SIRE 2.0 To VIQ7 - Comparative Analysis - Version 1.0 (January 2022)

Interelationship between SIRE 2.
0 and VIQ7 questions
To find the SIRE 2.0 question(s) that relate to a VIQ7 question:
1) Select the filter on the VIQ7 Questions column
2) Click on "Select All" to remove this selection
3) Type in the VIQ7 question number in the Search Box
4) Select the question you are interested in and press OK
To search for another question, Select "Clear Filter from VIQ7 Questions" and repeat the above, or
To find the VIQ7 question(s) that relate to a SIRE 2.0 question:
1) Select the filter on the SIRE 2.0 column and follow the instruction above
SIRE 2.0 questions
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
2.8.1 Was the OCIMF Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) available through the OCIMF SIRE Programme
completed accurately to reflect the structure, outfitting, management and certification of the vessel?
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
1.1.1 Autopopulated
2.8.2 Were records of the most recent Port State Control inspection available onboard, and where deficiencies had been r
these been corrected and closed out in accordance with the company procedure for defects or non-conformities?
2.8.2 Were records of the most recent Port State Control inspection available onboard, and where deficiencies had been r
these been corrected and closed out in accordance with the company procedure for defects or non-conformities?
1.1.1 Autopopulated
2.1.1 Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the vessel’s statutory certi
to date, were all certificates and documents carried onboard up to date and was the vessel free of conditions of class or sig
memoranda?
1.1.1 Autopopulated
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
memoranda?
2.7.1 Was the relevant content of the SMS manuals easily accessible to all personnel on board in a working language(s) un
them?
3.1.2 Were procedures and instructions contained within the Safety Management System and signs posted around the ve
in the designated working language of the vessel or a language(s) understood by the crew and, were the Master, officers a
able to communicate verbally in the designated working language?
5.1.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the onboard emergency response plans, and were records available to de
that all mandatory and company defined emergency drills had been completed and documented as required by company
5.1.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s SOPEP or SMPEP, and had drills taken place to test the effecti
the onboard emergency response actions required by the Plan and company procedures?
5.1.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for enclosed space rescue, and had drills t
to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for a cargo vapour or liquid release, Includ
fire, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with com
procedures?
5.1.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for collision, and had drills taken place to
effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for grounding, and had drills taken place t
5.1.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for loss of propulsion, and had drills taken
test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.11 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for failure of electrical power, and had d
place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.5.1Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company enclosed space entry procedures, and was evidence
demonstrate that all enclosed space entries had been made in strict compliance with the procedures?
5.10.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had these
been complied with?
2.2.1 Had the vessel been attended by a company Superintendent at approximately six-monthly intervals and were report
demonstrate that a systematic vessel inspection had been completed during each attendance declared through the pre-in
questionnaire?
2.2.1 Had the vessel been attended by a company Superintendent at approximately six-monthly intervals and were report
demonstrate that a systematic vessel inspection had been completed during each attendance declared through the pre-in
questionnaire?
2.2.2 Were recent ISM internal audit reports available on board, had corrective action been taken on board to close-out an
conformities and had this corrective action been verified by shore management?
2.2.3 Was the Master fully conversant with the company’s Safety Management System and had Master’s Reviews of the sy
place in accordance with the ISM Code and company procedures?
memoranda?
2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment Program (CAP)?
2.3.3 Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company cargo, ballast & void* space inspection and reporting
and, were records available to demonstrate that all inspections had been accomplished within the required time frame wi
completed in accordance with company instructions?
6.1.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Part II, and d
entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part II accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented
Annex I?
6.1.3 Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Pa
the entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part I accurately record the machinery space operations required to be docum
MARPOL Annex I?
Annex I?
2.6.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the VOC Management Plan, and had the procedures for minimising VOC
out in the Plan been implemented and documented as required?
2.6.1 Were the Master, deck officers and engineer officers familiar with the vessel’s Ballast Water Management Plan and w
available to demonstrate that ballast handling had been conducted in accordance with the plan?
2.6.3 Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the contents and requirements of the Ship Energy Efficiency Mana
(SEEMP) and had these been fully implemented?
2.3.1 Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Enhanced Survey File in a
with Classification Society rules, and was the vessel free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the struc
condition of the hull or cargo and ballast tank coatings?
2.3.2 Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Class Survey File, and was
free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the structural condition of the hull or hold space and ballast
coatings?
2.3.4 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting leakage of liquids between c
ballast, void and cofferdam spaces, which included inspecting the surface of ballast water prior to discharge and, were rec
available to show that the necessary checks had been performed?
3.1.3 Did the complement of officers and ratings onboard at the time of inspection meet or exceed the requirements of th
Safe Manning Document and the declared company standard manning for routine operations, and had senior officers been
ensure continuity of operational knowledge?
3.4.1 Was there an effective system in place to record and monitor the hours of rest for all personnel onboard in complian
STCW, MLC or the regulatory requirements applicable to the vessel?
3.1.2 Were procedures and instructions contained within the Safety Management System and signs posted around the ve
in the designated working language of the vessel or a language(s) understood by the crew and, were the Master, officers a
able to communicate verbally in the designated working language?
3.3.2 Had the Master received formal ship handling training prior to promotion or when being assigned to a new type of s
significantly different handling characteristics to ships in which they had recently served?
3.1.1 Were the officers and ratings suitably qualified to serve onboard the vessel and did the officer matrix posted on the
website accurately reflect the qualifications, experience and English Language capabilities of the officers onboard at the tim
inspection?
inspection?
3.5.1 Had the company developed an effective familiarisation programme that covered the personal safety and profession
responsibilities of all onboard personnel, including visitors and contractors, and were records available to demonstrate tha
familiarisation had been completed as required?
3.5.3 Had the Master and navigation officers been familiarised with the ECDIS equipment installed on board and were doc
records of this familiarisation available?
3.4.2 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the company policy and procedures for drug and alcohol abuse pre
had unannounced drug and alcohol testing taken place onboard in accordance with the policy?
2.4.1 Were the senior officers familiar with the company procedure for reporting defects to vessel structure, machinery an
equipment to shore-based management through the company defect reporting system and was evidence available to dem
that all defects had been reported accordingly?
2.7.1 Was the relevant content of the SMS manuals easily accessible to all personnel on board in a working language(s) un
them?
2.7.2 Did the SMS identify clear levels of authority and lines of communication between the Master, ship's officers, ratings
company, and were all onboard personnel familiar with these arrangements as they related to their position?
4.1.1 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the set up and operation of the E
fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that the ECDIS had been operated in accordance with comp
procedures at all stages of a voyage?
4.1.4 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for using the Automatic Identificatio
(AIS) fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic checks and tests had been carried out in accor
the procedures?
4.1.5 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the use of the Bridge Navigational
Alarm System (BNWAS) and were records available to demonstrate that it had been operated and tested in accordance wi
procedure?
4.1.10 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for managing Marine Safety Informa
broadcasts by NAVTEX and SafetyNET and were warnings affecting the vessel’s route plotted on the voyage charts?
4.1.11 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for preserving data from the VDR S-V
were records available to demonstrate that tests of the equipment had been completed as required?
4.2.1 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company passage planning procedures and had all voyage
appraised, planned, executed and monitored in accordance with company procedures, industry best practice and both loc
international rules?
4.2.3 Had the Master prepared Master's Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforce
company expectations with regards to navigational requirements including restricted visibility, CPA/BCR and minimum pas
from navigational dangers and navigational aids and, if so, had all navigation officers signed to acknowledge their understa
same?
4.2.7 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the carriage and management of n
publications and was evidence available to demonstrate that publications had been managed in accordance with the proce
4.3.4 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures to prevent disruption and distraction
bridge, and were these procedures being complied with?
2.4.2 Where defects existed to the vessel’s structure, machinery or equipment, had the vessel operator notified class, flag
authorities in the port of arrival, as appropriate to the circumstances, and had short term certificates, waivers, exemptions
permissions to proceed the voyage been issued where necessary?
4.2.6 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the navigational equipme
propulsion, steering gear and thrusters prior to use and prior to critical phases of a passage or operation and, did checklist
entries confirm the required tests had been completed as required?
4.3.3 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for integrating a pilot (or similar role
bridge team and were records available to demonstrate that the process had been followed?
4.3.1 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures defining the minimum bridge team c
and engine room operating mode and were records available to demonstrate that recent voyages had been planned and e
accordance with company expectations?
4.2.2 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company under keel clearance (UKC) policy and procedure
records available to demonstrate that the required calculations had been completed at the appropriate points during each
the vessel had remained in compliance with the UKC policy?
4.1.6 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures governing the management and ope
Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS) receivers fitted onboard and was the fitted equipment configured, used and chec
accordance with the procedure?
4.1.15 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the sound
equipment fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic tests had been completed and the equip
in accordance with company expectations?
4.1.9 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the naviga
and shapes, and was there evidence that the navigation lights had been tested to confirm full functionality and correct visi
4.1.12 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the magnetic and gyro c
carried onboard, and were records available to demonstrate their accuracy and reliability?
4.1.14 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for testing and using the daylight sig
lamp?
the procedures?
4.1.13 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation and testing of the
transceivers fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests and checks had been comp
4.1.2 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for managing and operating the rada
fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that the units had been operated and tested in accordance
company procedures?
company procedures?
4.1.7 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and managing the echo
and were records maintained to demonstrate that the equipment fitted to the vessel had been tested and operated in acc
the company expectations?
distance measuring devices fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests had been co
required by the procedures?
company procedures?
company procedures?
4.1.6 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures governing the management and ope
Global Navigation Satellite System(GNSS) receivers fitted onboard and was the fitted equipment configured, used and chec
4.1.14 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for testing and using the daylight sig
lamp?
4.1.5 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the use of the Bridge Navigational
Alarm System (BNWAS) and were records available to demonstrate that it had been operated and tested in accordance wi
procedure?
company procedures?
company procedures?
the procedures?
company procedures?
company procedures?
company procedures?
company procedures?
10.4.1 Were the responsible vessel staff familiar with the company procedure for managing and using the planned mainte
system, and was the system updated with an accurate record of onboard maintenance and spare parts in accordance with
procedure?
4.1.3 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and testing the steerin
systems fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that operation and testing had been carried out in
with the procedures?
4.2.4 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company electronic chart management procedures and w
ENCs and RNCs managed, corrected and used appropriately?
4.2.5 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company paper chart management procedures and were
paper charts managed, corrected and used appropriately?
4.2.7 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the carriage and management of n
publications and was evidence available to demonstrate that publications had been managed in accordance with the proce
4.2.5 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company paper chart management procedures and were
paper charts managed, corrected and used appropriately?
4.4.4 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the procedures for sending and receiving distress, urgency and
messages and were suitable instructions posted by the GMDSS equipment?
4.4.5 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the operation, testing and maintenance of the GMDSS VHF, M
radio and satellite communications equipment and were records available to demonstrate the equipment was in good ord
4.4.6 Were the Master, officers and crew aware of the potential danger of using radio or mobile telephone equipment du
and ballast handling operations and was there a sufficient number of intrinsically safe portable radios for use in operationa
7.3.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with regional maritime security reporting requirements and operation of the s
alert system (SSAS) and had this equipment been regularly tested?
4.4.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB)
EPIRB in good order with records available to demonstrate that had it been inspected, tested and maintained as required?
4.4.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the survival craft portable two-wa
and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they been inspected and tested as required?
4.4.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB)
EPIRB in good order with records available to demonstrate that had it been inspected, tested and maintained as required?
4.4.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the Search and Rescue Transmitters (SARTs), and were t
good order with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected and tested as required?
4.4.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the survival craft portable two-wa
and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they been inspected and tested as required?
5.5.3 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for working at height, and was there evid
risk control measures such as permits to work or documented risk assessments were consistently used whenever work wa
at height?
5.7.6 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for risk assessment, as appropriate to th
and was there evidence of the development and review of risk assessments in accordance with the procedures?
5.5.3 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for working at height, and was there evid
risk control measures such as permits to work or documented risk assessments were consistently used whenever work wa
at height?
5.5.4 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for working over the side, and was ther
that risk control measures such as standard work procedures, permits to work or documented risk assessments were cons
whenever work was undertaken over the side?
5.5.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for working on electrical equipment and system
there evidence that risk control measures such as permits to work and/or documented risk assessments were consistently
whenever work was undertaken on electrical equipment and systems?
5.5.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the control of hazardous energy, and was ev
available, through documented risk assessment or permits, that hazardous energy sources were routinely identified and is
before working on, or in, machinery, systems or spaces where hazardous energy could be present?
5.7.6 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for risk assessment, as appropriate to th
and was there evidence of the development and review of risk assessments in accordance with the procedures?
5.1.12 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for steering gear failure, and had drills ta
test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures.
5.2.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed carbon dioxide fi
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with the release pro
operating instructions displayed at the control stations?
5.2.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s machinery space fixed
expansion foam fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order, available for immediate use, and
operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations?
water-spraying fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, w
5.2.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire pumps, fire main,
isolating valves and fire hydrants, and was the system and its components in good working order and available for immedi
5.2.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the machinery space fixed water-
equivalent local application fire-fighting system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for im
use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations?
5.2.15 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s deck foam system, inc
portable applicators, and was the system in good working order and available for immediate use, with operating instructio
at the control station?
5.3.1 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and use of the vessel’s firefighter’s outfits including t
contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and was the equipment maintained in good condition and ready for immediate use
accordance with company procedures?
5.7.4 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company work planning procedures and were records availab
demonstrate that onboard work planning meetings had been conducted and documented in accordance with the procedu
5.7.3 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for holding and documenting shipboard
meetings and was evidence available that safety concerns raised at the meetings were acknowledged and addressed by sh
management?
5.7.1. Had all onboard incidents been reported and investigated in accordance with company procedures, and was an incid
investigation report or a summarised lessons learned bulletin available for each incident at or above a defined threshold?
5.7.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company incident and near-miss reporting procedure and wa
available to demonstrate that incidents and near-misses had been investigated and closed out in accordance with the com
procedure?
8.99.2 Were the Master and all officers with a direct responsibility for cargo, tank cleaning or ballast operations familiar wi
requirements of the ISGOTT Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL) and, were appropriate sections of the SSSCL in use with al
provisions and agreements maintained throughout?
5.8.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the main deck areas, and
inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment?
5.8.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the forecastle, and had
been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment?
5.1.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for the principal fire scenarios for the ves
had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the plans in accordance with the company procedures?
5.1.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for enclosed space rescue, and had drills t
to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
procedures?
5.1.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for collision, and had drills taken place to
5.1.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for grounding, and had drills taken place t
5.1.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for loss of propulsion, and had drills take
test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.11 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for failure of electrical power, and had d
place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for emergency towing, including the Eme
Towing Booklet (ETB), and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in acc
with company procedures?
5.1.16 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for flooding, and had drills taken place t
effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures?
5.1.17 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans regarding LNG bunker operations, and h
taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures?
5.10.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had these
been complied with?
5.1.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for the principal fire scenarios for the ves
had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the plans in accordance with the company procedures?
5.1.6 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the procedure for launching the lifeboat(s), and had abandon shi
place in accordance with company procedures and the requirements of SOLAS and the Flag Administration?
10.3.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and regular testin
watertight doors, and were the watertight doors in satisfactory condition?
3.5.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the ship’s lifesaving and fire extinguishing appliances and, had on
onboard training and instruction taken place to maintain familiarity?
5.1.15 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for recovery of persons
water, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with co
procedures?
5.8.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the procedure for safety inspections of the cargo machinery rooms, and h
5.4.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the periodic testing and maintenance of the
lighting system, was there evidence of periodic testing, and was the system in proper operating condition?
5.8.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the ballast and/or bunke
pumproom, and had inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment?
5.8.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the cargo pumproom, a
5.6.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing, maintenance and calibration of the vesse
and personal gas measurement instruments, and was the equipment on board sufficient, in good working order, regularly
periodically calibrated?
5.6.2 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the atmosphere in double-hull
bottom spaces for flammable gas, and were records available to confirm that appropriate measurements had been taken u
equipment fitted to, or provided on, the vessel?
5.6.2 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the atmosphere in double-hull
bottom spaces for flammable gas, and were records available to confirm that appropriate measurements had been taken u
equipment fitted to, or provided on, the vessel?
5.6.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing, maintenance and calibration of the vesse
and personal gas measurement instruments, and was the equipment on board sufficient, in good working order, regularly
periodically calibrated?
5.5.2 Were the Master, officers and, where directly involved, ratings familiar with the company hot work procedure, and w
available to demonstrate that hot work had been conducted in accordance with the procedure?
10.3.8 Were engineer officers and ratings familiar with the safety precautions for the use of electric welding equipment, w
safety precautions posted, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
10.3.7 Was gas welding and cutting equipment in good order, and spare oxygen and acetylene cylinders stored apart in a
ventilated location outside of the accommodation and engine room?
5.4.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the davit-launched lifeboats, release mechanisms and la
appliances, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested a
5.4.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and its launchin
and was the equipment in satisfactory condition with records available to demonstrate that it had been inspected and test
5.4.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the dedicated rescue boat and launching appliance, and
good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as required?
5.4.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the liferafts, hydrostatic releases and liferaft launching a
where provided, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been serviced, inspecte
as required?
5.4.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the periodic testing and maintenance of the
lighting system, was there evidence of periodic testing, and was the system in proper operating condition?
5.1.14 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for man overboard, inc
launching and recovering the rescue boat, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency
plan in accordance with company procedures?
5.4.4 Were the Master and Officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the rocket parachute flares and li
appliances and were they in good order, with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected as requir
5.4.6 Were the lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke floats and lifelines, in good order, clearly marked and correctly distr
around the ship?
5.4.8 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the lifejackets and personal flotation devices (PFDs) provided on
was the equipment in good condition, and properly maintained?
5.4.7 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the immersion suits, and were the immersion suits in good order
accessible and their location(s) clearly indicated?
3.5.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the ship’s lifesaving and fire extinguishing appliances and, had on
onboard training and instruction taken place to maintain familiarity?
5.2.2 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire dam
means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation systems and the means of stopping the power ventilation sys
outside the space served?
5.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed fire detection an
system, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
5.2.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed carbon dioxide fi
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with the release pro
operating instructions displayed at the control stations?
expansion foam fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order, available for immediate use, and
water-spraying fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, w
5.2.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the machinery space fixed water-
equivalent local application fire-fighting system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for im
use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations?
5.2.16 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire do
5.3.5 Were the Master, officers and engine ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s wheeled (mobil
extinguishers, and was the equipment in good order and available for immediate use with operating instructions clearly m
10.7.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s remote cont
and lube oil valves, emergency fuel and lube oil pump shut-offs and oil tank quick closing valves, and were the systems in g
order?
5.3.2 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire hoses, nozz
international shore connection, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use?
5.3.2 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire hoses, nozz
international shore connection, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use?
5.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed fire detection an
system, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
5.2.12 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire-extinguishing syste
vessel’s paint locker and any other flammable liquid locker, and was the system in good working order and available for im
use?
5.2.1 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency fire pump, and were re
available to demonstrate that the emergency fire pump and its location had been maintained and tested in accordance wi
procedures?
5.3.3 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s portable fire e
and, were the extinguishers in good order and readily available for immediate use with operating instructions clearly mark
5.3.4 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and purpose of the Emergency Escape Breathing Dev
carried on board, and were these devices in good order, suitably located and ready for immediate use?
5.7.7 Were Safety Data Sheets (SDS) available on board for all cargo, bunkers, chemicals, paints and other products being
were crew members familiar with their use?
5.4.6 Were the lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke floats and lifelines, in good order, clearly marked and correctly dist
around the ship?
5.10.1 Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the pilot boardin
arrangements, and was the equipment provided in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with industry best practi
5.10.2 Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the accommodati
and were the accommodation ladders in good order and used in accordance with the company procedure and manufactur
instructions?
5.10.3 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for providing safe access to the vessel w
alongside a terminal/berth, and was safe access provided by the ship’s portable gangway, the vessel’s accommodation lad
shore gangway?
5.10.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company personnel transfer by crane procedure, and where a perso
transfer basket (PTB) and accessories were provided, were these in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with com
procedures and manufacturer’s recommendations?
5.11.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the management of samples of bun
and Annex I and/or Annex II cargoes as applicable, and were samples being properly stored and eventually disposed of?
2.7.2 Did the SMS identify clear levels of authority and lines of communication between the Master, ship's officers, ratings
company, and were all onboard personnel familiar with these arrangements as they related to their position?
6.4.1 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for the removal of small quantities of o
spilled and contained on deck, and was suitable response equipment available, in satisfactory condition and effectively dep
6.2.2 Were cargo system overboard and sea suction valves checked and verified as closed and secured prior to commence
cargo transfer, and where provided, were sea valve-testing arrangements in order and regularly monitored for leakage?
2.3.4 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting leakage of liquids between c
ballast, void and cofferdam spaces, which included inspecting the surface of ballast water prior to discharge and, were rec
available to show that the necessary checks had been performed?
8.3.24 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections a
manifolds, and were the manifold arrangements in satisfactory condition?
6.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for inspections and pressure tests of the bunke
and MDO) pipeline system, and had the tests been performed and the results suitably recorded?
6.4.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the disposal of accumulations of water cont
with oil and/or marine pollutants in the forecastle and other internal spaces, and had the procedures been implemented?
10.2.5 Were the officers familiar with the company procedure for testing the bilge monitoring devices within their area of
responsibility, and were records available to demonstrate that the bilge monitoring devices and associated alarms had bee
accordance with the company procedure?
6.2.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the arrangements to drain the cargo pumproom bilges in the event of flo
accidental leakage, and were these arrangements in good order?
6.6.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil discharge monitoring and
system, and was the oil discharge monitoring and control system in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the
procedures, manufacturer’s instructions and MARPOL Annex I?
Annex I?
6.5.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the machinery space bilges in
flooding, and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order?
MARPOL Annex I?
MARPOL Annex I?
6.6.1 Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil filtering equipme
the oil filtering equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures, manufacturer’s
and MARPOL Annex I?
and MARPOL Annex I?
MARPOL Annex I?
and MARPOL Annex I?
6.1.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Garbage Record Book in acco
the Garbage Management Plan, and did the entries contained in the Garbage Record Book accurately record the garbage m
activities required to be documented by MARPOL Annex V?
6.3.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation of the ballast water mana
system (BWMS), and was the equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures an
manufacturer’s instructions?
6.3.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation of the ballast water mana
system (BWMS), and was the equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures an
manufacturer’s instructions?
5.1.5 Were the Master and Ship Security Officer (SSO) familiar with the vessel’s Ship Security Plan (SSP), and had drills take
test the effectiveness of the measures and procedures specified by the Ship Security Plan?
7.4.1 Did the Ship Security Officer (SSO) have a valid Certificate of Proficiency and a full understanding of their role, and w
security records of port calls being maintained as required by SOLAS?
5.1.5 Were the Master and Ship Security Officer (SSO) familiar with the vessel’s Ship Security Plan (SSP), and had drills take
test the effectiveness of the measures and procedures specified by the Ship Security Plan?
7.4.1 Did the Ship Security Officer (SSO) have a valid Certificate of Proficiency and a full understanding of their role, and w
security records of port calls being maintained as required by SOLAS?
7.1.1 Was security threat and risk assessment an integral part of voyage planning, and did the passage plan contain securi
information for each leg of the voyage?
7.2.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for hardening the vessel when entering areas o
security risk, and was there a Vessel Hardening Plan (VHP) available?
7.2.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures to control access to the vessel in port a
the safety of visitors, and were these procedures effectively implemented?
7.5.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for cyber security risk management, and had th
procedures been fully implemented?
8.3.14 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and main
the cargo tank venting systems, and were the systems in satisfactory condition?
8.6.4 Was a ship specific Cargo System Operation Manual provided on board and, were the Master and officers familiar w
content?
content?
8.99.9. Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for periodically verifying the accuracy of cargo
system controls and indicators, and were legible and up-to-date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams available at the cargo con
location(s) and in the pumproom(s) as applicable?
8.6.16 Were the Master and officers familiar with the filling limits (FL) and loading limits (LL) for the cargo tanks, and was t
information readily available in the cargo control room or position?
8.3.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and testing of cargo, vapour a
pipelines, and were records available for these activities?
8.3.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and testing of cargo, vapour a
pipelines, and were records available for these activities?
8.3.17 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold
spool pieces and other portable pipework, and were these items in satisfactory condition and properly fitted when in use?
8.99.6 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedure and manufacturer’s instructions for the pe
testing of the stability and loading instrument(s), and were records maintained to confirm that tests had been completed i
8.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the Procedures and Arrangements Manual,
Fitness for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular, and was this inf
readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning and operations?
8.3.11 Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for cargo tank washing afte
of volatile products in a non-inert atmosphere, and had these procedures been followed?
8.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the Procedures and Arrangements Manual,
Fitness for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular, and was this inf
readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning and operations?
8.99.1 Were the Master and all officers directly involved in cargo transfer operations familiar with the company procedure
planning cargo and ballast transfers, and were records available to demonstrate that cargo operations had been planned i
with the company procedure and conducted in accordance with the agreed plan?
8.99.11 Was there a procedure in place to complete an independent check of the entire cargo liquid, vapour and venting p
system prior to commencement of cargo operations to ensure that valves, vacuum breakers, sampling connections, drains
connections or interconnections were correctly set, and blanked or capped, where appropriate?
6.1.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Cargo Record Book, and did
contained in the Cargo Record Book accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by MARPO
6.1.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Cargo Record Book, and did
contained in the Cargo Record Book accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by MARPO
8.99.7 Where the vessel was subject to loading restrictions and/or intact stability concerns at any phase of a voyage or ca
operation, had the company developed procedures to manage these restrictions and/or concerns, and were the Master an
officers familiar with the company procedures?
8.2.4 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for planning and documenting cargo tank
operations after the carriage of volatile and/or toxic products, and had these procedures been followed?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - wide ranging question covered in various SIRE 2.0 questions
content?
5.2.14 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose of the cargo, ballast and stripping pump temperature sensi
and was there evidence that alarm activation points had been correctly set and tested in accordance with company proced
manufacturer's instructions?
8.6.21 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that gave guidance on cargo tank environmen
during inerting, gas freeing and gassing up operations, thermal load hazards during tank cool-down, and the minimum carg
temperature?
8.6.2 Were the Master, officers, and ratings involved with cargo operations, familiar with the functions of the vessel’s carg
Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and main
8.6.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out emergency discharge operatio
any required additional equipment in satisfactory condition?
temperature?
8.3.15 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring leakage into the cofferdams of
pumps, and had regular purging of the cofferdams taken place to identify any excessive leakage?
temperature?
8.3.8 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the cargo system Emergency Shutdown (ESD) system, where fitte
the cargo pump emergency stop controls, and was there evidence that the systems and equipment had been tested in acc
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - wide ranging question covered in various SIRE 2.0 questions
procedures?
8.99.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for checking and testing cargo and ballast syste
and were the valves and the remote control system in satisfactory condition?
8.2.5 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatib
during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed?
8.4.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatible ca
refrigerants during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed?
8.6.19 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the submerged motor ele
pumps and the testing of their associated safety devices and alarms, and had these procedures been followed?
temperature?
8.3.12 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of portable cargo ullage/temperatu
(UTI) measurement and sampling equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance wit
company procedures?
8.99.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, maintenance, testing, calibr
comparison of the fixed cargo tank level gauging system, and was the system in satisfactory condition and fully operationa
8.2.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes
these procedures been followed?
8.3.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the primary and secondar
venting systems in accordance with SOLAS, and were these systems correctly set?
8.3.23 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and calibration o
temperature monitoring equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
8.4.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes
these procedures been followed?
8.6.11 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection and maintenance of
vapour pipeline insulation and expansion arrangements, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition?
11.1.x Photograph comparison
8.3.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and setting of the
high-level and high-high-level alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set?
8.3.15 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring leakage into the cofferdams of
pumps, and had regular purging of the cofferdams taken place to identify any excessive leakage?
procedures?
8.3.21 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo heating, and was the cargo heating sy
satisfactory condition and tested and used in accordance with the company procedure?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - predominantly a commercial matter
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - predominantly a commercial matter
8.6.15 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of the
heaters, vaporisers and condensers, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
8.3.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, testing and operation of the
collection system, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition?
5.11.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the management of samples of bun
and Annex I and/or Annex II cargoes as applicable, and were samples being properly stored and eventually disposed of?
8.99.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the bo
arrangements for independent cargo tanks, process plant and cargo pipelines, and were these arrangements in satisfactor
8.1.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the isolation of individual cargo tanks from t
venting system in accordance with SOLAS, and were these procedures being followed?
8.3.8 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the cargo system Emergency Shutdown (ESD) system, where fitte
the cargo pump emergency stop controls, and was there evidence that the systems and equipment had been tested in acc
cargo tank high-level and overfill alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set?
8.6.20 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and s
liquid line, hold, insulation and inter-barrier space relief valves?
8.1.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the inert gas system, and had the
system been used in accordance with ISGOTT guidance, with cargo tanks maintained in an inert condition at all times, exce
was necessary to be gas-free for entry?
8.3.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration of the inert gas system fixed oxyg
and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and
procedures?
company procedures?
8.4.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out cargo sampling operations?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - no supporting industry references to this found
8.3.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the inert gas generator, and had th
been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures?
8.3.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the nitrogen generator inert gas sy
had the system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedur
8.3.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the flue gas inert gas system, and h
system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures?
8.3.16 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the non-return dev
in the inert gas system, and were these devices in satisfactory condition?
8.1.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the inert gas system, and had the
system been used in accordance with ISGOTT guidance, with cargo tanks maintained in an inert condition at all times, exce
was necessary to be gas-free for entry?
8.3.20 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the connections and interconnections to t
system for routine and emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition and clearly
to their purpose?
high-level and high-high-level alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set?
procedures?
8.3.19 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the indicators and alarms in the in
system, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructi
company procedures?
8.5.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, testing and calibration of the
transfer measurement system (CTMS), and was the system in satisfactory condition?
procedures?
8.3.21 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo heating, and was the cargo heating sy
satisfactory condition and tested and used in accordance with the company procedure?
8.3.18 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the pressure/vacuu
(P/V) device(s) installed in the inert gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition?
company procedures?
5.6.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the oxygen sensors and associated ala
the space, or spaces, containing the inert gas system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and
activation points set in accordance with company procedures and manufacturer's instructions?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - no supporting industry references to this found

8.2.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the inert gas system, and h
gas system been used in accordance with these procedures, industry guidance, and SOLAS and IBC regulations?
procedures?
8.3.25 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for receiving nitrogen from shore for ope
as inerting, purging or padding cargo tanks, or for clearing cargo lines?
8.1.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures and international regulations for the planning, p
conduct and documentation of crude oil washing operations (COW), and was the COW system in satisfactory condition and
accordance with the company procedures for each COW operation?
8.2.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the inert gas system, and h
gas system been used in accordance with these procedures, industry guidance, and SOLAS and IBC regulations?
8.3.20 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the connections and interconnections to t
system for routine and emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition and clearly
to their purpose?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - obsolete
5.6.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection sys
required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated?
procedures?
8.3.19 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the indicators and alarms in the in
system, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructi
company procedures?
procedures?
reliquefaction plant, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
8.5.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance and testing of t
arrangements for the LNG gas fuel supply system, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition?
8.3.18 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the pressure/vacuu
(P/V) device(s) installed in the inert gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition?
8.3.5 Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for dipping, ullaging and sam
flammable static accumulator cargoes in non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed?
8.3.6 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for loading flammable static accumulator c
non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed?
8.5.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, maintenance and
the Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)?
operations after the carriage of volatile products, and had these procedures been followed?
8.6.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring the integrity of the containment
maintaining the atmosphere in the interbarrier spaces and/or hold spaces in a safe condition, and had records been maint
9.6.1 Were the vapour collection system manifold arrangements suitable for hose handling at buoy moorings?
8.3.6 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for loading flammable static accumulator c
non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed?
8.4.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe carriage of propylene oxide (PO), et
(EO) and PO-EO mixtures?
8.6.18 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting water leakage into hold or insula
and for dealing with any water or liquid cargo that may have accumulated in these spaces?
8.4.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the carg
insulation, and was the insulation reported to be in good condition?
8.5.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for protecting the hull structure from low temp
exposure, and was temperature monitoring and cofferdam heating equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition?
5.6.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the cargo pump room fixed gas detecti
and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and alarm activation points set in accordance with compa
procedures and manufacturer's instructions?
8.6.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maint
the vessel’s inert gas system and its associated equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
8.6.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and se
cargo tank relief valves?
8.99.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the selection, inspection, testing and stora
transfer hoses, and were the hoses in satisfactory condition?
8.6.18 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting water leakage into hold or insula
and for dealing with any water or liquid cargo that may have accumulated in these spaces?
8.4.7 Were the vent outlets from the cargo containment system fitted with the correct protection screen or flame screen
the cargo being carried, and were the screens in satisfactory condition?
5.9.1 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company lifting and rigging procedures, and was evidence av
demonstrate that each item of lifting and rigging equipment had been maintained, inspected and tested in accordance wit
procedure?
5.9.2 Where the vessel was fitted with a single cargo hose handling crane, was a risk assessment available which identified
minimum spare parts that must be carried onboard to ensure continued operation in the event of a single component failu
were the identified spare parts available onboard?
9.5.3 Were the Master, officers and deck ratings familiar with the vessel’s STS Operations Plan?
the vent mast fire suppression system, and was the system in satisfactory condition?
9.5.2 Where the vessel was involved in an “at sea” STS operation, was an accurate Joint Plan of Operation available onboa
Master and deck officers familiar with its content, and were operations being conducted in accordance with its requiremen
content?
5.6.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the cargo pump room fixed gas detecti
and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and alarm activation points set in accordance with compa
procedures and manufacturer's instructions?
8.4.7 Were the vent outlets from the cargo containment system fitted with the correct protection screen or flame screen
the cargo being carried, and were the screens in satisfactory condition?
8.6.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the management and operation of the cargo
systems, and had these procedures been followed?
9.5.1 Were the appropriate industry checklists used during STS operations, and were comprehensive records of these ope
maintained?
8.2.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required b
Code, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition and suitable for the products being handled?
the vent mast fire suppression system, and was the system in satisfactory condition?
8.8.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for changing cargo modes, including ship-specifi
and were there records to show that these procedures had been followed?
8.2.7 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety equipment required by th
including SCBAs, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition ready for immediate use?
inspection?
the cargo hold hatch-covers, and were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition?
the cargo hold hatch-covers, and were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition?
8.2.6 Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IBC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitab
respiratory and eye protection?
8.6.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections at
2.3.3 Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company cargo, ballast & void* space inspection and reporting
and, were records available to demonstrate that all inspections had been accomplished within the required time frame wi
completed in accordance with company instructions?
5.12.1 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures that addressed the use of respiratory p
equipment during cargo operations, and did the procedures prohibit the use of filter type respirators for this purpose?
8.6.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the management and operation of the cargo
systems, and had these procedures been followed?
5.1.19 Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the spaces forward of the co
bulkhead in the event of flooding and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order?
5.12.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of the decontamination showers and
stations on deck, and were these facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use?
5.1.19 Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the spaces forward of the co
bulkhead in the event of flooding and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order?
procedure?
3.3.5 Did all key personnel onboard involved in Dynamically Positioned (DP) operations have appropriate training in accor
IMO and International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) guidelines and local regulations applicable to the area of op
8.6.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required
8.6.12 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety, rescue and recovery equ
including SCBAs, required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment ready for immediate use?
4.5.4 Was the vessel provided with a comprehensive DP operations manual and were the Master and officers familiar with
contents, including DP checklists, capability plots, consequence analysis and activity specific operating guidelines (ASOG)?
8.4.5 Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IGC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitab
respiratory and eye protection?
5.12.2 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of the decontamination showers and
stations on deck, and were these facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use?
5.2.11 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed dry chemical p
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for immediate use, with operati
instructions clearly displayed at the control stations?
5.10.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had the cre
received appropriate training?
5.2.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the water-spray system for coolin
prevention and crew protection on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and m
8.6.13 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required
8.7.8 Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s DP FMEA, was the latest version available on board, and wer
modifications to the DP system included?
5.2.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire extinguishing syste
within enclosed spaces containing cargo handling equipment, and was the equipment in good working order and available
immediate use, with the release procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations?
4.5.1 Was the latest Annual DP Trial report available on board, were the Master and officers familiar with the contents, an
taken part in onboard training and drills involving various DP scenarios?
5.2.11 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed dry chemical p
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for immediate use, with operati
instructions clearly displayed at the control stations?
procedure?
5.2.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the water-spray system for coolin
prevention and crew protection on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and m
5.2.10 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire extinguishing syste
within enclosed spaces containing cargo handling equipment, and was the equipment in good working order and available
immediate use, with the release procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations?
procedure?
4.5.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for reporting and recording DP events and incid
were all DP parameters being logged and recorded?
maintained?
maintained?
0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - information gathering only

4.5.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of Position Reference Systems (PRS)
the equipment in satisfactory condition with sensor offset data readily available to the DPO?
8.7.7 Are all items of DP equipment in satisfactory condition and are they included in the Planned Maintenance System (P
8.7.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures, including appropriate arrival checklists, detailin
necessary checks and actions to be carried out when approaching an offshore terminal prior to DP and/or bow loading ope
had these procedures been complied with?
4.5.5 Were up to date Field Operations Manuals on board for each offshore terminal to which the vessel trades, were the
officers familiar with their content, and were records available of the regular communication checks with terminal installati
required by Field Specific Operating Guidelines (FSOG)?
8.7.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the equipment for control and monitoring of the Bow Loading System (BL
the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
8.7.5 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the deluge system in the bow load
(BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
8.7.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s Emergency Shut Down (ESD) sy
was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
the Bow Loading System (BLS), including alarms and indicators, and was the BLS area well maintained and free from oil.
8.5.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for protecting the hull structure from low temp
exposure, and was temperature monitoring and cofferdam heating equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition?
8.7.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed foam fire extinguishing s
bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order and regularly inspected, tested and maintai
8.7.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the gas and fire detection systems
loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly tested, maintained and calibrated?
9.1.3 Were the Master, deck officers, and ratings involved with mooring operations, familiar with the content of the Line M
Plan and was the plan maintained in accordance with company instructions with mooring line, mooring tail and joining sha
certificates available for each item included within the Line Management Plan?
9.1.2 Was the vessel satisfactorily moored in accordance with both the terminal mooring plan and the mooring configurati
permitted by the vessel’s Mooring System Management Plan?
9.1.4 Did all mooring lines, mooring tails and joining shackles, including those carried as spares, meet industry guidelines?
9.6.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for mooring at an SPM or F(P)SO and were the fi
required accurately described in the HVPQ?
9.1.1 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for the testing and correct operation of th
winch brakes, and were records available to demonstrate that brakes had been tested periodically, after maintenance or w
was evidence of premature brake slippage?
9.1.2 Was the vessel satisfactorily moored in accordance with both the terminal mooring plan and the mooring configurati
permitted by the vessel’s Mooring System Management Plan?
9.4.2 Were the deck officers and ratings involved with mooring operations familiar with the safe operation of the mooring
and the dangers of working with and around mooring lines during mooring operations and while under tension?
procedure?
9.3.1 Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for anchoring operations, and were record
confirm that recent anchoring operations had been conducted in compliance with company expectations?
the bow mooring system for offshore terminals, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
9.2.1 Were the Master and all officers familiar with the vessel specific emergency towing procedure, and was the emergen
equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition and ready for immediate use?
9.2.1 Were the Master and all officers familiar with the vessel specific emergency towing procedure, and was the emergen
equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition and ready for immediate use?
4.3.2 Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedures defining machinery space operating mode and, wh
to be attended, the machinery space team composition during the various stages of a voyage, and were records available t
the machinery space had been operated accordingly?
10.1.3 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic rounds and monitorin
machinery space, and were log book entries and checklists available to confirm that the rounds had been completed as req
10.1.4 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic machinery space rou
monitoring of the machinery space during both manned and unmanned (UMS) period,s and were log book entries and che
available to confirm that the inspections had been completed as required?
procedure?
3.1.3 Did the complement of officers and ratings onboard at the time of inspection meet or exceed the requirements of th
Safe Manning Document and the declared company standard manning for routine operations, and had senior officers been
ensure continuity of operational knowledge?
10.1.4 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic machinery space rou
monitoring of the machinery space during both manned and unmanned (UMS) period,s and were log book entries and che
available to confirm that the inspections had been completed as required?
10.1.1 Had the Chief Engineer prepared Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforce
company expectations with regards to engine room management and, if so, had all engineer officers signed to acknowledg
understanding of the same?
10.3.3 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for safe entry into the machin
during UMS operation, including the operation and testing of the dead man alarm, if fitted?
10.5.3 Were the Chief Engineer and senior engineer officers familiar with the company and vessel specific fuel changeove
and were records available to demonstrate that fuel grade changeovers had been completed in compliance with the proce
MARPOL regulations?
10.4.2 Did the vessel operator subscribe to a lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program and was a procedure in place to a
results and trends identified by the analysis?
10.5.2 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for bunker fuel oil sampling a
and were records available to demonstrate that samples had been taken and retained or analysed in accordance with the
10.5.1 Were the Master, Chief Engineer, officers, and ratings involved in bunkering operations, familiar with the company
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations had been planned and conducted in accor
the company procedure?
MARPOL regulations?
MARPOL regulations?
10.2.3 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, calibration
maintenance of the exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS), and were required safety and regulatory measures being complie
procedure?
procedure?
10.3.4 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the engineers’ alarm, and was the alar
order, tested regularly and the results recorded?
10.3.5 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the machinery alarm, and was the alar
order, tested regularly and the results recorded?
5.10.7 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the escape routes from the machinery spaces, pump rooms, comp
rooms, accommodation spaces and, when in port, from the vessel, and were these routes clearly marked, unobstructed an
illuminated?
procedures?
10.2.6 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection
of the emergency air compressor and emergency air reservoir, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition?
order?
10.2.1 Were the officers familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency generator and were records available to d
that the emergency generator had been tested according to company procedures?
order?
10.7.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the measures to prevent fire in the machinery spaces caused by flamma
spraying onto a hot surface and, were the protective measures provided regularly inspected and properly maintained?
5.8.2 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the machinery spaces, a
10.7.3 Were the main engine crankcase oil mist detectors, engine bearing temperature monitors or equivalent devices an
alarms in good order?
10.7.4 Where hydraulic power packs were located within the main engine compartment, were fire protection measures p
if so, where they in satisfactory condition?
10.3.1 Was suitable deck insulation provided to the front and rear of electrical switchboards, and was it in good order?
procedure?
10.2.4 Were seawater pipelines, sea chests and seawater pumps in satisfactory condition and free of temporary repairs?
10.1.5 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation, inspection and testing of the means pro
control propulsion machinery and related auxiliary systems locally in the event of failure of a remote-control system?
10.2.2 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection, ma
and testing of the ship’s emergency batteries, and were the batteries fully charged and in satisfactory condition?
10.3.2 Were the engineer officers familiar with the purpose and setting of the insulation monitoring devices provided on t
and secondary distribution system, and were the distribution switchboards free of significant earth faults?
10.1.2 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for testing main propulsion, s
thrusters and power generation plant prior to use and at critical points during a voyage or operation, and were checklists a
entries completed as required?
4.1.3 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and testing the steerin
systems fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that operation and testing had been carried out in
with the procedures?
10.3.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and regular testin
watertight doors, and were the watertight doors in satisfactory condition?
10.6.3 Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the com
(or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations ha
planned and conducted in accordance with the company procedures?
5.1.17 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans regarding LNG bunker operations, and h
taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures?
10.6.2 Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and rating involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the func
vessel’s LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in goo
order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained?
10.6.4 Were the safety measures at the bunkering control station and bunkering manifold area in satisfactory condition?
3.3.6 Had the Master, officers and ratings received the required training and familiarisation before being assigned duties r
handling LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel?
5.6.4 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection sy
required by the IGF Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated in accordanc
company procedures and manufacturer’s instructions?


5.8.6 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the accommodation, an
5.2.8 Were the Master, officers and galley staff familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed and portable
extinguishing systems provided in the galley, were the systems in good working order and available for immediate use, and
ranges, exhaust vents, filter cowls free of grease or combustible material?
12.6.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating in areas affected by ice, and had
received suitable training?
12.1.1 Where the vessel traded in polar waters, had the Master, Chief Mate and officers in charge of a navigational watch
the additional training required by the Polar Code?
12.3.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the engine room m
and systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with?
12.2.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the life-saving and
systems and equipment in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with?
12.4.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the cargo and ball
in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with?
12.5.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the deck machiner
mooring systems, in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with?
procedures?
12.1.1 Where the vessel traded in polar waters, had the Master, Chief Mate and officers in charge of a navigational watch
the additional training required by the Polar Code?
2.5.1 Had the company Management of Change procedure been effectively implemented for changes affecting structure,
and equipment governed by Classification Society rules or statutory survey?
3.2.1 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a static navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and exp
company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.2 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and
company representative had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.3 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified spec
contractor had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.4 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that an unannounced remote navigational assessment, which inclu
of VDR & ECDIS data by an independent contractor or specialist company representative, had been completed as declared
pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.5 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive cargo audit by a suitably qualified and exper
company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.6 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive engineering audit by a suitable qualified and
company representative had been completed as declared in the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.7 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive mooring and anchoring audit by a suitably q
experienced company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire?
3.2.8 Had the vessel operator implemented a Behavioural Competency Assessment Programme onboard and was there e
available that assessments were being conducted for navigation, cargo, mooring and engineering operations by approved
3.2.8 Had the vessel operator implemented a Behavioural Competency Assessment Programme onboard and was there e
available that assessments were being conducted for navigation, cargo, mooring and engineering operations by approved
3.3.1 Had the Master and all navigation officers attended a shore-based Bridge Team Management training course within
five years?
3.3.3 Had the Master, deck officers, and cargo/gas engineer where carried, attended a shore-based simulator course cove
and emergency cargo operations within the previous five years?
3.3.4 Had the Chief Engineer and all engineer officers attended a shore-based engine room management simulator course
routine and emergency machinery operations within the previous five years?
5.1.18 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures setting out the actions to be taken in the even
leak into a double hull tank, and was all required equipment available and in satisfactory condition?
5.7.4 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company work planning procedures and were records availab
demonstrate that onboard work planning meetings had been conducted and documented in accordance with the procedu
5.7.5 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and implementation of the company Stop Work Auth
and procedure?
5.7.5 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and implementation of the company Stop Work Auth
and procedure?
5.7.8 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) procedure and
evidence that SIMOPS were considered during work planning and the required controls implemented for the duration of s
operations?
6.1.5 Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Ozone-depleting Su
Record Book, and did the entries contained in the Ozone-depleting Substances Record Book accurately record the operatio
emissions required to be documented by MARPOL Annex VI?
6.1.6 Were the documents and records required by MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13 for the control of NO x and associated
good order?
6.5.2 Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe use of the incinerator, and was the inc
satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedure and in compliance with MARPOL?
8.3.22 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing on-board doping operations, and
procedures been complied with?
8.6.9 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold r
8.99.3 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures which provided guidance on the level of super
support for cargo / port operations, and were operations supervised and supported by an appropriate team in accordance
company procedures?
9.4.1 Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedure that defined mooring team su
and composition for the various mooring and anchoring operations likely to be undertaken, and was evidence available th
mooring work space had been supervised and manned in accordance with company expectations?
10.6.1 Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the LNG fuel tank water-spray sy
cooling and fire prevention on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and mainta
VIQ7 questions
1.1 Name of the vessel
1.2 Vessel IMO Number:
1.3 Date the inspection was completed:
1.4 Was a full inspection of the vessel completed
1.5 Port of inspection:
1.6 Flag:
1.7 Deadweight:
1.8 Date the vessel was delivered:
1.9 Name of the OCIMF inspecting company:
1.10 Date and time the inspector boarded the vessel
1.11 Date and time the inspector departed the vessel:
1.12 Time taken for inspection.
1.13 Name of the inspector:
1.14 Is an up to date OCIMF Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) maintained and is it readily available?
1.15 Vessel’s operation at the time of the inspection

1.16 Product(s) being handled
1.17 Vessel type:
1.18 Hull type:
1.19 Name of the vessel’s operator
1.20 Date the current operator assumed responsibility for the vessel
1.21 Date of the last port State control inspection
1.22 Port of the last Port State Control inspection
1.23 Name of Classification society:
1.24 Date of expiry of the Class Certificate
1.25 Date of departure from the last class-credited drydock/repair period or in water survey
1.26 Does the vessel have a recent class Survey Status Report and are past Class Survey Records complete:
2.1.1 Certificate of Registry
2.1.2 Continuous Synopsis Record
2.1.3 Document of Compliance (DoC)

2.1.4 Safety Management Certificate (SMC
2.1.5 Safety Equipment Certificate, supplemented by Form E
2.1.6 Safety Radio Certificate, supplemented by Form
2.1.7 Safety Construction Certificate
2.1.8 IOPP Certificate, supplemented by Form A or B
2.1.9 What is the vessel’s designation as recorded in the IOPP Certificate, Form B, Question 1.11? 1. C
2.1.10 Minimum Safe Manning Document
2.1.11 Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Chemicals or Gas
2.1.12 Noxious Liquid Substances (NLS) Certificate
2.1.13 Civil Liability Convention Certificate(s)
2.1.14 Maritime Labour Convention (2006)
2.1.15 Ballast Water Management Certificate.
2.1 Are all the statutory certificates listed below, where applicable, valid and have the annual and intermediate surveys be
within the required range dates?
2.2 Is the vessel's P and I Club a member of the International Group?
2.3 Do the operator’s procedures manuals comply with ISM Code requirements?
2.4 Does the Operator’s representative visit the vessel at least bi-annually
2.5 Is a recent operator’s internal audit report available and is a close-out system in place for dealing with non-conformitie
2.5 Is a recent operator’s internal audit report available and is a close-out system in place for dealing with non-conformitie
2.6 Does the Master review the safety management system, report to the operator on any deficiencies and does the opera
the Master's review
2.7 Is the vessel free of conditions of class or significant recommendations, memoranda or notations?
2.8 Has the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment programme (CAP)?
2.9 Are procedures in place to carry out regular inspections of cargo and ballast tanks, void spaces, trunks and cofferdams
personnel and are records maintained?
2.10 Are the Engine Room (Part I) and Cargo (Part II) Oil Record Books (ORBs) correctly completed, free of any pollution inc
and are slop/waste oil disposal certificates provided?
2.10 Are the Engine Room (Part I) and Cargo (Part II) Oil Record Books (ORBs) correctly completed, free of any pollution inc
and are slop/waste oil disposal certificates provided?
2.11 If the disposal of engine room oily water or sludge to a cargo or slop tank has taken place, has the event been recorde
Record Books, was the receiving tank free of cargo and have the transfer arrangements been approved as per IOPP Form B
2.12 Is the vessel in possession of an approved Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Management Plan and the deck officers
general contents and requirements of the plan?
2.13 Is the vessel provided with an approved Ballast Water and Sediments Management Plan, are records maintained of a
exchanges or treatment operations and are the officers aware of BWM requirements?
2.14 Does the vessel have a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) and are officers aware of the general requir
the plan?
2.15 Is the vessel free of any documentary or visual evidence to indicate any structural concerns?
2.15 Is the vessel free of any documentary or visual evidence to indicate any structural concerns?
2.16 If any cargo / ballast tanks, void or hold spaces were sighted from the deck, were they in good order, free from oil con
could the vessel easily check or sample segregated ballast prior to deballasting?
3.1 Does the manning level meet or exceed that required by the Minimum Safe Manning Document?
3.2 Are the STCW and flag Administration’s regulations that control hours of work to minimise fatigue being followed and
maintaining hours of rest records in compliance with MLC or STCW requirements?
3.3 Are all personnel able to communicate effectively in a common language?
3.4 Has the Master attended a ship handling course where applicable?
3.5 Does the officers’ matrix posted for the vessel on the SIRE website accurately reflect the information relating to the offi
the time of the inspection?
3.6 Are those officers who have immediate responsibility for cargo transfer, in possession of the Certificates of Specialized
applicable to the type of cargo being carried?
3.7 If the vessel is equipped with an Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) have the Master and deck offi
both, generic training and type-specific familiarisation on the system fitted onboard
3.7 If the vessel is equipped with an Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) have the Master and deck offi
both, generic training and type-specific familiarisation on the system fitted onboard
3.8 Does the operator have measures in place to prevent Drug and Alcohol abuse in accordance with OCIMF guidance?
4.1 Are the deck officers’ familiar with the Company navigation procedures and instructions and are the Company navigati
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
comprehensive?
4.2 Is the vessel maintaining an adequate record of all navigational activities, both at sea and during pilotage?
4.3 Are procedures in place for the testing of bridge equipment before arrival / departure and check-lists in effective use fo
departure, watch handover and master-pilot exchange?
4.4 Are fire and safety rounds being completed after each watch, recorded in the deck log and are the staff conducting the
their duties here?
4.5 Are the deck officers’ familiar with the operators Under Keel Clearance policy, able to demonstrate satisfactory UKC ca
last voyage and is the policy comprehensive?
4.5 Are the deck officers’ familiar with the operators Under Keel Clearance policy, able to demonstrate satisfactory UKC ca
last voyage and is the policy comprehensive?
4.6 Has the Bridge been adequately manned at all stages of the voyage and at anchor and were lookout arrangements ade
4.7.1 A receiver for a global navigation satellite system or terrestrial navigation radio navigation
system
4.7.2 A Navtex receiver.
4.7.3 A whistle, bell and gong.
4.7.4 Shapes
4.7.5 A properly adjusted standard magnetic compass
4.7.6 A steering magnetic compass
4.7.7 Means for taking bearings
4.7.8 A spare magnetic compass.
4.7.9 A telephone
4.7.10 A daylight signalling lamp
4.7.11 An automatic identification system (AIS).
4.7.12 A VHF radio.
4.7.13 A gyro compass and repeaters.
4.7.14 Visual compass readings to the emergency steering position

4.7.15 A radar installation.
4.7.16 Radar plotting equipment
4.7.17 An echo sounder.
4.7.18 A speed and distance indicator
4.7.19 Rudder angle, RPM, variable pitch and bow/stern thruster indicators.
4.7.20 Radar installations.
4.7.21 An ARPA.
4.7.22 A rate of turn indicator.
4.7.23 A receiver for a global satellite navigation system or terrestrial navigation radio navigation
system.
4.7.24 A Navtex receiver.
4.7.25 A whistle, bell and gong.
4.7.26 Shapes.
4.7.27 A properly adjusted magnetic compass.
4.7.28 A pelorus or compass bearing device
4.7.29 Means of correcting heading and bearings to true at all times
4.7.30 A sound reception system.
4.7.31 A telephone.
4.7.32 A spare magnetic compass.
4.7.33 A daylight signalling lamp.
4.7.34 Bridge navigational watch alarm system (BNWAS)
4.7.35 An echo sounding device.
4.7.36 A 9 GHz (3 cm ‘X’ band) radar.
4.7.37 An electronic plotting aid.
4.7.38 A speed and distance measuring device.
4.7.39 A properly adjusted transmitting heading device.
4.7.40 A VHF radio.
4.7.41 An automatic identification system (AIS).
4.7.42 A gyro compass.
4.7.43 A gyro compass heading repeater.
4.7.44 A gyro compass bearing repeater.
4.7.45 Rudder, propeller, thrust, pitch and operational mode indicators
4.7.46 An automatic tracking aid.
4.7.47 A 3 GHz (10 cm, ‘S’ band) radar
4.7.48 A second automatic tracking aid.
4.7.49 A voyage data recorder. (VDR)

4.7.50 Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS)
4.7.51 An ARPA, equipped with speed through the water input
4.7.52 A heading or track control system.
4.7.53 A rate of turn indicator.
4.7.54 A speed and distance measuring device
4.7 Is navigation equipment appropriate for the size of the vessel and in good order?
4.7 Is navigation equipment appropriate for the size of the vessel and in good order?
4.8 Are navigation lights in good order, the OOW aware of the procedures for testing the lights and actions in event of failu
4.9 Are the Standard Magnetic and Gyro compasses in good order and is the OOW aware of the requirements for taking co
is the compass error book maintained.
4.10 Was the hand steering in use for the vessels transit from pilotage to the berth as appropriate and are deck officer’s fa
changeover from hand steering to auto and vice versa?
4.10 Was the hand steering in use for the vessels transit from pilotage to the berth as appropriate and are deck officer’s fa
changeover from hand steering to auto and vice versa?
4.11 Are the Deck Officers familiar with procedures to retain the VDR data in the event of an incident?
4.12 Is there an effective Chart and Publication (Paper and Electronic) Management System in place and are the deck offic
the process including the effective management of T and P notices?
4.13 Are deck officers aware of the requirements for managing Navtex and Navarea Warnings and is there evidence of an
in place to monitor these warnings?
4.14 Are Master and deck officer’s familiar with the operation of the ECDIS system fitted on board?
4.15 Is the master and deck officers’ familiar with the safety parameter settings for the ECDIS and have the safety settings
applied for the vessels passage?
4.16 Were the charts used for the previous voyage appropriate?
4.16 Were the charts used for the previous voyage appropriate?
4.17 Are the master and deck officers aware of the requirements of Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDI
system fitted meet SOLAS and flag state requirements? ECDIS must be “t
4.18 Has the vessel been safely navigated in compliance with international regulations and are deck officers’ familiar with
requirements?
4.19 Is the master and deck officers aware of the requirements for the echo sounder and is there evidence that it has been
appropriate during the voyage?
4.20 Was a comprehensive berth to berth passage plan available for the previous voyage and were the deck officers aware
requirements including the use of parallel indexing both at sea and during pilotage?
4.21 Are deck officers’ familiar with the preparation and transmission of distress and urgency messages on the GMDSS equ
instructions clearly displayed and equipment in good order?
4.22 Are officers aware of the function of the ship security alert system and how it operates?
4.23 Are the officers aware of the periodical test requirements for GMDSS equipment and is the radio logbook correctly m
entries of such tests
4.24 Is there a maintenance programme in place to ensure availability of the radio equipment?
4.25 Is the satellite EPIRB fitted, armed, labelled correctly and inspected in accordance with the manufacturer's requireme
4.26 Is the vessel equipped with sufficient intrinsically safe portable radios for use on deck?
4.27 Are survival craft portable VHF radios and Search and Rescue Locating Devices in good order and charged?
4.27 Are survival craft portable VHF radios and Search and Rescue Locating Devices in good order and charged?
5.1 Are officers’ familiar with the process for conducting Risk Assessments for routine and non_x0002_routine tasks, do op
adequate procedures for conducting RA and is there sufficient evidence of this process undertaken?
5.2 Is there evidence of a permit to work system in place for hazardous activities, are the crew aware of these requiremen
documented evidence of compliance?
5.3 Is the appointed Safety Officer suitably trained, aware of his responsibilities and is there evidence to show that the safe
been effectively performing duties associated with this role?
5.4 Are the ship's officers able to demonstrate their familiarisation with the operation of fixed and portable firefighting, life
emergency equipment?
5.5 Are the crew aware of the requirements for wearing personal protective equipment such as boiler suits, safety footwe
protection, safety harnesses, respiratory and chemical protective equipment?
5.6 Is all electronic equipment in use in gas hazardous areas intrinsically safe?
5.6 Is all electronic equipment in use in gas hazardous areas intrinsically safe?
5.7 Are crew members participating in safety meetings and is there evidence of effective discussions on safety related issu
management feedback?
5.8 Are the crew aware of the requirements for reporting of accidents, incidents, non_x0002_conformities and near misse
effective system of reporting and follow up investigation in place?
5.8 Are the crew aware of the requirements for reporting of accidents, incidents, non_x0002_conformities and near misse
effective system of reporting and follow up investigation in place?
5.9 Are the officers and ratings aware of the requirements of the ISGOTT Ship/Shore Safety Check List (SSSCL) and are the
check list being complied with?
5.10 Are the crew aware of the requirements to keep external doors, ports and windows closed in port and is the accomm
atmosphere maintained at a slightly higher pressure than that of the ambient air?
5.11 Is all loose gear on deck, machinery rooms, stores and in internal spaces properly secured?
5.11 Is all loose gear on deck, machinery rooms, stores and in internal spaces properly secured?
5.12 Are the crew familiar with the location and operation of fire and safety equipment and have familiarisations been effe
completed for all staff
5.13 Are the crew familiar with their duties in the event of an emergency and are emergency drills being carried out as req
5.14 Are the crew familiar with their duties during lifeboat and fire drills and are drills being performed effectively and on a
meeting SOLAS and flag state requirements?
5.15 Is there evidence of regular training in the use of life-saving equipment undertaken and are crew familiar with those r
the location / contents of the training manuals?
5.16 Are the officers aware of the industry requirements for enclosed space entry and have these been correctly followed?
5.17 Are the crew aware of safe entry procedures into the pump room, compressor rooms and trunk spaces as applicable
procedures being followed?
5.18 Are pump room, compressor rooms and trunk spaces (as applicable) adequately ventilated?
5.19 Are the officers aware of the correct settings of pump room fire and flooding dampers and are the dampers clearly m
order?
5.19 Are the officers aware of the correct settings of pump room fire and flooding dampers and are the dampers clearly m
order?
5.20 Are the crew aware of the permanent arrangements provided for lifting an incapacitated person from the cargo and,
ballast pumproom, including provision of a suitable stretcher or harness and is the equipment in good order?
5.21 Are spaces adjacent to cargo tanks, including pipe ducts, regularly monitored for accumulations of gas with an operab
portable measuring equipment
5.21 Are spaces adjacent to cargo tanks, including pipe ducts, regularly monitored for accumulations of gas with an operab
portable measuring equipment
5.22 Where a fixed system to monitor flammable atmospheres in non-cargo spaces is fitted, are recorders and alarms in or
5.23 Does the vessel have appropriate duplicate portable gas detection equipment suitable for the cargoes carried, are the
with the operation, calibration and is the equipment being maintained in accordance with manufacturers and industry rec
5.24 Are officers aware of the requirements for hot work and are hot work procedures in accordance with the recommend
and OCIMF guidelines?
5.25 Are officers aware of safety guidelines for electric welding equipment, are written guidelines posted and equipment i
5.26 Is gas welding and burning equipment in good order and spare oxygen and acetylene cylinders stored apart in a well-
location outside of the accommodation and engine room?
5.27 Are the officers aware of the requirements of LSA, are there ship-specific life-saving equipment maintenance instructi
are weekly and monthly inspections being carried out?
5.28 Are the officers aware of the maintenance requirements for lifeboat, liferaft, rescue boat release hooks and free-fall l
systems, where fitted and, are lifeboats, rescue boat and liferafts including associated equipment well maintained ready fo
5.29 Are lifeboats, including their equipment and launching mechanisms, in good order and have they been launched and
the water in accordance with SOLAS requirements?
5.30 Is the rescue boat, including its equipment and launching arrangement, in good order and officers’ familiar with the la
procedures?
5.30 Is the rescue boat, including its equipment and launching arrangement, in good order and officers’ familiar with the la
procedures?
5.31 Are lifebuoys, associated equipment and pyrotechnics in good order, clearly marked and are there clear procedures in
that only intrinsically safe lights are located in the gas hazardous areas?
5.31 Are lifebuoys, associated equipment and pyrotechnics in good order, clearly marked and are there clear procedures in
that only intrinsically safe lights are located in the gas hazardous areas?
5.32 Are lifejackets in good order and correctly located?
5.33 Are immersion suits in a good order, correctly positioned and officers aware of maintenance and carriage requiremen
5.33 Are immersion suits in a good order, correctly positioned and officers aware of maintenance and carriage requiremen
5.34 Are ship-specific fire training manuals and safety operational booklets available and are the crew aware of the genera
location of the manuals?
5.35 Are the crew aware of the fixed firefighting equipment fitted, are ship specific firefighting equipment maintenance ins
available and is maintenance being carried out?
5.36 Are records available to show that samples of foam compound have been tested at regular intervals?
5.37 Are the crew aware of the location and use of the International Shore Connection, is it readily available externally, is a
exhibited within the accommodation, also a copy available externally and equipment correctly marked on the plan?
5.38 Are fire mains, pumps, hoses, nozzles and isolating valves in good order, available for immediate use and clearly mark
5.38 Are fire mains, pumps, hoses, nozzles and isolating valves in good order, available for immediate use and clearly mark
5.39 Are officers aware of the requirements for testing fixed fire detection and alarm systems and are the systems in good
regularly?
5.40 Are the crew familiar with the fixed fire extinguishing systems, where fitted, are they in good order and are clear oper
posted?
5.41 Is the emergency fire pump in full operational condition, starting instructions clearly displayed and are officers able to
pump?
5.42 Are portable fire extinguishers in good order with operating instructions clearly marked and are crew members famili
operation?
5.43 Are crew members familiar with donning breathing apparatus and are Fireman’s Outfits in good order and ready for i
5.44 Are crew members familiar with the donning of Emergency Escape Breathing Devices (EEBD's) located in the accomm
room and pump room (as applicable) and are they in good order and ready for immediate use?
5.45 Are fire flaps clearly marked to indicate the spaces they serve and is there evidence of regular testing and maintenanc
5.46 Are Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) on board for all the cargo, bunkers, chemicals, paints and other products bein
are all officers’ familiar with their use?
5.47 Is the vessel provided with a safe means of access and are all available means of access (gangway / accommodation la
ladder / transfer basket) in good order and well maintained?
5.48 Is there a suitable means for storing of cargo and bunker samples cargo and bunker sample locker situated within the
and is it in good order?
6.1 Are the ship’s crew familiar with their duties in relation to the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) / Shipbo
Pollution Emergency Plan (SMPEP), is the plan maintained updated with emergency contacts readily available?
6.1 Are the ship’s crew familiar with their duties in relation to the Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP) / Shipbo
Pollution Emergency Plan (SMPEP), is the plan maintained updated with emergency contacts readily available?
6.2 Is the ship fitted with a main deck boundary coaming and scupper arrangement that is effectively plugged during opera
6.3 Are means readily available for dealing with small oil or chemical spills?
6.4 Are Annex 1 and 2 overboard valves and cargo system sea valves suitably secured, thoroughly checked closed prior to
of cargo transfer and where provided, sea valve-testing arrangements in order and regularly monitored for leakage?
6.5 If ballast lines pass through cargo and/or Bunker tanks are they tested regularly, and the results recorded?
6.6 Are adequate manifold spill containers and gratings in place under the cargo manifolds, fitted with suitable drainage ar
are they empty?
6.7 Have bunker pipelines been satisfactorily tested on an annual basis and is there suitable evidence of this test?
6.8 Are unused cargo and bunker pipeline manifolds fully bolted and are all drains, vents and unused gauge stems, suitably
capped?
6.9 Is suitable spill containment fitted around all fuel, diesel and lubricating oil tank vents and hydraulic deck machinery?
6.10 Are the arrangements for the disposal of oily water in the forecastle and other internal spaces adequate and are offic
these requirements?
6.11 Are pump room / trunk space bilge high level alarms fitted, regularly tested and the results recorded?
6.12 Are adequate arrangements provided for pipeline draining and the disposal of pump room bilge accumulations?
6.12 Are adequate arrangements provided for pipeline draining and the disposal of pump room bilge accumulations?
6.13 If an ODME is fitted, is it in good order, well maintained and any operational downtime recorded in the ORB?
6.14 Are the engine room bilge oily water pumping and disposal arrangements in good order?
6.15 Are emergency bilge pumping arrangements ready for immediate use; is the emergency bilge suction clearly identifie
fitted, is the emergency overboard discharge valve provided with a notice warning against accidental opening?
6.16 Have disposals of sludge and other machinery waste been conducted in accordance with MARPOL requirements?
6.17 Is the oily water separator in good order, free from unauthorised modifications and are the engineers well familiar wi
and data recovery procedure where applicable?
6.17 Is the oily water separator in good order, free from unauthorised modifications and are the engineers well familiar wi
and data recovery procedure where applicable?
6.18 Are specific warning notices posted to safeguard against the accidental opening of the overboard discharge valve from
separator?
6.19 If the oily water separator is not fitted with an automatic stopping device, do entries in the Oil Record Book Part 1 ind
not been used in a Special Area?
6.19 If the oily water separator is not fitted with an automatic stopping device, do entries in the Oil Record Book Part 1 ind
not been used in a Special Area?
6.20 Is the vessel correctly segregating garbage and able to store garbage in a safe hygienic manner onboard and is the gar
handled in accordance with the vessel’s garbage management plan and is garbage record book being correctly maintained
6.21 If the vessel is provided with an approved Ballast Water Treatment System, is the system in good order, used where r
officer’s familiar with the safe operation of the same
6.21 If the vessel is provided with an approved Ballast Water Treatment System, is the system in good order, used where r
officer’s familiar with the safe operation of the same
6.22 Where a Ballast Water Treatment Plant is fitted is it maintained in accordance with manufacturers and vessels planne
requirements?
6.22 Where a Ballast Water Treatment Plant is fitted is it maintained in accordance with manufacturers and vessels planne
requirements?
7.1 Does the vessel have an approved Ship Security Plan?
7.2 Is the Master & Crew aware of the name and contact details of the company security officer, and are these details post
7.3 Are ship security records related to port calls being maintained?
7.4 Are records of training and maintenance of equipment related to the ship security plan available
7.4 Are records of training and maintenance of equipment related to the ship security plan available
7.5 Has the ship’s security officer been trained to undertake this role and do they understand their responsibilities?
7.6 If fitted, is the vessel’s dedicated standalone security communications equipment regularly tested
7.7 Does the vessel have a routine to regularly test the ship security alert system?
7.8 Does the Passage Plan include security related information for each leg of the voyage?
7.9 Does the vessel have a voyage/transit security risk assessment?
7.10 Does the vessel have procedures for vessel hardening?
7.11 Does the Master/SSO have a clear understanding of the procedures for voluntary security reporting?
7.12 Is an adequate deck watch being maintained to prevent unauthorised access in port
7.13 Has the company provided a list of security charts, publications and guidelines to the ship?
7.14 Are Cyber Security Policy and Procedures part of the Safety Management System and is there a Cyber Response Plan
7.15 Are the crew aware of the company policy on the control of physical access to all shipboard IT/OT systems?
7.16 Does the company have a policy or guidance on the use of personal devices onboard?
7.17 Is Cyber Security awareness actively promoted by the company and onboard?
8.1 pet. Are the officers aware of the operator's policy statements, guidance and procedures, including information on ma
rates and venting capacities with regard to safe cargo operations?
8.1 chem. Are the officers aware of the operator's policy statements, guidance and procedures, including information on m
rates and venting capacities with regard to safe cargo operations?
8.1 lpg. Are the officers aware of the operator's policy statements, guidance and procedures, including information on ma
rates and instructions with regard to safe cargo operations?
8.1 lng. Are the officers aware of the operator's policy statements, guidance and procedures, including information on ma
rates and instructions with regard to safe cargo operations?
8.2 pet. Are legible and up to date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams of cargo, inert gas and venting systems, as applicable, a
pumproom(s) and cargo control area and deck officer’s familiar with the systems?
8.2 chem. Are legible and up to date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams of cargo, inert gas and venting systems, as applicable
pumproom(s) and cargo control area and deck officers’ familiar with the systems?
8.2 lpg. Are the officers aware of any loading limitations for the vessel and are these limitations, if applicable clearly poste
control area?
8.2 lng. Are the officers aware of any loading limitations for the vessel and are these limitations, if applicable clearly poste
control area?
8.3 pet. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the test requirements for the cargo lines
inert gas lines in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing where applicable?
8.3 chem. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the test requirements for cargo lines,
gas lines on the system?
8.3 chem. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the test requirements for cargo lines,
gas lines on the system?
8.3 lpg. Are legible and up to date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams of cargo, inert gas and venting systems, as applicable, a
cargo control area and deck officers’ familiar with the systems?
8.3 lng. Are legible and up to date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams of cargo, inert gas and venting systems, as applicable, a
cargo control area and deck officers’ familiar with the systems?
8.4 pet. If a loading computer or programme is in use, is it class approved, regularly tested and are officers aware of the te
including damage stability?
8.4 chem. Are officers’ familiar with the information contained within the Procedures and Arrangements Manual, and is th
accessible onboard?
8.4 chem. Are officers’ familiar with the information contained within the Procedures and Arrangements Manual, and is th
accessible onboard?
8.4 lpg. Are officers’ familiar with the information contained within the Procedures and Arrangements Manual, and is the
onboard?
8.4 lng. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
and damage stability and are any limitations, where applicable understood by the cargo watch officers and clearly docume
8.4 lng. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
8.5 pet. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
8.5 pet. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
8.5 chem. Is the Cargo Record Book correctly completed and up to date?
8.5 lpg. Is the Cargo Record Book correctly completed and up to date?
8.5 lng. If a loading computer or programme is in use, is it class approved, regularly tested and are officers aware of the te
8.6 pet. Is the vessel free of inherent intact stability problems, are officer’s aware of these problems or risks of structural d
sloshing, and actions required if the vessel takes on an unstable condition and/or an angle of loll.
8.6 chem. Are the officers aware of the hazards of tank cleaning where flammable and/or toxic products have been carrie
use of chemicals and solvents, gas freeing and steaming of cargo tanks?
8.6 chem. Are the officers aware of the hazards of tank cleaning where flammable and/or toxic products have been carrie
use of chemicals and solvents, gas freeing and steaming of cargo tanks?
8.6 lpg. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
8.6 lpg. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers documented
8.6 lng. Is the vessel free of inherent intact stability problems, are officers aware of these problems or risks of structural d
sloshing, and actions required if the vessel takes on an unstable condition and/or angle of loll?
8.7 pet. Are all officers and ratings aware of the carriage requirements including emergency procedures for the specific car
are officers’ familiar with the vessels cargo system, including emergency discharge arrangements?
8.7 chem. 'If a loading computer or programme is in use, is it class approved, regularly tested and are officers aware of the
requirements including damage stability?
8.7 lpg. If a loading computer or programme is in use, is it class approved, regularly tested and are officers aware of the te
8.7 lng. Is a Cargo Operations Manual available that covers all cargo operations and are officers’ familiar with the manual
8.8 pet. Are the cargo, ballast and stripping pumps, eductors and their associated instrumentation and controls including t
monitoring, in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.8 chem. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers document
and damage stability and are any limitations, where applicable understood by the cargo watch officers, clearly documente
8.8 chem. Has a cargo plan been prepared and followed with a detailed sequence of cargo and ballast transfers document
and damage stability and are any limitations, where applicable understood by the cargo watch officers, clearly documente
8.8 lpg. Is the vessel free of inherent intact stability problems, are officers aware of these problems or risks of structural d
8.8 lpg. Is the vessel free of inherent intact stability problems, are officers aware of these problems or risks of structural d
8.8 lng Are all officers and ratings aware of the carriage requirements including emergency procedures for LNG and are offi
with the vessels cargo system, including emergency discharge arrangements?
8.9 pet. Are officers aware of the column/cofferdam purging routines where deep well pumps are fitted and is the pump le
tolerable limits?
8.9 chem. Is the vessel free of inherent intact stability problems, are officers aware of these problems or risks of structura
8.9 lpg. Are all officers and ratings aware of the carriage requirements including emergency procedures for the specific ca
gases in general and are officers’ familiar with the vessels cargo system, including emergency discharge arrangements?
8.9 lng. Are cargo operations being carried out and logged in accordance with the plan?
8.10 pet. Are the officers and ratings aware of the location of the cargo pump emergency stops, is the emergency cargo pu
system in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.10 chem. Are all officers and ratings aware of the carriage requirements including emergency procedures for the specifi
and chemicals in general and are officers’ familiar with the vessels cargo system, including emergency discharge arrangem
8.10 lpg. Is the chief officer familiar with the term 'reference temperature' and is he/she aware of the reference temperat
existing cargo?
8.10 lng. Are all officers aware of the emergency procedures for dealing with leakage, spillage or fire involving the cargo?
8.11 pet. Are the cargo and ballast system valves in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.11 chem. Can the deck officers demonstrate familiarity with the use of cargo compatibility charts and are dangers of co-m
compatible cargoes considered?
8.11 lpg. Is a cargo compatibility chart available?
8.11 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirement to isolate the electrical supply of the submerged cargo pump motors, w
during gas-freeing operations and are the pumps fitted with an automatic shut down in the event of low liquid level?
8.11 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirement to isolate the electrical supply of the submerged cargo pump motors, w
during gas-freeing operations and are the pumps fitted with an automatic shut down in the event of low liquid level?
8.12 pet. Are the cargo system ullage gauges, vapour locks and UTI tapes in good order and is there recorded evidence of r
8.12 pet. Are the cargo system ullage gauges, vapour locks and UTI tapes in good order and is there recorded evidence of r
8.12 chem. Are officers aware of the documentation and handling requirements for cargoes with inhibitors, and if the carg
required to be inhibited, is the required information available?
8.12 lpg. Are cargo operations being carried out and logged in accordance with the plan?
8.12 lng. Are the cargo, ballast and stripping pumps, eductors and their associated instrumentation and controls, where fi
order, free of leaks and is there evidence of regular testing?
8.13 pet. Are the remote and local temperature and pressure sensors and gauges in good order and is there recorded evid
testing?
testing?
testing?
8.13chem. Are officers aware of the dangers associated with tank cleaning and ventilation after the carriage of volatile or t
is a comprehensive tank cleaning plan established and followed prior to each operation?
8.13chem. Are officers aware of the dangers associated with tank cleaning and ventilation after the carriage of volatile or t
is a comprehensive tank cleaning plan established and followed prior to each operation?
8.13 lpg. Are officers aware of the documentation and handling requirements for cargoes with inhibitors, and if the cargo
required to be inhibited, is the required information available?
8.13 lng. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the requirements for cargo lines and va
system?
8.13 lng. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the requirements for cargo lines and va
system?
8.14 pet. Are the cargo tank high level and overfill alarms in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.14 chem. Are officers aware of the column/cofferdam purging routines where deep well pumps are fitted and is any pum
tolerable limits?
8.14 lpg. Are all officers aware of the emergency procedures for dealing with leakage, spillage or fire involving the cargo?
8.14 lng. Are the cargo and ballast system valves in good order and is there evidence of regular testing?
8.15 pet. Where fitted, is the condition of the cargo tank heating system satisfactory, is it regularly tested and is any obser
of oil?
8.15 chem. Are deck officers’ familiar with the requirements for passivation and pickling of stainless steel cargo tanks, are
performed as required and are there clear procedures available for the process?
8.15 lpg. Are the cargo, booster, ballast and stripping pumps, eductors and their associated instrumentation and controls,
good order, free of leaks and is there evidence of regular testing?
8.15 lng. Are the officers aware of the test requirements for cargo system remote and local tank pressure, temperature, a
and gauges, and are these in good order with evidence of regular testing?
8.16 pet. If the vessel is handling volatile or toxic cargoes, is it operating in a closed condition?
8.16 chem. If the vessel provided with wall wash test equipment, are the officers familiar with the wall wash test procedur
procedures comprehensive and consider the safety aspects of the process?
8.16 lpg. Are the officers aware of the operational requirements for the cargo heater and/or vaporiser, where fitted, are t
and is there evidence of regular pressure testing?
8.16 lng. Are the officers aware of the emergency discharge method in the event of cargo pump failure and are there clea
addressing this process?
8.17 pet. Is the vessel provided with an approved vapour control system?
8.17 chem. Are cargo samples safely stored within the main cargo area, and are officers and crew aware of safe handling p
8.17 lpg. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the requirements for cargo lines, vapou
lines on the system?
8.17 lpg. Are cargo pump performance curves available, are deck officers aware of the requirements for cargo lines, vapou
lines on the system?
8.17 lng. Are tank domes, associated fittings in good order, free from corrosion and leaks?
8.18 pet. Do tank hatches, tank cleaning apertures and sighting ports appear to be liquid and gas tight?
8.18 chem. Are the cargo, ballast and stripping pumps, eductors and their associated instrumentation and controls, in goo
there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.18 chem. Are the cargo, ballast and stripping pumps, eductors and their associated instrumentation and controls, in goo
there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.18 lpg. Are the Cargo and ballast system valves in good order and is there evidence of regular testing?
8.18 lng. Is the insulation on cargo or vapour lines in good order and inspection routines in place?
8.19 pet. Are the officers aware of the primary and secondary cargo tank venting systems and are the systems functioning
8.19 chem. Are the cargo and ballast pump bearing, casing and shaft gland temperature monitoring sensors in good order
evidence of regular testing?
8.19 lpg. Are the officers aware of the test requirements for cargo system remote and local tank pressure, temperature, a
and gauges, and are these in good order with evidence of regular testing?
8.19 lng. Are cargo or vapour lines joints electrically bonded?
8.20 pet. If stop valves are fitted which permit isolation of individual tanks from the common venting system, are they pro
positive locking arrangements and are the keys under the control of the person in overall charge of the cargo transfer?
8.20 chem. Are the officers and ratings aware of the location of the cargo pump emergency stops, is the emergency cargo
system in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.20 lpg. Are the officers aware of the test requirements for the cargo tank high level and overflow alarms, and are they in
evidence of regular testing and in use for both cargo loading and discharging?
8.20 lng. Are cargo and vapour line expansion arrangements in good order and liquid/vapour lines free to move inside the
8.21 pet. Are the P/V valves in good order, inspected and cleaned as part of a regular planned maintenance routine and ar
support this?
8.21 chem. Are the cargo and ballast system valves in good order and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.21 lpg. Are tank domes, associated fittings in good order, free from corrosion and leaks?
8.21 lng. Are cargo line and system relief valves in good order and officers aware of the requirements?
8.22 pet. Was the inert gas system in use and operating satisfactorily at the time of the inspection?
8.22 pet. Was the inert gas system in use and operating satisfactorily at the time of the inspection?
8.22 chem. Are the cargo system ullage gauges, vapour locks and UTI tapes in good order and are there recorded evidence
testing?
8.22 chem. Are the cargo system ullage gauges, vapour locks and UTI tapes in good order and are there recorded evidence
testing?
8.22 lpg. Are officers aware of safe cargo sampling procedures, are sample lines provided for both liquid and vapour with
arrangement on the liquid line and capped when not in use?
8.22 lng. Are cargo pipelines free of screwed-in connections?
8.23 pet. Is there evidence to show that regular maintenance has been conducted on the inert gas system, including the o
non-return valve(s)?
8.23 chem. Are the remote and local temperature and pressure sensors and gauges in good order and is there recorded ev
testing?
8.23 chem. Are the remote and local temperature and pressure sensors and gauges in good order and is there recorded ev
testing?
8.23 lpg. Where any cargo or vapour lines are insulated, is the insulation in good order and inspection routines in place?
8.23 lng. Is the cargo tank high level alarm system independent of both the gauging system and in the case of IGC vessels,
of the high level shut-down (overflow control) system and are officers aware of the override procedures where provided
8.24 pet. Are the deck officers aware of required actions in the event of the inert gas failure and are all cargo tanks mainta
positive pressure throughout?
8.24 pet. Are the deck officers aware of required actions in the event of the inert gas failure and are all cargo tanks mainta
8.24 chem. Are the cargo tank high level and overflow alarms in good order, independent of both the gauging devices and
control alarm system and is there recorded evidence of regular testing?
8.24 lpg. Where cargo or vapour lines are isolated from the structure, are joints electrically bonded?
8.24 lng. Are there records of the calibration of key cargo instrumentation, including temperature and pressure gauges?
8.25 pet. Is the inert gas system including instrumentation, alarms, trips and pressure and oxygen recorders, in good orde
8.25 chem. Are pipeline drains and stub pieces valved and capped and are cargo line drains suitably positioned to preclude
in the line after draining?
8.25 chem. Are pipeline drains and stub pieces valved and capped and are cargo line drains suitably positioned to preclude
in the line after draining?
8.25 lpg. Are cargo and vapour line expansion arrangements in good order?
8.25 lng. Is cargo measurement and custody transfer system in good condition?
8.25 lng. Is cargo measurement and custody transfer system in good condition?
8.26 pet. Was the fixed oxygen analyser calibrated immediately prior to use of the inert gas system and do local and remo
pressure recorders, where fitted, agree?
8.26 pet. Was the fixed oxygen analyser calibrated immediately prior to use of the inert gas system and do local and remo
pressure recorders, where fitted, agree?
8.26 chem. Are officers aware of the requirements for calibration of key cargo instrumentation, including temperature and
and are records onboard to verify this being performed?
8.26 lpg. Are liquid and vapour lines free to move inside their clamps?
8.26 lng. Are the officers aware of the test requirements for the cargo tank high level and overflow alarms, and are they in
evidence of regular testing and in use for both cargo loading and discharging?
8.27 pet. Is the liquid level in the deck seal at the correct level, clearly visible and are officers aware of requirements to per
the level?
8.27 chem. Where fitted, is the condition of the cargo tank heating system satisfactory, is it regularly tested and is any obs
of oil?
8.27 lpg. Are pipeline drains and stub pieces valved and capped and in good order?
8.27 lng. Are the bulkhead seals between the, compressor room and the motor room, gas tight and operating effectively?
8.28 pet. Does the P/V breaker appear to be in good order?
8.28 chem. If fixed tank gauges are not fitted, are sufficient portable tapes provided to simultaneously gauge each tank be
8.28 lpg. Are cargo line and system relief valves in good order and officers aware of the requirements?
8.28 lng. Are the cargo machinery rooms well-lit and are electrical fittings suitable for use in gas_x0002_hazardous areas a
8.29 pet. If the vessel is provided with a nitrogen generator / bottle manifold system, are the officers and crew aware of th
associated with nitrogen gas?
8.29 chem. Are the officers aware of what is considered a volatile or toxic cargo, is the vessel operating in a closed conditio
volatile or toxic cargo is carried and do tank hatches, tank cleaning apertures and sighting ports appear to be liquid and ga
8.29 chem. Are the officers aware of what is considered a volatile or toxic cargo, is the vessel operating in a closed conditio
volatile or toxic cargo is carried and do tank hatches, tank cleaning apertures and sighting ports appear to be liquid and ga
8.29 lpg. Are cargo pipelines free of screwed-in connections?

8.29 lng. Are officers aware of the requirements for the compressor room ventilation system and is the system maintainin
relative pressure?
8.30 pet. Are officers and ratings aware of safe entry requirements for the inert gas room(s), are these procedures being fo
where applicable, is fixed oxygen detection provided?
8.30 chem. Was the inert gas system in use and operating satisfactorily at the time of the inspection?
8.30 chem. Was the inert gas system in use and operating satisfactorily at the time of the inspection?
8.30 lpg. Is the cargo tank high level alarm system independent of both the gauging system and in the case of IGC vessels,
of the high level shut-down (overflow control) system and are officers aware of the override procedures where provided?
8.30 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirements for airlocks, are the alarms in good order and in the event of pressure
lost, will the shutdown system operate correctly?
8.31 pet. Are the officers’ familiar with the dangers associated with over pressurisation of the cargo tanks and are procedu
to avoid over pressure due to purging, blowing and pigging with nitrogen?
8.31 chem. Is there evidence to show that regular maintenance has been conducted on the inert gas system, including the
8.31 lpg. Are there records of the calibration of key cargo instrumentation, including temperature and pressure gauges?
8.31 lng. Is the compressor room free of gas leaks?
8.32 pet. Is the Crude Oil Washing system approved and are officers aware of the requirements within the COW Manual?
8.32 chem. Are the deck officers aware of required actions in the event of the inert gas failure and are all cargo tanks main
8.32 chem. Are the deck officers aware of required actions in the event of the inert gas failure and are all cargo tanks main
8.32 lpg. Are the officers aware of the dangers of using slip tubes where fitted and do procedures preclude their use excep
emergencies?
8.32 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the operation and requirements of the fixed gas detection equipment and is the eq
order?
8.32 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the operation and requirements of the fixed gas detection equipment and is the eq
order?
8.33 pet. Are the officers aware of the IMO requirements for COW and is the vessel complying with such requirements?
8.33 chem. Is the inert gas system including instrumentation, alarms, trips and pressure and oxygen recorders, in good ord
8.33 lpg. Are the officers’ familiar with the operation of the cargo conditioning (reliquefaction) plant and associated mach
instrumentation in good order?
8.33 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirements for setting fixed gas detector sample points and, are they fitted at the
the machinery spaces?
8.34 pet. If the vessel is Crude Oil Washing, has the COW system been tested for integrity, appropriate checks complete an
COW equipment in good operational order?
8.34 chem. Was the fixed oxygen analyser calibrated immediately prior to use of the inert gas system and do local and rem
pressure recorders, where fitted agree?
8.34 lpg. Are the crew aware of the hazards of the cargo compressor and motor rooms and are they clean and free of com
material?
8.34 lng. If applicable, are the officers’ familiar with the operation of the cargo reliquefaction plant and is the plant and as
machinery and instrumentation in good order?
8.35 pet. Is the tank cleaning heater, where fitted, effectively isolated from the crude oil washing line and any hydrant-typ
the crude oil washing lines securely sealed?
8.35 chem. Is the liquid level in the deck seal at the correct level, clearly visible and are officers aware of requirements to
the level?
8.35 lpg. Are the bulkhead seals between the compressor room and the motor room gas tight and well lubricated?
8.35 lng. Are the officers aware if the Gas supply to the Engine Room is unaffected by ESD Shutdown and are there proced
this?
8.35 lng. Are the officers aware if the Gas supply to the Engine Room is unaffected by ESD Shutdown and are there proced
this?
8.36 pet. Are records maintained of previous COW operations?
8.36 chem. Does the P/V breaker appear to be in good order?
8.36 lpg. Is the compressor room free of gas leaks?
8.36 lng. Is the reliquefaction plant fitted with an independent emergency shutdown control to the cargo ESD system.
8.37 pet. Are deck officers aware of the precautions necessary to avoid static discharge including maximum flow rates and
for flammable cargoes in non-inert tanks?
8.37 pet. Are deck officers aware of the precautions necessary to avoid static discharge including maximum flow rates and
for flammable cargoes in non-inert tanks?
8.37 chem. If the vessel is provided with a nitrogen generator / bottle manifold system, are the officers and crew aware of
hazards associated with nitrogen gas?
8.37 lpg. Is the compressor room well-lit and are electrical fittings suitable for use in gas-hazardous areas and in good orde
8.37 lng. Are the officers aware of the operation of the GCU unit where fitted and is the unit in fully operational and ready
use?
8.38 pet. Are officers aware if the vessel is fitted with full depth sounding pipes, is this information clearly displayed and ar
of the additional precautions relating to cargo tanks that are not fitted with full depth pipes?
8.38 chem. Are officers and ratings aware of safe entry requirements for the inert gas room(s), are these procedures being
where applicable, is fixed oxygen detection provided?
8.38 lpg. Are officers aware of the requirements for the compressor room ventilation system and is the system maintainin
relative pressure
8.38 lng. Are the alarms associated with the GCU tested in accordance with the Planned Maintenance System?
8.39 pet. Are precautions followed for metal tapes, gauging or sampling devices and portable tank cleaning equipment (as
before being introduced into tanks
8.39 pet. Are precautions followed for metal tapes, gauging or sampling devices and portable tank cleaning equipment (as
before being introduced into tanks
8.39 chem. Are the officers’ familiar with the dangers associated with over pressurisation of the cargo tanks and are proce
implemented to avoid over pressure due to purging, blowing and pigging with nitrogen?
8.39 lpg. Are officers aware of the requirements for the motor room ventilation system and is the system maintaining rela
pressure and operating satisfactorily?
8.39 lng. Are the officers aware of the gas fuel piping protection and is the system in good order?
8.39 lng. Are the officers aware of the gas fuel piping protection and is the system in good order?
8.40 pet. Are deck officers aware of the hazards associated with tank cleaning after the carriage of volatile products and th
the free fall of liquid into tanks?
8.40 pet. Are deck officers aware of the hazards associated with tank cleaning after the carriage of volatile products and th
8.40 chem. Are the officers aware of the primary and secondary cargo tank venting systems and are the systems functioni
8.40 lpg. Are the officers aware of the requirements for airlocks, are the alarms in good order and in the event of pressure
lost, will the shutdown system operate correctly?
8.40 lng. Is the automatic gas shut-off system in good order and regularly tested?
8.40 lng. Is the automatic gas shut-off system in good order and regularly tested?
8.41 pet. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipelin
gauges fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.41 pet. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipelin
gauges fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.41 chem. Are the P/V valves in good order, inspected and cleaned as part of a regular planned maintenance routine and
to support this?
8.41 lpg.Are the officers’ familiar with the operation and requirements of the fixed gas detection equipment and is the eq
order
8.41 lpg.Are the officers’ familiar with the operation and requirements of the fixed gas detection equipment and is the eq
order
8.41 lng. Is the interbarrier space nitrogen purging system in good order?
8.42 pet. If the vessel is fitted with vapour return manifolds, are they in good order including those for SBM use as approp
8.42 chem. Are the officers aware of the additional precautions operating with a vapour return line connected and are ap
procedures in place?
8.42 lpg. Are the officers aware of the requirements for setting fixed gas detector sample points and, where applicable are
appropriate level for the cargo being carried?
8.42 lpg. Are the officers aware of the requirements for setting fixed gas detector sample points and, where applicable are
appropriate level for the cargo being carried?
8.42 lng. Is the pressure in the interbarrier spaces being maintained at a sufficient level to prevent ingress from the atmos
8.43 pet. Does the vessel's piping system appear to be free of unauthorised inter-connections between cargo, bunker and
8.43 chem. Are deck officers aware of the precautions necessary to avoid static discharge including maximum flow rates a
periods for flammable cargoes in non-inert tanks?
8.43 chem. Are deck officers aware of the precautions necessary to avoid static discharge including maximum flow rates a
periods for flammable cargoes in non-inert tanks?
8.43 lpg. Where Ethylene Oxide and Propylene Oxide cargoes maybe carried are the officers aware of the isolation require
compressors and, if applicable are the compressors isolated at the time?
8.43 lpg. Where Ethylene Oxide and Propylene Oxide cargoes maybe carried are the officers aware of the isolation require
compressors and, if applicable are the compressors isolated at the time?
8.43 lng.Are officers aware of the setting requirements for relief valves for hold spaces and primary and secondary barrier
fitted are they in good order?
8.44 per. On vessels with pump rooms and trunk spaces, are they free of evidence of significant leaks from machinery, pip
glands and instrumentation and bilges clean?
8.44 chem. Are officers aware if the vessel is fitted with full depth sounding pipes, is this information clearly displayed and
aware of the additional precautions relating to cargo tanks that are not fitted with full depth pipes?
8.44 lpg. Are the officers aware of the environmental control of the void spaces and are void space seals where fitted in go
environmental control of void spaces satisfactory?
8.44 lng.Are the officers’ familiar with the means to sample for ingress of water into the insulation spaces and are checks
8.45 pet. Are bulkhead seals gas tight and, if required, well lubricated?
8.45 chem. Are precautions followed for metal tapes, gauging or sampling devices and portable tank cleaning equipment
before being introduced into tanks?
8.45 chem. Are precautions followed for metal tapes, gauging or sampling devices and portable tank cleaning equipment
before being introduced into tanks?
8.45 lpg. Are officers’ familiar with the inspection requirements for the cargo tank insulation, where fitted, and is the insul
be in good condition?
8.45 lng. Is the glycol heating system in the void spaces between cargo tanks, where fitted, in good order?
8.46 pet. Is the pump room gas monitoring system in good order, regularly checked and are officers aware of the alarm se
8.46 chem.Are deck officers aware of the hazards associated with tank cleaning after the carriage of volatile products and
8.46 lpg. Are officers aware of the setting requirements for relief valves for void spaces, hold spaces and primary and seco
and, where fitted are they in good order?
8.46 lng. Is the inert gas system and/or storage and associated pipework, where fitted, in good order?
8.47 pet. Is the bilge pump in good order and can it be operated from a position outside the pump room? T
8.47 pet. Is the bilge pump in good order and can it be operated from a position outside the pump room? T
8.47 chem. Are personnel aware of the hazards associated with steaming cargo tanks after the carriage of volatile product
8.47 chem. Are personnel aware of the hazards associated with steaming cargo tanks after the carriage of volatile product
8.47 lpg. Are the officers’ familiar with the monitoring requirements of the interbarrier spaces and are these regularly mo
results recorded?
8.47 lng. Are officers aware of the arrangements to prevent the backflow of cargo vapour into the inert gas system and is
in place?
8.48 pet. Is all lighting in the pumproom or trunk space operational and does it appear adequate to illuminate the space?
8.48 chem. Are cargo pipe joints bonded?
8.48 lpg. Are the relief valves for the hold spaces and primary and secondary barriers in good order?
8.48 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirements for setting the relief valves, are certificates of test available and clear
changing MARVS as applicable?
8.49 pet. If the vessel uses its own cargo hoses, are they in good order, pressure tested annually and is a record of all hose
inspections maintained on board?
8.49 chem. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipe
pressure gauges fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.49 chem. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipe
pressure gauges fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.49 lpg. Is there a means to sample for ingress of water into the interbarrier spaces provided and are checks being record
8.49 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the vent outlet arrangements and, as fitted are protective or flame screens in good
regularly inspected?
8.50 pet. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew a
maintenance requirements?
8.50 pet. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew a
8.50 chem. Is the vessel free of unauthorised inter-connections between cargo, bunker and ballast systems
8.50 lpg. Is the inert gas system and/or storage and associated pipework, where fitted, in good order?
8.50 lng. Where the pressure relief line vents directly through a mast riser, does this system have a liquid sensor?
8.50 lng. Where the pressure relief line vents directly through a mast riser, does this system have a liquid sensor?
8.51 pet. Are the officers and crew familiar with the requirements and risks during ship to ship operations?
8.51 chem. On vessels with pump rooms and trunk spaces, are they free of evidence of significant leaks from machinery, p
glands and instrumentation and are bilges clean?
8.51 lpg. Are officers aware of the arrangements to prevent the backflow of cargo vapour into the inert gas system and is
in place?
8.51 lng. Are officers’ familiar with the operation of any fixed fire extinguishing systems on the vent masts, where fitted, a
systems in good order and operational?
8.52 pet. Does the POAC have the necessary qualifications and experience and are officers aware of these requirements?
8.52 chem. Are bulkhead seals gas tight and, if required, well lubricated?
8.52 lpg. Are the officers aware of the requirements for setting the relief valves, are certificates of test available and clear
changing MARVS as applicable?
8.52 lng. Is the forward mast vent always operated in automatic mode?
8.53 pet. Are closed fairleads and mooring bitts provided?
8.53 chem. Is the pump room gas monitoring system in good order, regularly checked and are officers aware of the alarm
8.53 lpg. Are the officers’ familiar with the vent outlet arrangements and, as fitted are protective or flame screens in good
regularly inspected?
8.53 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the procedures and authorisation for changing settings and inhibiting alarms?
8.54 pet. Are officers aware of the requirements of the ship-to-ship transfer checklists and are there records of STS opera
8.54 pet. Are officers aware of the requirements of the ship-to-ship transfer checklists and are there records of STS opera
8.54 chem. Is the bilge pump in good order and can it be operated from a position outside the pump room?
8.54 lpg. Is there a liquid sensor in the liquid pressure relief valve collecting tank or, if not fitted, in the vent mast?
8.54 lng. Are officers’ familiar with the operation of the Emergency Shut Down (ESD) system, and is the system regularly te
operational?
8.55 pet. If a ship-to-ship transfer was in progress during the inspection, was it conducted in accordance with the recomm
OCIMF/ICS STS Transfer Guide?
8.55 chem. Are the officers aware of the requirements for the provision of protective equipment, is there adequate prote
onboard and in effective use?
8.55 lpg. Are officers’ familiar with the operation of any fixed fire extinguishing systems on the vent masts, where fitted, a
systems in good order and operational?
8.55 lng. Are personnel aware of the locations of ESD points, and auxiliary equipment shut down requirements?
8.56 pet. Are operator’s procedures provided and are records maintained for changing between the wet and dry modes?
8.56 chem. Are officers’ familiar with the safety equipment requirements of the IBC or BCH Code and is the safety equipm
accordance with the code in good order?
8.56 lpg. Are officers’ familiar with the operation of the Emergency Shut Down (ESD) system, and is the system regularly te
operational?
8.56 lng. Are the officers aware of the requirements for the closing of the manifold valves and tank filling valves, if they fo
emergency shutdown system, and are they tested and timed to close within 30 seconds?
8.57 pet. Have the senior deck officers had at least one years’ experience operating in wet service?
8.57 chem. Are the officers aware of the safe stowage requirements of the safety equipment and are these requirements
8.57 lpg. Are personnel aware of the locations of ESD points, and auxiliary equipment shut down requirements?
8.57 lng. Are officers aware of the requirements of fusible plugs, and are they fitted on the liquid domes, in the vicinity of
in good order?
8.58 pet. Are hatch covers of the dual seal type, are they seated correctly and are they sealed and gas tight?
8.58 chem. Has the breathing apparatus required by the IBC or BCH Codes examined by an expert agency annually, are th
with the onboard inspection requirements and is this logged accordingly?
8.58 lpg. Are officers aware of the requirements of fusible plugs, and are they fitted on the liquid domes, in the vicinity of
in good order?
8.58 lng. If the vessel is fitted with a reliquefaction plant, will this be tripped in the event of activation of the ESD?
8.59 pet. Are hatch covers free of visible evidence of damage and are the corners of hatch coamings and adjacent decks fr
cracks?
8.59 chem . Are the officers and ratings familiar with donning of the emergency escape sets where provided and are these
order?
8.59 lpg. Are cargo and vapour manifold arrangements satisfactory?
8.59 lng. Are the officers aware of the secondary tank pressure management system in use at sea and if it is sufficient to h
volume in the event of a shutdown of the reliquefaction system?
8.60 pet. Do records indicate that the pipe tunnel is clean and free of evidence of leakage?
8.60 chem. Does the Company preclude the use of filter type respirators onboard and are officers and ratings aware of the
requirements?
8.60 lpg. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipelin
gauges securely fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.60 lng. Are the officers fully familiar with the override procedure for the alarms and ESD trips?
8.61 pet. Are bilge pumping systems for forward spaces in good order?
8.61 chem. Are the crew aware of the locations and operation of the decontamination showers and eye-wash, and are the
8.61 lpg. Are the manifold valves and lines clearly marked as to whether they are liquid or vapour and are drains and purg
fitted valved and capped?
8.61 lng. Are the manifolds and associated valves in good order, blank flanges of an equivalent rating to that of the pipelin
gauges securely fitted outboard of the manifold valves on both sides and monitored for leakage?
8.62 pet. Is the vessel equipped with bilge alarms in the forward spaces and holds?
8.62 chem. If the vessel uses its own cargo hoses, are they in good order, pressure tested annually and is a record of all ho
inspections maintained on board?
8.62 lpg. Are officers aware of the procedures for the use of manifold strainers, and where fitted are the strainers not bein
8.62 lng. Does the manifold arrangement provide for safe access for connection and disconnection of cargo lines and visib
access to the manifolds during cargo operations?
8.63 pet. If the vessel uses portable hoses for crude oil washing, are these in good order and do records support that they
regularly tested.
8.63 chem. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels cre
8.63 chem. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels cre
8.63 lpg. Are liquid spill arrangements adequate, taking into account the lowest temperature cargoes which the vessel is c
8.63 lng. Is there clear evidence of offshore manifolds regularly checked during cargo transfer for manifold valve leakage?
8.64 pet. Do all key personnel on board involved in DP operations comply with the IMCA and UKOOA minimum requireme
experience and training?
8.64 pet. Do all key personnel on board involved in DP operations comply with the IMCA and UKOOA minimum requireme
experience and training?
8.64 lpg. Are crew members aware of the requirements for the use of protective equipment and is there suitable protecti
available and in use for all crew members engaged in cargo operations
8.64 lng. Are all flange connections fully bolted?
8.65 pet. Do DP personnel undergo assessed refresher training e.g. DP CAP?
8.65 pet. Do DP personnel undergo assessed refresher training e.g. DP CAP?
8.65 lpg. Are the officers’ familiar with the requirements for provision of safety equipment onboard, is the safety equipme
and are officers capable of donning the equipment satisfactorily?
8.65 lng. Are officers aware of the procedures for the use of manifold strainers, and where fitted are the strainers not bein
8.66 pet. Record the DP manning arrangement
8.66 lpg. Are crew members familiar with the requirements for personal protection for toxic products and donning of the
escape sets where provided?
8.66 lng. Are LNG spill arrangements adequate?
8.67 pet. Record the Engine Room manning arrangements during shuttle tanker operations
8.67 lpg. Are decontamination showers and an eye-wash, where required, provided in suitably marked locations and oper
8.67 lng. Are Liquid Spill and Manifold Drip tray arrangements adequate?
8.68 pet. Is there an Electronic Technician on-board with approved training on the maintenance of DP system?
8.68 pet. Is there an Electronic Technician on-board with approved training on the maintenance of DP system?
8.68 lpg. Are officers aware of the operation of the chemical dry powder system, and is the system in good order?
8.68 lng. During the disconnection of the loading arms are the crew aware of the hazards related to the purging of liquid f
the drain cocks?
8.69 pet. Have officers and ratings had shore-based training in helicopter handling operations?
8.69 lpg. Are the officers aware of the maintenance requirements for the water spray system and is the system in good or
8.69 lng. Are crew members aware of the requirements for the use of protective equipment and is there suitable protecti
available and in use for all crew members engaged in cargo operations?
8.70 pet. Does the vessel have on board a copy of the most recent FME(C)A?
8.70 lpg. Are the officers’ familiar with the fixed fire extinguishing systems installed within enclosed spaces containing car
equipment?
8.70 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the requirements for provision of safety equipment onboard, is the safety equipme
and are officers capable of donning the equipment satisfactorily?
8.71 pet. Do the failure modes meet IMO MSC Circ.645 with 'fail as set, or fail to zero'?
8.71 lpg. Is the safety equipment inspected on board monthly and are records available?
8.71 lng. If the vessel has a cargo capacity greater than 5,000 m3, is the additional firemen's outfit carried?
8.72 pet. Is a record of the DP proving trials available on board?
8.72 lpg. If the vessel uses its own cargo hoses, are they in good order, pressure tested annually to their design working pr
record of all hose tests and inspections maintained on board?
8.72 lng. Are officers aware of the operation of the chemical dry powder system, and is the system in good order?
8.73 pet. Have the recommendations (if any) from the DP proving trials been addressed?
8.73 lpg. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew
8.73 lpg. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew
8.73 lng. Are the officers aware of the maintenance requirements for the water spray system and is the system in good or
8.74 pet. Does the vessel have on board a copy of the most recent annual DP trial report (if required)?
8.74 lpg. Are operator's procedures provided for ship-to-ship operations?

8.74 lng. Are the officers’ familiar with the fixed fire extinguishing systems installed within enclosed spaces containing car
equipment?
8.75 pet. Have recommendations from the DP annual trial report been addressed and closed out as required?
8.75 lpg. Are the officers and crew familiar with the requirements and risks during ship to ship operations?
8.75 lng. If the vessel uses its own cargo hoses, are they in good order, pressure tested to their design working pressure an
all hose tests and inspections maintained on board?
8.76 pet. Are all personnel involved in DP operations familiar with the FME(C)A?
8.76 lng. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew
8.76 lpg. Does the POAC have the necessary qualifications and experience and are officers aware of these requirements?
8.76 lng. Are all cranes and other lifting equipment properly marked, regularly inspected, tested and are the vessels crew
8.77 pet. If modifications have been undertaken, has the FME(C)A been up-dated and the modifications proven by testing
8.77 lpg. Are sufficient closed fairleads and mooring bitts provided?
8.77 lng. Are operator's procedures provided for ship-to-ship operations and equipment approved for LNG transfer? Proce
follow the recommendations of the OCIMF/ICS STS Transfer Guide (Liquefied Gases).
8.78 pet. Have DP operations been incident-free in the last 12 months?
8.78 lpg. Are officers aware of the requirements of the ship-to-ship transfer checklists and are there records of STS operati
8.78 lng. Are the officers and crew familiar with the requirements and risks during ship to ship operations?
8.78 lng. Are the officers and crew familiar with the requirements and risks during ship to ship operations?
8.79 pet. Does the vessel have a DP Incident reporting system?
8.79 lpg. If a ship-to-ship transfer was in progress during the inspection, was it conducted in accordance with the recomm
8.79 lng. Does the POAC have the necessary qualifications and experience and are officers aware of these requirements?
8.80 pet. Does the vessel review the risk assessments for shuttle tanker operations prior to DP operations?
8.80 lng. Are officers aware of the requirements of the ship-to-ship transfer checklists and are there records of STS operati
8.80 lng. Are officers aware of the requirements of the ship-to-ship transfer checklists and are there records of STS operati
8.81 pet. Is the DP control console located so that the DPO can also observe the controls, the external environment and th
operations of the vessel?
8.81 lng. If a ship-to-ship transfer was in progress during the inspection, was it conducted in accordance with the recomm
8.82 pet. Are manual controls and emergency stops located within easy reach?
8.83 pet. What level of power/thrust can be achieved from the main propellers when going astern?
8.84 pet. Can the controls for position reference systems be accessed within easy reach of the DP control station?
8.85 pet. Does the vessel have a comprehensive DP operating manual on board?
8.86 pet. Are all personnel involved in DP operations familiar with the manual and demonstrate an understanding of its co
8.87 pet. Are checklists in place to cover bridge, engine room and electrical systems prior to DP operations?
8.88 pet. Are DP Capability Plots in place to cover the normal and expected operations?
8.89 pet. Are all the thrusters in good order?
8.90 pet. Is the Dynamic Positioning equipment on board in good order?
8.91 pet. Are all position reference systems in good order?
8.92 pet. Are the offsets adequately filed
8.93 pet. Does vessel have a data recorder that records all DP parameters?
8.94 pet. Is there a procedure for checking of the secure power supply systems prior to DP operations?
8.95 pet. If vessel is DP class 2 (or equivalent), does the DP system have a continuous analysis function checking that in te
power the vessel can maintain position after the worst_x0002_case failure?
8.96 pet. Do the operational procedures include guidance on number of generators to be running at different power loads
and engineers familiar with them?
8.97 pet. Are consequence analysis alarms used as input to the contingency matrix
8.98 pet. Is the DP system included within the Planned Maintenance System (PMS)?
8.99 pet. Are the appropriate loading terminal procedures manuals on board for each offshore terminal to which the vess
8.100 pet. Are deck officers familiar the appropriate loading terminal procedures manuals on board for each offshore term
vessel trades?
8.101 pet. Are weather forecasts received and assessed before commencing offshore operations?
8.102 pet. Are records of regular communications checks with the installation maintained?
8.103 pet. Is there a checklist for bridge or bow control station instrumentation and control systems and has it been corre
8.104 pet. Is there a checklist for engine room machinery and has it been correctly completed?
8.105 pet. Does the vessel apply the same practices when loading from the offshore terminal as for an onshore terminal?
8.106 pet. Are green line interlocks working satisfactorily
8.107 pet. Is there a service report available for the tension load cells?
8.108 pet. Is the deluge system in good order and is it pressurised during loading
8.108 pet. Is the deluge system in good order and is it pressurised during loading
8.109 pet. Are the emergency shut-down systems in good order and tested regularly?
8.110 pet. Is the telemetry system in good order?
8.111 pet. Has the BLS been subject to an FME(C)A process?
8.112 pet. Are the BLS and/or STL systems in good order
8.113 pet. Are checklists for the operation of the BLS and/or STL systems available and is there evidence of their consisten
8.114 pet. Are seals on the STL buoy hatch and the STL room watertight door in good order?
8.115 pet. Is the alarm for the STL room watertight door in good order and tested regularly
8.116 pet. Are indicators for closing devices in good order?
8.117 pet. Are BLS and/or STL areas fitted with detection/extinguishing systems and are they in good order
8.118 pet. Have communications been established and is there a backup communication system?
8.119 pet. Have communications been established with the field standby vessel?
8.120 pet. Are written emergency procedures for offshore loading provided?
8.121 pet. Are drills pertaining to these procedures held regularly?
8.122 pet. Is there a procedure for emergency towing?
8.123 pet. Are emergency towing trials carried out?
8.124 pet. Does the SOPEP address procedures specific to shuttle tanker operation?
8.125 pet. Are BLS and/or STL spaces free of oil
8.126 pet. If an oil discharge monitor is fitted in the STL room, is it in good order?
8.127 pet. Is the vessel equipped with an appropriate system for draining the BLS and/or STL spaces?
9.1 Are certificates available for all mooring lines and wires?
9.2 Does the ship have a Mooring System Management Plan?
9.3 Does the ship have a Line Management Plan?
9.4 Have the operator’s policies on line inspections, retirement and wear zone management been implemented as outline
Management Plan?
9.5 Do all mooring lines and where fitted, mooring tails, meet Industry guidelines?
9.6 If one or more bow stoppers are fitted, is a certificate attesting to the safe working load provided?
9.7 Is there a policy in place for the testing of winch brakes and are the results recorded?
9.8 Are moorings satisfactorily deployed and tended?
9.9 Are mooring lines secured to bitts and turned up correctly?
9.10 Are all powered mooring lines correctly reeled on drums, secured on brakes and winches out of gear
9.10 Are all powered mooring lines correctly reeled on drums, secured on brakes and winches out of gear
9.11 On split drum winches are all the lines made fast with no more than one layer on each tension side of the drum?
9.12 If mooring tails are fitted to wires or HMSF lines, do they have proper connections and are they correctly fitted?
9.13 Are all mooring lines stowed neatly to minimise tripping hazards and are mooring areas clear and unobstructed?
9.14 Are mooring winches, including winch foundations in good order?
9.15 Do brake linings, drums and pins appear to be in good order?
9.16 If mooring winches in a gas hazardous area are electrically powered, are motors Ex ‘d’ rated and have insulation tests
and the results recorded.
9.17 Are mooring wires, lines, synthetic tails and connecting apparatus in good order?
9.18 Are pedestal fairleads, roller fairleads and other rollers well-greased and free to turn and are bitts and chocks free of
9.19 Is mooring equipment marked with its SWL?
9.20 Are windlasses, anchors, locking bars and cables in good order and operating effectively?
9.21 Except whilst alongside, when locking bars should be in place, were the anchors cleared and ready for immediate use
entry?
9.22 Are bitter end securing arrangements unobstructed and outside the chain locker?
9.23 Are the chain locker doors securely battened down?
9.24 Is the crew aware of the design limitations of their anchor windlass and systems?
9.25 Is single point mooring (SPM) and associated equipment fitted to OCIMF recommendations?
9.26 If the vessel is equipped for mooring at single point moorings, does it meet the recommendations as applicable, conta
Equipment Guidelines?
9.27 If the vessel is fitted with a hydraulically operated bow stopper, are safeguards provided to prevent its accidental rele
9.27 If the vessel is fitted with a hydraulically operated bow stopper, are safeguards provided to prevent its accidental rele
9.28 Are emergency towing arrangements readily available for deployment at both ends of the vessel?
9.29 Does the vessel have on board Emergency Towing Procedures?
10.1 Are the engineers aware of the procedures for safe operation of the machinery plant including their duties and watch
instructions as per the Company SMS and are these instructions clearly defined?
10.2 If the machinery space is certified for unmanned operation is it being safely operated in that mode without regular al
under normal conditions?
10.2 If the machinery space is certified for unmanned operation is it being safely operated in that mode without regular al
under normal conditions?
10.3 Are the engineers demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the chief engineers standing orders and instructio
standing orders posted and signed by all engineers?
10.4 Are the engineers familiar with safe entry requirements to the machinery space when operating in the UMS mode, es
regards to use of the dead man alarm where fitted?
10.5 Are engineers aware of the entries required in the engine room log book, and are the entries clear, comprehensive an
maintained?
10.6 Can the engine room staff demonstrate full knowledge of essential emergency equipment and are instructions clearly
for safe operation?
10.7 Does the operator subscribe to a fuel, lube and hydraulic oil testing programme on a frequency in accordance with th
recommendations and are there procedures to act on these results?
10.7 Does the operator subscribe to a fuel, lube and hydraulic oil testing programme on a frequency in accordance with th
recommendations and are there procedures to act on these results?
10.8 Are the vessels staff engaged in bunkering operations well aware of safe transfer requirements and are detailed bunk
instructions available?
10.9 Are the engineers aware of the requirements for vessels operating within a ECA and are there clear procedures availa
of low sulphur fuels in boilers, main plant and auxiliary engines?
10.10 Are the engineers aware of the requirements and precautions necessary to control the change from residual to low-
are these requirements posted?
10.11 If the vessel is fitted with a class approved Exhaust Gas Cleaning System are the officers well familiar with the system
requirements and are these documented?
10.12 Are the officers’ familiar with the planned maintenance system and is the system being followed and maintained up
10.13 Is a Ship specific list of Critical equipment defined and available on board and highlighted in the PMS? Are there mea
ensure that defined critical spare parts are available on board?
10.14 Is an engineer's call alarm fitted and is it in good order and tested regularly and the results recorded?
10.14 Is an engineer's call alarm fitted and is it in good order and tested regularly and the results recorded?
10.15 Are all areas of the machinery space well illuminated, emergency escape routes clearly marked, unobstructed and a
familiar with the escape routes?
10.16 Are engineers aware of the testing requirements and able to demonstrate familiarity with the procedure for testing
equipment?
equipment?
equipment?
equipment?
equipment?
10.17 Are engineers aware of the operation of the machinery space liquid fuel system remote closing valves, and are the c
regularly tested and in good order?
10.17 Are engineers aware of the operation of the machinery space liquid fuel system remote closing valves, and are the c
regularly tested and in good order?
10.18 Are officers aware of the location of the accommodation and engine room ventilation fan emergency stops, are they
to indicate the spaces they serve and is there evidence of regular testing and maintenance?
10.19 Are diesel engine fuel delivery pipes adequately jacketed or screened, exhaust lines and hot surfaces protected from
surrounding areas free from fuel or lube oil leakage?
10.20 Are purifier rooms and fuel and lubricating oil handling areas ventilated and clean?
10.21 If the vessel class notation allows UMS operation, are main engine bearing temperature monitors, or the crankcase o
in good order?
10.22 Where hydraulic aggregate pumps are located within the main engine compartment, is an oil mist detector fitted?
10.23 Are the main switchboard, alternators and other electrical equipment satisfactorily protected from water spray?
10.24 Is deck insulation provided to the front and rear of medium power (i.e. 220V and above) electrical switchboards and
order?
10.25 Are gauge glass closing devices on oil tanks of a self-closing, fail-safe type and not inhibited
10.26 Are self-closing sounding devices to double bottom tanks in good order and closed
10.27 Is all moving machinery provided with effective guards and adequate eye protection available?
10.28 Are records maintained for the regular inspection and testing of lifting devices and loose gear? L
10.29 Are machinery spaces and steering compartments clean and free from obvious leaks and is the overall standard of h
fabric maintenance satisfactory?
10.30 Is the bilge high level alarm system regularly tested and are records maintained
10.31 Are seawater pumps, sea chests and associated pipework in good order and free of hard rust and temporary repairs
outboard of the ship-side valves?
10.32.1 The main engine;
10.32.1 The main engine;

10.32.2 Auxiliary engines and
generators, including shaft and
emergency generators where
fitted
10.32.2 Auxiliary engines and

generators, including shaft and
emergency generators where
fitted
10.32.3 Boilers, including waste heat and

domestic boilers;
10.32.3 Boilers, including waste heat and

domestic boilers;
10.32.4 Compressors including main,
instrument and emergency air
compressors;
10.32.4 Compressors including main,

instrument and emergency air
compressors;
10.32.5 Purifiers and fuel oil handling

equipment;
10.32.5 Purifiers and fuel oil handling

equipment;
10.32.6 Inert gas plant, including the
fans, scrubber, analyser and
valves;
10.32.6 Inert gas plant, including the

fans, scrubber, analyser and
valves;
10.32.7 Sewage plant;
10.32.7 Sewage plant;
10.32.8 Bilge pumping arrangements

and the oily water separator;
10.32.8 Bilge pumping arrangements

and the oily water separator;
10.32.9 Pipework, including steam, fuel,
lubricating oil, seawater,
sewage, drain and air pipes, etc
10.32.9 Pipework, including steam, fuel,

lubricating oil, seawater,
sewage, drain and air pipes, etc
10.32.10 Refrigeration and air
conditioning machinery;
10.32.10 Refrigeration and air

conditioning machinery;
10.32.11 Hydraulic aggregate pumps;
10.32.11 Hydraulic aggregate pumps;
10.32.12 Ventilation fans and trunking;
10.32.12 Ventilation fans and trunking;
10.32.13 Stern tube sealing arrangements;
10.32.13 Stern tube sealing arrangements;
10.32.14 Any other items of machinery,

including stand-by machinery
10.32.14 Any other items of machinery,

including stand-by machinery
10.32.15 Burners, tubes, uptakes, exhaust
manifolds and spark arrestors (If
fitted)
10.32.15 Burners, tubes, uptakes, exhaust

manifolds and spark arrestors (If
fitted)
10.32 Are the following, where applicable, all in good order and do they appear to be well maintained?
10.32 Are the following, where applicable, all in good order and do they appear to be well maintained?
10.33 Are engineers familiar with the procedure for taking over the controls for manoeuvring the vessel from the bridge in
10.34 Are officers fully familiar with all starting procedures for the emergency generator and are these procedures clearly
10.35 Is the emergency generator reserve fuel tank provided with sufficient fuel
10.36 Where an emergency generator is not fitted, are engine room emergency batteries in good order and fully charged?
10.37 Is all electrical equipment including junction boxes and cable runs in good order?
10.38 Are switchboards free of significant earth faults?
10.39 Are the officers aware of the test requirements for the steering gear both pre-departure and for emergency steering
these tests been conducted satisfactorily with operating instructions clearly posted?
10.39 Are the officers aware of the test requirements for the steering gear both pre-departure and for emergency steering
these tests been conducted satisfactorily with operating instructions clearly posted?
10.40 Is the steering gear emergency reserve tank fully charged
10.41 Are the arrangements for the provision of communications with the wheelhouse and heading and rudder indication
10.42 Is access to steering gear unobstructed
10.43 Is the steering compartment fitted with suitable handrails, gratings or other non-slip surfaces?
10.44 Are the officers and crew aware of the safe operating requirements of any watertight doors fitted?
10.45 Are detailed LNG bunkering and fuel handling instructions/manual available?
10.45 Are detailed LNG bunkering and fuel handling instructions/manual available?
10.46 Are risk assessments for LNG bunkering completed and available?
10.47 Are pre-bunkering checklists and verifications appropriately completed and carried out?
10.48 Does the vessel have appropriate emergency response plan and PPE relevant to LNG bunker operations?
10.49 Does the vessel have an established emergency bunkering shut-down procedure which is agreed upon with the pers
supply facility and is tested prior commencement of operations?
10.49 Does the vessel have an established emergency bunkering shut-down procedure which is agreed upon with the pers
supply facility and is tested prior commencement of operations?
10.50 Is information on loading limitations for the LNG fuel tanks available?
10.51 Are the appropriate ships personnel trained and certified in bunkering operations involving LNG as a marine fuel?
10.52 Are visible means provided to restrict access to the bunker manifold area during operations?
10.53 Are permanent fixed gas detection and alarms fitted at appropriate LNG bunkering manifold and vent areas and oth
locations?
10.54 Are appropriate cryogenic spill protection measures tested and deployed?
11.1 Is the general condition, visual appearance and cleanliness of the hull satisfactory
11.2 Are hull markings clearly indicated and correctly placed?
11.3 Is the general condition, visual appearance and cleanliness of the weather decks satisfactory and are deck working ar
identified and provided with non-slip surfaces?
11.4 Is the general condition of service pipework satisfactory and is it free from significant corrosion and pitting and soft pa
temporary repairs
11.5 Are pipe stands, clamps, supports and expansion arrangements satisfactory?
11.6 Are all deck openings, including weathertight doors, bridge windows and portholes, in good order and capable of bein
secured?
secured?
secured?
11.7 Are fuel, ballast and other space vents and air pipes in good order and does visual evidence indicate regular maintena
11.8 Is the general condition, visual appearance and cleanliness of the superstructure satisfactory?
11.9 Are the deck lights all operational and sufficient in number and range to illuminate the deck to facilitate safe working
11.10 Is the general condition of electrical equipment, including conduits and wiring, satisfactory?
11.11 Are light fittings in gas-hazardous areas Ex 'd' rated and in good order?
11.12 Are forecastle stores free of water, internal spaces and storerooms clean, free from debris and tidy
11.13 Are accommodation, public spaces, sanitary areas, food store handling spaces, refrigerated spaces, galleys and pant
illuminated, clean, tidy, in a hygienic condition and obstruction free?
illuminated, clean, tidy, in a hygienic condition and obstruction free?
11.14 Are laundries free of accumulations of clothing that could constitute a fire hazard
11.15 If fitted, is the Ship's Hospital clean and tidy and ready for use?
11.16 Is the condition of electrical equipment in the accommodation satisfactory
11.17 Are personnel alarms in refrigerated spaces in good order and operational?
12.1 Are procedures available for operations in ice or Polar Waters?
12.2 Are means in place to detect ice?

12.3 Are systems in place for the routine receipt of navigational, meteorological and environmental data including ice data
satellite images?
12.4 Has training specifically addressing navigation in ice or Polar Waters been provided to members of the vessel’s compl
accordance with STCW Section A-V/4?
12.5 Are means in place on at least one main engine sea water chest to prevent its freezing or clogging?
12.6 Are procedures available for operations in sub-zero temperatures?
12.7 Are means and/or procedures in place to protect personnel from exposure to sub-zero temperatures?
12.8 Are means provided to maintain accommodation spaces at a temperature suitable for habitation?
12.9 Are means and procedures in place to ensure safe access and movement about the vessel in sub-zero conditions?
12.10 Are means in place to prevent the icing of wheelhouse windows?
12.11 Are radars fitted that are of a type classed as being suitable for operation in sub-zero temperatures?
12.12 Are means and/or procedures in place to ensure that air driven whistles and fog horns are operable at sub-zero tem
12.13 Are means and/or procedures in place to ensure the operability of critical equipment and systems in sub-zero air tem
12.14 Are means and/or procedures in place aimed at ensuring the ready availability of life saving appliances?
12.15 Are means and/or procedures in place aimed at ensuring the operability of fire-fighting systems?
12.15 Are means and/or procedures in place aimed at ensuring the operability of fire-fighting systems?
12.16 Are means and/or procedures in place to ensure the proper functioning of air intakes and fire flaps?
12.17 Are means and/or procedures in place to protect piping systems on deck from the risk of freezing?
12.17 Are means and/or procedures in place to protect piping systems on deck from the risk of freezing?
12.18 Are means and/or procedures in place to ensure the operability of ballast systems and any drenching systems at sea
-2˚C and sub-zero air temperatures?
12.19 Are means or procedures in place to prevent the icing up of cargo tank primary and secondary venting arrangement
12.20 Are means and/or procedures in place to prevent the icing up of air pipes to settling and service tanks required for t
the main propulsion plant and essential auxiliaries?
12.21 Has training specifically addressing operations in sub-zero temperatures and/or Polar water area and PWOM been p
vessel’s complement?
12.21 Has training specifically addressing operations in sub-zero temperatures and/or Polar water area and PWOM been p
vessel’s complement?
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
No VIQ7 question
ers in good operational order in suitably marked locations?
ll illuminated, clean, tidy, in a hygienic condition and obstruction free?

SIRE 2.0 To VIQ7 - Comparative Analysis - Version 1.0 (January 2022)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SIRE 2.0 To VIQ7 - Comparative Analysis - Version 1.0 (January 2022)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Interelationship between SIRE 2.

0 and VIQ7 questions

To find the SIRE 2.0 question(s) that relate to a VIQ7 question:

1) Select the filter on the VIQ7 Questions column

2) Click on "Select All" to remove this selection

3) Type in the VIQ7 question number in the Search Box

4) Select the question you are interested in and press OK

To find the VIQ7 question(s) that relate to a SIRE 2.0 question:

11.1.x Photograph comparison

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - predominantly a commercial matter

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - predominantly a commercial matter

11.1.x Photograph comparison

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - no supporting industry references to this found

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - no supporting industry references to this found

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - obsolete

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - obsolete

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - information gathering only

0.0.0 No SIRE 2.0 question - information gathering only

11.1.x Photograph comparison

11.1.x Photograph comparison

11.1.x Photograph comparison

11.1.x Photograph comparison

1.15 Vessel’s operation at the time of the inspection

1.21 Date of the last port State control inspection

1.22 Port of the last Port State Control inspection

1.23 Name of Classification society:

1.24 Date of expiry of the Class Certificate

2.1.1 Certificate of Registry

2.1.2 Continuous Synopsis Record

2.1.3 Document of Compliance (DoC)

2.1.5 Safety Equipment Certificate, supplemented by Form E

2.1.6 Safety Radio Certificate, supplemented by Form

2.1.7 Safety Construction Certificate

2.1.8 IOPP Certificate, supplemented by Form A or B

2.1.10 Minimum Safe Manning Document

2.1.11 Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of Chemicals or Gas

2.1.12 Noxious Liquid Substances (NLS) Certificate

2.1.13 Civil Liability Convention Certificate(s)

2.1.14 Maritime Labour Convention (2006)

2.1.15 Ballast Water Management Certificate.

2.2 Is the vessel's P and I Club a member of the International Group?

3.3 Are all personnel able to communicate effectively in a common language?

4.7.2 A Navtex receiver.

4.7.3 A whistle, bell and gong.

4.7.5 A properly adjusted standard magnetic compass

4.7.6 A steering magnetic compass

4.7.7 Means for taking bearings

4.7.8 A spare magnetic compass.

4.7.10 A daylight signalling lamp

4.7.11 An automatic identification system (AIS).

4.7.12 A VHF radio.

4.7.13 A gyro compass and repeaters.

4.7.14 Visual compass readings to the emergency steering position

4.7.16 Radar plotting equipment

4.7.17 An echo sounder.

4.7.18 A speed and distance indicator

4.7.20 Radar installations.

4.7.22 A rate of turn indicator.

4.7.24 A Navtex receiver.

4.7.25 A whistle, bell and gong.

4.7.27 A properly adjusted magnetic compass.

4.7.28 A pelorus or compass bearing device