This document defines and provides examples of logical fallacies, which are flawed or erroneous reasoning in arguments. Some of the logical fallacies discussed include appeals to authority, which claim something is true because an expert says so; bandwagon appeals, which argue something is true because many people believe it; and circular reasoning, which repeats an argument without proving it. The document stresses that logical fallacies make arguments based on incorrect assumptions rather than valid logic or evidence.
This document defines and provides examples of logical fallacies, which are flawed or erroneous reasoning in arguments. Some of the logical fallacies discussed include appeals to authority, which claim something is true because an expert says so; bandwagon appeals, which argue something is true because many people believe it; and circular reasoning, which repeats an argument without proving it. The document stresses that logical fallacies make arguments based on incorrect assumptions rather than valid logic or evidence.
This document defines and provides examples of logical fallacies, which are flawed or erroneous reasoning in arguments. Some of the logical fallacies discussed include appeals to authority, which claim something is true because an expert says so; bandwagon appeals, which argue something is true because many people believe it; and circular reasoning, which repeats an argument without proving it. The document stresses that logical fallacies make arguments based on incorrect assumptions rather than valid logic or evidence.
- An appeal that is claiming that something must be true because it is believed by someone who said to be an
“authority” on the subject.
- As a CRITIC - Believed that an examination of beliefs or thoughts provides us with opportunity to know ourselves better - Contrary to a lover of wisdom - Ex. A commercial claims that a specific brand of cereal is the best way to stat the day because athlete Michael Jordan says that it is what he eats every day for breakfast. - Ex. At least 70% of all Americans support restrictions on access to abortions. - Ex. Church should begin at 11am because that’s what the time that we have always begun the church service. - Ex. Don’t believe what Martha said on education, she was not even a graduate of PNU. - Ex. He was not guilty since no one saw him commit the crime. - Ex. John started going to church more often, then won the lottery; therefore, God is rewarding his faithfulness. - Ex. Since I am the boss, you must vote for my candidate or else I will fire you from your job. - Ex. Since I saw them together then they must be lovers. - Ex. Slavery is right because most people own slaves. - Ex. Tell 'em what you're gonna tell 'em, then tell 'em, and then tell 'em what you told 'em. - Ex. The Bible is true, so you should not doubt the Word of God. - Ex. We should not fail poor students for they may not acquire the education that will help them to overcome their poverty. - IGNORANCE of the law, excuses?? - Is an idea which many people believe to be true, but which is in fact false because it is based on incorrect - Is essential because we do not realize what we truly believe in until are challenged to defend them - occurs when someone incorrectly assumes a relationship between two things. - occurs when the end of an argument comes back to the beginning without having proven itself. - Refers to someone who reasons poorly - Required those he converse to THINK, to DEFEND THEIR VIEWS, to ACCOUNT FOR WHAT THEY KNOW and DO NOT KNOW - This erroneous kind of reasoning is called FALLACY - this fallacy is the attempt to prove something by showing how many people think that it's true. - this is the fallacy of trying to prove something by saying it again and again. - This uses moral, psychological, cultural or physical pressure/threat instead of reason in its argument - Using historical preferences of the people (tradition), either in general or as specific as the historical preferences of a single individual, as evidence that the historical preference is correct. - When compassion or pity is being used to obscure the issue - when the argument concludes even if there is insufficient data to establish a valid sequence when what is true to a few is made true to all. - When the personality of the opponent is attacked when it has nothing to do with the issue. - when the popular sentiments of the majority or those that counts are made the basis of the conclusion. This makes use of the bandwagon argument. - When the truth or falsity of an issue is asserted because no one can offer proof of its contradictory - You must obey the law, because it’s illegal to break the law.