Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advocacy
Advocacy
Reading 691
Advocacy Statement
In February of 2010 the U.S. Senate agreed that early screening for Dyslexia in
kindergarten aged students was essential. This requirement and further investigation has led to a
wide range of research into what Dyslexia is, how we can identify it, and the screeners that are
best suited in the assistance of that identification. It is my opinion that this early identification be
swift and exact so that students who are Dyslexic can quickly receive interventions that will
identification of Dyslexia. Students who struggle through their journey to reading and never
learn the joy that reading can bring to their lives. Through the interviews conducted during the
Senate's committee investigation it was determined that early intervention for students was
essential. A universal screener was a necessary component of literacy plans for all schools. The
outcome of this process resulted in the requirement for Virginia schools to assess all
I will advocate that the results of these assessments are reviewed with a critical eye.
Students who are at risk must be further assessed and provided with interventions that are
explicit. This is particularly critical as research has shown that the younger the child the easier it
is to develop improvements in their literacy acquisition. The PALS screener should be one
component of determining where a child falls in the RTI framework. As early childhood
literacy is at the forefront of many current conversations across the literacy community, we
should all be aware of research based best practice that allows for early identification and
intervention for children with reading difficulties. This ensures that children with Dyslexia are
Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University (2016). From Best Practices to