Review Form of JMST

Paper Title: A Brief Review On Fins

Author(s): Abhinav.Sreekumar#1, Abhinav.Roy*2, Abhijeet Singh#3 Abhishek Kumar#4 Abhishek Kumar Jha#5
Ankush Pawar #6 Nitin Korde#7
1,2,3,4,5
Intern Cadets BTech Marine Engineering Tolani Maritime Institute (Indian Maritime University
6
Research Scholar: “G H Raisonai College of Engineering and Management ,Pune,
e-mail: ankush.pawar.phdme@ghrcem.raisoni.net” ,
7
G H Raisoni Institute of Engineering and Technology, Pune e-mail: nitin.korde@raisoni.net

valuation Criterion
  Poor Fair Good Very Good Outstanding

Originality ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Innovation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Technical merit ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Applicability ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Presentation and English ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Match to Journal Topic ○ ○ ○ ○ ○

Recommendation to Editors
  Strongly Reject Reject Marginally Accept Accept Strong Accept

Recommendation ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Comments:
1. 49% similarity index is found by Turnitin software.
2. Whole paper summary is not reflected by abstract.
3. In introduction section no objective or goal of study is discussed.
4. A general conclusion is carried out and no quantification of heat loss with different fin design is discussed.
5. Result and discussion need more comparison with help from comparative data and graph.
6. In acknowledgement singular first-person pronouns are used in place of plural.

1. Does this paper provide an original contribution to the knowledge or practice of automation technology in construction?
Yes
2. Is the text concise and written using correct style of the English language? Is the text of the paper structured and organized
in a logical fashion? Provide relevant comments directly on the manuscript if feasible. Yes

3. Are relevant references cited in appropriate places in the text? Is an adequate list of references provided at the end of the
text?
Yes

4. Are all figures, tables and photographs of acceptable quality for publication in a professional journal? Yes

5. Are all mathematical symbols properly defined and correctly used? Are the results of all calculations correct? Are SI units
of measurements used throughout the paper? Yes

6. Does the paper provide appropriate thought-provoking conclusions from the work and information presented? Yes