Sierra took credit for a report Malala wrote and submitted on her behalf. The boss praised Sierra instead of Malala, undermining their employee-employee relationship and workplace dynamics. Mario consistently objected to company decisions on social media, damaging the company image, so the company rightfully terminated him. Person A informed friend B but not acquaintance C about important information, which was unjustified as an employee should share relevant information with all coworkers.
Sierra took credit for a report Malala wrote and submitted on her behalf. The boss praised Sierra instead of Malala, undermining their employee-employee relationship and workplace dynamics. Mario consistently objected to company decisions on social media, damaging the company image, so the company rightfully terminated him. Person A informed friend B but not acquaintance C about important information, which was unjustified as an employee should share relevant information with all coworkers.
Sierra took credit for a report Malala wrote and submitted on her behalf. The boss praised Sierra instead of Malala, undermining their employee-employee relationship and workplace dynamics. Mario consistently objected to company decisions on social media, damaging the company image, so the company rightfully terminated him. Person A informed friend B but not acquaintance C about important information, which was unjustified as an employee should share relevant information with all coworkers.
Sierra took credit for a report Malala wrote and submitted on her behalf. The boss praised Sierra instead of Malala, undermining their employee-employee relationship and workplace dynamics. Mario consistently objected to company decisions on social media, damaging the company image, so the company rightfully terminated him. Person A informed friend B but not acquaintance C about important information, which was unjustified as an employee should share relevant information with all coworkers.
Malala wrote a very good report to be submitted the
next day. Since she will be absent, she asks Sierra to give it to their boss the next day. Upon reception of the report, the BOSS praised Sierra instead of Malala. Sierra did not say a thing but instead also welcomed the praise. What do you think is wrong about the situation? What are the possible consequences of what has taken place above the following area: - Employee to Employee relationship. - Work Place Relationship Mario is noted as a consistent objector in the company. Every decision of the management, he always has a negative comment about such or is always against it. To add further he always posts in his social media account negative comments about the different aspects of the organization, This continued until the company decided to terminate her for causing damage to the company image.
What makes the action of Mario wrong?
Is the company management justifiable in terminating
Mario? Person A, B, and C are employees of Company XY. Person A and B are good friends while Person A and C are not. It so happens that both Person B and C were absent when important information was given. Person A informed B about the information given. But when it comes to C, he only said "It is his problem, not mine. He should exert an effort to know what transpired in his absence".