Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 15 KEMPRN1
Lecture 15 KEMPRN1
4fz3
LECTURE 15
4fxz2 4fyz2 4fz(x2–2y2) 4fxyz 4fy(3x2–y2) 4fx(x2–3y2
Molecular Orbital Theory
sp
sp2
sp3
sp3dz2
sp3dz2dx2-y2
Method of orbital overlap by VBT does not explain
why carbon in CH4 forms four bonds.
2p
2s
C
2s22p2
Electron promotion followed by hybridization
can explain the bonding scheme in CH4.
promotion of
2p electron 2p hybridize
promotion of
2p electron 2p hybridize
𝜎Csp -Hs
3
2p
2s
C
2s22p2
What about VBT treatment for multiple bonds?
promotion of
2p electron 2p hybridize p
sp2 sp2 sp2
2s 2s
C
2s22p2
What about VBT treatment for multiple bonds?
promotion of
2p electron 2p hybridize p
sp2 sp2 sp2
2s 2s
C
2s22p2
Bonding in Ethylene, 𝑪𝟐 𝑯𝟒
12
What about VBT treatment for multiple bonds?
promotion of
2p electron 2p hybridize p p
sp sp
2s 2s
C
2s22p2
Bonding in Acetylene, 𝐂𝟐 𝐇𝟐
14
Bonding in Acetylene, 𝐂𝟐 𝐇𝟐
15
Bonding in Acetylene, 𝐂𝟐 𝐇𝟐
16
The s and p bonds in acetylene (C2H2)
22
Valence Bond Theory: Limitation
and Difference with MOT
1. VBT cannot explain why O2 is paramagnetic. According to
VBT, all the electrons in O2 are paired and oxygen should
therefore be diamagnetic.
2. Unlike VBT, which uses orbitals that are assigned to one
specific atom, MO Theory uses the combination of AO’s to
yield MO’s that are delocalized over the entire molecule
rather than being localized on their constituent atoms.
23
Energy Levels of Bonding and Antibonding
Molecular Orbitals in Hydrogen 𝐇𝟐
25
Energy Levels of Bonding and Antibonding
Molecular Orbitals in Hydrogen 𝐇𝟐
AAbonding
bondingmolecular
molecularorbital
orbitalhas
haslower
lowerenergy
energyandandgreater
greater
stability
stabilitythan
thanthe
theatomic
atomicorbitals
orbitalsfrom
fromwhich
whichititwas
wasformed.
formed.
26
Energy Levels of Bonding and Antibonding
Molecular Orbitals in Hydrogen 𝐇𝟐
27
Constructive and Destructive Interference
28
Energy Levels of Bonding and Antibonding
Molecular Orbitals in Hydrogen 𝐇𝟐
30
Two Possible Interactions Between Two Equivalent p Orbitals
31
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
32
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
33
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
34
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
35
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
36
Molecular Orbital (MO) Configurations
1. The number of molecular orbitals (MOs) formed is always
equal to the number of atomic orbitals combined.
2. The more stable the bonding MO, the less stable the
corresponding antibonding MO.
3. The filling of MOs proceeds from low to high energies.
4. Each MO can accommodate up to two electrons.
5. Use Hund’s rule when adding electrons to MOs of the
same energy.
6. The number of electrons in the MOs is equal to the sum of
all the electrons on the bonding atoms.
37
MO diagram for He2+ and He2
MO diagram for He2+ and He2
MO diagram for He2+ and He2
43
Relative MO Energy Levels for Period 2
Homonuclear Diatomic Molecules.
with 2s-2p
mixing
MO energy levels
for B2, C2, and N2
Relative MO Energy Levels for Period 2
Homonuclear Diatomic Molecules.
without 2s-2p with 2s-2p
mixing mixing
(a) Because N/4 has one fewer electron than N/, its electron
configuration is
/ / / 5
/ ∗ / ∗ /
𝜎56 𝜎56 𝜎/6 𝜎/6 𝜋/9: 𝜋/9; 𝜎/9<