jSeeee decigor obs whe shevd evaluate performonce + wnat Jormat shoud be vied Thaw Me results should be WANized Gorge. + Reedtoack enous now vel = MeveleputErt - detiaercies oF Weabncsses Discumastection - to need legal cequitnenls + Discussions of performance occurs confiicts When _ geeganeameyeanartaaly suberdiaates end supeVisors cle net agree * Company peticies ond procedures may preset baniels : ‘ Hoeysien (pecess) Adaivortsy, appraisers may be pouily Aalncd Segeoae ' Teneo : UL BEstoblisnmene ok poformance stantards ncaa ieceate tel cleived Rrom compories steategie. geal faite exglngees based on Jom cnalysig wd job descciption. Commusiention of perk: tend: Ac enplegre 2. muryally Set measuceble BH measwemert of peformonce vsing, inforucction fot ee L fesonal bsencation gmeasve echt pecerune Aahoteal regets 4 cal cegorts 4.Compre acticl patoruerte poeieet fepetia With stendortr 4 5. Discus Ine apgratsal Cempersca of actual gerfoowte with standerts B Disvesion of appraisal with enplegee WeriBeation of corectve actin “hee necessary, Lith the enploge 4 © W aecessony, inthe corrective acon \mmediate action dents cuit sympthers Base correctte action dects wih courses2) late s\erentsy 3) COTE Beet card: comparing ores 7 achieved oveaues Be ce ws Simomagensnt by objectin > . _ mee) me rep 50° git based on nes ’ aan * appraiser > Neekvicals Renting ® We specific clyernes | Pees. tak Cenked from highest E ee cen ‘y WBE corison cttmerts: “> CeiNeatinet ent > paearcempersn Sates SPRBRSGY: bosedon Ley Compered everyone Srl ae bebewise Nusteabing eMKecte end fad rang “eepledt Aime petet oF inelfatwe Jou pork based on number eh "pens Heedboack ~ CieLtisINEppIaical Benes pee(tered, © gs ; : member ine pair AQyISET cates emp. en @ nombe ok job-related factors => Forcea/=chsice appraisal» cheese equally. fewernbie + Weveutraly Aner Pati” PAENECARS® Levaviovad clescriptions Mostrabing, veriwus dimersions along each Fak ‘Ss secte ™ Factors that con DEKSERTAR HRA? *AEERIEARGTEMED: each cuciiaker has his oy Value syste GHEISTSRBM! coe trait influence evaluation on att traits + Sumilouitjeren | evaluator perceives “duowsnappraiSeeavatWation * may be reluciat to be aeweale \E inpe teat retort = for euplayee leper on results = (GeRRemRERUREE teense Cong scales nol distinguish emery players a Ror equality Jone of Lows cates. tess aifterantiation ey cup : Inapprupsatert sata hintes for perfortionce’ semnethings are less relevant tor sore ole Ariaeunieammmnesyy bated on + internal Pactor, Hey con control nd extern frctors Witich they Coonet poor Ferg hongjsine Peahysa omy harder Yudgeere “mgeastonmmonaggReHe: postive relotonthip Uh supenitor, (eicive higher cebiegSSRASEANIMBRUMSY! moe job-related ond edie’) mee inter agfeenens. tron Mails sucess) {1 > (omioinemAaseimlermbngelainenstededs, absclvte Fou to be pasiterely leniext relate suffer Witte Noiablity. > Reovidemongplegynfeeataacles shoe expectation ont Serre! => VEgmRUMNpIemesterssy increasing cabees leads to mow cect *peer evaluations —9 coroners aesert te and valid restings. supwerd apgaisnts — eng feedeart fer nesegem Bho-Pegiee eppeitcd > hetes a ee a ead > pummmpam «gi one e eweie ond neeens Negel Nabil 30 crop clese,