Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Books
Books
Books
Batis specifically covers the first-hand accounts, controversies, and conflicting views in Philippine history as
well as the mandated topics on the Philippine Constitution, agrarian reform, and taxation. It also features
historical sites, museums, and shrines to promote and preserve the country''''s historical and cultural
heritage. Finally, relevant yet interesting exercises complement the discussions for students to develop
their historical and critical consciousness so that, as what the Commission on Higher Education envisions,
they will become versatile, articulate, broad-minded, morally upright, and responsible citizens.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF BATIS:
- Primary Sources
- Secondary Sources
Primary sources are usually defined as first hand information or data that is generated by witnesses or
participants in past events. Primary sources are characterized not by their format but rather by the
information they convey and their relationship to the research question. They include letters, diaries,
journals, newspapers, photographs, and other immediate accounts. The interpretation and evaluation of
these sources becomes the basis for research.
Primary sources provide raw information and first-hand evidence. Examples include interview transcripts,
statistical data, and works of art. A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research.
Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples
include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. A secondary source describes, interprets, or
synthesizes primary sources.
When you cite a secondary source, it’s usually not to analyse it directly. Instead, you’ll probably test its
arguments against new evidence or use its ideas to help formulate your own.
Letters and diaries written by a historical figure Biography of the historical figure
Government documents about a new policy Newspaper article about the new policy
Results of an opinion poll Blog post interpreting the results of the poll
Documentaries
If you are researching the causes of World War II, a recent documentary about the war is a secondary
source. But if you are researching the filmmaking techniques used in historical documentaries, the
documentary is a primary source.
Does this source come from someone directly involved in the events I’m studying (primary) or from
another researcher (secondary)?
Am I interested in analyzing the source itself (primary) or only using it for background information
(secondary)?
Does the source provide original information (primary) or does it comment upon information from
other sources (secondary)?