Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful

career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both
views and give your opinion.
3–4–4–3
P1: Hook, Paraphrased statement, Thesis statement
Nowadays, pursuing future career has been a growing concern especially for those in education
institutions. It is true as some argue that entering a varsity will guarantee a promising career in the future
whereas others reckon working right after school is a better option. This essay will elaborate these two
constrasting points of view.
P2

S1: Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a
successful career
S2: +, advantages, benefits

S3; others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school

S4: -, disadvantages, drawbacks

On the one hand, many vacancies are open with only certain qualifications should be met. One of the
basic requirements is the presence of a degree related to the pursued job, making the process of job
seeking more streamlined. However, looking for a job straight after school is considered by many as a
choice due to the fact that not all of the students could afford tuition fees. Therefore, having a job after
graduated from school is the best way to help them financially independent.
P3

S1: Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a
successful career
S2: -, disadvantages, drawbacks

S3; others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school

S4: -, disadvantages, drawbacks

On the other hand, for some students going to university involves taking out an alternative funding such
as personal saving, loan and even scholarship to cover tuition and living cost. While a university degree
will leave your career more open-ended in terms of future opportunities, many would suffer in the long
run because of the obligation to repay the debt as well as to finish the study on time.
P4: Restatement, your stance
Nowadays, pursuing future career has been a growing concern especially for those in education
institutions. It is true as some argue that entering a varsity will guarantee a promising career in the future
whereas others reckon working right after school is a better option. This essay will elaborate these two
constrasting points of view.
On the one hand, many vacancies are open with only certain qualifications should be met. One of the
basic requirements is the presence of a degree related to the pursued job, making the process of job
seeking more streamlined. However, looking for a job straight after school is considered by many as a
choice due to the fact that not all of the students could afford tuition fees. Therefore, having a job after
graduated from school is the best way to help them financially independent.
On the other hand, for some students going to university involves taking out an alternative funding such
as personal saving, loan and even scholarship to cover tuition and living cost. While a university degree
will leave your career more open-ended in terms of future opportunities, many would suffer in the long
run because of the obligation to repay the debt as well as to finish the study on time.
In conclusion, getting a job right after school could offer a great number of advantages such as to secure
ones’ life economically. Some drawbacks, however, may persist when it comes to working after
graduation relating to the fundings. Thus, I believe studying at higher education could provide more
advantages for better future jobs.
Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and
cinema. Others feel that violent films should be not released. Discuss both views and give your
opinion?
Obscure statement = vague
Timmy: For some people, it is understandable that completing college and universities is the first
supreme ticket for getting a job. It is generally believed that for some colleges and universities it can be a
privilege for finding jobs, but that doesn’t mean that it could be a straight way to get a job.
Pie: Many persons think if learning at college is will be the greatest method to get excellent job. On the
other hand people still trust to immediately find a work. This essay shares the conclusion of two different
sides of view.
Rexel: It is a fact that being a successful person in the future is all of our goal and there are so many
points of view about that. For example, there are opinions that enrolled to college right after school is the
greatest way to be successful. Otherwise, there are people that prefer to get a job straight after graduated.
Andri: Some people argue about looking for career is important thing to decide for good life. Two
choices people think are getting higher education in post school is good opinion while other think looking
a job immediately is better after graduated school.
Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and
cinema. Others feel that violent films should be not released. Discuss both views and give your
opinion?
Opinionated Essay
Andri: Some people concern about law-violated contents on movies. It is true as some argue about
violent scenes should be prohibited and other think the current regulations are sufficient for movie
industry. This essay will discuss these two points of view.
On the one hand, regulating violence contents should be embraced to reduce negative impacts such as the
potential of horrible actions from being emulated by the viewers. These limitations could be also applied
to keep the creators’s creativity so that the audiences, especially the underages, could still enjoy the
movie. However, violent films are not suitable to release publicly in order to reduce crimes. It is because
some people for some reason may get inspired by what they see.
On the other hand, some people think strict regulations would diminish a certain level of creativity
leading to the difficulties in manifesting ideas of the directors.
Timmy: Some proposed regulations to limit violence levels on screen could affect the movie industry.
Some people think that it is a must to restrict the degree of violence in a cinefilm. The control itself may
be giving impact to the movie creators and the viewers. This essay will discuss both sides of the impacts
regarding the restraint of the violence.
As we know, the purposes of the limits to the brutality is to educate the audience. Therefore, they would
acknowledge the limits from copying the action that can be dangerous for others. It can prevent the risks
if they all are well educated. Children can also be triggered if there is no restriction about the violence
because they are still young and still cannot filter the right thing to do.
On the other hand, there might be some unwelcoming results on the video creators due to the strict
regulations. Which can result in a shut the idea for the film makers.
Pie: Many people think contents censorship is needed on television and cinema, hence, the proposed bans
on violent movies. This essay will discuss both of two different sides of view.
Regulation for violence in movies will be a better option for the film industry to the continuous efforts of
our government to reduce crime rate. On the other hand, banning violent films is a good choice to avoid
bad effects of watching violent movies.
However, cutting the scenes on the film will make the storyline messy. As though, it could eliminate most
of the important parts of the stories.
Rexel: Many people enjoy watching films whether on television or at a cinema. To make it more
enjoyable, some of them think that the level of violence for films must be regulated by the government.
However, there are some people feel that the regulation should not be applied. This essay will discuss
about the advantages and the disadvantages from both of the opinions.
First of all, the advantages if the government filtered the films

Ikhlas: In this day and age, several people think that regulating the level of violence in televisions and
movies is necessary while others argue that movies which contain harshness should not be banned. This
essay will elaborate the opinions between regulating movies' content and banning all violent contents that
are displayed for the audience.
On the one hand, the way to limit each displayed content is an important thing for government to save
children from the inappropriate programs. However, until now, it is not determined by the authorities due
to some considerations. According to the Communication Minister, she said that the ministry lacks of
ability for censoring movie in television because they are limited by contitution to do that. For instance,
the ministry must request assistance from the film censorship board to censor all violent contents. Thus,
the mentioned condition can not be considered as the government must work together with the board.