Alfauzaan 2021 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 694 012009

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS
Consumer preference for some genotypes of ornamental chili (Capsicum

spp.) population F2
To cite this article: DF Alfauzaan and Warid 2021 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 694 012009
View the article online for updates and enhancements.
This content was downloaded from IP address 180.244.233.241 on 16/03/2021 at 07:05

International e-Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Farming System IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 694 (2021) 012009 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/694/1/012009
Consumer preference for some genotypes of ornamental chili

(Capsicum spp.) population F2
DF Alfauzaan1 and Warid2*

1
Student of study program Agroecotechnology, Faculty Of Bioindustry, Trilogy
University Jl. TMP. Kalibata No.4, DKI Jakarta 12760 Telp/Fax (021) 7980011/(021)
7981352
2
Lecture of study program Agroecotechnology, Faculty Of Bioindustry, Trilogy
University
*Email: warid@trilogi.ac.id
Abstract. The experiment was conducted to determine the characteristics of ornamental chili
plants from several genotypes in the F2 population by consumer desires. This research performed
using a single plant method. The planted community consists of all the elders (P) and crossing
results. This study uses survey techniques and questionnaires as research aids in obtaining
ornamental chili character information that is the public likes. Consumer preference test results
(I) against 14 genotypes show that the average consumer most wants TR 23 x TR 25U (1) in
some of the characters tested: the leaf color, habitus, and fruit color characters. Genotype TR23
x TR 25U (1) has a dark green leaf color character with a scale of 5 based on the IRRI Leaf Color
Chart, a compact habitus, and has two color changes in the fruit, green-red and purple-red. Based
on the results of the consumer preference test (II) on four genotypes, it shows that there is no
difference in the average value of consumer preferences in the genotypes TR 23B x Ayesha (3),
TR 25U, and TR 25 x Ayesha (2) in the characters tested.
1. Introduction
Chili is an important crop that has good economic prospects in Indonesia. This can be seen from the
amount of chili consumption, in 2016 consumption (kg / capita / year) for chili total consumption of
2.90 kg / capita, in 2017 (2.95 kg / capita), in 2018 (3.00 kg / capita) and 2019 (3.05 kg / capita) [1].
Currently, most people in Indonesia are more familiar with chili as a raw material for cooking, such as
red chili and cayenne pepper. However, very few people know about ornamental chili. This can be
caused by ornamental chili, which is usually only planted as an aesthetic enhancer, although it is edible
as a regular chili [2]. According to Rafiani [3], the availability of ornamental chili seeds that are still
imported, and the price is quite high, making the public's interest in ornamental chili becomes low. Also,
besides the taste of ornamental chili is less spicy, not following Indonesian people’s habits. It is
necessary to hybridize the special characters in the elders, so that these special characters can be
collected on the desired sapling plant.
Hybridization aims to produce saplings of plants that have a variety of characters from both parents.
The appearance of the combination of the characters of elders in their offspring is called segregation.
The best or maximum segregation occurs when the offspring population is in the second generation (F2).
Therefore, in the F2 population, it is necessary to evaluate the character to direct the breeding program
by the initial purpose of the hybridization.
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
Based on observations made by several researchers at the University of Florida, U.S.A [4] it is known
that most of the fresh products offered at supermarkets show excellent performance, but they taste like
water bags. Responding to this condition, the researchers tried to reposition consumer preferences as
one of the references in the design of ornamental chili plants. Based on the above, this study aims to
analyze consumer preferences for the desired character of several genotypes of the ornamental chili
population of F2.
2. Materials and methods

This research was conducted from November 2019 until April 2020. This research was carried in the
Experimental Garden and Agroecotechnology integrated laboratory of Trilogi University, Jakarta. The
planting material used was the seeds of the parents, genotypes TR 3, TR 23, TR 25U, TR 25H, and
Pelita, as well as the F2 seeds from crosses: TR 3 x Ayesha, TR 23B x Ayesha (4), TR 23 x Pelita, TR
25 x Pelita, Pelita x TR 3, TR 23B x Ayesha (1), TR 25U x Ayesha (1), TR 25U x Ayesha (2), TR 23 x
TR 25U (1), TR 23B x TR 23A (2), TR 19 x Ayesha, TR 25 x Ayesha (2), TR 23B x Ayesha (3). The
planting media used was mixtures of the roasted husk, Lembang soil, and manure with a ratio of 1: 1:
1. Besides, NPK fertilizer 16-16-16 was used in this study, and pesticides in the pests and plant diseases.
The tools needed for this study are standard plant cultivation tools, 25 cm plant pots, plastic tray for
nursery, para net, IRRI leaf color chart, raffia ropes, labels, cameras, questionnaires, and stationery.
This study was conducted using a single plant method by planting all plants in the same planting
environment without repetition. The planted population consists of all the elders (P) and crossing results
(F2). Observations were made on all plants in the population. This study uses survey techniques and
questionnaires as research aids. The approach used in this research is a quantitative descriptive approach.
The object of this research is consumers consisting of the general public. The scope of the study is
limited to consumer preferences for ornamental chili in the city of Jakarta. The sampling technique uses
the Simple Random Sampling method because the sampling of population members is done randomly.
Observation of preferences in this study, only carried out on a few characters (leaf color, habitus,
fruit color, and the scent) using the results of survey analysis. The analytical method used is a Likert
scale. Sorting the level of answers given by respondents used the scoring method. The scoring method
is the assignment of scores in the form of numbers to the answers to questions that have been asked in
the questionnaire to get quantitative data. In this study, the sequence in scoring is as follows [5]:
Table 1. Examples of assessment indicators on
a Likert Scale
Statement Score
Very dislike 1
Dislike 2
Neutral 3
Like 4
Very Like 5
The results of the respondents' assessment were then tested using the One-way ANOVA with STAR
software, and if the results obtained were significantly affected, the mid-value test using Duncan's
Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level.
3. Results and discussions
3.1. The General condition of the Experiment

Planting seedlings are carried out at the Net House Agroecotechnology Study Program, Faculty of
Bioindustry, Trilogy University, on the 14th of November 2019. The nursery is done at the end of the
dry season, so incentives must be watered to prevent drought. Ornamental chili seeds that already have
3-4 true leaves are ready to be transplanted into a 25 cm pot.
Transplanting was carried out at the Trilogy University experimental garden, with a height of 7
meters above sea level [6]. Transplanting is done two times, because of differences in seeding time. The
2
first transplanting was carried out on December 6, 2019, and the second transplanting was carried out
on December 9, 2019. Based on table 2, the weather at the time of the transplanting is the beginning of
entering the rainy season with a temperature of 28.54 oC, humidity 79.4%, rainfall 296 mm, and a long
exposure time of 5.1 hours.
The growth of ornamental chili plants experienced considerable obstacles/disturbances, so growth
was not optimal. Rain intensity is high enough to damage the ornamental chili plants that have just been
moved to the field. Therefore, a para net of 50% is installed to reduce the intensity of rainwater splashing
on the plant parts. Weather conditions that enter the rainy season can affect pest and disease disturbances
in the growth of ornamental chili plants, so that plant growth is less than optimal [7].
Table 2. Jakarta weather data in November 2019-April 2020
Average Rain
Humidity Long
Month temperature intensity
(%) exposure (jam)
(°C) (mm)
November
2019 29.56 71.78 59.05 6.72
December 2019 28.54 79.4 296 5.105
January 2020 27.97 83.18 649.6 3.55
February 2020 27.76 84.08 892.4 3.05
March 2020 28.57 80.53 215.9 4.64
April 2020 29.05 79.16 162.5 5.58
Source: Online Data of Badan Meteorogi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika 2020 [8]
Pests and diseases found attacking ornamental chili plantations during cultivation are grasshoppers
(Caelifera), thrips (Thrips parvispinus Karny), and fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp). It is also
reported by Meilin [9] that pests and diseases that can attack chili plants in the fields include Thrips
(Thrips parvispinus Karny), whitefly (Bemisia tabaci), aphids (Aphid), mites (Polyphagotarsonemus
latus and Tetranychus sp.), and fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f.sp). Control of pests and diseases
that attack ornamental chili plants can be controlled using Curacron according to the recommended
dosage. Spraying is done every plant indicated to have been affected by pests and diseases using a hand
sprayer.
3.2. Consumer preference

Preference theory can be used to analyze the level of consumer satisfaction with a product [8]. Testing
consumer preferences in this study is divided into two parts, namely consumer preferences (I) and
consumer preferences (II). The division of testing was carried out because of differences in the time of
growth performance of several planted genotypes, so that it was not possible to be done simultaneously.
Consumer preferences (I) consist of 14 genotypes, namely: Pelita x TR3, Pelita, TR23, TR23B x Ayesha
(1), TR23B x Ayesha (4), TR23B x TR23A (2), TR23 x Pelita, TR23 x TR25U (1), TR25H, TR25U x
Ayesha (1), TR25U x Ayesha (2), TR25 x Pelita, TR3, and TR3 x Ayesha. Consumer preferences (II)
consist of 4 genotypes, namely: TR19 x Ayesha, TR23B x Ayesha (3), TR25U, and TR25 x Ayesha (2).
Respondents who rate the two preference tests are different people.
The consumer preference assessment (I) was tested by 35 respondents of various backgrounds such
as students, private employees, freelancers, entrepreneurs, housewifes, and retirees. Likewise, with the
sex of the respondents, which consisted of 23% men and 77% women. The age level of respondents
ranged from 20 to 70 years. The test was carried out by filling the questionnaire on four qualitative
ornamental chili characters: leaf color, habitus, fruit color, and the scent.
Based on Table 3, generally, only the scent characters have no value with significant differences
between all genotypes tested. The genotype TR23 x TR 25U (1), is the genotype most preferred by the
average consumer based on the color of the leaves, habitus, and fruit color with sequential average values
of 4.54, 4.09, and 4.34. Genotype TR 23 x TR25U (1) has a dark green leaf color character with a scale
3
of 5 based on the IRRI Leaf Color Chart, a compact habitus, and has two color changes in the fruit,
green-red and purple-red.
Table 3. Consumer Preference Test Results (I)

Genotype Leaf color Habitus Fruit color The scent
Pelita x TR3 4.34 ab 3.97 ab 4.00 ab 3.49
Pelita 3.54 ef 3.46 def 3.77 bcd 3.23
TR23 3.71 def 3.51 cdef 3.97 ab 3.14
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 3.86 cdef 3.91 abc 3.94 b 3.31
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 3.49 f 3.23 f 3.66 bcd 3.26
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.66 def 3.40 def 3.40 d 3.2
TR23 x Pelita 4.09 bcd 3.77 abcde 3.97 ab 3.43
TR23 x TR25U (1) 4.54 a 4.09 a 4.34 a 3.71
TR25H 3.80 def 3.60 bcdef 3.77 bcd 3.26
TR25U x Ayesha (1) 3.94 bcde 3.80 abcd 3.74 bcd 3.23
TR25U x Ayesha (2) 3.57 ef 3.37 ef 3.80 bcd 3.23
TR25 x Pelita 4.26 abc 3.89 abc 3.91 bc 3.37
TR3 3.51 ef 3.29 f 3.51 cd 3.17
TR3 x Ayesha 3.83 def 3.80 abcd 3.77 bcd 3.14
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant difference at the 5%
level
The genotype TR23B x Ayesha(4) had the lowest values in leaf and habitus color with an average
value of /3.49 and 3.23, respectively. However it was not significantly different from the average habitus
character value of the genotype TR3 with a value of 3.29. The lowest average value of fruit color
characters is owned by the genotype TR23B x TR23A (2). The genotype TR23B x Ayesha (4) has a
green leaf color character on a scale of 4 based on the IRRI Leaf Color Chart and upright habitus. While
the genotype TR23B x TR23A (2), has two color changes, namely green-red and purple-red.
The assessment of consumer preferences is then divided into two parts, namely preferences based on
gender and preferences based on age range. As seen in Table 4, the scent character has no value with a
significant difference between all genotypes tested based on the sex of consumers, both male and female.
Based on consumers of male sex on leaf color characters, the highest average of 4.62 is in the
genotype TR 23 X TR 25U (1) green leaf color on a scale of 5, and the lowest average of 3.12 is on the
TR3 genotype with green leaf color on a scale 5. Likewise, for female respondents, the highest average
for leaf color characters belong to the genotype TR23 X TR25U (1) with a green leaf color scale of 5
and the lowest average for the genotype Pelita with a green leaf color scale of 5, TR23B x Ayesha (4)
with a green leaf color scale 4, and TR25U x Ayesha (2) with a green leaf color scale 4 and a purple-
green strip, each genotype has an average value of 3.52, 3.48, and 3.56. The results of the above
assessment indicate that preferences based on leaf color characters in the sexes of men and women have
the same taste.
Habitus character assessment results, male consumers like genotype TR 25 x Pelita with upright
habitus, TR 23 x Pelita with upright habitus, TR 25U x Ayesha (1) with compact habitus, and TR 23B
x Ayesha (1) with compact habitus which has an average value that is not significantly different, namely
4.14, 4.12, 4.07, and 4.00. The average assessment of female gender consumer preferences shows that
TR23 x TR25U (1) with compact habitus is the most preferred genotype in habitus character with an
average value of 4.26, so the habitus character, male and female consumers have different tastes of
genotype.
Based on fruit color character assessment, male consumers like eight genotypes that are not
significantly different, namely genotype TR23 x TR25U (1) (green-red and purple-red), TR23 (dark
purple-red), TR3 x Ayesha (light green-orange, red), TR23 x Pelita (dark purple-red), TR25 x Pelita
(green-red), TR23B x Ayesha (4) (dark purple-red and light green-orange, red), TR 25U x Ayesha ( 1)
4
(green-red and dark purple-red), and TR23B x Ayesha (1) (green-red and purple-orange, red) with values
of 4.14, 4.12, 4.07, 4.02, 4.01, 4.00, 3.97, and 3.95. Based on female consumer preferences, the most
preferred fruit color is the genotype TR 23 x TR 25U (1) (green-red and purple-red) with an average
value of 4.40. However, it does not differ significantly with the genotype Pelita x TR3 (green-red and
purple-red) with an average value of 4.42 fruit color characters. In contrast to male consumers, the
average female consumer looks consistent with the preferred genotype. In general, the genotype TR23
x TR25U (1) is the genotype with the highest average rating of all characters observed.
Table 4. Consumer preference test results (I) based on gender

Male Female
Genotype Leaf Fruit The Leaf Fruit The
Habitus Habitus
color Color Scent Color color Scent
Pelita x TR3 4.12 ab 3.70 ab 3.27 bc 3.38 4.41 ab 4.18 ab 4.42 a 3.52
Pelita 3.62 ab 3.50 ab 3.38 b 2.88 3.52 c 3.39 def 3.41 e 3.33
TR23 3.88 ab 3.75 ab 4.12 a 3.13 3.67 bc 3.51 cdef 3.87 c 3.15
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 3.88 ab 4.00 a 3.95 a 3.25 3.85 abc 3.86 abc 4.02 b 3.33
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 3.50 ab 3.00 b 4.00 a 3.38 3.48 c 3.26 ef 3.78 d 3.22
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.75 ab 3.50 ab 3.09 bc 3.13 3.63 bc 3.12 f 3.01 f 3.22
TR23 x Pelita 4.38 ab 4.12 a 4.02 a 3.63 4.00 abc 3.81 abcd 4.00 b 3.37
TR23 x TR25U (1) 4.62 a 3.80 ab 4.14 a 3.63 4.52 a 4.26 a 4.40 a 3.74
TR25H 3.75 ab 3.30 ab 3.14 bc 3.5 3.81 abc 3.26 ef 3.03 f 3.19
TR25U x Ayesha (1) 4.12 ab 4.07 a 3.97 a 2.75 3.89 abc 3.70 cde 3.77 d 3.37
TR25U x Ayesha (2) 3.62 ab 3.30 ab 3.18 bc 3 3.56 c 3.37 def 3.37 e 3.3
TR25 x Pelita 4.25 ab 4.14 a 4.01 a 3.63 4.26 abc 3.80 bcd 3.98 b 3.3
TR3 3.12 b 3.05 b 3.00 c 2.88 3.63 bc 3.23 f 3.04 f 3.26
TR3 x Ayesha 3.88 ab 3.80 ab 4.07 a 3.38 3.81 abc 3.89 abc 3.71 d 3.07
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant difference at the 5% level.
Table 5. Consumer preferences (I) in leaf color

characters based on the age range
Genotype Range I Range II Range III

Pelita x TR3 4 4.56 ab 4.41 a
Pelita 3.78 3.11 b 3.65 ab
TR23 4.11 3.33 ab 3.71 ab
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 3.78 3.89 ab 3.88 ab
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 4.11 3.56 ab 3.12 b
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.89 3.22 ab 3.76 ab
TR23 x Pelita 4.33 4.00 ab 4.00 ab
TR23 x TR25U (1) 4.44 4.78 a 4.47 a
TR25H 3.89 3.89 ab 3.71 ab
TR25U x Ayesha (1) 4.22 3.44 ab 4.06 ab
TR25U x Ayesha (2) 4 3.22 ab 3.53 ab
TR25 x Pelita 4.33 4.33 ab 4.18 a
TR3 3.22 3.33 ab 3.76 ab
TR3 x Ayesha 4.22 3. 67 ab 3.71 ab
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column
show no significant difference at the 5% level.
The preference assessment based on age range is divided into three parts, namely range I (20-35
years), range II (36-50 years), and range III (> 50 years). Based on table 5 in the leaf color character,
5
range I do not have a significantly different mean. Based on range II, the genotype TR23 x TR25U (1)
which has green leaf color on a scale of 5, has the highest average value of leaf color characters with a
value of 4.78. While in range III, the genotype TR 23 x TR 25U (1) also has the highest average value
of leaf color characters with leaf color values of 4.47, which are not significantly different from Pelita
x TR3, which has green leaves on a scale of 5 with a value of 4.41 and TR25 x Pelita which green leaf
scale 5 with a value of 4.18.
Table 6. Consumer preferences (I) on the character of
habitus based on the age range
Pelita x TR3 3.82 ab 4.62 a 3.80 abc
Pelita 3.56 ab 3.22 b 3.48 bcdef
TR23 3.89 ab 3.22 b 3.48 bcdef
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 4.11 a 4.11 ab 3.80 abc
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 3.73 ab 3.33 b 2.95 f
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.56 ab 3.10 b 3.22 def
TR23 x Pelita 4.23 a 3.73 ab 3.78 abcd
TR23 x TR25U (1) 4.08 ab 4.15 ab 4.12 a
TR25H 3.67 ab 3.27 b 3.25 cdef
TR25U x Ayesha (1) 4.18 a 3.73 ab 3.70 abcde
TR25U x Ayesha (2) 3.56 ab 3.56 ab 3.15 ef
TR25 x Pelita 4.36 a 3.82 ab 3.70 abcde
TR3 3.05 b 3.09 b 3.36 cdef
TR3 x Ayesha 3.82 ab 3.45 b 4.05 ab
The results of the evaluation on the character of habitus (Table 6), the highest average value in the
range I is owned by the genotype TR25 x Pelita with an upright habitus with a value of 4.36, TR23 x
Pelita with an upright habitus with a value of 4.23, TR 25U x Ayesha (1) which is compact with a value
of 4.18, and TR 23B x Ayesha (1) with a compact habitus with a value of 4.11. Based on range II, the
genotype of Pelita x TR3, with a compact habitus is the most preferred genotype with a value of 4.62.
Whereas in range III, the genotype TR23 x TR25U (1) which has a compact habitus has the highest
average value with a value of 4.12. So it can be seen that the three age ranges have different habitus
tastes.
Table 7. Consumer preferences (I) on the character of fruit
color based on the age range
Pelita x TR3 3.30 ef 4.84 a 3.99 b
Pelita 3.56 de 4.11 b 3.68 d
TR23 4.22 ab 3.56 cd 3.71 d
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 3.56 de 4.11 b 4.21 a
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 4.13 abc 3.33 de 3.71 d
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.67 cde 3.01 e 3.03 e
TR23 x Pelita 4.49 a 3.91 bc 3.98 bc
TR23 x TR25U (1) 4.46 a 4.92 a 4.15 a
TR25H 3.67 cde 3.09 de 3.03 e
TR25U x Ayesha
3.87 bcd 4.09 b 3.82 cd
(1)
TR25U x Ayesha
3.78 bcde 4.22 b 3.13 e
(2)
TR25 x Pelita 4.09 abcd 4.00 bc 3.96 bc
TR3 3.01 f 3.22 de 3.14 e
TR3 x Ayesha 4.04 abcd 3.33 de 3.78 d
6
Based on the fruit color assessment in table 7, in the range of I genotypes, the most preferred are TR
23 x Pelita (dark purple-red) with a value of 4.49 and TR 23 x TR 25U (1) (green-red and purple-red)
with a value of 4.46. Based on range II, the genotype TR 23 x TR 25U (1) (green-red and purple-red)
has the highest average value with a value of 4.92. However, it is not significantly different from the
genotype Pelita x TR3 (purple-red and green-red) with values of 4.84. Whereas in range III, the genotype
TR23 x TR25U (1) (green-red and purple-red) and TR23B x Ayesha (1) (green-red and purple-orange,
red) are the preferred competitors with each value of 4.15 and 4.21. So, all three age ranges prefer plants
with more than one change in fruit color.
Based on table 8 on preferences for the scent characters, the most preferred range I is the genotype
TR23B x Ayesha (4) with a value of 4.00, TR23 x Pelita with a value of 4.00, TR25 x Pelita with a value
of 4.00, and TR3 x Ayesha with a value of 3.98. Based on range II, the highest average values are owned
by the genotype Pelita x TR3 with a value of 4.62 and the TR23 x Pelita genotype with a value of 3.98.
While in range III, the genotype TR 23 x TR 25U (1) had the highest average value of 3.64. The result
of preference assessment based on age range shows that range I (20-35 years) has the highest average
value, which is the most diverse compared to the other ranges.
Tabel 8. Consumer preferences (I) on the character of the
scent based on the age range
Pelita x TR3 3.03 g 3.85 b 3.32 ab
Pelita 3.11 f 3.22 d 3.30 ab
TR23 3.33 d 3.22 d 3.00 b
TR23B x Ayesha (1) 3.33 d 3.33 c 3.28 ab
TR23B x Ayesha (4) 4.00 a 3.22 d 2.95 b
TR23B x TR23A (2) 3.22 e 3.00 f 3.12 ab
TR23 x Pelita 4.00 a 3.98 a 3.33 ab
TR23 x TR25U (1) 3.51 c 3.01 f 3.64 a
TR25H 3.78 b 3.00 f 3.08 ab
TR25U x Ayesha (1) 3.00 g 3.02 ef 3.33 ab
TR25U x Ayesha (2) 3.33 d 3.33 c 3.12 ab
TR25 x Pelita 4.00 a 3.02 ef 3.04 ab
TR3 3.00 g 3.01 f 3.24 ab
TR3 x Ayesha 3.98 a 3.08 e 2.84 b
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show
no significant difference at the 5% level.
Table 9. Consumer preference test results (II)
Leaf Fruit
Genotype Habitus The Scent
Color Color
TR19 x Ayesha 3.44 b 3.24 b 2.72 b 3.00 c
TR23B x Ayesha (3) 4.32 a 3.92 a 4.60 a 3.40 ab
TR25U 4.24 a 3.96 a 4.60 a 3.56 a
TR25 x Ayesha (2) 4.40 a 3.84 a 4.44 a 3.16 bc
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant
difference at the 5% level.
Consumer preference assessment (II) was tested by 25 people consisting of students, private
employees, freelancers, self-employed individuals, homemakers, and retirees who are of the sex are 28%
male, and 72% female with ages 19 - 80 years. It can be seen through Table 9, the results of tests on
consumer preferences (II) show that there is no difference in the average value of consumer preferences
in the genotype TR 23B x Ayesha (3), TR 25U, and TR 25 x Ayesha (2) in the leaf color character,
habitus, and the color of the fruit. Based on leaf color observation, the TR 23B x Ayesha (3) and TR
25U genotypes have a purple and green stripe of color on a scale of 5, while the TR 25 x Ayesha (2)
7
genotype has green color on a scale of 5. Based on habitus observation, genotype TR 23B x Ayesha (3)
has a ducking habitus, TR 25U has a compact habitus, and TR 25 x Ayesha (2) has an upright habitus.
The results of observations on the fruit color character, genotype TR23B x Ayesha (3) has a purple-red
color, TR 25U has a deep purple-red color, and TR25 x Ayesha (2) has a deep purple-red color. Based
on the scent character, TR 25U is the most preferred genotype of consumers with an average value of
3.56. The genotype TR 19 x Ayesha was the genotype that most consumers disliked in this test, on all
characters. The genotype TR 19 x Ayesha has a green leaf color on a scale of 4, a green-red fruit color,
and an upright habitus.
Table 10 shows that only the scent character of male consumers and leaf color character of female
consumers did not show significant differences. The genotype TR19 x Ayesha is the genotype with the
lowest average value on each observation character based on male and female consumers. Leaf color
characters in male consumers have the highest value that is not significantly different between all
genotypes other than TR 19 x Ayesha genotypes. Whereas for female consumers, leaf color characters
did not show significant differences. The highest average value of habitus character in male consumers
is genotype TR 25 x Ayesha (2) which is upright habitus with a value of 4.22 and TR25U, which is a
compact habitus with a value of 4.00. Whereas for female consumers, habitus character has the highest
value, which is not significantly different between all genotypes except genotype TR 19 x Ayesha.
Based on the fruit color character in male consumers, all genotypes have values that are not
significantly different except the genotype TR 19 x Ayesha. The highest value of fruit color characters
based on female consumers is TR23B x Ayesha (3), a purple-red color with a value of 5.00 and TR25U,
with a deep purple-red color with a value of 4.98. The scent character value in male consumers did not
show significant differences. In contrast, the scent value of the most preferred characteristics of female
consumers was the genotype TR25U with a value of 3.83. Generally, it can be seen in table 10 that male
and female consumers do not like the genotype TR19 x Ayesha and most like the TR23B x Ayesha (3)
and TR25U genotypes in each observation character.
Table 10. Consumer preference test results (II) based on gender
Male Female
Genotype Leaf Fruit The Leaf Fruit The
Habitus Habitus
color color Scent color color scent
TR19 x Ayesha 2.86 b 2.86 b 2.71 b 2.86 3.67 3.64 b 2.97 c 3.06 c
TR23B x A (3) 3.86 a 3.57 ab 4.43 a 3.14 4.5 4.12 a 5.00 a 3.50 ab
TR25U 3.86 a 4.00 a 4.57 a 2.86 4.39 3.98 a 4.98 a 3.83 a
TR25 x A (2) 4.29 a 4.22 a 4.81 a 3.29 4.44 3.93 a 4.83 b 3.11 bc
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show no significant difference at the 5%
level
Based on Table 11, leaf color characters in the range I have mean values that are not significantly
different except TR 19 x Ayesha which has the lowest value. Range II and range III do not have
significant differences between all genotypes in leaf color characters. This shows that the leaf color
characteristics of all genotypes tested on consumer preference II are favored by all consumers of various
age ranges.
Table 11. Consumer preferences (II) in leaf color characters
based on the age range
TR19 x Ayesha 2.55 b 3.75 4.3
TR23B x Ayesha (3) 4.18 a 4.75 4.3
TR25U 4.18 a 4.25 4.3
TR25 x Ayesha (2) 4.09 a 4.75 4.6
8
Based on Table 12 in the assessment of habitus characters, in range I, all genotypes have a mean
value that is not significantly different except TR 19 x Ayesha with the lowest value. The genotype TR
23B x Ayesha (3), with a ducking habitus, has the highest average value in the habitus character in range
II with a value of 4.67. At the same time, there is no significant difference in all genotypes in range III.
Tabel 12. Consumer preferences (II) on the character of
habitus based on the age range
TR19 x Ayesha 2.82 b 3.50 b 3.87
TR23B x Ayesha (3) 3.64 a 4.67 a 4
TR25U 4.00 a 3.75 b 4
TR25 x Ayesha (2) 3.84 a 4.00 ab 3.9
Based on the assessment of fruit color characters in Table 13, the highest value in fruit color
characters in range I is the genotype TR23B x Ayesha (3), which is purple-red and The genotype TR
25U, which is dark purple-red with values of 4.45 and 4.55, respectively. TR23B x Ayesha genotype
(3) had the highest fruit color value in range II of 5.00. In contrast, in range III there were no significant
differences except TR 19 x Ayesha genotype with the lowest value.
Table 13. Consumer preferences (II) on the character of fruit color
TR19 x Ayesha 2.27 c 3.50 b 3.00 b
TR23B x Ayesha (3) 4.45 a 5.00 a 4.98 a
TR25U 4.55 a 4.25 ab 5.00 a
TR25 x Ayesha (2) 4.03 b 4.25 ab 5.00 a
Table 14 shows that based on the consumer preferences for scent characters, the genotype TR25U is
the most preferred in all observed age ranges. Whereas the genotype TR 19 x Ayesha is the genotype
with the most undesirable scent character in all observed age ranges, so the observation of scent
characters can be concluded that all age ranges like the same genotype.
Table 14. Consumer preferences (II) on the character of the scent
TR19 x Ayesha 2.82 d 3.00 c 3.00 c
TR23B x Ayesha (3) 3.27 b 3.00 c 4.00 b
TR25U 3.55 a 3.50 a 4.00 a
TR25 x Ayesha (2) 3.00 c 3.25 b 3.00 c
Note: Values followed by the same letter in the same column show no
significant difference at the 5% level.
4. Conclusion
Consumer preference test results (I) on 14 genotypes show that the average consumer most likes the
genotype TR 23 x TR 25 U (1) in some of the characters tested, namely the character of leaf color,
habitus, and fruit color with an average value of sequential 4.54, 4.09, and 4.34. Genotype TR 23 x
TR25U (1) has a dark green leaf color character with a scale of 5 based on the IRRI Leaf Color Chart,
a compact habitus, and has two color changes in the fruit, green-red and purple-red. Based on the results
9
of the consumer preference test (II) on 4 genotypes, it shows that there is no difference in the average
value of consumer preferences in the genotypes TR 23B x Ayesha (3), TR 25U, and TR 25 x Ayesha
(2) in the characters tested. Whereas the genotype TR19 x Ayesha became the genotype with the lowest
average value in all characters tested.
References
[1] Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan (BPPP) 2019 Analisis Perkembangan Harga Bahan
Pangan Pokok di Pasar Domestik dan Internasional htpp://www.bppp. kemendag. go. id. 05
Januari 2020
[2] Bosland PW and Votava EJ. 2000. Peppers: Vegetable and Spice Capsicums. New York (USA):
Cabi Publishing
[3] Rafiani U. 2016. Pendugaan Nilai Genetik dan Seleksi Karakter Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif Dua
Populasi Cabai Hias. Skripsi. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
[4] Adiyoga W and Nurmalinda 2012 Analisis Konjoin Preferensi Konsumen terhadap Atribut
Produk Kentang, Bawang Merah, dan Cabai Merah J. Horti 22(3):292-302
[5] Supranto J. 2003. Metode Penelitian Hukum Statistik. PT. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
[6] Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP). 2020. Profil Ibu Kota.
htpp://www.bpkp.go.id. 10 Mei 2020
[7] Alvida D 2016 Karakterisasi Morfologi, Pertumbuhan, dan Kualitas Galur-Galur Cabai Hias
(Capsicum annuum L.) IPB Skripsi Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor
[8] Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG). 2020. Akses Data Cuaca Kota Jakarta.
htpp://dataonline.bmkg.go.id. 10 Mei 2020
[9] Meilin A. 2014. Hama dan Penyakit pada Tanaman Cabai serta Pengendaliannya. Jambi: Balai
Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Jambi
[10] Purwantoro A and Jamhari. 2017. Uji Prefrensi Konsumen Terhadap karakter Bunga Kembang
Kertas (Zinnia elegans Jacq.). Jurnal Agroista 1(1) : 20-31
10

Alfauzaan 2021 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 694 012009

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Alfauzaan 2021 IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 694 012009

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS

Consumer preference for some genotypes of ornamental chili (Capsicum

View the article online for updates and enhancements.

This content was downloaded from IP address 180.244.233.241 on 16/03/2021 at 07:05

Consumer preference for some genotypes of ornamental chili

DF Alfauzaan1 and Warid2*

2. Materials and methods

3. Results and discussions

3.1. The General condition of the Experiment

3.2. Consumer preference

Table 3. Consumer Preference Test Results (I)

Table 4. Consumer preference test results (I) based on gender

Table 5. Consumer preferences (I) in leaf color

Genotype Range I Range II Range III

You might also like