Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Dissertation
Project Dissertation
A PROJECT REPORT
SUBMITTED BY
SHUBHASHRI ACHARYA
TO
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY
YEAR 2020-2023
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF FOR THE AWARD OF DEGREE OF
1
Certificate
This is to certify that the project report titled “Introversion and Social
avoidance” is a unique part of the work done by Shubhashri Acharya bearing
Roll Number 12013018 under my guidance and supervision. To the best of my
knowledge and belief, the research represents is original piece of work on the
said topic. This project is the result of her effort, hard work and accomplishes
the standard requirement for the award of bachelor’s degree in arts.
2
Declaration
Shubhashri Acharya
BA +3 3RD Year
Roll No. 12013018
Psychology Honours
BJB Autonomous College Bhubaneswar
3
Acknowledgement
4
Abstract
This psychology dissertation explores the relationship between introversion and
social avoidance. Introversion is a personality trait characterized by a preference
for solitude and introspection, while social avoidance refers to the avoidance of
social situations due to fear or discomfort. The aim of this dissertation is to
investigate the extent to which introversion predicts social avoidance, and
whether this relationship is mediated by factors such as anxiety, depression, and
self-esteem.
The results of this study suggest that there is a significant positive correlation
between introversion and social avoidance, with introversion predicting higher
levels of social avoidance. The study also found that anxiety and depression
mediate the relationship between introversion and social avoidance, but self-
esteem does not.
5
6
CHAPTER-1 INTRODUCTION
7
Introduction
Introversion
8
introverts may also possess strengths such as creativity, critical thinking, and
strong listening skills.
Social Avoidance
9
social avoidance. Furthermore, social avoidance can occur in individuals who
are not introverted.
Social avoidance has significant implications for mental health and well-being,
and understanding the factors that contribute to its development and
maintenance is important for developing effective interventions. Cognitive-
behavioural therapy and social skills training have been shown to be effective in
reducing social avoidance in individuals with social anxiety. Furthermore, social
support has been identified as a protective factor against the negative
consequences of social avoidance.
Despite the extensive research that has been conducted on social avoidance,
there is still much to be learned about its nature and development. Future
research should continue to explore the cognitive and behavioural factors that
contribute to social avoidance, as well as the effectiveness of interventions
aimed at reducing its impact on mental health and well-being. By gaining a
better understanding of social avoidance, we can develop more effective
strategies for promoting social engagement and improving overall quality of
life.
10
Aim of the dissertation
Theoretical Frameworks
Several theoretical frameworks have been proposed to explain the nature and
development of introversion and social avoidance. One of the most influential
models is the Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality, which posits that
introversion is one of the five fundamental dimensions of personality, alongside
extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness (Costa & McCrae,
1992). According to the FFM, introversion is characterized by a preference for
solitude, introspection, and reflection, and is associated with lower levels of
social activity and positive affect.
11
A third theoretical framework is the cognitive-behavioral model, which posits
that social avoidance is due to negative beliefs and expectations about oneself
and the social environment (Clark & Wells, 1995). According to this model,
individuals who are socially avoidant may hold negative self-beliefs, such as a
belief that they are unlikable or uninteresting, or negative beliefs about the
social environment, such as a belief that social interactions are inherently
threatening or dangerous. These negative beliefs can lead to avoidance
behaviors, which in turn reinforce the negative beliefs and maintain the cycle of
social avoidance.
Empirical research
For example, studies have found that introversion is positively associated with
social anxiety (Eysenck, 1970; Watson & Friend, 1969) and that introverted
individuals are more likely to report social anxiety symptoms (Rodebaugh,
Woods, & Heimberg, 2007).
Other studies have investigated the role of negative affectivity, or the tendency
to experience negative emotions, in the relationship between introversion and
social avoidance. Research has found that negative affectivity mediates the
relationship between introversion and social avoidance, indicating that
introverted individuals may be more likely to experience negative emotions and
use social avoidance as a coping mechanism (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992; Watson
& Clark, 1984).
12
The cognitive-behavioral model of social avoidance has also received empirical
support. Studies have found that negative self-beliefs, such as a belief that one
is unlikable or uninteresting, are positively associated with social avoidance
(Alden & Bieling, 1998).
Research has also explored the impact of social support and social skills training
on reducing social avoidance in individuals with social anxiety. Studies have
found that social skills training can be an effective treatment for reducing social
anxiety and improving social skills (Heimberg, 1995; McCabe & Antony, 2004).
In addition, research has shown that social support can serve as a protective
factor against the negative consequences of social avoidance (Cohen & Wills,
1985).
13
Conclusion
14
CHAPTER 2-REVIEW OF LITERATURE
15
Research has consistently shown that there is a relationship between
introversion and social avoidance. Introversion is often defined as a personality
trait characterized by a preference for solitary activities, introspection, and a
need for quiet time to recharge. Social avoidance, on the other hand, is a
behavior characterized by the avoidance of social situations due to fear of
negative evaluation, judgment, or rejection by others.
Studies have shown that individuals who score high on measures of introversion
are more likely to exhibit social avoidance behavior. For example, a study
conducted by Schmidt and colleagues (2004) found that introverted individuals
were more likely to experience social anxiety, and were more likely to avoid
social situations due to fear of negative evaluation.
Other studies have examined the specific mechanisms that underlie the
relationship between introversion and social avoidance. One such mechanism is
the role of self-focused attention. Research has shown that introverted
individuals are more likely to engage in self-focused attention, which can lead
to increased self-consciousness and negative self-evaluation in social situations
(Mehl and Conner, 2012). This negative self-evaluation can lead to social
avoidance behavior as individuals attempt to avoid situations in which they may
be negatively evaluated.
Another mechanism that has been proposed to explain the relationship between
introversion and social avoidance is the role of perceived social support.
Research has shown that introverted individuals may perceive less social
support from others, which can increase feelings of social anxiety and lead to
social avoidance behavior (Zawadzki et al., 2019).
16
introverted. Future research should continue to explore the complex relationship
between introversion and social avoidance, and to identify factors that may
moderate or mediate this relationship.
17
CHAPTER-3
RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
18
RATIONALE OF THE STUDY
Despite the extensive research that has been conducted on social avoidance,
there is still much to be learned about its nature and development. Specifically,
there is a need for research that examines the relationship between introversion
and social avoidance, as well as the cognitive and behavioral factors that
contribute to social avoidance in both introverted and non-introverted
individuals.
The rationale for this study is twofold. First, there is a need to better understand
the relationship between introversion and social avoidance. While introversion
and social avoidance are often discussed in the same context, it is unclear
whether they are causally related, or whether they are simply correlated due to
their overlapping characteristics. By examining the relationship between
introversion and social avoidance, we can gain a better understanding of how
these constructs are related, and how they may be targeted in interventions
aimed at reducing social avoidance.
Second, there is a need to identify the cognitive and behavioral factors that
contribute to social avoidance in both introverted and non-introverted
individuals. While previous research has identified a number of factors that
contribute to social avoidance, it is unclear whether these factors are equally
19
relevant for introverted and non-introverted individuals. By examining the
cognitive and behavioral factors that contribute to social avoidance in both
groups, we can gain a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie this
behavior, and develop more targeted interventions that are tailored to the needs
of different individuals.
Overall, this study aims to contribute to our understanding of the nature and
development of social avoidance, and to inform the development of more
effective interventions aimed at reducing its impact on mental health and well-
being.
OBJECTIVE
HYPOTHESIS
20
CHAPTER-4 METHOD OF STUDY
21
Method of Study
Research Design:
This research is an Exploratory Study that aims to see the relationship between
introversion and social avoidance. In this research, the Independent Variable is
the personality trait introversion of individuals, and the Dependent Variable is
the social avoidance as an outcome or response variable that is being measured
to see if it is influenced by introversion.
Sample
The sample used in this study are Adolescents from various, Colleges and
Universities across India. The age ranges of the adolescents were between 18-25
years of age. In total 30 participants were chosen using Convenience Sampling
to be a part of the research.
Tools
To gather data for this research, two tools were used by the researcher, namely:
The items in Component A are scored dichotomously, meaning that they are
answered with either a "yes" or "no" response. Each "yes" response is scored as
22
a "1," while each "no" response is scored as a "0." The scores for the 24 items
are then added up to create a total score for extraversion.
The SADS consists of 28 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging
from 1 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 5 (extremely characteristic or
true of me). The items are designed to assess an individual's level of fear and
distress in social situations, as well as their level of avoidance of social
situations.
To score the SADS, the responses to each item are added up to create a total
score for each subscale (Social Avoidance and Social Distress). Higher scores
on the SADS indicate greater levels of social anxiety and avoidance.
Procedure
The researcher created a Google Form online setting two criteria for
participation in the research, that those who wish to participate must be between
23
the age ranges of 18-25 years of age and must have witnessed some kind of
social avoidance in their lives.
Two instruction sheets were also attached explaining how to fill out the
questionnaires and the instruction for the Eysenck Personality questionnaire
(EPQ) was written as “Please be seated comfortably and listen to me carefully.
The following questionnaire consists of 24 items. You are required to answer
each question by putting a circle around the ‘YES or the ‘NO’ following the
question. There are no right or wrong answers, and no trick questions. Work
quickly and do not think too long about the exact meaning of the questions.”
The instructions for the was given as Social Avoidance and Distress Scale
(SADS) were given as “This questionnaire consists of a number of 24
statements. You are required to decide for each one if it is TRUE or FALSE, as
applied to you. If the statement is TRUE or MOSTLY TRUE as applied to you,
select the true button. If the statements are FALSE or MOSTLY FALSE as
applied to you, select the false option. Remember, there are no right or wrong
answers. You are required to select the option that applies to you.”
The participants were also assured that they could reach out through the
investigator’s Email ID if they had any questions regarding the scales.
24
After the responses had been collected from all the participants, the researcher
then proceeded to divide the scores on the Eysenck Personality Scale given by
participants into two groups namely “Introverts” and “Extroverts”.
After which a t test was conducted using SPSS Software 20 to assess and
analyse if there was any statistically significant difference between the social
avoidance level of those who had high levels of extraversion and those with low
levels of extraversion.
25
CHAPTER- 5 RESULTS
26
The aim of this study was tosocials the relationship between introversion and
social avoidance and for which a sample of 30 participants were chosen.
The mean of social avoidance scores of those with introverts is 17.61 whereas
the mean of social avoidance scores of those extroverts is 6.70 which is
significantly lower. The standard deviation of the first group is 3.73 and the
standard deviation of the second group is 2.41. The calculated t value stands at
9.706 with a Degree of Freedom being 28. Since the obtained critical ratio (CR)
at t is 9.194 which is greater than the table values at level 0.05 and 0.01, it is
statistically significant, P<0.01.
27
Thus, it is safe to conclude that there is a positive relationship between
introversion and social avoidance. The empirical research findings provide
support for the association between introversion and social avoidance. The
results indicate that introverted individuals may be more likely to experience
social anxiety and avoid social situations.
Graphical Representation
20
17.61
18
16
14
12 Introverts
10
8 6.70 Extroverts
6
4
2
0
Introverts Extroverts
Fig 1: Graphical representation of the difference in Mean scores social
avoidance between introverts and extroverts.
28
This is the graphical representation of the Mean Scores of social avoidance
obtained by the group of introverts and those in the extroverts group using a Bar
Graph. On the x axis, the bars depicting the two personalities has been plotted
and on the y axis, the mean scores of social avoidances obtained by both groups
has been plotted. The mean score of social avoidance of those with Introverts
stands at 17.61 and mean score of social avoidance of those who belong in the
extrovert group stands at 6.70.
29
CHAPTER-6
30
Discussion and Conclusion
The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between introversion and
social avoidance of Indian adolescents. For this purpose, 30 Indian Adolescents
who were pursuing their higher education in various high schools, colleges and
universities across India were chosen as participants. Convenience sampling
method was employed to obtain samples.
To gather data for this research, two tools were used by the researcher, namely:
The SADS consists of 28 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging
from 1 (not at all characteristic or true of me) to 5 (extremely characteristic or
true of me). The items are designed to assess an individual's level of fear and
distress in social situations, as well as their level of avoidance of social
situations.
31
To score the SADS, the responses to each item are added up to create a total
score for each subscale (Social Avoidance and Social Distress). Higher scores
on the SADS indicate greater levels of social anxiety and avoidance.
A Google Form was first created and set the eligibility criteria of participation
in the research that the participants must be between the ages of 18-25 and must
have experience social avoidance at any point in their lives. After this, once
many participants showed interest in being a part of the research, the
investigator emailed them a Consent Sheet containing information that their
participation the research was voluntary and that they could back out of the
research if they felt uncomfortable with no liability.
Once their explicit consent was obtained, the researcher then emailed them the 2
Scales that would measure their level of extraversion and levels of social
avoidance with Instruction Sheets clearly explaining the specific procedure of
how to fill out both the Scales. The participants were also assured that their
queries regarding the scales and the research would be answered if they chose to
contact the researcher with their given Email ID.
After collecting responses from the participants, the researcher calculated and
analysed the data using the specified scoring key. The participants were then
separated into two groups based on their scores on the Extraversion subscale:
one group contained participants with high levels of Extraversion and the other
group contained participants with low levels of Extraversion. The researcher
conducted a t-test to determine if there was a statistically significant difference
in social avoidance levels between the two groups.
32
standard deviation of the first group is 3.73 and the standard deviation of the
second group is 2.41. The calculated t value stands at 9.706 with a Degree of
Freedom being 28. Since the obtained critical ratio (CR) at t is 9.194 which is
greater than the table values at level 0.05 and 0.01, it is statistically significant,
P<0.01.
There have been several studies that support the evidence of a positive
relationship between introversion and social avoidance. Here are some
examples:
33
were associated with higher levels of social anxiety (Stoeber & Yang,
2016).
Overall, these studies provide strong support for the idea that introverted
individuals are more likely to experience social anxiety and avoid social
situations than extroverted individuals.
However, it is important to note that not all introverted individuals exhibit social
avoidance. While introversion may be a risk factor for social avoidance, it is not
a definitive predictor. Furthermore, social avoidance can occur in individuals
who are not introverted.
34
Despite the complexity of the relationship between introversion and social
avoidance, this dissertation highlights the need for interventions that can help
individuals overcome social avoidance and improve their mental health and
well-being. Cognitive-behavioural therapy and social skills training have been
found to be effective in reducing social avoidance in individuals with social
anxiety. Additionally, social support has been identified as a protective factor
against the negative consequences of social avoidance.
35
References
https://scholarworks.uni.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1312&context=grp#:~:
text=This%20paper%20explores%20connections%20between%20introversion
%20and%20decreased,pressures%20introverts%20to%20attempt%20to%20cha
nge%20their%20personalities.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323454022_An_analysis_of_the_relati
onship_between_IntroversionExtroversion_Resiliency_and_Social_Support
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734327/
Social Anxiety and Introversion in College Students PDF | PDF | Social Anxiety
Disorder | Extraversion And Introversion (scribd.com)
36
Appendices
37