CHAPTER – IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:

This is the simplest way to analysis different types of data in this method percentage rate of
each data was found that and with respect to total and with the help of the percentage (%) rate
the analysing the data was carried out.

Data analysis and interpretation is an attempt to organize and summarize in order to increase
results usefulness in such a manner that enables the researcher to relate critical points with
the study objectives. Sometimes the organising and summarising of data require the uses of
statistical measures such as percentages.

In this industrial project percentage is used to make comparison between two or more than
series of data. It is used to describe the relationships. But when the percentages are used, it
becomes very easy to find the relative difference in the distribution.
 TABLE 4.1

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

GENDER NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Male 53 42.4
Female 71 56.8
Other 1 0.8
Total 125 100

Source: primary Data

INTERPRETATION:

In the above table shows that 42.4% of the respondents are male , 56.8% of the
respondents are Female and 0.8% of the respondents are other.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (56.8%) of the respondents are gender of

Female.
 EXHIBIT:4.1

GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS

 TABLE 4.2

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

AGE NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

18 - 25 12 9.6%

25 - 40 66 52.8%

40 - 55 40 32%

MORE THAN 55 7 4.8%

TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION:

In the above table, 9.6% of the respondents belong to the age

group of 18 - 25 years, 52.8% of the respondents belong to the age group of 25 -
40 years, 32% of the respondents belong to the age group of 40 - 55 years ,
4.8% of the respondents belongs to the age of more than 55 years .

Thus, it is inferred that majority (52.8%) of the respondents are age group of 25 - 40
years.
 EXHIBIT:4.2

AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

TABLE 4.3
 NUMBER OF YEARS HAVE BEEN WORKING IN ARSS POLYMERS

NO OF YAERS NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

LESS THAN A 5 4
YEAR
1 - 3 YEARS 22 39.2
3 - 7 YEARS 49 39.2
MORE THAN 7 49 17.6
YEARS
TOTAL 125 100
Source: primary Data

INTERPRETATION:

The above table reveals that, 4% of the respondents works less than a
year , 39.2% respondents works 1 – 3 years , 39.2% of the respondents works 3
– 7 years and 17.6% of the respondents works more than 7 years

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (39.2%) of the Respondents are both

1– 3 years and 3 – 7 years.
 EXHIBIT:4.3

NUMBER OF YEARS HAVE BEEN WORKING IN ARSS POLYMERS

 TABLE 4.4

SATISFACTION OF BENEFITS OFFERED

OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

HIGHLY SATISFIED 51 40.8

SATISFIED 46 36.8

NEUTRAL 14 11.2

DISSATISFIED 10 8

HIGHLY 4 3.2
DISSATISFIED
TOTAL 100 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is observed from the table 4.4 that (40.8%) of the respondents are highly satisfied
with the benefits ,(36.8%) of the respondents are satisfied with the benefits ,
(11.2%) of the respondents are neutral with the benefits , (8%) of the respondents
are dissatisfied with the benefits and (3.2%) of the respondents are highly
dissatisfied with the benefits.

Thus, it is inferred that majority (40.8%) of the respondents are highly

satisfied with the benefits offered.
 EXHIBIT 4.4

SATISFACTION OF BENEFITS OFFERED

 TABLE 4.5

RECGONIZE AND ACKNOWLEGE THE WORK OF

EMPLOYEES

OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
STRONGLY 66 52.8
AGREE
AGREE 42 33.6
NEUTRAL 12 9.6
DISAGREE 5 4.0
STRONGLY 0 0
DISAGREE
TOTAL 125 100
Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

The above table shows that a majority52.8% of respondents strongly agree,

33.6% of the respondents are agree, 9.6% of the respondents are neutral, 4% of
the respondents are disagree and none of the respondents are strongly disagree.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (52.8%) of the respondents strongly agree

that there is a recogonisation and acknowledgement of work in ARSS
POLYMERS.
 EXHIBIT 4.5

RECGONIZE AND ACKNOWLEGE THE WORK OF

EMPLOYEES
 TABLE 4.6

SATISFACTION WITH WORK ROLE

OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

HIGHLY SATISFIED 51 40.8

SATISFIED 61 48.8

NEUTRAL 9 7.2

DISSATISFIED 2 1.6

HIGHLY 2 1.6
DISSATISFIED
TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is observed from the table 4.6 that (40.8%) of the respondents are highly satisfied with the
work role ,(48.8%) of the respondents are satisfied with the work role , (7.2%) of the
respondents are neutral with the work role , (1.6%) of the respondents are dissatisfied with
the work role ,(1.6%) of the respondents are highly dissatisfied with the work role.

Thus, it is inferred that majority (48.8%) of the respondents are satisfied

with the work role.

.
 EXHIBIT 4.6

SATISFACTION WITH WORK ROLE

TABLE: 4.7
 FACTORS MOTIVATING THE EMPLOYEES

FACTORS NO.OF. RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

MOTIVATING

SALARY INCREASE 44 35.2

PROMOTION 52 41.6

LEAVE 13 10.4

MOTIVATIONAL TALK 13 10.4

RECOGNITION 3 2.4

TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is clear from the study that 35.2% of respondents provide importance to

salary increase, 41.6% of the respondents provide importance to fuel promotion,
10.4% of the respondents provide importance to leave and motivational talk and
only 2.4% of respondents provide importance to recognition.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (41.6%) of the respondents provide

importance to promotion.

EXHIBIT: 4.7
FACTORS MOTIVATING THE EMPLOYEES

TABLE 4.8
 SATISFACTION WITH EXECUTIVES AND MANAGEMENT
GROUP

OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

HIGHLY SATISFIED 55 44

SATISFIED 49 39.2

NEUTRAL 13 10.4

DISSATISFIED 5 4

HIGHLY 3 2.4
DISSATISFIED
TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is observed from the table 4.8 that (44%) of the respondents are highly satisfied with the
executive and the management group ,(39.2%) of the respondents are satisfied with the
executive and the management group , (10.4%) of the respondents are neutral with the
executive and the management group, (4%) of the respondents are dissatisfied with the
executive and the management group,(2.4%) of the respondents are highly dissatisfied with
the executive and the management group.

Thus, it is inferred that majority (48.8%) of the respondents are satisfied

with the work role.

EXHIBIT 4.8

SATISFACTION WITH EXECUTIVES AND MANAGEMENT

GROUP
 TABLE 4.9

OVERALL ENVIRONMENT DURING WORK

ENVIRONMENT NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

 ENERGITIC 56 44.8

FOCUSED 49 39.2

HAPPY 13 10.4

CALMING 3 2.4

PARTICIPATIVE 4 3.2

TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is clear from the study that 44.8% of respondents says that the
environment is energetic,39.2% of the respondents says that the environment is
focused, 10.4% of the respondents says that the environment is happy, 2.4% of
the respondents says that the environment is calming, 3.2% of the respondents
says that the environment is participative.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (44.8%%) of the respondents says

that the environment is energetic.

EXHIBIT: 4.9

OVERALL ENVIRONMENT DURING WORK

 TABLE 4.10

RECOMMENDING THIS COMPANY AS AN EMPLOYER TO

FRIENDS.

OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE
 RESPONDENTS
STRONGLY 61 48.8
AGREE
AGREE 37 29.6
NEUTRAL 18 14.4
DISAGREE 8 6.4
STRONGLY 10 0.8
DISAGREE
TOTAL 125 100
Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

The above table shows that a majority 48.8% of respondents strongly agree,
29.6% of the respondents are agree, 14.4% of the respondents are neutral, 6.4%
of the respondents are disagree and 0.8% of the respondents are strongly
disagree.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (48.8%) of the respondents strongly agree

that they recommending this company as an employer to their friends.

EXHIBIT 4.10

RECOMMENDING THIS COMPANY AS AN EMPLOYER TO

FRIENDS.
 TABLE 4.11

COMFORTABLE AND HEALTHY WORK-LIFE BALANCE.

OPINION NO OF PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS
 STRONGLY 56 44.8
AGREE
AGREE 49 39.2
NEUTRAL 13 10.4
DISAGREE 4 3.2
STRONGLY 3 2.4
DISAGREE
TOTAL 125 100
Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

The above table shows that a majority 44.8% of respondents strongly agree,
39.2% of the respondents are agree, 10.4% of the respondents are neutral, 3.2%
of the respondents are disagree and 2.4% of the respondents are strongly
disagree.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (44.8%) of the respondents strongly agree

that they are comfortable and healthy with their work-life balance.

EXHIBIT 4.11

COMFORTABLE AND HEALTHY WORK-LIFE BALANCE.

 TABLE 4.12

SATISFACTION WITH THE WORKING HOURS.

 OPINION NO. OF. RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

Yes 79 63.2

No 31 24.8

Maybe 15 12

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

From the above table we can able to know that 63.2% of the respondents
satisfied with the working hours, 24.8% of the respondents are not satisfied with
the working hours and 12% of the respondents may or may not satisfied with
the working hours.

Thus it is inferred that Majority (63.2%) of the respondents satisfied with

the working hours.

EXHIBIT:4.12

SATISFACTION WITH THE WORKING HOURS.

 TABLE 4.13

SATISFACTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE MEASURED.

 NO. OF.
OPINION PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

Yes 86 68.8

No 29 23.2

Maybe 10 8

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

From the above table we can able to know that 68.8% of the respondents
satisfied with the performance measured, 23.2% of the respondents are not
satisfied with the performance measured and 8% of the respondents may or may
not satisfied with the performance measured.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (68.8%) of the respondents satisfied with

the performance measured.

EXHIBIT:4.13

SATISFACTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE MEASURED.

 TABLE 4.14

COUNSELING PROGRAMS FOR EMPLOYEES.

 NO. OF.
OPINION PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

Yes 86 68.8

No 24 19.2

Maybe 15 12

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

From the above table we can able to know that 68.8% of the respondents
satisfied with the counselling programs, 19.2% of the respondents are not
satisfied with the counselling programs and 12% of the respondents may or may
not satisfied with the counselling programs.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (68.8%) of the respondents satisfied with

the counselling programs.

EXHIBIT:4.14

COUNSELING PROGRAMS FOR EMPLOYEES.

 TABLE 4.15

NECESSARY AUTHORITY TO PERFORM DUTIES.

 NO. OF.
OPINION PERCENTAGE
RESPONDENTS

Yes 72 57.6

No 29 23.2

Maybe 24 19.2

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

From the above table we can able to know that 57.6% of the respondents
satisfied with necessary authority to perform duties, 23.2% of the respondents
are not satisfied with the necessary authority to perform duties and 19.2% of the
respondents may or may not satisfied with necessary authority to perform
duties.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (57.6%) of the respondents satisfied with

the necessary authority to perform duties.

EXHIBIT:4.15

NECESSARY AUTHORITY TO PERFORM DUTIES.

 TABLE 4.16

RATE THE WORK ENVIRONMENT ETHICS

RATE NO.OF. RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

 1 6 4.8

2 12 9.6

3 29 23.2

4 42 33.6

5 36 28.8

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION
From the above table we can able to know that 4.8% of the respondents rate -1 to the
work environment ethics, 9.6% of the respondents rate -2 to the work environment
ethics,23.2% of the respondents rate -3 to the work environment ethics,33.6% of the
respondents rate -4 to the work environment ethics,28.8% of the respondents rate -5 to the
work environment ethics.
Thus, it is inferred that Majority (33.6%) of the respondents rate - 4 to the work
environment ethics.
EXHIBIT4.16

RATE THE WORK ENVIRONMENT ETHICS

 TABLE 4.17

EVENLY WORK IS DISTRIBUTED.

 RATE NO.OF. RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

1 8 6.4

2 17 13.6

3 24 24

4 28 24.4

5 48 38.4

Total 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION
From the above table we can able to know that 6.4% of the respondents rate -1 for
evenly work is distributed, 13.6% of the respondents rate -2 for evenly work is
distributed,24% of the respondents rate -3 for evenly work is distributed cs,24.4% of the
respondents rate -4 for evenly work is distributed,38.4% of the respondents rate -5 for evenly
work is distributed.

Thus, it is inferred that Majority (38.4%) of the respondents rate -5 for evenly work is
distributed.
EXHIBIT4.17

EVENLY WORK IS DISTRIBUTED.

 TABLE 4.18

OVERALL SATISFACTION OF ARSS POLYMERS.

OPINION NO OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

HIGHLY SATISFIED 67 53.6

 SATISFIED 42 33.6

NEUTRAL 12 9.6

DISSATISFIED 2 1.6

HIGHLY 2 1.6
DISSATISFIED
TOTAL 125 100

Source: primary data

INTERPRETATION

It is observed from the table 4.8 that (53.6%) of the respondents are highly satisfied with the
overall performance of Arss Polymers, (33.6%) of the respondents are satisfied with the
overall performance of Arss Polymers, (9.6%) of the respondents are neutral with the e
overall performance of Arss Polymers, (1.6%) of the respondents are dissatisfied with overall
performance of Arss Polymers, (1.6%) of the respondents are highly dissatisfied overall
performance of Arss Polymers .

Thus, it is inferred that majority (53.6%) of the respondents highly satisfied with the
overall performance of Arss Polymers.

EXHIBIT 4.18

OVERALL SATISFACTION OF ARSS POLYMERS.