Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MARK3300 Peer - Evaluation - Form
MARK3300 Peer - Evaluation - Form
It is expected that all team members will contribute equally to the project. As in the
business world, all members of a team will normally receive the same grade for a given
piece of teamwork.
If a student allows his/her name to stand on teamwork submitted in the course when in
fact there was essentially no contribution made, then that student is guilty of Academic
Misconduct. In the event there is a case of Academic Misconduct, the guilty person will
receive a grade of zero on the teamwork submitted and further consequences may
result.
Team member’s Came to Work was Did their Came to Easy to Overall
name at least completed fair class work with, rating
(include 90% of on time & share of regularly neither out of 10
yourself) the was good the work for on controlling
meetings quality project nor
issues combative
On the other side of this page, please provide a short description of why you believe any person
in your team deserves a lower grade.
1|Page
Peer Evaluation Form - Confidential
Below, clearly explain why you believe any person(s) in your team deserve(s) a lower
grade. You must provide objective facts AND evidence to support your position.
This includes specific information like dates of missed meetings, sample of inferior
work submitted, dates of missed classes and meetings, etc.
Evaluations which do not include objective facts AND evidence like these will not be
considered. You must attach any evidence to this form when submitting the hard copy.
In the event of a student appeal, you will be required to attend the proceedings and
to produce any relevant information to support your position.
Signature: ________________________________________________________
2|Page