Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Manish Ks
    The linear programming model was infeasible, with 138 infeasibilities found after 5 iterations over 4.08 seconds. It had 5 variables and 7 constraints defining a problem with 25 nonzeros. The optimal solution found was infeasible with variable values including X1=6, X3=3, and X5=141, and slack or surplus values such as the objective row being 386 above target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Manish Ks
    12 views1 page
    The linear programming model was infeasible, with 138 infeasibilities found after 5 iterations over 4.08 seconds. It had 5 variables and 7 constraints defining a problem with 25 nonzeros. The optimal solution found was infeasible with variable values including X1=6, X3=3, and X5=141, and slack or surplus values such as the objective row being 386 above target.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The linear programming model was infeasible, with 138 infeasibilities found after 5 iterations over 4.08 seconds. It had 5 variables and 7 constraints defining a problem with 25 nonzeros. The optimal solution found was infeasible with variable values including X1=6, X3=3, and X5=141, and slack or surplus values such as the objective row being 386 above target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    12 views1 page

    Untitled

    Uploaded by

    Manish Ks
    The linear programming model was infeasible, with 138 infeasibilities found after 5 iterations over 4.08 seconds. It had 5 variables and 7 constraints defining a problem with 25 nonzeros. The optimal solution found was infeasible with variable values including X1=6, X3=3, and X5=141, and slack or surplus values such as the objective row being 386 above target.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    No feasible solution found.

    Infeasibilities: 138.0000
    Total solver iterations: 5
    Elapsed runtime seconds: 4.08

    Model Class: LP

    Total variables: 5
    Nonlinear variables: 0
    Integer variables: 0

    Total constraints: 7
    Nonlinear constraints: 0

    Total nonzeros: 25
    Nonlinear nonzeros: 0

    Variable Value Reduced Cost


    X1 6.000000 -0.1907349E-04
    X2 0.000000 0.1600000E+12
    X3 3.000000 -0.3814697E-05
    X4 0.000000 0.1333333E+11
    X5 141.0000 0.000000

    Row Slack or Surplus Dual Price


    1 386.0000 -1.000000
    2 18.00000 0.000000
    3 0.000000 -0.6400000E+12
    4 0.000000 -0.1200000E+12
    5 -55.00000 -0.4000000E+11
    6 -138.0000 -0.4000000E+11
    7 0.000000 -0.1333333E+11

    You might also like