Annexure -1

Part-A Micro-Project Proposal

(Format for Micro-Project ProposalA about 2-3 pages)

Title of Micro-Project

1.0 Aims/Benefits of the Micro-Project (minimum 30-50 words)

2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed

a) i**s*edtereesoseeasesiste

b)
********************

d) *********
***************.

3.0 Proposed Methodology

(Procedure in brief that will be followed to do the micro-project) in about 100 to 200 words).
5.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activity)

Details of activity Planned Planned Name of Responsible

S.
No. Start date Finish date Team Members

Resources Required (major resources such as raw material, some machining facility, software etc:)
6.0

Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks

S. No.

Names of Team Members with Roll Nos.

1. * * * * *****************************

2 e*********************************

******* ****".*********************************

**************
 Annexure - 1

Part B Micro-Project Report

(Outcomes after Execution) Format for Micro-Project Report (Minimum 6 pages)

Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Rationale
(Irnportance of the project, in about 30 to 50 words. This is a modified version of the sarier one written after the work)

2.0 Aims/Benefits of the Micro-Project

3.0 Course Outcomes Addressed (Add to the earlier list if more COs are addressed)

a)
b) *****

c)

4.0 Literature Review

5.0 Actual Methodology Followed.
Write step wise the work was done, including which team member did what work and how the data was analysed (if any).
(Attached separate sheet/or you back side of the paper)

6.0 Actual Resources Used (Mention the actual resources used).

S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks

7.0 Outputs of the Micro-Projects

(Drawings of the prototype, drawings of survey, presentation of collected data, findings etc.)
8.0 Skill Developed/ Learning outcome ofthis Micro-Project

9.0 Applications of this Micro-Project

**************
 Teacher Evaluation Sheet
Name of Student: .. ***

..Enroliment No.
Name of Programme.. ************ *** **e*********esn sas esn assssasnnen Je
... Semester: ..... ****ee****** **o *ne*** ****************** ***********

COurse Iule . . . . sn*ssesa*esa s . . C0ae. osos...

Title of the Micro-Project:. * * *****o *************.*****. **.******o****.****** ******e ******.***

Course Outcomes Achieved

. . . . . . * . * . . . . . . . * . * * * *o * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ************************** ***

Evaluation as per Suggested Rubricfor Assessment of MicroProject

Sr. Characteristic to be assessed Poor Average Good Excellent

No. (Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5) (Marks 6-8) (Marks 9- 10)

Relevance to the course

2 Literature Review/information
collection
3 Literature Review/information
collection
Analysis of Data and representation

5 Completion of the Target as per

project proposal
6 Report Preparation

Presentation of the Micro project

8 Presentation of the Micro project

 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process and Product Assessment Total Marks
(6 marks) Individual Presentation/Viva 10
(Note: The total marks taken from the above Rubrics is (4 marks)
tobeconvertedin proportion of'6 marks)

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)

*'*** *************

"**********

*******************'********* ******
* * * * * * * *** * * * * * * * " * * * * * * " * * * * * * * * * * * * * * e *** ***********e**************e*************

* *******o*o* ** **********o********************************* ************************'** ***" ****************** ****

. * ***** ***********.*********************** * * " " * * * * * * " * * * * " " * * * * * * " * * * * * * * * * ******

Name and designation of the Teacher. ***************

Dated Signature. *********

 Annexure I11

Suggested Rubric for Assessment ofMicro Proiect

Consider the
(The rubric given below may be modified depending on the type of micro-project.
SIX most relevant characteristics for evaluating the microproject)

(Allot the marks in the appropriate cell given below each criteria)
Good Excellent
S. No. Characteristic Poor Average
Marks 4-5) (Marks 68) Marks 9-10)
to be
assessed ( Marks 1-3) Addressed more
Relevance to Relatedto Related to some Addressed at-least
one CO than one CO
the course very few LOs Los
At -least 7 About 10 relevant
2 Literature Not more At-least 5
relevant sources, relevant sources, sources, most
Review/iform than two latest
at least 2 latest most latest
ation sources

collection (primary and

secondary)
very old

reference
Completed 60 to Completed more
Completion of Completed Completed 50 to
80% than 80 %
the Target as lessthan 50% 60%
per project
proposal Enough data
Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and
Analysis of
small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
Data and
sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
representation neither
organized nor data generated data generated appropriate
but not which is organized sample size.
presented
organized and and presented Proper inferences
well
not presented well but poor drawn by
well. No or poor inferences drawn organising and

inferences presenting data

drawn through tables,

charts and

graphs.

Just Well Well

Quality of Incomplete
fabrication/as assembled/fabri assembled/fabrica assembled/fabric
Prototype/Mo
cated and parts ted with proper ated with proper
del sembly.
are not functioning parts. functioning parts.
functioning well. In proper shape, In proper shape,
Not in proper within tolerance within tolerance
shape, dimensions and dimensions and
dimensions good good
beyond finish/appearance. finish/appearance
tolerance limit. But no creativity .Creativity in
Appearance/finis in design and use design and use of
h is shabby. of material material
S. No. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
to be assessed ( Marks 1-3) (Marks 4-5) ( Marks 6 -8) (Marks 9-10)
Report Very short, Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation poor quality and correct and clear correct, clear

sketches, details about description of description of

Details about methods, methods, methods,

methods, material, materials, materials,
precautions and precautions and precautions and
material,
precaution conclusion, but Conclusions. conclusions.

and clarity is not Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,

conclusions there in Description. charts and
omitted, presentation. sketches
some details But not enough
are wrong graphic
description.
7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,
of the Micro information information but information and includes major
is not not well well organized but information ,well
project
included, organized and not presented presented
information not presented well
is not well well
organized.
Replied to Replied properly Replied most of
Defense Could not
reply to considerable to considerable the questions
considerable number of number of properly
number of questions but question.
question. notvery
properly

Total Marks