Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AGE18202 (2+1) UNITI-Lecture Notes
AGE18202 (2+1) UNITI-Lecture Notes
The broths sitting in the optically pure air remained "sweet" to smell
and taste after many months of sitting, while the ones in ordinary air started to
become putrid after a few days. This demonstration extended Louis Pasteur's
earlier demonstrations that the presence of micro-organisms is a precondition
for biomass decomposition.
However, the next year (1876) Tyndall failed to consistently reproduce the
result. Some of his supposedly heat-sterilized broths rotted in the optically
pure air. From this Tyndall was led to find viable bacterial spores
(endospores) in supposedly heat-sterilized broths.
He discovered the broths had been contaminated with dry bacterial spores
from hay in the lab. All bacteria are killed by simple boiling, except that
bacteria have a spore form that can survive boiling, he correctly contended,
citing research by Ferdinand Cohn. Tyndall found a way to eradicate the
bacterial spores that came to be known as "Tyndallization".
Tyndallization historically was the earliest known effective way to destroy
bacterial spores. At the time, it affirmed the "germ theory" against a number of
critics whose experimental results had been defective from the same cause.
Tyndallization essentially consists of heating the substance to boiling point
and holding it there for 15 minutes, three days in succession. After each
heating, the resting period will allow spores that have survived to germinate
into bacterial cells; these cells will be killed by the next day's heating.
Edward Jenner
Jenner continued his research and reported it to the Royal Society,
which did not publish the initial paper. After revisions and further
investigations, he published his findings on the 23 cases. Some of his
conclusions were correct, some erroneous; modern microbiological and
microscopic methods would make his studies easier to reproduce. The
medical establishment deliberated at length over his findings before accepting
them.
Joseph Lister, 1st Baron Lister, known between 1883 and 1897 as Sir Joseph
Lister, Bt., was a British surgeon and a pioneer of antiseptic surgery.
Joseph Lister,
He promoted the idea of sterile surgery while working at the Glasgow Royal
Infirmary. Lister successfully introduced carbolic acid (now known as phenol)
to sterilise surgical instruments and to clean wounds. Applying Louis Pasteur's
advances in microbiology, Lister championed the use of carbolic acid as an
antiseptic, such that it became the first widely used antiseptic in surgery. He
first suspected it would prove an adequate disinfectant because it was used to
ease the stench from fields irrigated with sewage waste. He presumed it was
safe because fields treated with carbolic acid produced no apparent ill-effects
on the livestock that later grazed upon them. Lister's work led to a reduction in
post-operative infections and made surgery safer for patients, distinguishing
himself as the "father of modern surgery.
The discovery of microbial effects on organic and inorganic matter started with
the discovery of Theodore Schwann and others (1937) who observed that
yeast cells are able to convert sugar to alcohol i.e. alcoholic fermentation. It
was Pasteur’s observations that revealed about anaerobic and aerobic
microorganisms. Role of microorganisms in the carbon, nitrogen and sulphur
cycles in soil and aquatic habitats were discussed by Sergei N. Winogradsky
(1956-1953) and Martinus Beijerinck (1851-1931), The Russian microbiologist
Winogradsky also discovered that
(i) soil bacteria oxidize Iron, Sulphur and Ammonia to obtain energy,
(ii) isolated anaerobic N2 fixers and
(iii) studied the decomposition of cellulosic organic matter.
On the other hand, Beijerinck, contributed a lot in the area of microbial
ecology. Azotobacter, a free living nitrogen fixer was isolated. Later a root
nodulating bacterium named as Rhizobium and sulphate reducers were also
isolated. Both these microbiologists developed the enrichment culture
techniques and the use of selective media in the microbiology.
In 20th century, microbiology developed from the angle of other disciplines of
biological sciences in such a way so that problems of cell structure to the
evolution are solved. Although, more emphasis were laid down on the agents
of infectious disease, the immune response, chemotherapeutic agents and
bacterial metabolism.
Beadle and Tautam (1941) used mutants of the bread mold,
Neurospora while Salvadore Luria and Max Delbruck (1943) used bacterial
mutants to show that gene mutations were truly spontaneous and not directed
by the environment. Avery, Macleod, and Mc Carty (1944) evidenced that
DNA was the genetic carried genetic information. Such discoveries made
microbiology, genetics and biochemistry as modern molecularly oriented
genetics. Microbiology contributed maximum in molecular biology which deals
with the physical and chemical aspects of living matter and its function. The
genetic code and the mechanism of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis were
also studied by using several microorganisms. Regulation of gene expression
and the control of enzymes activity were also discussed in the light of
microbiology in 1970’s new discovery such as recombinant DNA technology
and genetic engineering were also led to development of microbiology which
gave the service of microbial biotechnology.
Scientists of West C jester University, Pennsylvania have revived a microbe
that had been in suspended animation for 250 million years, a remarkable feat
which boosts theories that the ancient seeds for life arrived on Earth from
space. Russell Vreeland (2003) isolated a spore forming Bacillus sp. From
250 years old sample of salt crystal found below ground (1850 ft.) in New
Mexico. The bacterium seems to be similar to Bacillus marismortui. Earlier,
there were reports of oldest living creatures of 254-40 million years.
Genetic analysis showed that each mutant differed from the original, normal
type by only one gene. Biochemical studies showed that the mutants seemed
to be blocked at certain steps in the normal metabolic pathways. Their cells
contained large accumulations of the substance synthesized just prior to the
blockage point - just as Garrod's patients had accumulated alkapton.
As Beadle and Tatum had predicted, they were able to create single gene
mutations that incapacitated specific enzymes, so that the molds with these
mutations required an external supply of the substance that the enzyme
normally produced, and the substance that the enzyme normally used, piled
up in the cell. These results led them to the one gene/one enzyme hypothesis,
which states that each gene is responsible for directing the building of a
single, specific enzyme.
Eukaryotic cells
Prokaryotic Cell (Bacterium)
When present,
Usually present; chemically
Cell wall chemically simple in
complex in nature
nature
It contains large
Ribosome It contains small ribosomes.
ribosomes.
Always have
Cytoplasm No cytoskeleton
cytoskeleton
Cell division is by
Cell division Cell division is by binary fission
mitosis
Reproduction is
Reproduction Reproduction is always asexual
asexual or sexual
It is complex in nature
Consist of two protein building
Flagella and consists of
blocks
multiple microtubules
Common with
Multi-cellular forms Rare extensive tissue
formation
Sterols and
No carbohydrates and lacks
Plasma membrane carbohydrates are
sterols
both present
Genes
Prokaryotes also differ from eukaryotes in the structure, packing,
density, and arrangement of their genes on the chromosome.
Prokaryotes have incredibly compact genomes compared to
eukaryotes, mostly because prokaryote genes lack introns and
large non-coding regions between each gene.
Whereas nearly 95% of the human genome does not code for
proteins or RNA or includes a gene promoter, nearly all of the
prokaryote genome codes or controls something.
Prokaryote genes are also expressed in groups, known as
operons, instead of individually, as in eukaryotes.
In a prokaryote cell, all genes in an operon(three in the case of the
famous lac operon) are transcribed on the same piece of RNA and
then made into separate proteins, whereas if these genes were
native to eukaryotes, they each would have their own promoter
and be transcribed on their own strand of mRNA. This lesser
degree of control over gene expression contributes to the simplicity
of the prokaryotes as compared to the eukaryotes.