2-Week 7-8 Video Project On Who The Human Person Is-Group

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES


Claro M Recto Avenue, Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City
Week 7-8 Activity (Group)
Tel.Nos (088) 856-1738/856-1739 Telefax (088) 856-4696

Science & Technology


Rubric andProject:
for Video the Human Condition
(50 pts)
A Video
Rubrics for the Video Project and Group Project:
Leader’s Who is the
Individual Human
Rating Person?
for the members:

CATEGORY 5 3 1 0
Score: 50 points
Sources Source information collected Source information collected Source information collected Very little or no source
for all graphics, facts and for all graphics, facts and for graphics, facts and quotes,
Deadline: March 31, 2023 (Friday) information was collected.
quotes. All documented in quotes. Most documented in but not documented in desired
desired format. desired format. format.

Attractiveness
Name/Grp. Makes excellent use of font, Makes good use of font,
#: ___________________________________ Makes use of font, color,
Date Use of font, color,
Completed: ____________________
color, graphics, effects, etc. to color, graphics, effects, etc. graphics, effects, etc. but graphics, effects etc. but
enhance the presentation. to enhance to presentation. occasionally these detract from these often distract from
___________________________________ the presentation content. the presentaion content.

Mechanics ___________________________________
No misspellings or grammatical Three or fewer misspellings Four misspellings and/or More than 4 errors in
errors. and/or mechanical errors. grammatical errors. spelling or grammar.
___________________________________
Content(x2) Covers topic in-depth with Includes essential knowledge Includes essential information Content is minimal OR
details and examples. Subject about the topic. Subject about the topic but there are there are several factual
___________________________________
knowledge is excellent. knowledge appears to be 1-2 factual errors. errors.
good.
Course & Year _____________________________ Date Uploaded: _______________
Organization Content is well organized using Uses headings or bulleted Content is logically organized There was no clear or
headings or bulleted lists to lists to organize, but the for the most part. logical organizational
group related material. overall organization of topics structure, just lots of facts.
One-minute Video Project with RUBRICSappears flawed.

Originality Product shows a large amount Product shows some original Uses other people\'s ideas Uses other people\'s ideas,
General Instructions:
of original thought. Ideas are thought. Work shows new (giving them credit), but there but does not give them
creative. ideas and insights. is little evidence of original credit.
thinking.

1. This isAllarequirements
Requirements group video project.
are met and All requirements are met. One requirement was not More than one
(x2) exceeded. Expressed the Expressed the philosophical completely met. Expressed the
2. Details on how you will be graded
philosophical
Rubric found below. requirement
are shown in thephilosophical
ramifications/implications
was not
completely met. Expressed
3. Everyone in the group will
ramifications/implications and brainstorm and
and the elements of discuss ramifications/implications
how to go about the and storyline.
the philosophical
the elements of Heidegger/CS Lewis/Jason the elements of CS Lewis/Jason ramifications/implications
Aristotle/Heidegger/CS Hickel are weaved together Hickel are weaved together and the elements of Jason
Lewis/Jason Hickel are weaved Hickel.
Specific Instructions:
together

Videography Video did not rock/shake and Video did not rock/shake and Video had a little Problems with
1. Fromthethe focusweb, pick an artwork
was excellent the focusthat shows
was excellent for a shared concern/issue
rocking/shaking, but the focus that reveal AND
rocking/shaking or
deeply reflect who the human person is in the face of Modern Science and
throughout. the majority of the video. was excellent throughout. focus.

Total Technology 50 pts and provide a practical answer/solution that are guided by lawful and
ethical standards
Date Created: Feb 1, 2021 10:32 pm (CST) Created using Rubistar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/

2. As a group, create a one-minute video that explains and or expresses the


philosophical implications, weaving together the elements of Aristotle/Heidegger/CS
Rubric to Lewis/JHickel
be used by the Group ideas/Bill
Leader’sJoy.in Rating the Members:
3. Don’t forget to 5give credit to sources of
CATEGORY 4
artwork/pictures or 3text that are not yours. 1
4. Make sure to consider the Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) (for Week 7-8 provided
Contributions Routinely provides useful ideas when Usually provides useful ideas when Sometimes provides useful ideas Rarely provides useful ideas when
in USteP) as inyou
participating prepare
the group and in for participating
your project. in the group and in when participating in the group and in participating in the group and in
classroom discussion. A definite classroom discussion. A strong classroom discussion. A satisfactory classroom discussion. May refuse to
leader/member who contributes a lot group leader/member who tries group leader/member who does what participate.
Republic of the Philippines

UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES


Claro M Recto Avenue, Lapasan, Cagayan de Oro City
of effort. Tel.Noshard!
(088) 856-1738/856-1739 Telefax (088) 856-4696
is required.

Quality of Work Provides work of the highest quality. Provides high quality work. Provides work that occasionally needs Provides work that usually needs to be
to be checked/redone by other group checked/redone by others to ensure
members to ensure quality. quality.

Time- Routinely uses time well throughout Usually uses time well throughout Tends to procrastinate, but always Rarely gets things done by the
the project to ensure things get done the project, but may have gets things done by the deadlines. deadlines AND group has to adjust
management on time. Group does not have to procrastinated on one thing. Group Group does not have to adjust deadlines or work responsibilities
adjust deadlines or work does not have to adjust deadlines or deadlines or work responsibilities because of this person\'s inadequate
responsibilities because of this work responsibilities because of this because of this person\'s time management.
person\'s procrastination. person\'s procrastination. procrastination.

Attitude Never is publicly critical of the project Rarely is publicly critical of the Occasionally is publicly critical of the Often is publicly critical of the project
or the work of others. Always has a project or the work of others. Often project or the work of other members or the work of other members of the
positive attitude about the task(s). has a positive attitude about the of the group. Usually has a positive group. Often has a negative attitude
task(s). attitude about the task(s). about the task(s).

Working with Almost always listens to, shares with, Usually listens to, shares, with, and Often listens to, shares with, and Rarely listens to, shares with, and
Others and supports the efforts of others. supports the efforts of others. Does supports the efforts of others, but supports the efforts of others. Often is
Tries to keep people working well not cause \"waves\" in the group. sometimes is not a good team not a good team player.
together. member.

Focus on the task Consistently stays focused on the task Focuses on the task and what needs Focuses on the task and what needs to Rarely focuses on the task and what
and what needs to be done. Very self- to be done most of the time. Other be done some of the time. Other needs to be done. Lets others do the
directed. group members can count on this group members must sometimes nag, work.
person. prod, and remind to keep this person
on-task.

Date Created: Feb 1, 2021 10:32 pm (CST) Created using Rubistar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/

Other References:

Science, Technology, and Society by Daniel Joseph McNamara, S.J., Vida Mia Valverde, Ramon Beleno III

Science, Technology and Society by Edaward Mansarate Quinto and Aileen Domondon Nieva 

*****E N D*****

You might also like