Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Chatbot-Based E-Services For E-Government: July 2020
A Chatbot-Based E-Services For E-Government: July 2020
A Chatbot-Based E-Services For E-Government: July 2020
net/publication/342747448
CITATIONS READS
0 1,119
4 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Shomitro Kumar Ghosh on 07 July 2020.
Abstract:
Chatbots are becoming a very essential part of our daily digital life and they are proliferated on
the messaging platform and are engaged as digital assistants by the largest technological
environments. Already, customer service leaders are moving beyond initial chatbot trials into
main streams. A chatbot-based e-services e-Government system has been proposed for
proliferating an environment that can provide all e-services of the government as the largest
technological digital assistants moving beyond initial chatbot into mainstream use. It matters for
three reasons: results, convenience, and future positioning. With good design and
implementation, more than 80% chat sessions resolved by a chatbot in the e-services of the e-
Government.
1. Introduction:
Action or manner of governing a state thrives on the ability of the government to ensure
efficient, effective, transparent and responsive administration. Bangladesh is a large and diverse
country making the task of governance that much more challenging. Slow and outdated
processes and bureaucratic hurdles have traditionally fettered governance in Bangladesh, but the
recent pivot towards the adoption of emerging technologies is re-invigorating the system.
Towards this, there has been sustained discourse in the recent past to optimize the use of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in fostering efficient governance. As the National Strategy for AI has
validly identified, the development of AI within each sector must consider the incremental value
that the deployment of technology can provide to improve existing processes within each sector
rather than aspiring to be a tool that can replace human decision-making in its entirety. However,
this enthusiasm is yet to be realized by large-scale technological capability and deployment of AI
driven solutions in the five sub-sectors of governance that we considered. We can say, broadly
that in most cases, the use of AI in governance is ‘on the horizon,’ as the institutional and
technological framework for its deployment is underway as is the infrastructure, capacity and
trust needed to successfully adopt these frameworks.
In our research, three key trends are noticed. First, even though there has been enthusiasm at the
prospect of using algorithms across all states, technological capability and implementation is far
from uniform. Some places appear to be more vigorous than other places in implementing the
use of algorithms in sectors such as education and agriculture. Second, most of the AI
technology being used is developed by the private sector, which is working in partnership with or
contractually with the government. Finally, much of the technology which is at the center of
conversations around AI and governance has already been implemented in other countries. While
Bangladesh could look to emulate some of this technology, it would do well to assess some of
the technological, legal and ethical concerns that have arisen in these countries and leapfrog
these challenges before the technology is implemented in the governance.
AI has the power to transform the way that governments around the world deliver public
services. In turn, this could greatly improve citizens’ experiences of government. Governments
are already implementing AI in their operations and service delivery, to improve efficiency, save
time and money, and deliver better quality public services. Governments need to implement AI in a
way that builds trust and legitimacy, which ideally requires legal and ethical frameworks to be in place for
handling and protecting citizens’ data and algorithm use (Table 1). A coherent national AI strategy is a
good proxy for measuring the strength of AI-focused governance.
The goal of this paper is to give an overview of the challenging areas of e-services of the e-
Government done by using the chatbots developed by Artificial Intelligence to draw some
conclusions regarding the status, the applicability and the future of e-service technology. This
can be applied for doing all sorts of Government services.
Service Provider: A service provider is the party that provides software applications for specific
needs as services. Service providers publish, unpublished and update their services so that they
are available on the Internet. From a business perspective, this is the owner of the service. From
an architectural perspective this is the platform that holds the implementation of the service.
Service Requestor: A requestor is the party that has a need that can be fulfilled by a service
available on the Internet. From a business perspective, this is the business that requires certain
function to be fulfilled. From an architectural perspective, this is the application that is looking
for and invoking a service. A requestor could be a human user accessing the service through a
desktop or a wireless browser; it could be an application program; or it could be another e-
service. The requestor finds the required services via the Service Broker and binds to services via
the Service Provider.
Service Broker: This party provides a searchable repository of service descriptions where
service providers publish their services and service requesters find services and obtain binding
information for services. It is like telephone yellow pages. Such examples of service brokers are
the e-speak e-Services.
2.2 Anticipated Advantages of E-Services
The following paragraphs focus on the anticipated benefits of e-service approach as compared to
today’s applications.
Interoperability: Any e-service can interact with any other e-service. This is achieved through
an XML-based interface definition language and a protocol of communication. By limiting what
is absolutely required for interoperability, interacting e-services can be truly platform and
language independent. This means that developers should not be expected to change their
development environments in order to produce or consume e-services. Furthermore by allowing
legacy applications to be exposed as services, the e-services architecture easily enables
interoperability between legacy applications or between e-services and legacy applications.
Easy and Fast Deployment: Enterprises using the e-service model are expected to provide new
services and products without the investment and delays a traditional enterprise requires. They
may utilize the best-in-their-class component services without having to develop them
(outsourcing).
All kinds of operations, either basic or value-added applied either to simple or to composite
services are expected to expose their functionality at two different levels:
• At a lower abstraction level, i.e. at a level mainly concerned with the syntactic or
implementation aspects of an e-service
• At a higher abstraction level, i.e. at a level where the main focus is on the semantic or
conceptual aspects of e-services.
Low level operations are tailored towards the programmers’ requirements, while high level
operations facilitate the work of business users by shielding off the lower level technical details.
It is expected for the e-service paradigm to prevail if all desirable operations are offered at a high
abstraction level.
The above three-dimensional categorization results in the eight sub-cubes are presented in Fig. 3.
5. Conclusions
E-services are the next stage of evolution for e-business for any government. Perhaps that is the
most intriguing about the e-service paradigm is that what it matters is the e-service functionality
irrespectively of the technology that has been used to build them. Here, we have presented an
overview of evolving chatbot standards and we examined the various technical challenges and
the corresponding research contributions. From this analysis, it became obvious that the
examined existing standards approach e-service development bottom-up and provide solutions
only. There are a lot of hurdles and limitations that must be overcome in order for mass adoption
to occur. It is important that all initiatives cooperate in the development of universally accepted
e-services standards, because one of the key attributes of Internet standards is that they focus on
protocols and not on implementations. Otherwise, competing standards from industry
heavyweights could prevent widespread adoption of eservices.
References:
[1] Fingar, P.: Component-Based Frameworks for E-commerce. In Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43 (10),
(2000), 61-70
[2] Web Services architecture overview: The next stage of evolution for e-business. Available at: http://www
106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/w-ovr/?dwzone=ws
[3] Kuno, K.A.: Surveying the E-services Technical Landscape. In Proceedings of the 2nd Int.
[4] Pelzt, C.: Interacting with services on the Web: a review of emerging technologies and standards for e-
services. Available at: http://devresource.hp.com/devresource/ Topics/
[5] van den Heuvel, W.J., Yang, J., Papazoglou, M.P.:Service Representation, Discovery and Composition for E-
Marketplaces. To be presented at the 6th Int. Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS 2001),
Trento, Italy, September 5-7, (2001)
[6] The Advertisement and Discovery of Services (ADS) protocol for Web Services. Available at :
http://www.cn.ibm.com/developerWorks/web/ws-ads/index_eng.shtml
[7] ebXML – White Paper – Enabling Electronic Business with ebXML. Available at:
http://www.ebxml.org/white_papers/whitepaper.html