Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Do Two
Do Two
Wrongs
Make
a Right? By Tiffani Parker
SLCC
Criminal Justice 1010
Micheal Cupello
4/12/2023
Abstract
Is the death penalty wrong, or right? Do we need to change the laws on these things.
The answers will vary depending on who you talk to. There are many places that have
not abolished the sentence but have abolished the action executed. There are many
reasons this is a hot topic in today’s world. In this we will be going over some of the
main arguments and reason people agree or disagree with Capital punishment (death
penalty). Some of these include whether Capital punishment is humane. There have
been different techniques to follow through and some that claim they are a more
humane approach. We will be talking about the cost comparison with some resources to
see visuals of the cost difference between life without parole and death row/Capital
We cannot investigate people minds but we can investigate the data that may say if it is
an effective deterrent. We will be talking about the bias if any in the system of Capital
punishment. Finally, we will talk about the irreversible action it is and if it is reasonable
Introduction
The death penalty has been a controversial topic for many years. Supporters argue that
it serves as a deterrent to crime and provides justice for victims and their families.
However, opponents argue that it is morally wrong and inhumane. In this paper will
break down the different points and provide evidence that will help you decide what side
you are on. With most argument there is a usually a middle ground, but with capital
punishment there is a fine line of life and death. There is little to no middle ground on
the topic. This punishment is a permanent punishment. So, if there is no middle ground
what is the right thing to do? Abolish capital punishment? Leave it as it is?
Main Points
Inhumanness
There are many ways that the Capital punishment has been followed through. The most
painless is said to be lethal injection. But upon further research some disagree. But the
most instantaneous is said to be a firing squad. But reality is, there is not humane way
to put someone to death because that is just the nature of things. It is sad and hard for
Cost
There is a running cost that the death penalty will cut the cost of housing the inmates
from life. People that say this have done little to no research on the cost of each
sentence. There is outstanding evidence that the death penalty is much more expensive
than to house the inmates. Palm Beach Post (2000) “Florida would save $51 million
each year by punishing all first-degree murderers with life in prison without parole.
According to estimates by the Palm Beach Post. Based on the 44 executions Florida
has carried out since 1976, that amounts to an approximate cost of $24 million for each
execution.” This is only one of the many examples that you do not save money by
execution but rather spend not just thousands but millions more if you follow through
crime. According to the EBSCOhost Research Platform there is not much if any
evidence that it is not effective. It is suspected that the people that commit a capital
crime have no moral gauge on what they are doing and have little to no remorse so the
punishment in their mind is not really considered or cared for. This is one reason people
believe the capital punishment is acceptable. If there is a person that commits capital
crime and go through the system with all the right legal steps, and it is decided that the
punishment is capital punishment the crime they have committed must be great beyond
life. For most people that are considering the reproduction of their actions most likely
are a staying away from crime at all or just leaning towards petty crime.
Economic bias
According to the Death Penalty info site there is not much bias to the race of the
defendant. The majority of the sentenced are white because the country in the time of
the study was primarily white. They did however find that the race of the victim did seem
to have some bias with is leaning towards white. Leaving some to wonder why we are
not fighting equally for justice for all races. We are proud to say there is not clear
evidence that capital punishment in our American system is bias towards race of the
defendant. Can we say the same about bias of genders? In a piece called why women
aren’t executed, Rueter, T. (1996). It states “Since the beginning of the colonial era,
20,000 people have been lawfully executed in America, but only 400 of them have been
women, including 27 who were found guilty of witchcraft. In the 23 years since the
Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment, 5,569 total death sentences have been
given out by courts, 112 to women. Of these 112, only one has been executed (Velma
Barfield in 1984), compared with 301 men.” It continues to mention that it is because
Irreversibility
Another reason why this is even an argument is because the indefinite result of the
punishment. This is one of the strongest arguments the anti-death penalty side may
have. The argument is that this decision is literally life or death. Many people face this in
their field. Doctors, Police, EMT and more. The difference is that with our court system it
is a clear life or death situation. Not a like doctors and police where there is a second to
react to know what we need to do to save this life. This is a clear night and day
decision. You are taking a life if it is executed. According to The Death Penalty
Information Centers 2022 Year End Report. There are many states that have technically
abolished the capital punishment because this data shows that very few to none of the
people that are sentenced with the capital punishment is executed. This is shown that
they ones placed on death row are likely to get a chance to think about their mistakes.
But let’s be real. If someone has acted in a way to be sentenced to death row, would we
really want them back in our society? No! so they are just going to spend life on death
row indefinitely. There are many cases these people are put on suicide watch because
there is a chance, they will try to take their own life. So why are we preventing the
inevitable. In hospital setting. If someone is on life support and there is a 50% chance of
life, and the family decides to pull the plug tomorrow at 12. Tomorrow at 11 they wake
up and everything is okay. The life of that person was literally in the hand of their family.
That is a life, so the difference is that this person was innocent and the person who is
on death row has committed a heinous crime. This is an indefinite action but only for the
most horrible people that you can almost say are not human because how could
someone do such things and still be okay with themselves. On the Death penalty info
site there is a map that shows 13 out of 50 states have executed the death penalty in
Conclusion
The death penalty is a very sensitive topic with people who agree and disagree. There
are many situations and flaws that we see in the system but we can also see why others
would support and even push for Capital punishment. There is one thing that I think we
can all agree on and that is making our cities safe and our court system ethical. The
way we get there is harder to decide and agree on. I believe we are moving in the right
clear statement. Not be half in and half out. So, do we or do we not have Capital
punishment. Don’t sentence someone to death to not follow through. This leaves the
inmate and their family always on their toes. Just tell them life in prison.
Work Cited
EBSCOhost Research Platform: EBSCO. EBSCO Information Services, Inc. |
https://www.ebsco.com/products/ebscohost-research-platform
State Studies on monetary costs. Death Penalty Information Center. (n.d.). Retrieved
states-death- penalty
Death penalty disproportionately affects the poor, UN rights experts warn. OHCHR.
releases/2017/10/death-penalty-disproportionately-affects-poor-un-rights-experts-warn.
Rueter, T. (1996). Why Women Aren’t Executed: Gender Bias and the Death Penalty.
https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/dpic-reports/dpic-year-end-reports/the-
death- penalty-in-2022-year-end-report
Boots, D. P., Mallicoat, S. L., & Wareham, J. (2018). Life or Death: Using a Real-World
Case to Assess Student Death Penalty Opinion. Journal of Criminal Justice Education,
29(1), 39–61.
Assignment Reflection
What assumptions have you made (outside of the research information evaluated)?
Before Starting my research on this subject I did not rally have much or a strong opinion
either was but was leaning more towards in favor of. I was looking from a viewpoint
more from the outside of a case. While doing research it helped me dive in a little
deeper and be able to see the argument from more than one side. I always just
assumed that a victim’s family of rape or murder would want the death penalty for their
oppressor. Because of the horrible act that was done to their loved one. After getting to
see a little more and the realization that this person id a human being like my own
family. I have family that has gotten into some stuff and thinking if someone would want
them dead is a hard thought of reality. I would not want that for my own father, brother,
son, mother daughter, sister. So why even of the horrible act would I wish that upon
someone. I realized all family victims may not wish that upon them.
Do you need to investigate more facts and data? Yes, I feel I need look more into
actual cases. We can read about different viewpoints, but I want to dive into times
this has actually be the ruling and see what I think of it.
Does the conclusion you came to make sense? I believe it does. It may be the reason
Does the information researched, and your assumptions support the conclusion? No
o If so, why? If not, why not? I feel like I am still on the fence about it and
Did you ask the right questions? I do think so. I believe that is the reason I am not
leaning much to either side anymore. Because I research on both sides was okay.
Was there more than one possible conclusion? Yes, I do not feel like I picked the right
one. When I started this paper I thought I would lean more towards in favor for the death
penalty but now that I am through with this paper and research I am leaning more
towards against.
How has this assignment shaped or changed your perspective concerning the issue?
It helped me lean more towards the other side when I was leaning on way before