Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Result%: M M D D
Result%: M M D D
RESULT%
Student number(s):
x
Surname and initials:
Module code: M M M 1 2 A
Graduate None 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Attribute (GA)
assessment:
Practical/number: 1
Practical name MOMENT OF INERTIA
Group number:
Due date: 2 0 2 2 M M D D
Lecturer:
I, , STUDENT
NUMBER , HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE
CONTENT OF THIS ASSIGNMENT/PROJECT IS MY OWN WORK, AS DEFINED AND
CONSTITUTED IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF
TECHNOLOGY, FREE STATE (PLEASE CONSULT THE PROGRAMME GUIDE OF THE
DEPARTMENT).
SIGNED:
DATE:
2|Page
DATE:
GROUP NUMBER:
STUDENT NUMBER:
SIGNATURE:
SUBJECT:
PRACTICAL:
3|Page
Table of Contents
List of SI Units
Gravitational g Newton N
force
Angular w Radian per second Rad/s
Acceleration
Radius r
Height h meter m
5|Page
Introduction
Our objective in this experiment is to investigate the moment of inertia and
rotational inertia in this experiment. In order to understand the topic of this
practical, I will first explain some of the theory behind it. As I draw the
apparatus, I will describe how each one works. For my purpose, I will
demonstrate how to calculate the flywheel's moment of inertia followed by
calculation instructions for method 2 in the practical guide. I will then gather
data about its experimental value and then tabulate it. I will compare the
results and further explain the differences and conclude based on all the
information that was done in the experiment.
In the following figures 1 and figure 2 it shows a clear example on how the
practical will be demonstrated.
6|Page
Aim
First, the primary goal of the experiment is to understand the theory concepts
of rotational kinetic energy, linear velocity, and moments of inertia.
Furthermore, it aims to calculate the moments of inertia theoretically and
experimentally, and compare the results of the outcome.
Theory
Parallel Theorem
This theorem states that moment of inertia of a body about an axis Y/ parallel
to another axis Y is equal to the sum of Moment of inertia about axis Y plus
the product of the mass and the squared distance between the axis.y/
7|Page
Radius of Gyration
The radius of gyration is defined as the distance from the axis of rotation to
the point where the whole mass of a body is supposed to be concentrated.
This should give the same moment of inertia as that of the original shape.
By the symbol k, we denote the radius of gyration.
As per the definition of the radius of gyration, the moment of inertia of the
body (In figure A) is equal to the moment of inertia of concentrated point
mass (In figure B) about the same axis.
8|Page
k= radius of gyration
𝟏 𝟐
𝒌= 𝑰𝒘
𝟐
Procedure
1. Measure the size of the flywheel a to verify if they are the same as shown
in the lab guide.
2. The mass hanger's weight and rope thickness will be given.
3. Weights to be used for the experiment was instructed by the lecture they
are 2kg and 4kg.
4. Use the rope to wind around the shaft of the flywheel and measure the
effective height, displacement of the mass hanger should be equal 1.2 m.
5. Wind a rope to the starting position and attach a 2 kg weight to the mass
hanger.
6. Release the weight, start the stop watch simultaneously, and stop it when
the mass hanger reaches the end position 1.2 m later.
7. Repeat the process using a 2 kg weight and complete steps 4, 5 and 6
again
8. Using the conservation of mechanical energy equation, complete the
following table
9|Page
Sketch of Apparatus
Explanation of Apparatus
Experimental data
Average
Data Weight Used Displacement Time
Case 1 2 kg 17.17 s
Case 2 4 kg 12.7 s
Calculations
Theoretical Calculations
Area
For Mass 1
𝐴 = 2𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝐴 = 2𝜋(10)2 (38)
𝐴 = 23876,104 𝑚𝑚2
For Mass 2
𝐴 = 2𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝐴 = 2𝜋(12)2 (78)
11 | P a g e
𝐴 = 70572,737 𝑚𝑚2
For Mass 2
𝐴 = 2𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝐴 = 2𝜋(175)2 (38,4)
𝐴 = 70389025,921 𝑚𝑚2
Volume
For Mass 1
𝑉 = 𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝑉 = 𝜋(0,01)2 (0,038)
𝑉 = 1,193 × 10−5 𝑚3
For Mass 2
𝑉 = 𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝑉 = 𝜋(0,012)2 (0,078)
𝑉 = 3,529 × 10−5 𝑚3
For Mass 3
𝑉 = 𝜋𝑟 2 ℎ
𝑉 = 𝜋(0,175)2 (0,0384)
𝑉 = 3,695 × 10−3 𝑚3
For Mass 1
𝑚 =𝑣xp
𝑚 = 1,193 × 10−5 x 7800
𝑚 = 0,093 𝑘𝑔
12 | P a g e
For Mass 2
𝑚 =𝑣xp
𝑚 = 3,529 × 10−5 x 7800
𝑚 = 0,272 𝑘𝑔
For Mass 3
𝑚 =𝑣xp
𝑚 = 3,695 × 10−3 x 7800
𝑚 = 28,822 𝑘𝑔
Moment of inertia
1
I = 𝑀1 𝑟 2 + 𝑀2 𝑟22 + 𝑀3 𝑟32
2
1
I = 0,093 0.01 + 0,272 0,012 + (28,822)(0,175)2
( )( ) 2 ( )( )2
2
2
I = 0,441 𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
Experimental calculations
Case 1
s =1.2 m ; u = 0
1 2
s = 𝑢𝑡 + a𝑡
2
1
1,2 = 0(17,17) + a(17,17)2
2
1,2 = 147,404a
a = 8,141 × 10−3 𝑚/𝑠 2
u=0
13 | P a g e
v = 𝑢 + 𝑎𝑡
v = 0 + (8,141 × 10−3 )(17,17)
v = 0,14 𝑚/𝑠
r = 0.0125 m
v = 𝑤𝑟
𝑣
𝑤=
𝑟
0,14
𝑤=
0,0125
𝑤 = 11,2 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
1
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = 𝑚𝑣 2
2
1
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = (2,2)(0,14)2
2
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = 0,022 J
𝐸𝑝 = 𝑚𝑔ℎ
𝐸𝑝 = (2,2)(9,81)
𝐸𝑝 = 25,90 𝐽
1 2
𝐸𝑘𝑅 = 𝐼𝑤
2
1 2
1 2
𝑚𝑔ℎ = 𝑚𝑣 + 𝐼𝑤
2 2
1 2
1 2
25,90 = (2,2)(0,14) + 𝐼𝑤
2 2
1
𝐼𝑤 2 = 25,879 𝐽
2
Moment of Inertia
1 2
1 2
𝑚𝑔ℎ = 𝑚𝑣 + 𝐼𝑤
2 2
14 | P a g e
1 1
25,90 = (2,2)(0,14) + 𝐼(11,2)2
2
2 2
2
𝐼 = 0,413 𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
Case 2
s =1.2 m ; u = 0
1 2
s = 𝑢𝑡 + a𝑡
2
1
1,2 = 0(12,7) + a(12,7)2
2
1,2 = 80,645a
a = 0,015𝑚/𝑠 2
u=0
v = 𝑢 + 𝑎𝑡
v = 0 + (0,015)(12,7)
v = 0,191𝑚/𝑠
r = 0.0125 m
v = 𝑤𝑟
𝑣
𝑤=
𝑟
0,191
𝑤=
0,0125
𝑤 = 15,28 𝑟𝑎𝑑/𝑠
1
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = 𝑚𝑣 2
2
1
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = (4,2)(0,191)2
2
𝐸𝑘𝐿 = 0,077 𝐽J
𝐸𝑝 = 𝑚𝑔ℎ
𝐸𝑝 = (4,2)(9,81)
𝐸𝑝 = 49,442 𝐽
15 | P a g e
1 2
𝐸𝑘𝑅 = 𝐼𝑤
2
1 2
1 2
𝑚𝑔ℎ = 𝑚𝑣 + 𝐼𝑤
2 2
1 1
49,442 = (4,2)(0,191)2 + 𝐼𝑤 2
2 2
1
𝐼𝑤 2 = 49,366𝐽
2
Moment of Inertia
1 1
𝑚𝑔ℎ = 𝑚𝑣 2 + 𝐼𝑤 2
2 2
1 1
25,90 = (2,2)(0,14) + 𝐼(11,2)2
2
2 2
2
𝐼 = 0,423 𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
Percentage Error
For Case 1
𝑣𝐸 − 𝑣𝐴
𝛿= × 100%
𝑣𝐸
0,441 − 0,413
𝛿= × 100%
0,441
= 6,349 %
For Case 2
𝑣𝐸 − 𝑣𝐴
𝛿= × 100%
𝑣𝐸
0,441 − 0,423
𝛿= × 100%
0,441
= 4,104 %
16 | P a g e
Discussion
Conclusion
As a result of the experiment, the moment of inertia of a flywheel had
been studied and achieved, which results in the dependence of
mass and radius of the wheel as stated in the equation 𝐼 =
1 2
𝑀𝑟 .Rotational kinetic energy and liner kinetic energy and velocity
2
were understood.
The experimental value and the theoretical value of the moment of
inertia it was found that there was a small percentage error which
show that the experimental value was not far of the theoretical value
we can conclude that the error was cause by a human mistake. Thus
if the experiment was done in an ideal environment the error can be
minimized.
References
1. https://byjus.com/jee/moment-of-inertia-of-
flywheel
2. https://infinitylearn.com/surge/blog/iit-
jee/moment-of-inertia-of-flywheel/
3. https://blog.oureducation.in/moment-of-inertia-of-
a-flywheel-by-falling-weight-method/
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_function#:~:t
ext=A%20weight%20function%20is%20a,weighted
%20sum%20or%20weighted%20average.
5. https://byjus.com/maths/percent-
error/#:~:text=Smaller%20percent%20errors%20indi
cate%20that,off%20from%20the%20true%20value.