adding that the United Nations has recognized the group PEFC “as an
indicator for progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Biodiversity Agreement,” a
series of social and environmental goals.
Arndt wrote that PEFC sets and revises its standards based on “the latest scientific knowledge, research and
relevant emerging issues” to ensure that forests are “managed sustainably.”
A sign with the PEFC seal and the inscription “This forest is different” along a hiking trail in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany. Image:
Matthias Bein/picture alliance via Getty Images
Arndt also disputed critics’ claims that PEFC is industry friendly, saying that the organization was founded by
small- and family-forest owners and that the forest-product industry remains only one of nine stakeholder
groups that set PEFC standards, along with Indigenous communities, trade unions and other non-industry
actors.
For their part, auditing firms said that the third-party verification system had contributed overall to improving
the management of forests around the world, increased scrutiny and required greater transparency of forest-
product companies.
Firms contacted by ICIJ conceded that there may be cases where an auditor overlooks or misunderstands
problems or even clients’ fraudulent intentions. But, they said, those represent only a small percentage of the
audited cases.
“To the critics who claim that certification is simply greenwashing PR, I would say that they are trying to use the
exception to prove the rule,” said Linda Brown, co-founder of U.S.-based auditing firm SCS Global Services.
WANT MORE STORIES THAT ROCK THE WORLD?

ICIJ is an independent, donor-supported investigative news outlet. Together, we expose wrongdoing so
that the world can make it right.
Just $10 / month can change the world.
GIVE MONTHLY GIVE ONE TIME
In search of a solution
Governments around the world have started to pay attention to companies’ claims that they are eco-friendly, but
so far only a handful have taken action.
In 2021, consumer-protection agencies in the U.K. and the Netherlands examined hundreds of company websites
and determined that 40% of claims of eco-friendliness “could be misleading consumers.” The Australian
Competition and Consumer Committee launched a similar examination last fall.
And the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, is considering legislation targeting so-called
greenwashing practices, defined as marketing that relies on “misleading environmental claims.” The
commission is responding to findings that nearly half of such claims, across several economic sectors, “may be
false or deceptive.”
A leaked draft of the proposal indicates that EU countries would impose “effective, proportionate and dissuasive”
penalties on companies that make environmental claims, unsupported by evidence, about their products. It also
says authorities would rely on “independent verifiers” to demonstrate that the claims have substance. A first
official draft of the legislation is expected late this month.
It is not clear at this stage whether auditors will be under scrutiny in the EU or other jurisdictions that are
considering anti-greenwashing measures. Grant Rosoman, a senior adviser to Greenpeace International who
specializes in forest issues, remarked that auditing and certification firms generally evade the spotlight that
exposes the company making the product or the company selling the product. “The certification bodies in
between don’t tend to surface as part of the picture,” Rosoman said, “even though, in a sense, they are one of the
biggest parts of the problem in terms of the weaknesses in these systems.”
When auditing is poorly done, “a lot of bad practices slip through,” said Rosoman, who has researched
certification systems and auditors. “These problems allow deforestation to continue on the ground, allow human
rights [abuses] to continue, allow illegalities to continue.”
Contributing reporters: Agustin Armendariz, Jelena Cosic, Emilia Diaz-Struck, Miguel Fiandor, Karrie Kehoe,
Brenda Medina, Delphine Reuter, Margot Williams (ICIJ), Anne-Laure Barral (Radio France), Allan de Abreu,
Luiz Fernando de Toledo and Bernardo Esteves (Piauí), Attila Biro (Context), Petra Blum (WDR), Krisna
Pradipta (Tempo), Stefan Melichar (Profil), Francisca Skoknic (LaBot), Kirsi Skön (YLE), Lina Verschwele (Der
Spiegel).
Topics: Accountability, Asia-Pacific, DONATE

Auditors, Canada, Deforestation Inc,
Environment, Europe, Investigative reporting
Contact reporter Our team
Scilla Alecci
Reporter and Asia and Europe
coordinator
Contact
WANT TO KNOW WHEN WE

PUBLISH? Enter your email
SIGN UP
Help us change the world. Get our stories by email.
Latest from Deforestation Inc
WANT MORE
ACCOUNTABILITY
VIDEO FAQ INSIDE STORY
STORIES THAT
Green forestry Watch: How Frequently About the ROCK THE
claims tested
MAR 01, 2023
green labels
can hide
asked
questions
Deforestation
Inc.
WORLD?
environmental about the investigation
harm Deforestation Just $10 / month can change the world.
MAR 01, 2023
Inc.
MAR 01, 2023 GIVE MONTHLY GIVE ONE TIME
investigation
MAR 01, 2023
Recent investigations More
Deforestation Inc Shadow Diplomats Trafficking Inc.
ICIJ is dedicated to ensuring all reports we publish are accurate. If you believe you have found an inaccuracy let us know.
ABOUT US INVESTIGATIONS FOLLOW US
Our team Deforestation Inc Newsletter

Our supporters Shadow Diplomats Instagram
1730 Rhode Island Ave NW, Suite 317 ICIJ's Awards Trafficking Inc. Facebook
Washington, D.C. 20036 USA Corporate Hidden Treasures Twitter
contact@icij.org Work with us The Uber Files LinkedIn

Journalists More investigations RSS
All topics
© 2023 — The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. All rights reserved.

Environmental Auditors Approve Green Labels For Products Linked To Deforestation and Authoritarian Regimes - ICIJ

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Environmental Auditors Approve Green Labels For Products Linked To Deforestation and Authoritarian Regimes - ICIJ

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7/3/23, 15:23 Environmental auditors approve green labels for products linked to deforestation and authoritarian regimes - ICIJ

INVESTIGATIONS LATEST DATA JOURNALISTS LEAK TO ICIJ ABOUT

Environmental auditors approve

A new ICIJ-led cross-border investigation exposes how a lightly

Investigations / Deforestation Inc

“It’s the whole system that we rely on, on certifications in

Deforestation Inc: How green labels can hide environmental harm

Leak to us Contact reporter

Do you have a story about corruption, fraud, or abuse of LEAK TO ICIJ!

Damage that can’t be calculated

Aerial footage of a clearcut forest in Finland.

“If verification bodies are to fulfill a role that is kind of robust…

WANT MORE STORIES THAT ROCK THE WORLD?

Just $10 / month can change the world.

GIVE MONTHLY GIVE ONE TIME

Topics: Accountability, Asia-Pacific, DONATE

Contact reporter Our team

WANT TO KNOW WHEN WE

Latest from Deforestation Inc

Recent investigations More

Deforestation Inc Shadow Diplomats Trafficking Inc.

ABOUT US INVESTIGATIONS FOLLOW US

Our team Deforestation Inc Newsletter

contact@icij.org Work with us The Uber Files LinkedIn

© 2023 — The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. All rights reserved.

You might also like